Paper from TAG 2012 reviewing recording and excavation practice, arguing that primary recorder should be responsible for more active decision-making and interpretation. Commentary available from http://panopto.lamp.ac.uk/Panopto/Pages/Viewer/Default.aspx?id=3156c19d-1d85-424d-b4ad-c5832420603e
4. Archaeological practice
Interesting/ useful not necessary
Interesting / useful + necessary
Not interesting / useful but necessary
Not interesting / useful and not necessary
5. Philosophy of recording
• Logical positivism
– Measurability
– Objectivity
– Consistency
• Reflexive methodologies
– Construction of knowledge
– Surfacing assumptions and debating ideas
– Embracing subjectivity
6. Philosophy of recording
T5 Heathrow
“production of a coherent and empirically
validated site narrative remains the
fundamental objective of the excavation ”
John Barrett
Interpretation during excavation
Entities not contexts
Staff uncomfortable
8. Philosophy of recording
• Single interpretation
• Recorder as surrogate for director/reader
• Value = report/archive
• Memories/experience?
• Reification of commercial practice
9. Lean management
• Mapping work processes
• Creation of value
• Reduction of waste
• Maintenance
• Continuous improvement
21. The future
• Work that creates no value
• Work that creates limited value
• Work that creates value
• Empowerment of the primary recorder
• Engagement with process and content
• Data or meaning
22. Thanks
P J Carne, UDAS
John Lewis, Society of Antiquaries
Andrew Marvell, GGAT
Quentin Drew UWTSD
Martin Locock
10simplesteps.blogspot.com
m.locock@tsd.ac.uk