Bromleys Trust Board Self Analysis And Planning Exercise Presentation
1. a joint meeting of the Bromley Children and Young People Trust Board and Commissioning Strategy Group a review of our commissioning arrangements 8 February 2010 Education Development Centre, Church Lane, Princes Plain, Bromley BR2 8LD
2.
3. agenda Tess Sharp Workshop session 1: analysis of current practice 13:45 to 14:45 Tess Sharp Introduction to workshop session 1 13:35 to 14:45 Tess Sharp Introduction to workshop session 2 15:15 to 15:20 Terri Walters and Tess Sharp Where do we go from here? 16:10 to 16:30 Close 16:30 Tess Sharp Workshop session 2: planning for change 15:20 to 15:50 Tess Sharp and groups Feedback from all groups 15:50 to 16:10 Refreshment break 15:00 to 15:15 Tess Sharp and groups Feedback from all groups 14:45 to 15:00 Terri Walters and Laurence Downes Welcome and introductions 13:30 to 13:35 Networking lunch 13:00 to 13:30 Lead Item Time
4.
5. working to achieve “the five rights” “ The right service at the right time in the right place for the right people with the right outcomes ”
6. our commissioning cycle Step 1 : Analyse needs using information from all the Trust partners (from all sectors), users and providers; and identify local and national priorities Step 2 : Compare the needs analysis to identify gaps in current service delivery against the identified local and national priorities; and identify resources (funding, local market, informal support) to meet the identified gaps Step 3 : Plan how services will be developed and purchased to meet the identified needs and to improve outcomes using the available resources Step 4 : Purchase and deliver services to meet the identified needs; and support individuals to access services and support directly Step 5 : Review and monitor the quality of the service against quality assurance standards; and the suitability of current services against the needs analysis to ensure that services are improving outcomes for children and young people Analyse needs Identify gaps, resources and priorities Plan service development and delivery Purchase and deliver services Review, monitor and improve Inform Consult Involve
7. our commissioning framework A suite of documents that will support the partners of the Trust to commission services Service specific strategies Active Involvement Strategy Workforce Development Strategy Third Sector Development Strategy Market Development Strategy Commissioning Aims, Principles and Processes Our intentions: short-term and long-term Children and Young People Plan Commissioning Strategy Framework
12. All of the CSP programme activities are focused on outcomes
13.
14. Explore. .. Prepare Deliver Sustain Gate 1 Gate 2 Gate 3 Review 1 Review 2 Review 3 Self Analysis and Planning facilitated GAP GAP We understand where we are now, where we want to be and the need to act We can see the best options for closing the gap and a refined / achievable vision The SAPE is the starting point for the CSP bespoke intervention in a Children’s Trust Wider Engagement Develop aspirations Diagnosis – ‘Deeper Dive’ Weighing options / prioritising Planning Initial Engagement Best practice 1 (aspiration) Best practice 2 (refined / achievable) ‘ Explore’ Success Criteria ‘ Prepare’ Success Criteria Gate 4 ‘ Deliver’ Success Criteria ‘ Sustain’ Success Criteria Initial priorities for change Outline Change Plan Support agreement Change Plan
15.
16. Each standard has a “maturity profile” against it – for example on the first standard this is the maturity profile Standard Score 1 - We have no clear agreement about what is needed to move forward Score 2 - We do agree what is needed, and have begun to move forward Score 3 - We are making progress towards meeting the standard Score 4 - We are making very good progress towards meeting the standard Score 5 - The standard is fully achieved across the Children’s Trust Specific questions to consider further Section A. Commissioning Governance and Framework 1. We are clear and agreed about the outcome priorities we need to deliver for children, young people and their families in our area. There is little or no agreement between partners across the Children’s Trust about the outcome priorities for children, young people and families, or about the areas that it particularly needs to focus on. The Children and Young People's Plan has little influence over the planning priorities of partners. Partners have agreed that they need to improve practice in this area. There is agreement about the outcomes the Children’s Trust particularly needs to focus on, but more work is needed to secure the evidence behind them, or to translate them into effective commissioning plans. The Children’s Trust Board is clear about outcomes needed for some parts of the population, but not clear about others. There are only a limited number of plans for service improvement and redesign. The outcome priorities identified by the Children’s Trust are based on good evidence. Outcome priorities and improvements are clearly defined, agreed by all members. These priorities consistently drive commissioning and service development agendas for all partners. Does the Children’s Trust need to be clearer or more rigorous in the Children and Young People's Plan (CYPP) about the outcomes that it is trying to achieve? Are there particular population groups (e.g. Looked After Children (LAC), 5-11 year olds, or a particular locality) which The Children’s Trust needs to focus on in more detail? Can you show how commissioning has improved outcomes for these groups or localities? Is the CYPP compliant with recent national guidance?