Presentation in context of the TENCompetence Workshop "Rethinking Learning and Employment at a time of economic uncertainty". Manchester, November 2009.
1. 1
Collaborative web search with
LearnWeb2.0
Results of pilots at the eLearning Department of the
University of Hannover
Miriam Lerch
19th November 2009
2. 2
Research partner
elsa = E-Learning Service Department of the University of
Hannover
Provides extensive support and advice for the deployment
of new technology and media in the learning practice
Partners include the Architektenkammer Niedersachsen
and the International Association for Consulting
Competence e.V.
Miriam Lerch, M.A. Collaborative web search with LearnWeb2.0 19th November 2009
elsa
4. 4
Evaluation Framework: seminar at the University of
Hannover during the summer term 2009
Target group: 15 students of Bachelor Special Education
+ Technical Education
Period: 2 April – 12 July
Learning Scenario: Using the platform for collaborative
web search for the preparation of group presentations
Miriam Lerch, M.A. Collaborative web search with LearnWeb2.0 19th November 2009
Study Setup
5. 5Miriam Lerch, M.A. Collaborative web search with LearnWeb2.0 19th November 2009
Learning Scenario with LearnWeb2.0
global web
search
add Web 2.0
resources to
group
comment,
tag, share
1 2 3
6. 6
Research questions
1. What skills in terms of using Web 2.0 technologies do the
students already have?
2. Will the students use LearnWeb2.0 for collaborative web
search?
3. How do the students use LearnWeb2.0 for collaborative
web search – which functionalities are most heavily
used?
4. Which prerequisites and competences are needed for
collaborative self-directed learning with LearnWeb2.0?
Miriam Lerch, M.A. Collaborative web search with LearnWeb2.0 19th November 2009
7. 7
Evaluation approach
Descriptive, multi-faceted and explorative survey
Using different qualitative research methods (interviews)
with enriching quantitative methods (questionnaire, logfile
analysis)
Timeframe of the pilot: 2 April – 12 July 2009
Participants: 15 students, 3 teachers
Data: 5 group interviews (9 persons), 5 drop-outs, 3
teacher surveys, server logs
Miriam Lerch, M.A. Collaborative web search with LearnWeb2.0 19th November 2009
8. 8
Evaluation approach
Research methods:
1. Survey on Internet use
2. Group interviews (+ Logfile analysis)
3. Questionnaire for non-users
4. Teacher survey
Miriam Lerch, M.A. Collaborative web search with LearnWeb2.0 19th November 2009
10. 10
LearnWeb2.0 can be characterized as groupware >
category “collaborative systems”
supports collaboration during computer-aided group
work
BUT: the support for communication and awareness has
not yet fully been realized
possible impact on collaboration processes
Miriam Lerch, M.A. Collaborative web search with LearnWeb2.0 19th November 2009
System analysis of LearnWeb2.0
11. 11
Answers to the research questions
1. What skills in terms of using Web 2.0 technologies
do the students have?
Very different previous experience in dealing with Web
2.0 software
Use of various Web 2.0 applications rather passive;
active use is limited to participation in social networks
Skills and previous experience in dealing with Web 2.0
technologies (i.e. Social Tagging) are relatively limited
Miriam Lerch, M.A. Collaborative web search with LearnWeb2.0 19th November 2009
12. 12
Answers to the research questions
2. Do the students use LearnWeb2.0 for collaborative
web search?
9 users, 5 non-users
Participants used the platform at the beginning of the
evaluation period more than at the end
especially during and immediately after the exercises
in the seminar
Using the platform privately at home
Miriam Lerch, M.A. Collaborative web search with LearnWeb2.0 19th November 2009
13. 13
Answers to the research questions
LearnWeb2.0 was used between two and ten times
Lack of time was given as a reason
Students preferred to continue current practices
Search functionality was used primarily, commenting or
rating to a lesser extent (1 - 4 times)
Additional search methods were used (e.g. Google)
Miriam Lerch, M.A. Collaborative web search with LearnWeb2.0 19th November 2009
14. 14
Answers to the research questions
3. How do the students use LearnWeb2.0 for
collaborative web search?
Used for searching and organizing media resources
Found media were used to enrich the presentations
Students also used texts and documents (offline and
online) as background material
Not all found resources were judged to be useful
Miriam Lerch, M.A. Collaborative web search with LearnWeb2.0 19th November 2009
15. 15
Answers to the research questions
Opportunities for collaboration were hardly used
Communication about resources took place outside of
the platform (offline)
Technical difficulties interfere with work and collaboration
processes
Difficulties in navigation and operation of the system
(usability)
Nonetheless: LearnWeb2.0 was perceived by most
students as helpful for collaborative web search!
Miriam Lerch, M.A. Collaborative web search with LearnWeb2.0 19th November 2009
16. 16
Answers to the research questions
4. Which prerequisites and competences are needed for
collaborative self-directed learning with
LearnWeb2.0?
Computer literacy and skills to deal with Web 2.0
technologies
Competences regarding collaboration and group-based
work
Motivation
Miriam Lerch, M.A. Collaborative web search with LearnWeb2.0 19th November 2009
17. 17
Recommendations for future use
Users should have some previous experience and skills in
dealing with Web 2.0 technologies
Thorough preparation (e.g. account creation) and
sufficient time for getting used with the tools is needed
Teachers would like to have example learning
arrangements
To improve search experience, the range of integrated
Web 2.0 infrastructure should be as large as possible
e.g. link additional (locally popular) Web 2.0 services
(Mister Wong, MyVideo, StudiVZ)
Miriam Lerch, M.A. Collaborative web search with LearnWeb2.0 19th November 2009
18. 18
Recommendations for future use
Support functions related to collaboration and
communication should be expanded
Resources should be applied to the learning context
certain resource types are more suitable than others
(e.g. documents, videos)
Miriam Lerch, M.A. Collaborative web search with LearnWeb2.0 19th November 2009
19. 19
Conclusion
Students currently still have relatively limited skills in
dealing with Web 2.0 technologies
The brief introduction and training period were not
sufficient for introducing the students to Web 2.0 and the
benefits of various technologies for collaborative web
search
The innovative character of the platform turned out to be a
challenge for the users
Concepts were highly appreciated Suitable scenarios
for putting the platform into use should be developed
Miriam Lerch, M.A. Collaborative web search with LearnWeb2.0 19th November 2009
20. 20
Conclusion
The envisaged scenario of iterative tagging, commenting
and rating was not used as expected
especially communication and collaboration support
should be extended
Despite the technical difficulties encountered and despite
limited online collaboration between students, the
students judged LearnWeb2.0 as helpful for collaborative
web search in preparation for group presentations
could imagine using the system in future
Miriam Lerch, M.A. Collaborative web search with LearnWeb2.0 19th November 2009
21. 21
Thank you for your attention!
Miriam Lerch, M.A. Collaborative web search with LearnWeb2.0 19th November 2009