8377877756 Full Enjoy @24/7 Call Girls in Pitampura Delhi NCR
Peatland Diversity and Carbon Dynamics
1. PeatlandDiversity and Carbon Dynamics Mike Whitfield Nick Ostle, Richard Bardgett, Rebekka Artz miit@ceh.ac.uk | www.mikewhitfield.co.uk
2. Background: Peatlands and climate change Above- and below-ground links Research: Plant and soil diversity Peatland carbon stocks Greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, CH4, N2O) Conclusions
3. Introduction: Peatlands Globally, peatlands constitute 25 – 30% of the soil carbon pool Climate warming is projected to be greatest over high northern latitudes, coincidental with a high proportion of the world’s peatlands Roughly 8% of UK is covered with blanket peat moorland Map data: Jones et al. 2005: Estimating organic carbon in the soils of Europe for policy support. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00728.x
4. Introduction: Peatlands Globally, peatlands constitute 25 – 30% of the soil carbon pool Climate warming is projected to be greatest over high northern latitudes, coincidental with a high proportion of the world’s peatlands Roughly 8% of UK is covered with blanket peat moorland
5. To a depth of 1m, UK peatlands contain 1357Mt C, nearly half of which is in Scotland A loss of 12% of the UK peatland area = total annual UK human GHG emissions (Bradley et al. 2005; Smith et al. 2010)
6. Introduction: Climate-Carbon Feedback Uncertainty Estimates of global soil organic carbon stocks range between 700 – 2946 x 1012kg Need reliable estimates based on upscaling processes from small to larger scales to resolve uncertainty. ‘Bucket and slab’ peatland models What about the biological functioning?
7. Introduction: Linking Plant and Soil Biodiversity Growing evidence of feedbacks between the biosphere and global biogeochemical cycles. Plant-soil interactions lie at the heart of these feedbacks. Climate change and land use are powerful drivers of change in plant diversity. What will the implications be? Pendall et al. 2008
8. Main Questions Are there any relationships between plant diversity-abundance and microbial community structure at the landscape scale? Can these relationships be used to predict ecosystem scale greenhouse gas emissions? How little do I need to know about biodiversity to predict ecosystem C cycling and GHG emissions?
9. Field Site: Trout Beck, Moor House, north Pennines Area: 1146 ha Altitudinal range: 535 – 848m 90% blanket peat
10. Upscaling Peatland Carbon Dynamics Survey of peatland condition (plant-soil diversity and carbon stocks) Measurement of peatland GHG function Statistical analyses and spatial modelling of both (LiDAR, image classification and geostatistics (e.g. regression kriging) …to predict carbon dynamics and greenhouse gas fluxes at the ecosystem scale
19. Methodology: soil-sampling Spatial distribution of soil sampling Coring locations randomly selected based on membership of landform (OM, EA, GU) and depth (0-100, 100-200, 200-300cm) categories Microbial community sampling: Three depths within each core Based on mean water table conditions derived from published and unpublished data 0-5cm: Acrotelm 15-20cm: Mesotelm 75-80cm: Catotelm
23. Below-ground: Peat Depths Deepest peat under open moorland Kruskal-Wallis test indicates significant differences between landform types (p < 0.001)
24. Below-ground: Carbon Stocks Significantly lower CN ratio in gullies(ANOVA, f =34.6, p <0.001) Higher C content in gullies (Kruskal-Wallis, p <0.001)
25. Below-ground: Microbial community Significant differences between landforms for Actinobacterial and Total PLFA (Kruskal-Wallis tests: p <0.001 and p = 0.005 respectively) Perhaps reflecting lack of plant inputs on bare peat in eroding areas…
27. Greenhouse Gas Fluxes: Experimental Design What are the differences in greenhouse gas fluxes between landforms? 36 chambers on fixed plots 3 landforms 3 depth classes 4 replicates CO2 CH4 N2O
28. Greenhouse Gas Fluxes: Experimental Design Monthly sampling using static dome chambers, Infra-Red Gas Analysers (IRGAs) and gas chromatography Continuous landform hydrology and temperature measured using automated dip wells Seasonal sampling for C and N, microbial PLFA and T-RFLP May 2010 to June 2011 Image: Sue Ward