SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 8
Download to read offline
Research Study




                                                  The Global Email Deliverability Benchmark
  GET MORE INFO                                   Report, 2H 2009
  rpinfo@returnpath.net
                                                  Deliverability Failures Remains a Challenge for Commercial
  1-866-362-4577
                                                  Email Senders with Non-Delivery Rates as high as 20% across
                                                  the globe.

                                                   Return Path, the global market leader in email deliverability solutions,
                                                   reviewed data from 131 ISPs in the United States, Canada, Europe, and
                                                   the Asia Pacific territories from July through December of 2009. What
                                                   the data shows is that email deliverability still plagues commercial
                                                   email senders worldwide.




                                                      What’s Inside
                                                       • How Much Mail Doesn’t Make It To The Inbox?
                                                       • Business Inboxes Still Difficult To Reach
                                                       • Deliverability Rates Vary by ISP and by Country
                                                       • Three Reasons Why Deliverability Is Still a Crisis for
                                                         Commercial Email Senders




If you have questions or would like to hear how Return Path can help, please call 1-866-362-4577, or email rpinfo@returnpath.net.
© 2010 Return Path, Inc. www.returnpath.net v011909
Research Study
Case Study



How Much Mail Doesn’t Make It To The Inbox?
North American inbox percentages remain flat with 20% of email bulked or missing. The second half of 2009 showed an
inbox placement rate of just 80.1% for permission-based commercial email in the United States and Canada. This represents
a slight increase as compared to the first half of 2009. The percentage of mail delivered to the “junk” or “bulk” email folder
remained flat at 3% in the July to December time period. 16% was not delivered at all between July and December, a slight
decrease from earlier in the year.

The picture was slightly rosier for European mailers with 85% of mail delivered to the inbox. Just 3.6% of email was sent to
“junk” or “bulk” email folder while another 11% was missing or not delivered at all. Asia Pacific outperformed both Europe
and North America posting an impressive 86.9% inbox placement rate with just 3% of email sent to the bulk folder and
10.7% missing.




                                      Global Delivery Rates, 2H 2009
                 100%

                 90%              85.5% 86.9%
                                                                                            North America
                          80.1%                                                            Europe
                 80%

                 70%
                                                                                           Asia Pacific

                 60%

                 50%

                 40%

                 30%

                 20%                                                                    16.3%
                                                                                                11.0% 10.7%
                 10%
                                                          3.5% 3.6% 2.5%
                  0%
                                Inbox                        Junk/Bulk                      Missing



Canada has the highest non-delivered rate blocking almost 14% of permissioned-based email. The United Kingdom boasts
the lowest non- delivered rate, blocking only 10% of opt-in email.




                                  For more information, email us at rpinfo@returnpath.net or call 1-866-362-4577.
                                  © 2010 Return Path, Inc. www.returnpath.net v011909

                                                                                                                       Page 2 of 8
Research Study
Case Study



                             Delivery Rates by Major Global Markets, 2H 2009

                             Canada

                       United States

                             France

                           Germany

                    United Kingdom

                                         0%      10%    20%    30%      40%   50%      60%       70%     80%     90%     100%

                                           United Kingdom     Germany         France         United States      Canada
                               Inbox           89.9%           85.1%          88.2%             82.4%            76.3%
                               Bulk/Junk         3.0%          11.5           4.8%               4.6%            1.7%
                               Missing           7.1%          3.5%           7.1%              13.0%            21.9%




Business Inboxes in U.S. and Canada Still Hard to Reach
Reaching business addresses is still difficult because these inboxes are protected by systems like Postini, Symantec and
MessageLabs. Only 75.2% of email is delivered to the inbox through these enterprise systems. This is a 3% improvement
over the first half of 2009 when just 72.4% made it to the inbox. The second half of year saw little change in non-delivery
rates for B2B email with bulk/junk and missing percentages shrinking by just a few percentage points.


                              Delivery Rates, B2B (US & Canada, 2H 2009)


                    80%                       75.2%
                                72.4%                                                                          1H 2009
                    70%
                                                                                                               2H 2009
                    60%

                    50%

                    40%

                    30%
                                                                                                    21.5%       19.1%
                    20%

                    10%                                           6.1%        5.7%
                     0%

                                         Inbox                         Junk/Bulk                         Missing




                               For more information, email us at rpinfo@returnpath.net or call 1-866-362-4577.
                               © 2010 Return Path, Inc. www.returnpath.net v011909

                                                                                                                                Page 3 of 8
Research Study
Case Study


Deliverability Rates Vary by ISP and by Country

                                  Non-delivery Rates by ISP (United States, 2009)
                     25%


                     20%


                     15%


                     10%


                      5%


                      0%
                                                       Road
                                 Cox       USA.net           BellSouth Netzero           Yahoo!     AOL       Comcast       MSN        Hotmail   Gmail
                                                      Runner
                    1H 2009      8.1%       10.8%         11.9%      14.0%    14.4%      14.7%      16.4%       17.3%       20.0%       20.2%     23.1%
                    2H 2009      5.5%       11.2%         14.6%      21.5%    12.2%      18.5%      17.0%       14.7%       19.2%       19.1%     20.7%


                 For the second half of 2009 non-delivery rates across major U.S. ISPs were relatively flat
                 with a few notable exceptions. BellSouth increased their non-delivered rates by 8% when
                 compared to the first half of the year. Also of note, non-delivery rates for Yahoo!
                 increased 3%, up from 15% to 18% in the second half of the year. Cox had the lowest
                 non-delivered rate, blocking just 5.5% of email.



                                         Non-delivery Rates by ISP (Canada, 2009)
                     60%



                     50%



                     40%



                     30%



                     20%



                     10%



                      0%
                              Telus    Videotron Rogers     AOL.ca    Cogeco Sympatico   Bell     MTS     Inter.net SaskTel   Aliant     Shaw    Primus.ca
                   1H 2009    2.7%      12.5%    12.6%       18.2%    18.6%    21.5%     30.4%    30.4%     31.0%   31.1%     31.2%      33.9%    53.0%
                   2H 2009    2.7%       8.5%    19.9%       17.3%    15.3%    18.7%     20.6%    21.1%     19.2%   21.7%     19.4%      31.6%    54.7%


                 In Canada, delivery rates fared much better when compared to the first half of 2009.
                 The Canadian ISPs that decreased non-delivered rates by the most margins are Bell, MTS,
                 Inter.net, SaskTel and Aliant. Rogers increased non-delivered rates by 7%. Telus blocked
                 just 2.7% of email.



                             For more information, email us at rpinfo@returnpath.net or call 1-866-362-4577.
                             © 2010 Return Path, Inc. www.returnpath.net v011909

                                                                                                                                                             Page 4 of 8
Research Study
Case Study



                                    Non-delivery Rates by ISP (United Kingdom, 2H 2009)
                           30%


                           25%


                           20%


                           15%


                           10%


                            5%


                            0%
                                                 BT                            NTL
                                      AOL                Demon     Hotmail            Orange   Pipex     Smartmail Talk Talk   Tesco     Tiscali   Yahoo!
                                              Internet                        World
                          2H 2009    14.3%     21.8%     24.7%     11.2%       6.8%   12.2%    3.3%        2.0%        3.6%    7.5%      1.8%          12.3%



                        Demon and BT Internet has the highest non-delivered rates for the United Kingdom at
                         24.7% and 21.8% respectively. AOL, Yahoo!, Orange and Hotmail all have non-delivered
                        rates in excess of 10%.



                                            Non-delivery Rates by ISP (Germany, 2H 2009)
                                    70%


                                    60%


                                    50%


                                    40%


                                    30%


                                    20%


                                    10%


                                    0%
                                              AOL          Arcor        Freenet       GMX      Online Home        T-Online     Web.de*        Yahoo!
                                 2H 2009     14.5%         2.8%            11.7%      6.3%        3.5%             5.1%        62.2%          13.3%



                        Germany overall posted very low non-delivery rates with one major exception, Web.de*,
                        which failed to deliver 62.2% of email in the second half of 2009. In contrast, the next
                        highest non-delivery rate was AOL with 14.5% followed by Yahoo! with 13.3%
                        undelivered.


* Web.de filters mail into two bulk folders: “spam” and “unknown”. The “unknown” mail is counted as missing in our data. As a result, the non-delivered
rate for this ISP is significantly higher than for others in the region.

                                            For more information, email us at rpinfo@returnpath.net or call 1-866-362-4577.
                                            © 2010 Return Path, Inc. www.returnpath.net v011909

                                                                                                                                                               Page 5 of 8
Research Study
Case Study




                                     Non-delivery Rates by ISP (France, 2H 2009)
                               16%


                               14%


                               12%


                               10%


                                8%


                                6%


                                4%


                                2%


                                0%
                                       Alice   AOL     Free   Hotmail   LaPoste   Neuf    Orange   SFR     Wanadoo Yahoo!
                             2H 2009   5.9%    14.4%   6.3%   11.6%     13.5%     11.3%   13.3%    15.8%    12.9%   13.5%


                    In France, SFR and AOL are the toughest inboxes to reach with non-delivery rates of
                    more than 14% followed by LaPoste, Yahoo!, Orange Wanadoo and Hotmail with
                    non-delivered rates in excess of 11%. Alice and Free had the lowest, blocking just
                    6% of email.



Three Reasons Why Deliverability Is Still a Crisis for Commercial Email Senders
   •   The Bounce Rate Myth: Senders are generally given reports month after month that show a “delivered” metric that
       tends to be about 95% to 98%. But in most cases this metric is actually the bounce rate. The system is reporting
       the number of messages sent through the pipe and subtracting the number that return a hard bounce. Top-tier
       marketers keep very clean lists and the system itself is set up to clean out those hard bounces quickly (usually
       before the next send). What senders really need to understand are their inbox placement rate (IPR)- the number of
       emails that actually arrive in the inbox.

   •   Revenue Masks a Lot of Sins: Email generates a lot of revenue. So, while deliverability failures cost businesses
       money, this can be masked by the revenue generated by every campaign that goes out the door.

   •   Change is Hard: Many senders are still resistant to implementing the best practices that make email deliverability
       more likely and more consistent. We still see programs with high frequency, low value and lack of segmentation.
       Research done by the Return Path Professional Services team in the last 18 months shows high percentages of top
       brands missing basic best practices like welcome messages, efficient opt-out procedures and appropriate permission
       levels.




                               For more information, email us at rpinfo@returnpath.net or call 1-866-362-4577.
                               © 2010 Return Path, Inc. www.returnpath.net v011909

                                                                                                                            Page 6 of 8
Research Study
Case Study


Conclusion: What Senders Can Do To Improve Their Email Deliverability
It’s easy to believe that deliverability failures must be happening to someone else. But what you don’t know about your
deliverability leaves your business vulnerable and decreases the amount of revenue you could be generating from the email
channel. What’s a smart marketer to do?

1. Get the data you need. Know where your email goes and why. Don’t believe the bounce myth – that whatever gets sent
and doesn’t bounce must be reaching the inbox. Gaining access to relevant deliverability data is crucial for marketers to be
able to make accurate decisions about their program’s effectiveness. This report is based on the Return Path Mailbox Monitor
system which seeds the databases of our clients with known good email addresses. We then monitor whether or not email
sent to those addresses is delivered. These reports often show a wide disparity between the delivered metric shown on the
client’s standard response report and the inbox placement rate (IPR) which is the actual number of messages that arrive in the
inbox.

2. Take deliverability failures seriously. Deliverability failures cost businesses a lot of money. There is significant lost revenue
from email that does not get delivered to the inbox. Consumer research consistently shows that people do not check their
bulk or junk folders for marketing messages. And even if they do, most of the non-delivered mail isn’t there – it’s completely
missing. Email that consumers don’t have access to will not generate a response.

3. Don’t use revenue or response as a proxy for deliverability. Assuming that a program that generates revenue or gets good
response must be delivered to all the inboxes that matter is a mistake. Think about how much money you may be leaving on
the table if a significant chunk of your list isn’t seeing the messages you send.

4. Don’t accept deliverability failures as inevitable or unfixable. The good news is that we have clients who are able to
maintain consistently high deliverability rates across all ISPs. Remember: 80% is the average. So while that means there are
companies at 60% it also means that there are companies at 100%.

5. Take responsibility for where your email lands. While your IT team or email service provider can be important partners,
you are responsible for the deliverability of your email. Most of the major drivers of poor inbox placement rates are the
direct result of marketing practices, not technical ones. These include complaints, which spike when email is unexpected or
undervalued by the recipient and spam traps, which are most often found on lists that are old or have been built with poorly
sourced data.



 What is “Inbox Placement Rate”?
 Inbox Placement Rate (IPR) is the percentage of email messages that are delivered straight to
 the inbox. This excludes email messages that arrive in the “junk” or “bulk” email folders.



                                 For more information, email us at rpinfo@returnpath.net or call 1-866-362-4577.
                                 © 2010 Return Path, Inc. www.returnpath.net v011909

                                                                                                                          Page 7 of 8
Research Study
  Case Study



Methodology
Return Path conducted this study by monitoring data from its Mailbox Monitor service for campaigns conducted from July to
December 2009. This study tracks the delivery, blocking and filtering rates for more than 600,000 campaigns that used the
Mailbox Monitor seed list system. For each campaign, Return Path recorded whether the email was missing, received in the
inbox or filtered to the junk/spam folder (for those ISPs that use such a folder). For this report Return Path reviewed data from
131 ISPs in the United States, Canada, Europe, and the Asia Pacific territories.


About Return Path
Founded in 1999, Return Path helps commercial email senders get more email delivered to the inbox. Our tools and services
give senders the insight and resources to diagnose and prevent email deliverability and rendering failures by improving
and maintaining their email sending reputations. Our Professional Services division then helps our clients improve ROI and
response by creating consistent and compelling subscriber experiences across the email customer lifecycle. Return Path runs
the internet’s most widely used third-party whitelist, the Return Path Certification Program. Return Path also invented the
Sender Score, an email reputation measure based on data contributed by ISPs and other receivers of large volume email into
the Return Path Reputation Network. We offer free access to our Sender Score to any sender, receiver or consumer of email
at our reputation portal: www.senderscore.org. Information about Return Path can be found at www.returnpath.net.




                       Contact Us
                        North America                                 Europe
                         New York                                      United Kingdom
                         304 Park Avenue South,                        12 Melcombe Place
                         7th floor                                     London, NW1 6JJ
                         New York, NY 10010                            Phone: +44 (0) 845 002 0006
                         Phone: 212-905-5500

                         California                                    France
                         100 Mathilda Pl, Suite 100                    164 bis, Avenue Charles de Gaulle
                         Sunnyvale, CA 94086                           92200 Neuilly sur Seine; France
                         Phone: 408-328-5000                           Phone: +33 1 78 15 38 42

                         Colorado
                         8001 Arista Place, Suite 300
                         Broomfield, CO 80021
                         Phone: 303-999-3100




                                  For more information, email us at rpinfo@returnpath.net or call 1-866-362-4577.
                                  © 2010 Return Path, Inc. www.returnpath.net v011909

                                                                                                                        Page 8 of 8

More Related Content

What's hot (7)

Build your business through social media
Build your business through social mediaBuild your business through social media
Build your business through social media
 
CVS Caremark 2003 Annual Report
CVS Caremark 2003 Annual ReportCVS Caremark 2003 Annual Report
CVS Caremark 2003 Annual Report
 
MTG Presentation at the Kinnevik Capital Markets Day
MTG Presentation at the Kinnevik Capital Markets DayMTG Presentation at the Kinnevik Capital Markets Day
MTG Presentation at the Kinnevik Capital Markets Day
 
Developing online marketing strategy to the Rural Sector. NZ 2010
Developing online marketing strategy to the Rural Sector. NZ 2010Developing online marketing strategy to the Rural Sector. NZ 2010
Developing online marketing strategy to the Rural Sector. NZ 2010
 
Survey Hiring Plans for 2011
Survey Hiring Plans for 2011Survey Hiring Plans for 2011
Survey Hiring Plans for 2011
 
Cable Direct Marketing
Cable Direct MarketingCable Direct Marketing
Cable Direct Marketing
 
How can financial services regain consumer trust presentations
How can financial services regain consumer trust   presentationsHow can financial services regain consumer trust   presentations
How can financial services regain consumer trust presentations
 

Viewers also liked (7)

560 technology and education
560 technology and education560 technology and education
560 technology and education
 
House
HouseHouse
House
 
Presentation with audio
Presentation with audioPresentation with audio
Presentation with audio
 
Presentation with audio
Presentation with audioPresentation with audio
Presentation with audio
 
1001 crystal ave
1001 crystal ave1001 crystal ave
1001 crystal ave
 
How to Battle Bad Reviews
How to Battle Bad ReviewsHow to Battle Bad Reviews
How to Battle Bad Reviews
 
Activism x Technology
Activism x TechnologyActivism x Technology
Activism x Technology
 

Similar to Globaldeliverability2 H2009

Riding Wave Social Networking 24 Mar 2009
Riding Wave Social Networking 24 Mar 2009Riding Wave Social Networking 24 Mar 2009
Riding Wave Social Networking 24 Mar 2009
Erick Caniso
 
Adex 2011 online advertising in europe
Adex 2011   online advertising in europeAdex 2011   online advertising in europe
Adex 2011 online advertising in europe
IAB Netherlands
 
Comscore 2010 - Rapport premier semestre
Comscore 2010 - Rapport premier semestreComscore 2010 - Rapport premier semestre
Comscore 2010 - Rapport premier semestre
StephaneHuy
 
APPAM 2011 DeLeire Slides
APPAM 2011 DeLeire SlidesAPPAM 2011 DeLeire Slides
APPAM 2011 DeLeire Slides
soder145
 
Media landscape updater - 2011 summary
Media landscape updater - 2011 summaryMedia landscape updater - 2011 summary
Media landscape updater - 2011 summary
MediaDirectionOMD
 
Conneu nov2011-cloud servicesincreasingarpu
Conneu nov2011-cloud servicesincreasingarpuConneu nov2011-cloud servicesincreasingarpu
Conneu nov2011-cloud servicesincreasingarpu
Rob Blaauboer
 

Similar to Globaldeliverability2 H2009 (20)

The Global Email Deliverability Benchmark Report (Return Path) - OCT11
The Global Email Deliverability Benchmark  Report (Return Path) - OCT11The Global Email Deliverability Benchmark  Report (Return Path) - OCT11
The Global Email Deliverability Benchmark Report (Return Path) - OCT11
 
Riding Wave Social Networking 24 Mar 2009
Riding Wave Social Networking 24 Mar 2009Riding Wave Social Networking 24 Mar 2009
Riding Wave Social Networking 24 Mar 2009
 
International eCommerce
International eCommerceInternational eCommerce
International eCommerce
 
Handling the boom in international commerce
Handling the boom in international commerceHandling the boom in international commerce
Handling the boom in international commerce
 
Improving Closing Ratios
Improving Closing RatiosImproving Closing Ratios
Improving Closing Ratios
 
2012 July Symantec Intelligence Report
2012 July Symantec Intelligence Report2012 July Symantec Intelligence Report
2012 July Symantec Intelligence Report
 
2012 January Symantec Intelligence Report
2012 January Symantec Intelligence Report2012 January Symantec Intelligence Report
2012 January Symantec Intelligence Report
 
Q1 2010 EMAIL TRENDS AND BENCHMARKS
Q1 2010 EMAIL TRENDS AND BENCHMARKSQ1 2010 EMAIL TRENDS AND BENCHMARKS
Q1 2010 EMAIL TRENDS AND BENCHMARKS
 
Adex 2011 online advertising in europe
Adex 2011   online advertising in europeAdex 2011   online advertising in europe
Adex 2011 online advertising in europe
 
Comscore 2010 - Rapport premier semestre
Comscore 2010 - Rapport premier semestreComscore 2010 - Rapport premier semestre
Comscore 2010 - Rapport premier semestre
 
Com scoredatapassport 1h10
Com scoredatapassport 1h10Com scoredatapassport 1h10
Com scoredatapassport 1h10
 
Etude Comscore 2010
Etude Comscore 2010Etude Comscore 2010
Etude Comscore 2010
 
Comscore rapport 2010 Ecommerce et media sociaux
Comscore rapport 2010 Ecommerce et media sociauxComscore rapport 2010 Ecommerce et media sociaux
Comscore rapport 2010 Ecommerce et media sociaux
 
comScore: Data Passport 1/2010
comScore: Data Passport 1/2010comScore: Data Passport 1/2010
comScore: Data Passport 1/2010
 
UBS Ad:Tech 2009
UBS Ad:Tech 2009UBS Ad:Tech 2009
UBS Ad:Tech 2009
 
APPAM 2011 DeLeire Slides
APPAM 2011 DeLeire SlidesAPPAM 2011 DeLeire Slides
APPAM 2011 DeLeire Slides
 
E-mail marketing benchmark_apac_2012
E-mail marketing benchmark_apac_2012E-mail marketing benchmark_apac_2012
E-mail marketing benchmark_apac_2012
 
Media landscape updater - 2011 summary
Media landscape updater - 2011 summaryMedia landscape updater - 2011 summary
Media landscape updater - 2011 summary
 
Stay Connected Philadelphia Recap | October 20th, 2016
Stay Connected Philadelphia Recap | October 20th, 2016Stay Connected Philadelphia Recap | October 20th, 2016
Stay Connected Philadelphia Recap | October 20th, 2016
 
Conneu nov2011-cloud servicesincreasingarpu
Conneu nov2011-cloud servicesincreasingarpuConneu nov2011-cloud servicesincreasingarpu
Conneu nov2011-cloud servicesincreasingarpu
 

More from Marketingfacts

More from Marketingfacts (20)

Abn amro VOS 2011 media
Abn amro VOS 2011 mediaAbn amro VOS 2011 media
Abn amro VOS 2011 media
 
Brandz 100 Milward Brown 2011
Brandz 100 Milward Brown 2011Brandz 100 Milward Brown 2011
Brandz 100 Milward Brown 2011
 
Practical Guide: An overview of behaviour change models and their uses
Practical Guide: An overview of behaviour change models and their usesPractical Guide: An overview of behaviour change models and their uses
Practical Guide: An overview of behaviour change models and their uses
 
Behaviour change reference_report_tcm6-9697
Behaviour change reference_report_tcm6-9697Behaviour change reference_report_tcm6-9697
Behaviour change reference_report_tcm6-9697
 
Oracle atg-mobile-wp-345770 mobile trends
Oracle atg-mobile-wp-345770 mobile trendsOracle atg-mobile-wp-345770 mobile trends
Oracle atg-mobile-wp-345770 mobile trends
 
Social Media Examiner: Social mediamarketingreport2011
Social Media Examiner: Social mediamarketingreport2011Social Media Examiner: Social mediamarketingreport2011
Social Media Examiner: Social mediamarketingreport2011
 
Juryrapporten spin awards 2010 2011
Juryrapporten spin awards 2010 2011Juryrapporten spin awards 2010 2011
Juryrapporten spin awards 2010 2011
 
Gomez webspeedsurvey
Gomez webspeedsurveyGomez webspeedsurvey
Gomez webspeedsurvey
 
20110322 hwh-context-is-king
20110322 hwh-context-is-king20110322 hwh-context-is-king
20110322 hwh-context-is-king
 
Twa2011 persbericht awards
Twa2011 persbericht awardsTwa2011 persbericht awards
Twa2011 persbericht awards
 
Cocreationbeyondthehypeglobalsurveyresults 110123110530-phpapp01
Cocreationbeyondthehypeglobalsurveyresults 110123110530-phpapp01Cocreationbeyondthehypeglobalsurveyresults 110123110530-phpapp01
Cocreationbeyondthehypeglobalsurveyresults 110123110530-phpapp01
 
Worldcom media survey dec10 final
Worldcom media survey dec10 finalWorldcom media survey dec10 final
Worldcom media survey dec10 final
 
Tn snipo spot_onvision_b2b-barometer
Tn snipo spot_onvision_b2b-barometerTn snipo spot_onvision_b2b-barometer
Tn snipo spot_onvision_b2b-barometer
 
Dm plein
Dm pleinDm plein
Dm plein
 
Us mobile search e frontier
Us mobile search e frontierUs mobile search e frontier
Us mobile search e frontier
 
Indenty zoekmachine marketing trends 2011
Indenty zoekmachine marketing trends 2011Indenty zoekmachine marketing trends 2011
Indenty zoekmachine marketing trends 2011
 
Presentatie netsociety daisycon_def 08 maart 2011
Presentatie netsociety daisycon_def 08 maart 2011Presentatie netsociety daisycon_def 08 maart 2011
Presentatie netsociety daisycon_def 08 maart 2011
 
Presentatie netsociety daisycon
Presentatie netsociety daisyconPresentatie netsociety daisycon
Presentatie netsociety daisycon
 
Presentatie yonego daisycon
Presentatie yonego daisyconPresentatie yonego daisycon
Presentatie yonego daisycon
 
Presentatie webcare alex van leeuwen buzz capture 8 maart
Presentatie webcare alex van leeuwen buzz capture 8 maartPresentatie webcare alex van leeuwen buzz capture 8 maart
Presentatie webcare alex van leeuwen buzz capture 8 maart
 

Recently uploaded

+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
?#DUbAI#??##{{(☎️+971_581248768%)**%*]'#abortion pills for sale in dubai@
 
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slideHistor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
vu2urc
 

Recently uploaded (20)

From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time AutomationFrom Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
 
Boost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivity
Boost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivityBoost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivity
Boost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivity
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, AdobeApidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
 
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
 
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
 
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdfGenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
 
Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
 
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps ScriptAutomating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
Automating Google Workspace (GWS) & more with Apps Script
 
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationScaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
 
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of Brazil
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of BrazilDeveloping An App To Navigate The Roads of Brazil
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of Brazil
 
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
 
Tech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdf
Tech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdfTech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdf
Tech Trends Report 2024 Future Today Institute.pdf
 
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
 
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century educationpresentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
 
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slideHistor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
Histor y of HAM Radio presentation slide
 

Globaldeliverability2 H2009

  • 1. Research Study The Global Email Deliverability Benchmark GET MORE INFO Report, 2H 2009 rpinfo@returnpath.net Deliverability Failures Remains a Challenge for Commercial 1-866-362-4577 Email Senders with Non-Delivery Rates as high as 20% across the globe. Return Path, the global market leader in email deliverability solutions, reviewed data from 131 ISPs in the United States, Canada, Europe, and the Asia Pacific territories from July through December of 2009. What the data shows is that email deliverability still plagues commercial email senders worldwide. What’s Inside • How Much Mail Doesn’t Make It To The Inbox? • Business Inboxes Still Difficult To Reach • Deliverability Rates Vary by ISP and by Country • Three Reasons Why Deliverability Is Still a Crisis for Commercial Email Senders If you have questions or would like to hear how Return Path can help, please call 1-866-362-4577, or email rpinfo@returnpath.net. © 2010 Return Path, Inc. www.returnpath.net v011909
  • 2. Research Study Case Study How Much Mail Doesn’t Make It To The Inbox? North American inbox percentages remain flat with 20% of email bulked or missing. The second half of 2009 showed an inbox placement rate of just 80.1% for permission-based commercial email in the United States and Canada. This represents a slight increase as compared to the first half of 2009. The percentage of mail delivered to the “junk” or “bulk” email folder remained flat at 3% in the July to December time period. 16% was not delivered at all between July and December, a slight decrease from earlier in the year. The picture was slightly rosier for European mailers with 85% of mail delivered to the inbox. Just 3.6% of email was sent to “junk” or “bulk” email folder while another 11% was missing or not delivered at all. Asia Pacific outperformed both Europe and North America posting an impressive 86.9% inbox placement rate with just 3% of email sent to the bulk folder and 10.7% missing. Global Delivery Rates, 2H 2009 100% 90% 85.5% 86.9% North America 80.1% Europe 80% 70% Asia Pacific 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 16.3% 11.0% 10.7% 10% 3.5% 3.6% 2.5% 0% Inbox Junk/Bulk Missing Canada has the highest non-delivered rate blocking almost 14% of permissioned-based email. The United Kingdom boasts the lowest non- delivered rate, blocking only 10% of opt-in email. For more information, email us at rpinfo@returnpath.net or call 1-866-362-4577. © 2010 Return Path, Inc. www.returnpath.net v011909 Page 2 of 8
  • 3. Research Study Case Study Delivery Rates by Major Global Markets, 2H 2009 Canada United States France Germany United Kingdom 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% United Kingdom Germany France United States Canada Inbox 89.9% 85.1% 88.2% 82.4% 76.3% Bulk/Junk 3.0% 11.5 4.8% 4.6% 1.7% Missing 7.1% 3.5% 7.1% 13.0% 21.9% Business Inboxes in U.S. and Canada Still Hard to Reach Reaching business addresses is still difficult because these inboxes are protected by systems like Postini, Symantec and MessageLabs. Only 75.2% of email is delivered to the inbox through these enterprise systems. This is a 3% improvement over the first half of 2009 when just 72.4% made it to the inbox. The second half of year saw little change in non-delivery rates for B2B email with bulk/junk and missing percentages shrinking by just a few percentage points. Delivery Rates, B2B (US & Canada, 2H 2009) 80% 75.2% 72.4% 1H 2009 70% 2H 2009 60% 50% 40% 30% 21.5% 19.1% 20% 10% 6.1% 5.7% 0% Inbox Junk/Bulk Missing For more information, email us at rpinfo@returnpath.net or call 1-866-362-4577. © 2010 Return Path, Inc. www.returnpath.net v011909 Page 3 of 8
  • 4. Research Study Case Study Deliverability Rates Vary by ISP and by Country Non-delivery Rates by ISP (United States, 2009) 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Road Cox USA.net BellSouth Netzero Yahoo! AOL Comcast MSN Hotmail Gmail Runner 1H 2009 8.1% 10.8% 11.9% 14.0% 14.4% 14.7% 16.4% 17.3% 20.0% 20.2% 23.1% 2H 2009 5.5% 11.2% 14.6% 21.5% 12.2% 18.5% 17.0% 14.7% 19.2% 19.1% 20.7% For the second half of 2009 non-delivery rates across major U.S. ISPs were relatively flat with a few notable exceptions. BellSouth increased their non-delivered rates by 8% when compared to the first half of the year. Also of note, non-delivery rates for Yahoo! increased 3%, up from 15% to 18% in the second half of the year. Cox had the lowest non-delivered rate, blocking just 5.5% of email. Non-delivery Rates by ISP (Canada, 2009) 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Telus Videotron Rogers AOL.ca Cogeco Sympatico Bell MTS Inter.net SaskTel Aliant Shaw Primus.ca 1H 2009 2.7% 12.5% 12.6% 18.2% 18.6% 21.5% 30.4% 30.4% 31.0% 31.1% 31.2% 33.9% 53.0% 2H 2009 2.7% 8.5% 19.9% 17.3% 15.3% 18.7% 20.6% 21.1% 19.2% 21.7% 19.4% 31.6% 54.7% In Canada, delivery rates fared much better when compared to the first half of 2009. The Canadian ISPs that decreased non-delivered rates by the most margins are Bell, MTS, Inter.net, SaskTel and Aliant. Rogers increased non-delivered rates by 7%. Telus blocked just 2.7% of email. For more information, email us at rpinfo@returnpath.net or call 1-866-362-4577. © 2010 Return Path, Inc. www.returnpath.net v011909 Page 4 of 8
  • 5. Research Study Case Study Non-delivery Rates by ISP (United Kingdom, 2H 2009) 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% BT NTL AOL Demon Hotmail Orange Pipex Smartmail Talk Talk Tesco Tiscali Yahoo! Internet World 2H 2009 14.3% 21.8% 24.7% 11.2% 6.8% 12.2% 3.3% 2.0% 3.6% 7.5% 1.8% 12.3% Demon and BT Internet has the highest non-delivered rates for the United Kingdom at 24.7% and 21.8% respectively. AOL, Yahoo!, Orange and Hotmail all have non-delivered rates in excess of 10%. Non-delivery Rates by ISP (Germany, 2H 2009) 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% AOL Arcor Freenet GMX Online Home T-Online Web.de* Yahoo! 2H 2009 14.5% 2.8% 11.7% 6.3% 3.5% 5.1% 62.2% 13.3% Germany overall posted very low non-delivery rates with one major exception, Web.de*, which failed to deliver 62.2% of email in the second half of 2009. In contrast, the next highest non-delivery rate was AOL with 14.5% followed by Yahoo! with 13.3% undelivered. * Web.de filters mail into two bulk folders: “spam” and “unknown”. The “unknown” mail is counted as missing in our data. As a result, the non-delivered rate for this ISP is significantly higher than for others in the region. For more information, email us at rpinfo@returnpath.net or call 1-866-362-4577. © 2010 Return Path, Inc. www.returnpath.net v011909 Page 5 of 8
  • 6. Research Study Case Study Non-delivery Rates by ISP (France, 2H 2009) 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Alice AOL Free Hotmail LaPoste Neuf Orange SFR Wanadoo Yahoo! 2H 2009 5.9% 14.4% 6.3% 11.6% 13.5% 11.3% 13.3% 15.8% 12.9% 13.5% In France, SFR and AOL are the toughest inboxes to reach with non-delivery rates of more than 14% followed by LaPoste, Yahoo!, Orange Wanadoo and Hotmail with non-delivered rates in excess of 11%. Alice and Free had the lowest, blocking just 6% of email. Three Reasons Why Deliverability Is Still a Crisis for Commercial Email Senders • The Bounce Rate Myth: Senders are generally given reports month after month that show a “delivered” metric that tends to be about 95% to 98%. But in most cases this metric is actually the bounce rate. The system is reporting the number of messages sent through the pipe and subtracting the number that return a hard bounce. Top-tier marketers keep very clean lists and the system itself is set up to clean out those hard bounces quickly (usually before the next send). What senders really need to understand are their inbox placement rate (IPR)- the number of emails that actually arrive in the inbox. • Revenue Masks a Lot of Sins: Email generates a lot of revenue. So, while deliverability failures cost businesses money, this can be masked by the revenue generated by every campaign that goes out the door. • Change is Hard: Many senders are still resistant to implementing the best practices that make email deliverability more likely and more consistent. We still see programs with high frequency, low value and lack of segmentation. Research done by the Return Path Professional Services team in the last 18 months shows high percentages of top brands missing basic best practices like welcome messages, efficient opt-out procedures and appropriate permission levels. For more information, email us at rpinfo@returnpath.net or call 1-866-362-4577. © 2010 Return Path, Inc. www.returnpath.net v011909 Page 6 of 8
  • 7. Research Study Case Study Conclusion: What Senders Can Do To Improve Their Email Deliverability It’s easy to believe that deliverability failures must be happening to someone else. But what you don’t know about your deliverability leaves your business vulnerable and decreases the amount of revenue you could be generating from the email channel. What’s a smart marketer to do? 1. Get the data you need. Know where your email goes and why. Don’t believe the bounce myth – that whatever gets sent and doesn’t bounce must be reaching the inbox. Gaining access to relevant deliverability data is crucial for marketers to be able to make accurate decisions about their program’s effectiveness. This report is based on the Return Path Mailbox Monitor system which seeds the databases of our clients with known good email addresses. We then monitor whether or not email sent to those addresses is delivered. These reports often show a wide disparity between the delivered metric shown on the client’s standard response report and the inbox placement rate (IPR) which is the actual number of messages that arrive in the inbox. 2. Take deliverability failures seriously. Deliverability failures cost businesses a lot of money. There is significant lost revenue from email that does not get delivered to the inbox. Consumer research consistently shows that people do not check their bulk or junk folders for marketing messages. And even if they do, most of the non-delivered mail isn’t there – it’s completely missing. Email that consumers don’t have access to will not generate a response. 3. Don’t use revenue or response as a proxy for deliverability. Assuming that a program that generates revenue or gets good response must be delivered to all the inboxes that matter is a mistake. Think about how much money you may be leaving on the table if a significant chunk of your list isn’t seeing the messages you send. 4. Don’t accept deliverability failures as inevitable or unfixable. The good news is that we have clients who are able to maintain consistently high deliverability rates across all ISPs. Remember: 80% is the average. So while that means there are companies at 60% it also means that there are companies at 100%. 5. Take responsibility for where your email lands. While your IT team or email service provider can be important partners, you are responsible for the deliverability of your email. Most of the major drivers of poor inbox placement rates are the direct result of marketing practices, not technical ones. These include complaints, which spike when email is unexpected or undervalued by the recipient and spam traps, which are most often found on lists that are old or have been built with poorly sourced data. What is “Inbox Placement Rate”? Inbox Placement Rate (IPR) is the percentage of email messages that are delivered straight to the inbox. This excludes email messages that arrive in the “junk” or “bulk” email folders. For more information, email us at rpinfo@returnpath.net or call 1-866-362-4577. © 2010 Return Path, Inc. www.returnpath.net v011909 Page 7 of 8
  • 8. Research Study Case Study Methodology Return Path conducted this study by monitoring data from its Mailbox Monitor service for campaigns conducted from July to December 2009. This study tracks the delivery, blocking and filtering rates for more than 600,000 campaigns that used the Mailbox Monitor seed list system. For each campaign, Return Path recorded whether the email was missing, received in the inbox or filtered to the junk/spam folder (for those ISPs that use such a folder). For this report Return Path reviewed data from 131 ISPs in the United States, Canada, Europe, and the Asia Pacific territories. About Return Path Founded in 1999, Return Path helps commercial email senders get more email delivered to the inbox. Our tools and services give senders the insight and resources to diagnose and prevent email deliverability and rendering failures by improving and maintaining their email sending reputations. Our Professional Services division then helps our clients improve ROI and response by creating consistent and compelling subscriber experiences across the email customer lifecycle. Return Path runs the internet’s most widely used third-party whitelist, the Return Path Certification Program. Return Path also invented the Sender Score, an email reputation measure based on data contributed by ISPs and other receivers of large volume email into the Return Path Reputation Network. We offer free access to our Sender Score to any sender, receiver or consumer of email at our reputation portal: www.senderscore.org. Information about Return Path can be found at www.returnpath.net. Contact Us North America Europe New York United Kingdom 304 Park Avenue South, 12 Melcombe Place 7th floor London, NW1 6JJ New York, NY 10010 Phone: +44 (0) 845 002 0006 Phone: 212-905-5500 California France 100 Mathilda Pl, Suite 100 164 bis, Avenue Charles de Gaulle Sunnyvale, CA 94086 92200 Neuilly sur Seine; France Phone: 408-328-5000 Phone: +33 1 78 15 38 42 Colorado 8001 Arista Place, Suite 300 Broomfield, CO 80021 Phone: 303-999-3100 For more information, email us at rpinfo@returnpath.net or call 1-866-362-4577. © 2010 Return Path, Inc. www.returnpath.net v011909 Page 8 of 8