Converting Consumer Insights Into Actionable Results
1. Converting Consumer Insights
Into Actionable Results
- Breaking through the language
barrier on nutritional
information
Alastair Fairgrieve
Chief Insight Officer - McDonald’s Europe
1
2. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
• Consumer-driven approach to the provision of
nutrition information on meals eaten away from
home
• Iterative “fast learn” applied research
2
3. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Goal – A nutrition information system
Which - Is informative
- Has nutritional validity
- Is engaging
- Is fun and intuitive
- Non language dependent
- Industry and brand-relevant
Timescale - one year (!)
3
4. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Key thought-partners - NSG
- 2cv research (Consumer Insight)
- The Marketing Store (brand / industry
relevance)
- Boxer (packaging design)
Key enabler: Direct senior management engagement
with project
4
5. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Method: “Rolling Learning” qualitative and quantitative research with
consumers of informal eating out across three major
European marketplaces
Validation in: - USA
- Asia
- Latin America
5
8. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Objectives
• Benchmarking of consumer attitudes to nutrition and balanced diet
• Exploring consumer awareness and understanding of current guidelines
• Examination of current examples of nutrition information
• Examination of proposed FSA nutrition information concepts:
• Examination of new McDonald’s labelling concept (GDA)
8
9. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Phase one: Method and sample
• 24 x 2 hour qualitative discussion groups: 6-8 people
• Consumers of IEO 16-55
• 50/50 male/female
• B, C1, C2, D, E seg
• 50% with children under 12 in household
France UK Spain
4 groups: Paris 4 groups Edinburgh 4 groups Madrid
4 groups Glasgow 4 groups Barcelona
2 groups Manchester
2 groups London
9
12. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Consumer response to nutrition dialogue
- Dependent upon national food culture
- Confusion abounds! : Mixed messages!
12
13. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Consumer response to nutrition dialogue
- Dependent upon national food culture
- Confusion abounds! : Mixed messages!
- Language of science / consumer needs to be resolved
13
16. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Nutrition awareness
• Kcal / cal. is the anchor of consumer’s understanding
• Most aware: Women
Mothers
Age group 21-35
Consumers with dietary issues
Younger children
Higher socio-economic groups
16
18. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
General consumer benchmarks
- Calories more = “bad for you”
less = “good for you”
- Fat
- Salt
18
19. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
General consumer benchmarks
- Calories more = “bad for you”
less = “good for you”
- Fat
- Salt
Local consumer benchmarks
- France, Spain: balanced diet / Mediterranean diet
19
20. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
General consumer benchmarks
- Calories more = “bad for you”
- Fat less = “good for you”
- Salt
Local consumer benchmarks
- France, Spain: balanced diet / Mediterranean diet
- UK: salt, sugar, saturated fat
20
21. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
General consumer benchmarks
- Calories more = “bad for you”
- Fat less = “good for you”
- Salt
Local consumer benchmarks
- France, Spain: balanced diet / Mediterranean diet
- UK: salt, sugar, saturated fat
- Spain: vitamins / fibre (+ve) – cholesterol (-ve)
21
22. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
How consumers balance their diet
• On a 3 main meals per day basis
• “If I have a heavy lunch – I’ll eat less for dinner”
• “For most, food intake appears to be a series of
compensations rather than a pre-planned dietary
regime”
22
24. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Conclusion: Nutrition information currently has
little resonance with the consumer
Contributing factors: - Lack of background knowledge
on role of nutrients
24
25. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Conclusion: Nutrition information currently has little
resonance with the consumer
Contributing factors: - Lack of background knowledge on role
of nutrients
- Lack of a consistent framework for
product comparison
25
26. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Conclusion: Nutrition information currently has little
resonance with the consumer
Contributing factors: - Lack of background knowledge on role of
nutrients
- Lack of a consistent framework for product
comparison
- Lack on continuity in approach
- Terminology (cal/kcal/kjoule)
- Market sector
- Manufacturer
- Product
26
- Brands
28. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
The solution: what did consumers tell us?
• Consumers agree a more universal solution is
needed
28
29. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
The solution: what did consumers tell us?
• Consumers agree a more universal solution is
needed
• Labelling should eliminate the guesswork from
balanced eating in and out of the home
29
30. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
The solution: what did consumers tell us?
• Consumers agree a more universal solution is
needed
• Labelling should eliminate the guesswork from
balanced eating in and out of the home
• Consumers make a distinction between eating in and
out of home
30
31. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
The solution: what did consumers tell us?
• Consumers agree a more universal solution is
needed
• Labelling should eliminate the guesswork from
balanced eating in and out of the home
• Consumers make a distinction between eating in and
out of home
• For most, eating away from home was an occasional
family treat which would be “spoiled” by over
prescriptive or alarmist “tobacco-style” labelling
31
32. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Consumer evaluation of existing nutrition information
concepts and graphics:
Standard nutrition panel
32
37. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Trial approaches developed by McDonald’s in context of NSG
input and consumer feedback on existing approaches
McDonald’s: roundel version one
Frite Moyenne (Medium fries)
37
46. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Objectives
• Evaluation and further development of bar chart concept
• Checking meaning and relevance of nutrient icons with consumers, staff and stakeholders
• Evaluation of colour choice
• Evaluation of communication mediums and materials
46
47. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Phase two: method and sample
• Qualitative “sense check” on “bar chart” route
• 7 x 1.5 hour qualitative discussion groups
• 4x qualitative paired depth interviews
• Consumers of IEO 17-55
• 50/50 male/female
• B, C1, C2, D, E seg
• 50% with children under 12 in household
Spain UK
3 groups 3 groups Edinburgh
Madrid
2 paired depths 1 group London
2 paired depths London
47
51. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Pilot tests in Scotland and Spain
* Phases one and two of research led to a high
expectation that the “bar chart” and
communication vehicles would have resonance
with the IEO consumer: To assess the
approach further a pilot test of nutrition
information materials was launched in 14
restaurants (Spain & Scotland) between July-
September 2005.
51
52. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Objectives
• Assessment of consumer, staff and opinion formers’ perceptions and responses to he
nutrition information initiative and communication materials
• Fine-tuning of bar chart concept and the supporting communication materials
• Development of a fact-based case for the implementation of a consumer-driven NI
strategy
• Assessment of any potential impact on sales and consumer purchase dynamics
52
53. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Phase three: method and sample
Pre-pilot: Scotland and Spain (June 2005)
• 3 restaurants each country: qualitative depth interviews with
managers and staff
• In restaurants: each country: 370 quantitative interviews
• Stakeholder qualitative in-depth interviews
Post-pilot: Scotland and Spain (Sept/Oct 2005)
• 7 restaurants each country: qualitative depth interviews with
managers and staff
• In restaurant: each country 500 quantitative interviews
• Stakeholder qualitative in depth interviews
53
55. Nutrition Information Project
Quantitative consumer headlines
• 60% of respondents thought the initiative a “really good
idea”
55
56. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Quantitative consumer headlines
• 60% of respondents thought the initiative a “really good
idea”
• 88% of respondents thought initiative a “good idea”
56
57. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Quantitative consumer headlines
• 60% of respondents thought the initiative a “really good
idea”
• 88% of respondents thought initiative a “good idea”
• 20% of respondents said the initiative might enable
them to visit more often
57
58. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Quantitative consumer headlines
• 60% of respondents thought the initiative a “really good
idea”
• 88% of respondents thought initiative a “good idea”
• 20% of respondents said the initiative might enable them
to visit more often
• 30% respondents said that the initiative might enable
them to make more balanced choices
58
59. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Quantitative consumer headlines
• 60% of respondents thought the initiative a “really good idea”
• 88% of respondents thought initiative a “good idea”
• 20% of respondents said the initiative might enable them to visit
more often
• 30% respondents said that the initiative might enable them to make
more balanced choices
• Consumers with children and those in higher segs showed the most
positive response
59
60. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Quantitative consumer headlines
• 60% of respondents thought initiative a “really good
idea”
• 88% of respondents thought initiative a “good idea”
• Consumers with children and those in higher segs
showed the most positive response
• Consumers claimed that the information may have a
positive effect on behaviour
60
61. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Quantitative consumer headlines
• 60% of respondents thought the initiative a “really good
idea”
• 88% of respondents thought initiative a “good idea”
• Consumers with children and those in higher segs
showed the most positive response
• Consumers claimed that the information may have a
positive effect on behaviour
• Would like to see a similar system adopted at other
IEO places and other sectors
61
62. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Stakeholder / opinion former input
• Initiative well received
• Consumer orientation and engagement helped the credibility and
practicality of the solution
• Staff engagement with the project appreciated
• Suggested more emphasis on pre-purchase signposting
• Suggested extending BMI customisation on web/index facility
• Overall, fun/engaging aspect of approach may well succeed in
building consumer resonance over time
62
63. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Other validation
• “Bar chart” nutrition information approach tested with the
consumer in over 300 McDonald’s restaurants outside Europe
- 4 cities in USA
- In Colombia, Latin America
- In Hong Kong, Asia
• Tested nutrient “icons” for cultural and ethnographic sensitivity in
over 100 countries worldwide
• Pilot market versus control group sales impact test in UK, Spain
and USA revealed not to be a sales driver, however reached its
objective to increase awareness in nutrition.
63
64. PROCESS: PHASE 3 “PILOT TEST”
Testing nutrient icons for cultural sensitivity
• With iconographic and ethnographic experts in 100 countries
worldwide: ENLASO
• Reality check with local representatives in global advertising agency
networks through Leo Burnett, TBWA and DDB International;
• Course-correction in creative route made where necessary;
• Example of “course-correct” feedback.
Fiber Icon Option #2 – This icon generated many negative comments,
primarily centered around associations with “scary” aliens (47 countries).
According to the supplier, this is a relatively rare result in that so many countries
came up with similar associations. Their theory is that “this is the influence of
pop culture spread through the media, because the alien connotation was so
consistently prevalent not just in one area, but in countries representing all parts
of the globe. “ The icon apparently symbolized Greenpeace activity in Russia
and ghosts in the Virgin Islands.
64
65. PROCESS: PHASE 3 “PILOT TEST”
Learning: Sales tests in UK, Spain and USA
• During operational pilots (in over 300 restaurants) sales and product-
mix effects were monitored to identify any significant impact of the
presence of nutritional information on business patterns;
• Sales and product-mix movement were monitored against a control
group of comparable size;
• Influence of nutritional labelling (over a three month period) on sales
and product-mix was not uniform, although influence over incidence of
some product categories was more marked than with others.
65
66. PROCESS: PHASE 3 “PILOT TEST”
Nov 2005, a workshop was organised under auspices of EU Platform on Diet,
Physical Activity and Health: Approach and insight made openly available to
IEO/food industry entities
66
67. GLOBAL LAUNCH OF NII
• Launched 9 February 2006 in Italy in conjunction with the Torino Olympic
games;
• NII is now rolled out in EU 25 (5788 restaurants), Romania and Bulgaria
and 14 other European non-EU markets representing a total of over 6,300
restaurants, reaching in excess of 10 million customers a day;
• In 2006 around 2 billion pieces of NII packaging will be used in European
restaurants (41 countries). In 2007 this figure will increase to
approximately 10 billion pieces;
• By end 2007 over 30,000 restaurants world-wide plan to have rolled out
NII.
67
68. NUTRITION INFORMATION PROJECT
Goal – revisited
A nutrition information system which:
- Is informative
- Has nutritional validity
- Is engaging
- Is fun and intuitive
- Non language dependent
- Industry and brand relevant
We think we’re getting closer!
68