Presented July 19, 2012 - Part of 2012 Collaborative Mentoring Webinar Series
Education Northwest/National Mentoring Center, Friends For Youth, Indiana Mentoring Partnership, Kansas Mentors, Mass Mentoring Partnership, Mentoring Partnership of Minnesota, Mentor Michigan, Mobius Mentors, Oregon Mentors and other partners are working together in 2012 to deliver this free monthly webinar series for mentoring professionals.
For updates about upcoming webinars, join and follow the Mentoring Forums at http://mentoringforums.educationnorthwest.org.
2. 2012 Collaborative Mentoring
Webinar Series
o Research
o Practice
o Innovation
Sarah Kremer Michael Garringer
Date: Third Thursday of every Friends for Youth National Mentoring Center
month.
Time: 10-11:15am
Pacific/11am-12:15pm
Mountain/12-1:15 pm
Marissa April Riordan
Central/1-2:15pm Eastern Strayer-Benton Mentoring Partnership of
Mobius Mentors Minnesota
Cost: Free
2
3. Good to Know…
After the webinar, all attendees receive:
Instructions for how to access PDF of presentation
slides and webinar recording
Link to the for resources,
contact information & opportunities to continue the
dialogue
Please help us out by answering 5 survey questions at
the end of the webinar.
3
4. Participate in Today’s Webinar
• All attendees muted for best
sound
• Type questions and
comments in the question
box
• We may invite you to “raise
your hand” during interactive
activities
4
5. Today’s Webinar
1. What is SIYM?
2. SIYM 2012 Theme
3. Panel Discussion with Research
Fellows
Q & A throughout
the presentation
5
6. The Duncan and Cindy Campbell
Professor for Children, Youth, and Families
with an Emphasis on Mentoring in the
School of Social Work at Portland State
University, and director of the PSU Center
for Interdisciplinary Mentoring Research.
Professor Keller studies the development
and influence of mentoring relationships in
school and community settings and the role
of parent involvement in mentoring
interventions. Prior to his Ph.D., he worked
for several years with a Big Brothers Big
Sisters affiliate in Seattle as a caseworker,
Tom Keller, Ph.D., supervisor, and program director. Email:
Institute Director siym@pdx.edu
6
7. Summer Institute on Youth
Mentoring (SIYM)
• Intensive week-long seminar featuring
research on youth mentoring
• Sessions led by a prominent researchers
• For advanced mentoring professionals in
program leadership roles
• Interactive discussions examining
implications for policies and practices
7
8. Each SIYM has a different theme
2012: Innovative and non-traditional
models of mentoring
– Research on programs that have distinctive
features (structure, intensity, duration, goals, etc.)
– Mentoring programs that incorporate services vs.
service programs that incorporate mentoring
– Exploring definitions and boundaries
– Mutual exchange and advantages/disadvantages
8
9. Director of Research for Partners for Our
Children, School of Social Work at the
University of Washington. Previously, Dr.
Eddy was a Senior Scientist with the
Oregon Social Learning Center, where he
conducted numerous studies of
interventions for parents and children in
conjunction with school systems, the
juvenile justice system, and adult
corrections. Dr. Eddy is the Principal
Investigator of an NIH-funded randomized
trial of the Friends of the Children program,
which provides paid professional mentors
Mark Eddy, Ph.D. for youth at risk for problems from
kindergarten through high school.
9
10. Friends of the Children
Who are Friends?
•Friends are full-time, paid professionals
•Friends receive extensive training, supervision, and
support
•Friends are diverse
•Friends work with an average of 8-11 children,
spending an average of 4 hours with each child every
week
•Friends maintain regular contact with each child’s
family
•Each Friend has a Bachelor’s or an Associates
Degree
•Friends all have previous experience working with
youth
•Friends stay at Friends of the Children for an average
of 7 years
10
11. Friends of the Children
Professional Mentoring Plus
Development •Mentoring opens up avenues
to support and advocate for the
•Training and supervision are youth.
an ongoing priority.
Community
Duration •Structure creates a community
•Endures across multiple of youth and adults that is
developmental transitions and present throughout childhood
milestones. and adolescence.
11
12. Sarah Schwartz is a doctoral candidate in
Clinical Psychology at University of
Massachusetts-Boston. She has published
studies investigating factors that influence
the impact of school-based mentoring,
including the relationship histories of
students and the duration of mentoring
relationships. She is completing her
dissertation on the National Guard Youth
ChalleNGe Program, in which youth select
an adult they know to serve as a mentor
during and after participation in a
residential training program.
Sarah Schwartz
12
13. National Guard Youth ChalleNGe
• Youth-Initiated Mentoring
– Pros and cons
– Implications for traditional
mentoring programs
• Mentoring as a strategy to
address erosion of effects
following residential programs
13
14. National Guard Youth ChalleNGe
• Intensive intervention
program targeting youth
ages 16-18 who dropped
out of high school
• Embraced YIM model in
early 1990s
• Currently operates in 26
states
15. Intervention Phases
Residential Phase Post-Residential Phase
(5 months) (12 months)
•Highly structured •Transition back into
programming includes GED, communities; educational,
life skills, job skills, health, and vocational, or military pursuits
leadership classes and (no military requirement)
activities •Supported by a mentor (YIM
•Frequently takes place on a model)
military base; quasi-military
model
16. Youth Initiated Mentoring
Youth nominate a non-
parental adult from their
existing social networks
to be their formal mentor
Youth Initiated
– Family friends, extended
Mentoring family members, neighbors,
teachers, afterschool
providers, members of
religious organizations etc.
17. Dr. Noblit is the Joseph R. Neikirk
Distinguished Professor of Sociology of
Education in the School of Education at
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill.
Professor Noblit has studied A+arts-
enhanced schools, charter schools, and
prison education for young offenders. He
currently is investigating how the Blue
Ribbon Mentor-Advocate program builds
the social networks of students and
enhances their social mobility through
mentoring, advocacy, enrichment, and
leadership training.
George Noblit, Ph.D.
17
18. Graig Meyer has been the coordinator of
BRMA since August of 1998. Through his
years in the program, Graig has learned to
love the special phenomenon of
introducing mentors and mentees who
would not know either other without the
role of this program. These relationships
knit a tighter and more healthy social fabric
in our community. Graig is a 2003-2005
William C. Friday Fellow for Human
Relations through the Wildacres
Leadership Initiative. Graig is a Phi Beta
Graig Meyer, Blue Ribbon Kappa graduate of the College of Wooster,
Mentor Advocate (BRMA) and was trained as a social worker at the
Coordinator University of Chicago's School of Social
Service Administration.
18
19. Blue Ribbon Mentor-Advocate
(BRMA) program
• Advocacy
• Comprehensive
services
• Explicit emphasis
on race and racial
identity
19
20. BRMA – 4 Program Elements
• Mentoring—Volunteer mentors with
students of color; 2 year min.
commitment
• Youth Leadership and Service
projects
• Advocacy-staff, parents and mentors
advocate with schools and
community agencies for student
supports and appropriate
programming
• Academic Support—tutoring
programs
20
21. BRMA – Evaluation Focus
1. How mentoring may
promote social mobility
2. How race affects both
mentoring and mobility
3. Characteristics of useful
mentoring relationships
between mentors,
mentees and parents
21
22. BRMA Evaluation – Multiple
Methods Design
• Quantitative study of
effects on school system
data (achievement,
behavior and other
markers.
• Qualitative study
involving observations of
program activities and
interviews with staff,
parents, mentees and
mentors
22
23. BRMA Evaluation – Findings
BRMA mentees have high HS graduation rates and Parents see it as effective in a
college going rates (only 1 student of 40 so far has
not completed HS and continued into post- situation where “race is everything.”
secondary). In 2009, 14.3% and 12.5% of college
students were African American and Latin@ ,
respectively (NCES).
BRMA mentees do not have significantly different Mentoring relationships are scary to parents who
academic outcomes than a matched sample. Thus have to give up their children. The relationships that
BRMA ‘works around’ the existing achievement gap work best are marked by honesty about valued
to keep students in school and motivated to attend (White dominant) cultural capital and a valuing of
post-secondary institutions. what parents provide for their children
(aspirational, social, navigational, resistant,
linguistic and familial capitals.
Parents, mentors and mentees all see BRMA Mentors are sources of social and cultural capital
as providing a valuable service. (“They do so that when coupled with advocacy can make some
much!) (“It’s an incredible program.”) things possible that would not otherwise have been.
23
24. Gabriel Kuperminc, Ph.D., is
Professor and Chair of Community
Psychology at Georgia State University.
Professor Professor Kuperminc studies the
processes of resilience and positive youth
development, and he has expertise on group
mentoring as well as the role of mentoring
within multi-component programs. Since
1999, he has evaluated the effectiveness of
Cool Girls, Inc., a comprehensive youth
development program that provides
mentoring, tutoring, and life skills training to
high risk, urban, preadolescent and early
Gabe Kuperminc, Ph.D.
adolescent girls.
24
26. Mentoring is a Flexible Strategy
Mentoring can begin
with an introduction to
a positive person,
coming to a positive
place or by accessing
a positive opportunity.
26
27. Future Webinars
August 16 - Back to School: Training Mentors Future Topics:
for Effective Relationships within Schools
September 20 –
This webinar will focus on how to prepare volunteers to create Closure
and sustain effective relationships within school walls. First, Dr.
Michael Karcher, will talk about ways in which school-based October 18 –
mentoring is different than community-based mentoring, both in Public/Private
practice and in the kind of impact it can have on youth Ventures
outcomes. Then, learn strategies and tips from expert trainers
and quality SBM programs to help you better prepare mentors November 15 –
for the school-based mentoring environment, which in turn will
help all participants feel more connected to each other, their Disconnected/
schools, and the programs. Opportunity
Youth
27
28. Good to Know…
After the webinar, all attendees receive:
Instructions for how to access PDF of presentation
slides and webinar recording
Link to the Mentoring Forum for resources,
contact information & opportunities to continue the
dialogue
Please help us out by answering 5 survey questions at
the end of the webinar.
28
Hello and welcome to this month’s Collaborative Mentoring Webinar Series. We’re going to get started on this month’s webinar, Pushing the Boundaries of Mentoring: SIYM 2012 Preview.
This is April Riordan, Director of Training & Community Partnerships for the Mentoring Partnership of MN. The Collaborative Mentoring Webinar Series is managed by several different mentoring t.a. providers. With us today supporting this webinar is Sarah Kremer, Mike Garringer, and Marissa Strayer-Benton. Mike will be moderating the interview with our panelists and Sarah & Marissa will be answering your questions and encouraging chat throughout today’s webinar.
Generic slide… show as folks log in to webinar… and sometimes periodically throughout. Also remind attendees through chat/QA As a reminder, after the webinar attendees will receive an email with information about how to download a copy of these slides and see the webinar again We use the mentoring forums as a place to chat, share resources, and more. At the end of today’s webinar, we’ll show you how to log into the mentoring forums. Also, we’re looking for your feedback. At the end of today’s webinar, please answer the short survey we’ll send to you.
We want this to be an participatory experience… a chance for you to interact with experts and peers in the field of mentoring. Use the question box to chat or to ask a question. You can do so at any time, and April and Sarah will que up your question or try to respond. We’ll also have a few exercise where we will encourage everyone to type an answer in the question box. Before we get started, we like to know who is with us on the webinar today. To find out more about you, we’d like to launch a series of polls: First: Poll #1 – Experience level (expert, experienced, beginner)? Poll #2 – What is your role? Mentoring program, T/TA, researcher, funder, other? # Registered: # Here now: Share how many youth served? Approximately:
SIYM is the Summer Institute on Youth Mentoring, held at Portland State University… kicks off next Monday. POLL: Have you ever attended the Summer Institute on Youth Mentoring? Chat/ask: Anyone attending next week?
Tom, could you talk a little bit about SIYM historically and especially some of the ways that folks around the country who are not attending can access the research and ideas being presented.
Show web page: http://www.pdx/.edu/youth-mentoring/
For Tom: Let’s dive right into this year’s theme: Why did you feel it was important to have this focus on innovation and explore “edges” of mentoring? What do you think the broader field learns from looking at different applications of, and contexts for, mentoring? For the panel: How do you see your research fitting into this theme? Talk a bit about how the programs you are studying expand our view of what mentoring is and what it can achieve.
For Mark: You are studying Friends of the Children… What do you think we can conclude about their approach to mentoring? Obviously, most mentoring programs are not going to offer services that are that intensive or long-term, but what can traditional mentoring programs learn from their approach? Are there bits of what they do that are transferable? For Mark: What implications do you think your research has for policymakers? Is Friends of the Children offering hints as to how we can meet some challenges for certain youth?
POLL and/or CHAT: How do you feel about paid mentors? http://friendspdx.org/it-works/research-results
For Sarah: I’ve always been curious about how to do mentoring in a residential setting like the ChalleNGe program does… those youth are often not happy to be there and engage adults! But ChalleNGe seems to have found a way around some of those relationship barriers. Can you talk about how youth get their mentors and what they do in the program? For Sarah: What do you think other mentoring programs can learn from the ChalleNGe approach? What beyond the youth-initiated match might other programs be able to replicate or adapt?
For George/Graig: You have a very interesting focus in your research on the Blue Ribbon program: examining how the program promotes the social mobility and capital of youth of color. Explain a little bit about what this social capital is and how their mentors facilitate it?
For George/Graig: Recent research by David DuBois and others has pointed to mentors with an advocacy focus being really successful. Tell us a bit about how Blue Ribbon mentors act as advocates. And is that a role that mentors in other programs can learn to fill?
For all panelists: What do you wish you knew, but don’t yet, about the programs you are studying? About mentoring in general?
For entire panel: Is our definition of mentoring becoming less rigid? Seems like we spent a decade or so narrowing what a mentor, and mentoring, is. Now recent research seems to be indicating that mentoring is far more flexible and adaptable than maybe we thought. Is it time to expand our notions of what a mentor is?
We are talking a lot here about innovation and new ideas in mentoring. What is one innovation currently happening in the field you’d like to see studied more? What’s an innovation you’d like to see in mentoring? Let’s invent a new program model here on the webinar!
Generic slide… show as folks log in to webinar… and sometimes periodically throughout. Also remind attendees through chat/QA As a reminder, after the webinar attendees will receive an email with information about how to download a copy of these slides and see the webinar again We use the mentoring forums as a place to chat, share resources, and more. At the end of today’s webinar, we’ll show you how to log into the mentoring forums. Also, we’re looking for your feedback. At the end of today’s webinar, please answer the short survey we’ll send to you.
Sarah will log on and go to Collaboration page
If want to learn more about the collaborative and how it works, stay on the line and we will field questions.