Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)

22 de Apr de 2015
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)
1 de 92

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Electro chemistryElectro chemistry
Electro chemistryLALIT SHARMA
 electrochemistry electrochemistry
electrochemistryJyotiPrakashRay1
Basic concepts in electrochemistryBasic concepts in electrochemistry
Basic concepts in electrochemistryDagobert Aldus
Basic potential step and sweep methodsBasic potential step and sweep methods
Basic potential step and sweep methodsGetachew Solomon
ElectrochemistryElectrochemistry
Electrochemistrywadhava gurumeet
Ap ch 18 electrochemistry pptAp ch 18 electrochemistry ppt
Ap ch 18 electrochemistry pptkhawaja taimoor taimoor rasheed

Destaque

Nernst EquationNernst Equation
Nernst Equationguestaed04c
Spectrophotometry: basic concepts, instrumentation and applicationSpectrophotometry: basic concepts, instrumentation and application
Spectrophotometry: basic concepts, instrumentation and applicationBasil "Lexi" Bruno
New chm 152_unit_9_power_points-sp13New chm 152_unit_9_power_points-sp13
New chm 152_unit_9_power_points-sp13caneman1
corrosion and surface chemistrycorrosion and surface chemistry
corrosion and surface chemistryAmiNa Russicada
New chm 152_unit_8_power_points-sp13New chm 152_unit_8_power_points-sp13
New chm 152_unit_8_power_points-sp13caneman1
Simple voltaic cell and Chemical CellsSimple voltaic cell and Chemical Cells
Simple voltaic cell and Chemical CellsZhong Yuan

Similar a Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)

electrochemical cells.pptxelectrochemical cells.pptx
electrochemical cells.pptxaqsashafique7
Module 2_S7 and S8_Electrochemical Cells.pptxModule 2_S7 and S8_Electrochemical Cells.pptx
Module 2_S7 and S8_Electrochemical Cells.pptxAdittyaSenGupta
Chapter 1.1.pptxChapter 1.1.pptx
Chapter 1.1.pptxRobel Mehari
Chapter 19.4 : ElectrochemistryChapter 19.4 : Electrochemistry
Chapter 19.4 : ElectrochemistryChris Foltz
Chapter 21Chapter 21
Chapter 21Malcolm Harrison
ElectrochemistryElectrochemistry
ElectrochemistryCleophas Rwema

Último

ACTIVITY BOOK key 00.pptxACTIVITY BOOK key 00.pptx
ACTIVITY BOOK key 00.pptxMar Caston Palacio
Food Hygiene 1 - Intro to food hygiene.pptxFood Hygiene 1 - Intro to food hygiene.pptx
Food Hygiene 1 - Intro to food hygiene.pptxCJMcErlean
Generative AIGenerative AI
Generative AICorinne Weisgerber
Mass spectrometry- full lecture Mass spectrometry- full lecture
Mass spectrometry- full lecture DRZIAMUHAMMAD2
SHEYA DEY - 23COMD18 & 33 & 57  ACCOUNTING WITH DRONES.pptxSHEYA DEY - 23COMD18 & 33 & 57  ACCOUNTING WITH DRONES.pptx
SHEYA DEY - 23COMD18 & 33 & 57 ACCOUNTING WITH DRONES.pptxKumarasamy Dr.PK
Verb phrase and adverbs.pptxVerb phrase and adverbs.pptx
Verb phrase and adverbs.pptxAncyTEnglish

Tro chapter 18.1 & 18.3 18.9 electrochemistry spring 2015v4.6(1) (1)

Notas do Editor

  1. Start 03/17/14 here In other words all of Ch. 18 except Sec. 18.2 which we’ve already covered. Midterm exam 3 will be entirely redox and electrochemistry. Redox reactions using an external circuit to connect the oxidation and reduction half reactions.
  2. Some terminology This is why it was important to write half rxns An overall chemical rxn occurs, but the oxidation and reduction half rxns are physically separated into two “half-cells”. This is also why we spent time on balance redox rxns using the half-rxn method. Unlike rxns of an oxidizing and reducing agent in one soln, here we explicitly consider e-s because they flow in an external circuit between two solns, one containing the oxidizing agent, and the other containing reducing agent. Electrochemical rxns are a practical application of free energy changes and redox reactions. We can either input energy (non-spontaneous, deltaG >0) or get energy (spontaneous, deltaG<0) to do work from the free energy of chemical reactions in electrochemical cells, where electrons flow in an external circuit. From the concentrations and standard free energy changes, we can calculate the maximum amount of energy we can obtain from a spontaneous redox rxn or the minimum amount of energy we need to input to get a non-spontaneous redox rxn to occur.
  3. I am teaching this earlier than the order presented in Tro Chapter 18 In electroplating an oxidized metal ion is reduced to metal in the zero oxidation state using another metal surface as the electrode where reduction occurs. The reduced metal ions, thereby coat the surface of the “electrode” (jewelry or a chrome auto part). Tro has a figure 18.26 showing how to plate a spoon with Cu. Why you’d want to do this I don’t know.
  4. Don’t try to take this in all at once, follow the sequence of discussion. But I’d suggest drawing the diagram as I discuss it. Start with electrodes (go back and forth between this and the next several slides). battery could be similar to a car battery with a + and – pole, it provides the electrical energy to drive the chemical reaction in the electrolytic cell. The electrodes are made of inert material, i.e., they don’t react. They simply conduct electrons between the redox half-rxns and the external circuit. In this case we don’t need separate compartments because the rxn won’t occur without input of energy. A universal feature of all electrochemcal cells is + and – electrodes and a conducting solution (or mobile phase) of oxidant and reductant. Note the anode attracts the ANION (chloride), cathode attracts cations. For electrolytic cells, the anode is positively charged, because electrons are flowing away from it and towards the cathode, which is therefore negatively charged. At this temperature K is also a liquid. Need barrier to keep Cl2 gas from reacting with K metal (that’s the spontaneous rxn in the opposite direction, i.e., K “wants” to get oxidized and Cl2 “wants” to get reduced when they’re combined). The barrier needs to be porous to allow ions to flow form one side to the other, keeps charge from building up on one side or the other. If the barrier weren’t porous, K+ ions would accumulate at the anode side as Cl- is removed from the soln, and excess Cl- would accumulate near the cathode as K+ is reduced. The buildup of these ions on the “wrong” side would cause the rxn to slow and stop, deltaG depends on concentrations, Q, even for half-rxns. Could also have a salt bridge discussed later to neutralize the charges (these aren’t restricted to voltaic cells, see Tro EOC problem 19.89). Altough a salt bridge might be impractical in molten KCl.
  5. Go back and forth between this slide and the electrolytic molten KCl cell on the previous slide. Eletrochemical cells consist of metal electrodes connected by an external circuit and the electrodes are dipped into conducting solutions, containing substances which can get oxidized and reduced. The metal electrode must be made of an inert metal,meaning a metal that is not easily oxidized. Otherwise the electrode would get consumed during the electrochemical rxn. Platimum is a typical metal electrode.
  6. That’s why the battery. The battery “pulls” electrons out of the anode and “pushes” them thru the circuit onto the cathode and then to the reduction half-rxn.
  7. More terminology. Can be confusing. The statements about the cathode being where redn occurs and anode where oxidation occurs are ALWAYS correct. Remember cathode is the one feeding electrons into something more positively (or less negatively) charged (mnemonic: a cathode attracts cations), Anode is taking electrons away from something that’s negatively charged (anions). mnemonic: Anode attracts anions. The charges on electrodes are opposite for electrolytic and voltaic cells, they’re easier to envision in an electrolytic cell, not so easy in a voltaic cell. Best way to remember charges is use mnemonic for the electrolytic cells and they’re opposite for voltaic cells. Another mnemonic: current always flows to cathode.
  8. refer to the molten KCl electrolytic cell slide (repeated on next slide), except anode and cathode labels covered.
  9. Review starting 03/18/15 ask them to identify + and – charged electrode which is cathode and which is anode, which is the electrode at which oxidation and reduction occurs and what half rxns are occurring at each electrode, why need porous barrier (to keep excess Cl- from building up at cathode, and excess K+ at anode).
  10. This is a thermodynamically “uphill” rxn, I.e., deltaG0 >0 (ask sign of DeltaG), i.e., molten KCl will not spontaneously convert to K metal and Cl2 gas. The battery provides the energy to force the rxn to occur. There is another an electrochemical rxn going on in the battery that has deltaG<0 that drives the “uphill” redox rxn in the electrolytic cell. In fact overall deltaG for sum of the two rxns must be <0. We shall see that we can quantify deltaG using electrochemical cells. Anode: electrode at which oxidation occurs. Cathode: electrode at which reduction occurs. In electrolytic cells, anode attracts anions, cathode attracts cations.
  11. Now let’s try driving the same redox rxn but in a basic aqueous soln of KCl instead of molten KCl. The aqueous cell works at room temp. don’t need a porous barrier, because gaseous products diffuse out of soln instead of towards the other electrode and ions readily flow in water. Once again the electrodes are made of an inert material simply to conduct electrons. Electrodes shown as flat plates instead of rods, but same principle. Plates give more surface area. Actually Tro p. 851 states that, at least in neutral aqueous soln on the basis of redox potentials (discussed in later slides), H2O should be oxidized to O2 rather than Cl- to Cl2 at the anode. That is, H2O should be easier to oxidize than Cl- in neutral aqueous soln. The reason that Cl- is oxidized instead is due to something called overvoltage, a kinetic barrier, i.e., extra energy that must be added in order to oxidize H2O to O2 at the platinum or carbon electrode surface makes water harder to oxidize than Cl-, so the reaction follows the energetically “easier” (lower energy barrier) pathway, i.e. 2Cl-  Cl2, which doesn’t have an overvoltage (one reason is must remove four electrons from two O2- in water to make one O2, whereas only need to remove one electron from each of two Cl- to make one Cl2). In this cell, K+ is a spectator ion.
  12. Start 03/18/15 here “becomes basic” implies that OH- is being produced (and, therefore, that H+ is being consumed). In fact, the overall cell rxn produces excess hydroxide, so the entire soln in the cell becomes basic as the rxn proceeds.
  13. Sulfate turns out to be a spectator ion.
  14. Now what if Cl- isn’t present? “Becomes basic” implies OH- is being produced. Can’t be sulfate getting oxidized because sulfur is already +6 and won’t give up it’s oxygens. It’s also harder to reduce sulfate than H+. Sulfate is therefore a spectator ion in this rxn. What’s the only other source of oxygen in this soln? water. It’s easier to oxidize the O2- in water than the O2- in sulfate. The battery will thus drive whichever redox rxn is “easiest” in the solution. So in this electrochemical cell both K+ and sulfate are spectator ions.
  15. Start 3/19/14 here (half of a lecture had to be missed due to a computer glitch). Saunders 21M10VD1 water electrolysis Oxtoby Ch. 17.mov Ask why volume of gas is higher in right hand tube where H2 is generated. Note that the volume of H2 produced in the right-hand tube is ~2x the O2 volume in the left-hand tube as expected from the stoichiometry of the balanced eqn (recall 1 mol of any gas occupies the same volume as 1 mol of any other gas. Or moles of gas are proportional to volume of any gas, independent of what gas. If you want to become a billionaire and maybe solve the world’s energy problems, find a way to use sunlight to drive this non-spontaneous rxn. The H2 gas is essentially stored energy. Run the rxn backwards (need a spark) to get the energy back. Need a photosensitive electrode.
  16. Most easily thermodynamically, although there is sometimes an activation barrier too. We will later on see that this statement can be made quantitatively, not just qualitatively. That we can quantify exactly how much more easily one species can be oxidized or reduced compared to another.
  17. Memorize Faraday, it’s simply Avogadro’s number of electrons. Use the term “equivalent” because it refers to mol of electrons, not moles of substance. an equivalent = mol of electrons to distinguish from mol of reduced or oxidized species, e.g., it takes two reducing equivalents to reduce 1 Cu2+ to Cu0, but only 1 equivalent for Fe3+ to Fe2+. Write this on board.
  18. The conversion factor between Faraday and coulombs will be provided on an exam. Seems like an arbritary number, but that’s the convention. Coulombs are a measure of total electrical charge per mol e-. Note the equivalent to, not equal to sign between Avogadro’s number of e-’s and coulombs. It means that 1 mole of electrons is defined as have that amount of charge 96,487 coulombs). So It’s a conversion factor not an equality. Tro defines amperes on p. 852 or 3rd ed p. 867. As we shall see coulombs are related the energies of flowing electrons. You are probably familiar with amperes (or “amps”), It’s commonly referred to as current. it determines the amount of electricity (electron flow) per unit time flowing past a given point. can treat electrons just like molecules and moles, i.e., 1 mol e- = 6.02 x 1023 electrons. Maybe write this on board: Tro 3rd ed p. 867 points out that this definition of a Faraday means that the charge on a single electron is: 96,487/6.022 x 10-23 = 1.602 x 10-19 C, and also means that a current of 1A corresponds to 6.242 x 10-18 electrons/s passing a given point.
  19. an equivalent = mol of electrons to distinguish from mol of reduced or oxidized chemical species, e.g., it takes two reducing equivalents to reduce 1 Cu2+ to Cu0. So equivalents looks at the cell from the point of view of electron flow rather than the chemical rxn occurring in the cell
  20. This is an electrolytic cell. In this example, we arent concerned with the anode rxn, well do the anode rxn on next slide. Because 106 g/mole is atomic mass of Pd, 96,500 C/mol e-. note need two reducing equivalents to reduce one mole of Pd2+, that’s the (1mol e-/96.487Cx1mol/2mol Pd2+) so in other words to reduce one mol Pd2+ to Pd0 need to pass a total of 2(96,487 C), So this is the conversion factor between mol Pd and coulombs, Then calculate how many coulombs were transferred in 30 min at 3.20 C/s. so you can covert to mols Pd2+ reduced in 30 min.
  21. That is, this rxn occurs in an electrolytic cell. when Pd(II) is reduced to Pd0 at the cathode, water gets oxidized to O2 at the anode.
  22. Not responsible for in 2012 or 2014 or 2015, Tro doesn’t cover this. Draw a schematic of this cell on the board. Rectangle for impure Cu bar bigger than pure copper electrode, battery pumps electrons from impure Cu bar to pure copper electrode (the cathode (-)) write Zn, Ag, Au, Pt on rectangular copper bar. Show Zn and Cu getting oxidized, Ag, Pt, Au fall to the bottom.
  23. Not responsible for in 2012 or 2014. So the electrical energy goes into separating the Cu from the other metals. Can think of this as overcoming entropy. Mixture of metals has higher entropy more disordered that separated metals. See chromium plating, Oxtoby pp. 734-735.
  24. Not responsible for in 2012 or 2014
  25. If the two half-rxns weren’t physically separated they would react directly in soln. Amount of electrical energy generated by a voltaic cell is expressed in volts. Eg., 9 V battery in your smoke detector.
  26. Start 03/20/15 here Initial voltage, because as reactants are consumed, i.e., the cell discharges, voltage decreases. (However, for practical voltaic cells, i.e., batteries, there’s a way around this so the voltage can be maintained until the cell is almost entirely discharged). In principle, this cell potential should be independent of the H+ concentration because there are not H+ or OH- in the half reactions or in the overall redox rxn. This is the electron flow under standard conditions, where the dissolved species are at 1 M. The direction of spontaneous electron flow and voltage had to be measured experimentally at first (once it was reproducibly measured, the voltage was tabulated, so we can look up in a table as we shall see). We will see how this value was “chosen” to represent the numerical value of the voltage of this particular cell. And how we can predict the direction of electron flow from the tables. Need salt bridge so ionic charge doesn’t build up in the half cells, which would slow or stop electron flow., i.e., as Zn2+ builds up in the anode solution, Cl- flows in to neutralize it, and K+ flows in to compensate for the loss of positive charge as Cu2+ is reduced at the cathode. Chemistry: A Project of the American Chemical Society p. 679 makes an interesting point about salt bridges. The charge could just as easily be compensated in the cathode half cell if a Cu2+ entered the salt bridge instead of 2K+ flowed into the CuSO4 solution. However, this would lower the Cu2+ conc in the cathode half cell. Note the Zn electrode disintegrates as it gets oxidized.
  27. Each of the two half cells at which each half-rxn occurs are physically separated from each other (in separate containers).
  28. voltaic cell Saunders Ch. 21.mov This isn’t a very good movie. Better illustration on next slide. It’s still true that the cathode is where redn occurs (as in electrolytic cells), but the cathode is positively charged because the chemical rxn is spontaneous, i.e., the cathode “wants” electrons in order to reduce the oxidizing agent (the blue spheres), and conversely for the anode. (note the charges on the cathode and anode are opposite to those In an electrolytic cell, where electrons must be “pumped” onto the cathode to get a non-spontaneous rxn to occur).
  29. Refer to diagram on next slide Standard means standard conditions, which like for free energies 1 M for ions, 1 atm for gases, solids have unit activity. In this case the solid is the electrode. In this case the electrodes are not inert. They are going to react. Electrons always flow in the spontaneous direction in a voltaic cell. Can tap into the external circuit where the electrical energy flows to use this electrical energy to, for example, light a flashlight. It’s still true that the cathode is where redn occur, ie., it attracts cations (as in electrolytic cells), but the cathode is positively charged because the chemical rxn is spontaneous, i.e., the cathode “wants” electrons in order to reduce the oxidizing agent (the blue spheres), and conversely for the anode. (note the charges on the cathode and anode are opposite to those In an electrolytic cell, where electrons must be “pumped” onto the cathode to get a non-spontaneous rxn to occur).
  30. Start 03/21/14 here E0 stands for standard electrochemical potential in volts. (superscript 0 on E means under standard conditions, superscript zero on Zn). It’s a measure of how much energy flows in the external circuit during the electrochemical rxn. This voltage is a measure of the energy, i.e. the work you can theoretically obtain from this cell. As we shall see we can also relate this voltage to the free energy change for the reaction. Note this is under standard conditions. 1 M of ions (or 1 atm for gases). Voltage is different under non-standard conditions and the cell potential also changes as the reactants are consumed (rxn becomes less favorable in the forward direction).. Proof that Zn is “more active” than Cu. “less active” means it wants to stay the solid metal or go to the solid metal form when combined with a “more active” metal. The subscript (s) means solid metal implying an oxidation state of zero. Go back to the diagram of the Zn/Cu cell. Note the charges on the electrodes are opposite those for electrolytic cells, but the definition of cathode and anode are the same as in electrolytic cells. Note the sign of the E0cell tells which way the current flows and the energy difference between the two cells that provides the driving force for the current to flow in the external circuit.
  31. convention is the the anode (where oxidation occurs) on the left and cathode on the right. mnemonic to remember the correct way to write it, is put the charged (or oxidized forms) species in the middle of the diagram, electrodes on the ends. The concentrations are indicated after the soluble species. This particular one is for 1.0 M (corresponding to standard conditions), but the concentrations must be specified, because, as we shall see later, they affect the cell potential. So long as the redox half rxns don’t involve H+ or OH- don’t have to explicitly include H+ or OH- in this shorthand notation. A few slides ahead is shown a more complicated example from Tro pp. 826-827 where the electrode is inert Pt at which MnO4- is reduced to Mn2+.
  32. The direction of electron flow and voltage could not have been predicted, but was measured experimentally at first (probably more than a hundred years ago (until tabulated, then can look up in a table as we shall see). Cathode attracts cations is still vaiid nmemonic device for remembering which electrode is which in a voltaic cell. The cathode is always the electrode at which reduction occurs. The anode is the electrode at which oxidation occurs i.e., that oxidizes the reduced form (not necessarily anions, it’s sometimes the metal in the zero oxidation state. In the external circuit the anode is the electrode electrons flow away from, and to the cathode. Here again, the balanced half rxns and overall redox reaction don’t involve H+ or OH-, so the standard cell potential should be independent of pH. i.e., potential at pH 7 should be identical to that at pH 0. (Although at sufficiently high pH AgOH could precipitate).
  33. Go back and show the Cu-Zn cell to emphasize that Cu2+ got reduced, whereas in this cell the copper gets oxidized. So comparing varioius combinations of half cells tells the relative reducing and oxidizing potential of various metals or other redox agents. This direction of electron flow indicates that Cu is more “active” than silver. For Cu this is opposite to the Zn/Cu cell where zinc is more active than copper. More active means more easily oxidized, i.e., doesn’t want to stay “inactive” as the solid metal. Ag wants to go to the “less active” metal form. Another way of saying this is that Ag is a more “noble’ metal. I.e., the metallic form is less reactive than another metallic form (zero oxidation state), in this case Cu. More active and less active, typically apply to metals, not non-metals, even though the same concept is true for non-metals. In a voltaic cell whether a particular electrode behaves as an anode (where oxidation occurs) or a cathode (where reduction occurs) depends on the particular combination of half reactions. See Tro p. 831.
  34. That is, Zn2+ is easier to oxidize than is Cu or conversely, Cu is harder to oxidize than is Zn. Correlates with the “activity” of the metal is, so the more “active” metal is the more easily oxidized (the one that “wants” to donate electrons and become a cation, i.e., attain a positive oxidation state), the less active metal is more easily reduced, i.e., “wants” to be in the zero oxidation state.
  35. By assigning the SHE as E = 0.000 V, we arbitrarily “scale” all half cell voltages to the SHE. Oxtoby 6th ed Fig. 17.3. This is a half cell that we will “hook up” to another half cell and determine which direction the current flows spontaneously. The blue colored glass tube is open at the bottom, the purple glass tube passes is fused to the glass of the blue glass tube where it passes through the blue tube at the upper right, The purple tube is attached to a hose that continuously blows H2 at 1 atm through the bottom of the blue tube over the surface of the Pt black electrode. The H2 gas is represented as bubbles. The outlet for the H2 gas at the top left keeps the pressure at 1 atm. The H3O+ is often HCl, but only for couples where Cl- can’t be oxidized to Cl2. Imagine this half cell is connected via the salt bridge and external circuit to another half cell on the left (not shown). So hook it up, see which way electrons flow in external circuit. Put a voltmeter in the external circuit measure voltage (we will define voltage later), right now voltage can be taken as a measure of the potential difference between the SHE and any other half cell.
  36. Shown is the spontaneous direction of electron flow when the Zn/Zn2+ half cell is connected to the SHE half cell initial cell potential is +0.763 volts. E0cell > 0 is the established convention for the spontaneous direction when connected to the SHE, i.e., when H+ gets reduced or H2 gets oxidized. Note this convention is for the cell, not the half-rxn! When tabulate half cells it’s the direction of redn that used, so must reverse sign of this cell to get E0 = -0.763 for the Zn2+ + 2e-  Zn half cell potential.
  37. Remember this reaction is for 1 M H+; as defined by the SHE. Means under standard conditions, Zn is easier to oxidize than H2 or conversely H+ is easier to reduce than is Zn2+ 1 M H+ If you put a piece of zn into 1 M HCl the zn will get oxidized, but you can’t get any current from it unless you split it into half cells.
  38. Notice that electron flow out of the SHE half cell in this case, i.e., opposite to the Zn half cell. cell voltage under standard conditions is > 0
  39. For a voltaic cell E0 always > 0 indicates the spontaneous direction.
  40. Start 03/24/14 here These potentials are determined experimentally from cells like the ones on the preceding slides (typically measured vs the SHE since SHE is defined as zero V). We are simply breaking up the two electrode half rxns and referencing these to the voltage obtained when combined with the SHE. Standard electrode potentials are tabulated in the direction of reduction. Go back to the Zn/H2 cell. Note in the Zn/H2 cell, we wrote the Zn potential in the oxidizing direction, i.e., we reverse the half rxn, so we reversed the sign. The redn potential tells us that Zn is easier to oxidize than is H2. The Cu2+/Cu half cell potential has the same sign as the Cu-SHE cell potential because in that cell Cu2+ gets reduced, i.e., the same direction as written for the standard reduction potential. These potenitals tell us what would happen if we mixed Cu2+ directly with Zn2+ in a single solution. Ask what would happen. One of the great utilities of the reduction potential tabulations, is that for any two combinations of half reactions, the reduction potentials tell us which is the oxidizing agent and which will be the reducing agent EVEN IF WE MIX THESE REAGENTS DIRECTLY, i.e., without an electrochemical cell. (typically chemists would mix only the reduced form of one half-rxn with the oxidized form of the other half-rxn, so the net redox rxn would be even more favorable than under standard conditions (where both the oxidized and reduced forms are present at 1 M at the start of each of the half-rxns). Furthermore, the half-rxn potentials tell us the voltage under standard conditions for any combination of two half-rxns. I.e.,we can look up the half cell potentials.
  41. Note K is a solid at standard conditions (The electrolytic cell with molten KCl shown previously, was not under standard conditions). F22F- + 2e- half rxn has the highest value of Eo of any listed in Tro Table 18.1. Note also that reduction potentials in Appendix E are listed from highest to lowest. Half-rxns are always tabulated in the direction of reduction, I.e., e- is a reactant (on the left side). This means you can look at the table and immediately know that any half-rxn listed higher in the table is more oxidizing (better oxidizing agent) than anything underneath, that is the values are listed in order of best to worst oxidizing agents. So F2 is the best oxidizing agent and Li+ is the worst (-3.045).
  42. Posted on Blackboard.
  43. Start 03/23/2015 here. Already showed this table and gave quiz on it on 03/20/2015, but review this table. Also tell several students they used wrong half rxn, namely, the basic reduction of H2O half rxn instead of H+ to H2 pr redn of O2 (when I specifically said don’t consider oxygen assume anaerobic absence of air) on the quiz. Move this table down after show very positive to show very negative E half cells. Show arrows indicating trends as oxidizing or reducing agents. Get familiar with this table It will be provided on the exam, but without the blue and red arrows indicating stronger oxidizing agents etc. F22F- + 2e- half rxn has the highest value of Eo of any listed in Tro Table 18.1. Note also that reduction potentials in Appendix E are listed from highest to lowest. Half-rxns are always tabulated in the direction of reduction, I.e., e- is a reactant (on the left side). This means you can look at the table and immediately know that any half-rxn listed higher in the table is more oxidizing (better oxidizing agent) than anything underneath, that is the values are listed in order of best to worst oxidizing agents. So F2 is the best oxidizing agent and Li+ is the worst (-3.045). Note K is a solid at standard conditions (The electrolytic cell with molten KCl shown previously, was not under standard conditions). Important to note that these values are under standard conditions, but the table is still a useful guide for redox rxns even under non-standard conditions, for example, when no product is present in a single solution containing only the reduced form of one reagent and the oxidized form of a more easily reduced second reagent. Emphasize that the rule about more negative half-cell potentials being more reducing applies to the REDUCED form of the half-rxn, that is the reduced form is the better reducing agent than the reduced form of anything with higher half-cell potential. Similarly, for those half-cells higher up in the table, it’s the oxidized form of the half-rxn that is the better oxidizing agent than the oxidized forms in the half-cells lower in the table.
  44. Emphasize again, standard reduction potentials can be used as a quantitative measure of spontaneity whether the reaction is carried out in a voltaic cell or mix the reagents together in the same solution. Note you should already know the answer based on which metal is the “more active”. Precious metals are typically the less active unless mixed with another even more precious metal.
  45. Incorporate Tro Table 18.1 Show half rxns on next slide first. Write half rxns on board both in direction of reduction. Flip between this and the next slide for each step. Reason you don’t muiltiply potentials is that voltages are per electron. More positive E0 values are towards the top of the table, More positivre = more oxidizing, more negativer (or less positive) more reducing.
  46. Half rxns ALWAYS tabulated in the direction of reduction. Comparing half-cell standard reduction potentials for Ag and Zn, we see that Ag+/Ag has the more positive value, so we write its half-reaction first. Then reverse the Zn/Zn2+ half reaction and reverse the sign of its E0. Then balance and cancel electrons by appropriate multiplication of the half rxns. DON’T MULTIPLY THE POTENTIALS. THEY ARE PER ELECTRON. Great predictive power, Can determine whether a redox rxn will be spontaneous without having to carry it out and how much driving force, ie. for the rxn, i.e. how much voltage is possible to “get out” of the cell to do useful work.. This potential is correct whether in an electrochemical cell or in a single solution containing all the reagents. However, must get both half-rxns (and overall rxn) in good electrical contact so the rxn can proceed at an appreciable rate. Rxn spontaneous under STANDARD CONDITIONS! as the concentrations in the cell change, so will the potential. Note Ag is the less active metal meaning harder to oxidize (wants to be Ag not Ag+ compared to Cu. (Think: Ag corrodes less readily than zinc). Again: Emphasize that the rule about more negative half-cell potentials being more reducing applies to the REDUCED form of the half-rxn, that is the reduced form is the better reducing agent than anything with higher half-cell potential. Similarly, for those half cells higher up in the table, it the oxidized form of the half-rxn that is the better oxidizing agent than the oxidized forms of half-cells lower in the table.
  47. Assume acidic soln means 1 M H+, as defined by SHE. Note that in principle the H+ conc matters only for rxns than consume or produce H+. So, e.g., Ag/Zn rxn previously considered should be indepednent of H+ conc. In this example, H+ will occur in the MnO4- half-rxn.
  48. Must first figure out the correct half-rxns from the information given in the problem. There are three half-rxns involving MnO4- in Table 18.1 Assume acidic soln means 1 M H+, as defined by SHE. Note that in principle the H+ conc matters only for rxns than consume or produce H+. So, e.g., Ag/Zn rxn previously considered should be independent of H+ conc. In this example, H+ will occur in the MnO4- half-rxn. Actually, the way this particular question is asked, all you need to determine is which half-rxn is more positive (or less negative) E0, and that’s the spontaneous direction. You wouldn’t need to actually calculate the overall E0cell.
  49. This isn’t the same cell as calculated on the previoius slude. Maybe don’t use this slide or calculate this cell potential instead of that on the previous slide. This is Tro Fig. 18.4 p. 827 and shorthand notation p. 826 Note in this case we use an inert Pt electrode as the cathode because the MnO4- and Mn2+ are both soluble, they don’t plate out on the electrode.
  50. Write the two half-rxns on the board The arsenate half-rxn potential is not listed in Tro Table 18.1. Answer is Yes. Ntric acid a good oxidizing agent, one of the few reagents that will oxidize gold metal, even then need to mix with hydrochloric acid to complex the Au3+ to form AuCl3, i.e., drive the rxn towards Au3+ (Le Chatelier’s principle). The mixture of nitric and hydrochloric is called aqua regia.
  51. Oxtoby Fig. 17.14 better picture and explanation on next slide (Tro’s version). On iron we call corrosion, rust, but most non-noble metals are subject to the equivalent of rust. Requires moisture. Numbers indicate the redox reactions. Iron rusting is an example of a naturally occurring galvanic (voltaic) cell. A spontaneous redox rxn. Starts with pitting at so called defect regions in the iron that are more prone to oxidation where the surface coating has been damaged and becomes accessible to O2 and moisture. Reaction 1 is the anodic rxn: 2Fe  2Fe2+ + 4e-, which occurs at the pit in the diagram. (This is why rusting occurs at regions where the paint or other non-redox coating is chipped off the metal surface). The electrons removed from the iron anodic rxn flow thru the metal to the surface where dissolved O2 in water is reduced to H2O. This is the cathodic rxn labeled 2 in the diagram. The Fe2+ formed in the “pit” then migrates through moisture on the exposed surface, where a further (secondary) oxidation occurs, which actually forms the rust. This “secondary” oxidation, reaction 3 in the diagram, forms rust, which, consists of Fe2O3(s) combined with water dot nH2O. This rust forming rxn is strictly speaking not an electrochemical reaction, it’s a direct redox rxn between Fe2+ and O2, no electron flow through the iron metal occurs for the rust forming rxn. . The presence of surface water, thus, speeds up rusting by dissolving O2 and Fe2+ for the rust forming reaction and also the cathodic rxn 2. The reduction half rxn 2 is even easier in acidic water (ask why) such as can occur in the presence of dissolved CO2 originating from normal atmospheric CO2 or H2SO4 in the air from smokestack SO2 emissions. Salt water also speeds up corrosion because the dissolved ions of the salt conduct charge through water (akin to a salt bridge). This is why seagoing ships hulls are very prone to rusting.
  52. On iron we call corrosion, rust, but most non-noble metals are subject to the equivalent of rust. Requires moisture. Numbers indicate the three consecutive redox reactions leading to rust. Tro 3r ed p. 899 says: “A significant part of the iron produced each year is used to replace rusted iron.” Tro, Nivaldo J. (2013-01-03). Chemistry: A Molecular Approach, 3/e (Page 899). Prentice Hall. Kindle Edition. Iron rusting is an example of a naturally occurring galvanic (voltaic) cell. A spontaneous redox rxn. Starts with pitting at so called defect regions in the iron that are more prone to oxidation to Fe2+ where the surface coating has been damaged and becomes accessible to O2 and moisture. Reaction 1 is the anodic rxn: 2Fe  2Fe2+ + 4e-, which occurs at the pit in the diagram. (This is why rusting occurs at regions where the paint or other non-redox coating is chipped off the metal surface). The electrons removed from the iron anodic rxn flow thru the metal to the surface where dissolved O2 in water is reduced to H2O. This is the cathodic rxn labeled 2 in the diagram. The Fe2+ formed in the “pit” then migrates through moisture on the exposed surface, where a further (secondary) oxidation occurs, which actually forms the rust. This “secondary” oxidation, reaction 3 in the diagram, forms rust, which, consists of Fe2O3(s) combined with water dot nH2O. This rust forming rxn is strictly speaking not an electrochemical reaction, it’s a direct redox rxn between Fe2+ and O2, no electron flow through the iron metal occurs for the rust forming rxn. Here’s my edited version of Tro’s text 3rd ed p. 899 for this figure. A significant part of the iron produced each year is used to replace rusted iron. (Also see “Rust: The Longest War”). Rusting is a redox reaction in which iron metal is first oxidized to Fe2+ according to the following half-reaction: Fe(s)  Fe2+(aq) + 2 e- E= -0.45 V (note the sign reversal of E because half rxn is written as oxidation instead of reduction). This oxidation reaction tends to occur at defects on the surface of the iron—known as  anodic regions because oxidation is occurring at these locations—as shown in Figure  18.27 ▼ . The electrons produced at the anodic region travel through the metal to areas called cathodic regions where they react with oxygen and H+ ions dissolved in moisture. (The H+ ions come from carbonic acid, which naturally forms in water from carbon dioxide in air or acidic pollutants such as sulfuric acid from coal-burning power plants.) O2(g) + 4 H+(aq) + 4 e-  2 H2O(l) E0cell = +1.23V. So acid assists rust formation. The overall reaction has a cell potential of +1.68 V and is highly spontaneous. 2 Fe(s) + O2(g) + 4 H+(aq)  2 H2O(l) + 2 Fe2+(aq) E0cell= +1.68 V The Fe2+ ions formed in the anodic regions can migrate through moisture on the surface of the iron to cathodic regions, where they are further oxidized by reaction with more oxygen. 4 Fe2+(aq) + O2(g) + (4 + 2n) H2O(l)  2 Fe2O3 dot nH2O(s) + 8 H+(aq). Note This reaction 3 in the diagram is a direct redox rxn of dissolved Fe2+ and O2 in the same soln. Reaction 3 is, therefore, strictly speaking not an electrochemical rxn. Even a thin film of water is sufficient to mix Fe2+ and dissolved O2 for a direct redox rxn to make hydrated Fe2O3 (as depicted on the previous hidden slide). Rust is a hydrated form of iron(III) oxide whose exact composition depends on the conditions under which it forms. Consider each of the following important components in the formation of rust: • Moisture must be present for rusting to occur. (This is why airlines park their outdated airliners in the desert). The presence of water is necessary because water is a reactant in the last reaction and because charge (either electrons or ions) must be free to flow between the anodic and cathodic regions. • Additional electrolytes promote rusting. The presence of an electrolyte (such as sodium chloride) on the surface of iron promotes rusting because it enhances current flow. This is why cars rust so quickly in cold climates where roads are salted, or in coastal areas where salt water mist is present. • The presence of acids promotes rusting . Since H+ ions are involved in the reduction of oxygen, lower pH enhances the cathodic reaction and leads to faster rusting. Tro, Nivaldo J. (2013-01-03). Chemistry: A Molecular Approach, 3/e (Page 899). Prentice Hall. Kindle Edition.
  53. ? See Whitten p. 875 for tin plating. Can Either dip the cans in molten tin or electroplate a (use electrolysis) to reduce Sn2+ to Sn0 in on the surface of the steel can immersed in the Sn2+ solution. What gets oxidized. So if some iron were to get oxidized by O2 under the coating, the Sn would immediately re-reduce the Fe2+ back to Fe0. If the tin surface is breached the iron is even more easily oxidized than if there were no tin coating because of the difference in redox potentials of exposed vs unexposed areas of the iron. The “lower redox activity” of Sn(s) can be verified by going back to the redox potential table and pointing out that Fe2+ + 2e-  Fe (E0 = -0.45 V) is more negative potential (i.e., easier to oxidize) than is Sn2+ + 2e-  Sn (Eo = -0.14 V). Same is true for Fe3+ + 3e-  Fe, and Sn4+ + 2e-  Sn2+.
  54. So Mg2+ and Zn2+ are harder to reduce than Fe2+. If so, then conversely, the Mg0 and Zn0 are easier to oxidize than Fe0. The zinc blocks are bolted to the steel hull. Humphrey Davy invented these in the early 19th century, See Rust: The Longest War). Aluminum alloys are increasingly replacing Zn sacrificial anodes on ships and boat hulls. See . AL VS ZN ARTICLE.pdf http://www.cathwell.com/technical/cathodic-protection/zinc-vs-aluminium-anodes/ says aluminum is more efficient and economical than zinc as sacrificial anode. The Al3+/Al half reaction has a much more negative redn potential than Zn2+/Zn, so higher driving force for reduction of oxidized iron in the ship hull, which means better protective current distribution than Zn. Also, since aluminum has lower atomic wt than zinc and can donate 3e- instead 2e- per mol can put a much lower weight of aluminum on a ship than zinc and get the same protection. A recent fiasco involved ships built for the navy with aluminum hulls, but steel (iron) propeller shafts connected by salt water. The the Al reduced the iron and the hull started to dissolve. (See Rust: The Longest war).
  55. Zn, Mg, Al. Zn is most common sacrificial anodes. Whitten and Oxtoby both say Mg bar is most often used as sacrificial anode for iron pipes. It’s cheaper to periodically replace (sacrifice) the Mg bars than the iron pipe. Mg or Zn bars are also a common sacrificial anode for ships hulls. (Humphrey Davy invented these in the early 19th century, See Rust: The Longest War). Aluminum alloys are increasingly replacing Zn sacrificial anodes on ships and boat hulls. See . AL VS ZN ARTICLE.pdf What is the most likely oxidizing agent? It’s not the sacrificial anode or the less active metal! Ans. O2 from air, which can easily penetrate moist soil. That’s the definition of corrosion: oxidation of metal by O2. H+ could conceivably oxidize some of these metals, but it’s not nearly as powerful an oxidizing agent as O2, particularly since H+ is likely to be << 1 M in these situations). What metals could serve as sacrificial anode? Anything with more negative potential than Fe/Fe2+ or Fe3+. If O2 happens to contact iron and oxidizes some iron atoms, the sacrificial anode immediately re-reduces them, thereby preventing corrosion of the iron pipe. So the “cathodic” half rxn at the iron pipe is O2 + 4e- + 4H+  4H2O. And the anodic half rxn is Mg  Mg2+ + 2e-. ANOTHER VERY IMPORTANT REASON WHY SACRIFICIAL ANODES WORK: According to reduction potentials, Zn or Mg should get oxidized by O2 even more easily than iron, So why doesn’t the sacrificial Zn or Mg anode directly react with O2 rather than transfer electrons to the iron pipe? Answer is they do, that but these Zn and Mg oxidations are very slow compared to the flow of electrons from the sacrificial anode through the iron pipe to O2. Maybe also show the picture on the next slide as an in-class quiz, because the anode and cathode labels are blocked out the redox rxns occurring blocked out, but can be revealed by clicking on return. Or maybe as test question.
  56. What is the most likely oxidizing agent? It’s not the sacrificial anode or even the less active metal! Ans. O2 from air, which can easily penetrate moist soil. That’s the definition of corrosion: oxidation of metal by O2. H+ could conceivably oxidize some of these metals, but H+ is typically not at a high enough concentration to ( << 1 M in soil). What metals could serve as sacrificial anode? Anything with more negative potential than Fe/Fe2+ or Fe3+. If O2 happens to oxidize some iron atoms on the surface of the pipe, the sacrificial anode immediately re-reduces them, thereby preventing corrosion of the iron pipe. So the “cathodic” half rxn at the iron pipe is O2 + 4e- + 4H+  4H2O. And the anodic half rxn is Mg  Mg2+ + 2e-. Unlike the illustration on the previous slide, the Mg bar doesn’t need to be sticking above ground (see diagram on right). See spring, 2012 midterm exam 3 for another common example of a sacrificial anode. Hot water heater. ANOTHER VERY IMPORTANT REASON WHY SACRIFICIAL ANODES WORK: According to reduction potentials, Zn or Mg should get oxidized by O2 even more easily than iron, So why doesn’t the sacrificial Zn or Mg anode directly react with O2 rather than transfer electrons to the iron pipe? Answer is they do, that but these Zn and Mg oxidations are very slow compared to the flow of electrons from the sacrificial anode through the iron pipe to O2. An alternative way to view it: when sacrificial anode is attached to the less active metal (the iron pipe) all the current will flow from the sacrificial anode, and the metal to be protected becomes cathodic in comparison to the anode. This effectively stops the oxidation reactions on the metal surface by transferring the oxidation to the galvanic anode, which will be sacrificed in favor of the structure under protection. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanic_anode An alternative more expensive protection against corrosion is to connect the sacrificial anode and iron pipe with a low voltage battery that can essentially “pump” electrons from the sacrificial anode into the iron pipe. This way the sacrificial anode doesn’t;have to be connected directly to the iron pipe. See diagram on right.
  57. Galvanized nails are a common example. See Whitten p. 876. Even if Fe on the galvanized nail is exposed to air, it won’t oxidize as long as it is contact with the more easily oxidized Zn. Also see Tro 3rd ed p. 900. Unlike iron rust (Fe2O3dot xH2O), the ZnO is not “crumbly” and forms a hard outer protective layer. Similar protection is afforded on chromium-plated steel, such as on car bumpers or grilles, or trim. Chromium also oxidizes, but unlike iron, the oxides of chromium are very hard. A chromium coating rapidly forms a thin layer of very hard chromium oxide (the chromium version of rust), which protects the surface from further damage. Chromium’s oxidation layer is so shallow that it is transparent and you see what looks like unoxidized metal.
  58. Here again, a chip in the porcelain coating will cause the iron underneath to oxidize even more rapidly than without any coating.
  59. If you file a piece of aluminum, you can expose the shiny metal underneath the oxide. With time it will oxidize to the dull color of aluminum you are more used to seeing, forming a protective layer again. The aluminum version of rust except Al2O3 is protects the metal underneath, unlike iron oxide rust which does not. Discuss why aluminum beverage cans don’t corrode, given that Al should be capable of reducing O2 to H2O (refer to redox potential table on next slide). Two reasons: When solid Al is manufactured, it is exposed to air and it forms the solid aluminum oxide coating, which protects the unoxidized aluminum underneath. However, soft drinks in aluminum cans are acidic and Al should be able to reduce H+ to H2, thereby getting oxidized. H+ is capable of dissolving the Al2O3 coating and oxidizing the Al metal underneath. To prevent this ”corrosion” (aluminum analog to rust), the inside of the cans are coating with epoxy. (See “Rust: The Longest War”. This book described how aluminum beverage cans are made and what the manufacturer must consider about what beverage will go in the can in order to make sure it doesn’t corrode. Essentially says aluminum beverage cans may be the most engineered product in the history of the world, engineered to the ideal design of the can and the closest tolerances on all parts of the can). Also google “lasagna cell”. Lasagna or other high salt solution foods if heated in a steel pan and covered with aluminum foil and the foil is in contact with the pan, after a while small holes will form in the foil wherever it comes in contact with the solution around the food. The salty food (lasagna) is the electrolyte, the aluminum foil is the anode, and the steel pan is the cathode. If the aluminum foil only touches the electrolyte in small areas, the galvanic corrosion is concentrated, and corrosion can occur fairly rapidly. If you dip a piece of aluminum foil into the salty food without contacting the steel pan, corrosion will be MUCH slower because the circuit is not complete. End of responsibilities for mid-term exam 3.
  60. Al3+ + 3e-  Al E0 = -1.66 V, <<0 so H+ is capable of oxidizing Al. Most soft drinks are very acidic, ~10-3 M H+, but still capable of getting reduced to H2 by Al(s). (Even at pH 7 the 2H+  H2 Ehalf-cell = -0.44 V, so even 10-7 M H+ is still capable of oxidizing Al metal).
  61. Start 03/25/15 here Use modified for Nernst eqn intro CHE 1153 Spring, 2015 Pop quiz 6.ppt as Intro to non-standard conditions, I asked on the previous quiz whether Na(s) + in water containing 1 M HCl would result in a redox rxn. Based on the redn potentials, the answer is clearly yes, 2Na(s) +H+  2Na+ + H2(g). Notice this isnt really standard conditions, which requires 1 M Na+ and 1 atm H2, but the rxn is even more favorable to start with if mix only reactants because there are no products (recall Le Chatelier’s principle, take away products rxn proceeds in forward direction). Note the term “calculated”. They don’t have to be measured so long as the standard reduction potentials are known.
  62. Can consider (2.303RT/nF)logQ as a “correction factor” for E0 to non-standard conditions. Analogous to “correcting deltaG from deltaG0 to non-standard conditions. From electrical relationships you learned in Physics, 1 V = 1J/C. so converting the F to include units of V, which is the unit of electrode potentials. Nernst eqn similar in form to the equation for deltaG, Tro p. 834-835 and 838 shows that the Nernst eqn is in fact derived from the relationship between E and deltaG. We’re doing it in reverse order here. recall ln = 2.302log You’ll need only C/mol e- units for the Faraday constant for mid-term exam 3 (which are the units in the table at the end of the exam). For subsequent exams I’ll give you the J/V-mol e- units in the Table.
  63. Unless you want to calculate it every time! In this course you will be given Nernst eqn problems only at 25 C, i.e, 298K (but you will NOT be given the Nernst eqn). Note division by #electrons because voltage is per electron transferred. So you need to know or determine the number of electrons transferred in the half-rxn, the Q portion, or the overall cell rxn. Note that under standard conditions, where all concentrations are 1 M and solid activities = 1, the log = 0 and E = E0. Also not that since Q changes during the course of a reaction, E also changes.
  64. Also notice that E = E0 for any concentrations where the ratio of oxidized to reduced forms is 1/1
  65. Note the non-standard potential depends only on the ratio of reactants to products (raised to the power of the coefficients in the balanced eqn). Absolute concentrations don’t matter for the half-cell pot (but do matter for the capacity of the cell, i.e., how long the cell can maintain that potential while passing current through the wire to do external work). Note it makes sense that if you have higher ratio of product to reactant than under standard conditions, the half’rxn reduction potential shifts towards reactants, i.e, less positive, sort of akin to Le Chateleiers principle.
  66. Start 3/31/14 Note higher ratio of reactants to products means higher reduction potential. Remember E is under non-standard conditions. So either add to or subtract from the standard potential. Consistent with Le Chatelier’s principle.
  67. Note Q is dimensionless so don’t have to worry about putting conc and partial pressures in the same Q. Note also that partial pressures are prop to conc. So OK to mix partial pressures and conc in Q. Make sure to use n = 2 and to square [H+]. Note the standard potential Eo is 0.00 V. From the 0.333 P/[H+]2 ratio would qualitatively predict E more negative than E0 from Le Chatelier’s principle, i.e., “too much product” so the half-rxn has greater tendency to go in the reverse direction compared to standard conditions. Many biological redox rxns occur at or near pH 7, using the Nernst equation you can calculate that E = ~ -0.4 V for the 2H+ + 2e-  H2 half cell at pH 7. In fact you will see that any redox reaction involving one H+ and one e- changes by 0.0592 V per pH unit.
  68. Of course its overall redox rxns we want to predict. We never conduct only half-rxns. Need an electron donor acceptor pair. Hear again, note that since Q varies as the rxn proceeds, so does Ecell. (But E0cell does NOT change since its defined as the value under standard conditions).
  69. zinc-copper cell from Saunders 21M07AN1 Zn Cu cell potential depends on Cu conc.mov. Ask why cell potential increases. Cell potential increases because adding more reactant (recall Zn gets oxidized, Cu2+ gets reduced) doesn’t change too much. One reason why batteries can maintain a constant potential close to their standard potential for awhile, its prop to ln of the ratio. of conc rather than their absolute concentrations (of course, capacity of charge flow is greater the higher the concentrations). Why does Ecell change and by how much when more Cu2+ is added? Note that the Nernst equation predicts that Ecell = E0cell even under non-standard conditions whenever [Zn2+] = [Cu2+]. So if we had added an equal extra concentration of Zn2+ and Cu2+ to both half cells, the cell potential would not change from the standard cell potentials.
  70. What do we do with the solids in Q? Recall all solids have an activity ~ concentration = 1. Actually Ecell = 1.10V whenever the ratio of Cu2+/Z2+ conc = 1, no matter what the absolute conc. So the non-standard cell potential is determined simply by the ratio of Cu2+/Zn2+ conc. So Ecell would = 1.10 V if Cu2+ and Zn2+ were both, for example, 0.1 M or 3 M or 0.555 M, whatever the absolute conc so so long as they are equal to each other, i.e., so long as the Cu2+/Zn2+ = 1..
  71. The Nernst eqn has the same form for whole rxns as for half-rxns. Note the solid Cu and Zn don’t’ appear in the rxn quotient because their activities = 1. Make sure to divide the number of electrons transferred = 2! Note Oxtoby uses deltaE and deltaE0 in place of E and E0cell. They mean the same thing. E without 0 superscript means non-standard conditions.. Here again the increased Ecell compared to E0cell is consistent with Le Chatelier’s principle. Go back to the balanced eqn on two slides previous. Note if we had also increased the Zn2+ conc to 3 M, the cell potential would still = 1.10 V, i.e., = E0cell.
  72. This is called a “concentration cell”. The electrochemical potential due simply the difference in concentrations between the two half-cells. The next slide demonstrates how this non-zero potential arises. Tro 3rd ed p. 885 shows an equivalent diagram. Probably should have stated earlier, for a voltaic cell, E0 is for electron flow from anode to cathode in the external circuit because that’s the spontaneous direction. Tro 3rd ed p. 886 gives example of nerve cells as concentration cells. So in this concentration cell the anode with the lower concentration of Cu2+ generates more Cu2+ product and the cathode decreases the Cu2+ concentration as the rxn proceeds. The reaction tendency is towards equal concentrations of Cu in both cells, at which point the flow of electrons would stop.
  73. Start 03/30/15 here If both half cells contain equal Cu2+ concentrations (even if not 1 M), there’d be no net current flow in either direction because the half-cell reduction potentials would be the same (equal to E0 = +0.337), so Ecell 0.337 -0.337= 0. For current to flow in a “concentration” cell, the two half cells must have differing [Cu2+]. One way to think about why current flows and in which direction is by comparing the potentials (both consisting of Cu2+ + 2e-  Cu) in each of the half cells with the differing [Cu2+]. So with 1 M Cu2+, the half cell potential is E = +0.337 + (0.0592/2)log 1 = +0.337 V. In the case of 0.10 M Cu2+, E = +0.337 - (0.0592/2)log(1.00/0.1) =+0.307 V so, spontaneous direction give E0cell = +0.337(1M) – 0.307(0.1M) V = 0.30V, so must reverse the half rxn that has the less positive E, in this case, the 0.1 M Cu2+/Cu half cell, so that half cell is where oxidation occurs (the anode). Therefore, the 1 M Cu2+ half-cell must be the cathode (Cu2+ reduced to Cu metal). So there is “too much” Cu2+ on the cathode side compared to the anode side so the spontaneous direction is to remove some of the 1 M Cu2+ in the cathode half cell by reducing it to Cu0, i.e., Cu metal. (The solid Cu doesn’t appear in the rxn quotient because its activity = 1). So in a concentration cell the half cell with the lower concentration of the species undergoing the redox process is always the anode. This is a rxn that could not be carried out if these two solns were mixed together in a single beaker. You would simply have one soln with [Cu2+] = 1.1 M or actually since it would be 50:50 diluted, 0.55 M. Nevertheless this rxn is spontaneous in an electrochemical cell where the two half-cells with different Cu conc are connected by an external circuit. The flow of electrons would continue until the Cu2+ concentrations are the same in each half cell (by decreasing Cu2+ in the cathode half cell, and increasing Cu2+ in the anode half cell). The cell has a tendency towards making the concentrations of Cu2+ equal in the two half cells, at which point the reaction would stop because Ecell = 0. (Aside: Concentration differences can in principle be used in separate but connected compartments to drive even non-redox energy generating processes, e.g. osmotic pressure is a spontaneous process based solely on differences in solute concentrations on two sides of a membrane.)
  74. Clearly non-standard conditions. Since the half cells don’t include Sn or Fe metals, the electrodes in these half cells would have to be made of an inert material such as Pt.
  75. Notice must raise the conc to the power of the coefficients in the balanced eqn. snd make sure to use n = 2.
  76. Note this would also be the cell potential if we had mixed these concentrations into a single container (would be practically difficult since would have to make separate solns of one containing Fe2+ and Fe3+ and the other containing Sn2+ and Sn4+ and rapidly mix these together rather than connect the half cells via an external circuit. So this potential tells you about the spontaneity of the rxn even if you were to mix the reagents in a single container without electrodes. In fact, we can relate these potentials directly to deltaGrxn… Also recall Q changes during the course of rxn until Q = K and the rxn stops…
  77. Note for equating with deltaG it’s convenient to switch from 2.303log to lnK (less numbers to remember) so this is a different numerical form of the Nernst eqn, we switched from log to lnK so not 0.0592/n. There’s some VERY important info on this slide! Tro p. 837 has a nice succinct diagram of these relationships. The first two equations provide a DIRECT RELATIONSHIP between E0cell and K, so can calculate one from the other. The bottom equation provides a direct relationship between G0rxn and E0cell It is important to note that E0cell is NOT the potential at equilibrium. It’s the potential when reactants and products are in their standard states (1 M or 1 atm or unit activities). The potential at equilibrium is Ecell = 0.
  78. Modified From Chapter 18_LEC.ppt Remember K is unitless and remember equilibrium is NOT the same as standard states,
  79. You ARE responsible for these four hidden slides. It’s a good practice problem. Sometimes easier to measure potentials than equilibrium constants directly. Recall E0cell is the potential under standard conditiosn (equivalent to the free energy change when one mole (or 1atm) of reactants converted to product). But rxn will proceed only to the point that Ecell = 0, equivalent to Q = K. at that point the NET electron flow in the external circuit is zero, (doesn’t necessarily mean electrons aren’t flowing though!). In general when when Q = K should have double directional arrow to indicate equilibrium, but before that electrons and redox occur in only one direction, that with E0cell >0. Turns out for this particular cell, E0cell is so large and deltaG so negative that for all practical purposes it’s irreversible.
  80. In principle there should be an equilibrium sign for the net rxn, but it lies far to to the right, so it’s essentially irreversible (see next slide).
  81. Note E0cell > 0, deltaG<0. Standard cell potentials and standard free energies of reactions will always have opposite signs. J/V-mol e- is an alternative unit for the Faraday (given in exam table). That is, get 96,487 J per V per mol e- passed. Note since multiply by 2 mol e- the deltaG is per mole of the balanced redox rxn.
  82. The ratio of Pb2+/Cu2+ at “equilibrium” is so large that for all practical purposes the rxn is irreversible. makes sense because Pb is more active than Cu based on relative E0 of the half-rxns. This can only be true when the ions are in redox contact with their respective solids. Make sure you use the correct units for R from the table on exams.
  83. (Copied from slide 85 Whitten ch. 21) Note, implicit that Zn0 is present, otherwise it couldn’t be oxidized. As soon as some Ag0 is formed, it’s activity becomes 1. The ions are at non-standard concetrations. The eqn relating Ecell to deltaG and Q applies under non-standard conditions, deltaG = -nFEcell, so first calculate E0cell then Ecell, the deltaG.
  84. Equilibrium constants do not change with reactant concentration! Note the large value of K means this rxn is essentially irreversible under almost any conditions. Note final delta G0rxn value is changed from J to kJ
  85. So Q <<K. but the ratio is > 1 so it’s already “started towards equilibrium” from standard conditions. That’s why Ecell is less than E0cell. Due to the exponential relationship between K and E0cell or Q and Ecell, a small difference between E0cell and Ecell makes a big difference in Q vs K. This is why batteries take a long time to run down, because even if Q changes appreciably, Ecell doesn’t. Tro’s explanation on p. 840 2nd ed or p. 884 3rd ed seems incomplete or ambiguous. Just because Q < 1 doesn’t predict the spontaneous direction of the electrochemical rxn in every case, it predicts only that it’s “more spontaneous (or less non-spontaneous)” in the forward direction than under standard conditions. Recall from Chapter 17 when K < 1, reactions are non-spontaneous in the forward direction IN THE STANDARD STATE, i. e., when all reactants and products are 1 M or 1 atm. If everything is 1 M or 1 atm, then Q = 1 (and > K) so the reaction proceeds in the REVERSE direction until Q = K. Can also view this as an example of Le Chatelier’s principle, when Ecell < E0cell, Q < K, so equilibrium shifts to the right. i.e., towards equilibrium and Ecell continues to decrease as Q increases until Ecell = 0 and Q = K
  86. Note no superscript 0 because rxn is under non-standard conditions. So same conclusion as on last slide, Q << K, but the ratio is > 1 so it’s already “started towards equilibrium” from standard conditions. That’s why Grxn is less than G0rxn. Due to the log relationship between Ecell and Q, a relatively small difference between E0cell and Ecell makes a relatively large difference in Q vs K. This is one reason why batteries take a long time to run down, because even if Q changes appreciably, Ecell doesn’t. In this example, the difference between E0cell and Ecell is only 0.022 V, yet this represents a change from 1 M of both soluble redox species to 0.5 M and 0.3 M.
  87. Start 04/07/14 here (last Friday no lecture) Start 04/01/15 here
  88. The solids are in a moist paste. Batteries often use half-rxns where both sides of the half rxn are solids or pure liquids (their activties = 1 as long as there’s any there). So the cell potential doesn’t change.
  89. The dry cell potential is ~1.25 V.
  90. Mn4+ in MnO2 gets reduced to Mn3+ by H2. These secondary rxns remove the redox products, thereby “pulling” the rxn in the forward direction.
  91. Orange is the porous separator. Probably serves the function of a salt bridge in a galvanic cell.
  92. Alkaline battery: This chemistry is also common in AA, C and D dry cell batteries. The cathode is manganese dioxide and the anode is a zinc powder. It gets its name from the potassium hydroxide electrolyte, which is an alkaline substance. alkaline battery Saunders Ch. 21 (Converted).mov There are several different configurations of alkaline dry cells, but they all operate by the same half-rxns. Tro says the “most inexpensive” have an outer Zn case that acts as the anode as shown on the figure on the right side of this slide. The figure on the right hand side is from Tro 2nd ed Fig. 18.15 p. 843 or 3rd ed p. 887. The movie on the left reverses the positions of the Zn and MnO2 KOH paste cathode inside the battery but the anode and cathode are the same orientation (i.e., oxidation rxn electrons exit out the bottom (the – charged anode). The KOH is typically referred to as a “moist paste”, the cathode reaction is MnO2 (the graphite rod is what conducts the electrons) (see http://wps.prenhall.com/wps/media/objects/4974/5093961/emedia/ch18/Batteries/f7bl/Batteries.html). The “Absorbent separator” in Tro’s diagram is the equivalent of a salt bridge. Also, the product of the MnO2 reduction should really be written as MnO(OH)(s) as shown on Tro 3rd ed p. 887 (see next slide). Similarly, the anode product is Zn(OH)2 not ZnO. Interesting discussion about dry cell battery leaks on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alkaline_battery Alkaline batteries are prone to leaking potassium hydroxide, a caustic agent that can cause respiratory, eye and skin irritation.[This can be reduced by not attempting to recharge disposable alkaline cells, not mixing different battery types in the same device, replacing all of the batteries at the same time, storing in a dry place, and removing batteries for storage of devices. All batteries gradually self-discharge (whether installed in a device or not) and dead batteries will eventually leak. Extremely high temperatures can also cause batteries to rupture and leak (such as in a car during summer). The reason for leaks is that as batteries discharge — either through usage or gradual self-discharge — the chemistry of the cells changes and some hydrogen gas is generated. This out-gassing increases pressure in the battery. Eventually, the excess pressure either ruptures the insulating seals at the end of the battery, or the outer metal canister, or both. In addition, as the battery ages, its steel outer canister may gradually corrode or rust, which can further contribute to containment failure. Once a leak has formed due to corrosion of the outer steel shell, potassium hydroxide absorbs carbon dioxide from the air to form a feathery crystalline structure of potassium carbonate that grows and spreads out from the battery over time, following along metal electrodes to circuit boards where it commences oxidation of copper tracks and other components, leading to permanent circuitry damage. The leaking crystalline growths can also emerge from seams around battery covers to form a furry coating outside the device, that corrodes any objects in contact with the leaking device. Not responsible for: Chemistry a Project of the ACS p. 696 has good discussion of amount of work and how long available from an electrochemical cell, relevant to batteries.
  93. You won’t find these half rxns in the table of reduction potentials. Mn(IV) gets reduced to Mn(III). Alkaline dry cells give steadier voltages because the net redox rxn involves only solids (water does not get oxidized or reduced), whose activities don’t change (effectively = 1) until a substantial fraction of the Zn anode and MnO2 are consumed. The use of solid redox species also gives the batteries a longer shelf life, that is they don’t spontaneously discharge as readily as non-alkaline dry cells.The KOH is also mostly a solid at the high concentrations in the battery, i.e., the reactant in the anode half-rxn and product of the cathode half rxn is KOH in a “moist paste”. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alkaline_battery The half-reactions are: Zn(s) + 2OH−(aq) → ZnO(s) + H2O(l) + 2e− [e° = 1.28 V] 2MnO2(s) + H2O(l) + 2e− → Mn2O3(s) + 2OH−(aq) [e° = +0.15 V] Overall reaction: Zn(s) + 2MnO2(s) → ZnO(s) + Mn2O3(s) [e° = 1.43 V]
  94. Not responsible for in 2015. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zinc%E2%80%93air_battery says the mercury has been completely eliminated from these batteries so they’re now called zinc-air batteries. Zn/Hg anode and graphite coated with HgO cathode. Anode rxn same as in alkaline dry cell. Half-rxns from Whitten p. 724. Gas vent for volatile Hg? Production of Hg(l) not good for the environment, but the amount of Hg in these batteries has been reduced dramatically since they were first introduced. Maybe substitute slide on NiMH rechargeable battery Tro 3rd ed. p. 888.
  95. “spongy” to give large surface area, which makes charge transfer more efficient.
  96. Ask what rxns are occurring at the + and – electrodes. Which is anode and cathode? See Oxtoby Fig. 17.9. and See end-of-chapter problem 17.43 and Tro Figure 18.19 p. 843. The lead storage battery is a true “battery” in the sense that it consists of a series of six individual cells (see Tro end-of-chapter problem 17.43) connected anode to cathode in series, thus creating a “battery” of cells. Only 3 cells are shown in the figure. The voltage of the battery is the sum of the voltages of the individual cells. So to obtain higher voltage connect more cells in series. A single cell with the same amount of material as six cells would have a voltage of only one-sixth of the six-connected cells (i.e., only the single cell voltage), but would be able to deliver a larger number of coulombs (but not more current!) than any one of the smaller single cell. The large size of car batteries (i.e., the large amount of electrochemically active material, Pb and PbO2) and six cells connected in series and the large surface area allows the six-cell battery to deliver more amps (important on a cold morning) than would a single anode and cathode with one-sixth of the material. The use of lead and the large size are why car batteries are so heavy. Similarly, the larger surface area would allow more efficient re-charging. Each individual cathode/anode has E ~2V, so six connected in series delivers 12V.
  97. From Chapter 18_LEC.ppt, except I added x 6 = ~12 V or Tro 3rd ed p. 887. See next slides for more details of how this battery works. spongy lead gives it a high surface area for more efficient ionic conduction. So do the grids, plus more efficient ion flow between electrodes. The Pb and PbO2 electrodes and sulfuric acid are consumed during discharging. The products of both half rxns are the same, PbSO4. Comproportionation is the opposite of disproportionation. Thus, during the discharge phase (starting the car or operating electrical devices in the car with the engine of), both electrodes become coated with PbSO4(s) Notice once again redox agents are all solids so activities = 1 Don’t really need a salt bridge, because reactants and products are both solids, won’t diffuse, the electrolyte is what keeps the charges balanced.
  98. The Pb and PbO2 electrodes and sulfuric acid are consumed during discharging. The products of both half rxns are the same, PbSO4. This is called a conproportionation rxn. Two Pb oxidation states converting to one oxidation state. This is the opposite of a disproportionation. Notice once again redox agents are all solids so activities = 1
  99. Lead acid storage battery21M08AN4.mov, during discharge, PbSO4 forms a coating on both electrodes, at the cathode (the green electrode) from reduction of PbO2 and at the anode from oxidation of the spongy Pb.
  100. You all probably know that car batteries have Ecell = 12V. If a voltage >12V is applied tp the battery (as by the alternator), the battery is recharged in an electrolytic process. After many thousands of discharge/charge cycles the battery fails because PbO2(s) flakes off the Pb electrode.
  101. lead acid battery recharge 21M12AN1.mov,during recharging the the cell becomes electrolytic, and the PbSO4 coating is removed from both electrodes, at the cathode (the purple electrode) by reduction back to Pb and at the anode (green electrode) by oxidation to PbO2.
  102. Tro 3rd ed p. 888-889 has a good description of a Li ion battery, operation is more complicated than described but still a good description of the basics. Figure: 18-17 Title: Lithium Ion Battery Caption: In the lithium ion battery, the spontaneous flow of lithium ions from the graphite anode to the lithium transition metal oxide cathode causes a corresponding flow of electrons in the external circuit. Lithium ion battery has a high “energy density” mostly because lithium is one of the lightest elements. Certainly the lightest metal. See Table 18.3 Tro 3rd ed p. 888 “Briefly, you can think of the operation of the lithium battery as being due primarily to the motion of lithium ions from the anode to the cathode inside the battery. The anode is composed of graphite into which lithium ions are incorporated between layers of carbon atoms. Upon discharge, the lithium ions spontaneously migrate to the cathode, which consists of a lithium transition metal oxide such as LiCoO2 or LiMn2 O4 . The transition metal is reduced during this process. Upon recharging, the transition metal is oxidized, forcing the lithium to migrate back into the graphite ( Figure 18.17 ▶ ). The flow of lithium ions from the anode to the  cathode causes a corresponding flow of electrons in the external circuit. Lithium ion batteries are commonly used in applications where light weight and high energy density are important. These include cell phones, laptop computers, and digital cameras.Tro, Nivaldo J. (2013-01-03). Chemistry: A Molecular Approach, 3/e (Page 889). Prentice Hall. Kindle Edition. “
  103. Not responsible for in 2014 or 2015
  104. See Tro 2nd ed p. 845. (p 889 3rd ed). The reagents are very light so saves weight. Could conceivably use solar energy to “split” water into H2 and O2, i.e., the reverse of the fuel cell rxn. Water is an inexhaustible reagent for this rxn.
  105. See C&E news fuel cell battery for cars p. 18.pdf Excess H2 and O2 flowing out the top can be recycled back into the fuel cell. The product in both half cells is water. So this is a non-polluting voltaic cell, but as stated on the previous slide, the manufacturing of H2 requires energy, which may be polluting depending on the energy source. Another reason to find a way to “split” water into H2 and O2 (i.e., the opposite rxn from that shown here) using solar energy. Maybe discuss supercapacitors see C&E News supercapacitors p. 20-21 charging cycles wrong http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/whats_the_role_of_the_supercapacitor
  106. Most living organisms get their energy from redox reactions. We covered this in terms of free energies when describing Biological Energy from Chemical Rxns Chapter 17 PP lecture slides. However, since many if not most biological energy conserving and generating reactions are redox, it is often more convenient to consider these rxns in terms of redox potentials… This includes getting energy from the food we eat by aerobic respiration from the equivalent of combustion of organic molecules. Recall combustion of organic molecules is a redox reaction. (ask what’s getting oxidized and reduced)
  107. Modified from CHE 6973 biogeochemical cycles lecture The prime superscript on the E0 on the y axis in indicates that the E0 values are for pH 7, not pH 0. Most living cells operate near pH 7 and (perhaps with a few exceptions) cannot survive pH 0. Notice the H+ to H2 potential is < 0 at pH 7. Might be a good class exercise or exam question to use the Nernst eqn to calculate the H+/H2 potential at pH 7. Use Nernst eqn in the form you should have memorized: E = E0 - 0.0592/n(logQ). Remember the E0 is at 1 M H+ so need to correct for changing H+ to 10-7 M. In the Nernst eqn 10-7 is in the denominator and still 1 atm H2, so the “correction” to E0 for pH 7 is: (0.0592/2)log(1atm/[10-7]2) = (0.0592/2)log1014 = +0.42 V, since E0 = 0.00 V, then E = -0.42 V is the reduction potential for the H+/H2 half-cell at pH 7. Common examples of energy generating biological rxns are glucose, a carbohydrate, reducing dioxygen. Some microorganisms can grow in the absence of O2 (in fact, they were first living organisms to developed on earth, prior to photosynthesis that generated atmospheric O2). glucose reducing nitrate (in some bacteria). In fact, if there is a spontaneous chemical rxn deltaG<0, that can occur from naturally occurring substances, there is a good possibility that some organism that gets its energy from it. Photosynthesis essentially the opposite of respiration, uses light energy to drive (electrolysis) a “cell” with Ecell <0, i.e., CO2 to glucose and H2O to O2.
  108. Not responsible for items 9-11 for midterm exam 3 (but will be for midterm exam 4).
  109. Not responsible for items 12-14 for midterm exam 3 (but will be for midterm exam 4)