SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 10
Brown vs. board of education  1954 US Supreme Court case Lucy Eccleston Norvall
Background: Plessy v. Ferguson After the end of the American Civil War in 1865, during the period known as Reconstruction, the government was able to provide some protection for the civil rights of the newly-freed slaves.  Reconstruction abruptly ended with the Compromise of 1877 and federal troops were withdrawn, southern state governments began passing Jim Crow Laws that prohibited blacks from using the same public accommodations as whites.
Plessy v. Ferguson (Continued) Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation  under the docterine of “separate but equal“ "Separate but equal" remained standard doctrine in U.S. law until Brown Vs. Board of Education.
Plessy vs. Ferguson In 1890, the State of Louisiana passed Act 111 that required separate accommodations for African Americans and Whites on railroads, including separate railway cars, though it specified that the accommodations must be kept "equal".  Concerned, several African Americans (including Louisiana's former governer PBS Pinchback) and Whites in New Orleans formed an association, the Citizens' Committee to Test the Separate Car Act, dedicated to the repeal of that law. They raised $1412.70 ($33711.21 in 2008 USD) which they offered to the then-famous author and Radical Republican jurist, Albion W. Tourgée, to serve as lead counsel for their test case.  Tourgée agreed to do it for free. Later, they enlisted Homer Plessy, who was one-eighth black, to take part in an act of planned civil disobedience. The plan was for Plessy to be thrown off the railway car and arrestedbut for violating the Separate Car Act, which could and did lead to a challenge with the high court. The Committee hired a detective to ensure that Plessy was arrested for violating the Separate Car Act, which the Citizen's Committee wanted to challenge with the goal of having it overturned. They chose Plessy because, with his light skin color, he could buy a first class train ticket and, at the same time, be arrested when he announced, while sitting on board the train, that he had an African-American ancestor. For the Committee, this was a deliberate attempt to exploit the lack of clear racial definition in either science or law so as to argue that segregation by race was an "unreasonable" use of state power. The intellectual roots of Plessy v. Ferguson were in part tied to the scientific racism of the era. However, the popular support for the decision was more likely a result of the racist beliefs held by most whites at the time.[3
Plessy V. Ferguson (Continued) Thirteenth Amendment Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Fourteenth Amendment Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the Plessy boarded a car of the East Louisiana Railroad that was designated for use by white patrons only.  He was able to purchase a ticket in first class because his light skin color, but was later asked to leave the car. Plessy refused to leave and was arrested. He sued the state of LA for infringing on his rights of the 13th and 14th Amendments.  privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Plessy vs. Ferguson (cont’d) However, the judge presiding over his case, John Ferguson, ruled that Louisiana had the right to regulate railroad companies as long as they operated within state boundaries.  The Committee of Citizens took Plessy's appeal to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, which ruled with the state AGAIN.  The committee appealed to the United States Supreme Court in 1896. The Supreme Court sided with LA and RACIAL SEGREGATION WAS WRITTEN INTO US LAW.
Brown vs. Board of Education 1951 For next 90 years,  “separate but equal “doctrine ruled the land.  In 1951, a class action suit was filed against the Board of Education of the City of Topeka, Kansas in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. The plaintiffs were thirteen Topeka parents on behalf of their twenty children.
Brown vs. Board of Education The suit called for the school district to reverse its policy of racial segregation. Separate elementary schools were operated by the Topeka Board of Education under an 1879 Kansas law, which permitted (but did not require) districts to maintain separate elementary school facilities for black and white students in twelve communities with populations over 15,000. The plaintiffs had been recruited by the leadership of the Topeka NAACP.  The named plaintiff, Oliver Brown, was a parent of Linda, a third grader, had to walk six blocks to her school bus stop to ride to Monroe Elementary, her segregated black school, which was  one mile (1.6 km) away, while Sumner Elementary, a white school, was seven blocks from her house.
Brown vs. Board of Education As directed by the NAACP leadership, the parents each attempted to enroll their children in the closest neighborhood school in the fall of 1951. They were each refused enrollment and directed to the segregated schools. Linda Brown Thompson later recalled the experience in a 2004 PBS documentary: The District Court ruled in favor of the Board of Education, citing the Plessy vs. Ferguson, (1896), which had upheld a state law requiring "separate but equal" segregated facilities for blacks and whites in railway cars The three-judge District Court panel found that segregation in public education has a detrimental effect upon negro children, but denied relief on the ground that the negro and white schools in Topeka were substantially equal with respect to buildings, transportation, curricular, and educational qualifications of teachers. The NAACP took the case to Supreme Court.
Brown vs. Board of Education Handed down on May 17, 1954, the Court's unanimous (9-0) decision stated that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal." As a result, de jure racial segregation  was ruled a violation of the Equal Rights Amendment of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Little Rock Nine
Little Rock NineLittle Rock Nine
Little Rock Ninenstechfun
 
Plessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs fergusonPlessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs fergusonKeri Hays
 
Plessy v. Ferguson
Plessy v. FergusonPlessy v. Ferguson
Plessy v. Fergusonmradrian777
 
Introduction to the Bill of Rights
Introduction to the Bill of RightsIntroduction to the Bill of Rights
Introduction to the Bill of RightsLina Nandy
 
the history of the civil right movement in America .
the history of the civil right movement in America .the history of the civil right movement in America .
the history of the civil right movement in America .Fatine Boulaid
 
Reconstruction (1865-1877)
Reconstruction (1865-1877)Reconstruction (1865-1877)
Reconstruction (1865-1877)kbeacom
 
Jim Crow PowerPoint
Jim Crow PowerPointJim Crow PowerPoint
Jim Crow PowerPointjar142
 
The Civil Rights Movement Timeline
The Civil Rights Movement TimelineThe Civil Rights Movement Timeline
The Civil Rights Movement Timelinesmliddll
 
7.2 reconstruction and its effects 1865 1877
7.2 reconstruction and its effects 1865 18777.2 reconstruction and its effects 1865 1877
7.2 reconstruction and its effects 1865 1877jtoma84
 
The freedom riders
The freedom ridersThe freedom riders
The freedom riderscantin3
 
The Civil War (US History)
The Civil War (US History)The Civil War (US History)
The Civil War (US History)Tom Richey
 
Ppt 10 jim crow laws
Ppt 10 jim crow lawsPpt 10 jim crow laws
Ppt 10 jim crow lawsDB3igs
 

Mais procurados (20)

The black codes
The black codesThe black codes
The black codes
 
Little Rock Nine
Little Rock NineLittle Rock Nine
Little Rock Nine
 
Plessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs fergusonPlessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs ferguson
 
Abolition Movement
Abolition MovementAbolition Movement
Abolition Movement
 
Plessy v. Ferguson
Plessy v. FergusonPlessy v. Ferguson
Plessy v. Ferguson
 
Segregation
SegregationSegregation
Segregation
 
Muckrakers
MuckrakersMuckrakers
Muckrakers
 
Civil Rights Movement
Civil Rights MovementCivil Rights Movement
Civil Rights Movement
 
The presidency
The presidencyThe presidency
The presidency
 
Introduction to the Bill of Rights
Introduction to the Bill of RightsIntroduction to the Bill of Rights
Introduction to the Bill of Rights
 
Civil Liberties
Civil LibertiesCivil Liberties
Civil Liberties
 
the history of the civil right movement in America .
the history of the civil right movement in America .the history of the civil right movement in America .
the history of the civil right movement in America .
 
Reconstruction (1865-1877)
Reconstruction (1865-1877)Reconstruction (1865-1877)
Reconstruction (1865-1877)
 
Jim Crow PowerPoint
Jim Crow PowerPointJim Crow PowerPoint
Jim Crow PowerPoint
 
The Civil Rights Movement Timeline
The Civil Rights Movement TimelineThe Civil Rights Movement Timeline
The Civil Rights Movement Timeline
 
Civil Rights Movement
Civil Rights MovementCivil Rights Movement
Civil Rights Movement
 
7.2 reconstruction and its effects 1865 1877
7.2 reconstruction and its effects 1865 18777.2 reconstruction and its effects 1865 1877
7.2 reconstruction and its effects 1865 1877
 
The freedom riders
The freedom ridersThe freedom riders
The freedom riders
 
The Civil War (US History)
The Civil War (US History)The Civil War (US History)
The Civil War (US History)
 
Ppt 10 jim crow laws
Ppt 10 jim crow lawsPpt 10 jim crow laws
Ppt 10 jim crow laws
 

Destaque

Brown vs board presentation 032812
Brown vs board presentation 032812Brown vs board presentation 032812
Brown vs board presentation 032812shuggins1
 
Plessy v ferguson presentation
Plessy v ferguson presentationPlessy v ferguson presentation
Plessy v ferguson presentationPreshaylaJames
 
Mona Pexa In Re Gault
Mona Pexa In Re GaultMona Pexa In Re Gault
Mona Pexa In Re Gaultmarcus hurt
 
United states v. nixon
United states  v. nixonUnited states  v. nixon
United states v. nixonxsportz28
 
Roe v. Wade
Roe v. WadeRoe v. Wade
Roe v. Wademrgeib
 
BoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3s
BoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3sBoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3s
BoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3sBoyarMiller
 
Landmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesLandmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesPiers Midwinter
 
Supreme court Landmark Cases
Supreme court Landmark CasesSupreme court Landmark Cases
Supreme court Landmark CasesRCSDIT
 
Racial Segregation
Racial SegregationRacial Segregation
Racial Segregationallie9
 
Segregation 20 powerpoint
Segregation 20 powerpointSegregation 20 powerpoint
Segregation 20 powerpointmradrian777
 
District of columbia v. Heller
District of columbia v. HellerDistrict of columbia v. Heller
District of columbia v. HellerZachariah Bernard
 
McDonald vs chicago
McDonald vs chicagoMcDonald vs chicago
McDonald vs chicagomariecalie
 

Destaque (14)

Roe V Wade Finished Ppt
Roe V Wade Finished PptRoe V Wade Finished Ppt
Roe V Wade Finished Ppt
 
Brown vs board presentation 032812
Brown vs board presentation 032812Brown vs board presentation 032812
Brown vs board presentation 032812
 
Plessy v ferguson presentation
Plessy v ferguson presentationPlessy v ferguson presentation
Plessy v ferguson presentation
 
Mona Pexa In Re Gault
Mona Pexa In Re GaultMona Pexa In Re Gault
Mona Pexa In Re Gault
 
United states v. nixon
United states  v. nixonUnited states  v. nixon
United states v. nixon
 
Roe v. Wade
Roe v. WadeRoe v. Wade
Roe v. Wade
 
BoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3s
BoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3sBoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3s
BoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3s
 
Landmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesLandmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court cases
 
Supreme court Landmark Cases
Supreme court Landmark CasesSupreme court Landmark Cases
Supreme court Landmark Cases
 
Grutter v bollinger
Grutter v bollingerGrutter v bollinger
Grutter v bollinger
 
Racial Segregation
Racial SegregationRacial Segregation
Racial Segregation
 
Segregation 20 powerpoint
Segregation 20 powerpointSegregation 20 powerpoint
Segregation 20 powerpoint
 
District of columbia v. Heller
District of columbia v. HellerDistrict of columbia v. Heller
District of columbia v. Heller
 
McDonald vs chicago
McDonald vs chicagoMcDonald vs chicago
McDonald vs chicago
 

Semelhante a Brown ends "separate but equal

The Courts And The Pursuit Of School Integration
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School IntegrationThe Courts And The Pursuit Of School Integration
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School IntegrationJacobsBr412
 
Group 3 power point
Group 3 power pointGroup 3 power point
Group 3 power pointJacobsBr412
 
Brown v. board of education
Brown v. board of educationBrown v. board of education
Brown v. board of educationhoppa1177
 
Conflicts Of Segregation 2
Conflicts Of Segregation 2Conflicts Of Segregation 2
Conflicts Of Segregation 2stoklosa
 
Dbq Plessy V. Ferguson
Dbq Plessy V. FergusonDbq Plessy V. Ferguson
Dbq Plessy V. FergusonLisa Fields
 
4th Amendment...
4th Amendment...4th Amendment...
4th Amendment...Dana Leon
 
4th Amendment
4th Amendment4th Amendment
4th AmendmentDana Leon
 
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti MisraPlessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti MisraSHRUTIMISRA7
 
African american education 19th cent
African american education   19th centAfrican american education   19th cent
African american education 19th centMELINDA TOMPKINS
 
Important Supreme Court Cases
Important Supreme Court CasesImportant Supreme Court Cases
Important Supreme Court CasesCory Plough
 

Semelhante a Brown ends "separate but equal (14)

Plessy V Ferguson Essay
Plessy V Ferguson EssayPlessy V Ferguson Essay
Plessy V Ferguson Essay
 
Ferguson Vs Plessy
Ferguson Vs PlessyFerguson Vs Plessy
Ferguson Vs Plessy
 
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School Integration
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School IntegrationThe Courts And The Pursuit Of School Integration
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School Integration
 
Group 3 power point
Group 3 power pointGroup 3 power point
Group 3 power point
 
Brown v. board of education
Brown v. board of educationBrown v. board of education
Brown v. board of education
 
Conflicts Of Segregation 2
Conflicts Of Segregation 2Conflicts Of Segregation 2
Conflicts Of Segregation 2
 
Dbq Plessy V. Ferguson
Dbq Plessy V. FergusonDbq Plessy V. Ferguson
Dbq Plessy V. Ferguson
 
Brown vs. boardmycom
Brown vs. boardmycomBrown vs. boardmycom
Brown vs. boardmycom
 
4th Amendment...
4th Amendment...4th Amendment...
4th Amendment...
 
4th Amendment
4th Amendment4th Amendment
4th Amendment
 
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti MisraPlessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
 
African american education 19th cent
African american education   19th centAfrican american education   19th cent
African american education 19th cent
 
Important Supreme Court Cases
Important Supreme Court CasesImportant Supreme Court Cases
Important Supreme Court Cases
 
Civil rights 2
Civil rights 2Civil rights 2
Civil rights 2
 

Último

Narcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdf
Narcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdfNarcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdf
Narcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdfPrerana Jadhav
 
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemConcurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemChristalin Nelson
 
DIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptx
DIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptxDIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptx
DIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptxMichelleTuguinay1
 
Blowin' in the Wind of Caste_ Bob Dylan's Song as a Catalyst for Social Justi...
Blowin' in the Wind of Caste_ Bob Dylan's Song as a Catalyst for Social Justi...Blowin' in the Wind of Caste_ Bob Dylan's Song as a Catalyst for Social Justi...
Blowin' in the Wind of Caste_ Bob Dylan's Song as a Catalyst for Social Justi...DhatriParmar
 
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxINTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxHumphrey A Beña
 
MS4 level being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
MS4 level   being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdfMS4 level   being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
MS4 level being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdfMr Bounab Samir
 
4.11.24 Mass Incarceration and the New Jim Crow.pptx
4.11.24 Mass Incarceration and the New Jim Crow.pptx4.11.24 Mass Incarceration and the New Jim Crow.pptx
4.11.24 Mass Incarceration and the New Jim Crow.pptxmary850239
 
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQ-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQuiz Club NITW
 
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptxMan or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptxDhatriParmar
 
Oppenheimer Film Discussion for Philosophy and Film
Oppenheimer Film Discussion for Philosophy and FilmOppenheimer Film Discussion for Philosophy and Film
Oppenheimer Film Discussion for Philosophy and FilmStan Meyer
 
How to Make a Duplicate of Your Odoo 17 Database
How to Make a Duplicate of Your Odoo 17 DatabaseHow to Make a Duplicate of Your Odoo 17 Database
How to Make a Duplicate of Your Odoo 17 DatabaseCeline George
 
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptxmary850239
 
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQ-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQuiz Club NITW
 
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...Seán Kennedy
 
Transaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemTransaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemChristalin Nelson
 
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentationCongestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentationdeepaannamalai16
 
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptxBIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptxSayali Powar
 

Último (20)

Narcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdf
Narcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdfNarcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdf
Narcotic and Non Narcotic Analgesic..pdf
 
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemConcurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
 
DIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptx
DIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptxDIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptx
DIFFERENT BASKETRY IN THE PHILIPPINES PPT.pptx
 
Blowin' in the Wind of Caste_ Bob Dylan's Song as a Catalyst for Social Justi...
Blowin' in the Wind of Caste_ Bob Dylan's Song as a Catalyst for Social Justi...Blowin' in the Wind of Caste_ Bob Dylan's Song as a Catalyst for Social Justi...
Blowin' in the Wind of Caste_ Bob Dylan's Song as a Catalyst for Social Justi...
 
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxINTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
 
MS4 level being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
MS4 level   being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdfMS4 level   being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
MS4 level being good citizen -imperative- (1) (1).pdf
 
4.11.24 Mass Incarceration and the New Jim Crow.pptx
4.11.24 Mass Incarceration and the New Jim Crow.pptx4.11.24 Mass Incarceration and the New Jim Crow.pptx
4.11.24 Mass Incarceration and the New Jim Crow.pptx
 
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQ-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor General Quiz-7th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
 
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptxMan or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
Man or Manufactured_ Redefining Humanity Through Biopunk Narratives.pptx
 
prashanth updated resume 2024 for Teaching Profession
prashanth updated resume 2024 for Teaching Professionprashanth updated resume 2024 for Teaching Profession
prashanth updated resume 2024 for Teaching Profession
 
Oppenheimer Film Discussion for Philosophy and Film
Oppenheimer Film Discussion for Philosophy and FilmOppenheimer Film Discussion for Philosophy and Film
Oppenheimer Film Discussion for Philosophy and Film
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Large Language Models"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Large Language Models"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Large Language Models"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Large Language Models"
 
How to Make a Duplicate of Your Odoo 17 Database
How to Make a Duplicate of Your Odoo 17 DatabaseHow to Make a Duplicate of Your Odoo 17 Database
How to Make a Duplicate of Your Odoo 17 Database
 
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
 
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQ-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
Q-Factor HISPOL Quiz-6th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
 
INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptx
INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptxINCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptx
INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES FOR TEACHERS AND TRAINERS.pptx
 
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
 
Transaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemTransaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management System
 
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentationCongestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
Congestive Cardiac Failure..presentation
 
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptxBIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
BIOCHEMISTRY-CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM CHAPTER 2.pptx
 

Brown ends "separate but equal

  • 1. Brown vs. board of education 1954 US Supreme Court case Lucy Eccleston Norvall
  • 2. Background: Plessy v. Ferguson After the end of the American Civil War in 1865, during the period known as Reconstruction, the government was able to provide some protection for the civil rights of the newly-freed slaves. Reconstruction abruptly ended with the Compromise of 1877 and federal troops were withdrawn, southern state governments began passing Jim Crow Laws that prohibited blacks from using the same public accommodations as whites.
  • 3. Plessy v. Ferguson (Continued) Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the docterine of “separate but equal“ "Separate but equal" remained standard doctrine in U.S. law until Brown Vs. Board of Education.
  • 4. Plessy vs. Ferguson In 1890, the State of Louisiana passed Act 111 that required separate accommodations for African Americans and Whites on railroads, including separate railway cars, though it specified that the accommodations must be kept "equal". Concerned, several African Americans (including Louisiana's former governer PBS Pinchback) and Whites in New Orleans formed an association, the Citizens' Committee to Test the Separate Car Act, dedicated to the repeal of that law. They raised $1412.70 ($33711.21 in 2008 USD) which they offered to the then-famous author and Radical Republican jurist, Albion W. Tourgée, to serve as lead counsel for their test case. Tourgée agreed to do it for free. Later, they enlisted Homer Plessy, who was one-eighth black, to take part in an act of planned civil disobedience. The plan was for Plessy to be thrown off the railway car and arrestedbut for violating the Separate Car Act, which could and did lead to a challenge with the high court. The Committee hired a detective to ensure that Plessy was arrested for violating the Separate Car Act, which the Citizen's Committee wanted to challenge with the goal of having it overturned. They chose Plessy because, with his light skin color, he could buy a first class train ticket and, at the same time, be arrested when he announced, while sitting on board the train, that he had an African-American ancestor. For the Committee, this was a deliberate attempt to exploit the lack of clear racial definition in either science or law so as to argue that segregation by race was an "unreasonable" use of state power. The intellectual roots of Plessy v. Ferguson were in part tied to the scientific racism of the era. However, the popular support for the decision was more likely a result of the racist beliefs held by most whites at the time.[3
  • 5. Plessy V. Ferguson (Continued) Thirteenth Amendment Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Fourteenth Amendment Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the Plessy boarded a car of the East Louisiana Railroad that was designated for use by white patrons only. He was able to purchase a ticket in first class because his light skin color, but was later asked to leave the car. Plessy refused to leave and was arrested. He sued the state of LA for infringing on his rights of the 13th and 14th Amendments. privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
  • 6. Plessy vs. Ferguson (cont’d) However, the judge presiding over his case, John Ferguson, ruled that Louisiana had the right to regulate railroad companies as long as they operated within state boundaries. The Committee of Citizens took Plessy's appeal to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, which ruled with the state AGAIN. The committee appealed to the United States Supreme Court in 1896. The Supreme Court sided with LA and RACIAL SEGREGATION WAS WRITTEN INTO US LAW.
  • 7. Brown vs. Board of Education 1951 For next 90 years, “separate but equal “doctrine ruled the land. In 1951, a class action suit was filed against the Board of Education of the City of Topeka, Kansas in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. The plaintiffs were thirteen Topeka parents on behalf of their twenty children.
  • 8. Brown vs. Board of Education The suit called for the school district to reverse its policy of racial segregation. Separate elementary schools were operated by the Topeka Board of Education under an 1879 Kansas law, which permitted (but did not require) districts to maintain separate elementary school facilities for black and white students in twelve communities with populations over 15,000. The plaintiffs had been recruited by the leadership of the Topeka NAACP. The named plaintiff, Oliver Brown, was a parent of Linda, a third grader, had to walk six blocks to her school bus stop to ride to Monroe Elementary, her segregated black school, which was one mile (1.6 km) away, while Sumner Elementary, a white school, was seven blocks from her house.
  • 9. Brown vs. Board of Education As directed by the NAACP leadership, the parents each attempted to enroll their children in the closest neighborhood school in the fall of 1951. They were each refused enrollment and directed to the segregated schools. Linda Brown Thompson later recalled the experience in a 2004 PBS documentary: The District Court ruled in favor of the Board of Education, citing the Plessy vs. Ferguson, (1896), which had upheld a state law requiring "separate but equal" segregated facilities for blacks and whites in railway cars The three-judge District Court panel found that segregation in public education has a detrimental effect upon negro children, but denied relief on the ground that the negro and white schools in Topeka were substantially equal with respect to buildings, transportation, curricular, and educational qualifications of teachers. The NAACP took the case to Supreme Court.
  • 10. Brown vs. Board of Education Handed down on May 17, 1954, the Court's unanimous (9-0) decision stated that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal." As a result, de jure racial segregation was ruled a violation of the Equal Rights Amendment of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.