1. CRITIQUE
When everyone of us write an essay, each time he opens his essay he starts to criticize his own essay
and correct it to become more accepted from his point of view .
In my essay, the introduction was somehow full of mystery as it has some terms that is unknown to
some of us. When a reader finds something like Character Ethic and personality Ethic he might not
understand it so a small hint about their definition should be there to lighten the reader. Also, the
introduction was not good enough as it was more concerned about the literature in that era
more than the book. I think it would have been better if the introduction was more concerned on
the importance of the book and its effect on people.
I think that the brief paragraphs written about the seven habits were good enough to give the
readers a hint about each habit but still there are some defects. In the first habit, “Circle of
Influence, Circle of Concern “was mentioned without their definitions’ so the reader might not
understand it so there definitions should be mentioned. In habit no2, what’s the principle that
everything is created twice??!! The paragraph is long and there was no need for the alternatives
to be mentioned. In habit number three, the 4 quadrants were mentioned generally which might
cause an exclamation mark for the readers so at least the writer should have mentioned what’s
each quadrant is and what goes beneath it. In habit no four it was too much brief. It was better if
the writer focused more on the definition of win/win which is the optimum solution. Also a small
note about each paradigm would be useful for the reader. Also 3 more mysterious definitions
were mentioned at the end of habit no5... So either the writer shouldn’t mention it or give their
definitions. In habit no six an important topic was missing to be mentioned which is the effect of
synergy on communication.
Finally, it would be better in the conclusion the effect of that book on people life and what would
it differ in the person’s life if he reads such book.