Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Destaque
Destaque (19)
Mais de Mathias Klang
Mais de Mathias Klang (20)
Kropp & Ägande
- 1. Kroppar& ägande Mathias Klang
- 2. Locke 1690 “...every man has a Property in his own Person. This no Body has any Right to but himself. The Labour of his Body, and the Work of his Hands, we may say, are properly his”
- 3. Men äger vi vårakropparochkroppsdelar
- 5. 3 §Biologiskt material avsettför transplantation ellerannatmedicinsktändamålfårtasfrån en avlidenmänniskaomdenneharmedgettdetellerdetpåannatsättkanutredasattåtgärdenskulleståiöverensstämmelse med den avlidnesinställning. I annat fall änsomavsesiförsta stycketfårbiologiskt material tas, ominte den avlidneharskriftligenmotsatt sig ettsådantingreppelleruttalat sig mot detellerdetavannatskälfinnsanledningatt anta attingreppetskullestrida mot den avlidnesinställning.
- 6. Historik
- 8. Andreas Vesalius (1514 - 1564) anatominsgrundareskrev De humanicorporisfabrica (On the Workings of the Human Body). Hölloftaobduktioner live.
- 9. Leonardo da Vinci Hade tillståndattdissikeraillustreradeTreatise on painting (1680) med fleraexempel
- 12. Fram till ca 1750 fick Royal College of Physicians and Company of Barber-Surgeons delapå 10 lik per år Ävenefter Murder Act 1752 näravrättademördarefickdissekerasvartillgångneförliten.
- 13. Resurrection Men
- 14. Haynes, 1614, 12 Co. Rep 112 Haynes stalfrånlik.domstolenfannattlikharingenegenom.Misstolkasattbli: corpses cannot own property, but they cannot be property
- 16. R vCundick George Cundickanlitadesförattbegrava Edward Lee. Närfamiljenkompåbesökhävdadehanattkroppenvarredanbegravd – men hanupptäcktesnärhanförsöktesäljakroppen till en anatomist.
- 17. Burke & Hare
- 18. ModernaStölder In Cyprus, the former President TassosPapadopoulos's body was stolen from his grave on 11 December 2009. Chaplin was interred in Corsier-Sur-Vevey Cemetery, Vaud, Switzerland. On 1 March 1978, his corpse was stolen in an attempt to extort money from his family.
- 20. Dobson vs North TynesideHealth Authority
- 21. R v. Gibson
- 22. R v Kelly & Lindsay
- 23. Mjälten
- 26. Bismark Otto von Bismarck dör 1898 Tvåfotografer tar sig in utanlov Fotolag Tyskfotolag 1876 reproduktionsrättfotografen Undantagförporträttreprorättbeställaren Men
- 27. Bodyworlds
- 28. begravning
- 29. Andra slut
- 31. Änkan till James Booth lätblandahansaska med krutochfylldeblandningenipatronersomanvändes till säsongenssistajakt. Resultatetvar 70 rapphöna, 23 fasanoch 7 änder
- 32. Celestis
Notas do Editor
- black angelfrom sy parrish
- Claustrofobia / Claustrophobia from * CatiKaoe * cc by ncsa.jpg
- Oops! by mksavage cc by ncsa
- Peanut Butter Cup Heart from Bob.Fornal cc by ncsa
- Boring is Beautiful from Bright Tal cc by ncsa
- The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp, (1632) by Rembrandt, depicts an autopsy.
- While studying in Paris, Vesalius was accustomed to robbing the Paris graveyards with fellow anatomy pupils. Body snatchers in France were called "Les Corbeaux" (the crows). Violation of graves could result in a year's imprisonment plus a stiff fine.In specially built anatomy theatres (the precursors of today's operating theatres), Vesalius played to packed crowds. Like Galen, he had favourite dramatic routines: his was to plunge his hand into the body, pull out the heart and display it to onlookers.
- Lymfkärlenochlymfsystemet
- Time halted by paulwb cc by ncsa
- Bloody Drip by Marshed cc by ncsa
- Before the Anatomy Act of 1832, the only legal supply of corpses for anatomical purposes in the UK were those condemned to death and dissection by the courts. Those who were sentenced to dissection by the courts were often guilty of comparatively harsher crimes. Such sentences did not provide enough subjects for the medical schools and private anatomical schools (which did not require a licence before 1832). While during the 18th century hundreds had been executed for trivial crimes, by the 19th century only about 55 people were being sentenced to capital punishment each year. However, with the expansion of the medical schools, as many as 500 cadavers were neededMary Magdalenfrom starfish235
- Leicester in 1614complaint was made against one William Haynes that hehad digged up the several graves of three men and one woman, inthe night, and had taken their winding sheets from their bodies.In short, that he had stolen property belonging to thedeceased. The Justices at Serjeants Inn, Fleet Street (a sort of17C Court of Appeal), resolved that the property of thesheets remain in the owners, that is, in him who had propertytherein, when the dead body was wrapped therewith; for the deadbody is not capable of it…a dead body being but a lump of earthhath no capacity.Photo: Pressed into Service from horizontal.integration cc by ncsa
- (1822) Dowl. & Ry N.P. 13
- Burke & Hare morden 17 människormördadesmellan 1827 - 1828 Early Watchfrom oldbilluk
- Doodewardvisadeuppkroppenpå en tvåhuvad barnPolisenansåg indecent och tog detfrånhonomHan försöktefåtillbaka sin egendomIt was argued that, since there was no property in a corpse, the plaintiff could not have a right to possession, and therefore his action must fail. By a majority of two to one, the Court held that Doodeward was indeed entitled to the return of his grisly exhibit. Why? Because the corpse of the unfortunate child had been subject to the lawful exercise of work or skill so…that it has acquired some attributes differentiating it from a mere corpse awaiting burial. In short, because skill and application had been applied, it ceased to be a legal nothing and became a something worthy of the law’s protection.(1908, 6 CLR 406)Siamese twins from robert.molinarius cc by ncsa
- The Court held that the next-of-kin had no right to possession of, or property in, the deceased’s brain, since the act of preserving the brain was not an application of human skill upon it such as to render it property within the law. As it was not property, the family could not own it, and therefore could not claim damages for its destruction.KvinnadöravtumörSjukhus tar uthjärnaochbevarardetAnhörigastämmersjukhusförbristandevårdochkräveratthjärnansombevis. Hjärnanärnumeraförstördochanhörigastämmerfördetta. (1996, 4 All. ER 474)
- In 1989, Gibson acquired two human fetuses from an anatomy professor.[1] They were in a period of 3–4 weeks of gestation, and freeze dried.[1][4] The fetuses were attached as earrings to a female head[5] modeled by Gibson, with the title Human earrings.[6] They were displayed at the Young Unknowns Gallery[4] and the London gallery owner was fined[7] several hundred dollars.[6] Gibson was prosecuted and found guilty under the common law offense of outraging public decency and fined[1][7] £500[8] by an Old Bailey jury.[4]R v. Gibson[1991] 1All ER 439. Richard Norman Gibson was an artist. He created awork entitled ‘Human Earrings’, consisting of a model’s head adorned witha pair of earrings. Each earring was made out of a freeze-dried humanfoetus of three or four months’ gestation, with a ring fitting tapped into itsskull and attached at the other end to the model’s earlobe.... Mueh? from ecatoncheires cc by ncsa
- 1999, Q.B. 621Konstnärfårtillgång till kroppsdelarförattskissadom – de skaingåiträningsmaterialförkirurger. Tar med sig materialet hem. Görgipskopioravdomochställerut dom. Prepararsi.. from Alessandro Pinna cc by ncsa .jpg
- Moore v. Regents of the University of California (51 Cal. 3d 120; 271 Cal. Rptr. 146; 793 P.2d 479) was a landmark Supreme Court of California decision filed on July 9, 1990 which dealt with the issue of property rights in one's own body parts. John Moore underwent treatment for hairy cell leukemia at the UCLA Medical Center under the supervision of Dr. David W. Golde. Moore's cancer was later developed into a cell line that was commercialized. The California Supreme Court ruled that Moore had no right to any share of the profits realized from the commercialization of anything developed from his discarded body parts.
- Death of a surrealist soldierfrom funadiumcc by ncsa
- Heroes from videoplacebo is not cc by ncsa
- The 1876 law vested the exclusive right to make copies of a photograph by the person who manufactures it. However the law also provided that in the case of a portrait photograph, the commissioner of that photograph has a right over its reproduction or copyright. "The commissioner was thus regarded as the author of the portrait in the legal sense," Caplan said, "and the photographer was legally presented as merely the agency by which his will was accomplished. Thus in German law, reproducing a portrait photograph without the permission of the person who had commissioned it was illegal."
- Van Hagen
- Charleston from wonderbjerg cc by ncsa.jpg
- As requested in his will, Bentham's body was dissected as part of a public anatomy lecture. Afterward, the skeleton and head were preserved and stored in a wooden cabinet called the "Auto-icon", with the skeleton stuffed out with hay and dressed in Bentham's clothes. Originally kept by his disciple Thomas Southwood Smith,[12] it was acquired by University College London in 1850. It is normally kept on public display at the end of the South Cloisters in the main building of the college, but for the 100th and 150th anniversaries of the college, it was brought to the meeting of the College Council, where it was listed as "present but not voting".[13]The Auto-icon has a wax head, as Bentham's head was badly damaged in the preservation process. The real head was displayed in the same case for many years, but became the target of repeated student pranks, including being stolen on more than one occasion. It is now locked away securely.[14]
- El cádaver de David Morales Colón, de 22 años, está expuesto en unamotoradeportivaHonda Repsol en la funerariaMarín, en Hato Rey.martes, 27 de abril de 2010http://www.primerahora.com/diario/noticia/otras/noticias/velan_muerto_en_motora_en_hato_rey_%28ve_video%29/383502