Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Mapping Opportunity for Advocacy and Social Justice
1. Mapping Opportunity
for Advocacy and Social Justice
CRP 608- Winter Quarter, 2011
January 18, 2011
Jason Reece
Senior Research Associate
reece.35@osu.edu
Matthew Martin
Research Associate
martin.1227@osu.edu
Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity
The Ohio State University
2. • Use of mapping in our work
• Opportunity mapping:
• Assumptions
• Methodology
• Examples
• Applications and Impact
Overview
2
3. Racial and social inequities are often manifested
spatially
Local issues tend to have a regional scope and
variation e.g. school performance, housing
vacancy
◦ Maps are naturally the best tools to display this spatial
phenomena
◦ Maps give us the opportunity to look at our entire regions or
states
Informing people about an issue at a scale they may not usually
think of
linking communities sharing similar problems
Space and Social Equity
3
4. Columbus Neighborhoods: 2006 Foreclosures
Maps are incredibly
efficient
compacting volumes of
data
ability to convey
information in seconds
tell a story or solve a
problem
Provide spatial reference
Shared sense of value
Builds mutual trust
Why use maps?
4
5. Emphasis on how systems work to produce inequity
◦ How do multiple issues interact to either depress or uplift certain
populations or communities?
◦ What can we do to “strategically intervene” and improve
outcomes for marginalized communities
Extensive use of GIS/mapping in our work
◦ Inequity has a geographic footprint
◦ Leverage points sometimes geographic in scope
◦ Maps powerful for tools for
Research
Designing policy/programming
Communicating research/issues to the public and other
stakeholders
About Our Work
5
6. In
our work we see mapping as
serving these primary advocacy goals
◦ Analysis
Existing conditions, spatial trends, scenarios,
optimization etc.
◦ Storytelling
A narrative
◦ Legal Evidence
Liability, disparate impact
Remedy
Using Maps for Advocacy
6
7. Are hospital investments benefiting
communities of color? (Columbus)
Are job growth areas connected to transit?
(Baltimore)
Is the distribution of subsidized housing
units affirmatively furthering fair housing?
(Baltimore)
Analytical Examples
7
8. Franklin County, OH Health Investment
Disparity
Hospital
Investments
and African
American
neighborhoods
Columbus
Health Equity
Research
8
9. Recent Job Growth 98-02 and Public Transit
in the Baltimore Region
Job Growth & Public
Transit in Baltimore
Percent Change
in Jobs
Job Loss
0- 5
5 - 15
Spatial
Mismatch
15 - 30
9
30 - 66.6
10. Foreclosures in African American
neighborhoods are due to subprime lending
patterns (Cleveland)
What if Montclair, NJ schools returned to
neighborhood school system?
Were Stimulus investments made in
communities that were most impacted by the
recession (Florida)?
Affordable housing is scarce in areas with
access to quality education and employment
opportunities.
How have historic redlining practices affected
today’s opportunity landscape (Portland)?
Narratives Examples
10
11. Cleveland MSA Subprime Loans: 2005
Maps: Produced and adapted from Charles Bromley, SAGES Presidential Fellow, Case Western
University
Race and Subprime Lending
11
12. Cleveland MSA
Foreclosures: 2006
Maps: Produced and adapted from
Charles Bromley, SAGES Presidential
Fellow, Case Western University
Race and Foreclosure
15. Historic Redlining
Practices and
Access to
Opportunity in
2010
Redlining & Opportunity
16. Research tool to
◦ understand the dynamics of “opportunity” within
metropolitan areas
◦ illustrate where opportunity rich communities exist
(and assess who has access to these communities)
◦ understand what needs to be remedied in opportunity
poor communities
Based on Kirwan Institute’s “Communities of
Opportunity” framework
Opportunity Mapping:
Combining Analysis with a Strong Narrative
16
17. Everyone should have fair access to the
critical opportunity structures needed to
succeed in life.
Low Opportunity neighborhoods limit the
development of human capital.
A Community of Opportunity approach can
develop pathways that result in increased
social and economic health, benefiting
everyone.
The Communities of Opportunity Approach
17
19. “Opportunity” is a situation or condition that places individuals
in a position to be more likely to succeed or excel.
Opportunity structures are critical to opening pathways to
success:
◦ High-quality education
◦ Healthy and safe environment
◦ Stable housing
◦ Sustainable employment
◦ Political empowerment
◦ Outlets for wealth-building
◦ Positive social networks
Opportunity Matters:
Space, Place, and Life Outcomes
19
22. Some people ride the “Up” Others have to run up the
escalator to reach “Down” escalator to get
opportunity. there. 22
23. The Communities of Opportunity framework is inherently
spatial
◦ Inequality has a geographic footprint
◦ Maps can visually track the history and presence of discriminatory and
exclusionary policies that spatially segregate people
◦ Identifying places with gaps in opportunity can help direct future
investment and identify structures which impede access to opportunity
The model uses state-of-the-art GIS and extensive data
sets to analyze the distribution of opportunity in our
metro regions
Mapping Opportunity:
Why and How
23
24. Opportunity Mapping Model
A refined model to depict spatial pattern of
opportunity
◦ Identifying indicators as proxy for opportunity
◦ Supported by social science literature
◦ Data easily available
◦ Index based approach compresses multi-factors to an index
Model is a good communications tool to work
with communities
24
26. How do you map opportunity?
◦ Data representing community conditions is gathered for
neighborhood (census tracts) across the state or region
Aggregated to the Census Tract level
Analyzed to create a comprehensive opportunity index for the region
◦ The opportunity index is then mapped and census tracts are broken
into quintiles based on their opportunity score
Very Low, Low, Moderate, High, Very High
Mapping Communities of Opportunity:
Methods and Indicators
26
34. Building A Fair Florida
A Study of Opportunity and Recovery
Pre-Conference Workshop
March 11, 2010
35. What does Florida’s opportunity landscape look
like?
What communities in Florida have been impacted
the most by the recession?
What’s happening with the resources from The
Recovery Act (ARRA)?
Are jobs being created in Florida’s hard-hit
communities?
What’s being done about the housing crisis?
Recession and Recovery
36. Phase 1: A call for transparency, tracking,
and accountability (September 2009)
Phase 2: Analysis of the opportunity
landscape and the effects of the recession
(October 2009)
Phase 3: A study of ARRA contract
procurement and job creation (January 2010)
Phase 4: Reviewing the neighborhood
stabilization program and the Federal
response to the housing crisis (May 2010)
Build A Fair Florida
37. A study of the opportunity status of
key regions in Florida
◦ Miami
◦ Tampa
◦ Orlando
◦ Jacksonville
Preparatory analysis for ARRA
resource allocation research and
advocacy efforts
◦ What places and have the greatest
need for investment?
◦ What people and have the greatest
need for investment?
◦ What elements of success need the
most investment?
Education, Housing,
Transportation, Employment, Phase 2 Report
etc.?
Opportunity Mapping
38. Education
◦ Math & Reading Scores
◦ Graduation Rates
◦ Student Poverty
◦ Teacher Qualifications
◦ Educational Attainment
Economics & Mobility
◦ Jobs & Job Change
◦ % on Public Assistance
◦ Unemployment Rates
◦ Mean Commute Time
◦ Business Vacancy Rates
Housing &
Neighborhoods
◦ Home Ownership Rates
◦ Residential Vacancy Rates
◦ Median Home Values
◦ Poverty Rates
◦ Proximity to Hazardous Sites
Mapping Opportunity
46. Assuring a Fair and Equitable Recovery
◦ Data Collection, Tracking, and Transparency
◦ Targeted, Equitable Reinvestment for Hard-Hit Communities
◦ Assuring Jobs Reach Those in Greatest Need
Creating Pathways to Opportunity
◦ Community of Opportunity Model: Opening the “Levers” of
Opportunity
◦ People, Places, and Linkages
Equitable and Sustainable Fiscal and Economic Policy
◦ Reforming the State Tax Structure
◦ High Road Economic Development: Not a continuation of policies
that encourage unsustainable growth and low-wage job creation
Phase 2 Conclusions
47. Measuring the Employment
Impact of ARRA
◦ Who has been most impacted by rising
unemployment?
◦ Is ARRA creating jobs in hard-hit
communities?
◦ What industries or programs are
experiencing success?
Is ARRA Contract
Procurement Equitable?
◦ Are minority-owned firms receiving
Federal and State contracts?
◦ Are procurement goals being met?
Phase 3 Report
ARRA Jobs & Contracting
53. Improve Tracking of ARRA Spending
◦ Track recipients of jobs created with ARRA funding by demographics
and job quality
◦ Require reporting by all sub-contractors down to end-user
◦ Report the percent of state and local transportation contracts that go
to Black, Latino, and Women-owned enterprises
Increase Small & Minority Business Participation
◦ Unbundle large contracts for small businesses
◦ Set specific DBE participation goals for the construction industry,
and actively recruit African American-owned businesses into this
sector
Ensure That Disadvantaged Communities Get Jobs
◦ Use first source hiring to make sure local communities get jobs
◦ Require recipients of ARRA funding to use apprentices or on-the-job
trainees
◦ Utilize bonding to increase employment opportunities for ex-
offenders
Phase 3 Conclusions
54. Are Federal programs helping to alleviate
Florida’s housing crisis?
How are NSP funds being used to alleviate
Florida’s housing crisis?
Is NSP helping to stabilize Florida’s rental
housing markets?
Is NSP helping to create jobs in Florida’s hard-
hit communities?
Phase 4 Research
56. Opportunity mapping in the Baltimore region
was conducted as part of the Thompson v.
HUD fair housing litigation
◦ Plaintiffs used opportunity mapping to frame their
remedial proposal, in response to a liability ruling that
found the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development in violation of the Fair Housing Act
◦ The plaintiffs have proposed establishing 7,000
affordable housing units in the region’s high-
opportunity communities, available to volunteers who
wish to relocate out of the City of Baltimore’s public
housing
Thompson v. HUD
57. Fair housing Litigation in Baltimore
◦ brought on behalf of 14,000 African-American
residents of public housing
◦ in response to history of racial segregation of public
housing
◦ Represented by Maryland ACLU and NAACP Legal
Defense Fund
US District Court of Maryland, Judge Marvin
Garbis
◦ Began in 1995…judge issued liability ruling in 2005
found HUD liable for violating the federal Fair Housing Act
Thompson v. HUD
57
58. Use of 14 indicators of
neighborhood opportunity to
designate high and low
opportunity neighborhoods in the
Baltimore region
Indicators of Opportunity (General)
◦ Neighborhood Quality/Health
Poverty, Crime, Vacancy, Property
Values, Population Trends
◦ Economic Opportunity
Proximity to Jobs and Job Changes,
Public Transit
◦ Educational Opportunity
School Poverty, School Test Scores,
Teacher Qualifications
Opportunity Mapping in Baltimore
58
59. Subsidized housing
opportunities in Baltimore
are generally clustered in
the region’s lowest
opportunity
neighborhoods
Subsidized housing as a
way of connecting people
to opportunity
Opportunity and Housing
59
60. Outside of the litigation, the opportunity maps have
been used in a variety of ways
◦ Program evaluation and planning
Monitoring partial consent decree program
◦ Identifying Opportunities/Challenges
Assessing opportunities/challenges related to the foreclosure crisis
◦ Regional housing advocacy
Baltimore Regional Housing Coalition
◦ Research
Tracking outcomes for families who move to high opportunity areas
(John Hopkins)
Impacts
60
61. Background on this project
◦ Originated from effort to incorporate
mapping analysis into legal services
Partners
◦ Massachusetts Law Reform Institute,
MA Legal Assistance Corp
(foundation) and other Legal Services
Entities
◦ Year long process of meeting with
stakeholders to understand mapping
needs and issues
◦ Training with service providers &
agencies (using mapping for
programming)
MA Legal Services and Opportunity
Communities
61
62. Three areas of
opportunity were
analyzed using
GIS mapping
capability:
◦ Education Quality and
Opportunity
◦ Economic Health and
Transportation
◦ Neighborhood
Stability and Health
Mapping Communities of Opportunity:
Methods and Indicators
62
63. Program design and use within the legal services
◦ New programming – proposed “Adopt A Zip Code” program
◦ Use in exploring client concerns/challenges
◦ Use in litigation (National Consumer Law Center)
◦ Internal use by funder (MLAC)
Direct advocacy
◦ State opportunity impact assessment (proposed)
◦ Dissemination among state agencies
State level program design (public sector)
◦ New $5 million state affordable housing program, targeted to
high opportunity communities
◦ Implementation still unfolding
Impact
63
68. What is this information/approach useful for?
◦ Diagnostics and targeted investments
◦ Identifying areas of opportunity and challenges
Opportunities
◦ Opportunities for investment
Targeting services better, targeting programs
Challenges
◦ E.g. Foreclosure patterns
◦ Looking at broader policy issues and concern
◦ Communications – using maps to illustrate areas of concern,
areas of opportunity, broader community discussions
Concluding Thoughts
69. Thank you!
For questions, comments or for more information:
www.kirwaninstitute.org
or e-mail us at reece.35@osu.edu or martin.1227@osu.edu
69