This was a talk I gave at CU Boulder SEDs in Nov 2011 to showcase the variety and opportunities for student-run science and engineering experiments on suborbital platforms. The area of suborbital space is rapidly expanding and is set to change how we expand our use of technology for future science and exploration space missions.
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Suborbital Opportunities for Students
1. Fly Early, Fly Often, Fly Safe
(science and research on reusable suborbital vehicles)
Dr. Kimberly Ennico
NASA Ames Research Center
November 15, 2011
CU SEDS
3. Photo by C. Conrad
Dr. Kimberly Ennico & Dr. Sam Durrance (STS-35 & STS-67) at the runway
dedication of Spaceport America, Las Cruces, NM, October 22, 2010.
4. Topics du jour
What is Suborbital?
What is Suborbital Science?
What is Commercial Suborbital?
Who are involved?
What are NASA’s roles?
How can you get involved?
5. Topics du jour
What is Suborbital?
What is Suborbital Science?
What is Commercial Suborbital?
Who are involved?
What are NASA’s roles?
How can you get involved?
6. What is Suborbital?
Do reach space
Move through
the atmosphere
of the body from
which it was
launched
Are not traveling
fast enough to
escape gravity
Do not go into
orbit.
Image adapted from Sir Isaac Newton’s
A Treatise of the System of the World (c1680s)
7. Suborbital is nothing new...
A Black Brant Balloon
XII being payload
launched from being
NASA’s Wallops prepped
Flight Facility by the
CSBF in
Palestine,
TX.
May 5, 1961 Alan Shepard’s historic
Redstone rocket flight.
8. Suborbital is International
Institute of Space
and Astronautical
Science (ISAS)
Japanese Balloon
& Sounding
Rocket Program
hs de wS ec ap S
Australian Space Research Norway's
i
Institute Andøya Rocket
Range
hr opa Cgna s E) mi e GA S DAE/
a nu lo e r y na m rt s
u
r
S s ux a M
yili c af
c r
t
9. Major World Spaceports
23
http://www.spacetoday.org/Rockets/Spaceports/LaunchSites.html
*This graphic is a bit dated (see next slide)
10. 21st Century U.S. Spaceports
http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/industry/media/spaceports.gif
13. Student Launch (SL-5)
May 20, 2011
http://www.spaceportamerica.com/
http://www.launchnm.com
14. CU RocketSat
Sounding Rocket Payload Program
Started in 2005 by students
RockSat1 - Launched Sep 25, 2006a
RockSat2 - Launched Apr 28,2007a
RockSat3- Launched June 27, 2007a
RockSat 4 - Launched June 27, 2008b
RockOn/RockSat -
Launched June 26, 2009b
Morphed into the RockSat-C & X programs...
Las Cruces, NM; bWallops, VA
a
http://spacegrant.colorado.edu/COSGC_Projects/rocketsat/
http://spacegrant.colorado.edu/rockon/RockSat/RockSat.htm
15. “Suborbital” has also been used to
describe these platforms...
ER-2
Global
Hawk
WB57
Stratospheric Observatory for
Infrared Astronomy
http://airbornescience.nasa.gov/
http://sofia.usra.edu/
16.
17. Topics du jour
What is Suborbital?
What is Suborbital Science?
What is Commercial Suborbital?
Who are involved?
What are NASA’s roles?
How can you get involved?
18. What is Suborbital Science?
Science enabled by Science enabled by
access to 100 km (62 periods of micro or zero
mile) altitude gravity
Earth Science Biotech
Remote Sensing Gene Expression
Climate Science Fundamental biology
Vertical Atmospheric Sampling Vestibular system
Helioscience Fundamental Physics
Solar storms Fluid dynamics
Observational science Particle agglomeration
Infrared optics Human physiology
Astronomy targets of opportunity Transitional g-response
Astrobiology Radiation effects
DNA/microbes at edge of space Material Science
Metal alloy phase separation
Combustion physics
Technology Development STEM Education Workforce Development
19. What is Suborbital Science?
Science Payloads
Science Payloads
Technology Development STEM Education Workforce Development
20. High Altitude Science Spotlight
Study of the mechanisms by
which TGFs (Terrestrial
Gamma-ray Flashes) are
produced by lightning
Approach to have sensor
permanently mounted on the
suborbital vehicle
γ-ray detector, wave receiver &
optical photometer
High flight frequency &
routine flights enables
cataloging of (1-2 ms) events
and monitoring
PI: Joanne Hill, GSFC
http://science.nasa.gov/science-
Platform: Lynx, SS2 news/science-at-nasa/2010/29jan_firefly/
23. Microgravity Science
NASA Glenn's 5 second Zero
Gravity Facility
Drop Towers
Parabolic Aircraft
Zero Gravity Corporation
24. Microgravity Science Spotlight
A proposed study on how Itokawa
“rubble pile” asteroids
form and stick
An experimental study
of
the mechanical
reorientation of ejecta 535 × 294 × 209 meters
blocks in a microgravity
environment
Approach tests methods
of reconstructing the block
distribution from an
imaging dataset
PI: Dan Durda/SwRI
Platform: SF-104, Zero-G,
Blue Origin
27. BioHarness
Suborbital Environment:
Changes in gravity
Science Field:
Life science, physiology
Objective:
To understand the human’s cardiovascular
system response due to instantaneous
changes in gravity by repeatedly sampling a
large population of individuals
Experiment Duration:
Sequences of 5-10 min measurements
Human Tended:
Yes
Specifications:
Mass: 357.2 g
Power: 6VDC (four 1.5V AA Batteries)
Volume: 8.25 x 12.7 x 3.3 cm
Data Volume: supports 24 hr constant monitoring
28. Box of Rocks
Suborbital Environment:
Microgravity
Science Field:
Planetary Science
Objective:
To understand the surface properties of small
asteroids & comets by observing mechanical
reorientation of ejecta blocks in a microgravity
environment.
Experiment Duration:
5 minutes µ−gravity
Human Tended:
Not required
Specifications:
Mass: 7.1kg
Power: 14W
Volume: 35.6 x 29.2 x 20.6 cm*
Data Volume: 45.2 GB*
29. SWUIS
Suborbital Environment:
Access from above 50 km altitude
Science Field:
Earth & atmospheric sciences, planetary
astronomy
Objective:
Wide-field UV-visible imaging
Experiment Duration: (depends on target)
System sensitivity V=8 mag (0.033s),
V=11mag (10sec co-add)
Human Tended:
Yes
Specifications:
Mass: 6.5 kg
Power: <18W (needs 11-15 VDC)
Volume: All parts fit within 45.5 x 45.5 x 10 cm
Data Volume: 40 GB (60 minutes continuous at
30fps)
30. Suborbital SWUIS-type system
Unique observations provided
by unique access at higher
elevations
>100 km (62 mi) Get minutes at twilight (instead of
seconds) enable searches of large areas close to
the Sun
80-100 km (50-62 mi) Meteors form when Earth
intercepts a particle debris stream (meteor showers)
50-100 km (31-62 mi) Sprites & Elve phenomena in
Mesosphere
>50 km (31mi) get above ozone, enable UV observations
20-40 km (12-25 mi) Blue Jets phenomena in
Stratosphere
15 km (9mi) regime of highest aircraft platforms
(manned w/ viewing windows)
8 km (5 mi) get above most of water, enables IR
observations
31. Scientist-operated Remote Sensing
experiments
(targets of opportunity, unique observational
windows provided by altitude)
Repeated sampling
Human physiology
harness/experiments
(vision, heart, motor skills, ...)
Multiple subjects & sampling
Passive microgravity experiments
(biology, physics, fluids, ...)
Remote/autonomously operated
Repeated experiments
the SwRI Approach...
Multiple Science Payloads
per Flight
“More science for your buck!”
32. Topics du jour
What is Suborbital?
What is Suborbital Science?
What is Commercial Suborbital?
Who are involved?
What are NASA’s roles?
How can you get involved?
33. What is Commercial
Suborbital?
Suborbital vehicles under development
by emerging commercial companies
Reusable vehicles
High flight rates
Rapid-turn around
Fly-on-demand
All support unmanned payloads
Some allow human-tended experiments
Lower cost than existing research
methods
34. Topics du jour
What is Suborbital?
What is Suborbital Science?
What is Commercial Suborbital?
Who are involved?
What are NASA’s roles?
How can you get involved?
36. The current players are expanding....
RocketPlane Global
Up Aerospace
Near Space Corp
Virgin Galactic
…and more to come… Armadillo
Aerospace
XCOR Aerospace
Whittinghill Aerospace
4 Frontier’s Star Lab
Masten Space Systems Blue Origin
37. When 1st test flights are
expected
2011
Armadillo Aerospace
Supermod/Stig May 2011
(VTVL / Unpiloted) Jul 2011
Mar 2011
June 2011
Sep 2010
http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home
https://flightopportunities.nasa.gov/platforms/suborbital/supermod/
38. 2011
Blue Origin
August 2011 August 2011
New Shepard
(VTVL / Unpiloted)
New Goddard
test vehicle 2006
Composite
pressure
vessel Mar
2011
http://www.blueorigin.com/
https://flightopportunities.nasa.gov/platforms/suborbital/newshepard/
39. 2011
Masten Space Systems
Xaero Xoie Xombie
(VTVL / Unpiloted) Oct 2009 Nov 2011
Test Stand
Xaero
May 2011
http://masten-space.com/
https://flightopportunities.nasa.gov/platforms/suborbital/xaero/
40. 2010
Virgin Galactic
Space Ship Two
(HTHL/Piloted)
http://www.virgingalactic.com/
http://www.scaled.com/projects/whiteknighttwo_spaceshiptwo_test_summaries
https://flightopportunities.nasa.gov/platforms/suborbital/spaceshiptwo/
41. Photo: Mark Greenberg/Virgin America
April 6, 2011. Opening of SFO’s Terminal 2.
White Knight 2 with Space Ship 2, underneath, visits SFO.
43. Zero-G 2008
(not a suborbital vehicle, but an excellent venue for training)
G-Force One
(Boeing 727-200F )
FAST 2009 Flight
FAST 2010 Flight
http://www.gozerog.com/
https://flightopportunities.nasa.gov/platforms/parabolic/gforce-one/
44. Who are Involved?
These new commercial suborbital
vehicles are “Complementary not
Competitive” to other suborbital and/or
microgravity platforms
45. How do the platforms compare?
High International
Drop Sounding Parabolic Commercial
Platform Altitude Space
Towers Rockets Flights Suborbital
Balloons Station
Cost $5K $0.5-$1.2M $200-500K $8K $1-2.5M $50-200K
Cont. Time 1-5 30 days to
20 minutes 0 seconds 4 minutes
in µ-gravity seconds seconds months
Quality of
High High None Low High High
Microgravity
Multiple Multiple
Launch Once per Once every Few times a Once every
flights per flights per
frequency month 6 months year 6 months
day day
Few Several Few
Prep Time Few days ~ 1 year ~ 1year
months Years months
Payload 500-1000 < 700 kg
< 450 kg < 680 kg < 1500 kg 20 - 100 kg
Mass kg ~1kg return
Altitude 150 m 50-1,500 km 45-50 km 10 km 300 km 100 km
Maximum
25-65 g 20 g 1-1.5 g 2-4 g 2-4 g 2-4 g
g-loading
Human
Tended No No No Yes Yes Yes
Science
46. How do the platforms compare?
High International
Drop Sounding Parabolic Commercial
Platform Altitude Space
Towers Rockets Flights Suborbital
Balloons Station
Cost $5K $0.5-$1.2M $200-500K $8K $1-2.5M $50-200K
Cont. Time 1-5 30 days to
20 minutes 0 seconds 4 minutes
in µ-gravity seconds seconds months
Quality of
High High None Low High High
Microgravity
Multiple Multiple
Launch Once per Once every Few times a Once every
flights per flights per
frequency month 6 months year 6 months
day day
Few Several Few
Prep Time Few days ~ 1 year ~ 1year
months Years months
Payload 500-1000 < 700 kg
< 450 kg < 680 kg < 1500 kg 20 - 100 kg
Mass kg ~1kg return
Altitude 150 m 50-1,500 km 45-50 km 10 km 300 km 100 km
Maximum
25-65 g 20 g 1-1.5 g 2-4 g 2-4 g 2-4 g
g-loading
Human
Tended No No No Yes Yes Yes
Science
47. Why Commercial Suborbital?
Hi-Alt
Aircraft
Scientific
Balloon
Sounding
Satellite
Rocket
Science
Commercial
Remote Sensing
Drop Tower
Suborbital
Science
Microgravity
Parabolic ISS
Aircraft
Increasing TRL
Commercial suborbital can be used for instrument
TRL-raising for future satellite and space station experiments
49. Founded 1869 Founded 1869
20 Leagues 1 League
246 Teams/Clubs 30 Teams/Clubs
50. Why Commercial Suborbital?
Cost effectiveness
Instrument flexibility
Leverages private investment
Unique capabilities
fly-on-demand
rapid-turnaround
human-in-the-loop
Hands-on experience
Diverse research areas
51. Topics du jour
What is Suborbital?
What is Suborbital Science?
What is Commercial Suborbital?
Who are involved?
What are NASA’s roles?
How can you get involved?
52. Researchers Investors
Scientists Insurancers
Technologists Launch Providers
What are NASA’s Roles?
Academics Integrators
Educators Spaceports
Government ...
...
Special NASA’s Flight
Interests Opportunities
Groups Program working
here now
Primarily facilitator
®ulatory roles,
also user & supplier
(at certain times)
“Current Players” image courtesy of Alexander van Dijk
(ARC/Flight Opportunities)
53. Oh no! Not
another org
chart!
What are NASA’s Roles?
Human Exploration &
Operations (HEOMD)
54. What are NASA’s Roles?
Office of the Chief Technologist
Partnerships, Crosscutting
Early Stage Game Changing
Innovation & Capabilities
Innovation Technology
Commercial Demonstrations
Space • Research Grants • Development • Technology Demo
• NIAC Program Missions
• SBIR/STTR • Franklin Small Edison Small
Strategic • Centennial Satellite Satellite Demo
Integration Challenges Subsystems Missions
• Center Innovation Technologies •Flight
Funds Opportunities
TRL 1-3 TRL 3-5 TRL 5-7
Flight Opportunities
CRuSR FAST
SRLV Parabolic Orbital
Commercial Reusable Suborbital Research (CRuSR)
Facilitated Access to the Space Environment for Technology (FAST)
Suborbital Reusable Launch Vehicle (SRLV)
55. This sounds so cool, but...
How much is NASA investing
in commercial suborbital?
56. NASA’S FY2011 Budget ~$19B
NASA today gets 0.47% of the Federal Budget, about $19B
57. NASA’S FY2011 Budget ~$19B
How money is divided up %
57% Human Space Flight (blue); 35% Science (Yellow/Orange);
3% Technology (Green); 1% Education (Pink); 4% Aeronautics (Red)
58. NASA’S FY2011 Budget ~$19B
How money is divided up $B
$11B Human Space Flight (blue); $6.5B Science (Yellow/Orange);
$570M Technology (Green); $190M Education (Pink); $760 Aeronautics (Red)
59. NASA Agency Budget NASA Technology Budget
Commercial Suborbital is
0.03 *0.026 = 0.008 = 0.8 % NASA Budget
= ~$14M/yr
60. What are NASA’s Roles?
https://flightopportunities.nasa.gov/
61. Topics du jour
What is Suborbital?
What is Suborbital Science?
What is Commercial Suborbital?
Who are involved?
What are NASA’s roles?
How can you get involved?
62. How can YOU* get involved?
Fly a pathfinder payload on existing platforms
Participate in proposal opportunities
Join the Commercial Space Federation
Research & Education Affiliates**
Take suborbital payload specialist training***
(if applicable)
Attend conferences (e.g., NSRC)
Hold special sessions on suborbital platforms at
established conference venues (e.g., AGU, ACS,
AAS)
**non-gov’t only
***18 yrs and older
*The student, scientist, educator, researcher, user, ...
63. Developing your own pathfinder payloads:
Rock-On
Rockon!
Next Workshop
June 16 - 21, 2012
Wallops Flight
Facility, Virginia
RockSat-C
canister payload for
sounding rocket
RockSat-X
more modular
payload interface
http://spacegrant.colorado.edu/rockon/
64. Developing your own pathfinder payloads:
CanSat
Yearly Competition,
each year has a unique goal
Goal 2012 Planetary
Atmospheric Entry Vehicle
Organized by the American
Astronautical Society (AAS)
and American Institute of
Aeronautics and Astronautics
(AIAA)
Team Application due:
Nov 30, 2011
Flight:
June 2012,
Cross Plains, Texas
http://www.cansatcompetition.com/Main.html
http://www.cansatcompetition.com/Mission.html
65. Developing your own pathfinder payloads:
High Altitude Student Platform (HASP)
Yearly Call comes out each
September
Proposal winners get a flight.
You need to have provided
other ways to build your
payload.
Proposals Due:
Dec 16, 2011
Selections Made:
Jan 2012
Integration on HASP:
July/Aug 2012
Flight:
September 2012,
Fort Sumner, New Mexico.
http://laspace.lsu.edu/hasp
66. Developing your own pathfinder payloads:
Microgravity University
Yearly Call comes out each
September
Proposal winners get a flight.
You need to have provided other
ways to build your payload.
Letter Intent Due:
Sept 14, 2011
Proposals Due:
Oct 26, 2011
Selections Made:
Dec 7, 2011
(you get about 4-6 months to
ready your experiment)
Flight:
June 2012
You get to fly on parabolic
aircraft
(max of 5 flyers/team)
http://microgravityuniversity.jsc.nasa.gov/
67. Developing your own pathfinder payloads:
SSEP (Student Spaceflight Experiments Program)
Experiments now only for ISS (Shuttle
Program retired)
Announcement Nov 7, 2011
Next payloads launch on
Soyuz 32 and F9/Dragon
Current call: SSEP Mission 2 to ISS
Funding for building payload is provided,
typically through sponsorships
Submit Plan by Feb 27, 2012
More detailed proposal
due Apr 30, 2012
Downselect to 3 teams May 2012
with series of reviews
Delivery of flight experiments
Aug 22, 2012
Soyuz 32 launch Sep 26, 2012
Return on Soyuz 31 Nov 12, 2012
http://ssep.ncesse.org/ (6.7 weeks on ISS)
68. Developing your own pathfinder payloads:
DIME (Dropping In a Microgravity Environment) &
WING (What If No Gravity?)
Drop Tower Experiments
at NASA’s Glenn Research
Center
Annual Middle School & High
School Competition
Proposals due November
Selections made December
Drop tests occur in March
Can get funding from NASA
space grant consortiums!
http://spaceflightsystems.grc.nasa.gov/DIME.html
69. How to Fly a Science Investigation
There is not yet a
fixed path for this
activity
NASA Flight
Opportunity
model is “in the
same spirit” as
the Airborne
Science
Operations Flight
Request System
(SOFRS)
http://airbornescience.nasa.gov/sofrs/
Note: Proposals for high-altitude aircraft payloads will continue to go through SMD
ROSES (if available that year). Aircraft flight services proposals (using existing
instruments, e.g. AVIRIS/ASTER) go through the established NASA SOFRS program.
70. How to Fly a Science Investigation
https://flightopportunities.nasa.gov/opportunities/how-to-apply/
Note: Sounding Rocket & Balloon Payload Proposals continue to go through their est.
SMD/ROSES AITT, G/LCAS, SHP LCAS, PAST, ASP, APRET(APRA) funding lines.
71. How to Fly a Science Investigation
on Commercial Suborbital
√
√
Instrument Compatibility check
Idea NASA / OCT Interface NASA Flight
Space Grant
R&D Grants
Opportunities Flight Profile
Flight Data
Institution
from your
NASA /
Other...
“Open Call” Safety Review
DoD
NSF
NIH
Life SOMD
Science &
√
uGravity Purchase
NASA / SMD Instrument Flights
(ROSES)
Earth and Interface Commercial
√
Space
Flight Profile Suborbital
Science
& µGrav Vehicles
Instrument
Interface
CIR
Letter of Endorsement from Vehicle Vendor
KEY: Funding Routes
Est. Funding
√ Opportunities
Possible Future
Funding
NASA Flight
“Open Call”
√ Peer Review
& µGrav Vehicles
√
Selection
Purchase
Commercial
Suborbital
Flights
Compatibility check
Safety Review
Flight Profile
Instrument Commercial
Your
√
Idea Purchase Suborbital Flight Data
Flight
Grants Flights & µGrav Vehicles
Interface
72. How can you get involved?
http://www.commercialspaceflight.org/
73. How can you get involved?
http://www.commercialspaceflight.org/research_and_education_affiliates.shtml
74. Payload Specialist Training for
Commercial Suborbital Vehicles
How can you get involved?
http://www.nastarcenter.com/
http://www.nastarcenter.com/space/suborbital_scientist
75. Next Generation Suborbital
Researcher Conferences
How can you get involved?
NSRC 2010 NSRC 2011
Feb 18-20, 2010 Feb 28-Mar 2, 2011
Boulder, CO Orlando, FL
250+ attendees 350+ attendees
70 talks 100 talks, 20 posters
13 sponsors 25 sponsors
76. NSRC 2012
How can you get involved?
Conference dates
Feb 27-29, 2012
Palo Alto, CA
Registration is open
Abstracts due
Dec 2, 2011
http://nsrc.swri.edu
79. Fly Early, Fly Often, Fly Safe
(science and research on reusable suborbital vehicles)
Thank you.
Questions?
Editor's Notes
Treatise: English transition of Book 2 of the Principia. But appeared after Newton’s death. After Newton's death in 1727, the relatively accessible character of its writing encouraged the publication of an English translation in 1728 (by persons still unknown, not authorized by Newton's heirs). Famous Newton CanonBall Diagram Scenario C & D: At least 7.8 km/s (28,200 kph, 17,500 mph). Scenario A & B are suborbital. Scenario C & D are orbital. Scenario E leaves the system. Scenario E: To leave planet Earth an escape velocity of 11.2 km/s (approx. 40,320 km/h, or 25,000 mph) is required. To leave the solar system (escape the Sun’s gravity) you need to be traveling 42.1 km/s (152,000 km/hr or 95,000 mph.
Scientific Balloon Facility, the facility was established in Boulder, Colorado in 1961 under the National Science Foundation. Renamed the National Scientific Balloon Facility (NSBF) in July 1972. In 1982 NSBF came under NASA rather than NSF. NSBF renamed CSBF (Columbia Scientific Balloon Facility) in Aug 2005. On May 5, 1961, atop Redstone rocket Shepard flew 16 minutes to max altitude of 187 km (116 mi). He never orbited the Earth. Shepard got to fly again ~10 years later on Apollo 14, and walked on the moon Feb 5, 1971.
Program sponsored by NASA’s “Summer of Innovation Program.” 21 student experiments on board. Experiments include 35 sensors including electromagnetic field, carbon dioxide detectors, radiation, acceleration, temperature, pressure and electricity sensor. http://www.launchnm.com
How many of you are involved in this program? What did you fly? What did you learn?
They do not “reach the edge of space” but they still Move through the atmosphere of the body from which it was launched Are not traveling fast enough to escape gravity Do not go into orbit.
Suborbital science is inherently cross-cutting.
Suborbital science is inherently cross-cutting.
Discovered in the mid-1990s by the Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory They seem to have a connection with lightning, but TGFs themselves are something entirely different. Gamma-rays produced at stratospheric altitudes are readily observable from 60-100 km Although TGFs are quite brief (1-2 milliseconds), they appear to be the most energetic events on Earth. They belch destructive gamma-rays packing over ten million times the energy of visible light photons – enough punch to penetrate several inches of lead. In the skies above a thunderstorm, powerful electric fields generated by the storm stretch upward for many miles into the upper atmosphere. These electric fields accelerate free electrons, whisking them to speeds approaching the speed of light. When these ultra-high speed electrons collide with molecules in the air, the collisions release high-energy gamma rays as well as more electrons, setting up a cascade of collisions and perhaps more TGFs. Experiments has a gamma-ray detector, wave receiver and photometer experiment---Get simultaneous measurements of the gamma ray, the optical signature in the lightning flash and radio waves radiated by the lightning Atmosphere-Space Interactions Monitor, or ASIM, is a European Space Agency mission that will fly aboard the International Space Station and observe TGFs. ASIM is scheduled to be mounted on the Columbus External Payload Facility in 2014.
Airplane – 6.6 mi (10.6 km) Troposphere Weather Balloon – 11.3-22.7 mi (18-37 km) Stratosphere Suborbital Craft – flies up to 62 mi (100 km) Way up into the Mesosphere and Thermosphere
Views of Earth: Airline, Balloon, Suborbital and ISS Top Left Airliner: 737 Airlines in 2009 flying over Canadian Rockies. Top Right: Teddy-Nauts. Dec 2008. The project was part of the Cambridge University Spaceflight program, which worked with 11- and 12-year-olds from nearby schools to encourage science education. The bears rose 100,000 feet (19miles) in the air and stayed there for two hours and nine minutes. Thanks to a GPS system attached to the bear. Bottom Left: Suborbital prediction Bottom Right: Image from ISS of Hurricane Felix Sept 2007.
Drop Towers: NASA Glenn runs “The Zero G Facility” drop tower provides a near weightless or microgravity environment for 5.18 seconds as the experiment vehicle free falls, in a vacuum, for 432 ft. Evacuating the chamber to a pressure of less than 0.01 torr lowers the aerodynamic drag on the free falling vehicle to less than 0.00001 g. At the end of the free fall the experiment vehicle is stopped at a mean rate of 35 g in the decelerator cart. The decelerator cart is 12 feet in diameter and 20 feet in depth and is filled with small spheres of expanded polystyrene. The expanded polystyrene safely stops the drop vehicle in a distance of about 15 feet. More than 4500 drops have been conducted in the facility since it became operational in 1966. ESA runs the drop tower 'Bremen' features a 110 meter (360 ft) high drop chamber with a diameter of 3.5 m that can be evacuated. An ensemble of 18 pumps allows the attainment of a residual pressure in the chamber of 1 Pa within 2.5 hours. Parabolic Aircraft: NASA has been flying parabolic flights on NASA-owned KC-135 and C-9B aircraft for decades out of Ellington Field under the management of the Johnson Space Center's Reduced Gravity Office. NASA awarded a contract to the Zero Gravity Corporation in January 2008 to provide commercial parabolic aircraft flights to simulate variable gravity environments for research and development work. Each flight includes 40-60 parabolic trajectories. NASA Flight Weeks will generally be conducted out of Ellington Field in Houston, Texas. The aircraft can provide about 25 seconds of near-zero-gravity conditions during each parabolic maneuver. It can provide variable gravity levels between zero and one, including 0.16 g for lunar conditions and 0.38 g for Mars conditions. An increased gravity level of up to 1.8 g can be provided for up to one minute. Such flights are conducted on specially-configured aircraft, and provide a period of up to 20 seconds of reduced gravity or weightlessness. During a flight campaign, which normally consists of three individual flights, around 30 parabolas are flown on each flight, i.e. around 90 parabolas in total. On each parabola, there is a period of increased gravity (1.8 g) which lasts for 20 seconds immediately prior to and following the 20 second period of reduced gravity.
Itokawa is likely “all-regolith” small rubble pile composed of gravel to boulder-sized fragments loosely bound together by its own feeble gravity. Rubble piles have low density because there are large cavities between the various 'chunks' that comprise them. Itokawa no obvious impact craters and is thus almost certainly a coalescence of shattered fragments Microgravity environment provides free collisions in the sub-cm/s velocity range Derive block shapes from imaging (i.e. using 2D projections in images to known 3D axes ratios) Rubble piles have low density because there are large cavities between the various 'chunks' that comprise them. Most of the boulders on Itokawa originated from disruption of a larger parent body -> then spread uniformly across surface. BUT the smaller boulders would have been redistributed by seismic shaking (from other impact grating); gravel would migrate into the smooth terrains of low grav potential. Finer particles have higher mobility (due to low friction angle). Larger boulders could not move easily and got stranded Laboratory impact experiments indicate shape of fragments over a broad size range is distributed around the mean value of the axial ratio 2:sqrt(2):1 Laboratory impact experiments produce fragments of size a:b:c=1:0.7:0.5 (e.g. Capaccioni, F. et al. 1984 & 1986, Fujikawa, A. et al. 1978) Hayabusa hi-res images of asteroid 25143 Itokawa derive a similar shape distribution for blocks in the coarse rubble-pile regolith
Flew by the shuttle astronauts in the 1989-1995 as voluntary experiments done by some of the astronauts. Periods of onset gravity only occurred at the end of each mission, so the data points are limited. Multiple flights per day/week by these vehicles will provide opportunities for large samples of data never obtained before. Test Program F104 Starfighter (6Gs) Nov 2010, NASTAR Testing May 2011.
Using COTS components -- low-cost, iterative design Nov 2010 Testing on F-104 Starfighter zero-g parabolas Evaluated rock size, distribution, visibility for volume March 2011 Vibration Workmanship Risk reduction test for Blue Origin launch profile TBR 2011 Zero-G Gather “0-25s” timescale data ~$2K for one box/camera system. Add in costs of a laptop for storage of data and some batteries to power the cameras & LEDs. 7.1 kg, 14W, 35.6x29.2x20.6cm, 45.2GB (2 camera/2 box config)
SWUIS is a portable, compact, rugged, platform adaptable, inexpensive, scientist-in-the-loop, real-time, sensitive, UV/visible camera & data storage system. Shuttle Version: Flew on two STS flights STS-85 (Discovery) Aug 1997, Unique wide-field observations of Hale Bopp in UV; STS-93 (Columbia) Jul 1999, Observed the clouds of Venus Searched for faint emissions in the Jovian system, Mapped the Moon in the UV for the first time, Searched for a hypothesized asteroid belt ("The Vulcanoids") inside Mercury's orbit (top image) STS093-347-027 (23-27 July 1999) --- Astronauts Steven A. Hawley (left) and Michel Tognini, mission specialists, are pictured with the Southwest Ultraviolet Imaging System (SWUIS) on the middeck of the Space Shuttle Columbia. SWUIS was used during the mission to image planets and other solar system bodies in order to explore their atmospheres and surfaces in ultraviolet (UV) region of the spectrum, which astronomers value for diagnostic work. Tognini represents the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES) of France. Aircraft Version: First demonstration flights SR-71 Blackbird 1993 , 14 completed science observation campaigns between 1997-1999, System adaptable for multiple Aircraft, WB-57 , F/A-19B , USAF NKC 135-E (FISTA) (middle version): Alan Stern in the SR-71 in 1998. Resurrection 2010: Current system has a 4.3 x 5.0 FOV (test lens) Bottom image, some aliveness testing on roof of SwRI Feb 2011 by Robert Smith
Virgin Galactic - White Knight Two & Space Ship Two XCOR - Lynx (artists representation) Armadillo - showing their Mod vehicle under test in 2008 Blue Origin - showing their New Goddard vehicle under test in 2006 Masten - showing their Xombie vehicle under test in 2009
This is a very dynamic area Yellow Box are the Winners from a NASA Sponsored Grant August 2011 http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/aug/HQ_11-258_Flight_Opportunities.html White Box are those starting to demonstrate test flights, new to the arena
Stig is “Supermod with cylindrical tanks” Photo: top right is from Mar 31, 3011 Stig “hover test” bottom right is from Sept 16, 2010 free flight test June 2011 Dalek reached a height of 4,796 feet (1,461 meters). But engine instability 11 seconds into the flight caused rocket fins to break off and other debris from the engine compartment to flutter to the ground. July 2011 testing of Stig
The company's innovative 'pusher' Launch Abort System (LAS) was one of the technologies that was of particular interest to NASA. To date abort systems have been of the tractor variety, which pulls a crew vehicle to safety in case of an emergency. The spacecraft is based on technology like that used for the McDonnell Douglas DC-X and derivative DC-XA. In late August 2011 lost the vehicle during a developmental test at Mach 1.2 and an altitude of 45,000 feet. They are working on a new design now.
November 2, 2009 it was announced that Masten Space Systems had won first place in the level two category, with Armadillo Aerospace coming in second Xogdor another test vehicle
feathered flight -- demonstration of their reentry configuration SpaceShipTwo is the prototype for the world's first commercial manned spaceship, destined to take private astronauts into space and paving the way for space transportation. The duration of the flights will be approximately 2.5 hours, though only a few minutes of that will be in space. The price will initially be $200,000. last test flight (as of this presentation) 29 Sept 2011.
The company is in the business of developing and producing safe, reliable and re-usable rocket engines and rocket powered vehicles. Lynx is a small rocket-powered aircraft capable of carrying one pilot, a ticketed passenger and/or a payload in a suborbital trajectory. Mark I (Prototype) will fly to 61 km (200,000 ft) and can provide nearly one minute (56 seconds) of microgravity. Mark II (Production Model) will be able to reach 100 km (330,000 ft) with almost three minutes (186 seconds) of microgravity. Lynx uses its own fully reusable rocket propulsion system to depart from a runway and return safely. Because it lacks any propulsion system other than its rocket engines, the Lynx will have to be towed to the end of the runway. The Lynx production models (designated Lynx Mark II) are designed to be robust, multi-commercial mission vehicles capable of flying to 100+ km in altitude up to four times per day and are being offered on a wet lease basis. (www.xcor.com) The first group of XCOR Lynx payload integration specialist firms include the following (in alphabetical order): the African Space Institute of Durban, South Africa; Cosmica Spacelines of Toulouse, France; NanoRacks of Lexington, Kentucky and Washington, D.C.; the Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) in Boulder, Colorado; Space Chariots in Oxon, England; Space Experience Curaçao of the Netherlands and the Caribbean island of Curaçao; Spaceflight Services in Tukwila, Washington, Valencia, California, and Huntsville, Alabama; and Yecheon Astro Space Center, Yecheon, South Korea.
It flies parabolic arcs similar to those of NASA's KC-135 Reduced gravity aircraft, but was designed to be less expensive to purchase and maintain The Safety Approval, granted on April 20, 2011 and in effect for five years, allows ZERO-G to offer reduced gravity parabolic flight profiles to prospective suborbital launch operators to meet the applicable components of the crew qualification and training requirements outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 460.5). These regulations require crew members to complete training on how to carry out their roles on board or on the ground and to demonstrate the ability to withstand the stresses of spaceflight, which may include high acceleration or deceleration, microgravity, and vibration.
ISS payload 700 kg is for the International Standard Payload Rack (ISPR) available payload mass. Other configurations are possible, usually smaller in mass. Sounding rockets can actually reach 3000 km, but for smaller payloads (1000lbs=450kg) at $5M.
ISS payload 700 kg is for the International Standard Payload Rack (ISPR) available payload mass. Other configurations are possible, usually smaller in mass. Sounding rockets can actually reach 3000 km, but for smaller payloads (1000lbs=450kg) at $5M.
The goal for FAST is to help emerging technologies move from TRL 4-5 to TRL 6-7. Managers typically consider TRL 6 to be the minimum level of maturity for incorporating new technology in a major development program. The key factor in "bridging the TRL gap" is testing in the space environment.
Alan Stern: My analogy for the relationship between the station and suborbital research is a baseball one: the major leagues rely on the minors as a feeder system and I think this is a similar relationship between station (i.e., the major leagues) and suborbital (i.e., the minors). Without the minor leagues, the majors would be crippled; they would not have the farm teams to develop techniques and players. I think the station can use suborbital in the same way and very cost effectively. Active roster of a major league team may contain a maximum of 25 players. There are 30 teams in MLB. That would make a maximum of 750 players on major league rosters at any one time during a season.
Special Interest Groups -- like space tourism, will eventually fall under FAA. Not a NASA concern. Acronyms: FAA AST : Office of Commercial Space Transportation in the Federal Aviation Administration; NASA FOP : NASA”s Flight Opportunities Program; NASA : National Aeronautics & Space Administration; SARG : Suborbital Applications Research Group; NSRC : Next Generation Suborbital Researchers Conference
It’s important to note where Commercial Suborbital has been placed in the NASA architecture. This mainly affects funding for now, but does have implications for how this new item is to be integrated into the larger picture at NASA.
Commercial Reusable Suborbital Research (CRuSR) and Facilitated Access to the Space Environment for Technology (FAST) are hosted within NASA’s Flight Opportunities Program within the Office of the Chief Technologist (OCT). NASA is not interested in establishing specific payload interface standards. The market, the users and the vehicle providers, will determine what is the vehicle interface. NASA’s job in the Flight Opportunities Program is to try to bring the two sides of that market together. The Ames responsibility in the area of safety is to assess each payload for the risk of harming the vehicle, crew or ground personnel, and interfering with any vehicle systems or other payloads. If the risk is found to be unacceptable, Ames may suggest mitigations or refuse to allow the payload to fly. Because these are opportunities for researchers to try new things which means taking greater risks, the successful operation of the payload is should be the responsibility of the researcher. Interface properly to the launch vehicles without increasing risks to the launch vehicle performance or reliability.
NASA working for and with commercial and educational institutions to further science and technology of use to all. NASA trying to get in the middle between the supply (vendor) and the demand (researchers)
Get involved now! You can be working on payloads now on existing platforms which you can later tailor for the rSLVs!
is a hands-on workshop where participants learn to build a small rocket payload and launch it on a sounding rocket at NASA's Wallops Flight Facility (follow a kit) RockSat-C -- design a payload that fits within a canister to ride on a sounding rocket, submit intent in September, if viable, you have three reviews & monthly progress reports, CDR in Dec, fly payloads in the Jan-Jun timeperiod.
“ launch an autonomous cansat with a deployable lander containing one large raw hen egg” there are restrictions on how fast the payload descends, etc. to allow for scoring.
Designed to carry up to twelve student payloads to an altitude of about 36 kilometers with flight durations of 15 to 20 hours using a small volume, zero pressure balloon. It is anticipated that the payloads carried by HASP will be designed and built by students and will be used to flight-test compact satellites or prototypes and to fly other small experiments. However, student teams must provide their own funding to support payload development and integration and there are a few document “deliverables” that the teams must supply.
Generating an idea for a microgravity experiment is the first stage in competing for a program “slot.” The idea for a reduced gravity experiment is developed by a team of undergraduate students - either as part of a class project or as independent research. The Reduced Gravity Student Flight Opportunities Program provides a unique academic experience for undergraduate students to successfully propose, design, fabricate, fly and evaluate a reduced gravity experiment of their choice over the course of four-six months. The overall experience includes scientific research, hands-on experimental design, test operations and educational/public outreach activities.
SSEP Mission 1 to the International Space Station Started July 31, 2011. Need to have your LOI in by Sept 15, 2011, Proposals due Nov 28, 2011. Downselect Dec 14, 2011. Hardware due Feb 29, 2012. Launch on Soyuz 30 (Mar 30, 2012). Return on Soyuz 29 (May 16, 2012) Surprised it is so complicated. Grades 5-16 This is a program of the National center for Earth and Space Science Education (NCESSE) and NanoRacks, LLC. SSEP Mission 2 to the International Space Station, the fourth SSEP flight opportunity to date. The SSEP Mission 2 experiments payload will be transported to ISS aboard Soyuz 32, currently scheduled to launch September 26, 2012, and will return to Earth aboard Soyuz 31, currently scheduled for de-orbit on November 12, 2012. Student team experiments will therefore be in orbit for 6.7 weeks according to the current schedule.
DIME is high school WING is grades 5-8 Teams may be formed from (for example) a science class, a group of classes, a science club, a Scout troop, or simply a bunch of friends. A team (whether DIME or WING) must have an adult advisor, such as a teacher, parent, or technical consultant.
Get your instrument on a high-alt aircraft need to go through NASA Airborne Science Program (http://jsc-aircraft-ops.jsc.nasa.gov/wb57/firststeps.html http://airbornescience.nasa.gov/sofrs/ This system was designed to allow researchers that are funded by NASA or other agencies to have access to unique NASA aircraft, as well as commercial aircraft with which NASA has made contracting arrangements. “fee-for-service basis” User fees are paid by the investigator's funding source's research program or directly from the investigator's grant funds. Missions for non-SMD investigators will be approved on a case-by-case basis. Missions that do not benefit NASA or SMD research objectives will not be sponsored by the SMD program, and must pay for the facilities under a full-cost reimbursable basis, and in addition, must demonstrate that the NASA SMD facilities provide a unique capability that is not available through commercial sources.
AITT - Airborne Instrument Technology Transition (Appendix A.24) G/LCAS -Geospace Low Cost Access to Space (Appendix B.3) SHP LCAS - Solar & Heliophysics Low Cost Access to Space (Appendix B.4) PAST - Planetary Astronomy Program (Appendix C.5) ASP - Astrobiology Small Payloads (Appendix C.25) APRET - Astrophysics Research & Enabling Technology Program (Appendix D.3) (formerly APRA/Astrophysics Research & Analysis Program)
This slides shows THREE PATHS. Top 1: Using another NASA grant to fund the payload development. Middle: Using a non-NASA grant to fund payload development. Bottom: The ultimate path without needing Flight opportunities and also a way you can still operate now if you have your funds. You are writing one or two proposals depending on path. The payloads funded for flight will had had some sort of peer review. CIR - SMD will conduct a CRuSR investigation review (CIR) for all CRuSR vehicle projects ROSES is a yearly call. ROSES SMD Section IV(f) and ROSES SMD Appendix A1 Section 4.6 [Earth Science] suggests only Terrestrial Ecology (A.4), Ocean Biology and Biogeochemistry (A.3), IceBridge Research (A.11), and HyspIRI Preparatory Airborne Activities and Associated Science (Appendix A.26) are relevant for CRuSR vehicles “In order to be compliant, a clear and convincing scientific, technical, and/or cost argument must be made that use of a CRuSR platform is required to produce the needed results in ways that could not be accomplished through the use of other suborbital platforms.” - Section IV(f) For Astrophysics/Heliophysics/Planetary Science, the applicable areas for CRuSR may be AITT - Airborne Instrument Technology Transition (Appendix A.24) G/LCAS -Geospace Low Cost Access to Space (Appendix B.3), SHP LCAS - Solar & Heliophysics Low Cost Access to Space (Appendix B.4), PAST - Planetary Astronomy Program (Appendix C.5), ASP - Astrobiology Small Payloads (Appendix C.25), and APRET - Astrophysics Research & Enabling Technology Program (Appendix D.3) (formerly APRA/Astrophysics Research & Analysis Program) Apparently ESMD & SOMD are merging. Life science & microgravity would be covered there within NASA. Flight Opportunities does welcome instruments from non-NASA sources, just need to demonstrate they are at TRL4 and higher. And you need to indicate when the payload is ready to fly.
Founded in 2005 STIM-Grants program for spaceport infrastructure, FAA regulations and permits, industry safety standards, public outreach, and public advocacy On August 10, 2009, the CSF announced the creation of the Suborbital Applications Research Group (SARG). On November 23, 2009, the CSF announced the creation of the Spaceports Council. On February 18, 2010, the CSF announced a new research and education affiliates program
Mark Sirangelo, said that "Researchers, engineers, and educators will be among the primary beneficiaries of the new generation of low-cost commercial spacecraft, as payload opportunities to space start to grow. We’re excited to create a new category of affiliate membership to strengthen the ties between the Commercial Spaceflight Federation and the research and education community."
On April 7, 2010, George Nield, Associate Administrator for the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation officially declared NASTAR as the first to ever receive FAA Safety Approval designation for our Space Training Programs featuring the STS-400 Space Training Simulator.