2. 1. What is the primary idea of the content in the articles?
The primary idea is how to ban the use of cell phone when driving.
2. Do you think the individual sections and headings in the document (articles) clearly represent the idea that
was communicated. Explain the reasons behind your comments.
Individual sections and headings clearly represent the idea above. It explains the reason why it is dangerous
to use cell phone, why it is not allowed in law, and how to stop the use of cell phone.
3. What details are included in the articles?
It showed several local laws that make cell phone use on driving illegal, and application of cell phone that not
allow to use it in the car.
4. Was there anything that was confusing? If so, what is it?
Nothing was confusing. Everything was clear to me.
5. What is good about the writing? Why is it good?
Those two articles shows many examples, and explains the risk of use in the car in detail.
6. Are there any errors that need to be corrected?
I could not find any errors.
7. What specific suggestions for improving the articles can you make?
If there was any example of car accident in it, it could be more serious article.
8. Identify three basic differences between how your group would author a similar document and how this
author authored it (as you see it in the link).
We might make shorter paragraphs and use easy and strong English to attract interests. We might show
some example of car accidents. We might show the example of law in other countries.
