O slideshow foi denunciado.
Seu SlideShare está sendo baixado. ×

The Dvorak Technique

Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Próximos SlideShares
Weather satellites pd. 5
Weather satellites pd. 5
Carregando em…3
×

Confira estes a seguir

1 de 20 Anúncio

Mais Conteúdo rRelacionado

Diapositivos para si (20)

Anúncio

Semelhante a The Dvorak Technique (20)

Mais recentes (20)

Anúncio

The Dvorak Technique

  1. 1. DVORAK TECHNIQUE Katelyn Hearn
  2. 2. HISTORY OF THE DVORAK TECHNIQUE  1973 Dvorak Technique was invented  1975 for visible imagery  2 satellites with 9km resolution  Used at night  Limited the sampling of max sustained surface winds  1984 for infrared imagery (method)  8 satellites with 4 km resolution  More trustworthy to forecasters  More accurate intensity estimates
  3. 3. WHAT IS THE DVORAK TECHNIQUE?  A systematic procedure for determining the intensity of tropical cyclones using satellite imagery  Objective: provide good estimates of the present and future intensity of cyclones using satellite imagery  Using procedures and rules which combine analysis of satellite imagery with an ideal forecast for tropical cyclone development.
  4. 4. T AND C.I. NUMBERS T (Tropical) C.I. ( Current Intensity)  T numbers range from 1 to 8 (T1 to T8).  Describes tropical disturbances ranging from minimal signs of tropical cyclone intensity (T1) to maximum possible intensity(T8). Relating to minimum sea-level pressure (MSLP).  The T numbers are used to fit the cyclone to a curve of a model or show removal from a curve.  C.I. numbers range from 1 to 8.  Relates directly to the intensity in terms of the max wind speed (MSP).  Not directly related to cloud features.  Two factors affecting the C.I. number:  The surveyed delay in the reduction of MSP after cloud features show weakening.  The climax of the cyclones winds between satellite observations.
  5. 5. T AND C NUMBERS o
  6. 6. TROPICAL CYCLONES AND THEIR CORRESPONDING T NUMBERS
  7. 7. ESTIMATING CYCLONE INTENSITY  Two sets of clouds are analyzed to estimate the cyclone intensity:  First set: Central features, outer banding features, and vertical depth of clouds comprising these features.  Analyzing the intensity is done in three stages:  1: allow modeled estimate of the cyclone’s intensity.  2&3: use cloud patterns and feature measurements to prove or adjust the modeled explanation.  Second set: determines if a forecast along the cyclones curve is to be used for the 24 hour forecast.
  8. 8. CENTRAL FEATURES, OUTER BANDING FEATURES, AND VERTICAL CLOUD DEPTH PARAMETER  Appear within the broad curve of the comma band  Surround or cover the cloud system center  The intensity estimate depends on the size, shape, and definition of CF also the amount of dense overcast with CF  Only the part of the comma cloud band that is overcast  Curves evenly around the central features Central Features (CF) Outer Banding Features (BF) Vertical cloud depth is the depth of the clouds in the CF and BF.
  9. 9. ANALYZING THE INTENSITY OF A CYCLONE  First Stage: Approximate judgment on changes between yesterday’s and today’s cloud features related to cyclone intensity  The CF, BF, and vertical depth parameters are inspected separately determining the recent intensity change  Using this, the T-number from yesterday, and the modeled curve gives an estimate of intensity for present and future of the cyclone  This estimate is then modified up or down due to a change in the environment of the cyclone that has occurred in the past 24 hours.
  10. 10. ANALYZING THE INTENSITY OF A CYCLONE  Second Stage: Considers overall cloud pattern  The pattern of the cyclone is compared to the common tropical cyclone patterns  Once the patterns are compared, the intensity can be either lowered or raised.  The T-number corresponding to the pattern is fixed when cloud features are significant in size or depth.  Third Stage: Component features examined to determine if they agree with intensity in first stage.  Calibrated analysis made for the cloud features studeied qualitatively in the first stage.  Using the flow diagram
  11. 11. CF AND BF DIAGRAM USED TO DETERMINE THE T-NUMBER
  12. 12. FORECAST PROCEDURE  Made by using either the cyclone’s model curve or by adjusting the curve when an interruption due to landfall or unfavorable circulation is indicated.  Abnormal change in T-number, or changes in cloud features that relate to the intensification of the cyclone.  The modeled forecast must be changed when one of three events happens:  First: reversal in trends by past change of intensity.  Second: all signs of intensification appear opposed to the expected trend.  Third: the cyclone is entering or leaving an environment that will effect its trend. To determine the amount of modification of the cyclone in this type of event the cloud features and timing of the occurrence is considered.
  13. 13. FORECASTING USING THE TRANSMISSION CODE  Implies a forecast change of intensity of one number per day
  14. 14. RULES AND PROCEDURES  1. Locate the cloud system center (CSC)  2. Recognize initial development  3. Determine past change of intensity  4. Determine today’s T-number  5. Determine the current intensity number(C.I.)  6. Determine the cyclone’s modeled curve  7. Determine the forecast C.I. number  8. Analyze, analyze, analyze
  15. 15. EXAMPLES Atlantic Hurricane Hugo  September 15, 1989  Estimated maximum sustained surface wind of 59 m/s (114.687 knots) based on the Dvorak Technique.  Situ aircraft reconnaissance data taken at the same time revealed Hugo had maximum wind speeds of 72 m/s (139.957 knots).  Common underestimate because of few low spatial resolution satellites.
  16. 16. PREVIOUSLY UNRECOGNIZED CAT 4 OR 5 TROPICAL CYCLONES November 23, 1978 May 8, 1979 November 7, 1982 November 13, 1984 November 8, 1989
  17. 17. HURRICANE ANITA 1977 Two Visible satellite images taken for 5 days about 6 hours apart.
  18. 18. EXAMPLES OF TROPICAL CYCLONES PATTERNS
  19. 19. HURRICANE ANITA 1977 Enhanced Infrared Imagery of Hurricane Anita in 1977 over a 4 day period.
  20. 20. REFERENCES  B.A. Harper, K. Hoarau, J. A. Knaff, C. W. Landsea, Science. 313,452 (AAAS, 2006).  V. F. Dvorak, Mon. Weather Rev. 103, 420 (1975).  V.F. Dvorak, Satellite Applications Laboratory, NOAA. 18 (1984).

×