2. TABLE OF CONTENTS
Program Update ........................................................................................................................................................ 1
Evaluation Criteria ..................................................................................................................................................... 2
CMP/CMP1 – Clinical Microscopy
Bilirubin .................................................................................................................................................................. 34
Bilirubin, IRIS iChemVELOCITY and iChem 100 (CMP1 only)............................................................................. 40
Blood or Hemoglobin ............................................................................................................................................. 42
Glucose ................................................................................................................................................................. 19
Ketones ................................................................................................................................................................. 26
Leukocyte Esterase ............................................................................................................................................... 49
Nitrite ..................................................................................................................................................................... 57
Osmolality ................................................................................................................................................................ 3
pH, Urine ............................................................................................................................................................... 10
Protein (Qualitative) ............................................................................................................................................... 13
Reducing Substance ............................................................................................................................................. 25
Specific Gravity........................................................................................................................................................ 7
Urobilinogen .......................................................................................................................................................... 60
Urine hCG................................................................................................................................................................ 4
Urine Sediment Photographs ................................................................................................................................ 63
Body Fluid Photographs ........................................................................................................................................ 67
Case Discussion: Pneumocystis in BAL ............................................................................................................... 73
CMMP – Clinical Microscopy Miscellaneous Photographs ...................................................................................... 75
OCB – Occult Blood.................................................................................................................................................. 81
GOCB – Gastric Occult Blood
Gastric Occult Blood .............................................................................................................................................. 82
Gastric pH.............................................................................................................................................................. 83
DSC – Dipstick Confirmatory
Bilirubin, Confirmatory ........................................................................................................................................... 84
Protein, Confirmatory ............................................................................................................................................ 84
Actions Laboratories Should Take when a PT Result is Not Graded ....................................................................... 85
Attestation of Participation for Self-Reported Training ............................................................................................. 86
HEMATOLOGY AND CLINICAL MICROSCOPY RESOURCE COMMITTEE
Joan E. Etzell, MD, FCAP, Chair
Sherrie L. Perkins, MD, PhD, FCAP, Vice Chair
Kyle T. Bradley, MD, MS, FCAP
David R. Czuchlewski, MD, FCAP
John L. Frater Jr., MD, FCAP
Tracy I. George, MD, FCAP
George M. Girgis, MT
Eric D. Hsi, MD, FCAP
David F. Keren, MD, FCAP
Martina Lefterova, MD, PhD
Jennifer L. Oliveira, MD, FCAP
Jay L. Patel, MD, FCAP
Janet Piscitelli, MD, FCAP
Kathryn A. Rizzo, DO, PhD, FCAP
Luke R. Shier, MD, FCAP
Anna K. Wong, MD, FCAP
David L. Zwick, MD, FCAP
Maria A. Proytcheva, MD, FCAP, Liaison
3. 2013 CM-B
PARTICIPANT SUMMARY
Program Update
Don’t Miss Out on this Educational Opportunity!
With your participation in CAP’s Surveys programs, every member of your team can
take part in education activities: earn Continuing Education (CE) credits or receive
Self-Reported Training* at no additional charge.
This Survey mailing includes a Self-Reported Training activity. By reviewing the
discussion that begins on page 63, your laboratory staff can earn 0.25 education
hours that can be used towards fulfilling education and certification maintenance
requirements. For your convenience, a form has been included to document your
staff’s participation in the activity. See page 86.
*CAP Self-Reported Training activities do not offer CE credit, but can be used
towards fulfilling requirements for certification maintenance by agencies such as the
American Society of Clinical Pathology (ASCP). Please verify with your certifying
agency to determine your education requirements.
1
4. Evaluation Criteria
QUALITATIVE
For qualitative procedures in urinalysis, evaluation is based on participant consensus
by method and instrument. For each analyte, a minimum of two, but not more than four,
responses will be given a passing score. Analyte results graded “Good” performance
must have 80% participant consensus. Eighty percent participant consensus can be
determined by grouping the mode with the next one or two most frequent responses.
This group will be given “Good” performance. “Acceptable” performance will be given to
additional responses until a minimum of 90% of participant results are given a passing
score. In the case of a negative specimen, negative responses must constitute 90%
participant consensus. Specimens with results for one of more methods distributed
over both negative and positive responses (non-consensus) will not be evaluated.
Specimens for which there is greater than 90% of participant responses distributed
over more than four responses will be graded as “Non-consensus”.
Analyte
Bilirubin, Confirmatory
Gastric Occult Blood
Gastric pH
Nitrate
Occult Blood
Protein, Confirmatory
Urine hCG
QUANTITATIVE
Analyte
Gastric pH
Osmolality
Specific Gravity
Evaluation Criteria
80% overall participant consensus/intended response
80% overall participant consensus/intended response
80% overall participant consensus/intended response
80% overall participant consensus/intended response
80% overall participant consensus/intended response
80% overall participant consensus/intended response
80% overall participant consensus/intended response
Target Value
Peer Group Mean
Peer Group Mean
Peer Group Mean
Evaluation Criteria
3 SD
3 SD
2 SD or 0.010, whichever is greater
Low and high values shown in the Participant Summary indicate the range of values
reported.
Low and high limits of acceptability are shown on the evaluation report.
Data are not included for methods used by fewer than 10 laboratories.
PHOTOGRAPHS
Photographs are evaluated for CAP purposes according to 80% or greater consensus
of either referees or participant laboratories. "Good" performance is given for the
intended response. Additionally, the Hematology and Clinical Microscopy Resource
Committee may, at its discretion, grant either "good" or "acceptable" performance for
other equivalent responses.
To provide a timely evaluation of your results, statistics presented in this Participant
Summary reflect a minimum of 80% of participant enrollment. In the event a result is
not graded, a numeric code will appear next to your result. A definition of the code will
appear on the first page of the evaluation. Please see “Actions Laboratories Should
Take when a PT Result is Not Graded” on page 85.
2
65. Urine Sediment Photographs
CMP-17
Case History CMP-17 through CMP-20
This urine sample is from a 37-year-old man with advanced kidney disease, admitted through the emergency
room (ER) for lower abdominal discomfort and painful urination. Laboratory data include: specific gravity = 1.017,
pH = 5.0; blood, leukocyte esterase, protein, glucose, ketones, and nitrite = positive.
CMP Participants
No.
%
Identification
Granular cast
4393
96.8
Performance
Evaluation
Good
The arrowed object is a granular cast as correctly identified by 96.8% of the participants.
Urinary casts are cylindrical objects that form in the distal tubules and collecting ducts as a result of
solidification of protein within the renal tubular lumen. Casts are sub-classified based on their matrix
composition (hyaline, waxy), inclusions (granules, fat, hemosiderin), or cellular composition (white cells, red
cells, renal tubular epithelial cells, bacteria).
Granular casts as depicted in this image are a common finding in urine specimens. This cast is made up of
plasma proteins from degenerated cellular products and may have a fine or coarse granular appearance that
is often evenly dispersed throughout the cast. Most granular casts are not pathological; however, these casts
can be seen in urine from individuals with renal disease.
63
66. CMP-18
Urine Sediment Photographs
CMP Participants
No.
%
Identification
Erythrocyte, mature
4463
98.4
Performance
Evaluation
Good
The arrowed object is a red blood cell that is correctly identified by 98.4% of the participants. Red blood cells
in wet preparations appear as pale yellow-orange discs that are usually about 7 to 8 μm in diameter. The
appearance of red blood cells depends upon the age and condition of the urine specimen. Old hypotonic urine
specimens make red blood cells appear as “ghost-like,” faint, colorless circles. Red blood cells in hypertonic
urine samples can appear more crenated. Oil droplets can mimic red blood cells but the refractile nature of oil
droplets is a helpful distinction. Crenated red cells may be confused with white blood cells, which unlike red
blood cells have multilobated nuclei. Generally, only a small number of red blood cells are seen in urine (less
than 3/HPF); however, increased numbers of red blood cells can be associated with kidney disease,
inflammation, trauma, or bleeding disorders.
64
67. CMP-19
Urine Sediment Photographs
CMP Participants
Identification
Performance
No.
Evaluation
4377
Waxy Cast
%
96.5
Good
The arrowed image is a waxy cast which was correctly identified by 96.5% of the participants. Waxy casts are
usually broad and stubby with a homogenous smooth and dense appearance. The ends are often blunted
with well-defined parallel margins that may be serrated or notched which reflect its brittle nature. Waxy casts
are thought to arise from the degeneration of cellular casts and are frequently associated with severe or
progressive chronic renal disease. These waxy casts can be differentiated from hyaline casts due to their
highly refractile nature.
65
68. CMP-20
Urine Sediment Photographs
CMP Participants
No.
%
Identification
Calcium oxalate crystals
4533
99.9
Performance
Evaluation
Good
The arrowed objects are calcium oxalate crystals which were correctly identified by 99.9% of the participants.
Calcium oxalate crystals can have various forms. The classic form is the dihydrate form, as depicted in this
image, which appears as a colorless octahedron with the morphologic features of an envelope. The
monohydrate form has an oval, elliptical, or dumbbell shape. Large numbers of oxalate crystals can be seen
in chronic renal disease, ethylene glycol (antifreeze) toxicity, or in patients who consume foods rich in oxalic
acid (ie, tomatoes, apples, asparagus, oranges, or carbonated beverages). Calcium oxalate crystals can
cause renal calculi.
George Girgis, MT
Hematology and Clinical Microscopy Resource Committee
66
69. Body Fluid Photographs
Case History CMP-21 through CMP-26
The patient is a 38-year-old, immunocompromised man who presents with fever, shortness of breath, and
nonproductive cough. Bronchioalveolar lavage (BAL) is performed and shows: total nucleated cells = 6100/μL (6.1
× 10 /μL) and RBC = 400/μL (0.4 × 10 /μL).
Referees
No.
%
CMP-21
Identification
CMP Participants
No.
%
Performance
Evaluation
Monocyte/macrophage
3
33.3
1083
43.5
Non-consensus
Mesothelial cells
3
33.3
746
29.9
Non-consensus
Macrophage containing hemosiderin (Siderophage)
1
11.1
180
7.2
Non-consensus
Bronchial lining cell
1
11.1
156
6.3
Non-consensus
The arrowed cell represents a monocyte/macrophage, as was correctly identified by 43.5% of the participants.
Monocytes and macrophages represent a continuum on the mononuclear phagocytic series, with monocytes
typically referring to cells circulating in the blood, while macrophages represent more mature forms that have
undergone further differentiation after migration into tissues. Alveolar macrophages typically are the
predominant cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and have similar morphology to the macrophages seen in
other body fluids. They have an eccentric round nucleus and abundant blue-grey cytoplasm, with small
numbers of azurophilic granules, vacuoles, and may contain ingested material such as hemosiderin, RBCs or
nucleated cells, microorganisms, or lipid. Cytoplasmic black carbon particles can also be observed in alveolar
macrophages of smokers. Mature macrophages can sometimes be difficult to differentiate from mesothelial
cells in some types of specimens. An important clue here that the cell is a macrophage and not a mesothelial
cell is the specimen source, namely bronchoalveolar lavage. Mesothelial cells are lining cells of the peritoneal,
pericardial, and pleural cavities, whereas the lining cells of the bronchial tree have a distinctly different
appearance and are columnar and ciliated. When peritoneal, pericardial, and pleural fluids are being
examined, distinguishing features of mesothelial cells that may be helpful in differentiating from macrophages
include the biphasic cytoplasmic staining, with a lightly staining perinuclear area and a deeper blue periphery;
the more pronounced surface membrane projections; and the presence of “windows” between mesothelial
cells in clusters, which are clear spaces between individual cells.
67
70. CMP-22
Body Fluid Photographs
CMP Participants
No.
%
1653
Macrophage containing abundant small
lipid vacuoles/droplets (Lipophage)
Monocyte/macrophage
66.5
Educational
429
Identification
Performance
Evaluation
17.3
Educational
Neutrophil/macrophage with phagocytized
133
5.3
Educational
fungi
Macrophage containing hemosiderin
70
2.8
Educational
(Siderophage)
The arrowed cell represents a lipophage, as was correctly identified by 66.5% of the participants.
Identification as a monocyte/macrophage is also acceptable. A lipophage represents a macrophage
containing numerous cytoplasmic small fat droplets, which result from ingestion of extracellular lipids, such
as membranes from necrotic cells. Large numbers of lipophages can be observed in pleural fluid in the
presence of chylothorax, or in cerebrospinal fluid following intrathecal chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
68
71. CMP-23
Body Fluid Photographs
Identification
CMP Participants
No.
%
Erythrocyte, mature
2481
99.3
Performance
Evaluation
Good
The arrowed cell represents a mature erythrocyte, as was correctly identified by 99.3% of the participants.
The presence of red blood cells (RBCs) in body fluids frequently indicates hemorrhage or traumatic
contamination of the body fluid with peripheral blood. Their morphology in body fluids is similar to that
observed in the peripheral blood: non-nucleated, round, with a zone of central pallor, although they can also
appear crenated because of preservation artifact.
69
72. CMP-24
Body Fluid Photographs
Identification
CMP Participants
No.
%
Performance
Evaluation
Pneumocystis jirovecii
1821
73.4
Educational
167
6.7
Educational
Bacteria - extracellular
94
3.8
Educational
Macrophage containing hemosiderin (Siderophage)
73
2.9
Educational
Degenerating cell, NOS
67
2.7
Educational
Yeast/fungi, extracellular
47
1.9
Educational
Stain precipitate
The arrowed object represents Pneumocystis jirovecii, as correctly identified by 73.4% of the participants.
Pneumocystis jirovecii (formerly Pneumocystis carinii) is an opportunistic fungal pathogen classified within
phylum Ascomycota, which causes severe pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. The life cycle of the
organism goes through a trophic and cystic form. Pneumocystis organisms are usually found within foamy
amorphous material present within lung alveoli. Trophic forms can be visualized on Wright-Giemsa stained
preparations and are typically 1-5 µm, pleomorphic, and contain a single nucleus. The wall of pneumocystis
cyst forms does not stain on Wright-Giemsa, making this form more difficult to identify, although the presence
of cyst forms may give the amorphous material a “honeycomb”-like appearance. Distinguishing Pneumocystis
structures from artifact may be challenging and can be aided through the use of immunofluorescent
monoclonal antibodies for direct detection in clinical specimens.
70
73. CMP-25
Body Fluid Photographs
Identification
CMP Participants
No.
%
Lymphocyte
2464
98.6
Performance
Evaluation
Good
The arrowed cell represents a lymphocyte, as was correctly identified by 98.6% of the participants. Mature
lymphocytes have round to oval nuclei with condensed chromatin and without visible nucleoli. The cytoplasm
is typically scant, agranular, and basophilic. In body fluid specimens, particularly cerebrospinal fluid,
centrifugation artifact can make mature lymphocytes appear to be larger than their counterparts in peripheral
blood and to have visible nucleoli and more abundant cytoplasm. Care should be taken to distinguish such
cytospin artifact from evidence of a hematolymphoid neoplasm. To the right of the lymphocyte, Pneumocystis
jirovecii organisms are seen, including small trophic forms containing a single small nucleus, as well as
several round lighter staining areas, representing cyst forms.
71
74. CMP-26
Body Fluid Photographs
CMP Participants
No.
%
Identification
Neutrophil, segmented or band
2463
98.6
Performance
Evaluation
Good
The arrowed cell represents a neutrophil, as was correctly identified by 98.6% of the participants. Neutrophils
are the most mature forms of the myeloid series with condensed nuclear chromatin and pale pink cytoplasm
containing specific bluish granules. The nucleus is typically segmented with 3-5 distinct lobes connected by
thin filaments. In the setting of infections, neutrophils can contain vacuoles, toxic granulation, Döhle bodies,
or ingested microorganisms. In body fluid specimens, cellular degeneration may result in nuclear pyknosis
and fragmentation. In some cases, pyknotic neutrophils may resemble nucleated red blood cells but can be
correctly identified by the characteristics of the cytoplasm, which is more eosinophilic than that of nRBCs and
may contain residual specific granules. Also of note is the Pneumocystis jirovecii present in the center of this
image.
72
75. Case Discussion: Pneumocystis in BAL
This case illustrates an example of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in an immunocompromised patient, with
evidence of Pneumocystis organisms in a bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimen. Pneumocystis pneumonia
(PCP) can occur in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and CD4 T-lymphocyte counts
<200/µL, where it is considered an acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining illness. PCP also can
be seen in patients whose immune system is compromised by malignancies, chemotherapy, stem cell or solid
organ transplantation, glucocorticoid use, particularly for rheumatologic conditions, or primary immune
deficiencies. Because of the severity of Pneumocystis-associated disease, prompt treatment is required and
prophylactic therapy is usually initiated in patients with low CD4 counts.
Pneumocystis is classified in the fungal kingdom (phylum Ascomycota) based on gene sequence similarities with
fungi, particularly in ribosomal RNA genes. Pneumocystis jirovecii refers to the human-specific form of the
organism, which highlights the fact that unique Pneumocystis forms have been identified in various mammalian
species with stringent host specificities. Pneumocystis is an obligate extracellular organism with a complex life
cycle that involves sexual and asexual reproduction and two morphologic forms: trophic, which are usually
haploid; and cystic, which can have 2-8 nuclei depending on the stage of development. Studying the genetics and
life cycle of this pathogen has been challenged by inability to culture it ex vivo, ie, outside the host lung, although
more recently advanced molecular and genomic techniques have been applied to elucidate its biology. According
to the current understanding of PCP, acquisition of Pneumocystis occurs via the airborne route and person-toperson transmission. It is thought that immunocompetent individuals undergo asymptomatic infections and can
therefore serve as a temporary reservoir for the organism.
The clinical presentation of PCP differs between HIV-infected and non-HIV patients. In the context of HIV, PCP
typically develops gradually, with low-grade fevers, progressive dyspnea, fatigue, and cough that is usually
nonproductive and less commonly productive of clear sputum. In non-HIV patients, fulminant respiratory failure is
common, requiring ventilatory support. Radiographic findings are similar in the two patient populations and
characterized by bilateral diffuse interstitial infiltrates. High-resolution computed tomography (CT) findings of
patchy or nodular ground-glass opacities are suggestive of PCP although not diagnostic. Given the relatively
nonspecific clinical presentation and radiographic findings, the diagnosis of PCP depends largely on the
laboratory identification of Pneumocystis, although that is somewhat limited by the inability to culture the
organism.
Microscopic identification of P. jirovecii is typically performed on BAL specimens obtained with bronchoscopy.
While induced sputum can also be used and is less invasive, it is considered suboptimal due to decreased
sensitivity and specificity compared to BAL, especially for patients receiving PCP prophylaxis. Lung biopsy tissue
is also an appropriate diagnostic specimen, however, it is associated with high cost and invasiveness and is
infrequently used. Various histochemical stains can be employed to detect P. jirovecii, but many of these
conventional stains may be unable to simultaneously detect trophic and cystic forms. A recent study directly
comparing four different staining techniques found that Grocott-Gomori methenamine silver stain (GMS) and
Calcofluor white fungal stain (CW) have superior sensitivity compared to Diff-Quik staining (~ 75% vs. ~ 50%,
respectively). In contrast, immunofluorescent monoclonal antibody staining can detect both life forms, providing
the highest sensitivity of all microscopic techniques (> 90%), although it tends to be more costly, time consuming,
and may be associated with a small decrease in specificity (~ 95% vs. >99% for the 3 conventional staining
methods).
Other methods have been developed recently for PCP diagnosis in order to increase the sensitivity of P. jirovecii
detection and/or avoid the invasiveness of bronchoscopy. Various methods employing polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) have been described and shown to have improved sensitivity compared to microscopy (94-100%
73
76. depending on the genomic target). The disadvantage of such assays is that they may also detect P. jirovecii DNA
in patients who are colonized by P. jirovecii but do not have associated pneumonia, which may lead to
unnecessary treatment. Efforts have also been made to detect markers of P. jirovecii infection in serum, the most
promising of which is β-D-Glucan (BDG) and may offer a noninvasive alternative to BAL. Although assays
detecting serum β-D-Glucan have been shown to perform well in HIV-infected patients, the characteristics of such
assays need to be further evaluated in different patient populations, particularly in the context of therapy.
Martina Lefterova, MD, PhD
Joan E. Etzell, MD, FCAP
Hematology and Clinical Microscopy Resource Committee
References:
1. Krajicek BJ, Limper AH, Thomas CF Jr. Advances in the biology, pathogenesis and identification of
Pneumocystis pneumonia. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2008;14:228-234.
2. Procop GW, Haddad S, Quinn J, et al. Detection of Pneumocystis jiroveci in respiratory specimens by four
staining methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:3333-3335.
3. Thomas CF Jr., Limper AH. Current insights into the biology and pathogenesis of Pneumocystis pneumonia.
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:298-308.
4. Tietjen PA. Clinical presentation and diagnosis of Pneumocystis infection in HIV-infected patients. In: Basow
DS, ed. UpToDate. Waltham, MA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2011. http://www.uptodate.com/contents/clinicalpresentation-and-diagnosis-of-pneumocystis-infection-in-hiv-infected-patients. Accessed January 9, 2013.
74