FMP Evaluation

14 de Jun de 2019
FMP Evaluation
FMP Evaluation
FMP Evaluation
FMP Evaluation
FMP Evaluation
FMP Evaluation
FMP Evaluation
FMP Evaluation
FMP Evaluation
FMP Evaluation
FMP Evaluation
FMP Evaluation
FMP Evaluation
FMP Evaluation
1 de 14

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Evaluation q4 2Evaluation q4 2
Evaluation q4 2mcjbird
Fmp - proposalFmp - proposal
Fmp - proposalTigs0102
Idea development pro forma-2Idea development pro forma-2
Idea development pro forma-2Amelia Browne
7. evaluation7. evaluation
7. evaluationamy foster
Audience feedback.Audience feedback.
Audience feedback.lewisryan37
7. evaluation 17. evaluation 1
7. evaluation 1kallum-sykes

Similar a FMP Evaluation

7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluationSydney Wratten
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluationkallum-sykes
5. evaluation .15. evaluation .1
5. evaluation .1carter smith
7. fmp evaluation7. fmp evaluation
7. fmp evaluationjoshpalmmer
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluationkallum-sykes
5. evaluation .15. evaluation .1
5. evaluation .1carter smith

Mais de kallum-sykes

Fanzine Text 2nd DraftFanzine Text 2nd Draft
Fanzine Text 2nd Draftkallum-sykes
Fanzine Text 1st DraftFanzine Text 1st Draft
Fanzine Text 1st Draftkallum-sykes
2nd year preparation2nd year preparation
2nd year preparationkallum-sykes
UAL UCAS Pro FormaUAL UCAS Pro Forma
UAL UCAS Pro Formakallum-sykes
Production reflectionProduction reflection
Production reflectionkallum-sykes
ProposalProposal
Proposalkallum-sykes

Último

HO CHI MINH CITY ECONOMIC FORUM  HEF 2023 ENG FINAL - v1.pdfHO CHI MINH CITY ECONOMIC FORUM  HEF 2023 ENG FINAL - v1.pdf
HO CHI MINH CITY ECONOMIC FORUM HEF 2023 ENG FINAL - v1.pdfChuong Nguyen
TDDS.pptxTDDS.pptx
TDDS.pptxSuvarna ( Neha) sachin Chittam (kajale)
9.19.23 Civics, Majoritarianism, and Democracy.pptx9.19.23 Civics, Majoritarianism, and Democracy.pptx
9.19.23 Civics, Majoritarianism, and Democracy.pptxMaryPotorti1
NETWORK LAYER.pptNETWORK LAYER.ppt
NETWORK LAYER.pptDrTThendralCompSci
Structured Query Language (SQL) _ Edu4Sure Training.pptxStructured Query Language (SQL) _ Edu4Sure Training.pptx
Structured Query Language (SQL) _ Edu4Sure Training.pptxEdu4Sure
Post-Test Tutorial Unlimited Attempts.pdfPost-Test Tutorial Unlimited Attempts.pdf
Post-Test Tutorial Unlimited Attempts.pdfMarlene Maheu

Último(20)

FMP Evaluation

Notas do Editor

  1. What were the strengths of your research? How did your research help your product? What were the weaknesses of your research? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  2. What were the strengths of your planning? How did your planning help your product? What were the weaknesses of your planning? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  3. Did you manage your time well? Did you complete your project on time or would your products have improved with additional time? What would you have done if you had more time to produce your work?
  4. Compare your work to similar existing products and discuss the similarities and differences Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page alongside an existing product Use text boxes and arrows
  5. Does your work look good? Was it creative? What aspects of your game’s visuals do you like? What would you improve? How would you improve it? Discuss the strengths and weaknesses Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page and analyse them Use text boxes and arrows
  6. How have you appealed to your target audience? What specific bits of content would appeal to your target audience. Refer to your findings from your questionnaire. Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page and analyse them Use text boxes and arrows
  7. What changes would you make to your product based upon your peer feedback and why?