Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Oregon EV Roadmap Looks at Driving Patterns
1. EV Roadmap
Oregon Drivers – how far and where do they drive?
Willamette Valley & Puget Sound Corridor
Breakout Group 10
Portland, Oregon USA
November 9, 2009
John Thornton
john@CleanFuture.us
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
2. Agenda:
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor
• Background data
– How far?
– Where?
• Assignments:
1) Placement Plan
2) Process
3) Policy
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
3. Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor
• Purpose:
– Start framing decision about placement and
generate issues, questions and
opportunities that need to be addressed
going forward:
• Connections
– Oregon (Willamette Valley)
– Oregon + Vancouver, WA
– Oregon + Washington
» Willamette Valley to Puget Sound
– Oregon + Washington + Vancouver B.C.
• Level III charging assignments
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
4. Definitions
• EVSE
– Electric Vehicle Service Equipment
• Charging
– Level I - overnight
– Level II - 4 to 8 hours
– Level III - 15 - 30 minutes
• Transportation Electrification
– Electric Vehicle Technology Types
• Many acronyms, all with similar meanings……
– “alphabet soup”
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
5. Technology Transformation
Hybrid EV
(HEV) PHEV
Tiny
Explosions NEV
inside xEV PEV
engine GEV
FCEV
etc., etc.
Internal
Combustion
Electric
Engine
(ICE)
Dirty Clean
“Old” technology Transformation “New” technology
Inefficient Efficient
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
6. How far do people drive?
Distribution of Commute Distances to Metropolitan Areas
Bend
Eugene
0.06 Corvallis
Portland
Medford
Salem
Probability Density
0.04
0.02
0.00
0 20 40 60 80 Miles
Miles
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
7. Where do people drive?
• Commutes within
• Commutes in (destinations)
• Commutes out (origins)
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
8. Where do people drive?
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000 Outflow
300,000 Inflow
Within
200,000
100,000
-
Eugene…
Corvallis…
Monmouth…
Salem…
Albany
Silverton
Vancouver
Dallas
McMinnville
Veneta
Sandy
Metro
Canby
RVMPO
BMPO
Scappose
Lebanon
Redmond
Stayton
GrantsPass
Newberg
Woodburn
CottageGrove
Workers by place of residence / place of work (2000 Census)
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
9. Where do people drive?
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000 Outflow
300,000 Inflow
Within
200,000
100,000
-
Eugene…
Corvallis…
Monmouth…
Salem…
Albany
Silverton
Vancouver
Dallas
McMinnville
Veneta
Sandy
Metro
Canby
RVMPO
BMPO
Scappose
Lebanon
Redmond
Stayton
GrantsPass
Newberg
Woodburn
CottageGrove
Workers by place of residence / place of work (2000 Census)
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
10. Portland – Commutes In
(Destination)
Corvallis 0.6%
Eugene/Springfield
0%
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
11. Portland – Commutes Out
(Origin)
Woodburn 2.2%
Corvallis
.3%
Eugene/Springfield
0%
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
12. Salem / Keizer – Commutes Out
(Origin)
Vancouve
r
Portland
Metro
Woodburn
12%
Salem /
Keizer
Other
Dallas 5% Silverton 6%
Albany 4%
Corvallis
3%
Eugene / 2.6
Springfield %
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
13. Salem / Keizer – Commutes In
(Destination)
Vancouve
r
Portland Metro 12%
Woodburn
3.8%
Salem /
Other 47%
Keizer
Dallas 8% Silverton 4.8%
Monmouth
Stayton 4.2%
8%
Albany 4.7%
Corvallis Lebanon 0.9%
2%
Eugene / 1.7
Springfield %
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
14. Corvallis / Albany – Commutes In
(Destination)
Vancouve
r
Portland Metro 0.6%
Woodburn
Salem / Keizer
4% Dallas 1%
Monmouth
Other 8%
45%
Albany 36.5%
Corvallis Lebanon 6.3%
Eugene / 2.5
Springfield %
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
15. Corvallis / Albany – Commutes Out
(Origin)
Vancouve
r
Portland Metro
8%
Woodburn
Salem / Keizer 0.3%
15%
Dallas 1%
Albany
Corvallis Other
Eugene / 8%
Springfield
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
16. Eugene / Springfield – Commutes Out
(Origin)
Vancouve
r
Portland Metro
Woodburn
Salem / Keizer
5%
Albany 2.4%
Corvallis 4.8%
Eugene / Other
Springfield
Cottage Grove 8%
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
17. Eugene / Springfield – Commutes In
(Destination)
Vancouve
r
Portland Metro
Woodburn
Salem / Keizer
1.2%
Albany 1.3%
Corvallis 1.1%
Eugene /
Other 76.8%
Springfield
Veneta 7.6%
Cottage Grove
11.5%
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
18. Acknowledgements
• Source data:
Tabulation of Workers by Place of Residence and
Place of Work from Year 2000 Census
– Courtesy of Brian Gregor, ODOT
• Mapping
– Cody Meyer, PSU
• Analysis
– Cody Meyer, PSU
– John Thornton, CleanFuture
• Follow-up questions
– john@CleanFuture.us
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
19. Work Assignment for Break Out Group 10
• General Framing… not perfect decisions!
• Assignments:
1) Placement Plan
Hypothetical placement plan to assign:
40 Level 2 chargers
50 Level 3 chargers (fast chargers)
2) Process
a) Regional coordination in Willamette Valley
b) Cooperation / collaboration with Puget Sound area /
Washington state.
3) Policy
Group discussion / recommendation
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
20. Placement Plan
• Allocation / Assignment
– 40 Level II Charging Stations
– 50 Level III (Fast) Charging Stations
• Exercise – Where and how should these
be placed to connect each region?
– Portland Metropolitan area
– Salem / Keizer
– Corvallis / Albany
– Eugene / Springfield
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
21. Process (1 of 2)
• Should Oregon reach out to our neighbors
in Washington and propose the joint
design and deployment of a network of
Level-2 and Level-3 charging stations that
will extend and integrate the corridor from
Eugene all the way to Seattle, linking the
urban regions along the way, including
Vancouver, Centralia, Olympia, Tacoma,
and Seattle?
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
22. Process (2 of 2)
• Is this a good or bad idea?
• Should we think even bigger and
bring our friends from Vancouver,
B.C. into the plan? How soon?
• What recommendation would you
make to the rest of the E.V. Road
Map participants?
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
23. Policy
Select 3 tasks to discuss as a group:
• TASK ONE
– What marketing initiatives are needed in 2010 to attract infrastructure “hosts”
and customers?
• TASK TWO
– What will the E.V. service station of the future look like?
• TASK THREE
– What should be our region’s pricing policy for publicly-accessible charging
infrastructure within and across metropolitan regions in Oregon (and across
electric utility service areas)?
• TASK FOUR
– What is the business model and usage policy for charging infrastructure. How
much should users be charged?
– How will revenue be split between a city, utility, and a service provider?
• TASK FIVE
– What should be our region’s plan and policy for deploying charging infrastructure
at places of employment?
– Who is responsible for this activity?
• TASK SIX
– What criteria should be used for siting charging infrastructure?
• What are the goals / metrics?
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10
24. Conclusions / Next Steps
• Summary
• Report out
• Follow-up Interest / Participation
Willamette Valley / Puget Sound Corridor – Breakout Group 10