The Indian Dental Academy is the Leader in continuing dental education , training dentists in all aspects of dentistry and offering a wide range of dental certified courses in different formats.
Indian dental academy provides dental crown & Bridge,rotary endodontics,fixed orthodontics,
Dental implants courses.for details pls visit www.indiandentalacademy.com ,or call
00919248678078
2. INDIAN DENTAL ACADEMY
Leader in continuing dental education
www.indiandentalacademy.com
www.indiandentalacademy.com
3. SURGICAL ANATOMY
Superior and Posterior view
Mandible showing relationship Of Body and
ramus
Section Of mandible at sysmphysis showing maximum
thickness at lower border
Section Of mandible
www.indiandentalacademy.comdistal to last molar
showing maximum thickness at Upper
border
4. Internal Architecture of bone : 1; Osteone, 2;Cortical and
Medullary bone, 3; A long Bone, 4; Loaded cylinder
Trajectories of Mandible
Joint Adaption for pressure bearing
www.indiandentalacademy.com
5. BLOOD SUPPLY AND NERVE SUPPLY OF MANDIBLE
Inferior Alveolar Artery
Lateral View Of mandible
Inferior Alveolar neurovascular
Bundle, Sphenomandibular ligament
and mandibular foreman
www.indiandentalacademy.com
6. CHANGES ASSOCIATED WITH AGE TO MANDIBULAR BLOOD SUPPLY
Cross section of mandibe of
87 yrs old male
Left carotid angiogram of 69
yrs old female showing
emply inferior dental canal
Right Carotid angiogram of a
28 yrs old female showing
normal Inferior dental artery
Cross section of mandibe of
16 yrs old male
www.indiandentalacademy.com
7. AVERAGE MEASUREMENTS IN THE BODY OF THE MANDIBLE
P1
P2
M1
M2
M3
Distance between nerve and Lower
border of mandible (a)
8.6
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.5
Distance between nerve and inner
cortex (b)
3.2
3.2
2.0
2.9
3.0
Distance between nerve and buccal
cortex (c)
4.0
4.0
5.4
5.9
4.6
Position of section
I1
I2
C
Average Thickness of outer cortex
(d)
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.7
3.1
3.2
3.4
Distance between root apices and
outer cortex (e)
3.7
4.0
3.2
3.6
3.8
4.7
5.7
6.3
8.8
8.3
6.8
6.0
Distance between root apices and
outer cortex (f)
www.indiandentalacademy.com
8. THE STRENGTH OF MANDIBLE
“The bone fracture at the site of tensile strength since its resistance to compressive strength is more”
- Hodgson ( 1967)
Distribution of strain lines as a result of
force applied over the symphysis menti
or mental foramen
www.indiandentalacademy.com
9. THE DISPOSITION OF MANDIBULAR FRACTURE LINES
1.
Condylar region
Extracapsular And Intracapsular fracture of condyle
The relationship between the muscle attachments and
site of condylar fracture
www.indiandentalacademy.com
10. 2.
•
RAMUS AND CORONOID PROCESS
Fractures of the ramus exhibit very little displacement of the fragments as a result of being, to a
large extent, splinted by the presence of masseter muscle on the lateral aspect and the medial
pterygoid on the medial aspect.
• there is usually onlt minimal displacement of the coronoid process, since the fragment is
splinted by the tendinous insertion of the temporalis muscle.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
11. 3.
ANGLE OF THE MANDIBLE
Disposition of fracture lines at the angle
Thickness of cortex at the angle of mandibel in
the presence and absence of teeth
Change of angulation at
angle
www.indiandentalacademy.com
12. Vertically favourable fracture line
Vertically unfavourable fracture line
Horizontally favourable & unfavourable
fracture line
www.indiandentalacademy.com
13. FACTORS INFLUENCING DISPLACEMENT OF FRACTURE
1. Direction and intensity of the traumatic force
2. Site of fracture
3. Direction of fracture line
4. muscle pull exerted on fractured fragments.
5. Presence or absence of teeth.
6. Extent of soft tissue wound.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
14. HISTORY
Writings on mandible fractures appared as early as 1650 BC, when Egyptian described the examination, diagnosis and
treatment of mandible fractures.
Hippocrates described direct reapproximation of the fracture segments with the use of circumdental wiring.
1795, Chopart and Desault were the first to use dental prosthetic devices in an attempt to immobilize fracture segments
Chopart and Desault
John Barton described his Barton Bandage in order to immbilize and stabilize fracture fragment
www.indiandentalacademy.com
15. 1886, Thomas Brain Gunning was the first person to use a custom fitted intraoral dental splint for immobilization. He
used the splint in conjunction with an external head appliance.
Glimer credited with being the first to use method of intermaxillary fixation.
In 1881, Glimer described a method of mandibular fracture fixation that used two heavy rods placed on either side of the
fracture and wired together.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
16. ETIOLOGY OF MANDIBULAR FRACTURE
1. Vehicular accident – 43%
2. Altercation, assault, interpersonal vilonce – 34%
3. Fall – 7%
4. Sporting accidents – 4%
5. Industrial mishaps or work accidents – 10%
6. Pathological fractures – 2%
www.indiandentalacademy.com
18. CLASSIFICATION OF MANDIBULAR FRACTURE
1.
Kruger's general classification
• Simple or Closed Fracture
• Compound or Open
• Comminuted
• Complicated or complex
• Impacted
Simple fracture
Compound Fracture
• Greenstick fracture
• Pathological
Comminuted fracture
www.indiandentalacademy.com Greenstick fracture
Impacted fracture
19. 2.
Rowe & Killey classification
• Fractures not involving basal bone
• Fractures involving basal bone of the mandible. Subdivided into following:
Single Unilateral
Double unilateral
Bilateral
Multiple
3.
Dingman & Natvig classification
• Midline
• Parasymphyseal
• Symphysis
• Body
• Angle
• Ramus
• Condylar process
• Coronoid process
• Alveolar process
www.indiandentalacademy.com
20. 4.
I.
Kruger & Schilli classification
Relation to the external environment
•
Simple Or closed
•
II.
Compound or open
Types of fracture
•
•
Greenstick
•
III.
Incomplete
Complete
•
Comminuted
Dentition of the jaw with reference to the use of splint
•
•
Edentulous or insufficiently dentulous patient
•
IV.
Sufficiently dentulous patient
Primary and Mixed dentition
Localization
•
Fractures of the symphysis region between canines
•
Fractures of the canine region
•
Fractures of the body of the mandible
•
Fractures of the angle
•
Fractures of the mandibular ramus
•
Fractures of the coronoid process
Fractures of the condyle www.indiandentalacademy.com
•
21. 5.
Kazanjian classification
Class – I : teeth are present on both sides of the fracture line
Class – II : Teeth are present on only one side of fracture line
Class – III : Patient is
edentulolus
www.indiandentalacademy.com
22. DIAGNOSIS OF MANDIBULAR FRACTURE
History
Clinical Examination
Change in occlusion
Anesthesia, Paresthesia or Dysesthesia of lower lip
Abnormal mandibular movements
Change in facial contour and mandibular arch form
Laceration, Hematoma and Ecchymosis
Loose teeth and crepitation on palpation
Radiological Examination
Panoramic radiograph
Lateral oblique Radiograph
Posteroanterior Radiograph
Occlusal view
reverse towne’s view
CT scan
www.indiandentalacademy.com
23. GENERAL PRINCIPLE IN THE TREATMENT OF MANDIBULAR FRACTURE
1.
The patient’s general physical status should be carefully evaluated and monitored prior to any
consideration of treating mandibular fracture.
2.
Diagnosis and treatment of mandibular fractures should be approached methodically not with an
“emergency-type” mentality
3.
Dental injuries should be evaluated and treated concurrently with treatment of mandibular fractures
4.
Re-establishment of occlusion is the primary goal in the treatment of mandibular fracture.
5.
With multiple facial fracture mandibular fracture should be treated first.
6.
Intermaxillary fixation time should vary according to the type, location, number severity of the
mandibular fracture as well as the patient’s age and health.
7.
Prophylactic antibiotics should be used for compound fractures.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
24. PROTOCOL FOR TREATMENT OF MANDIBULAR FRACTURES
Philip L. Maloney,J Oral Maxillofac Surg,59:879-884, 2001
• Simple fractures of the condylar process and ramus are usually treated by closed reduction. Patients are
placed in maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) for 48 to72 hours, followed by training elastics and close
observation to ensure that a malocclusion does not occur.
• No MMF is required for coronoid fractures; archbars and training elastics are used only if a malocclusion is
present.
• Simple or compound fractures with a time delay from injury to immobilization of less than 72 hours are
treated by a closed reduction (CR) or, if indicated, open reduction with rigid fixation (ORIF).
• Compound fractures where there is a delay from injury to immobilization of more than 72 hours are treated
with MMF and intravenous antibiotics for a period roughly equal to the time from injury to initialtreatment
(eg, a patient with a 5-day-old compound fracture receives intravenous antibiotics for 5 days). If the closed
reduction is adequate, the patient is continued on oral antibiotics for an additional 10 to 14days and
maintained in MMF and on a blenderized diet for 5 to 6 weeks from the time of closed reduction. If not,
ORIF is performed, and MMF is maintained for 10 to 14 additional days.
• Edentulous patients are treated with rigid fixation, no MMF, and a blenderized diet for 4 to 5 weeks.
• Teeth in the line of fracture are judged individually. If sound, firm, and the supportive tissues are intact,
they are retained except if an open reduction is to be performed; then, partially erupted and impacted third
molars in the line of fracture are removed.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
25. INDICATIONS FOR CLOSED REDUCTION
1.
Non-displaced favorable fractures
2.
Grossly comminuted fractures
3.
Fractures exposed by significant loss of overlying soft tissue.
4.
Mandibular fractures in children with developing dentition
5.
Coronoid process fracture
6.
Condylar fractures
www.indiandentalacademy.com
26. INDICATIONS FOR OPEN REDUCTION
1.
Displaced unfavorable fracture through angle of the mandible
2.
Displaced unfavorable fractures of the body or pasymphyseal region
3.
Multiple fractures of the facial bones
4.
Midface fractures and displaced Bilateral condyler fractures
5.
Fractures of the edentulous mandible with severe displacement of fragments
6.
Edentulous maxilla opposing a mandibular fracture
7.
Delay of treatment and interposition of soft tissue between noncontacting displaced fracture
fragments.
8.
Malunion
9.
Special systemic conditions contraindicating intermaxillaryfixation
www.indiandentalacademy.com
27. METHODS OF IMMOBILIZATION
(a) Osteosynthesis
without intermaxillary fixation
(i) Non-compression small plates
(ii) Compression plates
(iii) Mini-plates
(iv) Lag screws
(b) Intermaxillary fixation
(i) Bonded brackets
(ii) Dental wiring
Direct
Eyelet
(iii) Arch bars
(iv) Cap splints
(c) Intermaxillary fixation with osteosynthesis
(i) Transosseous wiring
(ii) Circumferential wiring
(iii) External pin fixation
(iv) Bone clamps
(v) Transfixation with Kirschner wires
www.indiandentalacademy.com
28. A GUIDELINE FOR TIME OF IMMOBILIZATION FOR FRACTURES OF TOOTH-BEARING
AREA OF THE LOWER JAW
- Peter bank (1991)
Young Adult
With
Fracture of the body of the mandible
Receiving
3 weeks
Early treatment
In which
Tooth removed from fracture line
If :
a.
Tooth retained in fracture line : add 1 week
b.
Fracture at the symphysis : add 1 week
c.
Age 40 years or above : add 1 or 2 weeks
d.
Children and Adolescents : Subtract 1 week
www.indiandentalacademy.com