Anúncio

SULFIDE MINERALIZATION IN EGYPT

Professor of Economic geology em Geology Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University
24 de Oct de 2016
Anúncio

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Apresentações para você(20)

Destaque(20)

Anúncio

Similar a SULFIDE MINERALIZATION IN EGYPT (20)

Mais de Geology Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University(20)

Anúncio

SULFIDE MINERALIZATION IN EGYPT

  1. Lecture 6: Hassan Z. Harraz hharraz2006@yahoo.com 2016- 2017 @ Hassan Harraz 2017
  2. Sulfide mineralization are the main resource for exploiting Pb, Zn, and Cu metals in Egypt. Sulfide mineralization is represented by four sulfide types of the different setting, lithology and ages, namely: i) Lead-Zinc sulphide Deposits ii) Cu-NiCo sulphide Deposits This type of mineralization is well represented in Abu Swayel in South Eastern Desert. The ore is closely related to mafic-ultramafic and gabbro of ophiolitic rocks. iii) Cu-Ni sulphide deposits This type of mineralization occurs in layered mafic-ultramafic intrusions like gabbro Akarem and El Geneina . iv) Stratiform Massive Sulphide (Zn-Cu-Pb) Deposits This type of mineralization is represented by a group of small lenses associated with talc deposits in South Eastern Desert at: Um Samuki, Helgit, Maakal, Atshan, Darhib, Abu Gurdi, and Egat. 2
  3. i) Hassan Z. Harraz hharraz2006@yahoo.com 2016- 2017
  4. Outline of Lecture 6: Distribution of Miocene zinc-lead deposits in Egypt. Host Rocks Ore form Mineralogy Classification Origin Um Gheig Zn-Pb Abu Ghorban 4
  5. This group of deposits, restricted to a certain stratigraphic horizon, occurring with the Phanerozoic sedimentary cover. Seven Middle Miocene zinc-lead occurrences are known in the Eastern Desert between the Quseir and Ras Banas towns at the Red Sea coastal:- Zug El Bohar, Essel, Wizr, Um Gheig, Abu Ghorban, Abu Anz, Gabal El Rusas and Ranga. Distribution of Miocene zinc-Lead deposits in Egypt. Distribution of Miocene Zinc-lead deposits in Egypt Gebel El-Zeit area was a source for the Galena, Lead and other minerals during the Old and Neo Kingdoms periods. The old mines and the ancient settlements at Gebel El-Zeit represents a special kinds of archaeological sites. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. Landsat ETM+ (bands 2, 4 and 7) image and geological map after Aref and Amstutz (1983) of wadi Um Gheig. 8
  9. Host Rocks Zinc-Lead occurs in the middle and upper parts of the mineralized limegrit and is embedded as stratiform to stratabound in limegrit and sandstone and/or secondary Fe, Pb and Zn oxide, carbonate or silicate minerals. Zn-Pb sulphide minerals also replaced and/or filling limegrit and conglomeratic limegrit of the Abu Dabbab Formation. A relatively, high Zn-Cu-Pb sulphide minerals replaced the stromatolitic and nodular dolomites facies of the Abu Dabbab Formation. Middle Miocene Limegrit, sandstone, conglomeratic limegrit, marl and dolomite Age: Abu Dabbab Formation. 9
  10. Fig.2: Geologic Map of the Zinc-Lead occurrences along the Red Sea coastal zone, Egypt. 10
  11. Ore form 1) Mineralization occurs in is in the lower part of Gabal El Rusas Formation , which rests unconformably on the peneplaned Basement rocks in Zug El Bohar and Essel areas. 2) In other occurrences the mineralization is associated with the upper Abu Dabbab Formation and may extend into younger sediments. 3) A prevailing sebkha environment during the deposition of the Abu Dabbab Formation is apparent, which contributed to the deposition of zinc and lead sulfide minerals. 4) A relatively, high Zn-Cu-Pb concentrations are recognized in the stromatolitic and nodular dolomites of the Abu Dabbab Formation south of Mersa Alam on the Red Sea coast. 5) The highest contents of Zn (up to 3400 ppm), Pb (up to 1270 ppm), and Mo (up to 200 ppm) are recorded in the rocks of the fault zone. High content of both Pb and Mo is recorded in the overburden located nearby the fault zone as well. 6) Moreover, these ore minerals and element distribution favour that, this oxidized mineralized zone represents an upper zone of a deposit. Its lower zone chiefly sphalerite can be expected at deeper level. 7) The ore is best developed, the thickness of the mineralized zone is ~50 m and extend in a NNW-SSE for ~200 m. Galena occurs in the middle and upper parts of the mineralized limegrit and shows massive, lenticular, cockade and network textures and is embedded in limegrit and/or secondary Fe, Pb and Zn oxide, carbonate or silicate minerals. 11
  12.  On the basis of detailed work on Um Gheig, Essel, and Zug El Bohar areas, El Aref and Amstutz (1983) classified the mineralization into two groups: a) Zn-Pb deposits of filling type: occurring in the Abu Dabbab Formation and represented by Um Gheig, Ranga and Wizr, occurrences. b) Stratiform to stratabound galena in sandstone : confined to the lower beds of the Gabal El Rusas formation and represented by Zug El Bohar and Essel occurrences.  The ore is restricted on the filling mass extend along the rift taking NW- SE rift fault apparently affiliated to an intercontinental rift zone (Mitchell and Garson, 1981), and not necessarily related to magmatism during rifting. 12
  13. Mineralogy The primary composed of sulfides whereas secondary composed of carbonates and oxides. Primary sulfide minerals include:- Sphalerite, Galena , Pyrite and Marcasite. On surface exposures, these are extensively altered (i.e., non-sulfide Minerals) into:- Cerussite, Anglesite, Smithonite, Hemimorphite, Hydrozincite, Jarosite, Wulfenite and Limonite. • The sulphide and iron-sulphide mineralizations are relatively enriched in depth as revealed from drilling investigations. Textures: Massive, lenticular, cockade and network 13
  14. Origin There are different theories of the origin of lead and zinc. Many opinions have been expressed the origin of these zinc-lead deposits:-  Most of the previous studies consider the lead-zinc deposits along the Red sea coast to be of hydrothermal origin.  Hassaan (1990), verified the hydrothermal origin of the lead zinc sulphide mineralization in the Red Sea coastal zone based on their mode of occurrence, the litho-structural controlling factors in its present position, the conspicuous wall rock alteration, the associated elements and the vertical and lateral local zoning controlling Pb, Zn and Fe distribution. In this respect, the ore deposits are pitches and flats, gash veins and disseminations and are not bedded .  A syn-sedimentary origin (Kochin and others, 1968; El Ramly et al., 1970),  A sedimentary-hydrothermal genesis of lead and zinc ore (Buschendorf, 1959).  An exhalative sedimentary origin (Hilmy et al., 1972)  A genesis through replacement of 'limegrit' and 'conglomeratic limegrit' by hydrothermal solutions has been agreed upon by many authors (Amin, 1955, El Shazly et al., 1956, Sabet et al., 1976).  The mineralization took place in near-surface conditions of medium to low pressure at a temperature between 90 and 150oC as 'telethermal to lepto-thermal' deposits during pre-Upper Miocene and Policene time (Soliman and Hassan, 1969) . 14
  15. Um Gheig Zn-Pb Mine • The area of Um Gheig mine is a part of the coastal plain of the Red Sea Coast, Egypt. • It lies 55 km south of Quseir City (Fig.1). • The area can be reached by Quseir-Mersa Alam asphalet road. The Um Gheig mine is located in Wadi Um Gheig, 7.5 km from the Red Sea Coast (Fig. 1). Host rock: Middle Miocene strata: Main host rocks are limegrit, conglomeritic limegrit, gypsum and clayey limestone that associated with oil-tained limestone Limegrit intercalated with clayey limestone and shale bed [ gypsum (bed or/and veinlets)] 15
  16. Geology • The deposits are occurrence in the basal series of Middle Miocene, which lies unconformable the igneous-metamorphic basement complex (Shazley, et al., 1959). • The succession of the country rocks of the ore deposit as follows (Geological Survey, 1963):  Limestone. Top  Conglomeratic lime-grit.  Conglomeratic lime-grit with clay intercalations.  Clay and calcareous sandstone.  Basal Conglomerate. Bottom • The thickness of this Middle Miocene (basal horizon) is 100-150 m (Geological Survey, 1976). • This horizon was deposited under coastal-marine shallow environment and partly continental conditions. The Middle Miocene sediments hosting the lead-zinc mineralization along the Red Sea coast from Quseir to Ras Benas. 16
  17. Geological map of Um Gheig mine area 17
  18. Mineralogy  The nonsulfide Zinc mineral association at Um Gheig mine consists mainly of smithsonite, hydrozincite and hemimorphite, which replace both primary sulfide minerals and carbonate host rocks. The nonsulfide Zinc mineral association at Um Gheig mine consists mainly of smithsonite, hydrozincite and hemimorphite, which replace both primary sulfide minerals and carbonate host rocks.  Smithsonite (ZnCO3) is the most abundant nonsulfide zinc mineral that occurs in two generations in the studied sample, the first generation of smithsonite, occurs as dull, cryptocrystalline with visible crystals, is finely intergrown with goethite. A late generation of smithsonite occurs as clear rhombohedral crystals.  Hydrozincite (Zn5(CO3)2(OH)6) is less abundant compared with smithsonite, occurs in different generations in the studied samples as veins, nodule and Botryodial.  Hemimorphite Zn4Si2O7(OH)2.H2O quite abundant, occurring in at least two generations: i) A first generation occurs as small concretions with a dusty appearance growing in fine grained smithsonite. ii) The second one appears as clear elongated crystals growing in veins and cavities.  Gangue Minerals: Gypsum, calcite, barite, and goethite. Egyptian Ore Deposits Primary Sulfide Galena (black) PbS Sphalerite ZnS Supergeneminerals (Non-Sulfide) Cerussite (Colorless) PbCO3 Smisthonite (White crystal) ZnCO3 Wulfenite (Reddish-brown) PbMoO4 Hydrozincite (Zn5(CO3)2(OH)6) Shannonite Pb2O(CO3) Hemimorphite (Brittle crystal) Zn4Si2O7(OH)2.H2O Lanarkite Pb2O(SO4) Gangue Minerals Gypsum, Calcite, Barite, and Goethite 18
  19. Ore Minerals Ore form and shape: Cavity filling, Veins, Lenses or Pocket zones inside limegrit rocks. Ore body extend vertically for ~65 m and Laterally for: ~150 – 200 m. The zinc and lead ores are generally replacing mainly of white to brownish white massive the limestones or limegrit as pockets or lenses. The deposits may be rich in zinc and lead, which may be preferential by the presence of a cover of hard limestone and bands of clay in the limegrit. Ore reserve:  The Geological Survey of Egypt estimates the reserves in Um Gheig as 1.5 million tons with an average assay of 13.8% Zn and 2.3% Pb.  Um Gheig ore is a nonsulfide Zn (Pb) deposit with estimated reserves of about ~2 million tonnes with an average grade of 10% Zn, 2% Pb (El Aref and Amstutz,1983). Age of Mineralization: Tertiary at time related to Red Sea tectonic 19
  20. Source and Transportations of Zinc and Pb Elements In the Um Gheig area after the progress of the crystalline basement, the area was subjected to erosion for long epoch.  During the Upper Cretaceous and Early Tertiary, submerged and accumulation of the terrigenous-carbonate rocks were occurred.  At that time and the beginning of the Miocene, the tectonic movements occurred in the Red Sea depression.  In this depression accumulated the Middle Miocene terrigenous sediments.  This was followed by a period of marine environment and deposited the carbonate sediments. Consequently, the basement in addition to Lower Miocene sediments has been affected by tectonic processes and Um Gheig deposits may be referred to one of tectonic zones of the fault type. Slightly crushed rocks were subjected to mineralization more than the enclosing rocks. Therefore, faults of the crystalline basement due to the Red Sea Rift create a lot of temperature. Waters from deep in the basin and geothermal fluids from the Precambrian basement have been considered as sources of the ores zinc and lead in the carbonate-hosted deposit, which is in agreement with Hitcho, (2006), Charef and Sheppard, (1987) and Geldmacher, et al, (2008).  This condition assist the redistribution of the ore minerals and their mobilization with the hosting carbonate sediments. 20
  21. Origin Processes where sulphide and sulphate solutions move to zinc-Lead ore are mainly hosted by are limegrit, conglomeritic limegrit, gypsum, clayey limestone and oil-tained limestone  (i.e., Contiental to shallow marine facies or lagoonal facies (syngenetic origin)  Source of mineralized solutions: volcanic exhalations from continental  Telethermal high distance.  Both waters from deep in the basin and geothermal fluids from the crystalline rocks (i.e., basement) have been considered as sources of the ores lead and zinc in the carbonate-hosted deposit.  Oxidation process is a main alteration and only observed south portion of the mine. Mine extend to south which revealed to change in precipitation conditions from sulphide to oxidation process.  The Pb-Zn ores in Um Gheig confide the oxidation zone above the water level.  Clay content of the hosted rocks play an important role in partitioning and up take the zinc, furthermore, Fe–Mn oxy-hydroxides and the sulfide minerals play a significant role for mobilizing and trapping the Pb at the oxic–suboxic in subsurface layers. The genesis of Pb/Zn mineralization may be considered as epigenetic nature.  Probable mechanism that leads to the formation of such deposits taking into consideration the reactions which may be taken place as a result of interaction of the basement rocks with different attacking reactant chemicals produced during the old geological ages. 21
  22. Abu Ghorban • Wadi Abu Ghorban is located in the Red Sea coastal zone, 55 km south of Quseir, 6.5 km SW of the bay of Marsa Um Gheig about 3 km to the east of Um Gheig Pb-Zn mine. The downstream of W. Abu Ghorban is located at about 3 km from that of W. Um Gheig. • Abu Ghorban locality occupies about 6 km2 as narrow belt (1- 4 km) striking NW. It is covered with Miocene clastic, carbonate and evaporite sediments occasionally to the east capped with recent terrace deposits. These sediments rest with sharp angular dis-conformity upon the Precambrian basement rocks that, exposed to the east of the occurrence. 22
  23. 23
  24. References El Aref, M.M. and Amstutz, G.C. (1983): Lead-zinc deposits along the Red Sea coast of Egypt, new observations and enetic models on the occurrences of Um Gheig, Wizr, Essel and ZugEl Bohar. Monogr. Ser. on Mineral Deposits, Borntraeger Stuttgart, 21, 103p El Shazly, E. M.; Mansour, A.; Afia, M. S.; and Ghobrial, M. G. (1959). Miocene Lead and Zinc Deposits in Egypt. 20th International Geological Congress, Mexico, pp.119-134. Hassaan, M.M. (1990): Studies on lead -zinc sulphide mineralization in the Red Sea coastal zone, Egypt: Proc. 8th Symp. IGADO, Otowa, Canada, pp. 835-847. Hilmy, M. E.; Nakhla, F. M.; and Ramsy, M. 1972. Contribution to the Mineralogy, Geochemistry, and Genesis of the Miocene Pb-Zn Deposits in Egypt. Chemie der Erde, Vol. 31, pp. 373-390. Hitzman, M.W., Reynolds, N.A., Sangster, D.F., Allen, C.R., and Carman, C. (2003): Classification, genesis, and exploration guides for non-sulfide zinc deposits, ECONOMIC GEOLOGY, Vol. 98, p.685–714 Large, D. , (2003): The geology of non-sulphide zinc deposits-an overview. Erzmetall,Vol. 54, p. 264–276 Boni, M. , (2005): The Geology and Mineralogy of Nonsulfide Zinc Ore Deposits. Proceedings of LEAD and ZINC '05, Kyoto 17–19 October, pp. 1299–1314 Woollett, A. (2005): The processing of non-sulphide zinc deposits. In: Boni, M., Gilg, H.A.(Eds.), European Science Foundation (ESF) Workshop on Nonsulfide Zn–Pb Deposits, Iglesias, 21– 23 April, Abstract 1 pp. de Wet, K., and Singleton, J.D. (2008): Development of a viable process for the recovery of zinc from oxide ores. The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Proceedings of LEAD and ZINC '08, Durban, pp. 177–192 24
  25. Follow me on Social Media http://facebook.com/hzharraz http://www.slideshare.net/hzharraz https://www.linkedin.com/in/hassan-harraz-3172b235 25
  26. Copper deposits in Egypt are well known since ancient times. Copper extraction is in all probability the first metal to be mined in ancient Egypt during the Neolithic Period (6000- 2900 BC, also called New Stone Age). Ancient Egyptian copper mines contain those at Wadi El- Maghara, Wadi Samra and Serabit el-Khadim in Sinai (Fig. 20), and at Wadi Araba, Wadi Sitra, Hamash, Wadi Dara and Buhen in the Eastern Desert. The amount of copper the Egyptians produced annually was about four tons during the Bronze Age. The ancient mining complex of Serabit el-Khadim lies on a small plateau north of Al-Tor city. Introduction 26
  27. To mine the turquoise and copper, the Egyptians would hollow out large galleries in the mountains, carving at the entrance to each a representation of the reigning pharaoh who was the symbol of the authority of the Egyptian state over the mines. A huge quantity of turquoise over that period was mined, carried down the Wadi Matalla to a garrisoned port located at el-Markha (south of Abu Zenima), and loaded aboard ships bound for Egypt. The turquoise was then used both for jewelry and to make color pigments for painting. Stone tool assemblages made up of flint scrapers, hand axes, and pounders comprise the largest corpus of mining tools found at the Serabit el-Khadim turquoise and copper mines (Elizabeth, 2010). Copper staining, Eastern Desert, Egypt 27
  28. Maps Bible Archeology Timna Serabit el-Khadim, Egyptian mining copper-turquoise 28
  29. Turquoise Mines at Sarabit el-Khadem,Sinai 29
  30. Egyptian Turquoise Egypt was a country rich in gold and precious stones. 2600 years BC, there were turquoise mines at Wadi Maghara in the Sinai. 30
  31. Turquoise Turquoise mining is known to have been carried on at Serabit el Khadim, near Um Bogma, for an extended period. Engineers of the Sinai Manganese Company stated that numerous additional small turquoise mines occur in the region. Hume (1906) also reported turquoise occurrences at Gebel Maghara. No other information regarding turquoise mines and occurrences could be obtained during our investigation. Turquoise mining is typically a small, labor-intensive industry. Deposits generally occur as thin seams along fractures or small pockets of pebbly stone in a sandstone matrix. Owing to this distribution and the fragile nature of the material, mass mining techniques are not applicable and blasting must be minimized. However, despite the labor intensive nature of turquoise mineral, it can be a lucrative enterprise. Top-quality turquoise brings up to LE 200 per kilogram on the European wholesale market. Although, limited as a major industrial growth resource, turquoise exploitation potential in south Sinai should be investigated. If sufficiently rich deposits are found, market development, minor financial aid, and technical assistance could launch a cottage industry with long-term income potential for numerous small mines. 31
  32. Mode of Occurrences The copper deposits were encountered at several areas in Eastern Desert and Sinai, such as: Abu Swayel, Gabbro Akarem, Geneina Gharbia, Hamash, Um Qareiyat, and Um Samuki.  In Egypt, copper deposits expressed in different mode of occurrences and geologic settings as following: 1) Mafic-Ultramafic Assemblages: Copper extracted from sulphide deposits that is well known to occur in two petrological assemblages of mafic-ultramafic assemblages: a) Cu-NiCo Sulphide Deposits:  This type of mineralization is well represented in Abu Swayel in South Eastern Desert. The ore is closely related to mafic-ultramafic and gabbro members of ophiolite sequence b) Cu-Ni Sulphide Deposits :  This type of mineralization occurs in layered mafic-ultramafic intrusions like gabbro rocks at Akarem and El Geneina El Gharbia . An extensive program of exploration was conducted in the two areas, and the occurrences were found to be uneconomic. 2) Felsic Assemblages Cu-porphyry deposits are known to occur in felsic assemblages at Hamash and Um Garayiat areas. 3) Stratiform Massive Sulphide (Zn-Cu-Pb) Deposits  This type of mineralization is represented by a group of small lenses highly enriched in Zn-Cu- Pb mineralization that associated with talc deposits in South Eastern Desert (e.g., Um Samuki, Helgit, Maakal, Darhib, Atshan, Abu Gurdi, and Egat). 4) Copper Sediments  Several occurrences of copper were recorded in Phanerozoic sediments in Northern portion of Eastern Desert (at Wadi Araba, Wadi Sitra, Hamash, Wadi Dara and Buhen) and in the Centre and West Sinai (e.g., Wadi El-Maghara, Wadi Samra and Serabit el-Khadim) as secondary malachite and in some places mixed with Manganese.  The reserves are limited. 32
  33. Mineral deposits associated with mafic-ultramafic assemblages 1) In ophiolite sequence a) b) Cu-Ni-Co sulphide deposits c) 2) In layered mafic-ultramafic intrusions a) Cu-Ni sulphide deposits b) 33
  34. 1) Copper Associated Mafic-Ultramafic Assemblages  The area was discovered by the ancient Egyptians who exploited the oxidized top part for copper and malachite to a depth of 10 m by open pits.  No mining activities have been recorded in modern times; however, geologic and feasibility studies were conducted by DEMAG of West Germany in 1960.  This work included deepening the shaft to 69 m, but the results showed that the deposit is not economic.  Abu Swayel is considered one of the most important Cu-Ni occurrences known in Egypt were discovered and exploited by ancient Egyptians thousands of years ago. a) Cu-Ni±Co-SULPHIDE DEPOSITS This type of mineralization is well represented in Abu Swayel in South Eastern Desert. The ore is closely related to mafic-ultramafic and gabbro members of ophiolite sequence Abu Swayel Copper Occurrence 34
  35. 35
  36. Schematic diagram of a typical sequence of rock types and mineral depostis in oceanic crust generated at a mid-ocean ridge spreading center. Fragments of ocean crust found in mountain belts are called ophiolites. Ophiolites and their associated mineral deposits are emplaced in mountain belts when ocean crust is subducted and continents collide (after, Constantinou, 1980). 36
  37. Abu Swayel Cu-Ni±Co Sulphide Deposit Locality: This deposit is located at ~185 km southeastern of Aswan, near the head of Wadi Haimour, and is located at latitudes 22º 47' N and longitude 33º38' E (Fig.1). Topographically: the area have been dissected by three main wades (Haimur, Abu Swayel, and Mereikha) which are tectonically controlled and possessing a direction roughly NE-SW. The Abu Swayel Cu-Ni deposit occurs in conformable, lens- like bodies of mafic-ultramafic rocks in Proterozoic metasediments. The mineralization and the enclosing rocks have been metamorphosed to amphibolite facies. The ore body includes both massive and disseminated mineralization hosted in a lenticular sheet-like body of amphibolite, ~500 m long, 30 m wide, striking NW-SE with dips at 60-80°NE, following the regional structures of the enclosing biotite schist. Host Rocks: The amphibolite lens is surrounded by biotite- garnet-schist of basic derivation. The amphibolite and biotite-garnet-schist may represent the metamorphosed equivalents of the gabbro and the basalt of dismembered ophiolite suite, respectively. 37
  38. Wadi Allaqi gold, copper, and nickel occurrences. 38
  39. 39
  40. Fig.2: Simplified cross section of the Abu Swayel Mine. 40
  41. Abu Swayel Sulfide Mineralogy  In all samples studied the sulfides do not show any primary magmatic textures; most of the sulfide minerals occur as stringers, fracture fillings in narrow veinlets, a few millimeters wide and interstitial to the silicates. A systematic study of samples representing the different mineralized rocks revealed the presence of the following types of sulfides: i) The oxidized type consists mainly of hematite, limonite with local enrichment of malachite and azurite. Relics of primary sulfides are rare. The contact between the oxidized and the fresh sulfides is sharp due to absence of a stable water table (Bassyouni, 1960). ii) Primary sulfides occur as two types: (a) disseminated chalcopyrite-pyrrhotite-pyrite-bornite. The bulk of sulfides occurs as grains interstitial to, or along the cleavage planes of metamorphic amphiboles and chlorite. The sulfide content varies between 2 and 30 vol % with a general increase toward the shear plane. The disseminated sulfides represent approximately 90% of the reserves. (b) Massive or banded chalcopyrite, either as veins or stringers elongated parallel to the foliation at the bottom of the hanging wall rocks. A zone of mobilized massive sulfides is encountered along the symmetamorphic shear plane.  The primary sulfides comprise chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite, pyrite, cubanite, violarite, pentlandite, bornite, and accessory sphalerite, valleriite, heazlewoodite, parkerite, mackinawite, and molybdenite. Ilmenite is the major oxide mineral whereas hematite and rutile are minor.  Sulfide minerals exhibit metamorphic features such as preferred orientation of crystals, fine mineralogical layering, and filling tension fractures in metamorphic plagioclase and garnet. Most of these sulfides are considered primary minerals exsolved subsequently from a metamorphic monosulfide solid solution during postmetamorphic cooling.  The ore minerals are representing mainly by pyrite, pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, pentlandite, bravoite, violarite, cubanite and ilmenite, with brochiantite, chalcanthite and malachite in the oxidation zone. Mineralogy of Platinum-Group and Related Minerals  Six platinum-group minerals are described: michenerite, froodite, merenskyite, sudburyite, geversite, and palladian bismuthian melonite. Hessite, joseite, altaite, bismuthinite, and electrum are common associated minerals.  Most of the PGM (80%) occur in massive sulfide bodies. Ore reserves were estimated at 85000 tonnes of ore containing 2.8% Cu and 1.53% Ni and minor amounts of Co. 41
  42. Abu Swayel Origin: The Cu and Ni sulphides were formed as a result of liquid immiscibilities from the silicate melt during solidification of the basic magma into an oceanic crust. Mineral assemblages and textural relations indicate precipitation of PGE during postmetamorphic cooling, over a 'wide range of temperatures. The presence of PCM on tension fractures in metamorphic plagioclase and almandine-rich garnet in association with Pb, Bi, and Ag tellurides illustrates the participation of hydrothermal solutions generated during amphibolite facies metamorphism in the transport and concentration of PGE. This also underlines the possible role of metamorphic processes in the formation of PGE deposits. • Chalcopyrite, cubanite, pyrrhotite, pyrite, and violarite are the major sulfide minerals. At the peak of amphibolite facies metamorphism, the associated fluid regimes resulted in remobilization and transport of Cu-rich sulfides and PGE and in the development of hydrosilicate alteration zones. 42
  43. b) Cu-Ni sulphide deposits This type of mineralization occurs in layered mafic-ultramafic intrusions like gabbro rocks at Akarem and El Geneina El Gharbia . An extensive program of exploration was conducted in the two areas, and the occurrences were found to be uneconomic. Gabbro Akarem Fig. 1. Location map of the Gabbro Akarem ; Genina Gharbia area and other concentrically zoned complexes in the Eastern Desert of Egypt (Helmy & El Mahallawi 2003). Deep structures revealed by geophysical studies in the Eastern Desert of Egypt from Garson and Shalaby (1976) 43
  44. 44
  45. Gabbro Akarem Copper Deposit  It located 130 km east of Aswan and 130 km west of Bernice (5 km south of Wadi Kharit and 20 km South-East of Gebel Homr Akarem) at Latitude 24o1'N and Longitude 34o17'E.  It was first discovered during reconnaissance geochemical prospecting in March 1972 in a gabbro peridotite complex by Victor A.Bugrov and I.M. Shalaby. So, this locality has been given the name of Gabbro Akarem by them.  Host Rocks: Gabbro Akarem is a small mafic- ultramafic complex composed of two small bodies lying midway between Aswan and Berenice. According to Carter (1975) and Carter et al (1978), the complex consists of two separate bodies which are steeply dipping dike-like intrusions, with inward dipping contacts against metasediments. This belt is differentiated into gabbro and peridotitic types (gabbro, olivine – gabbro, gabbro – norite, pyroxenite and peridotites) and is cut a cross by a system of diabase and gabbro-diabase dykes.  Ore Body:  The main bulk of the complex is composed of noritic rocks, intruded by pipe-like bodies of peridotites in two generations, the later of which is mineralized with Cu- Ni sulphide minerals.  These rocks were found with traces of Cu-Ni sulphide mineralization and form a magmatic belt extending 11.5 km in ENE- WSW direction with a width of from 1 up to 3 km.  The sulphide mineralization occurs as disseminating or as massive bands and the sulphide grains are molded around the silicate crystals with no signs of replacement.  The mineralization is expressed in the form of three zones of gossans within the peridotites and is possibly resulted to massive sulphide bands. 45
  46. Fig. : Geological map of Gabbro Akarem area, Eastern Desert, Egypt (Carter 1975) 46
  47. Fig. 2. Geological sketch-map of the southwestem gossan zone at Gabbro Akarem (After Bugrov and Shalaby, 1973). 47
  48. Mineralogy Primary sulphide minerals:  Primary sulphide assemblage includes pyrrhotite, pentlandite, chalcopyrite and cubanite. Pyrrhotite and pentlandite are replaced partially by a pyrite, marcasite, violarite and mackinwite.  In the fresh gabbroidal rock it is possible to find disseminated sulphides, i.e. 1)Pyrrhotite [Fe1-xS] softer than pyrite FeS2 (predominant) and 2)Chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) like gold in colour and 3)Pentlandite [(Fe, Ni)9S8 associated with pyrrhotite] and cubanite (CuFe3S3) were identified.  Also there are four zones of gossans were discovered during reconnaissance geochemical studies in the area (Fig.5), the distance between the western and eastern zones being about 7 km. The gossans are generally reddish – yellow to dark brownish – red in colour, light in weight and with cellular texture, they are typical of the oxidation of post massive sulphides (Fig.6). Secondary minerals  In the host rock developed in and around the gossans there are secondary copper- nickel minerals with associated "copper-green" stains including: 1)Malachite[Cu2CO3(OH)2], 2)Chrysocolla [CuH2(Si2O5)(OH)4] 3)Turquoise [ CuAl6(PO4)4(OH)3.5H2O] and 4)Garnierite [(Ni, Mg)3 Si2O8(OH)4]. 48
  49. Reserves  The mineralization was traced on the surface, and four exploratory drilholes were put down, with a total of 621m.  It is evident that neither the grade nor the tonnage permits consideration of exploitation under present circumstances.  The total Reserves were estimated at 700,000 tonnes of mineralized peridotite at a grade of 0.95 % combined Ni and Cu, of which 270,000 tonnes of grade 1.18% Ni+Cu are proven.  No mining activities have been done so far. 49
  50. Gabbro Akarem is now considered to be a Precambrian analogue of an Alaskan-type complex (Helmy & Mogessie 2001, Helmy & El Mahallawi, 2003).  The Cu–Ni–PGE mineralization at Gabbro Akarem is hosted mainly in ultramafic dunite pipes and shows a typical magmatic mineralogy and textures. Three platinum-group minerals (merenskyite, michenerite, palladoan bismuthian melonite) were documented (Helmy & Mogessie, 2001). The consistently low PGE contents (PGE <270 ppb) and their uniform distribution in sulfide-bearing and barren rocks were attributed to rapid crystallization of sulfides in a highly dynamic environment. Fig.4: Drillhole sections 2, 3, and 7 Gabbro Akarem No.1 (after Carter, 1973). 50
  51. Fig. 5: Variation diagram of 100Cr/(Cr + Al) versus 100Fe 2+ /(Mg + Fe 2+ ) ( left ) and 100Fe 3+ /(Fe 3+ + Cr + Al) versus 100Fe 2+ / (Mg + Fe 2+ ) ( right ) for spinel 51
  52. Origin The sulphide mineralization occurs as disseminating or as massive bands and the sulphide grains are molded around the silicate crystals with no signs of replacement. →This indicates that the sulphides are magmatic and constituted an integral part of the original magma. The ore was formed as a result of pre-intrusion segregation, followed by the emplacement of successive phases, starting with norite and ending with the mineralized peridotite which represents the residual sulphide bearing fraction of the primary magma. Gabbro Akarem was emplaced in association with a deep-seated transverse tectonic structure trending ENE. It is therefore suggested that, like most of the layered mafic- ultramafic intrusions in the world (Eckstrand 1984), Gabbro Akarem was formed from a mafic magma, mantle – derived in most cases, which was emplaced quiescently in multiple phases at higher crustal levels in a tensional rift environment. 52
  53. Genetic model of concentrically-zoned Gabbro-Akarem igneous complex (after Helmy& EL Mahallawi,2003) 53
  54. Genina Gharbia Cu-Ni occurrence is located in the intersection of Latitude 23º 57'N and Longitude 34º 37'E where gossans with Cu and Ni do exist. A gossan with copper and nickel secondary minerals was discovered in 1973 during a geochemical exploration program undertaken by the Aswan Mineral Survey Project. Figure 1. Location map and aerial photograph of the Genina Gharbia complex, Eastern Desert, Egypt. 54
  55. Fig. 2. Geological map of the Genina Gharbia area (after Fredricksson, 1974). Host Rocks: The Genina Gharbia intrusion is a small late Precambrian mafic– ultramafic complex in the Eastern Desert of Egypt. It comprises harzburgite, lherzolite, pyroxenite, norite and gabbro. The intrusion is not metamorphosed, but highly affected by faulting and shearing, and most of the original contacts have been obliterated. The various rocks are characterized by high modal content of magnesiohornblende and abundant phlogopite and fluorapatite. 55
  56. Ore minerals In the area, disseminated and massive Cu–Ni sulfide ore is hosted in mafic–ultramafic rocks of Precambrian age. The Cu–Ni ore forms either disseminations in peridotite or massive patches in gabbro and consists of pyrrhotite [Fe1- xS] > pentlandite [(Fe, Ni)9S8] = chalcopyrite> pyrite = violarite = cubanite and minor cobaltite–gersdorffite, nickeline, sphalerite, molybdenite and valleriite. Fresh ore minerals are represented mainly by Pyrite (FeS2), Pyrrhotite [Fe1-xS], Chalcopyrite (CuFeS2), and Pentlandite [(Fe, Ni)9S8]. Malachite [Cu2CO3(OH)2], and Garnierite [(Ni,Mg)3Si2O8(OH)4] stained gossans are associated with thrust slices of mafic-ultramafic rocks that include peridotite, pyroxenite and gabbros. Intense alteration commonly is associated with sulfides in gabbroic rocks, in which the silicate assemblage is dominated by actinolite, chlorite, epidote, albite and quartz. The metal assays are 0.17 % Cu and 0.38 % Ni. The total Cu + Ni locally reaches up to 1.5 wt%, with a Cu : Ni ratio <1. 56
  57. Fig. 3. Detailed geological map of the mineralized portion of Genina Gharbia intrusion, indicating drill-core sites. 57
  58. Mineralogy of Platinum-Group and Related Minerals  Platinum-group minerals (PGM) are restricted to bismuthotellurides of Pd, (i.e., michenerite and the melonite–merenskyite) series;  no Pt minerals were identified.  The PGM are usually associated with hessite, altaite, tsumoite, sylvanite and native tellurium.  90% of the PGM and other tellurides grains are located at sulfide–silicate contacts and as inclusions in altered silicates. Platinum-group elements (PGE) concentrations (maximum 260 ppb Pd, 65 ppb Pt, 9 ppb Rh, 38 ppb Ir, 10 ppb Ru, 7 ppb Os) were determined in sulfide-bearing materials. The Pd : Pt ratio increases from the hornblende harzburgite to hornblende gabbro. Origin The mineralogical and chemical characteristics of the Genina Gharbia mineralization are best explained by a three-stage process: (1) a stage of magmatic crystallization in which the base metals and precious metals were concentrated in a sulfide melt largely in the harzburgite and lherzolite, (2) a late-magmatic stage in which base metals and precious metals were concentrated in a volatile-rich fluid, and (3) a postmagmatic stage of faulting and shearing, which locally remobilized metals and concentrated them along shear zones.  In stage (1), the PGE were hosted in base-metal sulfides, mainly pentlandite and cobaltite–gersdorffite. The availability of semimetals (Te, Bi) in the late-magmatic fluid controlled the deposition of PGM in stage (2). 58
  59. 59
  60. Figure 10B. Cross section of a stratovolcano showing the relative locations of porphyry copper deposits, lead-zinc veins, gold-silver veins, and sulfur deposits. 60
  61. 2) COPPER ASSOCIATED FELSIC ASSEMBLAGES (or PORPHYRY COPPER DEPOSITS) Porphyry copper deposits have certain characteristics in common, including: a)Large reserves and low metal grade. b)Association with subvolcanic, calc-alkaline, intermediate to acid intrusions with a porphyry phase among the intrusive rocks. c)A spatial relationship to deep crustal fractures or old benioff zones. d)Extensive, zonally arranged hydrothermal alterations with: potassic-, phyllic-, argillic-, and propylitic-zones, arranged from the inside outwards, and e) Simple mineralogy of disseminated and stringer sulphides of which pyrite is the most abundant, followed by chalcopyrite, bornite, chalcocite and covellite, and where Mo and/or Au are sometimes found in concentrations high enough to name the deposits a porphyry Cu-Mo or Cu-Au deposit. Taking all of these features into consideration, Ivanov and Hussein (1972) suggested that two porphyry copper prospects are present in Egypt, at Hamash and Um Garayiat areas. 61
  62. a) Hamash Area Hamash area has long been known for its Au deposit. Later, it was noted that, in the wider area, several localities have strong hydrothermal alterations and malachite stainings along joints and fractures. Five localities with High concentrations of Cu and Mo (up to 0.5 wt.%, 300ppm, respectively) are known in the Hamash area. i.e. Um Hagalig, Ara West, Ara East, Um Tundub, Hamash North and the Hamash gold mine (Fig. 1).  Mineralization: Fe-Cu sulfides in the veins representing by pyrite and chalcopyrite were altered to secondary chalcocite, bornite and digenite. Hematite and magnetite are the main oxide minerals. Quartz contain inclusions of gold as well as remobilized gold along cracks and microfractures. The coarse-grained pink granite and granodiorite and the surrounding metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks are the main hosts of copper mineralization (Bugrov, 1972; Moustafa and Hilmy, 1958). Garson and Shalaby (1976) suggest that the mineralized rocks at Hamash were emplaced on the continental margin above a steeply dipping Benioff zone. In a recent investigation of the deposit Hilmy and Osman (1989) describe remobilization of gold from a high temperature chalcopyrite and pyrite assemblage. These were noted at • Um Hagalia a zone of intensive propylitization, sericitization, kaolinization and silicification occurs within the granodiorite porphyry. A number of quartz veins with malachite cut the granodiorite porphyry and were excavated in the past. Cu up to 0.5% was found in close vicinity to the veins, with ~50 ppm Mo. • Ara East and Ara West quartz-sericite-pyrite zones are characteristic with 500 ppm Cu and 80 ppm Mo • Hamash North is more interesting area, with abundant quartz veins with pyrite-chalcopyrite as well as the presence of gossans and zones of hydrothermal alterations (up to 500 m long and 100 m wide) within the andesite-granodiorite porphyry. Analysis of samples from the alteration zones yield Cu 200-500 ppm and Mo (10-50ppm). • Um Tundub a zone of hydrothermal alteration almost circular and ~2000 m X 1700 m, excluding the outmost propylitized rocks. Within this zone, concentric, more or less complete, subzones are recognized with propylitized to the outside, pyrophyllitization-sericitization in the middle, an inner subzone of silicification, alunitization and development of a small amount of hydrobiotite. Pyrite is disseminated and fills cracks and fractures to a depth of 250 m. This body of pyrite is estimated to contain 500 million tonnes of pyrites, but other sulphides are almost absent. 62
  63. Figure 1: Geologic Map of Hamash area, south Eastern Desert, Egypt (after El Ramly and Akaad, 1960). 63
  64. Fig.2: Geologic Map of Hamash Gold Mine area, south Eastern Desert, Egypt. 64
  65. b) Um Garayiat • Um Garayiat area (22° 34/ N and 33° 24/ E) is located at the SW sector of the Eastern Desert. • Copper occurrences at, ~175 km to the SSE of Aswan city, on the right bank of Wadi Allaqi. • The area is made up of different assemblages of granodiorite and quartz-andesite porphyries. • The granodiorite porphyry intrusion shows concentric, almost complete zones of hydrothermal alteration, and very rich sulfide mineralization, now in the oxidized state and forming gossan-like bodies. The central core of quartz porphyry (granodiorite) suffered intrusive silicification, sericitization, pyrophyllitization, and development of minor hydrobiotite. These are followed outwards by kaolinization and propylitization. Pyrite mineralization is superimposed on these alterations, which pass gradually into less altered rocks, then fresh rocks. Within the silicified core, minor quartz veins and lenses with apatite, tourmaline and occasional specks of native gold are encountered. • The sequence of events leading to the mineralization of Um Garayiat must have begun with the emplacement of andesite-granodiorite porphyry in a subvolcanic environment. The parent magma was intermediate to acid in composition and rich in volatiles (e.g., Au, As, Ag, Mo, and Cu). The emplacement was immediately followed by propylitization of a wide area caused by circulating ground water heated by the magmatic bodies. The magmatic phase of hydrothermal alterations started by the formation of a little hydrobiotite or orthoclase (potassium metasomatism). High temperature silicification and pyrophyllitization. This stage was accompanied by the apatite and tourmaline-bearing quartz lenses, and small amounts of pyrite, pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite. Another phase of silicification followed, and with it most of the pyrite and some of the native gold were introduced. The third, low temperature phase of silica introduction was accompanied by most of the gold and silver, mainly in the form of veins in the mined area. 65
  66. Wadi Allaqi projection location plan (Gippsland Limited Annual Report 2007) Garayat prospect - location of gold occurrences (Gippsland Limited Annual Report 2007) 66
  67.  Two possibilities are suggested to explain failure to encounter Cu-mineralization at the various sites of Hamash and Um Um Garayiat areas:- i. Copper was not introduced, being very poor in the mineralizing solutions., or ii. It was formed but subsequently leached and/or eroded out down below the level of mineralization and almost completely from the zone of oxidation. But, is present deeper, probably with a supergene enrichment zone. 67
  68. Figure 10: Cross section schematically illustrating the characteristic features of volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits. Hydrothermal fluids move upwards along fractures in volcanic rocks towards the sea floor. When the hot hydrothermal fluids vent and mix with cold ocean water, iron, copper, lead, and zinc sulfide minerals can form and collect as a mound on the sea floor. Ore minerals also can form in the fractures underlying the mound of sulfide materials (after Lydon, 1988). 68
  69. Fig. 1 Location of VMS deposits or districts in the Arabian–Nubian shield, and bordering areas. Egypt: 1 Hamama and Abu Marawat; 2 Um Samuiki. Sudan: 3 Hamissana district (Uar, Hamissana, Onib, Tbon, Eigiet, and Adarmo deposits); 4 Gebiet; 5 Serakoit; 6 Ariab (Hassai) district; 7 Eyob district (Tohamyam, Abu Samar, Eyob, Derudeb, and Tagoteb deposits); 8 NE Nuba Mountains (*1100 Ma, external to ANS) Tumluk, Jabal, Fayo, and Agbash deposits. Eritrea: 9 Bisha district (see Fig. 3); 10 Asmara district. Ethiopia: 11 Tarakimti, 12 Abetselo, Azale, and Akendayu; 13 Tulu Boli and Wankey. Uganda: 14 Kilembe (external to ANS). Kenya: 15 Macalder (external to ANS). Saudi Arabia: 16 Ash Shizm; 17 Nuqrah, Nuqrah North, Nuqrah South, An Nimahr; 18 Jabal Sayid, Umm Ad Damar; 19 As Safra; 20 Ar Ridaniya, Khnaiguiyah, Al Amar, Umm Ash Shalahib; 21 Shayban, Jabal Baydan; 22 Shaib Lamisah; 23 Shaab Al Taare, Wadi Bidah, Gehab, Rabathan, Jadmar, Al Hajar; 24 Al Masane; 25 Kutam. See Tadasse et al. (2003), Ogola (2006), Owor et al. (2007), Barrie et al. (2007), Johnson et al. (2011) 69
  70.  Volcanofenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits are known in many localities in the Eastern Desert of Egypt, i.e., Um Samiuki, Helgate, Maaqal, Derhib and Abu Gurdi.  Massive and disseminated sulfides are present in all localities, however many differences among these deposits do exist.  The comparative geological, mineralogical canogenic and geochemical studies enabled the distinction of two groups: 1) The first group, Um Samiuki, Helgate and Maaqal are hosted in felsic volcanics and pyroclastics in a certain stratigraphic level in the Shadli Metavolcanics. Although massive sulfides of these deposits are located along fault zones, disseminated sulfides are encountered in the metavolcanics. Sphalerite, chalcopyrite, pyrite and galena are the major sulfides. Sphalerite is Mn-rich (up to 5.5 wt.%) and Cd-poor (<0.1%) and shows a wide range of Fe content (from 0.5 to 4.5 %). Galena is pure PbS, no Ag or Se was detected. Tellurides are represented by Ag-tellurides. Gangue minerals are Mn-minerals, barite, calcite, talc and Mn-chlorite. Geochemically, these deposits are Zn-dominated. 2) The second group is represented by Derhib and Abu Gurdi, the sulfides are located along major shear zones crossing ophiolite succession. No primary depositional features were observed, metamorphic and deformational features are dominant. Chalcopyrite, pyrite, sphalerite and galena are common. Sphalerite is enriched in Cd (up to 5.1 %) and depleted in Mn (<0.3%). It shows a bimodal distribution of FeS (2.1 and 9.3 mol.% FeS). Galena is generally enriched in Se (up to 7.2%). Ag, Pb and Bi tellurides are present. These deposits are Cu-dominated. It is concluded that the first group is genetically related to the hosting island arc volcanics while the second group is connected to ophiolite succession and were later modified during tectonism and metamorphism. The differences in telluride mineralogy, trace element contents of sulfides and ore chemistry reflect the magmatic environments at which the ore-forming fluids were originated and the post-magmatic processes. 70
  71. Fig. 1. Location map showing the distribution of BIF and massive sulphide deposits in the Eastern Desert of Egypt. Inset map shows gold occurrences nearby the Abu Marawat area (compiled from Kochn et al., 1968). 71
  72. 3) STRATIFORM MASSIVE SULPHIDE (Zn-Cu-Pb) DEPOSITS  This type of mineralization is represented by a group of small lenses associated with talc deposits in South Eastern Desert at: Um Samiuki, Helgate, Maakal, Atshan, Darhib, Abu Gurdi, and Egat. Um Samiuki Deposits  Um Samiuki Zn-Cu-Pb-Ag sulfide deposit  Um Samiuki deposit lies in the intersection of latitude 24º 14' N and long 34º 30 E.  Host rocks: The area is mainly built of calc-alkaline island arc volcanics andesite and their pyroclastics and were later subjected to conditions of greenschist-facies metamorphism (Searle et al.,1976). Small lenses of the massive sulfides (Zn-Cu-Pb-Ag), are consisting of pyrite, sphalerite, chalcopyrite and galena, exposed as gossans on the surface and inducing a greenish tint to white colours talc materials in their vicinity. The ore body in the Western part assays 21.6 % Zn, 2.2 % Cu, 0.5 % Pb and 109 g/t Ag with total reserves of 200,000 tons (Searle et al., 1976) while the Eastern part is less in metal content where Zn 13.6 %, Cu posses 1.8 %,and Pb 3.4%. Total Reserves: 300,000 ton of massive ore the Umm Samiuki deposit is currently mined for Zn and Cu. 72
  73. Latitude & Longitude (WGS84): 24° 13' 58'' North , 34° 50' 4'' East Latitude & Longitude (decimal): 24.2327777778, 34.8344444444 Um Samiuki Mine Um Samiuki Mine, Eastern Desert, Red Sea Governorate, Egypt 73
  74. Um Samiuki Mine Fig. 1 : Satellite image showing Helgate–Maaqal area located within the Shadli metavolcanic belt and Derhib–Abu Gurdi area located to the south of the belt, note the structural boundary (yellow dashed line) separating Shadli metavolcanic belt from ophiolitic succession 74
  75. Figure 1: Geologic Map of Um Samiuki area, south Eastern Desert, Egypt 75
  76. Figure 1: Geologic map of Helgate and Maaqal prospects area, south Eastern Desert, Egypt (after El Habaak, 1986) 76
  77. Drillhole sections at Um Samiuki mine. 77
  78. The ore bodies overlay a stockwork of altered rocks resulting from intensive metasomatic effects induced by the ascending volcanic exhalation on the channel ways through which they ascended (Hussein et al., 1977). The mineralization can be attributed to epigenetic process, where it was introduced by hydrothermal solutions along shear zones developed by replacement of pre-existing rocks. On the contrary of epigenetic hydrothermal deposition, Hussein et al. (1977) and Hussein (1990) believed that this deposit is a massive sulphide body which was deposited during the Abu Hamamid volcanics episode on the top of submarine volcanic vent system and the sedimentation took place conformally with the enclosing rocks at the interface between the volcanic pile and sea water. Origin 78
  79. 4) Copper Sandstone deposit Precambrian crystalline rocks at a number of locations in south Sinai bear thin quartz veins of short length which contain copper carbonate, probably an oxidation product of sparse chalcopyrite. These types of deposits have no practical exploration potential. Historically, copper has been produced from copper oxide-bearing sandstones of the Cambrian Serabit el Khadim Formation or from overlying lower Carboniferous strata. Extensive beds of cupriferous sandstone in these units are reported to have been mined in ancient times near Wadi Maghara in west central Sinai. Ores are described as containing up to 18% copper in carbonates and silicates. Numerous other locations with cupriferous sandstone outcrops have been described by Egyptian geologists who have worked in the region. The deposits are sometimes associated with sandstone-bearing uranium and silver. Several occurrences of copper were recorded in Phanerozoic sediments in Northern portion of Eastern Desert (at Wadi Araba, Wadi Sitra, Hamash, Wadi Dara and Buhen) and in the Centre and West Sinai (e.g., Wadi El-Maghara, Wadi Samra and Serabit el- Khadim) as secondary malachite and in some places mixed with Manganese. Moreover, recent technological developments allow these ores to be treated at very low cost, making them attractive exploration targets. 79
  80. Ancient copper mine Copper deposit at Wadi Samra, Sinai 80
  81. Sinai Precambrian crystalline rocks at a number of locations in south Sinai bear thin quartz veins of short length which contain copper carbonate, probably an oxidation product of sparse chalcopyrite. These types of deposits have no practical exploration potential. Historically, copper has been produced from copper oxide-bearing sandstones of the Cambrian Serabit el Khadim Formation or from overlying lower Carboniferous strata. Extensive beds of cupriferous sandstone in these units are reported to have been mined in ancient times near Wadi Maghara in west central Sinai. Ores are described as containing up to 18% copper in carbonates and silicates. Numerous other locations with cupriferous sandstone outcrops have been described by Egyptian geologists who have worked in the region. While the ore has been no thorough evaluation of a copper sandstone deposit in Sinai, comparable deposits elsewhere have supported economic mining operations. The deposits are sometimes associated with sandstone-bearing uranium and silver. Moreover, recent technological developments allow these ores to be treated at very low cost, making them attractive exploration targets. Their potential for economic occurrences and exploitation in Sinai should be pursued. 81
  82. ReferencesEl Shazly, E.M., Farag, I.A.M., and Bassyouni, F.A., 1965, Contribution to the geology and mineralization of Abu Swayel area, Eastern Desert. Part I—Geology of Abu Swayel area: Egyptian Journal of Geology, 9, 45-67. El Shazly, E.M., Farag, I.A.M., and Bassyouni, F.A., 1969, Contribution to the geology and mineralization of Abu Swayel area, Eastern desert. Part Il—Abu Swayel copper-nickel deposit: Egyptian Journal of Geology 13, 1—15 Helmy, H.M. and Kaindl, R. (1999). Mineralogy and fluid inclusion studies of the Au-Cu quartz veins in the Hamash area, South-Eastern Desert, Egypt. Mineralogy and Petrology 65,69-86 Helmy, H.M., and Mogessie, A. (2001): Gabbro Akarem, Eastern Desert, Egypt: Cu-Ni-PGE mineralization in a concentrically zoned mafic- ultramafic complex. Mineralium Deposita 36, 58-71. Helmy, H.M. & EL Mahallawi, M.M. (2003): Gabbro Akarem mafic–ultramafic complex, Eastern Desert, Egypt: a Late Precambrian analogue of Alaskan-type complexes. Mineral. Petrol. 77, 85-108. Helmy, H. M., Stumpfl, E. F., & Kamel, O. A. (1995). Platinum-group minerals from the metamorphosed Abu Swayel Cu-Ni-PGE deposit, South Eastern Desert, Egypt. Economic Geology and the Bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists, 90(8), 2350-2360. Hilmy, M. E. and Mohsen, M. (1965). Secondary Copper Minerals from West Central Sinai,” Egyptian Journal of Geology, Vol. 9, pp. 1-12. Hilmy, M. E.; Nakhla, F. M.; and Ramsy, M. (1972). Contribution to the Mineralogy, Geochemistry, and Genesis of the Miocene Pb-Zn Deposits in Egypt. Chemie der Erde, Vol. 31, pp. 373-390. Hume, W.F. (1937). Geology of Egypt: The minerals of economic values associated with the intrusive Precambrian igneous rocks. Geologic Survey Egypt 2:689-990. Hussein, A.A.A. (1990). Mineral deposits. In: Said, R. (Ed.), The geology of Egypt. 1990. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam/Brookfield, pp. 511-566. Ivanov, T. G., Hussein, A. A., (1972). Assessment of the mineral potential of the Aswan region. Technical. Report on the geological operations carried out from July 1968 to June 1972. Egyptian Geological Survey, Internal report, No. 68/73. Nassim, G.L., 1943, The thermodynamic metamorphism of the district of Abu Swayel copper mine: Unpublished M. Sc. Thesis, Cairo University, Egypt. Nassim, G.L., 1949, The discovery of nickel in Egypt: Economic Geology, 44, 143-150. Rasmy, A.H., Takla, M.A. & Gad, M.A. (1983): Alteration associated with ore formation at Umm Samiuki, South Eastern Desert, Egypt. Annals Geol. Surv. Egypt 13, 1-21. Searle, DL., Carter, G.S. & Shalaby, I.M. (1976): Mineral exploration at Umm Samiuki. U.N. Tech. Rep. Egypt 72008/3. 82
  83. Follow me on Social Media http://facebook.com/hzharraz http://www.slideshare.net/hzharraz https://www.linkedin.com/in/hassan-harraz-3172b235 83

Notas do Editor

  1. The definition of “Nonsulfide zinc” is a very general term, which comprises a large series of minerals [2-4]. The only minerals of current economic importance are ; the carbonates smithsonite and hydrozincite, and the silicates hemimorphite, willemite, as well as Zn smectite. The economic value of zinc nonsulfide ores is thus dependent not only on the geologic setting of each deposit but also on the specific characteristics of the mineralogical association and the nature of the gangue minerals [4-6].
Anúncio