3. Introduction
Foreign direct investment (FDI) occurs when a firm
invests directly in new facilities to produce and/or market in
a foreign country
Once a firm undertakes FDI it becomes a multinational
enterprise
FDI can be:
greenfield investments - the establishment of a wholly
new operation in a foreign country
acquisitions or mergers with existing firms in the foreign
country
7-3
4. Classroom Performance System
The establishment of a wholly new operation in a foreign
country is called
A) an acquisition
B) a merger
C) a greenfield investment
D) a multinational venture
7-4
5. Foreign Direct Investment
In The World Economy
The flow of FDI refers to the amount of FDI undertaken
over a given time period
The stock of FDI refers to the total accumulated value of
foreign-owned assets at a given time
Outflows of FDI are the flows of FDI out of a country
Inflows of FDI are the flows of FDI into a country
7-5
6. Classroom Performance System
The amount of FDI undertaken over a given time period is
known as
A) the flow of FDI
B) the stock of FDI
C) FDI outflow
D) FDI inflow
7-6
7. Trends In FDI
There has been a marked increase in both the flow and
stock of FDI in the world economy over the last 30 years
FDI has grown more rapidly than world trade and world
output because:
firms still fear the threat of protectionism
the general shift toward democratic political institutions
and free market economies has encouraged FDI
the globalization of the world economy is having a
positive impact on the volume of FDI as firms undertake
FDI to ensure they have a significant presence in many
regions of the world
7-7
9. The Direction Of FDI
Most FDI has historically been directed at the developed
nations of the world, with the United States being a favorite
target
FDI inflows have remained high during the early 2000s
for the United States, and also for the European Union
South, East, and Southeast Asia, and particularly China,
are now seeing an increase of FDI inflows
Latin America is also emerging as an important region for
FDI
7-9
10. The Direction Of FDI
Figure 7.3: FDI Inflows by Region ($ billion), 1995-2006
7-10
11. The Direction Of FDI
Gross fixed capital formation summarizes the total
amount of capital invested in factories, stores, office
buildings, and the like
All else being equal, the greater the capital investment in
an economy, the more favorable its future prospects are
likely to be
So, FDI can be seen as an important source of capital
investment and a determinant of the future growth rate of
an economy
7-11
12. The Direction Of FDI
Figure 7.4: Inward FDI as a % of Gross Fixed Capital
Formation 1992-2005
7-12
13. Classroom Performance System
Most FDI is direct toward
a) developed countries
b) emerging economies
c) the United States
d) China
7-13
14. The Source Of FDI
Since World War II, the U.S. has been the largest source
country for FDI
The United Kingdom, the Netherlands, France, Germany,
and Japan are other important source countries
7-14
15. The Source Of FDI
Figure 7.5: Cumulative FDI Outflows ($ billions), 1998-2005
7-15
16. The Form Of FDI: Acquisitions
Versus Greenfield Investments
Most cross-border investment is in the form of mergers
and acquisitions rather than greenfield investments
Firms prefer to acquire existing assets because:
mergers and acquisitions are quicker to execute than
greenfield investments
it is easier and perhaps less risky for a firm to acquire
desired assets than build them from the ground up
firms believe that they can increase the efficiency of an
acquired unit by transferring capital, technology, or
management skills
7-16
17. The Shift To Services
FDI is shifting away from extractive industries and
manufacturing, and towards services
The shift to services is being driven by:
the general move in many developed countries toward
services
the fact that many services need to be produced where
they are consumed
a liberalization of policies governing FDI in services
the rise of Internet-based global telecommunications
networks
7-17
18. Theories Of Foreign Direct Investment
Why do firms invest rather than use exporting or licensing
to enter foreign markets?
Why do firms from the same industry undertake FDI at
the same time?
How can the pattern of foreign direct investment flows be
explained?
7-18
19. Why Foreign Direct Investment?
Why do firms choose FDI instead of:
exporting - producing goods at home and then shipping
them to the receiving country for sale
or
licensing - granting a foreign entity the right to produce
and sell the firm’s product in return for a royalty fee on
every unit that the foreign entity sells
7-19
20. Why Foreign Direct Investment?
An export strategy can be constrained by transportation
costs and trade barriers
Foreign direct investment may be undertaken as a
response to actual or threatened trade barriers such as
import tariffs or quotas
7-20
21. Why Foreign Direct Investment?
Internalization theory (also known as market imperfections
theory) suggests that licensing has three major drawbacks:
licensing may result in a firm’s giving away valuable
technological know-how to a potential foreign competitor
licensing does not give a firm the tight control over
manufacturing, marketing, and strategy in a foreign country
that may be required to maximize its profitability
a problem arises with licensing when the firm’s
competitive advantage is based not so much on its
products as on the management, marketing, and
manufacturing capabilities that produce those products
7-21
22. The Pattern Of Foreign
Direct Investment
Firms in the same industry often undertake foreign direct
investment around the same time and tend to direct their
investment activities towards certain locations
Knickerbocker looked at the relationship between FDI
and rivalry in oligopolistic industries (industries composed
of a limited number of large firms) and suggested that FDI
flows are a reflection of strategic rivalry between firms in
the global marketplace
The theory can be extended to embrace the concept of
multipoint competition (when two or more enterprises
encounter each other in different regional markets, national
markets, or industries)
7-22
23. The Pattern Of Foreign
Direct Investment
Vernon argued that firms undertake FDI at particular
stages in the life cycle of a product they have pioneered
Firms invest in other advanced countries when local
demand in those countries grows large enough to support
local production, and then shift production to low-cost
developing countries when product standardization and
market saturation give rise to price competition and cost
pressures
Vernon fails to explain why it is profitable for firms to
undertake FDI rather than continuing to export from home
base, or licensing a foreign firm
7-23
24. The Pattern Of Foreign
Direct Investment
According to the eclectic paradigm, in addition to the
various factors discussed earlier, it is important to consider:
location-specific advantages - that arise from using
resource endowments or assets that are tied to a particular
location and that a firm finds valuable to combine with its
own unique assets
and
externalities - knowledge spillovers that occur when
companies in the same industry locate in the same area
7-24
25. Classroom Performance System
Advantages that arise from using resource endowments or
assets that are tied to a particular location and that a firm
finds valuable to combine with its own unique assets are
a) First mover advantages
b) Location advantages
c) Externalities
d) Proprietary advantages
7-25
26. Political Ideology And
Foreign Direct Investment
Ideology toward FDI ranges from a radical stance that is
hostile to all FDI to the non-interventionist principle of free
market economies
Between these two extremes is an approach that might
be called pragmatic nationalism
7-26
27. The Radical View
The radical view traces its roots to Marxist political and
economic theory
It argues that the MNE is an instrument of imperialist
domination and a tool for exploiting host countries to the
exclusive benefit of their capitalist-imperialist home
countries
7-27
28. The Free Market View
According to the free market view, international
production should be distributed among countries
according to the theory of comparative advantage
The free market view has been embraced by a number of
advanced and developing nations, including the United
States, Britain, Chile, and Hong Kong
7-28
29. Pragmatic Nationalism
Pragmatic nationalism suggests that FDI has both
benefits, such as inflows of capital, technology, skills and
jobs, and costs, such as repatriation of profits to the home
country and a negative balance of payments effect
According to this view, FDI should be allowed only if the
benefits outweigh the costs
7-29
30. Shifting Ideology
Recently, there has been a strong shift toward the free
market stance creating:
a surge in FDI worldwide
an increase in the volume of FDI in countries with newly
liberalized regimes
7-30
31. Benefits And Costs Of FDI
Government policy is often shaped by a consideration of
the costs and benefits of FDI
7-31
32. Host-Country Benefits
There are four main benefits of inward FDI for a host
country:
1. resource transfer effects - FDI can make a positive
contribution to a host economy by supplying capital,
technology, and management resources that would
otherwise not be available
2. employment effects - FDI can bring jobs to a host
country that would otherwise not be created there
7-32
33. Host-Country Benefits
3. balance of payments effects - a country’s balance-of-
payments account is a record of a country’s payments to
and receipts from other countries.
The current account is a record of a country’s export and
import of goods and services
Governments typically prefer to see a current account
surplus than a deficit
FDI can help a country to achieve a current account
surplus if the FDI is a substitute for imports of goods and
services, and if the MNE uses a foreign subsidiary to export
goods and services to other countries
7-33
34. Host-Country Benefits
4. effects on competition and economic growth - FDI in the
form of greenfield investment increases the level of
competition in a market, driving down prices and improving
the welfare of consumers
Increased competition can lead to increased productivity
growth, product and process innovation, and greater
economic growth
7-34
35. Classroom Performance System
Benefits of FDI include all of the following except
a) The resource transfer effect
b) The employment effect
c) The balance of payments effect
d) National sovereignty and autonomy
7-35
36. Host-Country Costs
Inward FDI has three main costs:
1. the possible adverse effects of FDI on competition within
the host nation
subsidiaries of foreign MNEs may have greater economic
power than indigenous competitors because they may be
part of a larger international organization
7-36
37. Host-Country Costs
2. adverse effects on the balance of payments
with the initial capital inflows that come with FDI must be
the subsequent outflow of capital as the foreign subsidiary
repatriates earnings to its parent country
when a foreign subsidiary imports a substantial number
of its inputs from abroad, there is a debit on the current
account of the host country’s balance of payments
7-37
38. Host-Country Costs
3. the perceived loss of national sovereignty and autonomy
key decisions that can affect the host country’s economy
will be made by a foreign parent that has no real
commitment to the host country, and over which the host
country’s government has no real control
7-38
39. Home-Country Benefits
The benefits of FDI for the home country include:
the effect on the capital account of the home country’s
balance of payments from the inward flow of foreign
earnings
the employment effects that arise from outward FDI
the gains from learning valuable skills from foreign
markets that can subsequently be transferred back to the
home country
7-39
40. Home-Country Costs
The home country’s balance of payments can suffer:
from the initial capital outflow required to finance the FDI
if the purpose of the FDI is to serve the home market
from a low cost labor location
if the FDI is a substitute for direct exports
Employment may also be negatively affected if the FDI is
a substitute for domestic production
7-40
41. Classroom Performance System
Which of the following is not a cost of outward FDI for host
countries?
a) the initial capital outflow required to finance the FDI
b) when FDI is a substitute for direct exports
c) gains from learning valuable skills from foreign markets
d) the effect on employment is FDI is a substitute for
domestic production
7-41
42. International Trade Theory
And FDI
International trade theory suggests that home country
concerns about the negative economic effects of offshore
production (FDI undertaken to serve the home market) may
not be valid
7-42
44. Home-Country Policies
Governments can encourage and restrict FDI:
To encourage outward FDI, many nations now have
government-backed insurance programs to cover major
types of foreign investment risk
To restrict outward FDI, most countries, including the
United States, limit capital outflows, manipulate tax rules,
or outright prohibit FDI
7-44
45. Host-Country Policies
Governments can encourage or restrict inward FDI
To encourage inward FDI, governments offer incentives
to foreign firms to invest in their countries
Incentives are motivated by a desire to gain from the
resource-transfer and employment effects of FDI, and to
capture FDI away from other potential host countries
To restrict inward FDI, governments use ownership
restraints and performance requirements
7-45
46. International Institutions And
The Liberalization Of FDI
Until the 1990s, there was no consistent involvement by
multinational institutions in the governing of FDI
Today, the World Trade Organization is changing this by
trying to establish a universal set of rules designed to
promote the liberalization of FDI
7-46
47. Implications For Managers
What are the implications of foreign direct investment for
managers?
Managers need to consider what trade theory implies,
and the link between government policy and FDI
7-47
48. The Theory Of FDI
The direction of FDI can be explained through the
location-specific advantages argument associated with
John Dunning
However, it does not explain why FDI is preferable to
exporting or licensing
7-48
49. Government Policy
A host government’s attitude toward FDI is an important
variable in decisions about where to locate foreign
production facilities and where to make a foreign direct
investment
7-49
Notas do Editor
Greenfield operation: Mostly in developing nations Mergers and acquisitions: Quicker to execute Foreign firms have valuable strategic assets Believe they can increase the efficiency of the acquired firm More prevalent in developed nations
The answer is c.
The answer is a.
Country Focus: Foreign Direct Investment in China Summary This feature explores investment opportunities in China. In the late 1970s, China opened its doors to foreign investors. By the mid 2000s, China attracted $60 billion of FDI annually. China’s large population is a magnet for many companies and because high tariffs make it difficult to export to the Chinese market, firms frequently turn to foreign direct investment. However, many companies have found it difficult to conduct business in China, and in recent years investment rates have slowed. In response, the Chinese government, hoping to continue to attract foreign companies has established a number of incentives for would-be investors. The following questions can be used in a discussion. 1. Consider the challenges involved with investing in China. How does China’s political position and economic situation affect its ability to attract foreign direct investment? Discussion Points: Students will probably recognize that while on the surface, China has tremendous market potential, it is still a poor country. Anticipated demand does not always translate into actual demand. In addition, thanks to the country’s lack of a well-developed transportation system, distribution problems continue to exist, particularly outside major urban areas. In addition, the country’s highly regulated environment makes it difficult for companies to conduct business. 2. Discuss China’s efforts to encourage investment in its underdeveloped areas. What effect will investment have on these areas? How can firms prepare for the unique challenges of operating in these areas? Discussion Points: China is making a concerted effort to continue to attract investment, especially in the country’s less developed areas. Recognizing the problems associated with its infrastructure, the country has committed $800 billion to improvements over the next decade. In addition, China is offering preferential tax breaks to countries that invest in more remote areas.
This Figure suggests that FDI has become increasingly important as a source of investment in the world’s economies.
The answer is a.
FDI is more attractive when transportation costs or trade barriers make exporting unattractive. A firm will favor FDI over licensing when it wishes to maintain control over its technological know-how, or over its operations and business strategy, or when the firm’s capabilities are simply not amenable to licensing. With regard to horizontal FDI, market imperfections arise in two circumstances: When there are impediments to the free flow of products between nations which decrease the profitability of exporting relative to FDI and licensing When there are impediments to the sale of know-how which increase the profitability of FDI relative to licensing
FDI is expensive because a firm must bear the costs of establishing production facilities in a foreign country or of acquiring a foreign enterprise. FDI is risky because of the problems associated with doing business in another culture where the rules of the game may be different.
The answer is b.
This position lacked support by the end of the 1980s because of: the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe the poor economic performance of those countries that followed the policy a growing belief by many of these countries that FDI can be an important source of technology and jobs and can stimulate economic growth the strong economic performance of developing countries that embraced capitalism rather than ideology
Management Focus: DP World and the United States Summary This feature explores the reaction to the bid by DP World, a Dubai-based ports operator, to acquire P&O, a British firm that runs a network of global marine terminals. An acquisition of P&O would give DP World management of six U.S. ports. While the Bush administration claimed the acquisition posed no threat to national security, several prominent U.S. Senators raised concerns about the acquisition. Ultimately, DP World pulled out of the deal, but stated that it would look for alternative ways to enter the U.S. market. The following questions can be used in a discussion. Suggested Discussion Questions 1. Do you agree with the senators who raised concerns about the DP World deal? Why or why not? Would your response be different if DP World were a British firm? Discussion Points: This issue will probably generate significant debate among students. At the heart of the issue is whether a company, because of its country of origin, should be denied ownership of something that could be important to a nation’s national security. Some students will probably argue that the U.S. was unjustified in its reaction to the deal, that DP World has a long history of American associations. Students taking this perspective will probably suggest that the U.S. is being prejudiced against the company simply because of its nationality. Other students however, will probably claim that DP World’s role in with American companies to date, has not involved ownership of ports that could be important to the country’s national security. Students in this camp will probably argue that the ports should be owned by American companies, or at least companies from countries that are allies of the United States in order to preserve national security, but definitely not a state-owned company from the Middle East. The implication here is that ownership of the ports would effectively transfer to a foreign government. 2. DP World has vowed to enter the U.S. market in some other way. Why is the U.S. market so important to DP World? What do you think the response of the government might be to another attempt by DP World? Discussion Points: The U.S. market is important to DP World because it is an epicenter of capitalism. Goods from all over the world flow to the United States, and DP World wants to be in a position to capitalize on this. Students will probably agree that should the company make another attempt to gain a foothold in the market, the United States will be reluctant to allow DP World a significant role in the country, especially in major ports.
The answer is d.
The answer is c.
The rationale underlying ownership restraints is twofold: first, foreign firms are often excluded from certain sectors on the grounds of national security or competition second, ownership restraints seem to be based on a belief that local owners can help to maximize the resource transfer and employment benefits of FDI for the host country