Powell vs. alabama power point

H
Hunter Powell
Ms. Washington’s class
       Government

     February 11, 2013
Powell vs. Alabama
“The Scottsboro Boys”
Who are the players in this court
case? Who too the matter to court?
   Plaintiff:
       Charlie Weems, Ozie Powell, Clarence Norris,
        Olen Montgomery, Willie Roberson,
        Haywood Patterson, Andrew (Andy) Wright,
        Leroy (Roy) Wright and Eugene Williams –
        also known as the Scottsboro Boys
       Represented by ACLU Attorney Walter
        Pollack

   Defendant
       State of Alabama
What?
   Nine, young, African American
    men were accused of raping
    two white women while
    traveling on a freight train
       The young men stood trial in
        Scottsboro, AL and were
        convicted of the rape and all
        but one were sentenced to
        death for the crime
       ACLU Attorney Walter Pollack
        appealed their case to the US
        Supreme Court based on the
        Defendants were denied
        adequate legal counsel.
When?
   1931
        March 25, 1931: Defendants were accused of raping two white women on a freight train
        March 30, 1931: Grand jury indicts all 9 “Scottsboro boys”
        April 6-7, 1931: Before Judge A. E. Hawkins, Clarence Norris and Charlie Weems are tried,
         convicted, and sentenced to death.
        April 7-8, 1931: Haywood Patterson is tried, convicted, and sentenced to death.
        April 8-9, 1931: Olen Montgomery, Ozie Powell, Willie Roberson, Eugene Williams, and
         Andy Wright are tried, convicted, and sentenced to death.
        April 9, 1931: The case against Roy Wright, aged 13, ends in a hung jury when 11 jurors
         seek a death sentence, and one votes for life imprisonment.
        June 22, 1931: The executions of the defendants are stayed pending appeal to the
         Alabama Supreme Court.

   1932
        March 24, 1932: The Alabama Supreme Court, voting 6-1, upholds the convictions of
         seven of the defendants, granting Eugene Williams a new trial because he was a juvenile
         at the time of his conviction.
        May 27, 1932: The United States Supreme Court agrees to hear the case.
        November 7, 1932: In Powell v. Alabama, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the
         defendants were denied the right to counsel, which violated their right to due process under
         the Fourteenth Amendment. The cases are remanded to the lower court.
        *The following link contains a full timeline of the events of the “Scottsboro boys”
          http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/scottsboro/timeline/timeline2.html
Where?
   The alleged rape took place on a Southern Railroad freight train.
    The train was stopped in Paint Rock, Alabama by an angry posse.
    Nine young African American young men were arrested for assault.
    Rape charges were later added.

   The case was first heard and convictions handed down to all nine
    young men in Scottsboro, Alabama. Upon waiting for their trials,
    eight of the nine defendants stayed in Kilby Prison.

   The case was appealed to the Alabama Supreme Court. The
    Alabama Supreme Court affirmed seven of the eight convictions,
    and granted thirteen-year-old Eugene Williams a new trial because
    he was a juvenile. The case was returned to the lower court and the
    judge allowed a change of venue, moving the retrials to
    Decatur, Alabama.
Why?
   In the height of the depression and tense racial times in the south, a group of young
    black men were involved in an altercation between some white men while traveling on
    a freight train. All but one of the white men were thrown from the train. Two white
    women remained on the train and accused the black men of rape. One of which later
    recanted her accusations.

   The black men were arrested and were denied consultation with legal representation
    until immediately before the trial. The jury’s in all of the trials consisted of only white
    jurors.

   Throughout the proceedings, none of the “Scottsboro” boys was allowed to contact
    their relatives, who lived out of State. On the day of the trial, an out-of-town attorney
    appeared for the defendants but announced that he could not formally represent
    them. The trial judge called on all the local lawyers present to assume responsibility
    for defending the nine young men, but only one agreed. The two lawyers had no
    opportunity to investigate the case or consult with their “clients.” All nine youths were
    found guilty by four separate juries, despite testimony from doctors who said they
    found no evidence of rape upon examining the women. Eight of the nine men
    received the death penalty. The convictions were appealed through the State courts
    of Alabama, and failing there, went to the Supreme Court.
How?
   The case was first heard in Scottsboro, Alabama in three rushed trials,
    where the defendants received poor legal representation. All but the
    thirteen-year-old Roy Wright were convicted of rape and sentenced to
    death, the common sentence in Alabama at the time for black men
    convicted of raping white women. But with help from the
    American Communist Party, the case was appealed. The
    Alabama Supreme Court affirmed seven of the eight convictions, and
    granted thirteen-year-old Eugene Williams a new trial because he was a
    juvenile. Chief Justice John C. Anderson dissented however, ruling that the
    defendants had been denied an impartial jury, fair trial, fair sentencing, and
    effective counsel.
   The case was returned to the lower court and the judge allowed a change of
    venue, moving the retrials to Decatur, Alabama. Judge Horton was
    appointed. During the retrials, one of the alleged victims admitted fabricating
    the rape story and asserted that none of the Scottsboro Boys touched either
    of the white women. The jury found the defendants guilty, but the judge set
    aside the verdict and granted a new trial. After a new series of trials, the
    verdict was the same: guilty. The cases were ultimately tried three times.
    For the third time a jury—now with one black member—returned a third
    guilty verdict. Charges were finally dropped for four of the nine defendants.
    Sentences for the rest ranged from 75 years to death.
Outcome and Opinions

It is my opinion that these young men were
    wrongly accused and wrongly convicted for a
    crime they did not commit. They were poor,
    illiterate, and a minority. They did not receive fair
    trails nor adequate legal representation. Even
    when one of the witness recanted her
    accusations of rape, the courts still convicted
    them of a crime they did not commit.
Bibliography
   The following links were used in research
    for this project:
       http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottsboro_Boys
       http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/scottsboro/tim
        eline/index.html
       http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/sc
        ottsboro/scottsb.htm
       http://www.infoplease.com/us/supreme-
        court/cases/ar30.html
1 de 10

Recomendados

InstitutoInstituto
InstitutoInstituto Electoral de Michoacán
810 visualizações9 slides
Meghan Kelly Appellate Brief Meghan Kelly Appellate Brief
Meghan Kelly Appellate Brief Meghan Kelly
1.5K visualizações23 slides
Adv. Legal R & W- memoAdv. Legal R & W- memo
Adv. Legal R & W- memoOluwasegun Joseph
2.8K visualizações8 slides
Sit-Ins & Freedom RidersSit-Ins & Freedom Riders
Sit-Ins & Freedom RidersRCB78
3.1K visualizações11 slides
Baker v. carrBaker v. carr
Baker v. carrelizabethcahan
6.3K visualizações6 slides

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Miranda v. arizonaMiranda v. arizona
Miranda v. arizonadrumeo713
3.9K visualizações13 slides
The Political System of the USAThe Political System of the USA
The Political System of the USAIrene_Ermolova
23.4K visualizações10 slides
Mapp v. ohioMapp v. ohio
Mapp v. ohioJ153770
6.3K visualizações8 slides
North Carolina State LegislatureNorth Carolina State Legislature
North Carolina State LegislatureMatthew Caggia
22.8K visualizações12 slides
3. first battle of bull run3. first battle of bull run
3. first battle of bull rundavmfoster
4.5K visualizações14 slides

Mais procurados(14)

Miranda v. arizonaMiranda v. arizona
Miranda v. arizona
drumeo7133.9K visualizações
The Political System of the USAThe Political System of the USA
The Political System of the USA
Irene_Ermolova23.4K visualizações
MODULE 1 FORENSIC CHEMISTRY AND TOXICOLOGY.pptxMODULE 1 FORENSIC CHEMISTRY AND TOXICOLOGY.pptx
MODULE 1 FORENSIC CHEMISTRY AND TOXICOLOGY.pptx
BengieBalingitTois749 visualizações
Mapp v. ohioMapp v. ohio
Mapp v. ohio
J1537706.3K visualizações
North Carolina State LegislatureNorth Carolina State Legislature
North Carolina State Legislature
Matthew Caggia22.8K visualizações
3. first battle of bull run3. first battle of bull run
3. first battle of bull run
davmfoster4.5K visualizações
The Supreme Court of the United StatesThe Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States
City Attorney of San Francisco1.6K visualizações
Criminal Law: IntoxicationCriminal Law: Intoxication
Criminal Law: Intoxication
Kirsty Allison1K visualizações
Missouri GovernmentMissouri Government
Missouri Government
kastenbabe656 visualizações
Dual court systemDual court system
Dual court system
Mark Lushenko19.4K visualizações
The Constitution Of United States of AmericaThe Constitution Of United States of America
The Constitution Of United States of America
Vriksh Panditpautra7.8K visualizações
The American legal system: An overviewThe American legal system: An overview
The American legal system: An overview
Dan Kennedy3.3K visualizações
The freedom ridersThe freedom riders
The freedom riders
cantin38.9K visualizações

Destaque

The civil-rights-movementThe civil-rights-movement
The civil-rights-movementHuong Million
1.8K visualizações34 slides
Scottsboro boysScottsboro boys
Scottsboro boysfrufruninja
2.6K visualizações8 slides
The Scottsboro TrialThe Scottsboro Trial
The Scottsboro Trialbiancaj5
12.5K visualizações11 slides
Plessy vs fergusonPlessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs fergusona152580
1.5K visualizações8 slides
Plessy v ferguson presentationPlessy v ferguson presentation
Plessy v ferguson presentationPreshaylaJames
2K visualizações12 slides
United states  v. nixonUnited states  v. nixon
United states v. nixonxsportz28
4.6K visualizações4 slides

Destaque(8)

The civil-rights-movementThe civil-rights-movement
The civil-rights-movement
Huong Million1.8K visualizações
Scottsboro boysScottsboro boys
Scottsboro boys
frufruninja2.6K visualizações
The Scottsboro TrialThe Scottsboro Trial
The Scottsboro Trial
biancaj512.5K visualizações
Plessy vs fergusonPlessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs ferguson
a1525801.5K visualizações
Plessy v ferguson presentationPlessy v ferguson presentation
Plessy v ferguson presentation
PreshaylaJames2K visualizações
United states  v. nixonUnited states  v. nixon
United states v. nixon
xsportz284.6K visualizações
Plessy v. FergusonPlessy v. Ferguson
Plessy v. Ferguson
mradrian77723.2K visualizações
Plessy vs fergusonPlessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs ferguson
Keri Hays4.5K visualizações

Similar a Powell vs. alabama power point

The Scottsboro Trials The Scottsboro Trials
The Scottsboro Trials rollie14
7.5K visualizações12 slides
Second. ppt2Second. ppt2
Second. ppt2mck2
270 visualizações10 slides
TKM PresentationTKM Presentation
TKM Presentationa a
1.7K visualizações20 slides

Similar a Powell vs. alabama power point(20)

The Scottsboro Trials The Scottsboro Trials
The Scottsboro Trials
rollie147.5K visualizações
Second. ppt2Second. ppt2
Second. ppt2
mck2270 visualizações
TKM PresentationTKM Presentation
TKM Presentation
a a1.7K visualizações
The Tragedy Of The Scottsboro BoysThe Tragedy Of The Scottsboro Boys
The Tragedy Of The Scottsboro Boys
Kelly Doepke3 visualizações
Unfair Treatment During The Scottsboro TrialsUnfair Treatment During The Scottsboro Trials
Unfair Treatment During The Scottsboro Trials
Melissa Luster2 visualizações
Scottsboro Trial AnalysisScottsboro Trial Analysis
Scottsboro Trial Analysis
Jennifer Jones2 visualizações
Scottsboro And MockingbirdScottsboro And Mockingbird
Scottsboro And Mockingbird
tranceking17K visualizações
Salem Witch Trial Vs Scottsboro TrialSalem Witch Trial Vs Scottsboro Trial
Salem Witch Trial Vs Scottsboro Trial
Anna Barrett2 visualizações
Scottsboro boys trial pbsScottsboro boys trial pbs
Scottsboro boys trial pbs
sarahvroom2.1K visualizações
The Scottsboro Boys Case StudyThe Scottsboro Boys Case Study
The Scottsboro Boys Case Study
Amber Rodriguez2 visualizações
Scottsboro Boys Tom Robinson CaseScottsboro Boys Tom Robinson Case
Scottsboro Boys Tom Robinson Case
Michelle Adams4 visualizações
The Scottsboro Boys And The Great DepressionThe Scottsboro Boys And The Great Depression
The Scottsboro Boys And The Great Depression
Brenda Thomas2 visualizações
English PowerpointEnglish Powerpoint
English Powerpoint
mce43987 visualizações
The Scottsboro Trials And Racial PrejudiceThe Scottsboro Trials And Racial Prejudice
The Scottsboro Trials And Racial Prejudice
Josephine Romero3 visualizações
1  Supreme Court Cases Civil Rights  Case Link 1  Supreme Court Cases Civil Rights  Case Link
1 Supreme Court Cases Civil Rights Case Link
MartineMccracken3143 visualizações
1  Supreme Court Cases Civil Rights  Case Link 1  Supreme Court Cases Civil Rights  Case Link
1 Supreme Court Cases Civil Rights Case Link
AbbyWhyte9742 visualizações

Powell vs. alabama power point

  • 1. Hunter Powell Ms. Washington’s class Government February 11, 2013
  • 2. Powell vs. Alabama “The Scottsboro Boys”
  • 3. Who are the players in this court case? Who too the matter to court?  Plaintiff:  Charlie Weems, Ozie Powell, Clarence Norris, Olen Montgomery, Willie Roberson, Haywood Patterson, Andrew (Andy) Wright, Leroy (Roy) Wright and Eugene Williams – also known as the Scottsboro Boys  Represented by ACLU Attorney Walter Pollack  Defendant  State of Alabama
  • 4. What?  Nine, young, African American men were accused of raping two white women while traveling on a freight train  The young men stood trial in Scottsboro, AL and were convicted of the rape and all but one were sentenced to death for the crime  ACLU Attorney Walter Pollack appealed their case to the US Supreme Court based on the Defendants were denied adequate legal counsel.
  • 5. When?  1931  March 25, 1931: Defendants were accused of raping two white women on a freight train  March 30, 1931: Grand jury indicts all 9 “Scottsboro boys”  April 6-7, 1931: Before Judge A. E. Hawkins, Clarence Norris and Charlie Weems are tried, convicted, and sentenced to death.  April 7-8, 1931: Haywood Patterson is tried, convicted, and sentenced to death.  April 8-9, 1931: Olen Montgomery, Ozie Powell, Willie Roberson, Eugene Williams, and Andy Wright are tried, convicted, and sentenced to death.  April 9, 1931: The case against Roy Wright, aged 13, ends in a hung jury when 11 jurors seek a death sentence, and one votes for life imprisonment.  June 22, 1931: The executions of the defendants are stayed pending appeal to the Alabama Supreme Court.  1932  March 24, 1932: The Alabama Supreme Court, voting 6-1, upholds the convictions of seven of the defendants, granting Eugene Williams a new trial because he was a juvenile at the time of his conviction.  May 27, 1932: The United States Supreme Court agrees to hear the case.  November 7, 1932: In Powell v. Alabama, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the defendants were denied the right to counsel, which violated their right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. The cases are remanded to the lower court.  *The following link contains a full timeline of the events of the “Scottsboro boys” http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/scottsboro/timeline/timeline2.html
  • 6. Where?  The alleged rape took place on a Southern Railroad freight train. The train was stopped in Paint Rock, Alabama by an angry posse. Nine young African American young men were arrested for assault. Rape charges were later added.  The case was first heard and convictions handed down to all nine young men in Scottsboro, Alabama. Upon waiting for their trials, eight of the nine defendants stayed in Kilby Prison.  The case was appealed to the Alabama Supreme Court. The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed seven of the eight convictions, and granted thirteen-year-old Eugene Williams a new trial because he was a juvenile. The case was returned to the lower court and the judge allowed a change of venue, moving the retrials to Decatur, Alabama.
  • 7. Why?  In the height of the depression and tense racial times in the south, a group of young black men were involved in an altercation between some white men while traveling on a freight train. All but one of the white men were thrown from the train. Two white women remained on the train and accused the black men of rape. One of which later recanted her accusations.  The black men were arrested and were denied consultation with legal representation until immediately before the trial. The jury’s in all of the trials consisted of only white jurors.  Throughout the proceedings, none of the “Scottsboro” boys was allowed to contact their relatives, who lived out of State. On the day of the trial, an out-of-town attorney appeared for the defendants but announced that he could not formally represent them. The trial judge called on all the local lawyers present to assume responsibility for defending the nine young men, but only one agreed. The two lawyers had no opportunity to investigate the case or consult with their “clients.” All nine youths were found guilty by four separate juries, despite testimony from doctors who said they found no evidence of rape upon examining the women. Eight of the nine men received the death penalty. The convictions were appealed through the State courts of Alabama, and failing there, went to the Supreme Court.
  • 8. How?  The case was first heard in Scottsboro, Alabama in three rushed trials, where the defendants received poor legal representation. All but the thirteen-year-old Roy Wright were convicted of rape and sentenced to death, the common sentence in Alabama at the time for black men convicted of raping white women. But with help from the American Communist Party, the case was appealed. The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed seven of the eight convictions, and granted thirteen-year-old Eugene Williams a new trial because he was a juvenile. Chief Justice John C. Anderson dissented however, ruling that the defendants had been denied an impartial jury, fair trial, fair sentencing, and effective counsel.  The case was returned to the lower court and the judge allowed a change of venue, moving the retrials to Decatur, Alabama. Judge Horton was appointed. During the retrials, one of the alleged victims admitted fabricating the rape story and asserted that none of the Scottsboro Boys touched either of the white women. The jury found the defendants guilty, but the judge set aside the verdict and granted a new trial. After a new series of trials, the verdict was the same: guilty. The cases were ultimately tried three times. For the third time a jury—now with one black member—returned a third guilty verdict. Charges were finally dropped for four of the nine defendants. Sentences for the rest ranged from 75 years to death.
  • 9. Outcome and Opinions It is my opinion that these young men were wrongly accused and wrongly convicted for a crime they did not commit. They were poor, illiterate, and a minority. They did not receive fair trails nor adequate legal representation. Even when one of the witness recanted her accusations of rape, the courts still convicted them of a crime they did not commit.
  • 10. Bibliography  The following links were used in research for this project:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottsboro_Boys  http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/scottsboro/tim eline/index.html  http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/sc ottsboro/scottsb.htm  http://www.infoplease.com/us/supreme- court/cases/ar30.html