This document summarizes Eric Couch's presentation on Google's shift to Enhanced Campaigns and the impact it has had. Some key points include:
- Google introduced Enhanced Campaigns to allow advertisers to more simply manage campaigns across multiple devices, but Eric argues it was really to address declining mobile revenues.
- Device targeting changes like requiring tablets and desktops to be grouped reduced efficiency and control for advertisers.
- Location targeting and bid modifiers within Enhanced Campaigns have provided more flexibility compared to the previous system where campaigns had to be duplicated across many locations and devices.
- While there have been negatives, advertisers need to adapt to the growing importance of mobile and opportunities that
23. DEVICE TARGETING
WE NO LONGER HAVE THE
ABIILITY TO CREATE MOBILE-ONLY
CAMPAIGNS.
INSTEAD, WE HAVE TO USE
BID MODIFIERS.
24. THE MODIFIER PROBLEM
BID MODIFIERS – CHANGE ANY
KEYWORD’S BID BY -80% TO
+300%.
$1.00 BID ON DESKTOP, -50% MOD
ON MOBILE = $.50 BID.
25. THE MODIFIER PROBLEM
BUT IT INTRODUCES
INEFFICIENCIES IN TO THE
ADWORDS SYSTEM.
A $3.00 BID CAN ONLY BE
MODIFIED IN WHOLE PERCENT
INCREMENTS –
A -1% BID = $2.97
A -2% BID = $2.94
26. THE MODIFIER PROBLEM
IF YOU NEED TO BID $2.95,
YOU’RE SCREWED.
BUT WHERE DOES THAT EXTRA
MONEY GO?
33. GOOGLE’S REASONING, PART 2
“WE AND OTHERS IN THE
INDUSTRY SEE THAT USERS’
SEARCH BEHAVIOR ON THESE
LARGER DEVICES IS VERY
SIMILAR, AND LIKEWISE, OVERALL
ADVERTISER PERFORMANCE IS
VERY SIMILAR ACROSS THESE
DEVICES.”
- INSIDE ADWORDS
34. FACT CHECKING GOOGLE
TABLET VS. DESKTOP
ALL ACCOUNTS, PAST 12 MONTHS
(IN SEARCH):
TABLET CONV. RATE =
TABLET COST/CONV. =
19%
14%
35. FACT CHECKING GOOGLE
TABLET VS. DESKTOP
ALL ACCOUNTS, PAST 12 MONTHS
(IN DISPLAY):
TABLET CONV. RATE =
TABLET COST/CONV. =
52%
119%
36. REPETITION FOR EMPHASIS
THE MANDATORY INCLUSION OF
TABLET AND DESKTOP TRAFFIC IS
ANOTHER INSTANCE OF
INEFFICIENCY INTRODUCED BY
ENHANCED CAMPAIGNS.
37. THE NEGATIVE IMPACT
REAL CLIENT:
MOBILE-BASED SOCIAL PLATFORM,
FOCUSED ON LEAD GENERATION
THE PROBLEM:
ENHANCED CAMPAIGNS.
THEY HAVE NO USE FOR DESKTOP
TRAFFIC.
38. THE NEGATIVE IMPACT
THE SOLUTION:
CREATIVE USE OF BID MODIFIERS
TO REDUCE DESKTOP TRAFFIC.
COMPLETE REVISION OF BUSINESS
MODEL.
39. THE POSITIVE IMPACT
REAL CLIENT:
ECOMMERCE CLIENT ADVERTISING
ON DESKTOPS AND TABLETS.
THE PROBLEM:
AD DISAPPROVAL ISSUES COMINGLING WITH A DESIRE TO TRY
MOBILE PPC.
40. THE POSITIVE IMPACT
THE SOLUTION:
ENHANCED CAMPAIGNS.
THE UNEXPECTED MOBILE
TRAFFIC VOLUME DOUBLED
SALES, DOUBLED
SPEND, REDUCED CPA BY 8%.
41. WHAT SHOULD YOU DO?
• MOBILE LANDING PAGES.
• RESPONSIVE DESIGN.
• UNDERSTAND THE MOBILE USER
EXPERIENCE ON YOUR SITE.
• KNOW YOUR METRICS – DO THEY
CONVERT AT THE SAME RATE?
• ROUTINELY CHECK YOUR
MODIFIERS.
42. BEST PRACTICES
AVOID OVER-OPTIMIZATION ON
YOUR MODIFIERS.
YOU’RE ALREADY ADJUSTING BIDS
ON A REGULAR BASIS. (RIGHT?)
ADJUSTING YOUR MODIFIERS
TOO OFTEN CAN LEAD TO
OVERCORRECTION.
43. WHAT SHOULD YOU DO?
IMPOTENTLY FUME OVER THE
MANDATORY INCLUSION OF
TABLET TRAFFIC.
44. WHAT SHOULD YOU DO?
USE MOBILE-PREFERRED ADS.
100% EFFECTIVE AT SEGMENTING
TRAFFIC.
MOBILE AND DESKTOP WILL HAVE
ADS THAT PERFORM DIFFERENTLY.
SMX EAST
2013 HOT
TIP #1
45. THE MORAL OF THE STORY
THERE HAVE BEEN GOOD AND BAD
ASPECTS TO THIS DEVICE
TARGETING CHANGE.
THERE IS A TON OF MOBILE
TRAFFIC OUT THERE.
WE NEED TO BE ON BOARD.
46. THE MORAL OF THE STORY
NEWER GENERATIONS =
MOBILE ADOPTION
DESKTOP ADOPTION
I STILL USE A DESKTOP, SO I
GUESS THAT MEANS I’M OLD NOW.
WHICH I FIND HILARIOUS.
55. LOCATION MODIFIERS
THIS CHANGE ACTUALLY
ENHANCES ADWORDS’
FUNCTIONALITY, INSTEAD OF
REPLACING IT WHOLESALE.
IMAGINE THAT.
56. HOW TO USE LOCATION MODS
USE LOCATION MODIFIERS TO
MINIMIZE AND MAXIMIZE
PERFORMANCE WITHIN A LARGER
GEOGRAPHIC AREA.
EX: + / - MODIFIERS FOR
INVIDIVIDUAL STATES.
SMX EAST
2013 HOT
TIP #2
57. HOW TO USE LOCATION MODS
REAL CLIENT:
LEAD GENERATION FOR HIGH
VALUE INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY
THE PROBLEM:
NEEDS INCREMENTAL LIFT IN U.S.
LEAD VOLUME WITHOUT ANY
INCREASE IN BUDGET OR
CRO.
SMX EAST
2013 HOT
TIP #2
58. HOW TO USE LOCATION MODS
THE SOLUTION:
LOCATION BID MODIFIERS FOR
EACH STATE IN THE U.S.
THE RESULTS:
LEAD VOLUME =
22%
COST PER LEAD =
6%
SMX EAST
2013 HOT
TIP #2
59. WHERE TO START
GOOGLE ANALYTICS.
GOOGLE ADWORDS’
DIMENSIONS TAB.
SMX EAST
2013 HOT
TIP #2
60. WHAT *NOT* TO DO
THE PREVIOUS TACTIC WORKS
BEST FOR LARGE GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS.
THE USE OF MODIFIERS ON AN
ALREADY-SEGMENTED CAMPAIGN
CAN BE HARMFUL.
61. WHAT *NOT* TO DO
REAL CLIENT:
LEAD GENERATION FOR LARGE
EDUCATION CLIENT. MAKES USE
OF 20 MILE RADIUS TARGETING
AROUND CAMPUSES.
THE PROBLEM:
COST PER LEAD UNEXPECTEDLY
ROSE.
62. WHAT *NOT* TO DO
THE SOLUTION:
ANALYSIS SHOWED THAT CPL
ROSE 20% - THE SAME AS THE
RECENTLY-IMPLEMENTED BID
MODIFIER.
THERE WAS NO LIFT IN LEAD
VOLUME. JUST AN INCREASE IN
COST FOR NO GAIN.
63. WHY DID THIS HAPPEN?
IF YOU’RE ALREADY SEGMENTING
CAMPAIGNS BY SMALL
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATIONS,
YOUR BIDS WILL BE NATURALLY
TAILORED TO THAT LOCATION.
A MODIFIER IS POINTLESS HERE!
64. BEST PRACTICES
IF YOU HAVE A NEED TO
SEGEMENT CAMPAIGNS BY
LOCATION, CONTINUE TO DO SO!
•
•
•
•
PHYSICAL LOCATIONS
DELIVERY LIMITATIONS
BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS
UNIQUE DESTINATION URLS
66. GOOGLE’S FAKE REASONING
“WE AND OTHERS IN THE
INDUSTRY SEE THAT USER
SEARCH BEHAVIOR IN THESE
LARGER STATES IS VERY SIMILAR,
AND LIKEWISE, OVERALL
ADVERTISER PERFORMANCE IS
VERY SIMILAR ACROSS THESE
STATES.”
- SOMETHING INSIDE
ADWORDS NEVER SAID.
67. LOCATION MODIFIERS REDUX
THIS CHANGE ACTUALLY
ENHANCES ADWORDS’
FUNCTIONALITY, INSTEAD OF
REPLACING IT WHOLESALE.
SPEAKING OF WHICH…
71. AD GROUP SITELINKS
YOU CAN GET GREAT GAINS OUT
OF USING AD-GROUP LEVEL
SITELINKS.
CONSIDER MAKING AD-GROUP
SPECIFIC LINKS FOR YOUR TOP
PERFORMERS, OR TO SHORE UP
POOR PRODUCTS WITH LINKS
GOING TO A BETTER ONE.
SMX EAST
2013 HOT
TIP #3
72. CALL EXTENSIONS
THEY’VE ALSO BEEN ENHANCED.
PREVIOUSLY, ANY CALL TO THAT
GOOGLE FORWARDING NUMBER =
$$$ CHARGED TO YOU.
73. CALL EXTENSIONS
NOW = ONLY CHARGED FOR A
CLICK-TO-CALL. ON MOBILE.
THEY’RE LITERALLY GIVING
MONEY AWAY.
74. CALL TRACKING
IF YOU TAKE PHONE CALLS, USE
CALL TRACKING.
ATTRIBUTION IS EVERYTHING.
75. CALL TRACKING
REAL CLIENT:
LEAD GENERATION FOR INTERIOR
DESIGN COMPANY.
THE PROBLEM:
A $100 CPL GOAL FOR AN
ACCOUNT WITH A $232 CPL.
THIS SEVERELY LIMITED THE BID
POTENTIAL ON THE ACCOUNT.
76. CALL TRACKING
THE SOLUTION:
CALL TRACKING PROVIDED CALL
CONVERSION ATTRIBUTION AT
THE KEYWORD LEVEL.
PROPER ATTRIBUTION LOWERED
OVERALL CPL TO $97, AND
FACILITATED PROFITABLE
ACCOUNT GROWTH.
77. EC WINNERS AND LOSERS
LOSERS:
DEVICE TARGETING
GOOGLE CREDIBILITY
MY HAIRLINE
78. EC WINNERS AND LOSERS
WINNERS:
LOCATION TARGETING
BING
FACEBOOK
SMALL BUSINESSES
79. NEW ACCOUNT STRUCTURE
REAL CLIENT:
7 CAMPAIGNS
X 30 LOCATIONS
X 3 DEVICES
= 7 CAMPAIGNS
FROM 630 – 7, A 99% REDUCTION.
82. WHO ARE YOU?
ERIC COUCH
SENIOR PPC ACCOUNT MANAGER,
HEAD OF TRAINING
@HANAPIN MARKETING
WRITER @ PPC HERO
www.ppchero.com
@ecouch11
Editor's Notes
This is what we sacrifice to work in PPC.
This is somehow an unimaginable workload.
They’ve effectively halved the number of campaigns to manage by combining mobile and desktop campaigns.
Campaign types = Branded, 3 x Products, Top Performers, Generic Terms, RemarketingLocations = U.S. StatesDevices = Desktop, Tablet, Mobile.
It’s ScroogeMcDuck! Or Larry Page.
They had two problems – the low overall Cost Per Click for Mobile traffic, and the lack of Mobile Buy-In from Mobile Advertisers. Enhanced Campaigns is designed to solve both.
Mobile growth explosion will eclipse desktops by 2015.
Guess where Enhanced Campaigns happened.
This is in-line with our experience – a massive influx of mobile advertising has lead to the 21.5% growth, and Mobile CPCs still aren’t at parity with Desktop CPCs. This has still led to a TON of profit for Google.
Source: What One Million Dollars in Spend Has Taught Us About Enhanced Campaigns, PPC Hero.I can imagine you SEO folks out in the crowd thinking to yourselves “Oh, you mean your business was disrupted by a seemingly arbitrary and harmful Google policy change? WOW, I REALLY FEEL FOR YOU. I have nightmares about Pandas and Penguins now, pal.” To you I say… sh, sh, shut up.
Previous 30 Day Average for this account: $1.45 Avg. CPC, now up to $1.89. 1.33 Average Position, up to a 1.5.
T
All of a sudden, we now lack the fine-tuned control to which we’ve been accustomed.
All of a sudden, we now lack the fine-tuned control to which we’ve been accustomed.
All of a sudden, we now lack the fine-tuned control to which we’ve been accustomed.
This was a sizable increase – $100k in spend grown to $200k in one change, 2500 sales grown to 5,000. This change was responsible for generating $650,000 of 1.25 million in revenue over the past six months.
Mobile landing pages were directly responsible for the success we found in the mobile space. It doesn’t necessarily have to be a responsive design, but it helps. Speaking of responsive design, this was part of the issue with the Enhanced Campaigns rollout. Four months is far too short a time span to expect advertisers to create a responsive design landing page. Know how mobile looks on your site, and *especially* how your cart performs.
Mobile landing pages were directly responsible for the success we found in the mobile space. It doesn’t necessarily have to be a responsive design, but it helps. Speaking of responsive design, this was part of the issue with the Enhanced Campaigns rollout. Four months is far too short a time span to expect advertisers to create a responsive design landing page. Know how mobile looks on your site, and *especially* how your cart performs.
Or maybe this one is just for me.
They’re 100% effective *if* you don’t use Optimize for Conversions as your ad rotation setting.
Remember, mobile will eclipse desktop traffic by 2015!
Because I still play a *ton* of video games…
And routinely watch cartoons.
This is somehow an unimaginable workload.
With the removal of device segmentation, our account structure has become less complicated. But 210 is still a lot of campaigns. What else can we do?
With the removal of device segmentation, our account structure has become less complicated. But 210 is still a lot of campaigns. What else can we do?
We’re now back down to our seven original campaigns again, with the capacity to maximize performance by location. And device… I guess.
Note: Doesn’t provide conversion data in this interface, which seems like a pretty major oversight.
Can you even imagine what that might be like?
California and Texas. Exactly alike.
Explain how they used to work, and how this is different & better.
An interesting fact: people don’t actually click on Sitelinks. It’s the increase in Search Engine Results Page real estate that provides the value. In that industrial lead generation account, the addition of sitelinks increased overall clickthrough rate from 1.16% to 1.90% - a lift of 64%. The actual links, though? They have a 0.14% CTR compared to a 3.49% for the ad headline.
Almost no downside to using Call Extensions, especially if you can use…
Ironically, Google *is* correct that we’re living in a multi-device world. Their solution just didn’t do anything to address the attribution issues that can arise with the inclusion of mobile traffic. Like Call Tracking.
Bing – explain their outlook on Enhanced Campaigns. Facebook – explain their lower CPCs and refined targeting, with the caveat of being a nightmare to manage.
Less complex in the total campaign volume, but potentially more complex in terms of bid control. But it becomes much more manageable for a small business owner.