1. Te Hurihanga Youth Offending Pilot Programme: A Preliminary Look at Progress Indicators Maria Ludbrook Clinical Leader, Te Hurihanga Dr Richard Etheredge Programme Psychologist, Te Hurihanga Dave Robertson Clinical Director, Youth Horizons Trust

2. What is it? Therapeutic and Bicultural Pilot Youth Horizons Provider Ministry of Justice Funder Raukura Waikato Iwi Partner

5. Adaptation of the Good Lives Model Harakeke Model Self control Spirituality Rangatahi Relationships Whanau Wellbeing Wairuatanga Whanaungatanga Aroha Manaakitanga Community Mastery

11. Te Hurihanga: Therapeutic Home Non-secure, 8-bed, residence: Hamilton.

12. Who has entered to date? Ethnicity    17 6% 6% 6% 6% 24% 41% 88%   16  15  14  13   12   11   10     09   08  07   06   05  04   03  02  01 Aust. Tahitian Chinese Samoan Cook Is. M. NZ Euro. NZ Maaori YOUTH

13. Who has entered to date? 20 youth: Data from first 17 *7 of 8 youth tested from youths number 10 to 17; the 8 th youth is predicted to marginally lift statistics. Testing all youth from number 10 onwards. Seriousness Rating Cum. av. adult sentence length 1412 days 291 to 4505 days Verbal Comprehension 8:6 - 12:10 years age equiv. (7:10 - 8:10) to (13:10 - >16:10) Verbal Comprehension 75 63 to 102 Borderline Ext. low to Av. FSIQ 73 68 to 98 Borderline Ext. low to Av. Cog. Func: N=7* Median: Range: Qual. Median: Qual. Range: Versatility (charged) Moderate Low to High Seriousness Rating Maximum 218 days 92 to 1119 days Max Seriousness Moderate Low to High Prior Offences 22 6 to 48 Offending: N=17 Median: Range:

14. Who has entered to date? Table: Pre-Intake Mental Health or Health-related Concern N =17 12 % Anxiety Symptoms 6 % Other Mental Health Symptoms 12 % Physical Illness or Disability 24 % Trauma Symptoms 12 % Other Non-Accidental Self Injury (No Suicide Intent) 41 % Suicide Ideation, Intent, or Attempt 12 % Depression 88 % Drug and/or Alcohol Misuse 41 % Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 100 % Conduct Disorder

15. Who has entered to date? Table: Pre-Intake Family Circumstances N = 17 53 % Youth Residential (Bail or Sentence) 65 % Youth Out of home placement 59 % Family A & D 70 % Family Convictions (parent/elder sibling) 100 % Inconsistent Parenting 100 % Inadequate Parental Supervision 88 % Notification to CYF 100 % Domestic Violence

17. Number of Offences (Pre, During, Post) Figure: The number of offences committed by each youth pre-, during-, and post programme.

18. Rates of Offending (Pre, During, Post) Figure: The rate of offending, given as an average number of offences per month, for each youth pre-, during-, and post programme.

19. Rate of Charged Offending: End of Year 2 of Pilot Rate of Offending: Average Number of Offences per Month 0 0 N = 5 0.4 0 – 1.6 N = 5 0.1 0 – 0.5 N = 5 0 0 – 0 N = 5 2.3 0.6 – 4.2 N = 5 Av. offences / month: Range: Did Complete Programme: 0.5 0 – 1.9 N = 5 0.7 0.7 N = 1 0.3 0 – 1.1 N = 4 0.5 0 – 1.7 N = 5 1.0 0.25 – 1.9 N = 5 Av. offences / month: Range: Did Not Complete Prog: Post-Prog Phase 3 Phase 2 Phase 1 Pre-Prog

20. Severity Offending (Pre, During, Post) Figure: The highest severity category for offending for each youth pre-, during-, and post programme. NB: Severity ratings are based on Dept of Corrections Scale.

22. Youth Level of Service / Case Management Inventory 20% 0% Risk Estimate Unchanged 40% 0% Risk Estimate Increased 40% 100% Risk Estimate Reduced Programme Early Exit Programme Completers Percentage of Youth Whose YLS/CMI Total Score Reduced Versus Increased; Differentiated by Completion of the Programme. 3% reduction in risk factors endorsed 24% reduction in risk factors endorsed Average Change: Programme Early Exit Programme Completers Average Change in YLS/CMI Total Score as a Percentage of The Maximum Score.

23. Youth Level of Service / Case Management Inventory 70% of risk factors endorsed 50 to 86% 46% of risk factors endorsed 33 to 62% Exit: Average: Range: 64% of risk factors endorsed 64 to 64% (Only one youth) 49% of risk factors endorsed 40 to 71% End of Phase 2: Average: Range: 73% of risk factors endorsed 60 to 81% 70% of risk factors endorsed 64 to 74% Intake: Average: Range: Programme Early Exit Programme Completers Average and Range of YLS/CMI Total Scores, as a Percentage of The Maximum Risk Rating, at Intake, End of Phase 2, and Exit.

24. Risk for Re-offending Estimate Using YLS/CMI for Completers and Current Participants Figure: Plot of YLS/CMI Total Scores expressed as a percentage of maximum score possible. Scores at intake, end of Phase 2, and completion for youth who had completed programme NB: YLS/CMI = Youth Level of Service /Case Management Inventory.

25. Risk for Re-offending Estimate Using YLS/CMI for Early Exits Figure: Plot of YLS/CMI Total Scores expressed as a percentage of maximum score possible. Scores at intake, end of Phase 2, and at exit for youth who had prematurely exited programme NB: YLS/CMI = Youth Level of Service /Case Management Inventory.

26. NB: Youth Level of Service / Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI) Reduction in Risk Estimate as a Percentage of Maximum Risk Using YLS/CMI

27. YLS/CMI: Figure: Programme completers: Proportional contributions to total YLS/CMI change by risk area. Total change was a reduction in endorsed risk factors by 24% of available factors.

28. YLS/CMI: Figure: Programme Early Exiters: Proportional contributions to total YLS/CMI change by risk area. Total change was a reduction in endorsed risk factors by 3% of available factors.

29. Te Hurihanga ‘ Turning Point’

30. Appendices

31. Completers: Single Case Offending Per Month

32. Completers: Single Case Offending Per Month

33. Completers: Single Case Offending Per Month

34. Current Participants: Offending Per Month

35. Current Participants: Offending Per Month

36. Current Participants: Offending Per Month

37. Current Participants: Offending Per Month

38. Early Exits: Offending Per Month

39. Early Exits: Offending Per Month

40. Early Exits: Offending Per Month

41. Te Hurihanga ‘ Turning Point’