GENUINE Babe,Call Girls IN Chhatarpur Delhi | +91-8377877756
ย
Just in time chances for a holistic approach for land and water governance
1. Just in time: Chances for a Holistic
Approach for Land and Water
Governance in Cisadane sub-
Watershed Area, Bogor District
Pretoria, June 2015
Mardha Tillah
2. Menu
โข Introduction
โข Cisadane Watershed
โข Policies on watershed management
โข RMIโs project on River and Biodiversity Conservation and the link to
Childโs Rights
โข RMIโs involvement on the forum
โข The MDM
โข Scenarios
โข Benefits of having the multistakeholder forum
โข Benefits of conducting a holistic approach
โข Before and After
โข The latest situation
โข Challenges to be further addressed
โข Conclusion
4. โข RMI-the Indonesian Institute for Forest and
Environment
โข Vision: Manifested peopleโs (women and
men) sovereignty over land and natural
resources
1. Introduction
5. Environmental
Education since
1992, including on
riverโs health and
biodiversity since
2004
Peasantsโ and
Indigenous
communityโs
empowerment on
their rights over
land and natural
resources since
1998
Rural young
peopleโs
empowerment
through
environmental
education since
2009
11. 3. Policies on Watershed
Management
โข Governmental Law on Watershed Forum (2012): Cisadane
Watershed Multistakeholders Forum
โข Directorate Generalโs of Land Rehabilitation and Social
Forestry Law of Ministry of Forestry on Micro-scale
Watershed Management Model (2009): The MDM
โ Consisted of 1-3 river orders, up to 5,000 hectares
โ Complimented with the Multistakeholders Forum
12. Objectives of the MDM
1. To provide a media for holistic watershed development model in
micro level that involve various stakeholders in participatory
manner
2. To achieve a sustainable model of natural resources governance
based on local condition of various factors (i.e. biophysical,
social, economic, cultural)
3. To obtain data and information about watershed management that
are effective with tangible impacts on biophysical, social, economic
and institutional to be replicate in bigger scale
(Directorate Generalโs Land Rehabilitation and Social Forestry Law of
Ministry of Forestry on Micro-scale Watershed Management Model,
2009)
13. Supporting Policies
โข On Social Forestry
โข On Joint Regulation of 4 Ministries on
Conflict Resolution in Forest Area
โข On Agrarian ReformโLand Redistribution
โข On Collective land ownership certificate
โข Etc
โข Policies on Water Mgt?
Ministryof
Environment
andForestry
Ministry of Public
Works
Min. of Home
Affairs
Min.of
AgrarianIssues
andSpatial
Planning
Corruption
Eradication
Commission
14. 4. RMIโs Projects on River and biodiversity
conservation and the link to childโs rights
2009-2011
โขRural youth
empowerment on
biodiversity and river
conservation issues
โขRural youth is under-
researched (Valentine,
Skelton and Chambers
1998); Rural youth is
overlooked in the society
and in academic (Philo
1992)โDeskilled youth
(White, 2012, 2014, Katz,
2004)
2012-2015
โขOur Rivers Our Life
(OROL) Campaign II
โขCisadane River
Expedition (Upstream
Area)
2014-2016
โขEcotourism-based
Kampung development
River is an
indicator of land
useโwhich
linked with land
ownership
status
15. 5. The Cisadane Hulu MDM
โข 1,770 hectares: 1000 hectares inside the
claim of Gede Pangrango National Park
area
โ Inhabited by about 1,000 people
โ Immediate discussions on land ownership
status
18. 6. RMIโs Involvement in the
Forum
2011
โข Being the vice chief
of the MDM Forum
2014
โข Being the facilitator
of the MDM Forum
โข Leading the think
tanks of the forum
20. 8. Benefits of having the
multistakeholders forum
โข Each stakeholder acknowledges other
stakeholdersโ needs and roles in the project
site
โข Better coordination
โข Marginalised people involved in the
decision-making processes.
โข Obtaining more comprehensive data
โ various perspectives
โ โsensitive dataโ
21. 9. Benefits of Conducting a
Holistic Approach
(e.g. watershed management)
โข More opportunities to design a holistic sub-
watershed management plan: e.g. land
rights issues, education issues
โข More flexibilities in designing strategies to
attract stakeholders
22. 10. Before andโฆ
โข Data collecting carried out only by BPDAS
(and sometimes also involve academia)
- Reliability issues
- Absence of gender perspectives
- Absence of youth involvement
- Technocratic approach only; absence of the
humanist approach
- Elite captured
24. The Stakeholders
(Before and After)
Parties Current participation Identified
Governmental agencies 12 26
NGOs 1 3
Community groups 5 (3 peasantsโ groups, 2
youth groups)
14
Private entities 2 9
Universities 2 5
Schools 0 5
25. Programmes (Before and After)
Current Situation Identified
Seedlings and sapling support, but
concentrated
Seedlings and sapling support
Cattle/sheep support, but concentrated Cattle/sheep support
None Education
None Waste Management
None Improvement of infrastructure (e.g. road)
None Communityโs empowerment institution that
also targeted to the marginalised ones (e.g.
economic supports for women, establishing
women groups, schools, empowerment of
farmersโ groups about rights, technical
support on agriculture)
26. 10. The latest situation
Monitoring and Evaluation
Implementation โ Monitoring plan
โข Current position
Planning โ Monitoring plan
โข Current position
Revising the baseline data
27. 11. Challenges to be further
addressed
โข The advancement of common vision
โข Pseudo-representation of community
groups in the forum
โข The liaison function to coordinate the
forum
โข How do we implement the plans after this?
28. 12. Conclusion
โข Personal relationship is a catalisator for
multistakeholders processes
โข It should be prepared for a long-term
process by people who have long-term
vision
โข It is more than agriculture, water and land