13. • An alternative strategy:
use of an inhaler containing a combination of an inhaled
glucocorticoid and a fast-onset β2-agonist on an as-needed basis as
reliever therapy.
• takes advantage of patients’ natural behavior
to take reliever therapy when symptomatic.
14. • whether the findings(of SYGMA 1,2 trial) translate to clinical practice
outside the setting of a rigidly controlled trial is unclear.
• not consistent with clinical practice
• Both trials use an inhaler twice a day for 12 months,
but this requirement removed the advantage of a single inhaler for symptom
relief
• both trials required that current therapy be withdrawn during a running
phase to allow for asthma control to worsen
15. • Hypothesis:
as-needed budesonide–formoterol
would be superior to
as-needed SABA
and to
inhaled glucocorticoid maintenance +
as-needed SABA
• open-label clinical trial
(Novel Symbicort Turbuhaler Asthma Reliever Therapy [Novel START])
• as-needed
• adults with mild asthma
16. Trial Design and Oversight
• 52-week, randomized, open-label, parallel group, controlled trial
conducted at 16 trial centers
• AstraZeneca funded the trial
• The protocol was approved by all the relevant ethics committees.
• Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients
• The global sponsor of the trial:
the Medical Research Institute of New Zealand
17. Patients
• 18 to 75 y/o
• diagnosis of asthma
• Inclusion:
• 過去三個月,
Use of a SABA as the sole asthma
therapy
• 但過去一個月內,
每日使用SABA少於兩次
• Exclusion:
• Hospitalization for asthma in the previous
12 months
• smoking history of more than 20 pack-years
• onset of respiratory symptoms after the age
of 40 years with a smoking history of at least
10 pack-years
18. • patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to one of three treatment groups
• Electronic inhaler usage monitors (Adherium) were incorporated
Albuterol 100 μg,
with 2 inhalations from a
pressurized metered-dose
inhaler as needed
budesonide 200 μg,
one inhalation twice daily
+ albuterol 100 μg,
2 inhalations as needed
200 μg of budesonide +
6 μg of formoterol,
1 inhalation as needed
19. Procedures
• Seven trial visits
• Patients were withdrawn:
1. treatment failure if they had 1 severe exacerbation
2. 3 exacerbations separated by at least 7 days
3. unstable asthma that resulted in a change in the treatment assigned to
them
20. Primary Outcome Measure
• primary outcome: annualized rate of asthma exacerbations
• Exacerbation
worsening asthma that resulted in 1 or more of the following:
1. an urgent medical care consultation
e.g., a primary care visit, an emergency department [ED] visit, or hospital admission
2. a prescription of systemic glucocorticoids for any duration
3. or an episode of high β2-agonist use
more than 16 actuations of albuterol or
more than 8 actuations of budesonide–formoterol over the course of 24 hours
21. Secondary Outcome Measures
• number of exacerbations
• time to the first exacerbation
• number of severe exacerbations:
1. Prescription of systemic glucocorticoid for at least 3 days
2. or hospitalization or an ED visit + systemic glucocorticoid
• Score of ACQ-5; FEV1; FENO…etc.
22. Statistical Analysis
• intention-to-treat superiority analysis
• We estimated that with a sample of 225 patients in each treatment
group, the trial would have 80% power to detect a difference of 0.3
exacerbations per patient per year
27. • number of patients withdrawn (because of treatment failure)
in the budesonide–formoterol group
lower than the number in the albuterol group
NOT differ significantly from the budesonide maintenance group
30. Adverse effect
• 1 death
(motor vehicle accident)
in the budesonide–
formoterol group
• 1 death
(suicide)
in the budesonide
maintenance group
31. Discussion
• reducing the risk of severe exacerbations:
• budesonide maintenance superior for asthma symptom control
• asthma symptoms most bothersome maintenance has value
• extends the findings of the double-blind, double-dummy SYGMA trials
to an open-label treatment regimen that reflects real-world practice.
Superior
to
and
32. • Extends the evidence for the efficacy of
as-needed use of budesonide–formoterol
• 為什麼本trial能做出SYGMA 1和2沒看到的,as-needed
budesonide–formoterol和budesonide maintenance兩組
,在降低嚴重發作風險上的差別?
1. avoidance of a double-dummy design
2. use of a single inhaler
3. No requirement for regular inhaler use twice daily
real-world advantages of the regimen
33. • Unexpected observation ?
budesonide maintenance therapy plus as-needed albuterol did NOT appear to
result in a lower number of severe exacerbations than as-needed albuterol.
In the albuterol group, withdrawal because of a change in the
assigned treatment owing to unstable asthma
healthy survivor effect
because of a reduced pool of patients in unstable condition
who could otherwise have gone on to have a severe exacerbation.
34. • The findings of our trial are consistent with evidence regarding the
treatment of moderate and severe asthma
reduction in the median FENO from baseline to month 12
in budesonide maintenance therapy
and as-needed budesonide–formoterol
• airway inflammation as measured by FENO is highly
responsive to inhaled glucocorticoid therapy
35. Limitations
• more frequent scheduled clinic visits than would be expected
• patient awareness of the electronic monitoring of inhaler use
Strengths
• use of validated electronic inhaler monitors
identify otherwise unreported exacerbations that were not severe
• exacerbation rate: 包含episodes of high β2-agonist use
including exacerbations that did not lead the patient to seek urgent care