Who’s the expert around here anyway?”A linguistic-ethnographic investigation into the role of sub-editing at a broadsheet newspaper.
1. “Who’s the expert around here anyway?”
A linguistic-ethnographic investigation into
the role of sub-editing
at a broadsheet newspaper
Astrid Vandendaele (Ghent University) & Prof. dr. Ellen Van Praet
(Ghent University)
September 29, 2013 – Queen Mary’s College, London
6. Accuracy Research
• Charnley 1936; Maier 2005; Meyer, 2004; Fox et al 2009;
Baerns 1999; Breiden 2002; Porlezza et al 2012; Bleyenberg
2013
• Factual errors cited: ‘misquotations’ & ‘inaccurate headlines’
• 1 in 3 articles contains a mistake
• Error rates in newspapers: on the rise
8. Porlezza et al (2012)
Reasons for error, listed by sources:
• Lack of understanding
• Deadline pressure
• Insufficient research
• Confusing events
• Reporter didn’t ask enough questions
• Pressure to get a scoop
• Reporter didn’t ask right questions
• Reporter laziness
• Source provided misinformation
10. • “the forgotten stepchildren of the newsroom” (Vane
1997)
• “a semi-ghost to assist the inarticulate and illiterate” and
• “The unsung heroes who make the words of journalists
look good”
(AJR 2001)
• “While important, reporters are not the key people. Subs
are.” (Quinn 2001)
• “The relationship between reporters and subbers has
always been tense. In most offices a kind of
demilitarized zone exists between the two areas. (…).”
(McKane 2006)
13. “The newsroom is like a football team: the journalists
are the strikers: when they shoot, they score, but when
they miss a goal they will get beaten up by the crowds.
The sub-editors are like the defenders:
they can only get it wrong…” (GM_T_03.12)
“Actually, a sub-editor can but make mistakes.”
(TVM_DM/DS_03.12)
15. PhD
• Focus on the sub-editor - linguistic-ethnographic pov
• Participant observation at Flemish and Dutch broadsheet
• Data: field notes, audio-recordings (storyboard meetings, semi-
structured interviews with sub-editors and journalists), email
correspondence, computer screen shots, articles in different
stages pre and post-sub-editor
16. The sub-editor who is good at his job is “perhaps the nearest
thing to what might be described as the complete
journalist” (Newspaper Subediting Bible, 1982)
Towards a more complete definition of
sub-editing process & the sub-editor
as a genuine ‘newspaperman’ (Gieber 1964)
Towards a better understanding of newsmaking practice,
and the news itself
17. Research Question
How does this layered construction
of expertise take shape,
and what is the sub-editors part in it?
18. Data
• The editorial
• Pilot phase: limited corpus of 10 editorials
• Fieldwork (spring/summer of 2013): internal archive & Mediargus
22. Research Question
How does this layered construction
of expertise take shape,
and what is the sub-editors part in it?
23.
24.
25.
26.
27. Order of interventions in editorial
1) layout editor
2) journalist
3) sub-editor
4) journalist
5) sub-editor
6) layout editor
28.
29.
30.
31. Order of interventions in headline piece
1) journalist
2) ‘Chef Nieuws’ – Current Affairs
3) Layout editor
4) sub-editor
5) layout editor
32. Differences
• (Editorial: one voice less -> pro forma)
1)Editorial: senior sub-editor => consistently the case for the
entire pilot corpus
2)Editorial: different process => layout–driven
33.
34.
35.
36. Concluding Remarks
• the editorial: sub-editor’s part is rather insubstantial: his expertise
was expressed in terms of language, typography and quote
• ‘backbench journalists’ actually take a back seat
•The task of the journalist is different: he takes on part of subber’s
expertise, i.e.
text is made to measure
adds headline himself (and quote, 7 out of 10)
makes sure the right fonts are being used
37. Concluding Remarks
• Journalist of the future: several skill sets, among which those of
the sub-editor
•Are sub-editors the journalists of the future?
38. Thank you very much!
Astrid.Vandendaele@UGent.be
Ellen.VanPraet@UGent.be