O slideshow foi denunciado.
Utilizamos seu perfil e dados de atividades no LinkedIn para personalizar e exibir anúncios mais relevantes. Altere suas preferências de anúncios quando desejar.

AAEEBL2010 web2

1.588 visualizações

Publicada em

Web 2.0 presentation at AAEEBL 2010

Publicada em: Educação
  • Seja o primeiro a comentar

AAEEBL2010 web2

  1. 1. Your Digital Self: Web 2.0 as Personal Learning Environment and E-Portfoliohttp://sites.google.com/site/web2workshop2010<br />Dr. Helen Barrett<br />Researcher & Consultant <br />Electronic Portfolios &Digital Storytelling for Lifelong and Lifewide Learning<br />Assistant Professor, Educational Technology (retired)<br />College of Education<br />University of Alaska Anchorage (1991-2005)<br />
  2. 2. Personal Learning Environment Supports Self-Directed Learning<br />
  3. 3. Web 2.0 is becoming the Personal Learning Environment of the “Net Generation”<br />Learning that is… <br /><ul><li>Social and Participatory
  4. 4. Lifelong and Life Wide
  5. 5. Increasingly Self-Directed
  6. 6. Motivating and Engaging
  7. 7. … and Online!</li></li></ul><li>Personal Learning Environments<br />How do you define your PLE?<br />
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11. Types of E-Portfolio Implementation<br />Working Portfolio<br />The Collection<br />The Digital Archive<br />Repository of Artifacts <br />Reflective Journal(eDOL)<br />Collaboration Space<br />Portfolio as Process-- Workspace (PLE)“shoebox”<br />Presentation Portfolio(s)<br />The “Story” or Narrative<br />Multiple Views (public/private)<br />Varied Audiences(varied permissions)<br />Varied Purposes<br /> Portfolio as Product-- Showcase<br />
  12. 12.
  13. 13. Japanese<br />
  14. 14. Catalan<br />
  15. 15. Spanish<br />
  16. 16. Mandarin<br />
  17. 17. Structure of E-Portfolio Types<br />Portfolio as Process/ Workspace<br />Organization: Chronological – eDOL(Electronic Documentation of Learning – U. of Calgary) Documenting growth over time for both internal and external audiences<br />Primary Purpose: Learning or Reflection<br />Reflection: immediate focus on artifact or learning experience<br />Portfolio as Product/ Showcase<br />Organization: Thematic – Documenting achievement of Standards, Goals or Learning Outcomes for primarily external audiences<br />Primary Purpose: Accountability or Employment or Showcase<br />Reflection: retrospective focus on Standards, Goals or Learning Outcomes (Themes)<br />
  18. 18. Processes<br />Portfolio<br />Collecting<br />Selecting<br />Reflecting<br />Directing<br />Presenting<br />Feedback<br />Technology <br />Archiving<br />Linking/Thinking<br />Digital Storytelling<br /> Collaborating<br /> Publishing<br />Social Networks<br />Connecting(“Friending”)<br />Listening(Reading)<br />Responding(Commenting)<br />Sharing(linking/tagging)<br />
  19. 19. Web 2.0 tag cloud<br />
  20. 20. Recent changes in technology<br />
  21. 21. Web 1.0 vs.Web 2.0<br />DoubleClick<br />Ofoto<br />Akamai<br />mp3.com<br />Britannica Online<br />personal websites<br />domain name speculation<br />page views<br />screen scraping<br />publishing<br />content management systems<br />directories (taxonomy)<br />stickiness<br />Netscape<br />Google AdSense<br />Flickr<br />BitTorrent<br />Napster<br />Wikipedia<br />blogging<br />search engine optimization<br />cost per click<br />web services<br />participation<br />wikis<br />tagging ("folksonomy")<br />syndication<br />Google<br />O'Reilly, T. (2005)<br />
  22. 22. Architectureof InteractionArchitecture of Participation (Web 2.0) <br />allows a<br />Pedagogyof Interaction<br />
  23. 23. Web 2.0 Tools in ePortfolios<br />Portfolio Activities<br />Reflective Journal<br />Immediate feedback<br />Creation/Collection/Storage of artifacts<br />Sharing<br />Collaborative editing<br />Collaborative publishing<br />Web 2.0 tools<br />Blogs<br />Microblogs (Twitter)<br />GoogleDocs, YouTubeDropBox, Box.net<br />Grou.ps, Ning, <br />GoogleDocs, Etherpad, typewith.me, ietherpad<br />Wiki/Google Sites<br />
  24. 24. Web 2.0 deep trends: a revolution in human augmentation<br />Web 2.0 Expo, April 2008: Tim O’Reilly, O’Reilly Media<br />
  25. 25. Wikibook<br />http://en.wikibooks. org/wiki/Web_2.0_and_Emerging _Learning _Technologies<br />
  26. 26. Why Web 2.0?<br />Access from Anywhere!<br />Interactivity!<br />Engagement!<br />Lifelong Skills!<br />Mostly FREE! <br />
  27. 27. All you need is… an <Embed> Code!<br /><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ckcSegrwjkA&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ckcSegrwjkA&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object><br />
  28. 28.
  29. 29. Technologies to Watch<br />One year or less<br />Mobiles<br />Cloud Computing<br />Two to Three Years<br />Geo-Everything<br />The Personal Web<br />Four to Five Years<br />Semantic-Aware Applications<br />Smart Objects<br />
  30. 30. Cloud Computing<br />“The cloud is the term for networked computers that distribute processing power, applications, and large systems among many machines.”<br />disk storage and processing cycles a readily available, cheap commodity<br /> thin-client, web-based applications for image editing, word processing, social networking, and media creation<br />More reliable than desktop storage<br />The Horizon Report, 2009<br />
  31. 31. The Personal Web<br />… computer users are assembling collections of tools, widgets, and services that make it easy to develop and organize dynamic online content. Armed with tools for tagging, aggregating, updating, and keeping track of content, today’s learners create and navigate a web that is increasingly tailored to their own needs and interests: this is the personal web. <br />The Horizon Report, 2009<br />
  32. 32. Social Learning<br />How can we integrate technology use with what we know about social learning and interactivity?<br />
  33. 33. How can you leverage the technologies students own?<br />Accessibility from home computers<br />Connectivity with cell phones<br />
  34. 34. How is social networking impacting technology in education?<br />It is having a huge impact on our social and political world!<br />
  35. 35. A New Cultural Wedge<br />“less calls, more web” mobile phones from 3<br />Emphasis on social networking<br />Online versions of<br />Novels<br />Videos<br />Comics<br />Portfolios?<br />
  36. 36. Web 2.0, an Architecture of Interaction/Collaboration<br />Using Interactive Productivity Tools (GoogleApps: GoogleDocs, GoogleSites)<br />Using Social Networking Strategies<br />(Facebook, Ning, Twitter, Edmodo)<br />
  37. 37. Planning Issues<br />What is your purpose?<br />Software capabilities: allow interaction between faculty and students around learning activities and products<br />
  38. 38. http://sites.google.com/site/web2workshop2010/<br />Advantages<br />Free, often open-source tools on the WWW<br />“Me Publishing (blog and wiki)<br />Shared Writing (GoogleDocs)<br />Web Publishing(Google Sites)<br />Disadvantages<br />May require higher technology competency<br />Mostly not secure websites<br />“Small Pieces, Loosely Joined”<br />
  39. 39. Public Google Tools vs. GoogleApps for Education?<br />Public Google Tools (Gmail account)<br />Google Apps for Education<br />Student owns the account for life (must be over 13)<br />Student has complete control of access<br />FREE for anyone<br />No uploading to Google Video (must use YouTube to embed videos)<br />Start immediately<br />Protected environment (school assigns account)<br />School can control access (limit to members)<br />FREE for education<br />Limited use of Google Video (2 GB)<br />Need some advanced set-up time<br />http://sites.google.com/site/colettecassinelli/proscons<br />
  40. 40. GoogleDocs<br />Advantages<br />Documents, presentations or spreadsheets can be edited<br />Maintains a record of all revisions, with identity of author. <br />Interactivity is maintained through comments and co-authoring. <br />Easily embed presentations into blog. <br />Convert all documents to Microsoft Office or OpenOffice or PDF.<br />Disadvantages<br />Set up own system for managing the feedback on student work. <br />Requires full time high speed Internet access. <br />No attachments, only hyperlinks to documents.<br />
  41. 41. Validating my dissertation research<br />When learning new tools, use familiar tasks<br />When learning new tasks, use familiar tools<br />
  42. 42. Google Sites<br />Advantages<br />Free website builder<br />Easy-to-use <br />Flexibility and creativity in portfolio authoring. <br />Helps students build technology skills. <br />Automatically store pages online. <br />100 MB limit on uploaded attachments<br />Disadvantages<br />Set up own system for managing the feedback on student work.<br />
  43. 43. Google Sites ePortfolios<br />handouts<br />
  44. 44. Page Types in Google Sites<br />Web Page – create your own structure<br />Announcements – blog with RSS feeds<br />File Cabinet – upload files, organize in folders<br />List – simple flat-file data base<br />
  45. 45. Explore Google Sites Capabilities for ePortfolio Requirements<br />File Cabinet page type to upload artifacts<br />Comments for feedback on pages or entries in Announcements page<br />Announcements page type (blog) with RSS feeds<br />List page type as data base<br />Subscribe to page or site changes<br />What’s New in Google Docs? http://www.google.com/google-d-s/whatsnew.html<br />
  46. 46. Attachments in Google Sites<br />More Actions -> Manage Site<br />Shows pages where attachments were added and links<br />(re-use files using hyperlinks – right click and copy link)<br />
  47. 47. Storage Limitations in Google Sites – Apps vs. Sites<br />sites.google.com/site/ account limited to 100 MB of attachments in each Google Site you set up <br />GoogleApps for Education domains with a maximum of 100 GB per domain, assigning accounts for each student<br />Standard GoogleApps account, with your own domain name, for $10 a year, currently allows a maximum of 10GB of attached files in all Sites created under your domain <br />Google's FAQ on Storage in different versions of Google Sites<br />
  48. 48. handouts<br />WordPress/Movable Type ePortfolios<br />
  49. 49. Level 1 - Collection<br />
  50. 50. Level 2: Primary Purpose: Learning/Reflection<br />
  51. 51. Blogs<br />Advantages<br />Quickly, easily create a learning journal, documenting growth over time with entries that are date-stamped. <br />WordPress allows additional pages and sub-pages. <br />Interactivity is maintained through RSS feeds and Comments that can be added.<br />WordPress file limit 3 GB!<br />WordPress blogs can be password-protected.<br />Disadvantages<br />Prescribed order (reverse-chronological) of entries. <br />Does not allow organizing attached files into folders. <br />Limited attachments in Blogger. <br />
  52. 52. Less abouttellingMore about talking!<br />- Julie Hughes, University of Wolverhampton<br />Take advantage of Web 2.0 strategies in learning<br />
  53. 53. Don’t jump tothe final presentation prematurely…<br />Document the learning process over time… through a learning journal.<br />
  54. 54. Review Examples of Scaffolding for Reflection<br />http://sites.google.com/site/reflection4learning<br />
  55. 55. Forms of Assessment<br />Formative Assessments<br />Provides insights for the teacher<br />Assessment FOR Learning<br />Provides insights for the learner<br />Summative Assessments (Assessment OF Learning or Evaluation)<br />Provides insights (and data) for the institution<br />Nick Rate (2008) Assessment for Learning & ePortfolios, NZ Ministry of Ed<br />
  56. 56. Level 3: Primary Purpose: Showcase/Accountability<br />
  57. 57. Wikis<br />Advantages<br />Free (for education) online system. <br />Wikispaces allows 2 GB online storage (PBWorkslimits 50 MB). <br />Page can be edited by approved members.<br />Discussion link on top of every page.<br />Saves draft pages and keeps versions. <br />Allows embedding media and building tables on pages.<br />Disadvantages<br />Does not allow organizing files into folders. <br />Archived version does not save navigation menu.<br />Ads! (Google Sites is a wiki without ads!)<br />
  58. 58. Making ePortfolios Stick<br />Will your students want to use the ePortfolio process after they graduate?<br />
  59. 59. Ali Jafari (2004) “The “Sticky” E-Portfolio System: Tackling Challenges & Identifying Attributes” EDUCAUSE ReviewJuly/August 2004.<br />
  60. 60. Success Factors<br />Successful ePortfolio Project = I + J + K + L + M + N + O, where:I = ease of use J = sustainable business planK = advanced featuresL = robust integrated technologyarchitectureM = lifelong supportN = standards and transportability,andO = X (undetermined factors)<br />
  61. 61. Key Qualities of an idea that is made to stick:<br />Simplicity<br />Unexpectedness<br />Concreteness<br />Credibility<br />Emotional<br />Stories<br />
  62. 62. Qualities<br />Simplicity: "How do you strip an idea to its core without turning it into a silly sound bite?"<br />Unexpectedness: "How do you capture people's attention... and hold it?"<br />Concreteness: "How do you help people understand your idea and remember it much later?"<br />Credibility: "How do you get people to believe your idea?"<br />Emotional: "How do you get people to care about your idea?"<br />Stories: "How do you get people to act on your idea?"<br />
  63. 63. Isn’t this Web 2.0 thing just a fad?<br />cognitive surplus<br />Telling about Interview with TV producer<br />looking for the mouse<br />Web 2.0 Expo, April 2008, Clay Shirky<br />Author of the book Here Comes Everybody<br />
  64. 64. Dr. Helen Barrett<br />Researcher & ConsultantElectronic Portfolios & Digital Storytelling for Lifelong and Life Wide Learning<br />eportfolios@mac.com<br />http://electronicportfolios.org/<br />