O slideshow foi denunciado.
Seu SlideShare está sendo baixado. ×

2022_11_11 «Biometrics and Behavior Understanding Technologies for e-Learning Platforms: Challenges and Opportunities». Aythami Morales y Ruth Cobos

Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio
Anúncio

Confira estes a seguir

1 de 38 Anúncio

Mais Conteúdo rRelacionado

Semelhante a 2022_11_11 «Biometrics and Behavior Understanding Technologies for e-Learning Platforms: Challenges and Opportunities». Aythami Morales y Ruth Cobos (20)

Mais de eMadrid network (20)

Anúncio

Mais recentes (20)

2022_11_11 «Biometrics and Behavior Understanding Technologies for e-Learning Platforms: Challenges and Opportunities». Aythami Morales y Ruth Cobos

  1. 1. Learning Analytics Ruth Cobos Biometrics and Behavior Understanding Technologies for e-Learning Platforms: Challenges and Opportunities Ruth Cobos ruth.cobos@uam.es Aythami Morales aythami.morales@uam.es 1
  2. 2. Outline ➢ Motivation ➢ Biometrics and Behaviour Analysis Technologies ➢ Opportunities in e-learning environments ➢ Multimodal Attention Level Estimation ➢ Case Study: ➢ Context: WebApp MOOC & LA System (edX-LIMS) ➢ Experimental Lab & Data Sets ➢ Initial findings & Research questions 2
  3. 3. Motivation 3
  4. 4. Motivation: E-learning Platforms Online Learning • E-learning platforms and virtual education are estimated to grow over a 7% per year between 2018 and 2023, reaching a turnover around 240,000 million dollars. • E-learning platforms allow to capture information to better understand the student behavior and create personalized environments. Market Growth Emotional State Cognitive Activity Increased Security 4
  5. 5. Behavioral Understanding • Action Recognition • Attention Level Estimation • Heart Rate Estimation Biometrics and Behavioral Modelling in e-Learning Platofrms • Keystroke Dynamics • Facial Recognition • Pose Estimation Biometrics 5
  6. 6. Biometrics and Behavior Analysis Technologies 6
  7. 7. Biometrics Traits Taxonomy Physiological - Biological Traits • DNA • EKG, EEG • Odor Behavioral Traits • Speech - Voice • Signature • Handwriting • Gait • Keystroke dynamics • Mouse dynamics • Web-based biometrics Physiological - Morphological Traits • Fingerprints • Face • Infrared facial thermography • Iris • Ear • Retinal scan • Hand & finger geometry • Blood vessel imaging • Body profile & body parts • A. K. Jain, K. Nandakumar and A. Ross, “50 years of biometric research: Accomplishments, challenges, and opportunities,” Pattern Recognition Letters, 79, 80-105, 2016. 7
  8. 8. Biometrics Traits Taxonomy Physiological - Biological Traits • DNA • EKG, EEG • Odor Behavioral Traits • Speech - Voice • Signature • Handwriting • Gait • Keystroke dynamics • Mouse dynamics • Web-based biometrics Physiological - Morphological Traits • Fingerprints • Face • Infrared facial thermography • Iris • Ear • Retinal scan • Hand & finger geometry • Blood vessel imaging • Body profile & body parts • A. K. Jain, K. Nandakumar and A. Ross, “50 years of biometric research: Accomplishments, challenges, and opportunities,” Pattern Recognition Letters, 79, 80-105, 2016. 8 Something WE ARE Something WE DO
  9. 9. History of Biometrics • Evidence suggests fingerprints were used as a personal mark around 500 B.C. • Early Chinese merchants used fingerprints to settle business transactions. • Chinese used fingerprints and footprints to differentiate people. • Early Egyptian uses: • Traders were identified by their physical descriptors. • Differentiate between trusted traders of known reputation and previous successful transactions, and those new to the market. Chauvet cave (France) 9
  10. 10. Biometrics vs. Passwords It is easy to crack passwords because most of them are weak (related to personal details, typical words or sequential numbers). 10
  11. 11. Challenges in Biometric Security Biometrics: • Cannot be lost or forgotten, but must be enrolled. But… many challenges: • Acquisition quality. • Device interoperability. • Variability factors. • Attacks to biometric systems. • Aging. • … many more. • A. K. Jain, K. Nandakumar and A. Ross, “50 years of biometric research: Accomplishments, challenges, and opportunities,” Pattern Recognition Letters, 79, 80-105, 2016. 11 Bad quality samples Sensor interoperability Security attacks Fake samples Aging
  12. 12. Opportunities in e-learning environments 12
  13. 13. Understanding and Modeling Student Interaction J. Hernandez-Ortega, R. Daza, A. Morales, J. Fierrez and J. Ortega-Garcia, “edBB: Biometrics and Behavior for Assessing Remote Education”. Proc. of AAAI Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Education (AI4EDU), New York, NY, USA, February 2020. 13
  14. 14. Face Detection and Recognition: o Continuous monitoring. o Performances over 99% in controlled scenarios. o Privacy ans bias concerns. Pose Estimation: o Behavior analysis. o 3D face modelling from 2D images. o No extra sensors (only webcam). Face Biometrics
  15. 15. Keystroke Identification A. Acien, J.V. Monaco, A. Morales, R. Vera-Rodriguez, J. Fierrez, “TypeNet: Scaling up Keystroke Biometrics,” Proc. of IAPR/IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB), Houston, USA, 2020. A. Morales, A. Acien, J. Fierrez, J.V. Monaco, R. Tolosana, R. Vera-Rodriguez, Javier Ortega-Garcia, “Keystroke Biometrics in Response to Fake News Propagation in a Global Pandemic,” Proc. of IEEE International Workshop on Secure Digital Identity Management (SDIM), Madrid, Spain, 2020. ×7 State of the art (before deep learning) Our current system • Free text • 25 keystrokes events • 168,000 users • 2M examples 15
  16. 16. Modeling Emotional State through Heart Rate J. Hernandez-Ortega, J. Fierrez, A. Morales, D. Diaz, "A Comparative Evaluation of Heart Rate Estimation Methods using Face Videos," Proc. of IEEE Intl. Workshop on Medical Computing (MediComp), Madrid, Spain, 2020. Altered States can be observed in Heart Rate signals 16
  17. 17. Multimodal Attention Level Estimation 17
  18. 18. Attention is all you need • Attention plays a very important role in students' success in the classroom. • Attention allows students to “tune out” unrelated information, background noise, visual distractions, and even their own thoughts. 18
  19. 19. • Since the 70s there are studies that connect the eye blink rate with the cognitive activity like attention: o Lower eye blink rates can be associated to high attention o Higher eye blink rates are related to low attention Attention Level and Blink Rate Daza, R.; Morales, A.; Fierrez, J.; and Tolosana, R. 2020. mEBAL: A Multimodal Database for Eye Blink Detection and Attention Level Estimation. In Proc. Intl. Conf. on Multimodal Interaction, 32–36. However, the potential use of automatic behavior detectors to infer the attention level of users have not been evaluated in realistic scenarios. 19
  20. 20. https://github.com/BiDAlab/mEBAL https://github.com/BiDAlab/edBBdb 58 students performing 8 different tasks categorized in three groups: • Enrollment Form • Writing Questions • Multiple Choice Questions EEG Band Mindwave by NeuroSky Form Logical Problems Crosswords Multiple Choice 15 to 30 minutes Material: Description of mEBAL Database 20
  21. 21. Attention Levels PDF Low and High Attention Level Estimation Probability Density Function of the attention levels in mEBAL We argue that it is possible to predict high/low sustained levels of attention only with data from webcam images. 21
  22. 22. Attention Levels PDF Low Attention High Attention Normal Attention Low and High Attention Level Estimation Probability Density Function of the attention levels in mEBAL 22 We argue that it is possible to predict high/low sustained levels of attention only with data from webcam images.
  23. 23. Attention Level Estimation based on Multimodal Behavior Analysis 23 Webcam (input data) EEG (Groundtruth) SVM High/Low Attention Eye Blink Detector Landmark Detector Head Pose Estimator Face Detector Facial Expressions Model SVM SVM SVM Multimodal Face Analysis Learning Framework
  24. 24. Challenges mEBAL presents examples with variations on illuminations, rich in poses, changes in the distance, etc. The attention level is highly user-dependent. 24 Changes in the Illumination Different Poses and Distances
  25. 25. Unimodal Attention Level Estimation Results 25
  26. 26. Unimodal Attention Level Estimation Results 26 High/Low Blink Rate = Low/High Attention Level R. Daza, A. Morales, J. Fierrez, R. Tolosana, "mEBAL: A Multimodal Database for Eye Blink Detection and Attention Level Estimation", ACM Intl. Conf. on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI), Utrecht, The Netherlands, October 2020.
  27. 27. Multimodal Attention Level Estimation Results 27 High attention periods are easier to recognize than low attention periods. Level of attention and behavior features show a correlation. The multimodal results outperform the unimodal
  28. 28. Multimodal Attention Level Estimation Results 28 High attention periods are easier to recognize than low attention periods. Level of attention and behavior features show a correlation. The multimodal results outperform the unimodal performance
  29. 29. Case Study Learning Analytics + Behavior Analysis 29
  30. 30. 2 • Insuficient feedback • Feeling of insolation • Lack of interactions with instructors MOOC learners Motivation https://www.edx.org/school/uamx
  31. 31. WebApp MOOC “Introduction to Development of Web Applications” ➢ 5-week course, 5 units ➢ Technology to learn: HTML, CSS, Python, JSON, JavaScript and Ajax ➢ Couse contents in multimedia resources, discussion forums and course evaluation activities in form of graded assignments https://www.edx.org/course/introduccion-al-desarrollo-de-aplicaciones-web-2 31
  32. 32. Learning Analytics System: edX-LIMS System for Learning Intervention and its Monitoring for edX MOOCs Cobos, R., Soberón, J. A proposal for Monitoring the Intervention Strategy on the learning of MOOC learners. Learning Analytics Summer Institute Spain 2020, LASI-Spain 2020. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2671/paper07.pdf edX-LIMS MOOC Dashboard Generation Pascual, I., Cobos, R. A proposal for predicting and intervening on MOOC learners’ performance in real time. LASI-Spain 2022. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3238/paper4.pdf 32
  33. 33. EEG Band Smart Watch RGB Camera NIR Camera RGB Camera Screen, sound, keyboard, and mouse capture Experimental Lab - edBB Platform Learner in the MOOC Learner in the Dashboard RGB Camera 33
  34. 34. EEG Band • Attention • Meditation • Blink • Brain waves Smart Watch • Heart Rate • Acceleration • Gyroscope Sound capture NIR Camera RGB Camera Data Sets - edBB Platform Learner Concentration Learner Behavior Learning Context Keyword capture Mouse capture • Press/release • Key Unicode • Press/release • Position in screen • Move • Drag and drop • Mouse wheel spin • Depth • Infrared Screen capture • Color 34
  35. 35. Data Sets – WebApp MOOC & edX-LIMS edX-LIMS MOOC Learner Performance Learner Success Prediction Learner Intercations with the course Learner Intercations with the LA system Knowledge extracted by the LA system Learner Interest Learner Self-Regulation Learner Problems Learner Progress 35 Learner Feedback
  36. 36. While student was writing in a text box where he can give feedback to instructors, it was recorded that he had: • High Attention • Moderate Heart Rate Initial Findings Screen Capture (Video Monitor) Learner Dashboard The Learner was very concentrated on the task of giving the instructors his opinion on the information provided by the dashboard 36
  37. 37. About the MOOC: ➢ What parts of the course can be improved? ➢ Can the course videos be improved? ➢ Can we predict which students are at risk of dropping out? ➢ … About the Learning Analytics System: ➢ Which parts of the Learner Dashboard can be improved? ➢ Are the charts in the Learner Dashboard understandable? ➢ Can the Intervention Strategy be improved? ➢ … Research questions 37
  38. 38. Learning Analytics Ruth Cobos Biometrics and Behavior Understanding Technologies for e-Learning Platforms: Challenges and Opportunities Ruth Cobos ruth.cobos@uam.es Aythami Morales aythami.morales@uam.es 38

×