2. Back injuries in the young athlete are a significant phenomenon,
estimated to occur in 10% to 15% of participants. The prevalence,
however, varies between sports and, in some cases, the specialty
position played.
In gymnastics, the incidence of back injuries is thought to be 11%,
whereas in football linemen, it has been recorded as high as 50%.
2
3. Back injuries include single-episode macrotrauma ("acute") and
repetitive microtrauma ("overuse") injuries. Efforts have been
successful in minimizing catastrophic acute spinal injuries in contact
sports, such as football, hockey, and rugby, through rule changes
and equipment modification.
Noakes et al. recently reported a 46% reduction in the number of
spinal cord injuries with the avoidance of the high tackle in
schoolboy rugby, in South Africa.
On the other hand, the less dramatic, overuse injuries appear to be
increasing as more young athletes are required to perform repetitive
skills as part of their training programs. What is of concern is that
these overuse back injuries, once present, are difficult to overcome,
and recur in 26% of males and 33% of females.
3
4. Low Back Pain in Athletes
Low back pain (LBP) is an extremely common
symptom in the general population and among
athletes.
Athletes are at greater risk of sustaining a lumber
(lower) spine injury due to physical activity.
Whether the sport is skiing, basketball, football, ice
skating, soccer, running, golf, or tennis, the spine
undergoes a lot of stress, absorption of pressure,
twisting, turning, and even bodily impact.
This strenuous activity puts a strain on the back that
can cause injury to even the finest and most fit
athletes.
4
5. Very Important Talk!! – LBP
A major public health problem
The leading cause of disability for people < 45
2nd leading cause for physician visits
3rd most common cause for surgical procedures
5th most common reason for hospitalizations
Lifetime prevalence: 49%–80%
5
6. Incidence of Low Back Pain
Mechanical LBP is very common, affecting between 70 and 85% of
American adults at some point during their lives.
In 90% of patients, LBP resolves within 6 weeks (self limited). In
another 5% of patients, the pain resolves by 12 weeks after initiation.
Less than 1% of back pain is due to "serious" spinal disease (e.g.,
tumor, infection). Less than 1% of back pain stems from
inflammatory disease (rheumatologic work-up and treatment
required). Less than 5% of back pain is true nerve root pain.
6
7. Most patients with LBP have one or more of four symptoms:
1. Back pain.
2. Leg pain.
3. Neurologic symptoms.
4. Spinal deformity.
Jensen and coworkers (1994) found that 64% of asymptomatic
individualswho underwent an MRI had "abnormal” appearing
lumbar discs at some level.
7
8. Almost all of us (70 to 85%) will develop LBP at some point. For this
reason, it is inappropriate for physicians to tell patients that LBP
results from being obese, inactive, or other factors.
Workplace and social factors were by far the most powerful
influences on chronicity (84% accurate in predicting who will be
chronically disabled). These were more predictive than type of
injury, health behavior, or other factors.
8
9. Back injuries involving lost work
11%
7%
12%
70%
Lumbar
Thoracic
Cervical
Unspecified
The majority of
back injuries
that result in lost
work time
involve the
lumbar region.
10. Risk Factors for Chronicity of Low
Back Pain
Previous history of LBP
Significant work loss (due to LBP) in past year
low job satisfaction
Adversarial medicolegal proceedings
Radiating leg pain
Reduced SLR (positive test)
Signs of nerve root involvement
Decrease performance of athlete
10
11. Reduced trunk muscle strength and endurance
Poor physical fitness
Self-rated poor health
Heavy smoking
Psychological distress and depressive symptoms
Disproportionate illness behavior
Personal problems-alcohol, marital, financial.
11
12. Risk factors associated with Low
Back Pain
Risk factor Evidence
Age Increased risk until age 50, then
relative risk decreases in men but
increase in women
Gender Multiparous women: three times
risk
Obesity Unclear
Height Unclear
Posture No association with lordosis and
Leg Length Discrepancy
Smoking Strong association with LBP and
sciatica
12
13. Risk factor Evidence
Physical work Increased risk in those whose work involves bending,
twisting or heavy physical labor
Increased risk of LBP and sciatica with exposure to
vibration
Coal miners have fewer disk protrusions than other
occupations
Low risk of LBP in farmers
Sedentary occupation Increased risk when seated
Driving a motor car may cause LBP or herniated disc
Job involving all standing or all sitting show higher
incidence of LBP than those with changing position
Increased fitness Some evidence that good isometric endurance of
back muscles may be associated with reduced LBP
Psychological factors Stress, anxiety, depression associated with work-related
LBP.
13
15. Causes of Low Back Pain
Common
Non osseous injury
Intervertebral disc
Apophysecal joint
Spondylolysis
SIJ injury or inflammation
Paravertebral and gluteal muscle trigger
points
Hip joint pathology
15
17. Not to be missed
Malignancy
Primary
Metastatic
Osteoid osteoma
Multiple myeloma
Severe osteoporosis
17
18. Evaluation of Patients with Low
Back Pain
A through history and examination allows an accurate working
diagnosis to be made in 90% of patients with LBP.
General History (Demographic Information)
History of Present Illness
Medical History
Family History
Social History
18
19. Physical examination of lower back
Observation and palpation
Gait
Range of motion of lower back and hip joints
Hip FABER examination
Muscle Strength
Tendon Reflexes, Pathologic Reflexes
Sensory Testing
19
25. Classify patient
Determine cause of problem
Postural
Inflammation of soft tissues
Dysfunctional
Adaptive Shortening
Strain or Sprain
Derangement
Disk
Facet joint
Stress Fracture
25
26. Sprain/Strain Dysfunction/
Postural
Derangement
ONSET Sudden,
simple move
Gradual Sudden,
simple move
PAIN Severe ache,
diffuse, spasm
Ache,
intermittent
Sharp,
burning,
Localized or
Radiating
MOBILITY Reduced,
movement
increases pain
Reduced
mobility of
joint and
stiffness
Guarded
flexion,
extension
decreases
pain
GOALS OF
TX
Decrease pain
Decrease
spasm
Restore ROM
Decrease pain
Increase ROM
Posture
Strength/Flex
Decrease pain
Centralize disc
Prevention
Guide to Lumbar Spine Conditions
26
27. Lumbar Spine Conditions
Low Back Muscle Strain
Acute (Overextension) and Chronic (Faulty posture)
Facet Joint Dysfunction
Dislocation or Subluxation (Acute or Chronic)
Low Back fracture
Compression, Stress, or Spinous and Transverse
Processes
Herniated Disc
Protrusion, Prolapse, Extrusion, and Sequestration
Local and Radiating Pain
Classic term “Sciatica”
27
28. Lumbar Spine Conditions
Spondylolysis
Unilateral defect in the pars interarticularis
Spondylolisthesis
Bilateral defect in the pars interarticularis which causes forward
displacement of vertebra.
Spina Bifida Occulta
Congenital condition – spinal cord is exposed = delays in development.
28
30. Diagnosing LBA
The most common cause of low back pain is when one or more
muscles “forget” to relax. We call this a somatic dysfunction.
In somatic dysfunction, some muscles become overactive
(“spasm”) and other muscles become inactive.
30
31. Ankylosing spondylitis
Ankylosing spondylitis is one of many forms of inflammatory arthritis,
the most common of which is rheumatoid arthritis. Ankylosing
spondylitis primarily causes inflammation of the joints between the
vertebrae of your spine and the joints between your spine and pelvis
(sacroiliac joints).
31
32. Unique risk factors for athletes
High impact trauma:
football, rugby
End range loading:
gymnastics, diving
Overuse trauma:
impact loading: distance running
rotational loading: golf, baseball
prolonged sitting: travel
32
33. Assessing the Low Back
On-Field Assessment
PrimarySurvey
ABCs
Level of consciousness/Movement
Neurological system intact?
Secondary Survey
Pain, Dermatomes, Myotomes
ROM – only if no motor or sensory decrements
Further assessment on sidelines
33
34. Assessing the Low Back
Off-Field Assessment
HISTORY!!!!
Observation and Palpation
The Triad of Assessment
Asymmetry, ROM alteration, Tissue texture
Special Tests
Begin to be selective in you choices.
Classify tests as to their main findings
Use results of key tests to determine further testing
34
35. Kinetic Chain
Why do we need to assess the pelvis, hip and lower extremity?
35
36. Foot conditions
Over-pronation
Hip flexion
Anterior pelvic tilt
Pelvic rotation/Tilt
Over-supination
Hip extension
Hip external rotation
Pelvic rotation/tilt
36
41. 1. Vertebral body
2. Spinal cord
3. Conus medullaris
4. Intervertebral disc
5. Filum terminale
(internum)
6. Subarachnoid
space
Lower Third of Spinal Cord, MRI 41
42. Sagittal Section through the Spinal
Cord
1. Intervertebral disc
2. Vertebral body
3. Dura mater
4. Extradural or epidural
space
5. Spinal cord
6. Subarachnoid space
42
43. MANAGEMENT
Non-specific low back pain
NSAIDs and muscle relaxants good for symptomatic relief
Spinal manipulation of limited utility in studies
Should recommend rapid return to normal activities with neither bed
rest nor exercise in the acute period
Bed rest found to not improve and may delay recovery
Exercises not useful in acute phase; use in chronic ( according to
patient response)
Traction, facet joint injections, TENS ineffective or minimallyeffective
Systematic reviews of acupunture have shown little benefit
Massage therapy some promising results
Surgery only effective for sciatica, spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis
43
44. Chronic low back pain
Intensive exercise improves function and reduces pain
Anti-depressants: many with chronic low back pain are also depressed
Maybe for those without depression (tricyclics)
Opiates
showed better effect on pain and mood than NSAIDs
No improvement in activity
Significant side effects: drowsiness, constipation, nausea
Referral to multidisciplinary pain center
Cognitive-behavioural therapy, education, exercises
Surgical procedures rarely helpful
44
46. Bed rest Recommendations for the Treatment of Low
Back Pain
Royal College of General Practice Guidelines
Conclusions
For acute or recurrent LBP with or without referred leg pain, bedrest for 2-7 days
is worse than placebo or ordinary activity. It is not as effective as the alternative
treatments to which it has been compared for relief of pain, rate of recovery,
return to daily activities,and days lost from work.
Prolonged bedrest may lead to debilitation, chronic disability, and increasing
difficultyin rehabilitation.
Advice to continue ordinary activity can give equivalent or faster
symptomatic recovery from the acute attack, and lead to less chronic disability
and less time off work than "traditional" medical treatment With analgesics as
required, adviceto rest, and let pain be your guide for return to normal activity.
Graded reactivation over a short period of days or a few weeks, combined with
behavioral management of pain, makes little difference to the rate of initial
recovery of pain and disability,but leads to less chronic disabilityand work loss.
Advice to return to normal work within a planned short time may lead to shorter
periods of work loss and less timeoff work.
46
47. Recommendations
Do not recommend or use bedrest as a treatment for simple back
pain.
Some patients may be confined to bed for a few days as a
consequence of their pain but this should not be considered a
treatment.
Advise patients to stay as active as possible and to continue normal
daily activities.
Advise patients to increase their physical activities progressively over
a few days or weeks.
If a patient is working, then advice to stay at work or return to work
as soon as possible is probably beneficial.
47
48. Physical Therapy Approaches in
Low Back Pain:-
In patients with LBP and concomitant radiating leg pain, McKenzie
(1981) has described a clinical phenomenon known as
"centralization“.
During McKenzie's procedure, a change in pain location from
peripheral (or distal) to a more proximal (or central) location is
desired during the mechanical assessment and manipulative
evaluation.
Determination of the initial movement pattern to be used by the
therapist is based on presumed pathology (e.g., discogenic versus
posterior element pain), pain pat tern, and successful pain
centralization.
48
49. Extension Bias
As a very generalized guideline, the extension bias is most
commonly used with Discogenic pathology; symptoms decrease
with repetitive extension on motion pattern testing and pain
centralizes with extension.
Extension exercises may reduce intradiscal pressure, allowing
anterior migration of the nucleus pulposus away from the area of
pathologic compression.
Extension exercises may actually increase symptoms in patients with
large central disc herniation, foraminal stenosis, or foraminal
herniation.
49
50. Cardiovascular fitness may then be initiated with an exercise that
employs a neutral to extension bias in these patients to avoid
aggravation of the patient's back pain during aerobic exercise
(e.g., use of aquatic stabilization training or cross-country ski
machine).
50
51. Flexion Bias
Flexion bias is most commonly used in patients with posterior spine
element (e.g., facet) pain. In these patients, symptoms decrease with
repetitive flexion on motion pat tern testing and pain centralizes with
flexion.
Flexion exercises (see later) may act to reduce facet joint compression
and provide stretch to lumbar musculature, ligaments, and myofascial
structures.
Flexion actually increases intradiscal pressure and ex acerbates
discogenic symptoms.
Cardiovascular exercises in patients with posterior spine element pain
may be initiated with stationary bicycling in slight lumbar flexion or
aquatic stabilization exercises in slight lumbar flexion. These activities
place the spine in a neutral to flexion bias.
51
52. Exercise Programs for Low Back
Pain
Several exercise programs have been developed for acute LBP.
These include those designed by McKenzie (mainly extension
exercises) (1981), Williams (1937), Aston (1999), Heller (1991), and
Feldenkrais (Lake 1985), and other lumbar stabilization programs,
stretching regimens, and aerobic conditioning programs.
52
53. McKenzie Technique
Treatment is based on evaluation of pain location and maneuvers
that change the pain location from referred to centralized.
McKenzie recommends implementation of this protocol by a
therapist with specialized training in the McKenzie method to ensure
proper recognition and correct implementation of treatment in
response to the patient's clinical relief derived from specific
maneuvers. To determine which exercises produce centralization,
the physical therapist tests the patient with a standardized series of
lumbar movements, such as flexion, extension, lateral bending,
rotation, and side-gliding (a combination of lateral bending and
rotation).
53
54. Once the therapist identifies the movement (usually extension or
lateral bending) that decreases peripheral symptoms, the patient is
taught to perform an individualized exercise program in that
direction of movement.
The movement is performed repetitively to the passive end-range.
Maneuvers that "peripheralize" or exacerbate symptoms are
discontinued.
This technique is best for Acute Low Back Pain.
54
58. Recumbent End-Range
Movements
Passive extension while prone
Knees-to-chest while supine
Prone lateral shifting of hips off midline (patients with unilateral
symptoms)
Flexion while sitting
58
61. Williams Flexion Exercises
The goals of this isometric flexion regimen, developed in the 1930s,
are to
(1) widen the intervertebral foramina and facet joint to reduce
nerve compression,
(2) stretch hip flexors and back extensors,
(3) strengthen abdominal and gluteal muscles, and
(4) reduce "posterior fixation" of the lumbosacral junction.
61
62. A concern with this method is that certain flexion maneuvers
increase intradiscal pressure, possibly aggravating herniated or
bulging discs. According to Nachemson (1981), Williams' first
exercise increases intradiscal pressure to 210% over that in a
standing posture. Three of the six exercises increase intradiscal
pressure, and these three are contraindicated for patients with
acute herniated disc.
62
64. Lumbar Stabilization Programs
Practitioners with backgrounds in martial arts or sports training and
some therapists with European influences in training developed
stabilization training primarily for these patients.
The main goal of the lumbar stabilization program is to build
musculature that stabilizes the torso, with cocontraction of
abdominal muscles to provide a corseting effect on the lumbar
spine.
This concept is centered on the assumption that an injured lumbar
motion segment may create a weak link in the kinetic chain, with
subsequent predisposition to reinjury.
64
65. Exercise Training in the Lumbar
Stabilization Program
Soft tissue flexibility
Hamstring musculotendinous unit.
Quadriceps musculotendinous unit.
Iliopsoas musculotendinous unit.
Gastrocnemius-soleus musculotendinous unit.
External and internal hip rotators.
65
66. Joint mobility
Lumbar spine segmental mobility
Extension
Flexion (unloaded)
Hip range of motion.
Thoracic segmental mobility.
Stabilization Program
Finding neutral position
Standing
Sitting
Jumping
Prone
66
67. Prone gluteal squeezes
With arm raises
With alternate arm raises
With leg raises
With alternate leg raises
With arm and leg raises
With alternate arm and leg raises
Supine pelvic bracing
Bridging progression
Basic position
One leg raised with ankle weights
Stepping
Balance on gym ball.
67
68. Quadruped
With alternate arm and leg
movements.
Kneeling stabilization
Double knee
Single knee
Lunges, with and without weight
Wall slide quadriceps
strengthening
Position transition with postural
control
Abdominal program
Curl-ups
Dead-bug, supported &
unsupported
Diagonal curl-ups
Diagonal curl-ups on incline board
Straight-leg lowering
68
69. Gym program
Latissimus pull-downs
Angled-leg press
Lunges
Hyperextension bench
General upper body weight
exercises
Aerobic program
Progressive walking
Swimming
Stationary bicycling
Cross-country ski machine
Running- initially supervised on a
treadmill.
69
70. THE CORE
Low back and abdominal exercises are prescribed primarily for
rehabilitation of injured low back
Prevention of injury
As a component of fitness training programs
Goal is to stress both damaged and healthy supporting tissue to
promote tissue repair
while avoiding further excessive loading that can exacerbate existing
structural weakness
ACSM chapter discusses the science of understanding loading forces and
revisits some common practices in abdominal and low back training
Most effective
train motor control system to activate spine stabilizers
Progress to endurance training
Finally enhance strength and flexibility
70
71. 71Core Stability
Stabilizing muscles - act to support muscle action by
providing rigid base of support for movement
Core stability provided by muscles in the torso
connecting the spine, rib cage and pelvis
When standing the pelvis and lumbar spine are
oriented for maximal stability
Goal of training is to maintain this “neutral spine”
orientation throughout dynamic movement
Lumbosacral angle ~ 41 degrees
Stabilizing exercise are ones that groove motor
patterns and ensure a stable spine during activity
72. 72Assessment
Muscular endurance closely related to spinal stability and risk of
low back pain
Balance of muscular endurance among torso flexors, extensors and
lateral musculature is most important in reducing injury risk
All tests evaluated on time to failure and compared to normative
data for overall time and ratios between test scores
Lateral musculature test
Test performed on both sides of the body
Lying in full side bridge, legs extended, top foot in front
subject supported on one elbow and feet while lifting hips off the
floor to create a straight line over their body length
Uninvolved arm placed across the chest with hand on opposite
shoulder
Failure occurs when person loses the straight-back posture and hip
returns to ground
74. 74Assessment
Flexor endurance test
Begins with person in a sit-up posture with the back
resting against a jig angled at 60 degrees
Knees and hips flexed at 90 degrees
Arms folded across chest
Hands on opposite shoulders
Toes are secured by examiner or toe straps
Test begins by pulling support back ten centimeters
Failure occurs when subject falls back and touches jig
76. 76Assessment
Back extensors test
Upper body cantilevered over the end of test bench -
hands across chest
Time to failure - drop from horizontal
78. 78Core Exercise Training
Focus on progressive
exercise that emphasizes
muscle contraction with
the spine in neutral
position
Spine posture determines
interplay between
ligament and muscle
forces
Extensor muscles
activated in neutral
position reducing load on
spine
Fully flexed spine fails at
about 20-40% lower
compressive load than
with neutral position
79. The line of gravity
shifts further ventrally
during relaxed
unsupported sitting
(B) as the pelvis is
tilted backward and
the lumbar lordosis
flattens (this creates
a longer lever arm).
When sitting erect
(C) the pelvic
backward tilt is
reduced and the
lever arm shortens
(still longer than
when standing (A).
79
80. 80Exercise Training
Several exercises are required to train all of the
muscles of the lumbar torso
Individual fitness level, training goals, history of spinal
injury should influence prescription
Exercises should avoid loading spine throughout
ROM post injury
Elite athletes may achieve higher performance
levels by using full ROM in exercises
81. 81Abdominal Bracing and Neutral Spine
Teaching Abdominal bracing
co-contraction of abdominal wall muscles for spinal
stability
1. Demonstrate joint stability in peripheral joint
through flexor/extensor co-contraction
have subject palpate demonstrator then themselves
2. Identify core musculature - cough with hand
above hips - palpate abdominal wall during
contraction
82. 82Abdominal Bracing and Neutral Spine
Teaching Neutral spine
1. lying on back, knees bent - place fingers between
lumbar spine and floor
hyper lordosis - increase gap from floor
hypo lordosis - flatten back onto fingers
Can utilize blood pressure cuff and observe rise and fall in
pressure with same movements.
2. Put subject through lifting exercise or simulated work
situations
Place long stick across lumbar, subject must maintain contact
across lumbar, avoiding trunk flexion throughout motion.
84. 84Core Exercises
All endurance exercises should last up to seven to
eight seconds
Progression in program should come from adding
more repetitions rather than adding duration
Utilize normative data from assessments to develop
client goals
Curl ups reduce spinal compression compared to sit
ups and leg raises
Press heel sit-ups - recent evidence advanced them as
beneficial
However, active hamstrings actually stimulate psoas
activity and higher compressive penalty on spine
85. 85
Abdominal Exercises
Partial Curl ups
Focus on rectus abdominus
Distinct upper and lower rectus abdominus do not exist in most
people
training can be accomplished with a single exercise
Retain neutral spine, do not flatten back to floor
Beginner
Supine with hands supporting lumbar spine
One leg bent at 90 degrees
Lift thoracic and cervical spine as one unit, no cervical motion
should occur (chin poking or chin tucking)
Leave elbows on floor, contract rectus and lift head and shoulders
off the floor
Intermediate
lift elbows slightly off floor
Advanced
place fingers lightly on forehead
Head and neck must move as unit, maintaining rigid block position
on thoracic spine
86. 86
Abdominal Exercises
Horizontal Side bridge
Challenge lateral obliques and quadratus lumborum
Low lumbar compressive load
Variable demand on rectus and others with progressive stages of
exercise
Remedial
Standing 45 degrees and leaning to wall
Lying on floor and raising legs
Utilizeback extensionbench at 45 degrees and support from side
Beginner
Lateral support on knees bent at 90 degrees and elbow, maintain torso
straight
Top arm across chest with hand on shoulder
Intermediate
Legs straight with top foot in front
Variation- incorporatelongitudinal rolling of the torso forward and backward
Advanced
Transfer from one elbow to the other while maintaining abdominal bracing
87. 87
Extensor exercises
Traditional extensor exercises - high spinal loads due to ext applied loads from
weights of resistance machines
bird dog
Remedial
Raise a hand or knee slightly off floor
Beginner
Singleleg raise on hands and knees
Intermediate
Simultaneous contra-lateral arm raise with leg raise - increases extensor challenge
Hold six to eight seconds when parallel
Advanced
Do not rest by placing the hand and knee on the floor after each holding repetition
Sweep the floor with hand and return out
Common errors include hiking hips and not achieving neutral spine
exercise lying prone and lifting legs is contraindicated for anyone at risk for low
back injury due to hyperextension
89. 89Advanced exercises
athletes can incorporate forced breathing cycles into all
exercises
Labile surfaces - exercise ball, wobble boards
Increase co-contraction, doubling spinal load in many exercises
Not recommended until subject has achieved spinal
stability and sufficiently restored load-bearing capacity
Can delay improvements by causing exacerbating spine loads if
adopted early in rehabilitative program
97. 97Advanced exercises
Squat and Power cleans
Great for developing power
Form is more important than weight being lifted as
injury is likely
Europeans, practice technique for years before adding
weight
Recommend beginning from elevated position if
not a competitive weight lifter
McGill recommends athletes use medicine ball in
the same motion pattern to avoid high stress of
lifting bar from ground
98. 98Aerobic exercises
Evidence supporting positive role of aerobic
exercise in reducing incidence of low back
injury and in the treatment of low back patients
Walking
Low levels of support tissue load
Mild, prolonged activation of supporting musculature
Study comparing elderly engaged in a variety
of lifelong activities
Runners - no detrimental changes in low back health
Weightlifters and soccer players - more disc
degeneration and bulges
99. 99Flexibility
Flexibility of the spine has yet to be shown to improve
outcomes of low back exercise programs or reduce risk
of future injury in healthy populations
Flexibility of hip has shown to be important
Avoiding end of ROM during athletic and daily activities
can reduce risk for several types of injuries
Limit training to unloaded flexion/extension
Fig 13.4 cat stretch - full ROM recommended only for
athletes who have never had a back injury
Hip and knee flexibility should be performed with
neutral spine
101. 101
Exercise Prescription
Recommendations
Low back exercise most beneficial if performed daily
No pain, no gain does not apply
Inclusion of general exercise (aerobic) is most effective
Unwise to perform full ROM of spine early in the morning - Disc
more hydrated in morning
Emphasis should be endurance over strength, for low back
health
Training objectives must be identified individually in terms of
injury risk, optimizing health or maximizing athletic performance
May take 3 months to observe increase function and pain
reduction
103. How do I Take Care of My Back ?
Body Mechanics
Proper Lifting Techniques
Exercise
Stretching
Correct Posture
103
104. “It’s not how much you lift or move, but the way you
do it”!
General Rules:
1) Push vs. Pull
2) Keep Work Within “Strike Zone”
3) Keep Load Close To Body
4) Use Abdominal Bracing
5) Pivot with Feet - Avoid Twisting
6) Team Work vs. Mule Work
Body Mechanics
104
105. Power Position:
Wide base of support
Feet shoulder width apart
Back straight
Head and shoulders up
Bend at hips and knees - NOT BACK!
Keep load close to body
Tighten stomach muscles
Use leg, hip and buttock muscles
Breathe out with lift
Proper Lifting Techniques 105
111. The Piriformis muscle arises from the anterior
surface of the sacrum and passes
posterolaterally through the sciatic notch to
insert into the upper border of the greater
trochanter.
The sciatic nerve exits the pelvis through the
sciatic notch and descends immediately in
front of the piriformis muscle.
In 10% of the population, anatomical
variations result in the sciatic nerve passing
through the piriformis muscle. female–to–
male ratio of 6:1.
111
112. Piriformis syndrome was first described in 1947 by Robinson as
a ‘‘type of sciatica which is due to an abnormal condition of
the piriformis muscle, usually traumatic in origin.’’
This particular condition may be considered an entrapment
syndrome.
Although known as the “piriformis syndrome”, this would be
better referred to as “piriformis impingement”.
112
113. Epidemiology and Risk Factors
The incidence rate of piriformis syndrome ranges from 0.33% to
6%, with a female-to-male preponderance ranging from 3:1 to
6:1.
Aside from direct trauma, causative physical activities are
extremes of running, hiking long distances, or climbing.
Each of these activities requires the athlete to perform
numerous, repetitive hip extension maneuvers (e.g., Eco
Challenge, triathlons, marathons, and speed skating).
113
114. Etiology of the piriformis syndrome
Gluteal trauma in the sacroiliac or gluteal areas
Predisposing anatomic variants
Myofascial trigger points
Hypertrophy and spasm of the piriformis muscle
Secondary to laminectomy
Abcess
Hematoma
114
115. Myositis
Bursitis of the piriformismuscle
Neoplasms in the area of the infra piriformis foramen
Colorectal carcinoma
Neuroma of the sciatic nerve
Epi sacroiliac lipoma
Intra gluteal injection
Femoral nailing
Myositis ossificans of the piriformis muscle
115
116. Types of piriformis syndrome
A primary condition that is intrinsic to the piriformis occurs after a
fall in which the individual forcibly strikes the ground while bent
forward or flexed at the torso (e.g., hockey and football players,
gymnasts, and cheerleaders). Primary injury also occurs in a near
fall when the piriformis violently contracts to maintain balance.
A secondary condition includes piriformis irritation caused by SI
joint dysfunction. Because of the piriformis muscle’s unique
orientation and because it is the only muscle to cross the SI joint,
the piriformis plays a large role in SI joint pain. In addition, any
lesion or dysfunction of the SI joint can release inflammatory
cytokines, which induces a paracrine inflammatory response on
the piriformis muscle and its fascia and predisposes to spasm.
116
117. Clinical Features
The cardinal features of this syndrome include a history of trauma to
the SI and gluteal regions;
Regional pain localized to the SI joint, the greater sciatic notch, and
the piriformis muscle that extends down the limb;
Acute exacerbation of pain by stooping and lifting;
A palpable tender myofascial point within the involved piriformis
muscle;
A positive Lasegue sign (straight leg raise) with prolonged hypertonicity
or irritation; and
Gluteal atrophy as a result of compression of the superior and inferior
gluteal nerve(s).
The most notable hallmark of this condition is the development of
sciatic neuritis.
117
118. History
A history of a fall or another related direct trauma to the gluteal
region as well as activities that cause a prolongation o
exacerbation of hip rotation/extension will normally be reported
by the athlete.
Complaints of buttock pain with or without radiation to the
posterior thigh, knee, and calf are usually present.
Hip adduction and internal rotation activities increase the
symptoms as a result of the stretch placed on the piriformis.
Patients may complain of pain while performing either hip
extension and/or flexion as a result of the unique biomechanics
of this muscle. As the hip is flexed, the piriformis contracts, which
aids in the flexion. Likewise, when the hip extends, the piriformis
also contracts, thus assisting with this motion.
118
119. The key clinical characteristic is the complaint of sitting
intolerance because sitting places direct pressure on the
spasming muscle.
In addition, because of the proximity of the piriformis to the
lateral pelvic wall, patients may also complain of
dyspareunia or pain with bowel movements, resulting from
the activation of the pelvic splanchnic nerve.
One major distinction between this condition and other
sciatica-producing conditions (e.g., herniated nucleus
pulposus) is the lack of true radiculopathy in piriformis
syndrome.
119
120. Physical Examination
Physical examination findings that are indicative of piriformis
syndrome include a palpable tender point within the muscle
belly, origin, or insertion.
Painful resisted active external rotation of the hip while seated
and in the fully internally rotated position is considered the most
specific test for differentiating this condition from other causes of
pain.
Patients with a long history of piriformis syndrome may develop
gluteal atrophy as a result of the entrapment of the peritoneal
branch of the sciatic nerve.
This gluteal atrophy is more commonly found in the elder athlete
with a positive Trendelenburg sign and motor weakness along
the S1 myotome.
120
121. On examination, there is tenderness either in the belly of the
piriformis or more distally near its insertion into the greater
trochanter.
Passive internal hip rotation is reduced and resisted abduction with
the hip adducted and flexed may reproduce the pain over the
piriformis.
Pain may also be reported by resisted external rotation with the hip
and knee flexed, beginning from a position of internal rotation so
that end range is tested.
121
122. Investigations
As a result of the associated neural involvement with this
condition, all necessary studies should be performed to rule out
spinal causes of sciatica and SI joint or hip pathology.
Computed tomography (CT) scanning, MRI scanning, and
scintigraphy with technitium- 99m bone scanning rarely
demonstrate any identifiable piriformis abnormality.
However, neurophysiologic testing has proven helpful. The
peritoneal branch of the sciatic nerve and the internal gluteal
nerve may demonstrate signs of denervation from the
compression of a hypertrophied piriformis.
Nerve conduction studies will demonstrate delays in the H
reflexes of these nerves.
122
123. Differential Diagnosis
Dysfunction,lesion and inflammation of sacroiliac joint
Pseudoaneurysm in the inferior gluteal artery following
gynaecologic surgery
Thrombosis of the iliac vein
Painful vascular compression syndrome of the sciatic nerve,
caused by gluteal varicosities
Herniated intervertebraldisc
Post-laminectomy syndrome or coccygodinia
Posterior facet syndrome at L4-5 or L5-S1 Unrecognized pelvic
fractures
Lumbar osteochondrosis
Undiagnosed renal stones
Lumbosacral radiculopathies
123
124. Osteoarthritis (lumbosacral spine)
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction
Degenerative disc disease
Compression fractures
Intra-articular pathology in the hip joint: labral tears, femuro-
acetabular impingement (FAI)
Lumbar spinal stenosis
Tumors, cysts
Gynecological conditions
Diseases such as appendicitis, pyelitis, hypernephroma, uterine
disorders, prostate disorders and malignancies in pelvic
viscera.
Psychogenic disorders: physical fatigue, depression, frustration
Sacroiliitis
124
125. Treatment
Physical therapy has become the main focus for conservative
treatment of patients with piriformis syndrome.
Focusing treatment on relieving the pain through stretching and
decreasing swelling should lead to decompression of the sciatic
nerve and thus relieve symptoms.
Due to the anatomical location of the piriformis, lying deep to the
gluteus maximus, moist heat or ultrasound is often used prior to
stretching in order to preemptively loosen the muscle.
Hip and knee stretches utilizing the fair (flexion, abduction, internal
rotation) position are done in the sitting and standing positions to
effectively relax the tight piriformis.
After stretching it is important to incorporate lumbosacral
stabilization, hip strengthening exercises, and myofascial release.
125
126. Stretching Exercises
Piriformis stretching exercises should be performed in order to
reinstate pain free ROM.
To begin the stretches should be done to the tolerance of the
patient, but some general starting guidelines are 3 sets of 5-10 reps 3
times a day.
As the patient progresses more aggressive stretching techniques can
be used such as the PNF contract relax technique.
Some effective and easy stretches include:
Sit with one leg straight out in front. Hold onto the ankle of your other
leg and pull it directly towards your chest.
126
127. Lie face down and bend one leg under your stomach, then lean
towards the ground.
Lie on your back and cross one leg over the opposite knee, pull the
bottom leg towards your stomach.
127
128. Keep unaffected leg straight then bend the affected leg and cross
it over the straight leg. Pull the crossed leg till a stretch is felt.
128
129. Strengthening:
A strengthening program for the piriformis can be initiated early in
the rehabilitation process.
When strengthening the piriformis most exercise should be done
either with the hip flexed, which is used to focus on abduction, or
with the hip in neutral which emphasizes external rotation exercises.
Resistance can be applied in different ways, including; manually,
with weights, or with thera-bands. The patient should be advanced
as tolerated.
Other strengthening options can include the use of D2 flexion and
D2 extension PNF diagonal patterns.
129
130. Myofascial Release
Tightening of the fascia is a protective mechanism that results from
an injury. As a result of the tightening the fascia loses its pliability
and becomes restricted.
Overtime this causes poor muscular biomechanics, decreased
ROM, altered structural alignment, and decreased strength,
endurance and motor coordination.
In order to combat this the myofacial release technique is used.
Using myofacial release the fascia is stretched allowing a re-
establishment of the health and length of the tissue.
This will allow for a return in the mobility of the joint as well as
decreased pressure on nerves and blood vessels.
The myofascial release is performed by using a sustained pressure to
the restricted tissue, holding for about 90 – 120 seconds. This length
of time is sufficient for lengthening changes to occur.
This technique is then moved to a new tissue barrier and held
again. After being repeated a few times the tissue will become
softer and more movable.
130
131. Physical Therapy Protocol for Patients
With Piriformis Syndrome
1. Ultrasound 2.0 to 2.5W/cm2 applied in broad strokes
longitudinally along the piriformis muscle from the conjoint
tendon to the lateral edge of the greater sciatic foramen for
10 to 14 minutes.
2. Hot packs or cold spray at the same location for 10 minutes.
3. Stretch the piriformis muscle for 10 to 14 minutes by
applying manual pressure to the muscle’s inferior border,
being careful not to press downward, rather directing
pressure tangentially toward the ipsilateral shoulder.
4. Myofascial release at lumbosacral paraspinal muscles.
5. McKenzie exercises.
131
133. Spinal instability is a common condition in patients with low back pain. It may
begin from a congenital problem, trauma, degeneration or a progressing
hypermobility.
Pars interarticularis- the area between the superior and the inferior articulating
processes of the vertebra, that is the point at which the articulating process
approaches the pedicle.
Stress fracture of the pars interarticularis (spondylolysis) occur in young athletes
involved in sports that require episodes of hyperextension, especially if
combined with rotation.
Generally mean changes in the vertebral joint characterizedby increasing
degenerationof the intervertebral disc with subsequent changes in the bones
and soft tissues.
Unilateral or bilateral stable defect in the pars interarticularis
“CollaredScottie dog” deformity
133
134. This condition was initially though to be congenital but
is probably an acquired overuse injury.
Sports in which this injury is commonly seen include
gymnastics, fast bowling (cricket), tennis, dance,
weightlifting, wrestling, pole vaulting and high jump,
as well as throwing activities such as baseball
pitching, javelin, discus and hammer throw.
The fracture usually occurs on the side opposite to the
one performing the activity, that is, left-sided fracture
in the right-handed tennis players.
134
136. Clinical Features
The patient complains of:
Unilateral low back ache, occasionally associated with somatic
buttock pain
Pain that is aggravating by movements involving lumbar extension-
the athlete may describe a single episode of hyperextension that
precipitated the pain.
Occasionally, stress fracture of the pars interarticularis are
asymptomatic.
136
138. On Examination:
Pain is produced on extension with rotation and on extension
while standing on the affected leg.
The athlete may often have an excessive lordotic posture
with associated spasm of the hamstring muscles.
Palpation reveals unilateral tenderness over the site of the
fracture.
Special Tests:
Pain with Spring test
SL stance test; straight leg raises may produce pain
138
139. In cases with recent onset of pain, X-
ray may not demonstrate the
fracture. In longer standing cases, the
typical 'Scotty dog' appearance of a
pars defect is demonstrated on the
45° oblique X-ray.
When a pars defect is suspected
clinically but plain X-ray is normal an
isotopic bone scan, or preferably a
single photon emission computed
tomography (SPECT) scan, should be
performed.
139
140. The bone scan will demonstrate a focal area of increased uptake.
Even when the X-ray demonstrates a pars defect, a SPECT scan
should be performed to confirm the presence of an active stress
fracture.
Patients with a positive SPECT scan result should then undergo
reverse gantry CT scanning to image the fracture. The patient
should be monitored during the healing process, both clinically and
by repeat CT scan of the fracture.
MRI is also capable of demonstrating a pars fracture but may not be
as sensitive as a combination of a SPECT and CT scan.
140
142. Treatment
There is considerable variation in the recommended treatment for pars
stress fractures.
Almost all clinicians agree on the need for restricting the athletic activity
responsible for the pain, stretching the hamstring and gluteal muscles,
and strengthening the abdominal and back extensor muscles as soon
as these can be performed pain-free. However, the use of rigid anti
lordotic bracing is debated.
It would seem from studies that it is the stage and site of the defect
rather than the type of treatment that determines healing of the bony
defect. Pars defects can be divided into early, progressive and terminal
stages.
142
143. The early stage is characterized by focal bony absorption or a
hairline defect on radiographic appearance. In the progressive
stage, the defect is wide and small fragments are present. Sclerotic
change indicates the terminal stage of development.
In most cases of early stage defects, radiographic union will be
achieved, but this will only be achieved in approximately half the
progressive stage cases and virtually none of the cases with sclerotic
changes.
A unilateral defect is more likely to heel than bilateral defects. There
is also an improved rate of union in defects at L4 compared with L5
and in lesions closer to the vertical body.
143
144. Therefore, it is important to make an early diagnosis and commence
a treatment program consisting of rest from sport and rehabilitation.
We believe that there should not be a set period of time but that
the patient should undergo a rehabilitation program initially
involving pain-free progressive exercises but not aggravating
activity (i.e. lumbar extension and rotation).
When the aggravating maneuvers are pain-free and there is no
local tenderness, a gradual progressive resumption of the
aggravating activity over a period of four to six weeks should be
conducted using pain as a guide.
144
145. O'Sullivan et al.’s landmark study of the effectiveness of a specific
exercise program emphasizing training of the transversus abdominis
and multifidus in adults with spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis
showed dramatic differences in pain scores and improved function
that was maintained for 30 months compared to a control group
who were treated with general fitness training, supervised exercise,
modalities and trunk flexion exercises.
A core stability training program should be included in the
treatment program.
145
146. As with any overuse injury, it is important to identify the cause or causes
and to correct them if possible. Technique adjustments should be made
to limit the amount of hyperextension and, if necessary, a brace can be
used during sporting activity.
This injury is extremely common among young fast bowlers in cricket.
Fast bowlers use one of three techniques-side-on, front-on or a mixed
technique where the lower half of the body is front-on and the upper
half side-on.
It is this latter combined technique that appears to be associated with
the development of stress fractures of the pars interarticularis. The
bowler and coach should be advised to change to either a side-on or
front-on technique.
146
152. Spondylolisthesis refers to the slipping of part or all of one
vertebra forward on another.
The term is derived from the Greek spondylos, meaning
vertebra, and olisthanein, meaning to slip or slide down a
slippery path.
It is often associated with bilateral pars defects that
usually develop in early childhood and have a definite
family predisposition.
Pars defects that develop due to athletic activity (stress
fractures) rarely result in spondylolisthesis.
152
153. Spondylolisthesis is most commonly seen in children between the
ages of 9 and 14 years. In the vast majority of cases it is the L5
vertebra that slips forward on the S1.
The spondylolisthesis is graded according to the degree of slip of the
vertebra.
A grade I slip denotes that a vertebra has slipped up to 25% over
the body of the vertebra underlying it; in a grade II slip the
displacement is greater than 25%; in a grade III slip, greater than
50%; and in a grade IV slip, greater than 75%. lateral X-rays best
demonstrate the extent of vertebral slippage.
153
156. Clinical features
Grade I spondylolisthesis is often asymptomatic and the patients
may be unaware of the defect.
Patients with grade II or higher slips may complain of low back pain,
with or without leg pain.
The back pain is aggravated by extension activities.
156
157. On Examination:
On examination, there may be a palpable dip
corresponding to the slip.
Associated soft tissue abnormalities may be present.
In considering the treatment of this condition, it is important
to remember that the patient’s low back pain is not
necessarily being caused by the spondylolisthesis.
157
158. Treatment
Treatment of athletes with grade I or grade II symptomatic
spondylolisthesis involves:
Rest from aggravating activities combined with abdominal and
extensor stabilizing exercises and hamstring stretching.
Antilordotic bracing, which may also be helpful.
Mobilization of stiff joints above or below the slip on clinical
assessment; gentle rotations may be helpful in reducing pain;
manipulation should not be performed at the level of slip.
158
159. Athletes with grade I or grade II spondylolisthesis may return to sport
after treatment when they are pain free on extension and have
good spinal stabilization. If the symptoms recur, activity must be
ceased.
Athletes with grade III or grade IV spondylolisthesis should avoid high
speed or contact sports. Treatment is symptomatic. It is rare for a slip
to progress; however, if there is evidence of progression, spinal
fusion should be performed.
159
160. Physical therapy to include
Stabilization exercises - care taken to avoid extension and/or rotational forces
that may increase forces on instability. Primary multifidus and transverse
abdominal strengthening,both static and dynamic(Newsletter winter 2004).
Mobilization/manipulation of neighboring joint stiffness to reduce stresses to
instability
Postural education
Conservative treatment of instability has a high rate of success, particularly with
younger patients.
Surgical interventionis rarely neededunless the case is severe.
160
161. Conservative Management
Stretching of hamstrings is done at regular intervals.
Patient is advised to lie prone to control the advancement of
lordosis.
A thoraco-lumbar-sacral orthoses is given to prevent the lordosis.
The brace has to be worn continuously.
161
162. Indications for surgical intervention
are:
grade 3 or higher displacement
neurological signs that do not resolve with
conservative treatment traumatic or iatrogenic spondylolisthesis
degenerative spondylolisthesis with gross
instability and disabling pain.
If surgical intervention is required a spinal fusion and laminectomy is
commonly performed. The fusion may use bone grafting and spinal
instrumentation to correct the displacement of the vertebra and
relieve pressure on neurologic tissues.
162
163. Physiotherapy Management after Surgery
During Immobilization
Deep breathing exercises
Early ankle, foot and arm movements are also encouraged
Assisted movements to knee joints are given
Isometric exercises of gluteal muscles
Gradually hip flexion is encouraged, but it should not exceed 60
degrees.
During Mobilization
Gradual mobilization of spine is initiated. The patient is encouraged to
perform functional activities and to perform all the activities of daily
living.
163
165. CAUSES OF LOW BACK PAIN
Specific causes of LBP can be subdivided by the
position of the spine at the time of injury: neutral,
flexion, or extension.
Neutral conditions will be discussed first. These are
defined as injuries or pain syndromes of the lower
back that occur while the lumbar spine is in a
neutral position.
Extension-related injuries occur when the lumbar
spine is in extension.
Flexion-related injuries occur when the lumbar spine
is in flexion.
165
170. SIJ Dysfunction
SIJ dysfunction refers to an abnormal functions (e.g. hypo- and
hypermobility) at the joint, which places stresses on structures in
or around it.
Therefore, SIJ dysfunction may contribute to lumbar, buttock,
hamstring or groin pain.
170
171. Epidemiology and Risk factors
Training and sporting events that require repetitive unidirectional
pelvic shear and torsional forces (e.g., skating, gymnastics, and
bowling) increase the risk of developing sacral and SI joint
dysfunction.
A sacral shear is commonly caused by a runner who
unexpectedly steps in a hole or in an Olympic weight lifter
whose weight suddenly shifts and causes a buckling of the
opposite knee while the ipsilateral leg remains locked in place.
171
172. Precipitating factors for the development of SIJ disorders may
include muscle imbalance between the hip flexors and
extensors or between the external and internal rotators of the
hip, leg length imbalance and biomechanical abnormalities,
such as excessive subtalar pronation.
172
173. Functional Anatomy
The SIJ is diarthrodial (synovial anterior and fibrous posterior). Its joint surfaces
are reciprocally shaped but not congruent, have a high friction coefficient
and have two large elevations allowing interdigitation with the reciprocal
surface. (plane synovial joint)
Age changes begin to occur on the iliac side of the joint as early as the third
decade. The joint surface irregularities increase with age and seem to be
weight-bearing related. The capsule becomes more thickened and fibrous
with age. SIJ motion is best described as a combination flexion and
extension, superior and inferior glide and anterior and posterior
translation(video).
SIJ motion is minimal, with approximately 2.5º of rotation, 0.7 mm (0.3 in.) of
translation, and it is best regarded as a stress-relieving joint in conjunction with
counterpart and the pubic symphysis.
173
175. In the normal gait cycle, there are combined activities that occur
conversely in the right and left innominate bones, and function in
connection with the sacrum and spine.
Throughout this cycle there is also rotatory motion at the pubic
symphysis, which is essential to all normal motion through the joint. In
static stance, when one bends forward and the lumbar spine regionally
extends, the sacrum regionally flexes with the base moving forward and
the apex moving posterior.
During this motion, both innominates go into a motion of external
rotation and out-flaring. This combination of motion during forward
flexion is referred to as nutation of the pelvis. The opposite occurs in
extension and is called counternutation.
175
176. Osteopaths describes a number of dysfunctions associated with
hypomobility:
1. Innominate shears, superior and inferior
2. Innominate rotations, anterior and posterior
3. Innominate in-flare and out-flare
4. Sacral torsions, flexion and extension
5. Unilateral sacral lesions, flexion and extension.
176
178. Vleeming and colleagues have describe their integrated model of
joint dysfunction. It integrates structure (form and anatomy),
function (forces and motor control) and the mind (emotions and
awareness). Integral to the biomechanics of SIJ stability is the
concept of a self-locking mechanism. The ability of the SIJ to self-
lock occurs through two types of closure: form and force.
Form closure describes how specifically shaped, closely fitting
contacts provide inherent stability independent of external load.
Force closure describes: how external compression forces add
additional stability. The fascia and muscles within the region provide
significant self-bracing and self-locking to the SIJ and its ligaments
through their cross-like anatomical configuration.
178
179. The cross like configuration
demonstrating force closure of SIJ
This is formed ventrally by the external abdominal obliques, linea
alba, internal abdominal obliques, transverse abdominals; dorsally
the latissimus dorsi, thoracolumbar fascia, gluteus maximus and
iliotibial tract contribute significantly.
Vleeming et al. further proposed that the posterior layer of thoraco
lumbar fascia acted to transfer load from the ipsilateral latissimus
dorsi to the contralateral gluteus maximus.
This load transfer is through to be critical during rotation of the trunk,
helping to stabilize the lower lumbar spine and pelvis.
179
181. A connection has also been show between the biceps femoris
muscle and the subcutaneous ligament allowing the hamstring
to play an integral role in the intrinsic stability of the SIJ.
The biceps femoris, which is frequently found to be shortened on
the side of the SIJ dysfunction, may act to compensate to help
stabilize the joint.
181
N.B.
182. Biomechanics
The function of the SI joint is stability, which facilitates a safe load
transfer through the lumbo sacral pelvic complex.
Any muscle imbalance in this region can lead to SI joint
dysfunction, which can result in a torsion or shear.
182
183. Clinical Features
The patient with SIJ pain classically describes low back pain below
L5.
The pain is usually restricted to one side but may occasionally be
bilateral.
SIJ disorders commonly refer to the buttock, groin and posterolateral
thigh. Occasionally, SIJ pain refers to the scrotum or labia.
183
184. Broadhursrt describes a clinically useful description of pelvic/SIJ
dysfunction.
Clinically, the patient has deep-seated buttock pain, difficultly in
negotiating stairs and problems rolling over in bed, with a trial of
signs-pain over the SIJ, tenderness over the sacrospinous and
sacrotuberous ligaments, and pain reproduction over the pubic
symphysis.
184
185. Causes of Sacroiliac Joint
Dysfunction
Some of the most common and significant sources of LBP include
sacral torsion, shear of the sacrum, or derangement of the SI joint.
Because of the biomechanics and load translation that occur
through this joint, the dysfunction or loss of sacral motion will cause
pain and dysfunction elsewhere (e.g., in the lumbosacral segments
or the hip joint) as the body attempts to maintain normal function.
Additionally, distant anatomic or mechanical alterations such as
physiologic leg-length discrepancy, muscle imbalance
(predominately the contralateral gluteus maximus and the latissimus
dorsi in an attempt to stabilize the incompetent joint), trunk or hip
flexibility, or improper sport-specific technique may lead to sacral
and SI joint mechanics that result in injury and pain.
185
186. Of the three transverse axes of the sacrum (superior, middle, and
inferior), the middle axis is primarily involved in sacral dysfunctions.
A sacral shear is a nonphysiologic dysfunction that occurs as a result
of a sudden downward force of the sacrum in combination with an
equal or greater upward force on the ipsilateral leg.
A key to discriminating a sacral shear from a simple SI joint
dysfunction is the lack of pain referred above the L5 level in sacral
dysfunction.
186
187. History
Athletes will normally complain of pain in the SI joint, with pain
focused around the posterior superior iliac spine and the sacral
sulcus.
Pain may be exacerbated during repetitive overload activities,
transitional movements, or unsupported sitting. The patient may sit
on the opposite buttock in an attempt to alleviate his or her
symptoms.
A patient who is found to have a sacral torsion or shear may
complain of pain in the SI region contralaterally as well as pain in
the mid back or even the neck, resulting from spinal compensation
for an unleveled base as the body attempts to keep the eyes level
with the horizontal.
187
188. Examination
The physical examination of a sacral torsion consists of both the seated and
standing flexion tests to determine if an SI or iliosacral dysfunction exists.
The examiner must determine the rotation and axis of the dysfunction by
bilaterally palpating the sacral sulcus (base) with his or her thumbs: the thumb
that is more anterior by palpation is the deeper sulcus.
He or she must palpate the inferior lateral angles of the sacrum: the thumb
that is more posterior and, by convention of sacral mechanics, more inferior is
the posterior inferior lateral angle.
Innominate compression can be performed with the patient lying supine: the
innominate that does not move freely or that elicits pain at the SI joint when
equal, posterior force is placed on the anterior superior iliac spines is the
dysfunctional side.
Using this information, the physician can determine the athlete’s type of
sacral dysfunction.
188
189. To test for a sacral shear, the practitioner places his or her thumbs on the soft
tissue below the gluteus on either side of the coccyx and pushes cephalad
with light pressure until the thumbs strike the caudal surface of the sacrum on
each side of the coccyx: the more inferiorly displaced inferior lateral angle is
ipsilateral to the sacral shear.
In addition, in sacral shear dysfunction, no motion will be felt at the ipsilateral
inferior pole of the SI joint. Palpation of the ipsilateral sacrotuberous ligament
will reveal it to be lax as a result of the bony approximation of the sacrum and
the ischium.
Finally, to test gross SI joint motion, the patient is placed prone with the
affected side leg flexed to 90 degrees at the knee. While one hand abducts
the athlete’s leg, the other monitors for gapping of the SI joint just medial to
the posterior superior iliac spine ipsilaterally. The side with the sacral shear will
not gap.
189
190. The physical examination of the SI joint is extensive, and numerous tests have
developed that induce shearing or rotational forces to stress inflamed
structures, thus provoking pain.
The most common provocation and motion tests for the sacrum and SI joint
include the compression test; the distraction (gapping) test; the Gaenslen
sign; the flexed, abducted, externally rotated (FABER) test (i.e., Patrick’s or
figure four test); the flexed, adducted, internally rotated (FADIR) test; Gillet’s
test; the Lesegue sign; the posterior shear (POSH) test; the resisted abduction
(REAB) test; the WilsonBarstow test; and the Yeoman test. (pdf)
However, for SI joint assessment, a combination of the FABER, POSH, and
REAB tests has a high predictive value in diagnosing SI joint dysfunction, with
a sensitivity ranging from 77% to 87% and a specificity approaching 100%.
190
193. Diagnostic Imaging
All types of imaging studies (plain radiographs, CT scanning, MRI,
bone scintigraphy, and SPECT) have proven to be of little value for
diagnosing SI joint and sacral dysfunctions.
However, if an infectious, metabolic, fracture, or neoplastic
condition is suspected, or if symptoms persist after a trial of
conservative and manipulative treatment, imaging of the SI joint
should be performed.
Multiple authors report intra-articular injections, primarily under
fluoroscopic guidance, as the gold standard for diagnosing the SI
joint dysfunction.
193
194. Treatment
Due to the complex nature of the SIJ and its surrounding structures, treatment
must focus on the entire abdomino-lumbo-sacro-pelvic-hip complex, addressing
articular, muscular, neural and fascial restrictions, inhibitions and deficiencies.
Core stability training should be included. A recent study has suggested that the
clinical benefits incurred with training the transversus abdominis muscle may be
due to significantly reduced laxity in the SIJ. Exercise rehabilitation is an integral
part of recovery from SIJ dysfunction.
Pelvic or SIJ dysfunction should be considered with the lumbar spine in any
program designed to improve the overall control of the lumbopelvic area.
Stretching and soft tissuetherapy are useful in correcting pelvic/SIJ imbalance.
The most common soft tissue abnormalities found with unilateral anterior tilt are
tight psoas and rectus femoris muscles.
194
195. Muscle energy techniques may also be helpful, as may osteopathic
manipulation.
Trochanteric belt (sacroiliac Belts) may be used to stabilize the joint.
These belts have not been shown to be particularly helpful.
Biomechanical proprioceptive retraining should be done to
maintain sacral and SI joint function.
If these manual techniques fail to control the sacroiliac pain,
injection therapy may prove useful.
195
197. Exercises to improve SI joint stabilization should include those that
isolate the transverses abdominus, multifidus, and piriformis as well as
those that strengthen the coordination between the contralateral
gluteus maximus and the latissimus dorsi.
A combination of local anesthetic and corticosteroid agents may
be injected into the region of the SIJ either with or without
fluoroscopic guidance. Sclerosants are occasionally used when
hypermobility is present, sometimes referred to as prolotherapy.
197
198. PHASE I - SIJ Pain Relief & Joint
Protection
Managing your sacroiliac pain is the main reason that you seek
treatment for sacroiliac joint dysfunction. In truth, it was actually
the final symptom that you developed and should be the first
symptom to improve.
Managing your inflammation. Sacroiliac joint inflammation it
best eased via ice therapy and techniques or exercises that
deload the inflammed structures. Your doctor may recommend
a course of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as
ibuprofen.
Your physiotherapist will use an array of treatment tools to
reduce your sacroiliac pain and inflammation. These include:
ice, electrotherapy, acupuncture, deloading taping techniques,
a SIJ belt, soft tissue massage and temporary use of a mobility
aid (e.g. cane or crutch) to off-load the affected side.
198
199. PHASE II - Restoring Normal ROM,
Strength
As your pain and inflammation settles, your physiotherapist will turn
their attention to restoring your normal pelvic alignment and
sacroiliac joint range of motion, muscle length and resting tension,
muscle strength and endurance, proprioception, balance and gait
(walking pattern).
Your physiotherapist will commence you on a lower abdominal
and hip core stability program to facilitate your important muscles
that dynamically control and stabilize your sacroiliac joints.
Researchers have discovered the importance of your hip muscle
recruitment patterns with a normal order of: deep, then
intermediate and finally superficial muscle firing patterns in normal
pain-free hips.
Your physiotherapist will assess your muscle recruitment pattern and
prescribe the best exercises for you specific to your needs.
199
200. PHASE III - Restoring Full Function
As your sacroiliac joint dynamic control improves, your
physiotherapist will turn their attention to restoring your normal
pelvic alignment and sacroiliac joint range of motion during
more stressful positions and postures plus work on your muscle
power, proprioception, balance and gait (walking pattern).
Depending on your chosen sport or activities of daily living, your
physiotherapist will aim to restore your SIJ function to safely allow
you to return to your desired activities.
Everyone has different demands for their sacroiliac joints that will
determine what specific treatment goals you need to achieve.
For some it be simply to walk around the block. Others may wish
to run a marathon.
Your physiotherapist will tailor your sacroiliac joint rehabilitation
to help you achieve your own functional goals.
200
201. PHASE IV - Preventing a Recurrence
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction does have a tendency to return. The
main reason it is thought to recur is due to insufficient
rehabilitation. In particular, poor compliance with deep
abdominal and hip core muscle exercises. You should continue
a version of these exercises routinely a few times per week.
Your physiotherapist will assist you in identifying the best exercises
for you to continue indefinitely.
In addition to your muscle control, your physiotherapist will assess
you SIJ, spine, hip and lower limb biomechanics and correct any
defects. (whole kinetic chain)
It may be as simple as providing you with adjacent muscle
exercises or some foot orthotics to address any biomechanical
faults in the legs or feet.
201
204. Description
Lumbar facet syndrome means: A dysfunction at the level of the
posterior facet joints of the spine. These joints together with the
disc form the intervertebral joint. Changes at the level of the
posterior facet joints can influence the disc and vice versa.
Lumbar facet (arthrosis) syndrome (chondromalacia facetiae),
which was described by R.K. Ghormley in 1933, is a
chondromalacial condition that occurs at the zygapophyseal
joint.
The term ‘dysfunction’ implies that at a certain level (mostly L4-L5
or L5-S1) these components do not function normally.
204
205. The lumbar facet syndrome is a painful irritation of the posterior part
of the lumbar spine. Swelling from the surrounding structures, can
cause pain due to an irritation of the nerve roots.
Little capsular tears can originate at the level of the posterior facet
joints due to a trauma. This can lead to a subluxation of the joint. The
Synovium that surrounds the joint is damaged and leads to a
synovitis.
Secondly a hypertonic contraction of the surrounding muscles
present itself. This is a protection mechanism that increases the pain.
These changes lead to a fibrosisand osteophyte formation.
205
206. The most common cause is repetitive micro trauma and as positive
result of this chronic degeneration. In daily living this may occur with
repetitive extension of the back. So mostly all movements with the
arms above the head.
These recurring injuries can happen in sports were it is necessary to
make repetitive powerful hyperextensions of the lumbar spine.
An irritation can also occur when the intervertebral disc is damaged
and the biomechanics of the joint have changed. In this case the
facet joints are exposed to a higher loading.
206
207. Epidemiology
The lumbosacral facet joint is reported to be the source of pain in 15-40% of
patients with chronic LBP. Ray believed that facet joint–mediated pain is
the etiology for most cases of mechanical LBP, whereas other authors have
argued that it may contribute to nearly 80% of cases.
Thus, the diagnosis and treatment of this entity may help alleviate LBP in a
significant number of patients.
This condition most commonly occurs among older athletes, but it can be
seen as early as late adolescence, predominantly among football lineman
and weight lifters, who subject their spines to tremendous axial and
torsional loads.
207
208. Pathophysiology and mechanism
of injury
Asymmetric angulation of facet joints that are subjected to
increased axial loads produces stresses that are sufficient to
cause articular cartilage damage.
With repeated microtrauma, fracturing of the articular surface
occurs, with subsequent erosion of the underlying bony surface
(eburnation).
208
209. Clinical Features
Local pressure pain at the level of the affected joint
Local pressure pain of the M. Multifidi and M. Erector Spinae
(when palpating very stiff due to hypertonia)
Decreased extension and painful extension
Unilateral abnormal lateroflexion
Antalgia can occur when rising up with a flexed torso
Sometimes a functional scoliosis in anteflexion
209
210. sensibility/pain local and ipsilateral
pain in hyperextension
pain in hip, bottom and back when liftinga extended leg (SLR)
referred pain not further than the knee
local stiffness
Kemp’s test positive
Springing test positive
Pain: mild to severe, different between patients and within patient.
Pain variant during different positions.
210
211. Increase pain
- Extension
- Rotation
- Prolonged standing
- Sudden movements
- After rest
- Lateral flexion towards affected side
- Returning from flexed position
- Movements in general
- Sitting, flexion, using a clutch (in a vehicle), coughing and/or
sneezing, and walkingfor a long time
211
212. Decrease pain
- Walking
- Lying with knees bent
- Medication
- Supported flexion, sitting, standing with weight on hands and
elbows
- Rest
- Lateral bending towards healthy side
- Varying activity
212
213. History & other findings
No characteristic pain pattern or level-specific signs and symptoms
have been found to be specific for the diagnosis of lumbar facet
syndrome.
Patients commonly present with pain upon rising or when
performing lumbar flexion and with point tenderness in the
paraspinous region over the affected facet joint.
Referred pain, when occassionally present, extends to the thigh but
not below the knee.
Other common findings are tightened hamstrings and a positive
Gowers sign (the hands incrementally stepping up the thighs to
support the upper torso when rising).
213
214. Imaging Studies
Radiographic imaging during the latter stages of this condition
demonstrates changes that are indicative of facet arthrosis.
However, this finding is relatively uncommon during the early stages
of disease, and it is therefore of little diagnostic value.
CT scanning provides detailed imaging of the facet joint chondral
surfaces, and it can delineate areas of cartilaginous damage.
214
215. Lumbar Facet syndrome can not be reliably clinically diagnosed (Jackson
RP2 1992). The most used systems to diagnose this syndrome are an X-ray, a
computed tomography (CT) scan of the spine or a magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) scan.
The working diagnosis of facet pain, based on history and clinical
examination, may be confirmed by performing a diagnostic block. This is
considered positive when the patient experiences a 50% pain reduction.
It involves injecting a medicine into or near the nerves that supply the facet
joint. If the pain is not relieved by the injection, it is unlikely that the facet
joint is the source of the pain. If these injections help and reduce the pain,
we can suggest that the pain comes from the facet joint.
215
216. Although no single sign or symptom is diagnostic, Jackson et al; demonstrated
that the combination of the following 7 factors was significantly correlated with
pain relief from an intra-articular facet joint injection:
Older age
Previous history of LBP
Normal gait
Maximal pain with extension from a fully flexed position
The absence of leg pain
The absence of muscle spasm
The absence of exacerbation with a Valsalva maneuver
216
218. Examination
Inspection
Inspectionshouldinclude an evaluation of paraspinal musclefullness or
asymmetry,increaseor decrease in lumbar lordosis, muscleatrophy, or
posture asymmetry.
Patients with chronicfacet syndromemay have flattening of the lumbar
lordosis and rotation or lateral bending at the sacroiliac joint or
thoracolumbar area.
Palpation
The examiner shouldpalpate along the paravertebral regions and directly
over the transverseprocesses because the facet joints are not truly
palpable. This is performedin an attempt to localizeand reproduce any
point tenderness,whichis usuallypresent with facet joint–mediatedpain.
In some cases, facet joint–mediatedpain may radiate to the gluteal or
posterior thigh regions.
Sensory examination
Sensory examination(i.e, light touch and pinprickin a dermatomal
distribution) findings are usually normal in persons with facet joint pathology.
218
219. Range of motion
Range of motion should be assessed through flexion, extension,
lateral bending, and rotation.
With facet joint–mediated LBP, pain is often increased with
hyperextension or rotation of the lumbar spine, and it might be
either focal or radiating.
Flexibility
Inflexibility of the pelvic musculature can directly impact the
mechanics of the lumbosacral spine.
With facet joint pathology, the clinician may find an abnormal
pelvic tilt and rotation of the hip secondary to tight hamstrings, hip
rotators, and the quadratus, but these findings are nonspecific and
can be found in patients with other causes of LBP.
219
220. Muscle stretch reflexes
Patients with facet joint–mediated LBP usually have normal muscle
stretch reflexes. Radicular findings are usually absent unless the patient
has nerve root impingement from bony overgrowth or a synovial cyst.
Side-to-side asymmetry should lead one to consider possible nerve root
impingement.
Muscle strength
Manual muscle testing is important to determine whether weakness is
present and whether the distribution of weakness corresponds to a
single root, multiple roots, or a peripheral nerve or plexus.
Typically, manual muscle testing results are normal in persons with facet
joint pathology; however, subtle weakness of the muscles of the pelvic
girdle may contribute to pelvic tilt abnormalities. This subtle weakness
may be appreciated with trunk, pelvic, and lower-extremity extension
asymmetry.
Straight leg – raise test
This maneuver is usually normal for facet joint–mediated pain.
However, if facet joint hypertrophy or a synovial cyst encroaches on
the intervertebral foramen, causing nerve root impingement, this
maneuver may elicit a positive response.
220
221. Special test for LBA due to facet joint
Kemp’s test &
Springing test
Rx:-
The pharmacological therapy used by doctors for acute back pains
caused by facet joint syndrome is based on administrating muscle
relaxants.
In medicine they also use nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and
acetaminophen as first line drugs for the treatment of LBP, with little
evidence to support one particular drug over another.
Standard treatment modalities for facet joint syndrome pain include
intraarticular steroid injections and radiofrequency denervation of
the medial branches innervating the joints. Yet there is much
controversy in scientific articles related to this standard treatment.
221
222. Physical Therapy Management
When acute signals have disappeared, the underlying cause is treated by
physiotherapy:
The first thing you need to do is to inform your patient. He needs to understand the
problems he is having. You may not make him anxious, so a diplomatic approach is
necessary to prevent him from catastrophizing. When he is anxious when he needs to
move, you cannot do exercises. So the kinesiophobia needs to be banned.
Now you can start with the exercises. When your patient is having an antalgic posture,
this needs to be treated by giving instructions how he has to keep his back in the right
position/straight. He has to keep all physiological curves in his back (cervical lordosis,
thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis).
Instructions are not only important for passive activities, like sitting and standing, but also
for active movements. So when he does a certain movement, he can take a certain
posture to which will not provoke his symptoms.
As therapist you can do passive modalities. You can mobilize the lower back of your
patient. In a later stage of the therapy, you can manipulate the lower back.
222
223. The initial treatment for acute facet
joint pain is focused on:
Education
Maintenance of positions that provide comfort
Reducing lumbar lordosis
Relative rest
Pain relief
Exercises
223
224. Therefore it is important to reduce excessive lumbar lordosis with
exercise because excessive lordosis increases loading on the posterior
aspect of the spine, including the z-joints. To achieve this, the patient
should be taught pelvic maneuvers to reduce the degree of lumbar
lordosis.
These pelvic tilt exercises can be performed in multiple positions such as
sitting, standing with knees bent or straight legs.
Bed rest beyond 2 days isn’t recommended as it can have undesirable
effects on bones, connective tissues, muscles and the cardiovascular
system. (discussed earlier)
The patient is encouraged to limit activity on days when the symptoms
are not tolerable, but should never be completely inactive. Therapist
must strive to influence the patient to be as active as possible.
224
225. Bronfort G. et al. (1996) studied the relative efficacy of three
different treatments for chronic low back pain. They comprised
followed combinations: spinal manipulative therapy (SMT)
combined with trunk strengthening exercises (TSE) vs. SMT combined
with trunk stretching exercises and SMT combined with TSE vs. non-
steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy combined with TSE.
During 11 weeks (5 weeks under supervising and 6 weeks alone)
they examined: patient-rated low back pain, disability and
functional health status.
Their conclusion was that each of the three therapeutic regimens
was associated with similar and clinically important improvements.
For the management of facet joint syndrome, trunk exercise in
combination with SMT or NSAID therapy seemed to be beneficial
and worthwhile.
225
226. Spinal manipulation is being used for both short- and long-term pain
relief.
Other scientific sources recommend treating facet joint syndrome
with heat, cryotherapy and mobilizations. These techniques appear
to have a relaxing effect on the muscles. As the muscles relax, the
nociceptive information will decrease.
While these techniques have clear advantages, they generally only
attain a temporary pain relief as they are often not a final solution to
treat facet joint syndrome.
226
227. Gerard A. Malanga et al. (2008) argue that once the painful symptoms are
controlled, stretching and strengthening exercises can be initiated. For the
stretch, the focus should be on the muscles that create excessive anterior tilt of
the pelvis.
Stretching should not be not limited to just these muscles because all the muscles
articulating to the lumbar spine and pelvic girdle may be imbalanced, and
regular stretching can help restore productive mechanics to the lumbar spine
and pelvis.
Therefore, stretching programs should also include the hamstrings, quadriceps,
hip abductors, gluteals, and abdominals. Stretching through dynamic postural
motions (e.g, yoga postures) can be especially helpful because the motions can
restore balance to the muscles of the lumbar spine and pelvic girdle.
These exercises are eventually incorporated into a more extensive rehabilitation
program, which includes spine stabilization exercises The objective of these
exercises is to teach the patient how to find and maintain a neutral spine
throughout everyday activities.
227
228. A series of 16 exercises should be performed in the same order, as described by
Moon et al (2013). Before each exercise, the physical therapist gave detailed
verbal explanation and visual instructions (pictures), regarding the start and end
positions.
All exercises were conducted according to the following specific principles:
breathe in and out, gently and slowly draw in your lower abdomen below your
umbilicus without moving your upper stomach, back or pelvis"; resulting in a
situation referred to as hollowing.
Subjects practiced "hollowing" with a therapist providing verbal instruction and
tactile feedback until they were able to perform the maneuver in a satisfactory
manner.
In addition, a "bulging" of the multifidus muscle should have been felt by the
therapist when the fingers were placed on either side of the spinous processes of
the L4 and L5 vertebrae, directly over the belly of this muscle. These feedback
techniques provided by precise palpitation of the appropriate muscles, ensure
effective muscle activation.
228
229. In the final phase of the rehabilitation, eccentric muscle strengthening
exercises and dynamic exercises are added to the program. These are to be
performed in a functional manner and in functional planes.
All exercises were performed in the treatment room under the supervision of a
physical therapist with technical knowledge.
The therapist put each patient into the appropriate position to achieve the
correct posture and muscle contraction.
An important focus of the exercise therapy should be on stabilization therapy.
They are aimed to strengthen the deep lumbar stabilizing muscles: the
transversus abdominis, lumbar multifidi, and internal obliques.
229
231. Description
Degenerative disc disease or discopathy
occurs when the discs (shock absorbers)
cartilage between the bones of the spine,
subjected to a process of degeneration that causes the disc to lose height
and hydratation.
The disc can’t fulfill his function anymore and it usually causes pain. It occurs
naturally in most people over the years and is a part of the aging process.
The discopathy may develop at any level of the spine, but is most common in
the cervical and lower lumbar segments. These are the transitions between
mobile (cervical, lumbar) and fixed (thoracic, sacral) sections of the spine.
231
232. Clinically Relevant Anatomy
Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) is thought to begin
with changes to the annulus fibrosis, intervertebral disc,
and subchondral bone. The process of degeneration is
divided into three classifications including: early
dysfunction, intermediate instability, and final
stabilization.
Early dysfunction is the classified as the beginning of
degenerative changes which can occur as early as 20
years. Intermediate instability is classified by a loosening
of the annulus fibrosis, which can cause back pain.
Fibrosis to the posterior structure and formation of
osteophytes denotes the final stabilization process. Pain
decreases, and motion decreases.
232
233. Epidemiology
Disc degeneration is predominately seen in the adult population as a result of
years of overuse and improper lifting techniques. Degenerative disc changes
in preadolescent gymnasts are well described in the literature, with a
reported incidence rate of 11% in pre-elite gymnasts, 43% in elite gymnasts,
and 64% in Olympic gymnasts.
Conversely, this is a relatively uncommon injury among children who do not
participate in gymnastics. When training exceeds 15 hours per week, the risk
of injury increases from 13% to 57%.
Other sports that are associated with disc degeneration are collision sports
(e.g., football, lacrosse, and hockey), soccer, bowling, gymnastics, weight
lifting, and wrestling.
Of all professional sports, golfers have the highest incidence of back injury
because of the torsional stress of the golf swing wind up, swing, and follow
through.
233
235. Etiology
Degenerative disc disease refers to a condition in which the
involved disc causes LBP. Lumbar degenerative disc disease is
usually the result of a twisting injury to the lower back, such as
when a person swings a golf club or rotates to put an object on a
surface to the side of or behind them.
The pain is also frequently caused by simple wear and tear on the
spine and comes with the general aging process.
Degenerative disc disease is fairly common, and it is estimated that
at least 30% of people aged 30-50 years old will have some degree
of disc space degeneration, although not all will have pain or ever
receive a formal diagnosis.
235
236. The process that leads to DDD begins with structural changes. The
annulus fibrosis (outer portion of the disc) loses water content over
time which will make it increasingly unyielding toward everyday
stress and strain on the spine.
The loss of compliance in the discs contributes to forces being
redirected from the anterior and middle portions of the facets to the
posterior aspect, thus causing facet arthritis.
Another result is hypertrophy of the vertebral bodies adjacent to the
degenerating disc. The overgrowths are known as bony spurs or
osteophytes (final stabilization process).
236
238. Activities that typically increase pain include:
Sitting for extended periods of time
Rotating, bending, or lifting
Activities that typically decrease pain include:
Changing positions often
Lying down
Staying active
238
239. Grades
There are different degrees of annular disruption. We can classify
them into 4 grades, at which grade 0 is added. We differentiate
these grades by means of a contrast medium injection.
Grade 0: no disruption
Grade 1: the contrast medium passes into the cartilage endplate
through tear
Grade 2: the contrast medium flows into the bony endplate
Grade 3: the contrast medium is going into the cancellous bone of
vertebrae under endplate
Grade 4: the contrast medium leaks completely in the cancellous
bone.
239
241. Pathogenesis and mechanism of
injury
A number of hypotheses have been developed to clearly define
the mechanism of disc degeneration. One of the most convincing is
the ‘‘wear-and-tear’’ hypothesis, which proposes that localized
microtrauma from repeated lateral bending, rotational torque, and
axial loading during repetitive movements of the lumbar region
cause injury to the intervertebral disc.
In vitro studies have demonstrated that the application of static
loads can induce cell apoptosis, alter structural disc properties
(thickness, axial compliance, and angular laxity), change matrix
content (proteoglycan and type I/II collagen), interfere with
metalloproteinase activity, and alter gene expression (aggrecan
and collagen II).
241