7. What characterizes the natural history of type 2
diabetes?
Normal
Pre-diabetes
By HbA1c
By Diurnal Glucose Pattern
Impaired Glucose
Tolerance
Overt Type 2 Diabetes
Insulin Resistance
Insulin Deficiency
Impaired Incretin Function
8. The Natural History of Type 2 Diabetes
Pre-diabetes
Deterioration of
Glucose Control
Normal
•Insulin
Resistance
•Insulin
Deficiency
•Incretin
Dysfunction
Normal
13. Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes
Blood Glucose and HbA1c Levels
New
Fasting OGTT HbA1c
Diabetes Diabetes Diabetes
>126 mg/dL >200 mg/dL >6.5%
Impaired fasting Impaired glucose High risk for
glucose Pre-diabetes tolerance diabetes
(54 million)
100-125 mg/dL 140-199 mg/dL 6.0-6.4%
Normal Normal Normal
70-99 <140 mg/dL <6.0%
mg/dL
ADA Standards of Care. Diabetes Care, Suppl.1, 2010; ADA , EASD, IDF International
Expert Committee Report on HbA1c for Diagnosis of Diabetes.
14. ADA Clinical Practice Recommendations
Diagnosis of Diabetes
A1C ≥ 6.5%
– Test performed NGSP certified and standardized to DCCT*
FPG ≥ 126 mg/dl
– No caloric intake for at least 8 hours
2 hour glucose ≥ 200 mg/dl during an OGTT
– Test performed as per WHO (75 g glucose)
If classic symptoms of hyperglycemia = random glucose ≥ 200 mg/dl
NORMAL PREDIABETES IFG or IGT DIABETES
FPG < 100 FPG > 100 – 125 (IFG) FPG > 126
2-h PG < 140 2-h PG 140 – 199 (IGT) 2-h PG > 200
A1c < 5.7% A1c 5.7 – 6.4% A1c > 6.5%
American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 323(Suppl 1), 2009
16. Risk Factors for Type 2 Diabetes (screening for
asymptomatic patients)
Age > 45 years
Family history of type 2 diabetes in parents or siblings
Overweight or Obesity (BMI >25 kg/m²)
Habitual physical inactivity
Race/ethnicity e.g. Native American, African American, Hispanic, Asian
American and Pacific Islanders
Previously identified pre-diabetes (IFG or IGT)
Hypertension >140/90 mmHg in adults
HDL <35 mg/dL and triglycerides >250 mg/dL
History of GDM or delivery of baby weighing >9 lbs.
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/Acanthosis Nigricans
History of vascular disease
Source: American Diabetes Association, 2010
17. Treat to Target
HbA1c < 7%
Fasting and Pre meal glucose 70-120 mg/dL
(50% of the time)
Postprandial glucose <160 mg/dL
(Two hours after the start of a meal the BG should
be no more than 20 to 40 mg/dL above the pre-meal BG)
Bedtime glucose 100-160 mg/dL
International Diabetes Center
18. Blood Glucose Monitoring
To improve clinical decision-making
To adjust therapy
To evaluate efficacy of the therapy
To pin point problems
To support adherence to regimen
Feedback for the patient
Use glucose meter with verified data (memory with
date/time)
19. Redefining Pathophysiology of Type 2
Diabetes?
Impaired
Incretin Action
Insulin Relative Insulin
Resistance Deficiency
Pre-diabetes and
Type 2 Diabetes
20. Natural History of Type 2 Diabetes
350
(mg/dL)
Post-meal glucose
300
250
Fasting glucose
Glucose
200
150
100
50
Relative Function
250
200 Insulin resistance
150
100
Insulin level
50 β cell function
Incretin action
0
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Pre-diabetes Onset
Years
metabolic syndrome Diabetes
Adapted from: UKPDS 33: Lancet 1998; 352, 837-853 ; DeFronzo RA. Diabetes. 37:667, 1988; Saltiel J. Diabetes. 45:1661-1669, 1996.
Robertson RP. Diabetes. 43:1085, 1994; Tokuyama Y. Diabetes 44:1447, 1995. Polonsky KS. N Engl J Med 1996;334:777.
21. What is the relationship between
gaining weight and developing
insulin resistance?
22. Role of Obesity in Development of
Insulin Resistance
Central obesity is critical factor:
Waist to hip ratio >1
Waist >40 inches in men
Waist >35 inches in women
Abdominal adipose tissue is more
metabolically active than
subcutaneous fat.
Increased release of FFA, TNF-α
leading to insulin resistance.
FFA TNF-α Resistin
23. Elevated FFAs Play Key Role in Insulin
Resistance
Impaired Glucose-Stimulated
Insulin Secretion
↓Gluconeogenesis
↓ Glucose Uptake
FFA
↓ Glucose Uptake
24. Relative Insulin Deficiency
Decline In β -Cell Function
100
Loss of first-phase insulin secretion
75
β-Cell
Function* 50
(%)
IGT Postprandial Type 2 Type 2 diabetes
25 hyperglycemia diabetes phase III
phase I Type 2
diabetes
phase II
0
-12 -10 -6 -2 0 2 6 10 14
Years from Diagnosis
*HOMA = homeostasis model assessment; IGT = impaired glucose tolerance.
Dashed line shows extrapolation forward and backward from years 0 to 6 based on HOMA data from UKPDS.
Lebovitz. Diabetes Rev. 1999, 7:139-53.
UKPDS Group. UKPDS 16 Diabetes 1995, 44:1249-58.
25. Insulin Deficiency: Impaired β-Cell Function
Normal versus Type 2 Diabetes
200 mg/dL Glucose
Secreted Insulin (ng/
2.5
Normal
2.0
1.5
Diabetes
ml/islet)
1.0
0.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Time (hours)
Diabetes 1989; 38:673; DeFronzo et al. Diabetes Care. 1992;15:318-368
26. β cell Volume in Humans
Impact of Obesity and Glucose Intolerance
4
3
ß-cell volume (%)
-40%
2
-41%*
-63%
1
0
Body weight: Lean Obese
Glycemic status: Normal Diabetes Normal Impaired Diabetes
* % Difference between Normal and Diabetes
Butler AE et al. Diabetes. 2003;52:102–110.
27. Glucotoxicity Hypothesis
.
β-cells exposed to even mild chronic
hyperglycemia develop changes
characterized by dysfunctional insulin
secretion associated with altered gene
and protein expression.
28. What is the role of incretins?
A substance released by the gut in
response to food that stimulates insulin
secretion
Intestine Secretion Insulin = Incretin
Possible candidates: amino acids, lipids,
hormones, peptides (proteins)
Currently two well-described incretins
– Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)
– Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP)
32. Incretin Effect in Subjects without and with Type 2
Diabetes Given Glucose by IV and Orally
Control Subjects Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
(n=8) (n=14)
0.6 0.6
80 80
Incretin
Effect 0.5 0.5
60 60
IR Insulin, mU/L
IR Insulin, mU/L
0.4 0.4
nmol/L
nmol / L
40 0.3 40 0.3
0.2 0.2
20 20
0.1 0.1
0 0 0 0
0 60 120 180 0 60 120 180
Time, min Time, min
Oral glucose load Intravenous (IV) glucose infusion
Nauck M et al., Diabetologia 1986; 29:46–52.
33. Incretin Action: Role of Glucagon Like
Peptide -1 (GLP-1)
CNS Effects: Promotes
satiety and reduction
of appetite
LIVER
Less glucagon = less
hepatic glucose output
BETA CELL
Increases insulin
secretion
ALPHA CELL STOMACH
Decreases post-meal Slows gastric
glucagon secretion emptying
Ahren B Curr Diab Rep 2003; 3:365-372.
Baggio LL and Drucker DJ. Gastroenterology 2007; 132:2131-2157.
34. How GLP-1 is Rapidly Degraded by DPP-4
Active GLP-1
His Ala Glu Gly Thr Phe Thr SerAsp Val Ser Ser Tyr Leu Glu Gly Gln Ala Ala Lys Glu Phe
Ile
Ala
DPP-4
Arg Gly Lys Val Leu Trp
DPP-4 Cleaves Here
(Half-life = 60-90 seconds)
Inactive GLP-1
(can’t bind to GLP-1 receptor)
Glu Gly Thr Phe Thr SerAsp Val Ser Ser Tyr Leu Glu Gly Gln Ala Ala Lys Glu Phe
Ile
+ Ala
Arg Gly Lys Val Leu Trp
His Ala
Meier et al., Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2005; 21:91–117.
35. What is the role of Dipeptidyl-Peptidase 4
(DPP-4)?
DPP-4 is a ubiquitous(present everywhere)
serine protease
High levels in lumen of intestine, liver,
lung, kidney
Membrane-bound and free-circulating form
Multiple Substrates
Incretins (GLP-1, GIP)
Hormones (prolactin, IGF-1, luteinizing hormone)
Neuropeptides (substance P, neuropeptide Y)
Chemokines (CCL22)
Expressed on surface of T-cells
T-cell activation and other immunological
responses
Idris and Donnelly, Diabetes,Obesity and Metab. 2007; 9:153–165.
36. Are type 2 diabetes
and pre-diabetes
part of a larger syndrome
that contains a constellation of
additional metabolic
abnormalities?
37. National Cholesterol Education Program
Definition of Metabolic Syndrome
Any three of the following:
Risk Factor Defining Level
Abdominal obesity Waist circumference
Men: > 40 in (>102 cm)
Women: > 35 in (>88 cm)
Triglycerides > 150 mg/dL
HDL-C Men: < 40 mg/dL
Women: < 50 mg/dL
Blood pressure > 135/85 mm/Hg
Fasting glucose > 100 mg/dL
NCEP ATP III. JAMA 2001, 285:2486.
44. Insulin Sensitizer: Metformin
Action Precautions and
– Decreases liver glucose contraindications
production • Kidney disease: serum
creatinine >1.4 F, >1.5 M
Clinical indicators (eGFR <60 ?)(<30???????)
– Effective at any BMI • Liver disease: if present or if
– A1C <9% as monotherapy excessive alcohol intake,
– High fasting blood glucose metabolic acidosis
(160-250 mg/dL) • Heart disease: Active cardiac
– Dyslipidemia or pulmonary disease
• Surgical procedures: Hold
Side effects metformin at time of, or prior to,
– GI distress (affecting weight iodinated contrast dye
loss?)
– Metallic taste
Blonde et al. The Endocrinologist 1996:6:431-438.
Ong et al. Diabetes Care 29:2361-2364, 2006
47. Targeting Therapies to the Natural
History of Type 2 Diabetes
Metformin Insulin
Thiazolidinediones (TZD)
GLP-1 Agonist Secretagogues
DPP-4 Inhibitors Alphaglucosidase inhibitors
Medical
Nutrition
Therapy Insulin Resistance
Insulin Level
Pre Diabetes
Metabolic Syndrome Impaired Incretin Action
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Onset
Diabetes
Clinical
Diagnosis
Years
48. Insulin Sensitizer: Thiazolidinedione
Pioglitazone (Actos®) and Rosiglitazone (Avandia®)
Action Precautions and
Contraindications
Improves insulin sensitivity
Kidney Disease: monitor
Clinical indicators volume status
Insulin resistance Liver Disease: don’t
Overweight/obese initiate therapy if ALT>2.5X
upper limit of normal, more
High fasting blood glucose
monitoring for mildly
Metabolic syndrome elevated ALTs
Side effects Heart Disease: Evidence
of NYHA class III or IV
Edema (concern with CHF)
cardiac status
Weight gain
Pregnancy
49. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs)
Adverse Effects and Safety
Black box warning for CHF
Observe patient for rapid weight gain,
edema, dyspnea
Peripheral edema
2-7% of subjects in clinical trials
Increased risk of bone fracture in women and men
Hand, wrist, and hip
Hepatic safety
Pio/rosiglitazone - no increased risk of abnormal liver
function studies; interval monitoring of ALT still advised
Grey et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92:1305–1310;
Meier et al. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168:820-825.
51. Targeting Therapies to the Natural
History of Type 2 Diabetes
Insulin
Thiazolidinediones (TZD)
GLP-1 Agonist Secretagogues
DPP-4 Inhibitors Alphaglucosidase inhibitors
Medical
Nutrition
Metformin
Therapy Insulin Resistance
Insulin Level
Pre Diabetes
Metabolic Syndrome Impaired Incretin Action
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Onset
Diabetes
Clinical
Diagnosis
Years
52. Insulin Secretion: Normal vs.
Type 2 Diabetes
200 mg/dL Glucose
2.5
Secreted Insulin
Normal
(ng/ml/islet)
2.0
1.5
Diabetes
1.0
0.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Time (hours)
Diabetes 1989; 38:673.
53. Insulin Secretagogues
Glipizide (Glucotrol®), Glyburide (Diabeta®), Glimepiride
(Amaryl®), Repaglinide (Prandin®), and Nateglinide (Starlix®)
Action Side effects
• Releases insulin from • Weight gain
pancreas in response to a Hypoglycemia
glucose challenge
Precautions and
• Repaglinide and
Nateglinide have a short
contraindications
half-life • Kidney disease: use with
caution
Clinical Indicators
• Liver disease
• Insulin deficiency
• Pregnancy
• Leaner patients
• High postprandial
BG 200-300 mg/dL
54. Monotherapy Failure at 5 Years
ADOPT Study; FPG >180 mg/dL
Kahn et al., NEJM 2006; 355:2427-2443.
55. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor
Sitagliptin (Januvia) and Saxagliptin (Onglyza)
Action DPP-4 Inh.
Selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase -4 (DPP-4)
Increases GLP-1 levels 2-3 fold
Enhances insulin secretion, reduces glucagon levels
DPP-4 X His Ala Glu Gly Thr Phe Thr Ser Asp Val Ser Ser Tyr Leu Glu Gly Gln Ala Ala Lys Glu
Phe
Ile
Ala
Trp
Gly Lys Val Leu
Side effects
Arg
Very well tolerated; very low risk of hypoglycemia
Weight neutral
Precautions and contraindications
Kidney disease; adjust dosage
Pregnancy (Category B)
56. Sitagliptin and Metformin
Monotherapy and Combination
Duration 24 weeks; Baseline A1C = 8.8%
n=175 n=178 n=177 n=183 n=178
0
Mean A1C Reduction (%)
-0.5
(-0.8)
(-1.0)
-1 Sita
100 mg Met (-1.3)
qd 500 mg
-1.5 bid Met (-1.6)
1000 mg
bid Sita 50 mg
-2 + Met (-2.1)
500 mg
bid Sita 50 mg
-2.5 + Met
1000 mg
bid
Goldstein et al. Diab Care 2007; 30:1979-1987.
57. DPP-4 Inhibitor vs. Sulfonylurea
Change in A1C
Depending on baseline A1C Change in Weight
S
U
DPP-
4
58. New
Summary of Available DPP-4 Inhibitors
Medication Indications Dose HbA1c ↓
Sitagliptin (Januvia®) Monotherapy, metformin, 100 mg 0.6-0.9%
TZD, sulfonylurea daily*
Vildagliptin (Galvus®)** Metformin, TZD 50 mg 2x/ 0.6-1.0%
(not available in US) day
Sulfonylurea 50 mg daily
Saxagliptin (Onglyza®) Monotherapy, metformin, 2.5 or 5 mg 0.6-0.9%
TZD, sulfonylurea daily***
*Dose adjustment for renal disease: CrCl ≥30-49 mL/min: 50 mg daily;
CrCl <30 mL/min: 25 mg daily
** Contraindicated for patients with liver impairment
***Dose adjustment for renal disease: CrCl<50 mL/min: 2.5 mg daily
59. Targeting Therapies to the Natural
History of Type 2 Diabetes
Insulin
GLP-1 Agonist
DPP-4 Inhibitors Alphaglucosidase inhibitors
Medical
Nutrition Metformin Thiazolidinediones (TZD)
Therapy Insulin Resistance
Secretagogues
Insulin Level
Pre Diabetes
Metabolic Syndrome Impaired Incretin Action
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Onset
Diabetes
Clinical
Diagnosis
Years
60. Alpha-Glucosidase Inhibitor
Acarbose (Precose®) and Miglitol (Glyset®)
Action Precautions and
– Delays carbohydrates contraindications
absorption by interfering Kidney disease: Serum
with their breakdown creatinine >2.0 mg/dL
Clinical indicators Liver disease: Evidence of
– Insulin deficiency/ severe disease
insulin resistance Heart disease: none
– A1C<8% as monotherapy Inflammatory bowel
– High post-prandial disease
blood glucose Pregnancy
Side effects
– Flatulence, abdominal pain,
and diarrhea
– Generally poorly tolerated
61. Targeting Therapies to the Natural
History of Type 2 Diabetes
Insulin
GLP-1 Agonist
Alphaglucosidase inhibitors
Medical
Nutrition Metformin Thiazolidinediones (TZD)
Therapy Insulin Resistance
Secretagogues
DPP-4 Inhibitors Insulin Level
Pre Diabetes
Metabolic Syndrome Impaired Incretin Action
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Onset
Diabetes
Clinical
Diagnosis
Years
62. Incretin Mimetic (GLP-1 Analog)
Exenatide (Byetta®)
Action
– Enhances glucose-dependent insulin secretion
– Slows gastric emptying
– Reduce food intake
Clinical Indicators
– Elevated postmeal BG
– In combination with metformin, sulfonylurea, thiazolidinedione or
metformin/sulfonylurea
Side effects
– Nausea (~40% patients) vomiting (13%) and diarrhea (13%)
– Hypoglycemia with sulfonylurea
Precautions and Contraindications
– Kidney Disease: Creatine Clearance <30 ml/min
– Gastrointestinal disease
– Pregnancy (Category C)
63. Effect of Exenatide in Combination
with Oral Therapies
Baseline vs. 30 weeks
5 µg BID 10 µg BID Placebo
0.4
Change in A1C (%) from Baseline
Baseline Baseline Baseline
A1C 8.7% A1C 8.5% A1C 8.6%
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4 P<0.001
-0.6
P<0.0001
P<0.0001
-0.8 P<0.001 P<0.0001
P<0.0001
-1
Exenatide Exenatide + Exenatide +
+ Metformin Sulfonylurea Met and SU
Buse JB, Diabetes Care 2004; 27:2628–2635.
Defronzo RA, Diabetes Care 2005; 28:1092–1100.
Kendall DM, Diabetes Care 2005; 28:1083–1091.
64. When to Inject Exenatide
Placebo
-60 minutes
Plasma glucose (mg/dL)
Meal -15 minutes
250 0 minutes
+30 minutes
200
+60 minutes
150
100
50
-60 0 60 120 180 240 300 360
Time after meal (minutes)
N=18, randomized, six way crossover study, with fixed breakfast
Linnebjerg et al., Diab Med 2006; 23:240–245.
65. Liraglutide (Victoza®)
GLP-1 analog
Half-life 13 hours, resistant to DPP-4 degradation
Daily injection (weekly titration 0.6 mg to 1.2 mg to 1.8 mg)
G.I. Side effects common (~15-30% report nausea; 10-15%
report diarrhea) and transient in nature
Approved January, 2010, not recommended as first-line therapy,
rather in combination with Met, SU, TZDs
His Ala Glu Gly Thr Phe Thr Ser Asp Val Ser Ser Tyr Leu Glu Gly Gln Ala Ala Lys Glu Phe
Gly Ile
Ala
Trp
eu
Albumin A rg V
al L
Gly
Arg
Gly
66. Liraglutide (Victoza®) Precautions and
Contraindications
Not for treatment of type 1 DM
Has not been studied in combination with insulin
Not studied in patients with history of pancreatitis
7 cases pancreatitis vs. 1 in comparator
(2.2 vs. 0.6 cases /1000 pts years)
67. Liraglutide vs. Sulfonylurea (LEAD-3)
Effects on A1C and Weight at 52 Weeks
Change in A1C (%) from Baseline
Baseline A1C 8.3% Baseline Weight ~205 lbs
0 6
Change in Weight (lbs) from Baseline
-0.2 4
-0.4 2
-0.6 0
-0.8 -2
-1 -4
-1.2 -6
1.2 mg 1.8 mg Glimepiride 1.2 mg 1.8 mg Glimepiride
n=251 n=247 n=248 n=251 n=247 n=248
Garber et al. Lancet 2009; 373:438-449
68. Targeting Therapies to the Natural
History of Type 2 Diabetes
Insulin
GLP-1 Agonist
Medical
Nutrition Metformin Thiazolidinediones (TZD)
Therapy Insulin Resistance
Secretagogues Alphaglucosidase inhibitors
DPP-4 Inhibitors Insulin Level
Pre Diabetes
Metabolic Syndrome Impaired Incretin Action
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Onset
Diabetes
Clinical
Diagnosis
Years
69. The Burden of Type 2 Diabetes
Treatment Failure
Mean A1C at Last Visit*
10 9.6%
8.9% Combination
(%)
9 8.6% oral agents
SU or
Diet and metformin
8 Exercise
7
ADA Goal 2.5 Years 2.9 Years 2.8 Years Initiation
8.2 Years of
insulin therapy
Years Elapsed Since Initial Diagnosis
*Adapted from: Brown JB et al. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1535-1540.
70. The Role of Insulin Therapy
Critical role in both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes
Greatest potency of available therapies
Demonstrated benefit – multiple clinical trials
Impaired
Insulin Incretin Action
Deficiency Insulin Relative Insulin
Resistance Deficiency
Type 1 Diabetes Pre-diabetes and
Type 2 Diabetes
71. Clinical Indicators for Insulin
in Type 2 Diabetes
Initiate if:
A1C >7% for 3 months and on maximum effective dose of
2 or more glucose-lowering agents
Symptomatic and glucose >300 mg/dL
If clinically stable and high intake of sweetened
Beverages (>36 oz or 3 cans/day), eliminate sweetened
Beverages and re-evaluate need for insulin in 1-2 weeks
Staged Diabetes Management Quick Guide 5th Edition, 2009
Need insulin to get fat in and keep it there. Other (??)
Lipid Management in Clinical Practice - Section 1
A study investigated whether reduced beta-cell mass could contribute to impaired insulin secretion, a main characteristic of type 2 diabetes. To this aim, pancreatic tissue from 124 autopsies was examined and beta-cell mass measured in 91 obese individuals (41 with type 2 diabetes, 15 with impaired fasting glucose, and 35 nondiabetic) and in 33 lean subjects (16 with type 2 diabetes and 17 nondiabetic). A significant reduction in beta-cell mass was observed in obese individuals with type 2 diabetes (–63%, P <0.01) and in individuals with impaired fasting glucose (–40%, P <0.05) compared with obese nondiabetic individuals. Lean individuals with type 2 diabetes also had a significant reduction in beta-cell mass (–41%, P <0.05) compared with lean nondiabetic individuals. Thus, beta-cell mass is decreased in patients with type 2 diabetes. Slide provided by Dr. Leahy — for training use only.
Slide Index ARC-GL0011 L: A,B,C DISCUSSION POINTS: These data show that postprandial GLP-1 concentrations are reduced in subjects with type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). The top line represents GLP-1 concentrations in subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT). GLP-1 concentrations are statistically significantly reduced in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to NGT subjects from t=60 min to 150 min. SLIDE BACKGROUND: Fifty-four subjects with type 2 diabetes (BMI 30.2 kg/m2, age 55.9 y, A1C 8.4%), 15 IGT (BMI 35.0 kg/m2, age 55.3 y, A1C 6.1%), and 33 NGT (BMI 29.6 kg/m2, age 56.2 y, A1C 5.9%). All antidiabetic medications were discontinued 3 days prior to study during which time subjects were fed a mixed meal (t=0) and blood samples taken for 6 subsequent hours. Plasma concentration of GLP-1 were measured by means of RIA specific for C-terminus of GLP-1, which measures the sum of GLP-1 (7-36) amide and its metabolite GLP-1 (9-36) amide.
DISCUSSION POINTS: Food elicits dynamic changes in insulin secretion, beginning with the so-called cephalic phase, in which anticipation of a meal releases insulin. This is mediated by the CNS. An early prandial phase, mediated by gut-derived incretin hormones (eg, GLP-1 and GIP) occurs after food intake but before the ingested nutrients appear in the circulation. To identify the contributions of these endogenous substances, 6 young healthy subjects were first given increasing oral glucose loads of 25 g, 50 g, and 100 g. They then received an isoglycemic intravenous glucose infusion that was designed to mimic the plasma profile achieved by the oral load. 1 The intravenous glucose bypassed the gastrointestinal tract and therefore enabled an investigation of the role of incretins. Shown here (left chart) is the response to 50 g oral glucose compared with the matched intravenous infusion, demonstrating essentially identical rises and falls in plasma glucose. Yet the insulin secretory response (β-cell responses), demonstrated here by the connecting peptide (C-peptide) concentrations, were dramatically different (right chart). The oral challenge was followed by a robust increase in C-peptide levels. In contrast, insulin secretion following the isoglycemic intravenous glucose infusion was significantly less. The difference is ascribed to incretins, which are secreted in response to the presence of food in the GI tract and not when glucose is administered parenterally. The incretin effect thus refers to the difference in the magnitude of insulin secretion seen after glucose is ingested compared with that seen after an isoglycemic intravenous infusion. These findings suggest that incretins, and not merely the direct actions of glucose, affect the insulin secretory response. Reference: Nauck MA, Homberger E, Siegel EG, et al. Incretin effects of increasing glucose loads in man calculated from venous insulin and C-peptide responses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab . 1986;63:492-498.
The Incretin Effect in Subjects Without and With Type 2 Diabetes In 1964, it was demonstrated that the insulin secretory response was greater when glucose was administered orally through the GI tract than when glucose was delivered via intravenous (IV) infusion. The term incretin effect was coined to describe this response involving the stimulatory effect of gut hormones known as incretins on pancreatic secretion. 1,2 The incretin effect implies that nutrient ingestion causes the gut to release substances that enhance insulin secretion beyond the release caused by the rise in glucose secondary to absorption of digested nutrients. 1 Studies in humans and animals have shown that the incretin hormones GLP-1 and GIP account for almost all of the incretin effect, 3 stimulating insulin release when glucose levels are elevated. 4,5 Although the incretin effect is detectable in both healthy subjects and those with diabetes, it is abnormal in those with diabetes, as demonstrated by the study shown on the slide. 6 In this study, patients with type 2 diabetes and weight-matched metabolically healthy control subjects were given glucose either orally or IV to achieve an isoglycemic load. 6 In those without diabetes (shown on the left), the plasma insulin response to an oral glucose load was far greater than the plasma insulin response to an IV glucose load (incretin effect) — that is, the pancreatic beta cells secreted much more insulin when the glucose load was administered through the GI tract. 6 In patients with type 2 diabetes (shown on the right), the same effect was observed but was diminished in magnitude. 6 The diminished incretin effect observed in patients with type 2 diabetes may be due to reduced responsiveness of pancreatic beta cells to GLP-1 and GIP or to impaired secretion of the relevant incretin hormone. 7,8 References: 1. Creutzfeldt W. The incretin concept today. Diabetologia . 1979;16:75–85. 2. Creutzfeldt W. The [pre-] history of the incretin concept. Regul Pept . 2005;128:87–91. 3. Brubaker PL, Drucker DJ. Minireview: Glucagon-like peptides regulate cell proliferation and apoptosis in the pancreas, gut, and central nervous system. Endocrinology . 2004;145:2653–2659. 4. Drucker DJ. Biological actions and therapeutic potential of the glucagon-like peptides. Gastroenterology . 2002;122:531–544. 5. Ahrén B. Gut peptides and type 2 diabetes mellitus treatment. Curr Diab Rep . 2003;3:365–372. 6. Nauck M, Stöckmann F, Ebert R, Creutzfeldt W. Reduced incretin effect in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes. Diabetologia . 1986;29:46–52. 7. Creutzfeldt W. The entero-insular axis in type 2 diabetes—incretins as therapeutic agents. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes . 2001;109(suppl 2):S288–S303. 8. Nauck MA, Heimesaat MM, Ørskov C, Holst JJ, Ebert R, Creutzfeldt W. Preserved incretin activity of glucagon-like peptide 1 [7-36 amide] but not of synthetic human gastric inhibitory polypeptide in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest . 1993;91:301–307.
Key Points: An example of the insulin deficiency associated with type 2 diabetes is shown in this study using a hyperglycemic clamp to demonstrate the difference between individuals with normoglycemia and type 2 diabetes. The Beta Cell dysfunction that follows is characterized by the loss of first phase insulin secretion followed by reduction in second phase insulin secretion characterized by a reduction in beta cell mass. First phase insulin secretion provides a burst of insulin secreted in response to the initial rise in blood glucose after eating a meal. With time second phase insulin secretion is further diminished by beta cell mass decline, resulting in progressive loss of insulin response. This process reinforces the concept of the natural history of type 2 DM
Brown et al estimated glycemic burden that accumulates from treatment failure in a prospective, population-based study in patients with type 2 diabetes completing courses of treatment with nondrug therapy diet and exercise, sulfonyluria monotherapy, metformin monotherapy, and combination oral antihyperglycemic therapy. The average patient accumulated nearly 5 A1C years of excess glycemic burden >8.0% from diagnosis until starting insulin and about 10 A1C years of burden <7.0%. These data support the concept that glucose-lowering treatments in type 2 diabetes should be changed much sooner or that treatments less likely to fail should be used. An action point at 7.0% or lower is more likely to prevent additional deterioration than the traditional action point of 8.0%. Reference 1. Brown JB, Nichols GA, Perry A. The burden of treatment therapy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care . 2004;27:1535-1540. Base A1C 7.0% D/E SU Metformin SU + Metformin Total glycemic burden (mo) 22.5±32.0 41.5±43.4 33.5±34.7 58.3+46.2 Avoidable burden (mo) 15.8±24.6 36.6±39.6 25.9+30.1 51.1+41.6 [Brown/1537/B] [Brown/1538/B] [Brown/1537/E] [Brown/1537/D] [Brown/1537/B] [Brown/1537/B] [Brown/1537/C] [Brown/1538/B] [Brown/1537/C] [Brown/1538/A]
Key Points: Elevated fasting glucose indicates need for basal insulin to suppress gluconeogenesis overnight. With basal insulin, patient needs to be on at least one oral agent to address mealtime glucose excursions Elevated post-meal glucose indicates need for bolus insulin to cover meal related carbohydrate intake. Most common starting points are Basal Insulin and Mixed Insulin but both point to Basal/Bolus regimen of increased flexibility. Note page reference (3-5) to 4 th edition Quick Guide to get people into the SDM materials. Insulin detemir is a new basal insulin that is expected to be approved by FDA by the end of 2005.