SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 10
Download to read offline
IS : 875 ( Part 4 ) - 1987
( Reaffirmed 1997 )
Indian Standard
CODE OF PRACTICE,FOR
DESIGN LOADS ( OTHER THAN EARTHQUAKE )
FOR BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES
PART 4 SNOW LOADS
(Second Revision).
Fourtll Rcprjnt OCTOBER 1997
UDC 624.042-42 : 006.7
@ Copyright 1988
B U R E A U O F I N D I A N S T A N D A R D S
MANAK BHAVAN, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG
NEW DELHI 110002
Gr 4 October 1988
fndian Standard
CODEOFPRACTICE
IS:875(Bart4)-1987
FOR
DESIGNLOADS(OTHERTHANEARTHQUAKE)
FORBUILDINGSAND STRUCTURES r.PART 4 SNOW LOADS
(Second Revision)
0. F O R E W O R D
0.1 This Indian Standard ( Part4 ) ( Second
Revision ) was adopted by the Bureau of Indian
Standards on 9 November 1987, after the draft
finalized by the Structural Safety Sectional
Committee had been approved by the Civil
Engineering Division Council.
0.2 A building has to perform many functions
satisfactorily. Amongst these functions are the
utility of the building for the intended use and
occupancy. structural safety, fire safety; and
compliance with hygienic, sanitation, ventilation
and daylight standards. The design of the build-
ing is dependent upon the minimum requirements
prescribed for each of the above functions. The
minimum requirements pertaining to the structural
safety of buildings are being covered in this Code
by way of laying down minimum design loads which
have to be assumed for dead loads, imposed loads,
wind loads, snow loads and other external loads,
the structure would be required to bear. Strict
conformity to loading standards recommended in
this Code, it is hoped, will not only ensure the
structural safety of the buildings which are being
designed and constructed in the country and
thereby reduce the hazards to life and property
caused by unsafe structures, but also eliminate the
wastage caused by assuming unnecessarily heavy
loadings. Notwithstanding what is stated regarding
the structural safety of buildings, the application of
the provisions should be carried out by compe-
tent and responsible structural designer who would
satisfy himself that the structure designed in
accordance with this code meets the desired
performance requirements when the same is
carried out according to specifications.
0.3 This Code was first published in 1957 for the
guidance of civil engineers, designers and archi-
tects associated with the planning and design of
buildings. It included the provisions for the
basic design loads ( dead loads, live loads, wind
loads and seismic loads ) to be assumed in the
design of buildings. In its first revision in 1964,
the wind pressure provisions were modified on
the basis of studies of wind phenomenon and its
effects on structures undertaken by the special
committee in consultation with the Indian Meteo-
rological Department. In addition to this, new
clauses on wind loads for butterfly type structures
were included; wind pressure coefficients for
sheeted roofs, both curved and sloping, were
modified; seismic load provisions were deleted
( separate code having been prepared ) and metric
system of weights and measurements was adopted.
0.3.1 With the increased adoption of the Code,
a number of comments were received on the pro-
visions on live load values adopted for different
occupancies. Simultaneously live loads surveys
have been carried out in America, Canada and
other countries to arrive at realistic live loads
based on actual determination of loading( mov-
able and immovable ) in different occupancies.
Keeping this in view and other developments in
the field of wind engineering, the Sectional Com-
mittee responsible for the preparation of this
standard has decided to prepare the second
revision in the following five parts:
Part 1 Dead Loads
Part 2 Imposed Loads
Part 3 Wind Loads
Part 4 Snow Loads
Part 5 Special Loads and Load Combinations
Earthquake load is covered in IS : 1893-1984*
which should be considered along with the above
loads.
0.3.2 This part ( Part 4 ) deals with snow loads
on roofs of buildings.
The committee responsible for the prepara-
tion of the code while reviewing the available
snow-fall data, felt the paucity of data on which
to make specific recommendations on the depth
of ground snow load for different regions effected
by snow-fall, In due course the characteristic
*Criteria for earthquake resistant designing of strue-
trues (fourth revision ).
1
IS:875(Part4)-1987
snow load on ground for different regions will ‘Basis for design of structures - Determination
be included based on studies. of snow loads on roofs’, issued by the Interna-
0.4 This part is based on IS0 4355-198 1 ( E )
tional Organization for Standardization.
1. SCOPE
1.1 This standard (Part 4) deals with snow loads
on roofs of buildings. Roofs should be designed
for the actual load due to snow or for the &posed
loads specified in Part 2 Imposed loads, whichever
is more severe.
NOTB - Mountainous regions in northern parts of
India are subjected to snow-fall.
In India, parts of Jammu and Kashmir ( Baramulah
District, Srinagar District, Anantnag District and
Ladakh District ); Punjab, Himachal Pradesh
( Chamba, Kulu, Kinnaur District, Mahasu District,
Mandi District, Sirmur District and Simla District);
and Uttar Pradesh ( Dehra Dun District, Tehri Garhwal
District, Almora District and Nainital District ) experi-
ence snow-fall of varying depths two to three times in
a year.
2. NOTATIONS
3.
3.1
p ( Dimensionless) - Nominal values of the
shape coefficients, tak-
ing into account snow
drifts, sliding snow,
etc, with subscripts, if
necessary.
Ij ( in metres ) - Horizontal dimensions
with numerical sub-
scripts, if necessary.
hj ( in metres ) - Vertical dimensions
with numerical sub-
. scripts, if necessary.
fii (in degrees) - Roof slope.
so (in pascals ) - Snow load on ground.
SI ( in pascals ) - Snow load on roofs.
SNOW LOAD IN ROOF (S)
The minimum design snow load on a roof
area or any other area above ground which is
subjected to snow accumulation is obtained by
multiplying the snow load on ground, s, by the
shape coefficient CL, as applicable to the particular
roof area considered.
S=c(S0
where
s = design snow load in Pa on plan area
of roof,
p = shape coefficient ( see 4), and
so = ground snow load in Pa
( 1 Pa = lN/ma ).
NOTE - Ground snow load at any place depends on
the critical combinati.m of the maximum depth of un-
disturbed aggregate cumulative snow-fall and its
average density. In due course the characteristic snow
load on ground for different regions will be included
based on studies. Till such time the users of this
standard are advised to contanct either Snow and
Avalanches Study Establishment ( Defence Research
and Development Organization ) Manali ( HP) or
Indian Meteorological Department ( IMD ), Pune in
the absence of any specific information for any
location.
4. SHAPE COEFFICIENTS
4.1 General Principles
In perfectly calm weather, falling snow would
cover roofs and the ground with a uniform blanket
of snow and the design snow load could be consi-
derd as .a uniformly distributed load. Truly uni-
form loading conditions, however, are rare and
have usually only been observed in areas that are
sheltered on all sides by high trees, buildings, etc.
In such a case, the shape coefficient would be
equal to untiy.
In most regions, snow falls are accompanied
or followed by winds. The winds will redistribute
the snow and on some roofs, especially multi-
level roofs, the accumulated drift load may reach
a multiple of the ground load. Roofs which are
sheltered by other buildings, vegetation, etc, may
collect more snow load than the ground level.
The phenomenon is of the same nature as that
illustrated for multilevel roofs in 4.2.4.
So far sufficient data are not available to deter-
mine the shape coefficient in a statistical basis.
Therefore, a nominal value is given. A representa-
tive sample of rcof is shown in 4.2. However, in
special cases such as strip loading, cleaning of the
roof periodically by deliberate heating of the roof,
etc, have to be treated separately.
The distribution of snow in the direction
parallel to the eaves is assumed to be uniform.
2
4.2 Shape Coefficients for Selected Types of Roofs
4.2.1 Simple Flat and
Monopitch Roofs
Simple Pitched Roofs
(Positive Roof Slope)*
p, = 0.8
4.2.2 Simple or Multiple Pitched Roofs
(Negative Roof Slope)
Two-Span or Multispan
Roofs
o*<p<3l
E3&#<6
49>60*
t+.= p, =O.%
t'2~=0.8+04(~)
jL, =0*8
Pl**
pp1-6
m-0
l For.asymmetrical simple Pitched roofs, each side of the roof shall be treated as me half of corresponding
symmetwal roofs.
3
Is:875(Partl)-1987
4.2.3 Simple Curved Roofs
The following cases 1 and 2 must be examined:
CASE 2
Restriction:
h<F3
a-OifB>60’
4
Is:875(Part4)-1987
4.2.4 Multilevel Roofs*
91 = 0’8
Bs = Ps + Pa
where
A - due to sliding
pw - due to wind
1, = 2ht but is restricted as follows:
SmCls<lSm
11 + f, < kh
PW=T -
SO
with the restriction 0.8 < pw ( 4’0
where
h is in metres
so is in kilopascals ( kilonewtons per square metre )
k =2kN/m8
p > 19” : ps is determined from an additional load amounting to SO percent of the maximum total load on the
adjacent slope of the upper roofs, and is distributed linearly as shown on the figure.
B < 15” : ps = 0
*A more extensive formula for pw is described in Appendix A.
tlf1~ < I,. the coe5cient p is determined by interpolation between JJ, and ps.
SThe load on the upper roof is calculated according to 4.2.1 or 4.2.2.
5
4.25 Complex Multilevel Roofs
c
1, - 2h1: h - 2h,: p1 - 0’8
Restriction:
Sm< I,< Urn;
Sm<b<lSm;
11 and BW ( ccl + @W ), are calculated according to 4.2.1,4.2.2 and 4.2.4.
6
I.S:875(Part4)-1987
4.2.6 Roofs with Local Projections and Obstructions
where
/I is in metres
sO is in kilopascals (kilonewtons per square metre)
k I= 2 kN/ma
/I1 = 0.8
1=2/l
Kestrictions:
0’8 < /Ia < 2-O
Sm41615m
4.3 Shape Coefficients in Areas Exposed to Wind
The shape coefficients given in 4.2 and Appen-
dix A may be reduced by 25 percent provided the
designer has demonstrated that the following con-
ditions are fulfilled:
4
b)
The building is located in an exposed
location such as open level terrain with
only scattered buildings, trees or other
obstructions so that the roof is exposed
to the winds on all sides and is ndt
likely to become shielded in the future
by obstructions higher than the roof
within a distance from the building equal
to ten times the height of the obstruction
above the roof level;
The roof does not have any significant
projections such as parapet walls which
may prevent snow from being blown off
the roof.
NOTE - In some areas, winter climate may not be
of such a nature as to produce a significant reduction
of roof loads from the snow load on the ground. These
areas are:
a) Winter calm valleys in the mountains where some-
times layer after layer of snow accumulates on
roofs without any appreciable
wind; and
removal of snow by
b) Areas (that is, high temperature) where the maxi-
mum snow load may be the result of single snow-
storm,
removal.
occasionally without appreciable wind
In such areas, the determination of the shape coeffi-
cients shall be based on local experience with due
regard to the likelihood of wind drifting and sliding.
5. ICE LOAD ON WIRES
5.1 Ice loads are required to be taken into account
in the design of overhead electrical-transmission
and communication lines, over-head contact lines
for electric traction, aerial masts and similar
structures in zones subjected to ice formation.
The thickness of ice deposit alround may be taken
to be between 3 and 10 mm depending upon the
location of the structure. The mass density of
ice may be assumed to be equal to O-9 g/cm”.
While considering the wind force on wires and
cables, the increase in diameter due to ice forma-
tion shall be taken into consideration.
7
IS:875(Part4)-1987
A P P E N D I X A
( Clauses 42.4 and 4.3 )
SHAPE COEFFICIENTS FOR MULTILEVEL ROOFS
A more comprehensive formula for the shape coefficient for multilevel roofs than that
given in 4.2.4 is as follows:
-- WIN0OIRECTIONS
c
Pr -1+ + ( ml iI + mI 1, )( 1, - 2 h )
Cl = 0’8
i,=hh
fh and I being in metres)
Restriction :
where
so is in kilopascals (kilonewtons per square metre)
k is in newtons per cubic metre
I,< ISm
Values of m, ( mr ) for the higher ( lower ) roof depend on its profile and are taken as equal to:
0.5 for plane roofs with slopes @ < 20’ and vaulted roofs with f< +-
0’3 for plane roofs with slopes p > 20” and vaulted roofs with f>$
The coefficients m, and ma may be adjusted to take into account conditions for transfer of snow on the roof
surface ( that is, wind, temperature, etc. ).
NOTE - The other condition of loading also shall be tried.
Bureau of Indian Standards
BIS is a statutory institution established under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 to promote
harmonious development of the activities of standardization, marking and quality certification of goods and
attending to connected matters in the country.
Copyright
BIS has the copyright of all its publications. No part of these publications may be reproduced in any form
without the prior permission in writing of BIS. This does not preclude the free use, in the course of
implementing the standard, of necessary detaik, such as symbols and sizes, type or grade designations.
Enquiries relating to copyright be addressed to the Director (Publication), BIS.
Review of Indian Standards
Amendments are issued to standards as the need arises on the basis of comments. Standards are also reviewed
periodically; a standard along with amendments is reaffirmed when such review indicates that no changes are
needed; if the review indicates that changes are needed, it is taken up for revision. Users of Indian Standards
should ascertain that they are in possession of the latest amendments or edition by referring to the latest issue
of ‘BIS Handbook’ and ‘Standards Monthly Additions’.
Amendments Issued Since Publication
Amend No. Date of Issue Text Affected
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS
Headquarters:
Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110002
Telephones: 323 0131,323 33 75,323 94 02
Regional Offices:
Telegrams: Manaksanstha
(Common to all offices)
Telephone
Central : Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg
NEW DELHI 110002
Eastern :
Northern :
l/14 C.I.T. Scheme VII M, V.I.P. Road, Maniktola
CALCUTTA 700054
SCO.335336, Sector 34-A CHANDIGARH 160022
Southern : C.I.T. Campus, IV Cross Road, CHENNAI 600113
Western :
Branches :
Manakalaya, E9 MIDC, Marol, Andheri (East)
MUMBAI 400093
AHMADABAD. BANGALORE. BHOPAL. BHUBANESHWAR.
COIMBATORE. FARIDABAD. GHAZIABAD. GUWAHATI.
HYDERABAD. JAlPUR. KANPUR. LUCKNOW. NAGPUR.
PATNA. PUNE. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
323 76 17,323 38 41
337 84 99,337 85 61
337 86 26,337 9120
1
60 38 43
60 20 25
1
235 02 16,235 04 42
235 15 19,235 23 15
{
832 92 95,832 78 58
832 78 91,832 78 92
Printed by Reprography Unit, BIS, New Delhi

More Related Content

What's hot (15)

IS.875.2.1987
IS.875.2.1987IS.875.2.1987
IS.875.2.1987
 
IS 875-3-1987
IS 875-3-1987IS 875-3-1987
IS 875-3-1987
 
1893
18931893
1893
 
Is 875 wind load
Is 875   wind loadIs 875   wind load
Is 875 wind load
 
1893 1
1893 11893 1
1893 1
 
875 4
875 4875 4
875 4
 
1893 1
1893 11893 1
1893 1
 
Ap's IS-1893.1.2002
Ap's IS-1893.1.2002Ap's IS-1893.1.2002
Ap's IS-1893.1.2002
 
IS.1893.1.2002
IS.1893.1.2002IS.1893.1.2002
IS.1893.1.2002
 
E0344042054
E0344042054E0344042054
E0344042054
 
Is.1893.4.2005
Is.1893.4.2005Is.1893.4.2005
Is.1893.4.2005
 
Etabs BY Subash Pathak
Etabs BY Subash PathakEtabs BY Subash Pathak
Etabs BY Subash Pathak
 
875 2
875 2875 2
875 2
 
2974 2
2974 22974 2
2974 2
 
2185 3
2185 32185 3
2185 3
 

Viewers also liked

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RC BUILDINGS WITH SHEAR WALL
SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RC BUILDINGS WITH SHEAR WALLSEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RC BUILDINGS WITH SHEAR WALL
SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RC BUILDINGS WITH SHEAR WALLMohd Danish
 
Is 2185 1 1979(2003)
Is 2185 1  1979(2003)Is 2185 1  1979(2003)
Is 2185 1 1979(2003)Mohd Danish
 
EARTHQUAKE SAFE CONSTRUCTION OF MASONRY BUILDINGS
EARTHQUAKE SAFE CONSTRUCTION OF MASONRY BUILDINGSEARTHQUAKE SAFE CONSTRUCTION OF MASONRY BUILDINGS
EARTHQUAKE SAFE CONSTRUCTION OF MASONRY BUILDINGSMohd Danish
 
Rapid visual screening of critical facilities in the Kingston Metropolit
Rapid visual screening of critical facilities in the Kingston MetropolitRapid visual screening of critical facilities in the Kingston Metropolit
Rapid visual screening of critical facilities in the Kingston MetropolitChristopher Gayle M.Eng
 
EARTHQUAKE SAFE CONSTRUCTION OF MASONRY BUILDINGS
EARTHQUAKE SAFE CONSTRUCTION OF MASONRY BUILDINGSEARTHQUAKE SAFE CONSTRUCTION OF MASONRY BUILDINGS
EARTHQUAKE SAFE CONSTRUCTION OF MASONRY BUILDINGSMohd Danish
 
EFFECT OF STAIRCASE ON RC FRAME STRUCTURES UNDER SEISMIC LOAD
EFFECT OF STAIRCASE ON RC FRAME STRUCTURES UNDER SEISMIC LOADEFFECT OF STAIRCASE ON RC FRAME STRUCTURES UNDER SEISMIC LOAD
EFFECT OF STAIRCASE ON RC FRAME STRUCTURES UNDER SEISMIC LOADMohd Danish
 
RVS: Lecture ppt
RVS: Lecture pptRVS: Lecture ppt
RVS: Lecture pptMohd Danish
 
Sp34 str detailing
Sp34     str detailingSp34     str detailing
Sp34 str detailingMohd Danish
 
Sp20 masonry design_and_construction
Sp20 masonry design_and_constructionSp20 masonry design_and_construction
Sp20 masonry design_and_constructionMohd Danish
 
Is 3370 part 1 latest
Is 3370 part 1 latestIs 3370 part 1 latest
Is 3370 part 1 latestMohd Danish
 
Is 3370 part 2 latest
Is 3370 part 2 latestIs 3370 part 2 latest
Is 3370 part 2 latestMohd Danish
 

Viewers also liked (13)

Fema 240
Fema 240Fema 240
Fema 240
 
SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RC BUILDINGS WITH SHEAR WALL
SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RC BUILDINGS WITH SHEAR WALLSEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RC BUILDINGS WITH SHEAR WALL
SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RC BUILDINGS WITH SHEAR WALL
 
Is 2185 1 1979(2003)
Is 2185 1  1979(2003)Is 2185 1  1979(2003)
Is 2185 1 1979(2003)
 
EARTHQUAKE SAFE CONSTRUCTION OF MASONRY BUILDINGS
EARTHQUAKE SAFE CONSTRUCTION OF MASONRY BUILDINGSEARTHQUAKE SAFE CONSTRUCTION OF MASONRY BUILDINGS
EARTHQUAKE SAFE CONSTRUCTION OF MASONRY BUILDINGS
 
Rapid visual screening of critical facilities in the Kingston Metropolit
Rapid visual screening of critical facilities in the Kingston MetropolitRapid visual screening of critical facilities in the Kingston Metropolit
Rapid visual screening of critical facilities in the Kingston Metropolit
 
EARTHQUAKE SAFE CONSTRUCTION OF MASONRY BUILDINGS
EARTHQUAKE SAFE CONSTRUCTION OF MASONRY BUILDINGSEARTHQUAKE SAFE CONSTRUCTION OF MASONRY BUILDINGS
EARTHQUAKE SAFE CONSTRUCTION OF MASONRY BUILDINGS
 
EFFECT OF STAIRCASE ON RC FRAME STRUCTURES UNDER SEISMIC LOAD
EFFECT OF STAIRCASE ON RC FRAME STRUCTURES UNDER SEISMIC LOADEFFECT OF STAIRCASE ON RC FRAME STRUCTURES UNDER SEISMIC LOAD
EFFECT OF STAIRCASE ON RC FRAME STRUCTURES UNDER SEISMIC LOAD
 
RVS: Lecture ppt
RVS: Lecture pptRVS: Lecture ppt
RVS: Lecture ppt
 
Sp34 str detailing
Sp34     str detailingSp34     str detailing
Sp34 str detailing
 
Sp20 masonry design_and_construction
Sp20 masonry design_and_constructionSp20 masonry design_and_construction
Sp20 masonry design_and_construction
 
Sp16 latest
Sp16 latestSp16 latest
Sp16 latest
 
Is 3370 part 1 latest
Is 3370 part 1 latestIs 3370 part 1 latest
Is 3370 part 1 latest
 
Is 3370 part 2 latest
Is 3370 part 2 latestIs 3370 part 2 latest
Is 3370 part 2 latest
 

Similar to 875 4

Loads considered while designing a building according to Indian standars
Loads considered while designing a building according to Indian standarsLoads considered while designing a building according to Indian standars
Loads considered while designing a building according to Indian standarsSrinivasRowthu
 
Chimney design &amp;engg code
Chimney design &amp;engg codeChimney design &amp;engg code
Chimney design &amp;engg codeVarun Nath
 
WIND LOAD ON BUILDING AND STR.pdf
WIND LOAD ON BUILDING AND STR.pdfWIND LOAD ON BUILDING AND STR.pdf
WIND LOAD ON BUILDING AND STR.pdfSachin Kumbhar
 
IS-1893-part1-2016-181029102047.pdf
IS-1893-part1-2016-181029102047.pdfIS-1893-part1-2016-181029102047.pdf
IS-1893-part1-2016-181029102047.pdfTapaswini Panigrahi
 
CSE_202_Chapter_4-1893-part-1-2016-1pdf.pdf
CSE_202_Chapter_4-1893-part-1-2016-1pdf.pdfCSE_202_Chapter_4-1893-part-1-2016-1pdf.pdf
CSE_202_Chapter_4-1893-part-1-2016-1pdf.pdfArjunanChandrasekara
 
Mechanical Design and Analysis of Steel Stack by Varying its Height with Cons...
Mechanical Design and Analysis of Steel Stack by Varying its Height with Cons...Mechanical Design and Analysis of Steel Stack by Varying its Height with Cons...
Mechanical Design and Analysis of Steel Stack by Varying its Height with Cons...IRJET Journal
 
determining_wind_and_snow_loads_for_solaR PANELS EXAPMPLE USA-1-1.pdf
determining_wind_and_snow_loads_for_solaR PANELS EXAPMPLE USA-1-1.pdfdetermining_wind_and_snow_loads_for_solaR PANELS EXAPMPLE USA-1-1.pdf
determining_wind_and_snow_loads_for_solaR PANELS EXAPMPLE USA-1-1.pdfssuser99a391
 
SEISMIC CODES OF PAKISTAN.pptx
SEISMIC CODES OF PAKISTAN.pptxSEISMIC CODES OF PAKISTAN.pptx
SEISMIC CODES OF PAKISTAN.pptxHafizaKhan11
 
Dynamic Analysis of Multistorey framed structure with roof tower
Dynamic Analysis of Multistorey framed structure with roof towerDynamic Analysis of Multistorey framed structure with roof tower
Dynamic Analysis of Multistorey framed structure with roof toweramitranjan145
 
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING Abhilash Chandra Dey
 
IS 1893 Part 1 - 2016-01-49.pdf
IS 1893 Part 1 - 2016-01-49.pdfIS 1893 Part 1 - 2016-01-49.pdf
IS 1893 Part 1 - 2016-01-49.pdfsandipanpaul16
 
IRJET- Parametric Study of Foundation of Tension and Suspension Tower wit...
IRJET-  	  Parametric Study of Foundation of Tension and Suspension Tower wit...IRJET-  	  Parametric Study of Foundation of Tension and Suspension Tower wit...
IRJET- Parametric Study of Foundation of Tension and Suspension Tower wit...IRJET Journal
 
design philosophy in structure design in civil engineering
design philosophy in structure design in civil engineeringdesign philosophy in structure design in civil engineering
design philosophy in structure design in civil engineeringNagma Modi
 
strip-foundation-design-calcualtion.docx
strip-foundation-design-calcualtion.docxstrip-foundation-design-calcualtion.docx
strip-foundation-design-calcualtion.docxVICTOR A. KIPLAGAT
 
CHAPTER 3 (part 1) Wind Load and procedure.pptx
CHAPTER 3 (part 1) Wind Load and procedure.pptxCHAPTER 3 (part 1) Wind Load and procedure.pptx
CHAPTER 3 (part 1) Wind Load and procedure.pptxMamushLeta
 

Similar to 875 4 (20)

4998 1
4998 14998 1
4998 1
 
Loads considered while designing a building according to Indian standars
Loads considered while designing a building according to Indian standarsLoads considered while designing a building according to Indian standars
Loads considered while designing a building according to Indian standars
 
875 1
875 1875 1
875 1
 
Chimney design &amp;engg code
Chimney design &amp;engg codeChimney design &amp;engg code
Chimney design &amp;engg code
 
WIND LOAD ON BUILDING AND STR.pdf
WIND LOAD ON BUILDING AND STR.pdfWIND LOAD ON BUILDING AND STR.pdf
WIND LOAD ON BUILDING AND STR.pdf
 
IS-1893-part1-2016-181029102047.pdf
IS-1893-part1-2016-181029102047.pdfIS-1893-part1-2016-181029102047.pdf
IS-1893-part1-2016-181029102047.pdf
 
1893-Part 1-2016.pdf
1893-Part 1-2016.pdf1893-Part 1-2016.pdf
1893-Part 1-2016.pdf
 
CSE_202_Chapter_4-1893-part-1-2016-1pdf.pdf
CSE_202_Chapter_4-1893-part-1-2016-1pdf.pdfCSE_202_Chapter_4-1893-part-1-2016-1pdf.pdf
CSE_202_Chapter_4-1893-part-1-2016-1pdf.pdf
 
IS 1893 2016-1pdf.pdf
IS 1893  2016-1pdf.pdfIS 1893  2016-1pdf.pdf
IS 1893 2016-1pdf.pdf
 
Mechanical Design and Analysis of Steel Stack by Varying its Height with Cons...
Mechanical Design and Analysis of Steel Stack by Varying its Height with Cons...Mechanical Design and Analysis of Steel Stack by Varying its Height with Cons...
Mechanical Design and Analysis of Steel Stack by Varying its Height with Cons...
 
determining_wind_and_snow_loads_for_solaR PANELS EXAPMPLE USA-1-1.pdf
determining_wind_and_snow_loads_for_solaR PANELS EXAPMPLE USA-1-1.pdfdetermining_wind_and_snow_loads_for_solaR PANELS EXAPMPLE USA-1-1.pdf
determining_wind_and_snow_loads_for_solaR PANELS EXAPMPLE USA-1-1.pdf
 
SEISMIC CODES OF PAKISTAN.pptx
SEISMIC CODES OF PAKISTAN.pptxSEISMIC CODES OF PAKISTAN.pptx
SEISMIC CODES OF PAKISTAN.pptx
 
Dynamic Analysis of Multistorey framed structure with roof tower
Dynamic Analysis of Multistorey framed structure with roof towerDynamic Analysis of Multistorey framed structure with roof tower
Dynamic Analysis of Multistorey framed structure with roof tower
 
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING
 
IS 1893 Part 1 - 2016-01-49.pdf
IS 1893 Part 1 - 2016-01-49.pdfIS 1893 Part 1 - 2016-01-49.pdf
IS 1893 Part 1 - 2016-01-49.pdf
 
IRJET- Parametric Study of Foundation of Tension and Suspension Tower wit...
IRJET-  	  Parametric Study of Foundation of Tension and Suspension Tower wit...IRJET-  	  Parametric Study of Foundation of Tension and Suspension Tower wit...
IRJET- Parametric Study of Foundation of Tension and Suspension Tower wit...
 
design philosophy in structure design in civil engineering
design philosophy in structure design in civil engineeringdesign philosophy in structure design in civil engineering
design philosophy in structure design in civil engineering
 
strip-foundation-design-calcualtion.docx
strip-foundation-design-calcualtion.docxstrip-foundation-design-calcualtion.docx
strip-foundation-design-calcualtion.docx
 
Design of manual solar tracking system wps
Design of manual solar tracking system wpsDesign of manual solar tracking system wps
Design of manual solar tracking system wps
 
CHAPTER 3 (part 1) Wind Load and procedure.pptx
CHAPTER 3 (part 1) Wind Load and procedure.pptxCHAPTER 3 (part 1) Wind Load and procedure.pptx
CHAPTER 3 (part 1) Wind Load and procedure.pptx
 

More from Mohd Danish

APPLICATION OF GENE EXPRESSION PROGRAMMING IN FLOOD FREQUENCY ANALYSIS
APPLICATION OF GENE EXPRESSION PROGRAMMING IN FLOOD FREQUENCY ANALYSISAPPLICATION OF GENE EXPRESSION PROGRAMMING IN FLOOD FREQUENCY ANALYSIS
APPLICATION OF GENE EXPRESSION PROGRAMMING IN FLOOD FREQUENCY ANALYSISMohd Danish
 
Prediction of scour depth at bridge abutments in cohesive bed using gene expr...
Prediction of scour depth at bridge abutments in cohesive bed using gene expr...Prediction of scour depth at bridge abutments in cohesive bed using gene expr...
Prediction of scour depth at bridge abutments in cohesive bed using gene expr...Mohd Danish
 
Scour prediction at bridge piers in cohesive bed using gene expression progra...
Scour prediction at bridge piers in cohesive bed using gene expression progra...Scour prediction at bridge piers in cohesive bed using gene expression progra...
Scour prediction at bridge piers in cohesive bed using gene expression progra...Mohd Danish
 
Seismic Conceptual Design of Buildings
Seismic Conceptual Design of BuildingsSeismic Conceptual Design of Buildings
Seismic Conceptual Design of BuildingsMohd Danish
 
Earth+and+rock+fill+dams
Earth+and+rock+fill+damsEarth+and+rock+fill+dams
Earth+and+rock+fill+damsMohd Danish
 

More from Mohd Danish (13)

IS 1893:1984
IS 1893:1984IS 1893:1984
IS 1893:1984
 
APPLICATION OF GENE EXPRESSION PROGRAMMING IN FLOOD FREQUENCY ANALYSIS
APPLICATION OF GENE EXPRESSION PROGRAMMING IN FLOOD FREQUENCY ANALYSISAPPLICATION OF GENE EXPRESSION PROGRAMMING IN FLOOD FREQUENCY ANALYSIS
APPLICATION OF GENE EXPRESSION PROGRAMMING IN FLOOD FREQUENCY ANALYSIS
 
Prediction of scour depth at bridge abutments in cohesive bed using gene expr...
Prediction of scour depth at bridge abutments in cohesive bed using gene expr...Prediction of scour depth at bridge abutments in cohesive bed using gene expr...
Prediction of scour depth at bridge abutments in cohesive bed using gene expr...
 
Scour prediction at bridge piers in cohesive bed using gene expression progra...
Scour prediction at bridge piers in cohesive bed using gene expression progra...Scour prediction at bridge piers in cohesive bed using gene expression progra...
Scour prediction at bridge piers in cohesive bed using gene expression progra...
 
Sp22
Sp22Sp22
Sp22
 
Seismic Conceptual Design of Buildings
Seismic Conceptual Design of BuildingsSeismic Conceptual Design of Buildings
Seismic Conceptual Design of Buildings
 
Fema 254
Fema 254Fema 254
Fema 254
 
Fema 253
Fema 253Fema 253
Fema 253
 
Fema 266
Fema 266Fema 266
Fema 266
 
Plates
PlatesPlates
Plates
 
Earth+and+rock+fill+dams
Earth+and+rock+fill+damsEarth+and+rock+fill+dams
Earth+and+rock+fill+dams
 
13920
1392013920
13920
 
13828
1382813828
13828
 

Recently uploaded

Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Sapana Sha
 
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxContemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxRoyAbrique
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphThiyagu K
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityGeoBlogs
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactdawncurless
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingTechSoup
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxpboyjonauth
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfciinovamais
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationnomboosow
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdfssuser54595a
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13Steve Thomason
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104misteraugie
 
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxCARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxGaneshChakor2
 
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991RKavithamani
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeThiyagu K
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
 
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxContemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
 
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxCARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
 
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 

875 4

  • 1. IS : 875 ( Part 4 ) - 1987 ( Reaffirmed 1997 ) Indian Standard CODE OF PRACTICE,FOR DESIGN LOADS ( OTHER THAN EARTHQUAKE ) FOR BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES PART 4 SNOW LOADS (Second Revision). Fourtll Rcprjnt OCTOBER 1997 UDC 624.042-42 : 006.7 @ Copyright 1988 B U R E A U O F I N D I A N S T A N D A R D S MANAK BHAVAN, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG NEW DELHI 110002 Gr 4 October 1988
  • 2. fndian Standard CODEOFPRACTICE IS:875(Bart4)-1987 FOR DESIGNLOADS(OTHERTHANEARTHQUAKE) FORBUILDINGSAND STRUCTURES r.PART 4 SNOW LOADS (Second Revision) 0. F O R E W O R D 0.1 This Indian Standard ( Part4 ) ( Second Revision ) was adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standards on 9 November 1987, after the draft finalized by the Structural Safety Sectional Committee had been approved by the Civil Engineering Division Council. 0.2 A building has to perform many functions satisfactorily. Amongst these functions are the utility of the building for the intended use and occupancy. structural safety, fire safety; and compliance with hygienic, sanitation, ventilation and daylight standards. The design of the build- ing is dependent upon the minimum requirements prescribed for each of the above functions. The minimum requirements pertaining to the structural safety of buildings are being covered in this Code by way of laying down minimum design loads which have to be assumed for dead loads, imposed loads, wind loads, snow loads and other external loads, the structure would be required to bear. Strict conformity to loading standards recommended in this Code, it is hoped, will not only ensure the structural safety of the buildings which are being designed and constructed in the country and thereby reduce the hazards to life and property caused by unsafe structures, but also eliminate the wastage caused by assuming unnecessarily heavy loadings. Notwithstanding what is stated regarding the structural safety of buildings, the application of the provisions should be carried out by compe- tent and responsible structural designer who would satisfy himself that the structure designed in accordance with this code meets the desired performance requirements when the same is carried out according to specifications. 0.3 This Code was first published in 1957 for the guidance of civil engineers, designers and archi- tects associated with the planning and design of buildings. It included the provisions for the basic design loads ( dead loads, live loads, wind loads and seismic loads ) to be assumed in the design of buildings. In its first revision in 1964, the wind pressure provisions were modified on the basis of studies of wind phenomenon and its effects on structures undertaken by the special committee in consultation with the Indian Meteo- rological Department. In addition to this, new clauses on wind loads for butterfly type structures were included; wind pressure coefficients for sheeted roofs, both curved and sloping, were modified; seismic load provisions were deleted ( separate code having been prepared ) and metric system of weights and measurements was adopted. 0.3.1 With the increased adoption of the Code, a number of comments were received on the pro- visions on live load values adopted for different occupancies. Simultaneously live loads surveys have been carried out in America, Canada and other countries to arrive at realistic live loads based on actual determination of loading( mov- able and immovable ) in different occupancies. Keeping this in view and other developments in the field of wind engineering, the Sectional Com- mittee responsible for the preparation of this standard has decided to prepare the second revision in the following five parts: Part 1 Dead Loads Part 2 Imposed Loads Part 3 Wind Loads Part 4 Snow Loads Part 5 Special Loads and Load Combinations Earthquake load is covered in IS : 1893-1984* which should be considered along with the above loads. 0.3.2 This part ( Part 4 ) deals with snow loads on roofs of buildings. The committee responsible for the prepara- tion of the code while reviewing the available snow-fall data, felt the paucity of data on which to make specific recommendations on the depth of ground snow load for different regions effected by snow-fall, In due course the characteristic *Criteria for earthquake resistant designing of strue- trues (fourth revision ). 1
  • 3. IS:875(Part4)-1987 snow load on ground for different regions will ‘Basis for design of structures - Determination be included based on studies. of snow loads on roofs’, issued by the Interna- 0.4 This part is based on IS0 4355-198 1 ( E ) tional Organization for Standardization. 1. SCOPE 1.1 This standard (Part 4) deals with snow loads on roofs of buildings. Roofs should be designed for the actual load due to snow or for the &posed loads specified in Part 2 Imposed loads, whichever is more severe. NOTB - Mountainous regions in northern parts of India are subjected to snow-fall. In India, parts of Jammu and Kashmir ( Baramulah District, Srinagar District, Anantnag District and Ladakh District ); Punjab, Himachal Pradesh ( Chamba, Kulu, Kinnaur District, Mahasu District, Mandi District, Sirmur District and Simla District); and Uttar Pradesh ( Dehra Dun District, Tehri Garhwal District, Almora District and Nainital District ) experi- ence snow-fall of varying depths two to three times in a year. 2. NOTATIONS 3. 3.1 p ( Dimensionless) - Nominal values of the shape coefficients, tak- ing into account snow drifts, sliding snow, etc, with subscripts, if necessary. Ij ( in metres ) - Horizontal dimensions with numerical sub- scripts, if necessary. hj ( in metres ) - Vertical dimensions with numerical sub- . scripts, if necessary. fii (in degrees) - Roof slope. so (in pascals ) - Snow load on ground. SI ( in pascals ) - Snow load on roofs. SNOW LOAD IN ROOF (S) The minimum design snow load on a roof area or any other area above ground which is subjected to snow accumulation is obtained by multiplying the snow load on ground, s, by the shape coefficient CL, as applicable to the particular roof area considered. S=c(S0 where s = design snow load in Pa on plan area of roof, p = shape coefficient ( see 4), and so = ground snow load in Pa ( 1 Pa = lN/ma ). NOTE - Ground snow load at any place depends on the critical combinati.m of the maximum depth of un- disturbed aggregate cumulative snow-fall and its average density. In due course the characteristic snow load on ground for different regions will be included based on studies. Till such time the users of this standard are advised to contanct either Snow and Avalanches Study Establishment ( Defence Research and Development Organization ) Manali ( HP) or Indian Meteorological Department ( IMD ), Pune in the absence of any specific information for any location. 4. SHAPE COEFFICIENTS 4.1 General Principles In perfectly calm weather, falling snow would cover roofs and the ground with a uniform blanket of snow and the design snow load could be consi- derd as .a uniformly distributed load. Truly uni- form loading conditions, however, are rare and have usually only been observed in areas that are sheltered on all sides by high trees, buildings, etc. In such a case, the shape coefficient would be equal to untiy. In most regions, snow falls are accompanied or followed by winds. The winds will redistribute the snow and on some roofs, especially multi- level roofs, the accumulated drift load may reach a multiple of the ground load. Roofs which are sheltered by other buildings, vegetation, etc, may collect more snow load than the ground level. The phenomenon is of the same nature as that illustrated for multilevel roofs in 4.2.4. So far sufficient data are not available to deter- mine the shape coefficient in a statistical basis. Therefore, a nominal value is given. A representa- tive sample of rcof is shown in 4.2. However, in special cases such as strip loading, cleaning of the roof periodically by deliberate heating of the roof, etc, have to be treated separately. The distribution of snow in the direction parallel to the eaves is assumed to be uniform. 2
  • 4. 4.2 Shape Coefficients for Selected Types of Roofs 4.2.1 Simple Flat and Monopitch Roofs Simple Pitched Roofs (Positive Roof Slope)* p, = 0.8 4.2.2 Simple or Multiple Pitched Roofs (Negative Roof Slope) Two-Span or Multispan Roofs o*<p<3l E3&#<6 49>60* t+.= p, =O.% t'2~=0.8+04(~) jL, =0*8 Pl** pp1-6 m-0 l For.asymmetrical simple Pitched roofs, each side of the roof shall be treated as me half of corresponding symmetwal roofs. 3
  • 5. Is:875(Partl)-1987 4.2.3 Simple Curved Roofs The following cases 1 and 2 must be examined: CASE 2 Restriction: h<F3 a-OifB>60’ 4
  • 6. Is:875(Part4)-1987 4.2.4 Multilevel Roofs* 91 = 0’8 Bs = Ps + Pa where A - due to sliding pw - due to wind 1, = 2ht but is restricted as follows: SmCls<lSm 11 + f, < kh PW=T - SO with the restriction 0.8 < pw ( 4’0 where h is in metres so is in kilopascals ( kilonewtons per square metre ) k =2kN/m8 p > 19” : ps is determined from an additional load amounting to SO percent of the maximum total load on the adjacent slope of the upper roofs, and is distributed linearly as shown on the figure. B < 15” : ps = 0 *A more extensive formula for pw is described in Appendix A. tlf1~ < I,. the coe5cient p is determined by interpolation between JJ, and ps. SThe load on the upper roof is calculated according to 4.2.1 or 4.2.2. 5
  • 7. 4.25 Complex Multilevel Roofs c 1, - 2h1: h - 2h,: p1 - 0’8 Restriction: Sm< I,< Urn; Sm<b<lSm; 11 and BW ( ccl + @W ), are calculated according to 4.2.1,4.2.2 and 4.2.4. 6
  • 8. I.S:875(Part4)-1987 4.2.6 Roofs with Local Projections and Obstructions where /I is in metres sO is in kilopascals (kilonewtons per square metre) k I= 2 kN/ma /I1 = 0.8 1=2/l Kestrictions: 0’8 < /Ia < 2-O Sm41615m 4.3 Shape Coefficients in Areas Exposed to Wind The shape coefficients given in 4.2 and Appen- dix A may be reduced by 25 percent provided the designer has demonstrated that the following con- ditions are fulfilled: 4 b) The building is located in an exposed location such as open level terrain with only scattered buildings, trees or other obstructions so that the roof is exposed to the winds on all sides and is ndt likely to become shielded in the future by obstructions higher than the roof within a distance from the building equal to ten times the height of the obstruction above the roof level; The roof does not have any significant projections such as parapet walls which may prevent snow from being blown off the roof. NOTE - In some areas, winter climate may not be of such a nature as to produce a significant reduction of roof loads from the snow load on the ground. These areas are: a) Winter calm valleys in the mountains where some- times layer after layer of snow accumulates on roofs without any appreciable wind; and removal of snow by b) Areas (that is, high temperature) where the maxi- mum snow load may be the result of single snow- storm, removal. occasionally without appreciable wind In such areas, the determination of the shape coeffi- cients shall be based on local experience with due regard to the likelihood of wind drifting and sliding. 5. ICE LOAD ON WIRES 5.1 Ice loads are required to be taken into account in the design of overhead electrical-transmission and communication lines, over-head contact lines for electric traction, aerial masts and similar structures in zones subjected to ice formation. The thickness of ice deposit alround may be taken to be between 3 and 10 mm depending upon the location of the structure. The mass density of ice may be assumed to be equal to O-9 g/cm”. While considering the wind force on wires and cables, the increase in diameter due to ice forma- tion shall be taken into consideration. 7
  • 9. IS:875(Part4)-1987 A P P E N D I X A ( Clauses 42.4 and 4.3 ) SHAPE COEFFICIENTS FOR MULTILEVEL ROOFS A more comprehensive formula for the shape coefficient for multilevel roofs than that given in 4.2.4 is as follows: -- WIN0OIRECTIONS c Pr -1+ + ( ml iI + mI 1, )( 1, - 2 h ) Cl = 0’8 i,=hh fh and I being in metres) Restriction : where so is in kilopascals (kilonewtons per square metre) k is in newtons per cubic metre I,< ISm Values of m, ( mr ) for the higher ( lower ) roof depend on its profile and are taken as equal to: 0.5 for plane roofs with slopes @ < 20’ and vaulted roofs with f< +- 0’3 for plane roofs with slopes p > 20” and vaulted roofs with f>$ The coefficients m, and ma may be adjusted to take into account conditions for transfer of snow on the roof surface ( that is, wind, temperature, etc. ). NOTE - The other condition of loading also shall be tried.
  • 10. Bureau of Indian Standards BIS is a statutory institution established under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 to promote harmonious development of the activities of standardization, marking and quality certification of goods and attending to connected matters in the country. Copyright BIS has the copyright of all its publications. No part of these publications may be reproduced in any form without the prior permission in writing of BIS. This does not preclude the free use, in the course of implementing the standard, of necessary detaik, such as symbols and sizes, type or grade designations. Enquiries relating to copyright be addressed to the Director (Publication), BIS. Review of Indian Standards Amendments are issued to standards as the need arises on the basis of comments. Standards are also reviewed periodically; a standard along with amendments is reaffirmed when such review indicates that no changes are needed; if the review indicates that changes are needed, it is taken up for revision. Users of Indian Standards should ascertain that they are in possession of the latest amendments or edition by referring to the latest issue of ‘BIS Handbook’ and ‘Standards Monthly Additions’. Amendments Issued Since Publication Amend No. Date of Issue Text Affected BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS Headquarters: Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110002 Telephones: 323 0131,323 33 75,323 94 02 Regional Offices: Telegrams: Manaksanstha (Common to all offices) Telephone Central : Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg NEW DELHI 110002 Eastern : Northern : l/14 C.I.T. Scheme VII M, V.I.P. Road, Maniktola CALCUTTA 700054 SCO.335336, Sector 34-A CHANDIGARH 160022 Southern : C.I.T. Campus, IV Cross Road, CHENNAI 600113 Western : Branches : Manakalaya, E9 MIDC, Marol, Andheri (East) MUMBAI 400093 AHMADABAD. BANGALORE. BHOPAL. BHUBANESHWAR. COIMBATORE. FARIDABAD. GHAZIABAD. GUWAHATI. HYDERABAD. JAlPUR. KANPUR. LUCKNOW. NAGPUR. PATNA. PUNE. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 323 76 17,323 38 41 337 84 99,337 85 61 337 86 26,337 9120 1 60 38 43 60 20 25 1 235 02 16,235 04 42 235 15 19,235 23 15 { 832 92 95,832 78 58 832 78 91,832 78 92 Printed by Reprography Unit, BIS, New Delhi