This is a presentation delivered at the 16th Annual Conference on the Science of Botanicals and 5th Annual Interim American Society of Pharmacognosy Meeting from April 11-14, 2016 in Oxford, MS, USA.
Abstract:
Answering the Call to Arms: Tools for Assessing the Anti-infective Potential of Natural Products in a Time of Rising Antibiotic Resistance
Quave CL1,2
1 Center for the Study of Human Health, Emory University, 550 Asbury Circle, Candler Library 107, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA. 2 Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, 615 Michael Street, Whitehead 105L, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA.
As antibiotic resistance continues to rise, the pool of viable anti-infective therapeutic options is becoming rapidly exhausted. New therapies are in high demand and natural products are a likely source of novel bioactive compounds to meet this need. In particular, botanical secondary metabolites represent a rich pool for antibiotic discovery efforts. Plants are often the primary ingredients used in traditional anti-infective therapies, and yet their activity and mechanisms of action are often poorly understood. Much of the antibacterial research on botanical extracts and essential oils has focused on growth inhibitory studies using outdated methods limited in their ability to obtain an accurate assessment of bioactivity. The emergence of new molecular and bioanalytical tools for drug discovery provides a unique opportunity for application to natural products research.
Using Staphylococcus aureus as a model, tools for anti-infective testing of plant extracts will be reviewed, specifically focusing on the merits and limitations of each method. Examples include standardized methods for examining activity for the inhibition of growth (e.g., MIC, MBC), virulence (e.g., quorum sensing and toxin quantification) and pathogenesis (e.g., biofilms and antibiotic synergy). Data from our recent discoveries of novel biofilm [1] and quorum sensing [2,3] inhibitors isolated from medicinal plants (Rubus ulmifolius, Castanea sativa and Schinus terebinthifolius) will be presented in the review of these tools.
Acknowledgements: This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01 AT007052). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the official views of NCCIH or NIH.
References: [1] Quave CL, Estévez-Carmona M, et al. (2012) PLoS ONE, 7(1): e28737. [2] Quave CL, Lyles JT, et al. (2015) PLoS ONE, 10(8): e0136486. [3] Quave CL, Horswill AR (2014) Frontiers in Microbiology, 5: 706.
Role of pharmacists in combating drug resistatnce by neel ratnam.neel ratnam
Similar to Answering the Call to Arms: Tools for assessing the anti-infective potential of natural products in a time of rising antibiotic resistance (20)
Call Girls Ludhiana Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Answering the Call to Arms: Tools for assessing the anti-infective potential of natural products in a time of rising antibiotic resistance
1. Answering the Call to Arms:
Tools for Assessing the Anti-infective
Potential of Natural Products in a Time
of Rising Antibiotic Resistance
Cassandra L. Quave, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Dermatology & Human Health
Curator, Emory University Herbarium
E-mail: cquave@emory.edu
Lab Website: http://etnobotanica.us/
Twitter: @QuaveEthnobot
2. Introduction
Plants as a source of medicine
Willow
Aspirin
Foxglove
Digoxin/Digitoxin
Mayapple
Podophyllin/ Etoposide
Poppy
Codeine/ Morphine
Plant natural products are notably absent
among approved antibiotics.
3. Natural products in the Nobel Prize spotlight
Dr. Youyou Tu
Ming dynasty version
(1574 CE) of the
handbook. “A handful of
qinghao immersed with
2 liters of water, wring
out the juice and drink it
all” is printed in the fifth
line from the right.
artemisinin
Artemisia annua L., Asteraceae
Tu, Y. 2011. The discovery of artemisinin
(qinghaosu) and gifts from Chinese medicine
Nature Medicine 17: 1217–1220
4. Common criticisms for natural
products as anti-infectives
• Chemically complex extracts
• Synergistic interactions
• Lack of mechanistic studies
• Breaks Lipinski’s rules for small molecules
• New patent ruling (Myriad) & interpretation on
natural products
• Lack of scientific rigor and reproducibility in
assessment of biological activity
5. On the precipice of the post-antibiotic era
• 2M serious
infections, 23k
fatalities linked to
MDR infection in
USA
http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/
6. Looking to the future: A perfect storm
• Big pharma has
shown lack of
interest/investment
in antimicrobial
development
▫ High risk, low return
▫ More lucrative drug
options
▫ “low hanging fruit”
already captured
▫ Inevitable resistance
▫ Limited lifespan of
drug
Cooper & Shlaes. 2011. Nature 472:32
7. What happens when we have nothing
left in the arsenal?
• Implications for entire
healthcare infrastructure
and for military as well:
▫ Would cripple fields of surgery,
dentistry, oncology, pediatrics, etc.
▫ Mexican War (1845-1848) and the
Spanish-American War (1898):
number of disease-related deaths
outnumbered battlefield related
deaths by seven to one
Murray et al. 2008. J Trauma Injury, Infection, and Critical Care 64: S221-S231
8. Who can fill the antibiotics void?
▫ Academic scientists?
▫ Small biotech?
▫ A unique opportunity for phytochemists,
pharmacognosists and ethnobotanists?
9. Ethnobotany as a tool for discovery
• >450,000 plant species on
Earth*
• Targeted approach necessary
*Pimm & Joppa 2015 Annals of the Missouri Botanical
Garden. 100: 170-176
10. Biological Assessment of Natural Products:
Are We Asking the Right Questions?
• Classic antibiotic discovery has focused on
bacteriostatic and bactericidal action
• What about other MOAs?
▫ Targeting resistance
Anti-biofilm therapies
Antibiotic adjuvants
▫ Bacterial disarmament (anti-virulence approach)
▫ Host-directed therapies
11. Every model has strengths & weaknesses
• The bioassay matters
▫ Disc/well diffusion are NOT
suitable:
for establishing MICs; or
for comparing bioactivity
between extracts or between
extracts & antibiotics
▫ Use Clinical & Laboratory
Standards Institute
methods for MIC & MBC
▫ Mechanistic driven assays
(reporters, biofilms, etc.)
88
515
Diffusion
Assay
Other Assay
PubMed search of 2015 literature
revealed that 17% of in vitro studies on
antibacterial activity of plant extracts
used outdated diffusion techniques.
12. Every model has strengths & weaknesses
• To establish MIC50 or
MIC90, a plate reader is
necessary ($$$), or:
▫ MIC can be established by
eye, and further MBC by
colony plate count ($)
• Biofilm can be assessed by
CSLM ($$$), or:
▫ MBIC & MBEC can be
assessed by crystal violet
stain assay ($)
Concentration (µg/mL)
13. Clinical relevance
• The dose matters
▫ Crudes with >512 µg/mL activity not relevant to clinic
• The species & strain matters
▫ Focus on greatest area of clinical need – MDR pathogens
(ESKAPE and Gram-negative bacteria)
▫ Use MDR clinical isolates
• Relevant controls matter
▫ Mutant strains for desired phenotype are key
• Planktonic growth does not fully represent the clinical
reality (most infections are in biofilm in host)
• Resources exist:
14. Acquired vs. intrinsic resistance
• 17M new biofilm
infections/year in US =
550k fatalities
• Uni- or Poly-microbial
• Heightened gene exchange
• Slow growth/metabolism
• Matrix presents a physical
barrier to host immune
response and antibiotic
therapy
15. Models for Biofilm
Formation & Dispersal
microtiter plate
catheters in vivo
(Imaging with IVIS)
flow cells
catheters in vitro
16. Elmleaf Blackberry
• Traditional uses in S. Italy:
▫ Leaves: furuncles, abscesses, and
other skin inflammations
▫ Roots: hair loss
▫ Fruits: food use
Rubus ulmifolius Schott., Rosaceae: The
source of the bioactive composition
“220D-F2”.
Quave et al., J Ethnobiol and Ethnomed 2009. 4(5)
Quave et al., J Ethnopharmacol 2008. 118:418-428
17. 220D-F2 is effective against all clonal lineages of S. aureus,
regardless of antibiotic resistance profile and is nontoxic to
mammalian cell lines.
Quave et al., PLoS One 2012: 7(1)
18. Biofilm Inhibitor: 220D-F2
220D-F2 improves response to functionally distinct classes of antibiotics,
including daptomycin, clindamycin, vancomycin, and oxacillin.
Quave et al., PLoS One 2012: 7(1)
21. Quorum Quenching Approach
• Quorum quenching
▫ “Disarming” bacteria
▫ Protect the host
▫ Adjuvant to existing lines
of antibiotics
• Accessory gene regulator
(agr) system
▫ controls virulence
Be Toxic!
Be Toxic!
Be Toxic!
Be Toxic!
Quave & Horswill. (2014) Flipping the switch. Frontiers in Microbiology. 5(706):1-10
22. Quorum Quenching Approach
• Quorum quenching
▫ “Disarming” bacteria
▫ Protect the host
▫ Adjuvant to existing lines
of antibiotics
▫ Anti-virulence strategy
• Accessory gene regulator
(agr) system
▫ controls virulence
X
X
X
X X
Not
Bactericidal
Quave & Horswill. (2014) Flipping the switch. Frontiers in Microbiology. 5(706):1-10
X
23. 224C-F2 inhibits agr in a nonbiocide manner
X X
Not
Bactericidal
Quorum
Quenching
Growth (OD)
agr
(Fluorescence)
Quave et al. 2015
PLoS One 10(8)
25. • Early-stage toxicity tests as a counter-screen to
antimicrobial assays are critical!
?
“First, do no harm” - Hippocrates
26. “First, do no harm” - Hippocrates
• Early-stage toxicity tests as a counter-screen to
antimicrobial assays are critical!
Galleria mellonella is useful for toxicity and antibacterial
efficacy tests BEFORE moving to vertebrate models
27. 224C-F2 has limited impact on growth of common skin microflora.
Quave CL, Lyles JT, Kavanaugh JS, Nelson K, Parlet CP, et al. (2015) Castanea sativa (European Chestnut) Leaf Extracts Rich in
Ursene and Oleanene Derivatives Block Staphylococcus aureus Virulence and Pathogenesis without Detectable Resistance. PLoS
ONE 10(8): e0136486. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136486
http://127.0.0.1:8081/plosone/article?id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0136486
Potential for off-target effects
28. What is the functional relevance of
the human microbiome?
• Basic principles :
• Microbes and host have co-evolved
and have a complex relationship
influenced by our environment
• Dysbiosis as a result of anti-infective
therapy can lead to disease states
• Disease may be expressed as a
consequence of signals sent in both
directions (host-bacteria)
• Take-home message: counter
screens for off-target effects on
commensal bacteria are critical!
28
29. Predictions on resistance…
• Alexander Fleming’s 1945 Nobel speech:
▫ “The time may come when penicillin can be bought by
anyone in the shops. Then there is the danger that the
ignorant man may easily underdose himself and by
exposing his microbes to non-lethal quantities of the
drug make them resistant.”
▫ Is this also true for antimicrobial plant
extracts??
YES!!
30. Subtherapeutic use of natural products can
also lead to resistance: Tea Tree Oil example
• Sublethal treatment with TTO =
≥2-fold increase in MIC to
antibiotics
• Repeated exposure to sublethal
concentrations of TTO to MRSA
and MSSA = 4-fold increase in
MIC for TTO
• Repeated use of commercial
products with TTO may lead to
development of skin flora with
TTO resistance
McMahon et al. 2008. Lett Appl Microbiol 47(4): 263-8
31. Conclusions
• Natural products can play an important role in future
anti-infective/antibiotic discovery pipeline
• Scientific rigor in biological assessment of extracts is
critical
▫ Recognize strengths/limitations of models
▫ Use clinically relevant strains
▫ Use standard methods for core testing
▫ Consider off-target effects early in discovery process
• Consider alternate MOAs (host-directed, anti-virulence,
anti-pathogenesis, antibiotic potentiation, etc.)
• Balance (symbiosis vs. dysbiosis) is key to human health
and should be considered early in discovery process
32. Acknowledgements
Quave Lab:
James T. Lyles, PhD
Kate Nelson
Rina Lee
Tracy Li
Justin Robeny
Adam Mackie
Matt Mendelsohn
Xinyi Huang
Past lab members:
Emily Mapelli
Nami Mottoghi
Amelia Muhs
Alex Pijeaux
Paula Tyler
Eugenia Addie-Noye
Matt Dorian
Parth Jarivala
Philanthropic DonorsR01 AT007052
34. Questions? Traditional Medicine
for infectious disease
Herbarium
voucher
Plant DNA
Botanical
Extracts
Microbiome
Biofilm formation
Planktonic growth
Quorum sensing
In vivo toxicity & efficacy
ValidationofTM
Cytotoxicity
Combo formulation testing
ProductInnovation
Platform
Antibiotic
potentiation
E-mail: cquave@emory.edu Website: http://etnobotanica.us/
Twitter: @QuaveEthnobot
Editor's Notes
Approx. 80% of the global population relies on TM for primary healthcare, and much of this is based on botanicals.
Approx. 25% of our Western pharmaceuticals originated as natural products
Recent Nobel prize in medicine for 2 natural products for treatment of parasitic disease. – Artmisinin from artemesia annua – for malaria; avermectin (soil microbe)
2000 year old herbal text
Antibiotic pipeline nearly empty
Last line therapies for Shigella and Neisseria gonorrhoeae
CDC Urgent threat level:
CRE, Clostridium dificile, N. gonorrhoeae
CDC Serious threat level:
Acinetobacter, VRE, MRSA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumonia, TB
High economic burden for infectious disease (HAI’s in US = $28.4-45 B)
Staphylococcus aureus as a pathogen. Staphylococcus aureus is an abundant, opportunistic pathogen that is the causative agent of numerous infections. This bacterium colonizes the nasal passages of approximately 30% of the healthy adult population, which translates to 79 million colonized people in the US alone[26]. S. aureus infections initiate through trauma to the skin or mucosal layer and then progress through an invasive or toxin-mediated process. Of the various infections, S. aureus is a leading cause of bacteremia[27], sepsis[28], brain abscesses[29], medical device infections[30], and skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI)[31], and is the most common cause of surgical site infections[32], bone and joint infections[33], pneumonia[34], and endocarditis[35]. The prevalence of these infections has increased due to higher rates of colonization, immunosuppressive conditions, greater use of surgical implants, and dramatic increases in antibiotic resistance.
The epidemic waves of antimicrobial resistance in S. aureus are well documented and particularly alarming [see comprehensive review[36]]. The first methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections were reported in 1961[37], and since these first reports, the levels of MRSA have been rising, reaching over 70% in some healthcare settings[36]. The emergence and spread of virulent MRSA strains is taxing our healthcare system. Compared to antibiotic-susceptible strains, MRSA infections exhibit elevated mortality rates, require longer hospital stays, and exert a higher financial burden[38]. Among invasive pathogens, recent studies indicate that MRSA are the most common cause of invasive disease[7], more abundant than pneumococci, Group A streptococci, and Haemophilus influenzae combined, leading to more fatalities in the U.S. than AIDS[7; 39]. All of these findings underscore the severity of the growing MRSA burden on healthcare.
In the late 1990’s, MRSA strains expanded from healthcare settings and began infecting otherwise healthy individuals in the community. These strains are divergent from healthcare-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) in antibiotic susceptibility, Panton-Valentine leukocidin carriage patterns, and immune evasion properties[40]. These strains were coined “community-associated” MRSA (CA-MRSA) for their new properties and have become the most recent epidemic wave of resistance in S. aureus[36; 41]. Outbreaks of CA-MRSA have spread worldwide with remarkable speed and have affected otherwise healthy individuals[42; 43]. Given our knowledge of how quickly drug-resistance spreads in S. aureus, it is apparent that we are rapidly exhausting current treatment options. Although the global spread of CA-MRSA has been startling, perhaps even more alarming is the hypervirulence of these strains. Severe tissue-destructive infections and fulminant, necrotizing pneumonia are common features of CA-MRSA, rarely seen before this epidemic wave.
Impact of 220D-F2 as assessed by CLSM Microtiter plate biofilm assays were undertaken with UAMS-1 (top) or UAMS-1782 (bottom) after the addition of either 220D-F2 at the indicated concentrations or excipient (DMSO) to the growth medium. Confocal images were obtained after 20 hours of incubation. The overall biofilm architecture is visible at a magnification of 10X. Isogenic sarA mutants grown in BM with DMSO were included as negative controls. A clear dose-dependent response in biofilm attenuation is evident (Quave et al. 2012).
Skin wash for inflammation make a tea and wash body
no reported antibacterial activity
Nuts used as a food
Decreasing florescence due to a reduction in the expression of a YFP tag associated with the alleles that express exotoxins.
Growth arrow
Figure 3: 224 extracts inhibit all four S. aureus agr alleles a non-biocide manner. S. aureus agr reporter strains were treated with extracts 224, 224C, and 224C-F2 at a dose range of 0.05-100 μg mL-1. Bioactivity guided sequential fractionation resulted in increased quenching of all 4 agr alleles in a manner independent of growth inhibition. Optical density of the culture is represented by solid black symbols; fluorescence in the agr reporters is indicated by the open symbols. The IC50 and IC90 for quorum quenching impact of each extract are reported in Table 3. A. agr I, AH1677 B. agr II, AH430 C. agr III, AH1747 D. agr IV, AH1872.
Human microbiota primarily contains bacteria, eukaryotes and viruses
The human skin microbiota is established immediately after birth (delivery mode influences the makeup of the microbiome) and changes as we age