2. WHAT IS DESIGNING FORWHAT IS DESIGNING FOR
CONSTRUCTION SAFETY?CONSTRUCTION SAFETY?
The process of addressingThe process of addressing
construction site safety andconstruction site safety and
health, and planning forhealth, and planning for
future maintenance in thefuture maintenance in the
design phase of a project.design phase of a project.
3. WHY IS IT NECESSARY?WHY IS IT NECESSARY?
Currently there are no requirements forCurrently there are no requirements for
construction safety in building codesconstruction safety in building codes
IBC Chapter 33 Safeguards DuringIBC Chapter 33 Safeguards During
Construction-Pedestrian SafetyConstruction-Pedestrian Safety
5. DfCS ProcessDfCS Process11
-It’s a Team Concept-It’s a Team Concept
Design
Kickoff Design
Internal
Review
Issue for
Construction
External
Review
Trade contractor
involvement
• Establish design for
safety expectations
• Include construction and
operation perspective
• Identify design for safety
process and tools
• QA/QC
• Cross-
discipline
review
• Focused safety
review
• Owner review
1
Gambatese
6. U.S. Construction Accident StatisticsU.S. Construction Accident Statistics11
Nearly 200,000 serious injuries and 1,226Nearly 200,000 serious injuries and 1,226
deaths each yeardeaths each year
5.5% of workforce but 21.5% of fatalities5.5% of workforce but 21.5% of fatalities
Construction has one of the highest fatalityConstruction has one of the highest fatality
rates of any industry sectorrates of any industry sector
11
Bureau of Labor Statistics-2006Bureau of Labor Statistics-2006
7. CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENTS INCONSTRUCTION ACCIDENTS IN
U.S.U.S.11
11
Photos courtesy of Washington Group InternationalPhotos courtesy of Washington Group International
8. CONSTRUCTION FATALITIES BYCONSTRUCTION FATALITIES BY
OCCUPATIONOCCUPATION11
Total fatalities 1,226Total fatalities 1,226
Construction laborers 360Construction laborers 360
Electricians 117Electricians 117
Carpenters 114Carpenters 114
First Line supervisors 113First Line supervisors 113
Roofers 82Roofers 82
Painters and paper hangers 54Painters and paper hangers 54
Structural steel 36Structural steel 36
11
BLS,2006BLS,2006
10. Considering Safety During DesignConsidering Safety During Design
Offers the Most PayoffOffers the Most Payoff11
Conceptual Design
Detailed Engineering
Procurement
Construction
Start-up
High
Low
Ability to
Influence
Safety
Project Schedule
1
Szymberski 1987
11. DESIGN CAN INFLUENCEDESIGN CAN INFLUENCE
CONSTRUCTION SAFETY1CONSTRUCTION SAFETY11,21,2
22% of 226 injuries that occurred from 2000-2002 in Oregon,22% of 226 injuries that occurred from 2000-2002 in Oregon,
WA and CA linked to designWA and CA linked to design
42% of 224 fatalities in US between 1990-2003 linked to42% of 224 fatalities in US between 1990-2003 linked to
designdesign
In Europe, a 1991 study concluded that 60% of fatal accidentsIn Europe, a 1991 study concluded that 60% of fatal accidents
resulted from decisions made before site work beganresulted from decisions made before site work began
11
Behm, “Linking Construction Fatalities to the Design for Construction Safety Concept”, 2005Behm, “Linking Construction Fatalities to the Design for Construction Safety Concept”, 2005
22
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working ConditionsEuropean Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions
12. What Types of Design Decisions?What Types of Design Decisions?
IBC paragraph 704.11.1IBC paragraph 704.11.1
requires that a parapet wallrequires that a parapet wall
be at least 30 inches highbe at least 30 inches high
OSHA 1926 Subpart MOSHA 1926 Subpart M
requires a 39-45 inchrequires a 39-45 inch
guardrail or other fallguardrail or other fall
protectionprotection
If the design professionalIf the design professional
specifies a 39-45 inch highspecifies a 39-45 inch high
parapet wall, fall protectionparapet wall, fall protection
would not be requiredwould not be required
14. COURSE OBJECTIVESCOURSE OBJECTIVES
To provide design and constructionTo provide design and construction
professionals with skills to identifyprofessionals with skills to identify
construction safety hazardsconstruction safety hazards
To provide design and constructionTo provide design and construction
professionals with skills to eliminate orprofessionals with skills to eliminate or
reduce the risk of a serious injury in thereduce the risk of a serious injury in the
design phasedesign phase
15. COURSE OBJECTIVESCOURSE OBJECTIVES
Safety Engineering-skills to recognizeSafety Engineering-skills to recognize
hazards and uncover “hidden” hazardshazards and uncover “hidden” hazards
Design features to eliminate or reduceDesign features to eliminate or reduce
the risk of an injury due to a hazardthe risk of an injury due to a hazard
OSHA resources for DfCSOSHA resources for DfCS
16. Crash Course in Safety EngineeringCrash Course in Safety Engineering
Safety Engineering is a specialtySafety Engineering is a specialty
within the engineering field thatwithin the engineering field that
deals with the identification anddeals with the identification and
elimination of hazards.elimination of hazards.
Safety Engineering cuts across allSafety Engineering cuts across all
engineering disciplines: Civil,engineering disciplines: Civil,
Mechanical, Chemical, Electrical, asMechanical, Chemical, Electrical, as
well as many branches of science.well as many branches of science.
17. What is a Hazard?What is a Hazard?
AA HAZARDHAZARD is the potential to dois the potential to do
harm or damageharm or damage
RISKRISK is a measure of the probabilityis a measure of the probability
of a hazard-related incidentof a hazard-related incident
occurring and the severity of harm oroccurring and the severity of harm or
damagedamage
27. Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources
NFPA StandardsNFPA Standards
NFPA Volume 13, 53M Fire HazardsNFPA Volume 13, 53M Fire Hazards
in Oxygen Enriched Atmospheresin Oxygen Enriched Atmospheres
NFPA 654 Prevention of Fire andNFPA 654 Prevention of Fire and
Dust Explosions in the Chemical,Dust Explosions in the Chemical,
Dye, Pharmaceutical, and PlasticsDye, Pharmaceutical, and Plastics
IndustriesIndustries
NFPA 241 SafeguardingNFPA 241 Safeguarding
Construction, Alteration, andConstruction, Alteration, and
Demolition OperationsDemolition Operations
28. Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources
Government RegulationsGovernment Regulations
OSHA 1926.550 Cranes and derricksOSHA 1926.550 Cranes and derricks
OSHA 1926.251 Rigging Material forOSHA 1926.251 Rigging Material for
Material HandlingMaterial Handling
OSHA 1926.452 ScaffoldsOSHA 1926.452 Scaffolds
OSHA 1926.800 UndergroundOSHA 1926.800 Underground
ConstructionConstruction
OSHA 1926.52 Occupational NoiseOSHA 1926.52 Occupational Noise
ExposureExposure
29. Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources
NFPA StandardsNFPA Standards
NFPA 30 Flammable and CombustibleNFPA 30 Flammable and Combustible
LiquidsLiquids
NFPA 325M Fire Hazard Properties ofNFPA 325M Fire Hazard Properties of
Flammable Liquids, Gases & VolatileFlammable Liquids, Gases & Volatile
SolidsSolids
30. Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources
Government RegulationsGovernment Regulations
OSHA 1918.95 LongshoringOSHA 1918.95 Longshoring
Operations in the Vicinity of RepairOperations in the Vicinity of Repair
and Maintenance Workand Maintenance Work
OSHA 1926.1050-1053 StairwaysOSHA 1926.1050-1053 Stairways
and Laddersand Ladders
OSHA 1926.650 ExcavationsOSHA 1926.650 Excavations
Federal Motor Carrier SafetyFederal Motor Carrier Safety
RegulationsRegulations
34. Recognized Hazards-ExamplesRecognized Hazards-Examples
Power LinesPower Lines
Worker electrocuted when his
drill rig got too close to overhead
power lines.
Design engineer specified
groundwater monitoring wells
were to be dug directly under
power lines.
Engineer could have specified
wells be dug away from power
lines and/or better informed the
employer of hazard posed by
wells’ proximity to powerlines
through the plans, specifications,
and bid documents.
35. Hidden Hazards-ExamplesHidden Hazards-Examples
Underground utilitiesUnderground utilities
Electrical wire buried in a wallElectrical wire buried in a wall
AsbestosAsbestos
Rot/Decay of structural membersRot/Decay of structural members
Gas linesGas lines
Any hazard uncovered during projectAny hazard uncovered during project
executionexecution
36. Hidden Hazards-”What If” AnalysisHidden Hazards-”What If” Analysis
A “What If” analysis is a structuredA “What If” analysis is a structured
brainstorming methods of uncoveringbrainstorming methods of uncovering
hidden hazardshidden hazards
Select the boundaries of the reviewSelect the boundaries of the review
and assemble an experienced teamand assemble an experienced team
Gather information-video tapes ofGather information-video tapes of
operation, design documents,operation, design documents,
maintenance procedures, etc.maintenance procedures, etc.
37. Hidden Hazards-”What If” AnalysisHidden Hazards-”What If” Analysis
“What If” Situation Questions“What If” Situation Questions
Failure to follow proceduresFailure to follow procedures
Procedures are followed, but areProcedures are followed, but are
incorrectincorrect
Equipment failureEquipment failure
Utility failureUtility failure
WeatherWeather
Operator not trainedOperator not trained
38. Hidden Hazards-”What If” AnalysisHidden Hazards-”What If” Analysis
ExampleExample
Highway Construction Project-Highway Construction Project-
What if workers have to access drains? Are drainsWhat if workers have to access drains? Are drains
a possible confined space?a possible confined space?
What about the power lines? Will equipment beWhat about the power lines? Will equipment be
operating near power lines?operating near power lines?
What about worker/public injury from trafficWhat about worker/public injury from traffic
accidents? Do trucks have enough turning space?accidents? Do trucks have enough turning space?
Is there signage/barriers to re-direct pedestrians?Is there signage/barriers to re-direct pedestrians?
Will construction vehicles have enough shoulderWill construction vehicles have enough shoulder
space to stop on roadspace to stop on road
What if worker attempts to manually pick upWhat if worker attempts to manually pick up
drain covers? Are they lightweight? Do they havedrain covers? Are they lightweight? Do they have
handles?handles?
39. Hidden Hazards-Other MethodsHidden Hazards-Other Methods
Fault Tree AnalysisFault Tree Analysis
Design Check ListsDesign Check Lists
Plan review, if your gut feeling tellsPlan review, if your gut feeling tells
you that something is unsafe, ityou that something is unsafe, it
probably is.probably is.
Read case studies on constructionRead case studies on construction
accidentsaccidents
““Fatal Facts”Fatal Facts”
45. Design for Safety (DFS)Design for Safety (DFS)
Identify the hazard(s)Identify the hazard(s)
Assess the RiskAssess the Risk
Propose design features to eliminatePropose design features to eliminate
the risk or reduce it to an acceptablethe risk or reduce it to an acceptable
levellevel
46. DFS- Risk AssessmentDFS- Risk Assessment
Estimate Injury SeverityEstimate Injury Severity
SevereSevere-Death or serious debilitating-Death or serious debilitating
long-term injury such as amputationlong-term injury such as amputation
or comaor coma
SeriousSerious-Permanent or nonreversible-Permanent or nonreversible
injury that severely impactinjury that severely impact
enjoyment of life and may requireenjoyment of life and may require
continued treatmentcontinued treatment
47. DFS- Risk AssessmentDFS- Risk Assessment
Estimate Injury SeverityEstimate Injury Severity
ModerateModerate-Permanent or reversible-Permanent or reversible
minor injury that does notminor injury that does not
significantly impact enjoyment of life,significantly impact enjoyment of life,
but requires medical treatment.but requires medical treatment.
SlightSlight-Reversible injury requiring-Reversible injury requiring
simple medical treatment with nosimple medical treatment with no
confinementconfinement
48. DFS- Risk AssessmentDFS- Risk Assessment
Estimate Probability of HazardousEstimate Probability of Hazardous
EventEvent
HighHigh- Very likely to occur, protective- Very likely to occur, protective
measures are nearly worthlessmeasures are nearly worthless
MediumMedium-Occurrence is likely. The-Occurrence is likely. The
frequency of control measures isfrequency of control measures is
significant or control measures aresignificant or control measures are
inadequateinadequate
49. DFS- Risk AssessmentDFS- Risk Assessment
Estimate Probability of HazardousEstimate Probability of Hazardous
EventEvent
ModerateModerate-Occurrence is possible, but-Occurrence is possible, but
not likelynot likely
LowLow- Occurrence is so unlikely as to- Occurrence is so unlikely as to
be considered nearly zero.be considered nearly zero.
50. DFS-Risk Assessment MatrixDFS-Risk Assessment Matrix
SeveritySeverity
ProbabilityProbability SevereSevere SeriousSerious ModerateModerate SlightSlight
HighHigh High High Medium LowHigh High Medium Low
MediumMedium High Medium Low LowHigh Medium Low Low
ModerateModerate Medium Low Low NegligibleMedium Low Low Negligible
LowLow Low Low Negligible NegligibleLow Low Negligible Negligible
51. Other Forms of HazardOther Forms of Hazard
Identification/Prevention MatrixIdentification/Prevention Matrix11
1Hazard Information Foundation, Inc.1Hazard Information Foundation, Inc.
Eliminate the
Hazard
Guard the
Hazard
Provide a Safety
Factor
Provide
Redundancy
Provide
Reliability
Hazard Safety Hazard Safety Hazard Safety Hazard Safety
Natural
Structural/
Mechanical
Electrical
Chemical
Radiant
Energy
Biological
Artificial
Intelligence
52. DFS-Design HierarchyDFS-Design Hierarchy
First-Design out the hazardFirst-Design out the hazard
Second-Provide safety devicesSecond-Provide safety devices
Third-Provide warning devicesThird-Provide warning devices
Fourth- Implement operatingFourth- Implement operating
procedures and training programsprocedures and training programs
Fifth-Use personal protectiveFifth-Use personal protective
equipmentequipment
53. END OF CRASH COURSEEND OF CRASH COURSE
IN SAFETYIN SAFETY
ENGINEERINGENGINEERING
54. Typical Construction ProjectTypical Construction Project
ArrangementArrangement
Project owner separately contracts with aProject owner separately contracts with a
Architect/Engineer and with a generalArchitect/Engineer and with a general
contractor, prime contractor, constructioncontractor, prime contractor, construction
manager, program manager or owner’s agentmanager, program manager or owner’s agent
Above entities may subcontract out some orAbove entities may subcontract out some or
all of the work to specialty trade contractorsall of the work to specialty trade contractors
Project owners occasionally contract with aProject owners occasionally contract with a
design-build firm to perform both design anddesign-build firm to perform both design and
constructionconstruction
55. Root Causes for ConstructionRoot Causes for Construction
AccidentsAccidents11
Inadequate construction planningInadequate construction planning
Lack of proper trainingLack of proper training
Deficient enforcement of trainingDeficient enforcement of training
Unsafe equipmentUnsafe equipment
Unsafe methods or sequencingUnsafe methods or sequencing
Unsafe site conditionsUnsafe site conditions
Not using safety equipment that was providedNot using safety equipment that was provided
11
Toole, “Construction Site Safety Roles”, 2002Toole, “Construction Site Safety Roles”, 2002
56. Potential Areas of Concern inPotential Areas of Concern in
Construction SafetyConstruction Safety
FallsFalls
Hazardous materialsHazardous materials
Fire ProtectionFire Protection
ElectricalElectrical
ScaffoldingScaffolding
Floor and wall openings, stairways,Floor and wall openings, stairways,
laddersladders
57. Potential Areas of Concern inPotential Areas of Concern in
Construction SafetyConstruction Safety
Cranes, derricks, hoistsCranes, derricks, hoists
Material handling and storageMaterial handling and storage
Excavating and trenchingExcavating and trenching
Confined SpaceConfined Space
Work ZoneWork Zone
58. Potential Areas of Concern inPotential Areas of Concern in
Construction SafetyConstruction Safety
Trade specificTrade specific
Steel workersSteel workers
ElectricalElectrical
HVACHVAC
PlumbingPlumbing
ExcavatorsExcavators
ConcreteConcrete
59. Designing for Construction SafetyDesigning for Construction Safety
(DfCS) – What is it?(DfCS) – What is it?
An extension of DfS to coverAn extension of DfS to cover
construction projectsconstruction projects
Recognizes construction site safetyRecognizes construction site safety
as a design criterionas a design criterion
The process of addressingThe process of addressing
construction site safety and health inconstruction site safety and health in
the design of a projectthe design of a project
60. Designing for Construction SafetyDesigning for Construction Safety
ProcessProcess11
11
GambateseGambatese
Planning Preliminary
design/
Schematics
Design Construction Operation
and
Maintenance
Planning
Review
Prelim. Design Review
30% Review
90% Review
60% Review
64. DfCS Examples:DfCS Examples: Steell Design
Avoid hanging connections;Avoid hanging connections;
design to bear on columnsdesign to bear on columns
instead using safety seatsinstead using safety seats
Require holes in columns forRequire holes in columns for
tie lines 21” and 42” abovetie lines 21” and 42” above
each floor slabeach floor slab
Specify shop weldedSpecify shop welded
connections instead of boltsconnections instead of bolts
or field welds to avoidor field welds to avoid
dangerous positions duringdangerous positions during
erectionerection
Consider approximateConsider approximate
dimensions of connectiondimensions of connection
tools to prevent pinches ortools to prevent pinches or
awkward assembliesawkward assembliesNational Institute of Steel Detailing and SteelNational Institute of Steel Detailing and Steel
Erectors Association of America.Erectors Association of America. DetailingDetailing
Guide for the Enhancement of Erection Safety.Guide for the Enhancement of Erection Safety.
66. Other DfCS Design ExamplesOther DfCS Design Examples
Design underground utilities to be placedDesign underground utilities to be placed
using trenchless technologyusing trenchless technology11
Specify primers, sealers and otherSpecify primers, sealers and other
coatings that do not emit noxious fumescoatings that do not emit noxious fumes
or contain carcinogenic productsor contain carcinogenic products22
Design cable type lifeline system forDesign cable type lifeline system for
storage towersstorage towers33
11
Weinstein, “Can Design Improve Construction Safety”, 2005Weinstein, “Can Design Improve Construction Safety”, 2005
22
Gambatese, “Viability of Designing for Construction Worker Safety”, 2005Gambatese, “Viability of Designing for Construction Worker Safety”, 2005
33
Behm, “Linking Construction Fatalities to the Design for Construction SafetyBehm, “Linking Construction Fatalities to the Design for Construction Safety
Concept”, 2005Concept”, 2005
68. CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR
PUMPSPUMPS
Replacing circulator pumps requiresReplacing circulator pumps requires
a ladder,pumps are located in a tighta ladder,pumps are located in a tight
space.space.
Maintenance worker could fall offMaintenance worker could fall off
ladder, drop pump, or suffer handladder, drop pump, or suffer hand
injury from hitting adjacent pipinginjury from hitting adjacent piping
69. CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR
PUMPSPUMPS
Design review questions-Design review questions-
Is there enough room to replace theIs there enough room to replace the
pumps?pumps?
How high off the ground are the pumps?How high off the ground are the pumps?
What if a maintenance worker has to shutWhat if a maintenance worker has to shut
off a valve an emergency?off a valve an emergency?
70. CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR
PUMPSPUMPS
Identify Hazard-Identify Hazard-
Fall and mechanicalFall and mechanical
71. CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR
PUMPSPUMPS
Assess Risk-Assess Risk-
severity- slight (knuckles) to seriousseverity- slight (knuckles) to serious
(head injury)(head injury)
probability-medium (likely)probability-medium (likely)
risk- low to mediumrisk- low to medium
Additional consideration- solution isAdditional consideration- solution is
simple and inexpensivesimple and inexpensive
72. CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR
PUMPSPUMPS
SeveritySeverity
ProbabilityProbability SevereSevere SeriousSerious ModerateModerate SlightSlight
HighHigh High High Medium LowHigh High Medium Low
MediumMedium HighHigh Medium Low LowMedium Low Low
ModerateModerate Medium Low Low NegligibleMedium Low Low Negligible
LowLow Low Low Negligible NegligibleLow Low Negligible Negligible
73. CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR
PUMPSPUMPS
DfCS solution: design pumps close toDfCS solution: design pumps close to
ground level so that a ladder is notground level so that a ladder is not
required, provide adequate space aroundrequired, provide adequate space around
pumps, provide a metal identification tagpumps, provide a metal identification tag
for each valve and provide a permanentfor each valve and provide a permanent
identification board in the mechanicalidentification board in the mechanical
room that identifies each valve and it’sroom that identifies each valve and it’s
purpose.purpose.
75. CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2-
INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OFINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF
HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)
HVAC System installed in the attic ofHVAC System installed in the attic of
a commercial office buildinga commercial office building
No floor or platform/walkways wereNo floor or platform/walkways were
designed or installeddesigned or installed
HVAC technicians had to walk onHVAC technicians had to walk on
joists/trussesjoists/trusses
76. CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2-
INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OFINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF
HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)
Design review questionsDesign review questions
What will workers stand on when installingWhat will workers stand on when installing
HVAC system?HVAC system?
Will regular maintenance be required?Will regular maintenance be required?
What will the maintenance workers standWhat will the maintenance workers stand
on?on?
What are the pertinent OSHA regulations?What are the pertinent OSHA regulations?
77. CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2-
INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCEINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE
OF HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)OF HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)
78. CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2-
INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OFINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF
HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)
Design review questionsDesign review questions
What will workers stand on when installingWhat will workers stand on when installing
HVAC system?HVAC system?
Will regular maintenance be required?Will regular maintenance be required?
What will the maintenance workers standWhat will the maintenance workers stand
on?on?
What are the pertinent OSHA regulations?What are the pertinent OSHA regulations?
79. CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2-
INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OFINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF
HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)
Identify hazardIdentify hazard
FALLFALL
80. CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2-
INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OFINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF
HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)
Assess Risk-Assess Risk-
severity- serious (knee) to severeseverity- serious (knee) to severe
(death)(death)
probability-medium (likely)probability-medium (likely)
risk- medium to highrisk- medium to high
81. CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2-
INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF HVACINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF HVAC
SYSTEM (ATTIC)SYSTEM (ATTIC)
SeveritySeverity
ProbabilityProbability SevereSevere SeriousSerious ModerateModerate SlightSlight
HighHigh High High Medium LowHigh High Medium Low
MediumMedium High MediumHigh Medium Low LowLow Low
ModerateModerate Medium Low Low NegligibleMedium Low Low Negligible
LowLow Low Low Negligible NegligibleLow Low Negligible Negligible
82. CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2-
INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OFINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF
HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)
DfCS solution: design permanentDfCS solution: design permanent
platforms and walkways withplatforms and walkways with
guardrailsguardrails
83. CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL
RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY11
Plant utility worker was fatallyPlant utility worker was fatally
injured while performing clean-upinjured while performing clean-up
duties at a raw coal reclaim areaduties at a raw coal reclaim area
Victim either fell through a 56” x 80”Victim either fell through a 56” x 80”
opening in a platform or enteredopening in a platform or entered
through a coal feeder openingthrough a coal feeder opening
11
Case study courtesy of Washington Group InternationalCase study courtesy of Washington Group International
84. CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL
RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY
Design review questions-Design review questions-
Will workers need to have access toWill workers need to have access to
conveyors?conveyors?
Are covers and/or guardrailsAre covers and/or guardrails
provided for all openings near orprovided for all openings near or
over conveyors?over conveyors?
Are covers and/or guardrail gatesAre covers and/or guardrail gates
interlocked?interlocked?
85. CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL
RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY
86. CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL
RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY
Identify hazardIdentify hazard
MechanicalMechanical
87. CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL
RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY
Assess Risk-Assess Risk-
severity- severe (death)severity- severe (death)
probability-medium to highprobability-medium to high
risk- highrisk- high
88. CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL
RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY
SeveritySeverity
ProbabilityProbability SevereSevere SeriousSerious ModerateModerate SlightSlight
HighHigh HighHigh High Medium LowHigh Medium Low
MediumMedium HighHigh Medium Low LowMedium Low Low
ModerateModerate Medium Low Low NegligibleMedium Low Low Negligible
LowLow Low Low Negligible NegligibleLow Low Negligible Negligible
89. CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL
RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY
DfCS solution: design covers and/orDfCS solution: design covers and/or
guardrails over conveyor belts andguardrails over conveyor belts and
opening to conveyor belts. Designopening to conveyor belts. Design
interlocks for covers and gates.interlocks for covers and gates.
90. CASE STUDY #4-BLINDCASE STUDY #4-BLIND
PENETRATION INTO CONCRETEPENETRATION INTO CONCRETE11
A construction worker penetrated anA construction worker penetrated an
embedded electrical conduitembedded electrical conduit
containing an energized 120-volt linecontaining an energized 120-volt line
while hand drilling into a concretewhile hand drilling into a concrete
bean to install pipe hanger inserts.bean to install pipe hanger inserts.
The conduit was 1 inch from theThe conduit was 1 inch from the
surface.surface.
11
Dept. of Energy Blind Penetration IncidentsDept. of Energy Blind Penetration Incidents
91. CASE STUDY #4-BLINDCASE STUDY #4-BLIND
PENETRATION INTO CONCRETEPENETRATION INTO CONCRETE
Design review questionsDesign review questions
How will the worker install the pipeHow will the worker install the pipe
hangers?hangers?
Are there any electrical lines in theAre there any electrical lines in the
concrete beam?concrete beam?
Are there any pipe hangers that will beAre there any pipe hangers that will be
near an electrical line?near an electrical line?
92. CASE STUDY #4-BLINDCASE STUDY #4-BLIND
PENETRATION INTO CONCRETEPENETRATION INTO CONCRETE
Assess Risk-Assess Risk-
severity- severe (death)severity- severe (death)
probability- moderate to mediumprobability- moderate to medium
risk- medium to highrisk- medium to high
93. CASE STUDY #4-BLINDCASE STUDY #4-BLIND
PENETRATION INTO CONCRETEPENETRATION INTO CONCRETE
SeveritySeverity
ProbabilityProbability SevereSevere SeriousSerious ModerateModerate SlightSlight
HighHigh High High Medium LowHigh High Medium Low
MediumMedium HighHigh Medium Low LowMedium Low Low
ModerateModerate MediumMedium Low Low NegligibleLow Low Negligible
LowLow Low Low Negligible NegligibleLow Low Negligible Negligible
94. CASE STUDY #4-BLINDCASE STUDY #4-BLIND
PENETRATION INTO CONCRETEPENETRATION INTO CONCRETE
DfCS Solution: Design embeddedDfCS Solution: Design embedded
electrical lines deeper than theelectrical lines deeper than the
maximum depth of the pipe hangermaximum depth of the pipe hanger
bolts, clearly mark locations ofbolts, clearly mark locations of
electrical lines on contract drawingselectrical lines on contract drawings
95. CASE STUDY #5-INCINERATORCASE STUDY #5-INCINERATOR
CLEANOUTCLEANOUT11
An incinerator located adjacent to a main catwalk on 4An incinerator located adjacent to a main catwalk on 4thth
floorfloor
There was no catwalk from the main catwalk to theThere was no catwalk from the main catwalk to the
incineratorincinerator
Workers periodically had to go into incinerator to cleanWorkers periodically had to go into incinerator to clean
Workers used make shift planking to from main catwalk toWorkers used make shift planking to from main catwalk to
incineratorincinerator
11
Note the catwalk from the main catwalk to the incinerator with the yellow guardrails wasNote the catwalk from the main catwalk to the incinerator with the yellow guardrails was
not in place at the time the worker fell.not in place at the time the worker fell.
98. CASE STUDY #5-INCINERATORCASE STUDY #5-INCINERATOR
CLEANOUTCLEANOUT
Design review questions..Design review questions..
Will regular maintenance be required?Will regular maintenance be required?
How will the workers gain access to theHow will the workers gain access to the
incineratorincinerator
What are the pertinent OSHA regulations?What are the pertinent OSHA regulations?
100. CASE STUDY #5-INCINERATORCASE STUDY #5-INCINERATOR
CLEANOUTCLEANOUT
Assess Risk-Assess Risk-
severity- severe (death)severity- severe (death)
probability-medium (likely) to highprobability-medium (likely) to high
(very likely)(very likely)
risk- highrisk- high
101. CASE STUDY #-INCINERATOR CLEANOUTCASE STUDY #-INCINERATOR CLEANOUT
SeveritySeverity
ProbabilityProbability SevereSevere SeriousSerious ModerateModerate SlightSlight
HighHigh HighHigh High Medium LowHigh Medium Low
MediumMedium HighHigh Medium Low LowMedium Low Low
ModerateModerate Medium Low Low NegligibleMedium Low Low Negligible
LowLow Low Low Negligible NegligibleLow Low Negligible Negligible
102. CASE STUDY #5-INCINERATORCASE STUDY #5-INCINERATOR
CLEANOUTCLEANOUT
DfCS solution: design catwalk withDfCS solution: design catwalk with
guardrail and toeboards from mainguardrail and toeboards from main
catwalk to incinerator.catwalk to incinerator.
103. IDEAS FOR DESIGNERSIDEAS FOR DESIGNERS
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
Case StudiesCase Studies
Trimming tops of Concrete PilesTrimming tops of Concrete Piles
Modular Construction and Installation ofModular Construction and Installation of
ServicesServices
Temporary Support Steelwork for HighTemporary Support Steelwork for High
Level Work PlatformLevel Work Platform
Atrium LightingAtrium Lighting
Integrated Service Column / Panel DesignIntegrated Service Column / Panel Design
Prefabrication of SteelworkPrefabrication of Steelwork
Modular Construction of Stone PanelsModular Construction of Stone Panels
111. GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
Hazardous materialsHazardous materials
AsbestosAsbestos
Musculo-SkeletalMusculo-Skeletal
NoiseNoise
ExcavationsExcavations
Erection of StructuresErection of Structures
SteelworkSteelwork
112. GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
RefurbishmentRefurbishment
Temporary work equipmentTemporary work equipment
Work at heightWork at height
RoofsRoofs
Spatial DesignsSpatial Designs
Suspended Access EquipmentSuspended Access Equipment
BlockworkBlockwork
113. GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
DemolitionDemolition
Manual HandlingManual Handling
Lifting-cranesLifting-cranes
114.
115.
116. GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS
T 20.008 Work at HeightT 20.008 Work at Height11
Design service runs for so that they can beDesign service runs for so that they can be
maintained from floor abovemaintained from floor above
Pre-assembly and fitting of trussesPre-assembly and fitting of trusses
Position splices for steel columns so thePosition splices for steel columns so the
splices can be done from a finished floorsplices can be done from a finished floor
Install stairways early to avoid the needInstall stairways early to avoid the need
for temporary accessfor temporary access
Locate service equipment on ground ifLocate service equipment on ground if
possiblepossible
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
117. GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS
T 20.002 Erecting SteelworkT 20.002 Erecting Steelwork11
Check all steel members for erection loadsCheck all steel members for erection loads
Ensure that all slender members can resistEnsure that all slender members can resist
compression imposed by lifting slingscompression imposed by lifting slings
Maximize pre-fabricationMaximize pre-fabrication
Ensure the spacing of purlins allows forEnsure the spacing of purlins allows for
the largest component to lowered downthe largest component to lowered down
throughthrough
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
118. GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS
T 20.009 RoofsT 20.009 Roofs11
Provide anchors points for fallProvide anchors points for fall
protectionprotection
Ensure roof structure can handleEnsure roof structure can handle
stacks of materialsstacks of materials
Position gutters so that cleaning canPosition gutters so that cleaning can
be done from cherry pickers or frombe done from cherry pickers or from
safe access routessafe access routes
Consider parapetsConsider parapets
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
119. GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS
H 20.002 NOISEH 20.002 NOISE11
Cast in crack inducers rather thanCast in crack inducers rather than
saw cuttingsaw cutting
Cast in anchors rather than siteCast in anchors rather than site
drillingdrilling
Avoid vibro-compaction of groundAvoid vibro-compaction of ground
Keep site grinding, cutting, etc. to aKeep site grinding, cutting, etc. to a
minimumminimum
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
120. GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS
H 20.001Musculo-skeletalH 20.001Musculo-skeletal11
Provide adequate space for liftingProvide adequate space for lifting
machinesmachines
Design for machine laying of paversDesign for machine laying of pavers
Design brick laying to reduce longDesign brick laying to reduce long
duration repetitionduration repetition
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
121. GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS
H 10.001 Hazardous MaterialsH 10.001 Hazardous Materials11
Cast in chases for services ratherCast in chases for services rather
than cut to reduce dustthan cut to reduce dust
Specify water base or solvent freeSpecify water base or solvent free
paintspaints
Check to see if there any existingCheck to see if there any existing
contaminants on the site, alertcontaminants on the site, alert
workersworkers
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
122. Summary/ClosingSummary/Closing
Introduce the DfCS ProcessIntroduce the DfCS Process
Basic Safety EngineeringBasic Safety Engineering
Design FeaturesDesign Features
Case Studies to Illustrate ProcessCase Studies to Illustrate Process
124. DfCS Tools/ResourcesDfCS Tools/Resources
Construction Industry Institute databaseConstruction Industry Institute database
• www.construction-institute.org/scriptcontent/more/rwww.construction-institute.org/scriptcontent/more/rr
United Kingdom Health & Safety ExecutiveUnited Kingdom Health & Safety Executive
designer guidesdesigner guides
• www.hse.gov.uk/construction/designers/index.htwww.hse.gov.uk/construction/designers/index.ht
mm
CHAIRCHAIR
• www.workcover.nsw.gov.au/Publications/OHS/Safwww.workcover.nsw.gov.au/Publications/OHS/Saf
etyGuides/chairsafetyindesigntool.htmetyGuides/chairsafetyindesigntool.htm
OSHA WebsiteOSHA Website
• www.osha.govwww.osha.gov
125. DfCS Tools/ResourcesDfCS Tools/Resources
Inherently Safer Design Principles forInherently Safer Design Principles for
Construction, The Hazard InformationConstruction, The Hazard Information
Foundation, Inc.Foundation, Inc. besafe@hazardinfo.combesafe@hazardinfo.com
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
Editor's Notes
Early slide with compelling photos of elevated tasks and trenches and other dangerous conditions to get the audience’s attention.
Better photo of tilt up wall panel and photo of prefabricated plumbing tree instead of steel stairs (Jack Donovan to send) on DfCS prefabrication example slide.
Photo of permanent anchorage point on roof (John Mazourik) and cad drawing showing anchorage point locations (walter jones).
This presentation introduces the design for construction safety concept and demonstrates why it is important as one piece of a holistic approach to enhancing construction site safety. The presentation was developed by the Design for Construction Safety workgroup within the OSHA Alliance Program Construction Roundtable. The Roundtable is a collection of non-profit professional organizations and individual companies who are participating in the Alliance Program.
Designing for Construction Safety is the process of of addressing construction site safety and maintenance in the design phase of a project. The cusomary role of the design professional is protect the safety of the public and to comply with building codes. Designing for Construction Safety extends this role to include construction site safety.
There are currently no requirements for construction safety in modern building codes. The only buiding code construction safety requirement that currently exists addresses protection of the public.
pedestrian safety during cons
The invovlement of design professionals in the construction process is not a new idea. There are currently many sections in the OSHA 1926 standards which require engineering controls in construction projects.
This is one of the DfCS process models. Safety expectations are addressed in the beginning. There is trade contractor, QA, QC, owner, and contractor involvement throughout the design process. There are multiple reviews and re-designs. This all occurs before the drawings are finally issued for construction.
This graphic depicts the typical DfCS process. The key component of this process is the incorporation of site safety knowledge into design decisions. Ideally, site safety would be considered throughout the design process. It is recognized, however, that a limited number of progress reviews for safety may be more practical. The required site safety knowledge can be provided by one or more possible sources of such safety constructability expertise, including trade contractors, an in-house employee, or an outside consultant. In the future, perhaps state and federal OSHA employees may provide such expertise.
One question that sometimes is raised is whether the work product of a DfCS project looks different from that on standard projects. For now, the answer is “no.” That is, drawings and technical specifications on DfCS projects will likely at least initially look the same as typical documents, but they will reflect an inherently safer construction process. Eventually, it is hoped that construction documents resulting from a DfCS process will include safety enhancing details and notes that are not currently found on standard plans and specifications.
Unfortunately, as many of us know, construction is one of the most dangerous industries to work in. In the U.S., construction typically accounts for just under 200,000 serious injuries and 1200 deaths each year. The fatality rate is disproportionally high for the size of the construction workforce. But statistics like these do not tell the whole story. Behind every serious injury, there is a real story of an individual who suffered serious pain and may never fully recover. Behind every fatality, there are spouses, children and parents who grieve every day for their loss.
Because we all recognize that safety is an inherently dangerous business, all of us—including architects and engineers--must do what we can to reduce the risk of injuries on the projects we are involved in.
Note to presenter. You may or may not want to include this slide…. This slide indicates what this is all about., Behind every death or serious injury is a real live person. Many design decisions have a direct effect on construction accidents.
Because we all recognize that safety is an inherently dangerous business, all of us—including architects and engineers--must do what we can to reduce the risk of injuries on the projects we are involved in.
These are some of the construction fatailties based on occupation. As you can see, the oridinary consruction laborer has the highest fatility rate.
These are some of the most frequently cited OSHA violations in construction.
One of the reasons that the DfCS concept is so compelling is that all safety professionals know that it is much more effective to design safety into a process than it is to try to manage safety within a process that is inherently unsafe.
This chart has been adapted from the construction management literature. The ability to influence safety is on the vertical axis and the project schedule is on the horizontal axis. The chart shows that by including construction site safety as a consideration (along with production, quality, project scope, etc.) early in the project’s life cycle, one has a greater ability to positively influence construction site safety.
This concept is in contrast to the prevailing methods of planning for construction site safety, which do not begin until a short time before the construction phase, when the ability to influence safety is limited.
Studies have shown that design professionals can have significatn influence on construction safety. These are some statistics from the US and Europe
Because we all recognize that safety is an inherently dangerous business, all of us—including architects and engineers--must do what we can to reduce the risk of injuries on the projects we are involved in.
The idea that decisions by design professionals do influence jobsite safety is not an unproven concept. Various researchers have show that design can influence construction site safety, both positively and negatively. For example, a 1996 paper by Professor John Smallwood showed that 50% of general contractors interviewed identified poor design features as affecting safety. A European study published in 1991 found that 60% of accidents studied could have been eliminated or reduced with more thought during design (European Foundation 1991). Researchers in the UK found that design changes would have reduced likelihood of 47% of 100 construction accidents studied (Gibb et al 2004). In the U.S., Professor Mike Behm found that design was linked to accidents in approximately 22% of 226 injury incidents in OR, WA and CA and to 42% of 224 fatality incidents between 1990 and 2003 (Behm 2004).
These are some simple examples of how designers can influence construction safety. Specifying guards over skylights prevents workers from falling through. Design window sills and roof parapets at a specified height eliminates the need for fall protection.
One example is including a parapet roof that is at 1.0 m (39 in.) high. Such roofs serve eliminate the need for additional guardrails during roofing and rooftop HVAC appliance installation and prevent the need for fall protection during future maintenance.
Another example is designing upper story windows to be at least 1.0 m (39 in.) above the floor level. Having the window sill at this height allows it to function as a guardrail during construction.
Skylights are another example. Specifically, designers can:
Design permanent guardrails to be installed around skylights.
Design domed, rather than flat, skylights with shatterproof glass or strengthening wires.
Design the skylight to be installed on a raised curb.
Designers may not be familiar or have training fo identify construction safety hazards and have the skills to specify design features to eiliminate these hazrards
Many design engineers are not trained in safety engineering or may not be aware of the resources that are available to designers
Designing for construction safety (hereafter referred to as DfCS) represents a change from custom and practice whereby the design professional (that is, architects and/or engineers), and typically the project owner (that is, the client), become involved in facilitating construction site safety at the earliest stages of a project’s life cycle. DfCS is defined as the deliberate consideration of construction site safety in the design phase of a construction project. Many of you may be familiar with the term constructability, which usually refers to the idea of incorporating construction expertise into the design process to ensure the design is cost effective and buildable. Designing for construction safety can be viewed as ensuring the constructability review includes the safety aspects of the project.
It is important to note that the designing for construction safety concept applies only to the design of the permanent facility, that is, to the aspects of the completed building that make a project inherently safer to build. The designing for construction safety initiative does not focus on how to make different methods of construction engineering safer. For example, it does not focus on how to use fall protection systems, but it does include consideration of design decisions that influence how often fall protection will be needed. Similarly, DfCS does not address how to erect safe scaffolding, but it does relate to design decisions that influence the location and type of scaffolding needed to accomplish the work. Design professionals (i.e. architects and design engineers) are in a position for decision-making and influencing to help improve construction safety in these and many other areas.
For example, when the height of parapet walls is designed to be 42”, the parapet acts as a guardrail and enhances safety. When designed into the permanent structure of the building and sequenced early in construction, the parapet at this height acts to enhance safety during initial construction activities and also during subsequent maintenance and construction activities, such as roof repair. Without this consideration, constructors are solely responsible to design, prepare, and implement other temporary safety measures even if the design hinders the ease in which they are utilized.
A hazard is the potential to do harm or damage. Risk is trhe product of the probability and the severity. A low probablity and a high severity can have the same risk as a high probability and a low severity
It is important to note that the designing for construction safety concept applies only to the design of the permanent facility, that is, to the aspects of the completed building that make a project inherently safer to build. The designing for construction safety initiative does not focus on how to make different methods of construction engineering safer. For example, it does not focus on how to use fall protection systems, but it does include consideration of design decisions that influence how often fall protection will be needed. Similarly, DfCS does not address how to erect safe scaffolding, but it does relate to design decisions that influence the location and type of scaffolding needed to accomplish the work. Design professionals (i.e. architects and design engineers) are in a position for decision-making and influencing to help improve construction safety in these and many other areas.
For example, when the height of parapet walls is designed to be 42”, the parapet acts as a guardrail and enhances safety. When designed into the permanent structure of the building and sequenced early in construction, the parapet at this height acts to enhance safety during initial construction activities and also during subsequent maintenance and construction activities, such as roof repair. Without this consideration, constructors are solely responsible to design, prepare, and implement other temporary safety measures even if the design hinders the ease in which they are utilized.
There are many recognized hazards. Any process that involves gravity can create a hazard.
There are many hazards which are well-known such as tripping, slipping and mechancial hazards.These hazards are fairly easy to identify.
For example, when the height of parapet walls is designed to be 42”, the parapet acts as a guardrail and enhances safety. When designed into the permanent structure of the building and sequenced early in construction, the parapet at this height acts to enhance safety during initial construction activities and also during subsequent maintenance and construction activities, such as roof repair. Without this consideration, constructors are solely responsible to design, prepare, and implement other temporary safety measures even if the design hinders the ease in which they are utilized.
Anything that stores energy should be checked for a possible hazard as well as electrical and chemical sources
It is important to note that the designing for construction safety concept applies only to the design of the permanent facility, that is, to the aspects of the completed building that make a project inherently safer to build. The designing for construction safety initiative does not focus on how to make different methods of construction engineering safer. For example, it does not focus on how to use fall protection systems, but it does include consideration of design decisions that influence how often fall protection will be needed. Similarly, DfCS does not address how to erect safe scaffolding, but it does relate to design decisions that influence the location and type of scaffolding needed to accomplish the work. Design professionals (i.e. architects and design engineers) are in a position for decision-making and influencing to help improve construction safety in these and many other areas.
For example, when the height of parapet walls is designed to be 42”, the parapet acts as a guardrail and enhances safety. When designed into the permanent structure of the building and sequenced early in construction, the parapet at this height acts to enhance safety during initial construction activities and also during subsequent maintenance and construction activities, such as roof repair. Without this consideration, constructors are solely responsible to design, prepare, and implement other temporary safety measures even if the design hinders the ease in which they are utilized.
Biological and chemical agent as well as all forms of radiant energy are potential hazard sources
For example, when the height of parapet walls is designed to be 42”, the parapet acts as a guardrail and enhances safety. When designed into the permanent structure of the building and sequenced early in construction, the parapet at this height acts to enhance safety during initial construction activities and also during subsequent maintenance and construction activities, such as roof repair. Without this consideration, constructors are solely responsible to design, prepare, and implement other temporary safety measures even if the design hinders the ease in which they are utilized.
There are many standards which the design professional can use to identify hazards and provide safety measures. ANSI is a family of standards that can be used for this purpose. This is only a brief listing of some of the relevant ANSI standards.
ASTM is another family of standards that can provide guidance for recognized hazards.
NFPA is another organization that can provide guidance on recognized hazards. This is only a brief list of applicable NFPA standards.
Government regulations such as OSHA can be used by the design professional to identify and eiliminate hazads
There are many government agencies and standard writing organizations that can be used to design out hazards
This is an example of a classic fall hazard. The worker is exposed to an unprotected edge. The designer could specify anchorage points in the design so that the worker will have a tie off for fall protection. It should be noted that Designing for Construction Safety is not how or when to use fall protection, it is designing buildings so that either fall protection is not needed, or, installed hardware such as tie-offs.
Confined spaces are another recognized hazard. Designer can be heloful by designing areas that do not require confined space entry procesures. It should be noted that Design for Construction Safety is how to implement a confined space entry procedure, it is how to design projects so that confined space entry is not required.
This is another example where the design professional can eliminate hazards in the design stage of a project.
Here is a DfCS example that involves sitework rather than an actual structure. This photo is associated with a site on which a construction worker was killed (electrocuted) when the drill rig he was operating got too close to the overhead power lines. The project environmental engineer specified that groundwater monitoring wells were to be dug directly under the power lines. If the construction safety were considered in the design phase, the engineer would have either a) specified that the wells be dug in another position away from the overhead power lines, and/or b) informed the construction company through the plans, specifications, and bid documents of the hazard and provided the necessary contact information such that the construction company could have contacted the power company prior to arriving on site. Clearly, the constructor had a responsibility for his employee and the design for construction safety concept in no way suggests that employers do not have primary responsibility for the safety of their employees. But this case illustrates that simply considering the safety of site workers during the design phase can result in easy decisions that have a major influence on a project’s inherent level of risk.
There are many hazards that may be hidden. They are not readily apparent to the worker or the designer.
There are several analytical techniques that can be used to uncover “hidden hazards”. These include “What If” scenarios. Other methods include assembling an experienced team of professionals to review a project. Gathering as much information as possible about a project can also aid in uncovering hazards.
In a “what if” analysis the design professional or design team needs to brainstorm things that can go wrong (“what if”).
This is a sample of “what if” questions that might be included in the construction highway project. Each of the “what if” scenarios should be followed up by a design feature that can eliminate the hazard.
There are many other techniques and sources that can be used to identify hidden hazards.
The OSHA website has a catalog of “fatal facts” . These can be reviewed to become familiar with some of the things that occur in construction. Many of these might be called “Murphy’s Law”.
Designing for construction safety (hereafter referred to as DfCS) represents a change from custom and practice whereby the design professional (that is, architects and/or engineers), and typically the project owner (that is, the client), become involved in facilitating construction site safety at the earliest stages of a project’s life cycle. DfCS is defined as the deliberate consideration of construction site safety in the design phase of a construction project. Many of you may be familiar with the term constructability, which usually refers to the idea of incorporating construction expertise into the design process to ensure the design is cost effective and buildable. Designing for construction safety can be viewed as ensuring the constructability review includes the safety aspects of the project.
It is important to note that the designing for construction safety concept applies only to the design of the permanent facility, that is, to the aspects of the completed building that make a project inherently safer to build. The designing for construction safety initiative does not focus on how to make different methods of construction engineering safer. For example, it does not focus on how to use fall protection systems, but it does include consideration of design decisions that influence how often fall protection will be needed. Similarly, DfCS does not address how to erect safe scaffolding, but it does relate to design decisions that influence the location and type of scaffolding needed to accomplish the work. Design professionals (i.e. architects and design engineers) are in a position for decision-making and influencing to help improve construction safety in these and many other areas.
For example, when the height of parapet walls is designed to be 42”, the parapet acts as a guardrail and enhances safety. When designed into the permanent structure of the building and sequenced early in construction, the parapet at this height acts to enhance safety during initial construction activities and also during subsequent maintenance and construction activities, such as roof repair. Without this consideration, constructors are solely responsible to design, prepare, and implement other temporary safety measures even if the design hinders the ease in which they are utilized.
Designing for Safety involves identifying the hazards, assessing the risk, then proposing design features to eliminate the risk or reduce it to an acceptible level. Design for Saety in used in the design of machines, equipment, products, and facilities. Many design professionals have no formal training in safety and risk assessment.
The first step is to assess the risk.A very simple risk assessment is a qualitative analysis as follows. First, the injury severity is assesed, severe, serious, moderate or slight
Next the probability of occurranace is estimated, either high, medium, moderate or low.
Once the severity and the probality have been estimated, this matrix can be used to assess the risk. The risk ranges from high to negligable. Design action ranges from intervention (high) to no action (negligable).
There are other methods of hazard identification and prevention that can be used. This matrix was developed by the Hazard Information Foundation
Once the risk has been determined, the design professional proceeds to eliminate the risk or reduce it to an acceptible level by the design alternatives, designing out the hazard being the top priority, followed by providing safety devices, warning devices, operating procedures and training, and lastly providing personal protective equipment.
This ends the protion of this course that deals with safety engineering. The treatment here was an overview/introduction. The field of safety engineeing is much more broad and complicated than can be presented in this brief course. The reader is referred to the American Society of Safety Engineers, the National Safety Council, and the Board of Certified Safety Professionals for more information.
Now getting back to the main subject, that is how designers can prevent or reduce construction accidents. Construction is unique from other industries. For example, in general industry, the designers, assembly workers, management, and owners are generally all under one roof and all work for the same entity. There is generally more of a chain of command, responsibilities are more defined. This is not true in construction. An owner may purchase plans from a design professional. The owner may then contract with a general contractor, construction manager, or other agent. Any of these entities may sub-contract out work. The safety responsibilities become blurred. Some contractors may pass safety responsibilities onto others. No one follows up.
The result is that no decisions or poor decisions are made with regard to safety and someone gets injured or even killed. These are some of the root causes for construction accidents. Many of these causes are related to human error, but could have been prevented if a design feature would have eliminated the need for a site decision.
These are some of the areas where a design professional needs to be concerned about.
These are some of the trades that are involved in a construction project.
Designing for Construction Safety is an extension of the Design for Safety process (Hazard identification/hazard elimination/design hierarchy) to construcion. Construction safety becomes a design criteria.
This is another model of how the design for safety process fits in construction. The design process becomes part of the planning, rather than a task that ends when the plan are delivered .
Here are some examples. Prefabrication eliminates site work that can lead to accidents
The idea of identifying anchorage points on construction drawings is in accordance with Appendix C to Subpart M (Fall Protection) from the federal OSHA standards for Construction:
(h) Tie-off considerations (1) “One of the most important aspects of personal fall protection systems is fully planning the system before it is put into use. Probably the most overlooked component is planning for suitable anchorage points. Such planning should ideally be done before the structure or building is constructed so that anchorage points can be incorporated during construction for use later for window cleaning or other building maintenance. If properly planned, these anchorage points may be used during construction, as well as afterwards.”
Designing in anchorage points gives workers someplace to tie off on, rather than picking something that may not be structurally sound.
Many fall accidents occur in residential construction. By designing and installing tie-offs, roofers and cosntruction workers have something to tie off on when working on a residential roof.
This is a very simple example that illustrates the concept. In this boiler room, the circulator pumps where high up near the ceiling. A worker would have to stand on a ladder to replace the pumps, and would have to work in between the other piping.
These are some of the “what if” questions that can be asked
First we identify the hazard(s).The hazards are FALL (off the ladder) and MECHANICAL (cracking your knuckles in the tight space)
Next we assess the risk. The severity can be serious, a head injury from a fall. The probability is medium, it is likely to occur. The risk using the matrix is low to medium. It should be noted that the design feature in this case is simple and inexpensive
Once the severity and the probality have been estimated, this matrix can be used to assess the risk. The risk ranges from high to negligable. Design action ranges from intervention (high) to no action (negligable).
In this case the solution to eliminate the hazard was to place the pumps low enough so that a ladder would not be needed, and to put them in an area that was clear of other piping. This simple example shows how a designer can have an impact on construction safety without increasing cost, taking on additional liability, or involving the owner.
This is another case study that illustrates the Design for Construction Safety concept. An HVAC system was installed in the attic of a commercial office building. No floor or platform walkways were installed. HVAC technicians had to walk on the trusses to install the system and to maintain the system
Trying to walk on the joists was made more difficult when insulation was blown in. There was some narrow planking sent down, but it was not wide enough and was not secured.
Once the severity and the probality have been estimated, this matrix can be used to assess the risk. The risk ranges from high to negligable. Design action ranges from intervention (high) to no action (negligable).
In this case the hazard was recongnizable and the design solution straight forward, right out of the OSHA regulations
Here is another case study, coutesy of the Washington Group International
This the area were the worker fell
Once the severity and the probality have been estimated, this matrix can be used to assess the risk. The risk ranges from high to negligable. Design action ranges from intervention (high) to no action (negligable).
This is an example of a hidden hazard
This is an example where “what if” scenarios can be used to “flush out” the hazard.
Once the severity and the probality have been estimated, this matrix can be used to assess the risk. The risk ranges from high to negligable. Design action ranges from intervention (high) to no action (negligable).
Even with this hidden hazard, there are design decisions that can be made to eliminate or reduce the risk of an injury.
This is another case study that illustrates the Design for Construction Safety concept. An HVAC system was installed in the attic of a commercial office building. No floor or platform walkways were installed. HVAC technicians had to walk on the trusses to install the system and to maintain the system
This is a very simple example that illustrates the concept. In this boiler room, the circulator pumps where high up near the ceiling. A worker would have to stand on a ladder to replace the pumps, and would have to work in between the other piping.
This is a very simple example that illustrates the concept. In this boiler room, the circulator pumps where high up near the ceiling. A worker would have to stand on a ladder to replace the pumps, and would have to work in between the other piping.
Once the severity and the probality have been estimated, this matrix can be used to assess the risk. The risk ranges from high to negligable. Design action ranges from intervention (high) to no action (negligable).