SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 125
Design forDesign for
Construction Safety (DfCS)Construction Safety (DfCS)
2 to 4 Hour Course2 to 4 Hour Course
WHAT IS DESIGNING FORWHAT IS DESIGNING FOR
CONSTRUCTION SAFETY?CONSTRUCTION SAFETY?
The process of addressingThe process of addressing
construction site safety andconstruction site safety and
health, and planning forhealth, and planning for
future maintenance in thefuture maintenance in the
design phase of a project.design phase of a project.
WHY IS IT NECESSARY?WHY IS IT NECESSARY?
 Currently there are no requirements forCurrently there are no requirements for
construction safety in building codesconstruction safety in building codes
 IBC Chapter 33 Safeguards DuringIBC Chapter 33 Safeguards During
Construction-Pedestrian SafetyConstruction-Pedestrian Safety
OSHA 1926-Engineering ControlsOSHA 1926-Engineering Controls
 1926.452 Scaffolds1926.452 Scaffolds
 1926.502 Fall Protection Anchorages1926.502 Fall Protection Anchorages
 1926.552 Hoists1926.552 Hoists
 1926.652 Excavations1926.652 Excavations
 1926.703 Shoring1926.703 Shoring
 1926.705 Lift Slabs1926.705 Lift Slabs
DfCS ProcessDfCS Process11
-It’s a Team Concept-It’s a Team Concept
Design
Kickoff Design
Internal
Review
Issue for
Construction
External
Review
Trade contractor
involvement
• Establish design for
safety expectations
• Include construction and
operation perspective
• Identify design for safety
process and tools
• QA/QC
• Cross-
discipline
review
• Focused safety
review
• Owner review
1
Gambatese
U.S. Construction Accident StatisticsU.S. Construction Accident Statistics11
 Nearly 200,000 serious injuries and 1,226Nearly 200,000 serious injuries and 1,226
deaths each yeardeaths each year
 5.5% of workforce but 21.5% of fatalities5.5% of workforce but 21.5% of fatalities
 Construction has one of the highest fatalityConstruction has one of the highest fatality
rates of any industry sectorrates of any industry sector
11
Bureau of Labor Statistics-2006Bureau of Labor Statistics-2006
CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENTS INCONSTRUCTION ACCIDENTS IN
U.S.U.S.11
11
Photos courtesy of Washington Group InternationalPhotos courtesy of Washington Group International
CONSTRUCTION FATALITIES BYCONSTRUCTION FATALITIES BY
OCCUPATIONOCCUPATION11
 Total fatalities 1,226Total fatalities 1,226
 Construction laborers 360Construction laborers 360
 Electricians 117Electricians 117
 Carpenters 114Carpenters 114
 First Line supervisors 113First Line supervisors 113
 Roofers 82Roofers 82
 Painters and paper hangers 54Painters and paper hangers 54
 Structural steel 36Structural steel 36
11
BLS,2006BLS,2006
MOST FREQUENTLY CITED/HIGHESTMOST FREQUENTLY CITED/HIGHEST
PENALTY OSHA VIOLATIONS INPENALTY OSHA VIOLATIONS IN
CONSTRUCTIONCONSTRUCTION11
 Scaffolding 29 CFR 1926.451Scaffolding 29 CFR 1926.451
 Fall Protection 29 CFR 1926.501Fall Protection 29 CFR 1926.501
 Ladders 29 CFR 1926.1053Ladders 29 CFR 1926.1053
 Excavations 29 CFR 1926.651Excavations 29 CFR 1926.651
 Aerial Lifts 29 CFR 1926.453Aerial Lifts 29 CFR 1926.453
11
Most Frequently Cited Standards 2005 www.osha.govMost Frequently Cited Standards 2005 www.osha.gov
Considering Safety During DesignConsidering Safety During Design
Offers the Most PayoffOffers the Most Payoff11
Conceptual Design
Detailed Engineering
Procurement
Construction
Start-up
High
Low
Ability to
Influence
Safety
Project Schedule
1
Szymberski 1987
DESIGN CAN INFLUENCEDESIGN CAN INFLUENCE
CONSTRUCTION SAFETY1CONSTRUCTION SAFETY11,21,2
 22% of 226 injuries that occurred from 2000-2002 in Oregon,22% of 226 injuries that occurred from 2000-2002 in Oregon,
WA and CA linked to designWA and CA linked to design
 42% of 224 fatalities in US between 1990-2003 linked to42% of 224 fatalities in US between 1990-2003 linked to
designdesign
 In Europe, a 1991 study concluded that 60% of fatal accidentsIn Europe, a 1991 study concluded that 60% of fatal accidents
resulted from decisions made before site work beganresulted from decisions made before site work began
11
Behm, “Linking Construction Fatalities to the Design for Construction Safety Concept”, 2005Behm, “Linking Construction Fatalities to the Design for Construction Safety Concept”, 2005
22
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working ConditionsEuropean Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions
What Types of Design Decisions?What Types of Design Decisions?
 IBC paragraph 704.11.1IBC paragraph 704.11.1
requires that a parapet wallrequires that a parapet wall
be at least 30 inches highbe at least 30 inches high
 OSHA 1926 Subpart MOSHA 1926 Subpart M
requires a 39-45 inchrequires a 39-45 inch
guardrail or other fallguardrail or other fall
protectionprotection
 If the design professionalIf the design professional
specifies a 39-45 inch highspecifies a 39-45 inch high
parapet wall, fall protectionparapet wall, fall protection
would not be requiredwould not be required
DfCS Examples:DfCS Examples:
RoofsRoofs
Skylights Upper story windows
and roof parapets
COURSE OBJECTIVESCOURSE OBJECTIVES
 To provide design and constructionTo provide design and construction
professionals with skills to identifyprofessionals with skills to identify
construction safety hazardsconstruction safety hazards
 To provide design and constructionTo provide design and construction
professionals with skills to eliminate orprofessionals with skills to eliminate or
reduce the risk of a serious injury in thereduce the risk of a serious injury in the
design phasedesign phase
COURSE OBJECTIVESCOURSE OBJECTIVES
 Safety Engineering-skills to recognizeSafety Engineering-skills to recognize
hazards and uncover “hidden” hazardshazards and uncover “hidden” hazards
 Design features to eliminate or reduceDesign features to eliminate or reduce
the risk of an injury due to a hazardthe risk of an injury due to a hazard
 OSHA resources for DfCSOSHA resources for DfCS
Crash Course in Safety EngineeringCrash Course in Safety Engineering
 Safety Engineering is a specialtySafety Engineering is a specialty
within the engineering field thatwithin the engineering field that
deals with the identification anddeals with the identification and
elimination of hazards.elimination of hazards.
 Safety Engineering cuts across allSafety Engineering cuts across all
engineering disciplines: Civil,engineering disciplines: Civil,
Mechanical, Chemical, Electrical, asMechanical, Chemical, Electrical, as
well as many branches of science.well as many branches of science.
What is a Hazard?What is a Hazard?
 AA HAZARDHAZARD is the potential to dois the potential to do
harm or damageharm or damage
 RISKRISK is a measure of the probabilityis a measure of the probability
of a hazard-related incidentof a hazard-related incident
occurring and the severity of harm oroccurring and the severity of harm or
damagedamage
Recognized HazardsRecognized Hazards
 Gravity-Falls from elevationGravity-Falls from elevation
Falling objectsFalling objects
 Slopes-UpsetSlopes-Upset
RolloverRollover
Unstable surfacesUnstable surfaces
 Water- DrowningWater- Drowning
Recognized HazardsRecognized Hazards
 Walking/working surfaces-Walking/working surfaces-
tripping, slippingtripping, slipping
 Mechanical hazards-Mechanical hazards-
Rotation, reciprocation, shearing,Rotation, reciprocation, shearing,
vibration, pinch points, hydraulics,vibration, pinch points, hydraulics,
pneumatics, entanglementpneumatics, entanglement
Recognized HazardsRecognized Hazards
 Stored energy- springs, pneumaticsStored energy- springs, pneumatics
hydraulics, capacitorshydraulics, capacitors
 Electrical-electrostatic, current,Electrical-electrostatic, current,
voltage, sparks, arcsvoltage, sparks, arcs
 Chemical-corrosive, combustion,Chemical-corrosive, combustion,
toxictoxic
Recognized HazardsRecognized Hazards
 Biological-allergens, carcinogensBiological-allergens, carcinogens
 Radiant Energy-sound, nuclear,Radiant Energy-sound, nuclear,
X-rays, light, lasersX-rays, light, lasers
Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources
ANSI StandardsANSI Standards
 ANSI Z49.1 Safety in Welding and CuttingANSI Z49.1 Safety in Welding and Cutting
 ANSI Z117.1 Safety Requirements forANSI Z117.1 Safety Requirements for
Confined SpacesConfined Spaces
 ANSI D6.1 Manual on Uniform TrafficANSI D6.1 Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control DevicesControl Devices
 ANSI 10.8 Safety Requirements forANSI 10.8 Safety Requirements for
ScaffoldingScaffolding
 ANSI 14.2 Safety Requirements forANSI 14.2 Safety Requirements for
Portable LaddersPortable Ladders
Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources
ANSI StandardsANSI Standards
 ANSI Z93.1 Fire Hazards in OxygenANSI Z93.1 Fire Hazards in Oxygen
Enriched AtmospheresEnriched Atmospheres
 ANSI A14.4 Job Made WoodenANSI A14.4 Job Made Wooden
LaddersLadders
 ANSI A10.6-Safety Requirements forANSI A10.6-Safety Requirements for
Demolition OperationsDemolition Operations
 ANSI A1264.1-Safety RequirementsANSI A1264.1-Safety Requirements
for Workplace Floor and Wallfor Workplace Floor and Wall
Openings, Stairs & Railing SystemsOpenings, Stairs & Railing Systems
Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources
ANSI StandardsANSI Standards
 ANSI A10.13 Safety RequirementsANSI A10.13 Safety Requirements
for Steel erectionfor Steel erection
 ANSI A145.1 Recommended PracticeANSI A145.1 Recommended Practice
for Concrete Formworkfor Concrete Formwork
 ANSI Z244.1 Lockout/Tagout ofANSI Z244.1 Lockout/Tagout of
Energy SourcesEnergy Sources
Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources
ASTM StandardsASTM Standards
 ASTM F802 Guide for Selection ofASTM F802 Guide for Selection of
Certain Walkway Surfaces WhenCertain Walkway Surfaces When
Considering Footwear TrafficConsidering Footwear Traffic
 ASTM 04.09 Wood ConstructionASTM 04.09 Wood Construction
 ASTM D4532 Respirable Dust inASTM D4532 Respirable Dust in
Workplace AtmospheresWorkplace Atmospheres
 ASTM STP 1150 Fire Hazard and FireASTM STP 1150 Fire Hazard and Fire
Risk AssessmentRisk Assessment
Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources
ASTM StandardsASTM Standards
 ASTM O 4.07 Building Seals andASTM O 4.07 Building Seals and
SealantsSealants
Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources
NFPA StandardsNFPA Standards
 NFPA Volume 13, 53M Fire HazardsNFPA Volume 13, 53M Fire Hazards
in Oxygen Enriched Atmospheresin Oxygen Enriched Atmospheres
 NFPA 654 Prevention of Fire andNFPA 654 Prevention of Fire and
Dust Explosions in the Chemical,Dust Explosions in the Chemical,
Dye, Pharmaceutical, and PlasticsDye, Pharmaceutical, and Plastics
IndustriesIndustries
 NFPA 241 SafeguardingNFPA 241 Safeguarding
Construction, Alteration, andConstruction, Alteration, and
Demolition OperationsDemolition Operations
Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources
Government RegulationsGovernment Regulations
 OSHA 1926.550 Cranes and derricksOSHA 1926.550 Cranes and derricks
 OSHA 1926.251 Rigging Material forOSHA 1926.251 Rigging Material for
Material HandlingMaterial Handling
 OSHA 1926.452 ScaffoldsOSHA 1926.452 Scaffolds
 OSHA 1926.800 UndergroundOSHA 1926.800 Underground
ConstructionConstruction
 OSHA 1926.52 Occupational NoiseOSHA 1926.52 Occupational Noise
ExposureExposure
Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources
NFPA StandardsNFPA Standards
 NFPA 30 Flammable and CombustibleNFPA 30 Flammable and Combustible
LiquidsLiquids
 NFPA 325M Fire Hazard Properties ofNFPA 325M Fire Hazard Properties of
Flammable Liquids, Gases & VolatileFlammable Liquids, Gases & Volatile
SolidsSolids
Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources
Government RegulationsGovernment Regulations
 OSHA 1918.95 LongshoringOSHA 1918.95 Longshoring
Operations in the Vicinity of RepairOperations in the Vicinity of Repair
and Maintenance Workand Maintenance Work
 OSHA 1926.1050-1053 StairwaysOSHA 1926.1050-1053 Stairways
and Laddersand Ladders
 OSHA 1926.650 ExcavationsOSHA 1926.650 Excavations
 Federal Motor Carrier SafetyFederal Motor Carrier Safety
RegulationsRegulations
Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources
Other SourcesOther Sources
 National Safety CouncilNational Safety Council
 MSHAMSHA
 SAESAE
 NIOSHNIOSH
 US Army Corps of EngineersUS Army Corps of Engineers
 ACIACI
Recognized Hazards-ExamplesRecognized Hazards-Examples
Fall Hazards 6 Feet or MoreFall Hazards 6 Feet or More11
11
Photos courtesy of Washington Group InternationalPhotos courtesy of Washington Group International
Unprotected
edges
Recognized Hazards-ExamplesRecognized Hazards-Examples
Confined SpaceConfined Space
Recognized Hazards-ExamplesRecognized Hazards-Examples
Power LinesPower Lines
 Worker electrocuted when his
drill rig got too close to overhead
power lines.
 Design engineer specified
groundwater monitoring wells
were to be dug directly under
power lines.
 Engineer could have specified
wells be dug away from power
lines and/or better informed the
employer of hazard posed by
wells’ proximity to powerlines
through the plans, specifications,
and bid documents.
Hidden Hazards-ExamplesHidden Hazards-Examples
 Underground utilitiesUnderground utilities
 Electrical wire buried in a wallElectrical wire buried in a wall
 AsbestosAsbestos
 Rot/Decay of structural membersRot/Decay of structural members
 Gas linesGas lines
 Any hazard uncovered during projectAny hazard uncovered during project
executionexecution
Hidden Hazards-”What If” AnalysisHidden Hazards-”What If” Analysis
 A “What If” analysis is a structuredA “What If” analysis is a structured
brainstorming methods of uncoveringbrainstorming methods of uncovering
hidden hazardshidden hazards
 Select the boundaries of the reviewSelect the boundaries of the review
and assemble an experienced teamand assemble an experienced team
 Gather information-video tapes ofGather information-video tapes of
operation, design documents,operation, design documents,
maintenance procedures, etc.maintenance procedures, etc.
Hidden Hazards-”What If” AnalysisHidden Hazards-”What If” Analysis
“What If” Situation Questions“What If” Situation Questions
 Failure to follow proceduresFailure to follow procedures
 Procedures are followed, but areProcedures are followed, but are
incorrectincorrect
 Equipment failureEquipment failure
 Utility failureUtility failure
 WeatherWeather
 Operator not trainedOperator not trained
Hidden Hazards-”What If” AnalysisHidden Hazards-”What If” Analysis
ExampleExample
Highway Construction Project-Highway Construction Project-
 What if workers have to access drains? Are drainsWhat if workers have to access drains? Are drains
a possible confined space?a possible confined space?
 What about the power lines? Will equipment beWhat about the power lines? Will equipment be
operating near power lines?operating near power lines?
 What about worker/public injury from trafficWhat about worker/public injury from traffic
accidents? Do trucks have enough turning space?accidents? Do trucks have enough turning space?
Is there signage/barriers to re-direct pedestrians?Is there signage/barriers to re-direct pedestrians?
 Will construction vehicles have enough shoulderWill construction vehicles have enough shoulder
space to stop on roadspace to stop on road
 What if worker attempts to manually pick upWhat if worker attempts to manually pick up
drain covers? Are they lightweight? Do they havedrain covers? Are they lightweight? Do they have
handles?handles?
Hidden Hazards-Other MethodsHidden Hazards-Other Methods
 Fault Tree AnalysisFault Tree Analysis
 Design Check ListsDesign Check Lists
 Plan review, if your gut feeling tellsPlan review, if your gut feeling tells
you that something is unsafe, ityou that something is unsafe, it
probably is.probably is.
 Read case studies on constructionRead case studies on construction
accidentsaccidents
 ““Fatal Facts”Fatal Facts”
Fatal FactsFatal Facts
Fatal FactsFatal Facts
Fatal FactsFatal Facts
Fatal FactsFatal Facts
Fatal FactsFatal Facts
Design for Safety (DFS)Design for Safety (DFS)
 Identify the hazard(s)Identify the hazard(s)
 Assess the RiskAssess the Risk
 Propose design features to eliminatePropose design features to eliminate
the risk or reduce it to an acceptablethe risk or reduce it to an acceptable
levellevel
DFS- Risk AssessmentDFS- Risk Assessment
Estimate Injury SeverityEstimate Injury Severity
SevereSevere-Death or serious debilitating-Death or serious debilitating
long-term injury such as amputationlong-term injury such as amputation
or comaor coma
SeriousSerious-Permanent or nonreversible-Permanent or nonreversible
injury that severely impactinjury that severely impact
enjoyment of life and may requireenjoyment of life and may require
continued treatmentcontinued treatment
DFS- Risk AssessmentDFS- Risk Assessment
Estimate Injury SeverityEstimate Injury Severity
ModerateModerate-Permanent or reversible-Permanent or reversible
minor injury that does notminor injury that does not
significantly impact enjoyment of life,significantly impact enjoyment of life,
but requires medical treatment.but requires medical treatment.
SlightSlight-Reversible injury requiring-Reversible injury requiring
simple medical treatment with nosimple medical treatment with no
confinementconfinement
DFS- Risk AssessmentDFS- Risk Assessment
Estimate Probability of HazardousEstimate Probability of Hazardous
EventEvent
HighHigh- Very likely to occur, protective- Very likely to occur, protective
measures are nearly worthlessmeasures are nearly worthless
MediumMedium-Occurrence is likely. The-Occurrence is likely. The
frequency of control measures isfrequency of control measures is
significant or control measures aresignificant or control measures are
inadequateinadequate
DFS- Risk AssessmentDFS- Risk Assessment
Estimate Probability of HazardousEstimate Probability of Hazardous
EventEvent
ModerateModerate-Occurrence is possible, but-Occurrence is possible, but
not likelynot likely
LowLow- Occurrence is so unlikely as to- Occurrence is so unlikely as to
be considered nearly zero.be considered nearly zero.
DFS-Risk Assessment MatrixDFS-Risk Assessment Matrix
SeveritySeverity
ProbabilityProbability SevereSevere SeriousSerious ModerateModerate SlightSlight
HighHigh High High Medium LowHigh High Medium Low
MediumMedium High Medium Low LowHigh Medium Low Low
ModerateModerate Medium Low Low NegligibleMedium Low Low Negligible
LowLow Low Low Negligible NegligibleLow Low Negligible Negligible
Other Forms of HazardOther Forms of Hazard
Identification/Prevention MatrixIdentification/Prevention Matrix11
1Hazard Information Foundation, Inc.1Hazard Information Foundation, Inc.
  Eliminate the
Hazard
Guard the
Hazard
Provide a Safety
Factor
Provide
Redundancy
Provide
Reliability
Hazard Safety Hazard Safety Hazard Safety Hazard Safety
 
Natural                  
Structural/
Mechanical
                 
Electrical                  
Chemical                  
Radiant
Energy
                 
Biological                  
Artificial
Intelligence
                 
DFS-Design HierarchyDFS-Design Hierarchy
 First-Design out the hazardFirst-Design out the hazard
 Second-Provide safety devicesSecond-Provide safety devices
 Third-Provide warning devicesThird-Provide warning devices
 Fourth- Implement operatingFourth- Implement operating
procedures and training programsprocedures and training programs
 Fifth-Use personal protectiveFifth-Use personal protective
equipmentequipment
END OF CRASH COURSEEND OF CRASH COURSE
IN SAFETYIN SAFETY
ENGINEERINGENGINEERING
Typical Construction ProjectTypical Construction Project
ArrangementArrangement
 Project owner separately contracts with aProject owner separately contracts with a
Architect/Engineer and with a generalArchitect/Engineer and with a general
contractor, prime contractor, constructioncontractor, prime contractor, construction
manager, program manager or owner’s agentmanager, program manager or owner’s agent
 Above entities may subcontract out some orAbove entities may subcontract out some or
all of the work to specialty trade contractorsall of the work to specialty trade contractors
 Project owners occasionally contract with aProject owners occasionally contract with a
design-build firm to perform both design anddesign-build firm to perform both design and
constructionconstruction
Root Causes for ConstructionRoot Causes for Construction
AccidentsAccidents11
 Inadequate construction planningInadequate construction planning
 Lack of proper trainingLack of proper training
 Deficient enforcement of trainingDeficient enforcement of training
 Unsafe equipmentUnsafe equipment
 Unsafe methods or sequencingUnsafe methods or sequencing
 Unsafe site conditionsUnsafe site conditions
 Not using safety equipment that was providedNot using safety equipment that was provided
11
Toole, “Construction Site Safety Roles”, 2002Toole, “Construction Site Safety Roles”, 2002
Potential Areas of Concern inPotential Areas of Concern in
Construction SafetyConstruction Safety
 FallsFalls
 Hazardous materialsHazardous materials
 Fire ProtectionFire Protection
 ElectricalElectrical
 ScaffoldingScaffolding
 Floor and wall openings, stairways,Floor and wall openings, stairways,
laddersladders
Potential Areas of Concern inPotential Areas of Concern in
Construction SafetyConstruction Safety
 Cranes, derricks, hoistsCranes, derricks, hoists
 Material handling and storageMaterial handling and storage
 Excavating and trenchingExcavating and trenching
 Confined SpaceConfined Space
 Work ZoneWork Zone
Potential Areas of Concern inPotential Areas of Concern in
Construction SafetyConstruction Safety
 Trade specificTrade specific
Steel workersSteel workers
ElectricalElectrical
HVACHVAC
PlumbingPlumbing
ExcavatorsExcavators
ConcreteConcrete
Designing for Construction SafetyDesigning for Construction Safety
(DfCS) – What is it?(DfCS) – What is it?
 An extension of DfS to coverAn extension of DfS to cover
construction projectsconstruction projects
 Recognizes construction site safetyRecognizes construction site safety
as a design criterionas a design criterion
 The process of addressingThe process of addressing
construction site safety and health inconstruction site safety and health in
the design of a projectthe design of a project
Designing for Construction SafetyDesigning for Construction Safety
ProcessProcess11
11
GambateseGambatese
Planning Preliminary
design/
Schematics
Design Construction Operation
and
Maintenance
Planning
Review
Prelim. Design Review
30% Review
90% Review
60% Review
DfCS Examples:DfCS Examples: Prefabrication
Steel stairs
Concrete
Wall Panels
Concrete Segmented Bridge
DfCS Examples:DfCS Examples: Anchorage Points
DfCS Examples:DfCS Examples:
RoofsRoofs
Skylights Upper story windows
and roof parapets
DfCS Examples:DfCS Examples: Steell Design
 Avoid hanging connections;Avoid hanging connections;
design to bear on columnsdesign to bear on columns
instead using safety seatsinstead using safety seats
 Require holes in columns forRequire holes in columns for
tie lines 21” and 42” abovetie lines 21” and 42” above
each floor slabeach floor slab
 Specify shop weldedSpecify shop welded
connections instead of boltsconnections instead of bolts
or field welds to avoidor field welds to avoid
dangerous positions duringdangerous positions during
erectionerection
 Consider approximateConsider approximate
dimensions of connectiondimensions of connection
tools to prevent pinches ortools to prevent pinches or
awkward assembliesawkward assembliesNational Institute of Steel Detailing and SteelNational Institute of Steel Detailing and Steel
Erectors Association of America.Erectors Association of America. DetailingDetailing
Guide for the Enhancement of Erection Safety.Guide for the Enhancement of Erection Safety.
DfCS Examples: Residential FallDfCS Examples: Residential Fall
ProtectionProtection
Other DfCS Design ExamplesOther DfCS Design Examples
 Design underground utilities to be placedDesign underground utilities to be placed
using trenchless technologyusing trenchless technology11
 Specify primers, sealers and otherSpecify primers, sealers and other
coatings that do not emit noxious fumescoatings that do not emit noxious fumes
or contain carcinogenic productsor contain carcinogenic products22
 Design cable type lifeline system forDesign cable type lifeline system for
storage towersstorage towers33
11
Weinstein, “Can Design Improve Construction Safety”, 2005Weinstein, “Can Design Improve Construction Safety”, 2005
22
Gambatese, “Viability of Designing for Construction Worker Safety”, 2005Gambatese, “Viability of Designing for Construction Worker Safety”, 2005
33
Behm, “Linking Construction Fatalities to the Design for Construction SafetyBehm, “Linking Construction Fatalities to the Design for Construction Safety
Concept”, 2005Concept”, 2005
CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR
PUMPSPUMPS
CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR
PUMPSPUMPS
 Replacing circulator pumps requiresReplacing circulator pumps requires
a ladder,pumps are located in a tighta ladder,pumps are located in a tight
space.space.
 Maintenance worker could fall offMaintenance worker could fall off
ladder, drop pump, or suffer handladder, drop pump, or suffer hand
injury from hitting adjacent pipinginjury from hitting adjacent piping
CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR
PUMPSPUMPS
Design review questions-Design review questions-
Is there enough room to replace theIs there enough room to replace the
pumps?pumps?
How high off the ground are the pumps?How high off the ground are the pumps?
What if a maintenance worker has to shutWhat if a maintenance worker has to shut
off a valve an emergency?off a valve an emergency?
CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR
PUMPSPUMPS
Identify Hazard-Identify Hazard-
Fall and mechanicalFall and mechanical
CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR
PUMPSPUMPS
Assess Risk-Assess Risk-
severity- slight (knuckles) to seriousseverity- slight (knuckles) to serious
(head injury)(head injury)
probability-medium (likely)probability-medium (likely)
risk- low to mediumrisk- low to medium
Additional consideration- solution isAdditional consideration- solution is
simple and inexpensivesimple and inexpensive
CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR
PUMPSPUMPS
SeveritySeverity
ProbabilityProbability SevereSevere SeriousSerious ModerateModerate SlightSlight
HighHigh High High Medium LowHigh High Medium Low
MediumMedium HighHigh Medium Low LowMedium Low Low
ModerateModerate Medium Low Low NegligibleMedium Low Low Negligible
LowLow Low Low Negligible NegligibleLow Low Negligible Negligible
CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR
PUMPSPUMPS
DfCS solution: design pumps close toDfCS solution: design pumps close to
ground level so that a ladder is notground level so that a ladder is not
required, provide adequate space aroundrequired, provide adequate space around
pumps, provide a metal identification tagpumps, provide a metal identification tag
for each valve and provide a permanentfor each valve and provide a permanent
identification board in the mechanicalidentification board in the mechanical
room that identifies each valve and it’sroom that identifies each valve and it’s
purpose.purpose.
CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR
PUMPSPUMPS
CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2-
INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OFINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF
HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)
 HVAC System installed in the attic ofHVAC System installed in the attic of
a commercial office buildinga commercial office building
 No floor or platform/walkways wereNo floor or platform/walkways were
designed or installeddesigned or installed
 HVAC technicians had to walk onHVAC technicians had to walk on
joists/trussesjoists/trusses
CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2-
INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OFINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF
HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)
Design review questionsDesign review questions
What will workers stand on when installingWhat will workers stand on when installing
HVAC system?HVAC system?
Will regular maintenance be required?Will regular maintenance be required?
What will the maintenance workers standWhat will the maintenance workers stand
on?on?
What are the pertinent OSHA regulations?What are the pertinent OSHA regulations?
CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2-
INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCEINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE
OF HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)OF HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)
CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2-
INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OFINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF
HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)
Design review questionsDesign review questions
What will workers stand on when installingWhat will workers stand on when installing
HVAC system?HVAC system?
Will regular maintenance be required?Will regular maintenance be required?
What will the maintenance workers standWhat will the maintenance workers stand
on?on?
What are the pertinent OSHA regulations?What are the pertinent OSHA regulations?
CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2-
INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OFINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF
HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)
Identify hazardIdentify hazard
FALLFALL
CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2-
INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OFINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF
HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)
Assess Risk-Assess Risk-
severity- serious (knee) to severeseverity- serious (knee) to severe
(death)(death)
probability-medium (likely)probability-medium (likely)
risk- medium to highrisk- medium to high
CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2-
INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF HVACINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF HVAC
SYSTEM (ATTIC)SYSTEM (ATTIC)
SeveritySeverity
ProbabilityProbability SevereSevere SeriousSerious ModerateModerate SlightSlight
HighHigh High High Medium LowHigh High Medium Low
MediumMedium High MediumHigh Medium Low LowLow Low
ModerateModerate Medium Low Low NegligibleMedium Low Low Negligible
LowLow Low Low Negligible NegligibleLow Low Negligible Negligible
CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2-
INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OFINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF
HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)
DfCS solution: design permanentDfCS solution: design permanent
platforms and walkways withplatforms and walkways with
guardrailsguardrails
CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL
RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY11
 Plant utility worker was fatallyPlant utility worker was fatally
injured while performing clean-upinjured while performing clean-up
duties at a raw coal reclaim areaduties at a raw coal reclaim area
 Victim either fell through a 56” x 80”Victim either fell through a 56” x 80”
opening in a platform or enteredopening in a platform or entered
through a coal feeder openingthrough a coal feeder opening
11
Case study courtesy of Washington Group InternationalCase study courtesy of Washington Group International
CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL
RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY
Design review questions-Design review questions-
Will workers need to have access toWill workers need to have access to
conveyors?conveyors?
Are covers and/or guardrailsAre covers and/or guardrails
provided for all openings near orprovided for all openings near or
over conveyors?over conveyors?
Are covers and/or guardrail gatesAre covers and/or guardrail gates
interlocked?interlocked?
CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL
RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY
CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL
RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY
Identify hazardIdentify hazard
MechanicalMechanical
CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL
RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY
Assess Risk-Assess Risk-
severity- severe (death)severity- severe (death)
probability-medium to highprobability-medium to high
risk- highrisk- high
CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL
RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY
SeveritySeverity
ProbabilityProbability SevereSevere SeriousSerious ModerateModerate SlightSlight
HighHigh HighHigh High Medium LowHigh Medium Low
MediumMedium HighHigh Medium Low LowMedium Low Low
ModerateModerate Medium Low Low NegligibleMedium Low Low Negligible
LowLow Low Low Negligible NegligibleLow Low Negligible Negligible
CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL
RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY
DfCS solution: design covers and/orDfCS solution: design covers and/or
guardrails over conveyor belts andguardrails over conveyor belts and
opening to conveyor belts. Designopening to conveyor belts. Design
interlocks for covers and gates.interlocks for covers and gates.
CASE STUDY #4-BLINDCASE STUDY #4-BLIND
PENETRATION INTO CONCRETEPENETRATION INTO CONCRETE11
A construction worker penetrated anA construction worker penetrated an
embedded electrical conduitembedded electrical conduit
containing an energized 120-volt linecontaining an energized 120-volt line
while hand drilling into a concretewhile hand drilling into a concrete
bean to install pipe hanger inserts.bean to install pipe hanger inserts.
The conduit was 1 inch from theThe conduit was 1 inch from the
surface.surface.
11
Dept. of Energy Blind Penetration IncidentsDept. of Energy Blind Penetration Incidents
CASE STUDY #4-BLINDCASE STUDY #4-BLIND
PENETRATION INTO CONCRETEPENETRATION INTO CONCRETE
Design review questionsDesign review questions
How will the worker install the pipeHow will the worker install the pipe
hangers?hangers?
Are there any electrical lines in theAre there any electrical lines in the
concrete beam?concrete beam?
Are there any pipe hangers that will beAre there any pipe hangers that will be
near an electrical line?near an electrical line?
CASE STUDY #4-BLINDCASE STUDY #4-BLIND
PENETRATION INTO CONCRETEPENETRATION INTO CONCRETE
Assess Risk-Assess Risk-
severity- severe (death)severity- severe (death)
probability- moderate to mediumprobability- moderate to medium
risk- medium to highrisk- medium to high
CASE STUDY #4-BLINDCASE STUDY #4-BLIND
PENETRATION INTO CONCRETEPENETRATION INTO CONCRETE
SeveritySeverity
ProbabilityProbability SevereSevere SeriousSerious ModerateModerate SlightSlight
HighHigh High High Medium LowHigh High Medium Low
MediumMedium HighHigh Medium Low LowMedium Low Low
ModerateModerate MediumMedium Low Low NegligibleLow Low Negligible
LowLow Low Low Negligible NegligibleLow Low Negligible Negligible
CASE STUDY #4-BLINDCASE STUDY #4-BLIND
PENETRATION INTO CONCRETEPENETRATION INTO CONCRETE
DfCS Solution: Design embeddedDfCS Solution: Design embedded
electrical lines deeper than theelectrical lines deeper than the
maximum depth of the pipe hangermaximum depth of the pipe hanger
bolts, clearly mark locations ofbolts, clearly mark locations of
electrical lines on contract drawingselectrical lines on contract drawings
CASE STUDY #5-INCINERATORCASE STUDY #5-INCINERATOR
CLEANOUTCLEANOUT11
 An incinerator located adjacent to a main catwalk on 4An incinerator located adjacent to a main catwalk on 4thth
floorfloor
 There was no catwalk from the main catwalk to theThere was no catwalk from the main catwalk to the
incineratorincinerator
 Workers periodically had to go into incinerator to cleanWorkers periodically had to go into incinerator to clean
 Workers used make shift planking to from main catwalk toWorkers used make shift planking to from main catwalk to
incineratorincinerator
11
Note the catwalk from the main catwalk to the incinerator with the yellow guardrails wasNote the catwalk from the main catwalk to the incinerator with the yellow guardrails was
not in place at the time the worker fell.not in place at the time the worker fell.
CASE STUDY #5-INCINERATORCASE STUDY #5-INCINERATOR
CLEANOUTCLEANOUT
CASE STUDY #5-INCINERATORCASE STUDY #5-INCINERATOR
CLEANOUTCLEANOUT
CASE STUDY #5-INCINERATORCASE STUDY #5-INCINERATOR
CLEANOUTCLEANOUT
Design review questions..Design review questions..
Will regular maintenance be required?Will regular maintenance be required?
How will the workers gain access to theHow will the workers gain access to the
incineratorincinerator
What are the pertinent OSHA regulations?What are the pertinent OSHA regulations?
CASE STUDY #5-INCINERATORCASE STUDY #5-INCINERATOR
CLEANOUTCLEANOUT
Identify hazardIdentify hazard
FALLFALL
CASE STUDY #5-INCINERATORCASE STUDY #5-INCINERATOR
CLEANOUTCLEANOUT
Assess Risk-Assess Risk-
severity- severe (death)severity- severe (death)
probability-medium (likely) to highprobability-medium (likely) to high
(very likely)(very likely)
risk- highrisk- high
CASE STUDY #-INCINERATOR CLEANOUTCASE STUDY #-INCINERATOR CLEANOUT
SeveritySeverity
ProbabilityProbability SevereSevere SeriousSerious ModerateModerate SlightSlight
HighHigh HighHigh High Medium LowHigh Medium Low
MediumMedium HighHigh Medium Low LowMedium Low Low
ModerateModerate Medium Low Low NegligibleMedium Low Low Negligible
LowLow Low Low Negligible NegligibleLow Low Negligible Negligible
CASE STUDY #5-INCINERATORCASE STUDY #5-INCINERATOR
CLEANOUTCLEANOUT
DfCS solution: design catwalk withDfCS solution: design catwalk with
guardrail and toeboards from mainguardrail and toeboards from main
catwalk to incinerator.catwalk to incinerator.
IDEAS FOR DESIGNERSIDEAS FOR DESIGNERS
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
Case StudiesCase Studies
 Trimming tops of Concrete PilesTrimming tops of Concrete Piles
 Modular Construction and Installation ofModular Construction and Installation of
ServicesServices
 Temporary Support Steelwork for HighTemporary Support Steelwork for High
Level Work PlatformLevel Work Platform
 Atrium LightingAtrium Lighting
 Integrated Service Column / Panel DesignIntegrated Service Column / Panel Design
 Prefabrication of SteelworkPrefabrication of Steelwork
 Modular Construction of Stone PanelsModular Construction of Stone Panels
TRAILER ACCESS PLATFORMSTRAILER ACCESS PLATFORMS11
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
CAST-IN SOCKETS FORCAST-IN SOCKETS FOR
RAILINGSRAILINGS11
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
COLOR CODED BOLT BAGSCOLOR CODED BOLT BAGS11
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
SAFETY BARRIER TO LOADSAFETY BARRIER TO LOAD
PALLETS ONTO MEZZANINEPALLETS ONTO MEZZANINE11
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
PREFABRICATION OFPREFABRICATION OF
STEELWORKSTEELWORK11
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
MAINTENANCE LIFT TO ACCESSMAINTENANCE LIFT TO ACCESS
ATRIUM LIGHTINGATRIUM LIGHTING11
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
MODULAR SERVICE RISERSMODULAR SERVICE RISERS11
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
 Hazardous materialsHazardous materials
 AsbestosAsbestos
 Musculo-SkeletalMusculo-Skeletal
 NoiseNoise
 ExcavationsExcavations
 Erection of StructuresErection of Structures
 SteelworkSteelwork
GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
 RefurbishmentRefurbishment
 Temporary work equipmentTemporary work equipment
 Work at heightWork at height
 RoofsRoofs
 Spatial DesignsSpatial Designs
 Suspended Access EquipmentSuspended Access Equipment
 BlockworkBlockwork
GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
 DemolitionDemolition
 Manual HandlingManual Handling
 Lifting-cranesLifting-cranes
GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS
T 20.008 Work at HeightT 20.008 Work at Height11
 Design service runs for so that they can beDesign service runs for so that they can be
maintained from floor abovemaintained from floor above
 Pre-assembly and fitting of trussesPre-assembly and fitting of trusses
 Position splices for steel columns so thePosition splices for steel columns so the
splices can be done from a finished floorsplices can be done from a finished floor
 Install stairways early to avoid the needInstall stairways early to avoid the need
for temporary accessfor temporary access
 Locate service equipment on ground ifLocate service equipment on ground if
possiblepossible
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS
T 20.002 Erecting SteelworkT 20.002 Erecting Steelwork11
 Check all steel members for erection loadsCheck all steel members for erection loads
 Ensure that all slender members can resistEnsure that all slender members can resist
compression imposed by lifting slingscompression imposed by lifting slings
 Maximize pre-fabricationMaximize pre-fabrication
 Ensure the spacing of purlins allows forEnsure the spacing of purlins allows for
the largest component to lowered downthe largest component to lowered down
throughthrough
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS
T 20.009 RoofsT 20.009 Roofs11
 Provide anchors points for fallProvide anchors points for fall
protectionprotection
 Ensure roof structure can handleEnsure roof structure can handle
stacks of materialsstacks of materials
 Position gutters so that cleaning canPosition gutters so that cleaning can
be done from cherry pickers or frombe done from cherry pickers or from
safe access routessafe access routes
 Consider parapetsConsider parapets
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS
H 20.002 NOISEH 20.002 NOISE11
 Cast in crack inducers rather thanCast in crack inducers rather than
saw cuttingsaw cutting
 Cast in anchors rather than siteCast in anchors rather than site
drillingdrilling
 Avoid vibro-compaction of groundAvoid vibro-compaction of ground
 Keep site grinding, cutting, etc. to aKeep site grinding, cutting, etc. to a
minimumminimum
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS
H 20.001Musculo-skeletalH 20.001Musculo-skeletal11
 Provide adequate space for liftingProvide adequate space for lifting
machinesmachines
 Design for machine laying of paversDesign for machine laying of pavers
 Design brick laying to reduce longDesign brick laying to reduce long
duration repetitionduration repetition
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS
H 10.001 Hazardous MaterialsH 10.001 Hazardous Materials11
 Cast in chases for services ratherCast in chases for services rather
than cut to reduce dustthan cut to reduce dust
 Specify water base or solvent freeSpecify water base or solvent free
paintspaints
 Check to see if there any existingCheck to see if there any existing
contaminants on the site, alertcontaminants on the site, alert
workersworkers
11
www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
Summary/ClosingSummary/Closing
 Introduce the DfCS ProcessIntroduce the DfCS Process
 Basic Safety EngineeringBasic Safety Engineering
 Design FeaturesDesign Features
 Case Studies to Illustrate ProcessCase Studies to Illustrate Process
Summary/ClosingSummary/Closing
DESIGNERS CAN HAVE ADESIGNERS CAN HAVE A
POSITIVE IMPACT ONPOSITIVE IMPACT ON
REDUCING CONSTRUCTIONREDUCING CONSTRUCTION
ACCIDENTSACCIDENTS
DfCS Tools/ResourcesDfCS Tools/Resources
 Construction Industry Institute databaseConstruction Industry Institute database
• www.construction-institute.org/scriptcontent/more/rwww.construction-institute.org/scriptcontent/more/rr
 United Kingdom Health & Safety ExecutiveUnited Kingdom Health & Safety Executive
designer guidesdesigner guides
• www.hse.gov.uk/construction/designers/index.htwww.hse.gov.uk/construction/designers/index.ht
mm
 CHAIRCHAIR
• www.workcover.nsw.gov.au/Publications/OHS/Safwww.workcover.nsw.gov.au/Publications/OHS/Saf
etyGuides/chairsafetyindesigntool.htmetyGuides/chairsafetyindesigntool.htm
 OSHA WebsiteOSHA Website
• www.osha.govwww.osha.gov
DfCS Tools/ResourcesDfCS Tools/Resources
 Inherently Safer Design Principles forInherently Safer Design Principles for
Construction, The Hazard InformationConstruction, The Hazard Information
Foundation, Inc.Foundation, Inc. besafe@hazardinfo.combesafe@hazardinfo.com
 www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org

More Related Content

What's hot

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) by Atlantic Training
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) by Atlantic TrainingPersonal Protective Equipment (PPE) by Atlantic Training
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) by Atlantic TrainingAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Personal Protective Equipment and Tool Safety Training by Elizabethtown KCTCS
Personal Protective Equipment and Tool Safety Training by Elizabethtown KCTCSPersonal Protective Equipment and Tool Safety Training by Elizabethtown KCTCS
Personal Protective Equipment and Tool Safety Training by Elizabethtown KCTCSAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
2015 ISOSWO APWA Spring Conference: Review of PPE
2015 ISOSWO APWA Spring Conference: Review of PPE2015 ISOSWO APWA Spring Conference: Review of PPE
2015 ISOSWO APWA Spring Conference: Review of PPEisoswo
 
What makes coveralls an incredible safety garment
What makes coveralls an incredible safety garmentWhat makes coveralls an incredible safety garment
What makes coveralls an incredible safety garmentreachfirst01
 
Personal Protective Equipment Training by
Personal Protective Equipment Training byPersonal Protective Equipment Training by
Personal Protective Equipment Training byAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
PPE Safety
PPE SafetyPPE Safety
PPE Safetybronzecs
 
PPE training, developed 2014
PPE training, developed 2014PPE training, developed 2014
PPE training, developed 2014Eric Waidelich
 
Eye and Fact Training
Eye and Fact TrainingEye and Fact Training
Eye and Fact TrainingDan Junkins
 
personal protective equipment
personal protective equipmentpersonal protective equipment
personal protective equipmentRodrigo Moraes
 
Personal protective equipment
Personal protective equipmentPersonal protective equipment
Personal protective equipmentLeRoy Trusty
 
GROUP#20_Personal-protective-equipment
GROUP#20_Personal-protective-equipmentGROUP#20_Personal-protective-equipment
GROUP#20_Personal-protective-equipmentZaidi Zainudin
 
General Industry 2014 ppe newsletter
General Industry 2014 ppe newsletterGeneral Industry 2014 ppe newsletter
General Industry 2014 ppe newslettervtsiri
 

What's hot (20)

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) by Atlantic Training
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) by Atlantic TrainingPersonal Protective Equipment (PPE) by Atlantic Training
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) by Atlantic Training
 
Personal Protective Equipment and Tool Safety Training by Elizabethtown KCTCS
Personal Protective Equipment and Tool Safety Training by Elizabethtown KCTCSPersonal Protective Equipment and Tool Safety Training by Elizabethtown KCTCS
Personal Protective Equipment and Tool Safety Training by Elizabethtown KCTCS
 
2015 ISOSWO APWA Spring Conference: Review of PPE
2015 ISOSWO APWA Spring Conference: Review of PPE2015 ISOSWO APWA Spring Conference: Review of PPE
2015 ISOSWO APWA Spring Conference: Review of PPE
 
Ppe construction
Ppe constructionPpe construction
Ppe construction
 
What makes coveralls an incredible safety garment
What makes coveralls an incredible safety garmentWhat makes coveralls an incredible safety garment
What makes coveralls an incredible safety garment
 
PSC PPE Guidebook - 2018
PSC PPE Guidebook  - 2018PSC PPE Guidebook  - 2018
PSC PPE Guidebook - 2018
 
Personal Protective Equipment Training by
Personal Protective Equipment Training byPersonal Protective Equipment Training by
Personal Protective Equipment Training by
 
PPE Safety
PPE SafetyPPE Safety
PPE Safety
 
Personal Protective Equipment by OSHA
Personal Protective Equipment by OSHAPersonal Protective Equipment by OSHA
Personal Protective Equipment by OSHA
 
PPE by NSC
PPE by NSCPPE by NSC
PPE by NSC
 
Eye Protection
Eye ProtectionEye Protection
Eye Protection
 
PPE training, developed 2014
PPE training, developed 2014PPE training, developed 2014
PPE training, developed 2014
 
Eye and Fact Training
Eye and Fact TrainingEye and Fact Training
Eye and Fact Training
 
personal protective equipment
personal protective equipmentpersonal protective equipment
personal protective equipment
 
Eye and face protection by YALE
Eye and face protection  by YALEEye and face protection  by YALE
Eye and face protection by YALE
 
Personal protective equipment
Personal protective equipmentPersonal protective equipment
Personal protective equipment
 
GROUP#20_Personal-protective-equipment
GROUP#20_Personal-protective-equipmentGROUP#20_Personal-protective-equipment
GROUP#20_Personal-protective-equipment
 
General Industry 2014 ppe newsletter
General Industry 2014 ppe newsletterGeneral Industry 2014 ppe newsletter
General Industry 2014 ppe newsletter
 
Basics of PPE by PennState
Basics of PPE by PennStateBasics of PPE by PennState
Basics of PPE by PennState
 
Safety in the Workplace
Safety in the WorkplaceSafety in the Workplace
Safety in the Workplace
 

Viewers also liked

Electrical Safety in Construction by South Carolina State Association
Electrical Safety in Construction by South Carolina State AssociationElectrical Safety in Construction by South Carolina State Association
Electrical Safety in Construction by South Carolina State AssociationAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Construction Safety Training by Ohio Department of Transportation
Construction Safety Training by Ohio Department of TransportationConstruction Safety Training by Ohio Department of Transportation
Construction Safety Training by Ohio Department of TransportationAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Construction safety Management Training by NMMCC
Construction safety Management Training by NMMCCConstruction safety Management Training by NMMCC
Construction safety Management Training by NMMCCAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Construction Electrical Safety Training by South Carolina State Association
Construction Electrical Safety Training by South Carolina State AssociationConstruction Electrical Safety Training by South Carolina State Association
Construction Electrical Safety Training by South Carolina State AssociationAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Hand Signals for Crane Operations Training by Willis Safety Consulting
Hand Signals for Crane Operations Training by Willis Safety ConsultingHand Signals for Crane Operations Training by Willis Safety Consulting
Hand Signals for Crane Operations Training by Willis Safety ConsultingAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
For Construction at Your Pharmaceutical Facility Training by Torcon, Inc.
For Construction at Your Pharmaceutical Facility Training by Torcon, Inc.For Construction at Your Pharmaceutical Facility Training by Torcon, Inc.
For Construction at Your Pharmaceutical Facility Training by Torcon, Inc.Atlantic Training, LLC.
 
Back Safety & Safe Lifting by Bureau of Workers’ Comp PATHS
Back Safety & Safe Lifting by Bureau of Workers’ Comp PATHSBack Safety & Safe Lifting by Bureau of Workers’ Comp PATHS
Back Safety & Safe Lifting by Bureau of Workers’ Comp PATHSAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Preventing Back Injuries Training by PATHS
Preventing Back Injuries Training by PATHSPreventing Back Injuries Training by PATHS
Preventing Back Injuries Training by PATHSAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Construction site safety
Construction site safetyConstruction site safety
Construction site safetyDebajit Roy
 
Material Handling & Back Safety Training by Gary Beaudette
Material Handling & Back Safety Training by Gary BeaudetteMaterial Handling & Back Safety Training by Gary Beaudette
Material Handling & Back Safety Training by Gary BeaudetteAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Compressed Gas Safety by Texas Association of Manufacturers
Compressed Gas Safety by Texas Association of ManufacturersCompressed Gas Safety by Texas Association of Manufacturers
Compressed Gas Safety by Texas Association of ManufacturersAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Compressed Gasses by Blue Ridge Safety Association
Compressed Gasses by Blue Ridge Safety AssociationCompressed Gasses by Blue Ridge Safety Association
Compressed Gasses by Blue Ridge Safety AssociationAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Safe Handling of Compressed Gases by UCSD
Safe Handling of Compressed Gases by UCSDSafe Handling of Compressed Gases by UCSD
Safe Handling of Compressed Gases by UCSDAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Compressed Gas Cylinder Safety by Stonetrust
Compressed Gas Cylinder Safety by StonetrustCompressed Gas Cylinder Safety by Stonetrust
Compressed Gas Cylinder Safety by StonetrustAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Aerial Lift Safety Training by FHM Insurance
Aerial Lift Safety Training by FHM InsuranceAerial Lift Safety Training by FHM Insurance
Aerial Lift Safety Training by FHM InsuranceAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Roofing Operations & Aerial Lifts Training by NAHB
Roofing Operations & Aerial Lifts Training by NAHBRoofing Operations & Aerial Lifts Training by NAHB
Roofing Operations & Aerial Lifts Training by NAHBAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Scaffold And Aerial Lift Training by KTA
Scaffold And Aerial Lift Training by KTAScaffold And Aerial Lift Training by KTA
Scaffold And Aerial Lift Training by KTAAtlantic Training, LLC.
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Electrical Safety in Construction by South Carolina State Association
Electrical Safety in Construction by South Carolina State AssociationElectrical Safety in Construction by South Carolina State Association
Electrical Safety in Construction by South Carolina State Association
 
Construction Safety Training by Ohio Department of Transportation
Construction Safety Training by Ohio Department of TransportationConstruction Safety Training by Ohio Department of Transportation
Construction Safety Training by Ohio Department of Transportation
 
Construction safety Management Training by NMMCC
Construction safety Management Training by NMMCCConstruction safety Management Training by NMMCC
Construction safety Management Training by NMMCC
 
Construction Electrical Safety Training by South Carolina State Association
Construction Electrical Safety Training by South Carolina State AssociationConstruction Electrical Safety Training by South Carolina State Association
Construction Electrical Safety Training by South Carolina State Association
 
Hand Signals for Crane Operations Training by Willis Safety Consulting
Hand Signals for Crane Operations Training by Willis Safety ConsultingHand Signals for Crane Operations Training by Willis Safety Consulting
Hand Signals for Crane Operations Training by Willis Safety Consulting
 
For Construction at Your Pharmaceutical Facility Training by Torcon, Inc.
For Construction at Your Pharmaceutical Facility Training by Torcon, Inc.For Construction at Your Pharmaceutical Facility Training by Torcon, Inc.
For Construction at Your Pharmaceutical Facility Training by Torcon, Inc.
 
Back Safety & Safe Lifting by Bureau of Workers’ Comp PATHS
Back Safety & Safe Lifting by Bureau of Workers’ Comp PATHSBack Safety & Safe Lifting by Bureau of Workers’ Comp PATHS
Back Safety & Safe Lifting by Bureau of Workers’ Comp PATHS
 
Back & Lifting Safety by NPCA
Back & Lifting Safety by NPCABack & Lifting Safety by NPCA
Back & Lifting Safety by NPCA
 
Preventing Back Injuries Training by PATHS
Preventing Back Injuries Training by PATHSPreventing Back Injuries Training by PATHS
Preventing Back Injuries Training by PATHS
 
Construction site safety
Construction site safetyConstruction site safety
Construction site safety
 
Material Handling & Back Safety Training by Gary Beaudette
Material Handling & Back Safety Training by Gary BeaudetteMaterial Handling & Back Safety Training by Gary Beaudette
Material Handling & Back Safety Training by Gary Beaudette
 
Compressed Gases by BLR
Compressed Gases by BLRCompressed Gases by BLR
Compressed Gases by BLR
 
Compressed Gas Safety by Texas Association of Manufacturers
Compressed Gas Safety by Texas Association of ManufacturersCompressed Gas Safety by Texas Association of Manufacturers
Compressed Gas Safety by Texas Association of Manufacturers
 
Compressed Gasses by Blue Ridge Safety Association
Compressed Gasses by Blue Ridge Safety AssociationCompressed Gasses by Blue Ridge Safety Association
Compressed Gasses by Blue Ridge Safety Association
 
Safe Handling of Compressed Gases by UCSD
Safe Handling of Compressed Gases by UCSDSafe Handling of Compressed Gases by UCSD
Safe Handling of Compressed Gases by UCSD
 
Compressed Gas Cylinder Safety by Stonetrust
Compressed Gas Cylinder Safety by StonetrustCompressed Gas Cylinder Safety by Stonetrust
Compressed Gas Cylinder Safety by Stonetrust
 
Aerial Lift Safety Training by ANSV
Aerial Lift Safety Training by ANSVAerial Lift Safety Training by ANSV
Aerial Lift Safety Training by ANSV
 
Aerial Lift Safety Training by FHM Insurance
Aerial Lift Safety Training by FHM InsuranceAerial Lift Safety Training by FHM Insurance
Aerial Lift Safety Training by FHM Insurance
 
Roofing Operations & Aerial Lifts Training by NAHB
Roofing Operations & Aerial Lifts Training by NAHBRoofing Operations & Aerial Lifts Training by NAHB
Roofing Operations & Aerial Lifts Training by NAHB
 
Scaffold And Aerial Lift Training by KTA
Scaffold And Aerial Lift Training by KTAScaffold And Aerial Lift Training by KTA
Scaffold And Aerial Lift Training by KTA
 

Similar to Construction Safety Training by Alliance

Roof Edge Performance and Testing
Roof Edge Performance and TestingRoof Edge Performance and Testing
Roof Edge Performance and TestingHickmanMarketing
 
Excavation and-trenching safety 03
Excavation and-trenching safety 03Excavation and-trenching safety 03
Excavation and-trenching safety 03vppradeepkumar
 
International Bridge Design Standards and Approaches
International Bridge Design Standards and ApproachesInternational Bridge Design Standards and Approaches
International Bridge Design Standards and ApproachesAIT Solutions
 
From Performance to Resilience – A Recent Account of Seismic Design Philosoph...
From Performance to Resilience – A Recent Account of Seismic Design Philosoph...From Performance to Resilience – A Recent Account of Seismic Design Philosoph...
From Performance to Resilience – A Recent Account of Seismic Design Philosoph...AIT Solutions
 
Safety management in construction
Safety management in construction   Safety management in construction
Safety management in construction Dr K M SONI
 
Bridge code aashto aws d1.5
Bridge code aashto aws d1.5Bridge code aashto aws d1.5
Bridge code aashto aws d1.5James Gray
 
Mfc construction fy17
Mfc construction fy17Mfc construction fy17
Mfc construction fy17John Newquist
 
Strutture temporanee crosti ottobre 2014 sapienza
Strutture temporanee crosti ottobre 2014 sapienzaStrutture temporanee crosti ottobre 2014 sapienza
Strutture temporanee crosti ottobre 2014 sapienzaStroNGER2012
 
residential buliding by stadd pro
residential buliding by stadd proresidential buliding by stadd pro
residential buliding by stadd proila vamsi krishna
 
Shedspecificationmodule2017-2018
Shedspecificationmodule2017-2018Shedspecificationmodule2017-2018
Shedspecificationmodule2017-2018ShedSafe
 
Shedspecificationmodule2016 140921080921-phpapp01
Shedspecificationmodule2016 140921080921-phpapp01Shedspecificationmodule2016 140921080921-phpapp01
Shedspecificationmodule2016 140921080921-phpapp01ShedSafe
 
Response of Steel & CFT (Concrete Filled Tube) Frame Structures with Various ...
Response of Steel & CFT (Concrete Filled Tube) Frame Structures with Various ...Response of Steel & CFT (Concrete Filled Tube) Frame Structures with Various ...
Response of Steel & CFT (Concrete Filled Tube) Frame Structures with Various ...IRJET Journal
 
DESIGN AND ANALAYSIS OF MULTI STOREY BUILDING USING STAAD PRO
DESIGN AND ANALAYSIS OF MULTI STOREY BUILDING USING STAAD PRODESIGN AND ANALAYSIS OF MULTI STOREY BUILDING USING STAAD PRO
DESIGN AND ANALAYSIS OF MULTI STOREY BUILDING USING STAAD PROAli Meer
 
Excavation eschenasy
Excavation eschenasyExcavation eschenasy
Excavation eschenasyq q
 
Crawford Tracey AIA Course: Glazing Design
Crawford Tracey AIA Course: Glazing DesignCrawford Tracey AIA Course: Glazing Design
Crawford Tracey AIA Course: Glazing DesignDonovan and Associates
 
Performance Based Design, Value Engineering and Peer Review by Dr. Naveed Anwar
Performance Based Design, Value Engineering  and Peer Review by Dr. Naveed AnwarPerformance Based Design, Value Engineering  and Peer Review by Dr. Naveed Anwar
Performance Based Design, Value Engineering and Peer Review by Dr. Naveed AnwarAIT Solutions
 
Catalyzing Innovation in Performance-Based Design for Disaster Resilient Buil...
Catalyzing Innovation in Performance-Based Design for Disaster Resilient Buil...Catalyzing Innovation in Performance-Based Design for Disaster Resilient Buil...
Catalyzing Innovation in Performance-Based Design for Disaster Resilient Buil...AIT Solutions
 
Andrew barbina csm600report
Andrew barbina csm600reportAndrew barbina csm600report
Andrew barbina csm600reportAndrew Barbina
 

Similar to Construction Safety Training by Alliance (20)

Javier PPT
Javier PPTJavier PPT
Javier PPT
 
Roof Edge Performance and Testing
Roof Edge Performance and TestingRoof Edge Performance and Testing
Roof Edge Performance and Testing
 
Excavation and-trenching safety 03
Excavation and-trenching safety 03Excavation and-trenching safety 03
Excavation and-trenching safety 03
 
International Bridge Design Standards and Approaches
International Bridge Design Standards and ApproachesInternational Bridge Design Standards and Approaches
International Bridge Design Standards and Approaches
 
From Performance to Resilience – A Recent Account of Seismic Design Philosoph...
From Performance to Resilience – A Recent Account of Seismic Design Philosoph...From Performance to Resilience – A Recent Account of Seismic Design Philosoph...
From Performance to Resilience – A Recent Account of Seismic Design Philosoph...
 
Safety management in construction
Safety management in construction   Safety management in construction
Safety management in construction
 
Bridge code aashto aws d1.5
Bridge code aashto aws d1.5Bridge code aashto aws d1.5
Bridge code aashto aws d1.5
 
Mfc construction fy17
Mfc construction fy17Mfc construction fy17
Mfc construction fy17
 
Strutture temporanee crosti ottobre 2014 sapienza
Strutture temporanee crosti ottobre 2014 sapienzaStrutture temporanee crosti ottobre 2014 sapienza
Strutture temporanee crosti ottobre 2014 sapienza
 
residential buliding by stadd pro
residential buliding by stadd proresidential buliding by stadd pro
residential buliding by stadd pro
 
Building Codes and Zoning
Building Codes and ZoningBuilding Codes and Zoning
Building Codes and Zoning
 
Shedspecificationmodule2017-2018
Shedspecificationmodule2017-2018Shedspecificationmodule2017-2018
Shedspecificationmodule2017-2018
 
Shedspecificationmodule2016 140921080921-phpapp01
Shedspecificationmodule2016 140921080921-phpapp01Shedspecificationmodule2016 140921080921-phpapp01
Shedspecificationmodule2016 140921080921-phpapp01
 
Response of Steel & CFT (Concrete Filled Tube) Frame Structures with Various ...
Response of Steel & CFT (Concrete Filled Tube) Frame Structures with Various ...Response of Steel & CFT (Concrete Filled Tube) Frame Structures with Various ...
Response of Steel & CFT (Concrete Filled Tube) Frame Structures with Various ...
 
DESIGN AND ANALAYSIS OF MULTI STOREY BUILDING USING STAAD PRO
DESIGN AND ANALAYSIS OF MULTI STOREY BUILDING USING STAAD PRODESIGN AND ANALAYSIS OF MULTI STOREY BUILDING USING STAAD PRO
DESIGN AND ANALAYSIS OF MULTI STOREY BUILDING USING STAAD PRO
 
Excavation eschenasy
Excavation eschenasyExcavation eschenasy
Excavation eschenasy
 
Crawford Tracey AIA Course: Glazing Design
Crawford Tracey AIA Course: Glazing DesignCrawford Tracey AIA Course: Glazing Design
Crawford Tracey AIA Course: Glazing Design
 
Performance Based Design, Value Engineering and Peer Review by Dr. Naveed Anwar
Performance Based Design, Value Engineering  and Peer Review by Dr. Naveed AnwarPerformance Based Design, Value Engineering  and Peer Review by Dr. Naveed Anwar
Performance Based Design, Value Engineering and Peer Review by Dr. Naveed Anwar
 
Catalyzing Innovation in Performance-Based Design for Disaster Resilient Buil...
Catalyzing Innovation in Performance-Based Design for Disaster Resilient Buil...Catalyzing Innovation in Performance-Based Design for Disaster Resilient Buil...
Catalyzing Innovation in Performance-Based Design for Disaster Resilient Buil...
 
Andrew barbina csm600report
Andrew barbina csm600reportAndrew barbina csm600report
Andrew barbina csm600report
 

More from Atlantic Training, LLC.

Stress and Worker Safety by Pennsylvania L&I
Stress and Worker Safety by Pennsylvania L&IStress and Worker Safety by Pennsylvania L&I
Stress and Worker Safety by Pennsylvania L&IAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Workplace Harassment Prevention by UT EAP
Workplace Harassment Prevention by  UT EAPWorkplace Harassment Prevention by  UT EAP
Workplace Harassment Prevention by UT EAPAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Preventing Falls, Slips and Trips by MGSU
Preventing Falls, Slips and Trips by MGSUPreventing Falls, Slips and Trips by MGSU
Preventing Falls, Slips and Trips by MGSUAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Preventing Workplace Harassment by Pennsylvania L&I
Preventing Workplace Harassment by Pennsylvania L&IPreventing Workplace Harassment by Pennsylvania L&I
Preventing Workplace Harassment by Pennsylvania L&IAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Warehouses In Emergencies by WFP Logistics
Warehouses In Emergencies by WFP LogisticsWarehouses In Emergencies by WFP Logistics
Warehouses In Emergencies by WFP LogisticsAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace Training by Shumaker
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace Training by ShumakerSexual Harassment in the Workplace Training by Shumaker
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace Training by ShumakerAtlantic Training, LLC.
 
New Employee Safety Orientation by Oregon State University
New Employee Safety Orientation by Oregon State UniversityNew Employee Safety Orientation by Oregon State University
New Employee Safety Orientation by Oregon State UniversityAtlantic Training, LLC.
 

More from Atlantic Training, LLC. (20)

Wellness for Supervisors by SWOSU
Wellness for Supervisors by SWOSUWellness for Supervisors by SWOSU
Wellness for Supervisors by SWOSU
 
Workplace Wellness by PHA
Workplace Wellness by PHAWorkplace Wellness by PHA
Workplace Wellness by PHA
 
Stress Management Training by SG
Stress Management Training by  SGStress Management Training by  SG
Stress Management Training by SG
 
Stress Management Training by SW
Stress Management Training by SWStress Management Training by SW
Stress Management Training by SW
 
Stress and Worker Safety by Pennsylvania L&I
Stress and Worker Safety by Pennsylvania L&IStress and Worker Safety by Pennsylvania L&I
Stress and Worker Safety by Pennsylvania L&I
 
Respectful Workplace by RDTC
Respectful Workplace by RDTCRespectful Workplace by RDTC
Respectful Workplace by RDTC
 
Workplace Harassment by CLGW
Workplace Harassment by CLGWWorkplace Harassment by CLGW
Workplace Harassment by CLGW
 
Workplace Harassment Prevention by UT EAP
Workplace Harassment Prevention by  UT EAPWorkplace Harassment Prevention by  UT EAP
Workplace Harassment Prevention by UT EAP
 
Welding Safety by Pennsylvania L&I
Welding Safety by Pennsylvania L&IWelding Safety by Pennsylvania L&I
Welding Safety by Pennsylvania L&I
 
Slips Trips & Falls Training by Signal
Slips Trips & Falls Training by SignalSlips Trips & Falls Training by Signal
Slips Trips & Falls Training by Signal
 
Preventing Falls, Slips and Trips by MGSU
Preventing Falls, Slips and Trips by MGSUPreventing Falls, Slips and Trips by MGSU
Preventing Falls, Slips and Trips by MGSU
 
Preventing Workplace Harassment by Pennsylvania L&I
Preventing Workplace Harassment by Pennsylvania L&IPreventing Workplace Harassment by Pennsylvania L&I
Preventing Workplace Harassment by Pennsylvania L&I
 
Warehouses In Emergencies by WFP Logistics
Warehouses In Emergencies by WFP LogisticsWarehouses In Emergencies by WFP Logistics
Warehouses In Emergencies by WFP Logistics
 
Prevention of Sexual Harassment by USMC
Prevention of Sexual Harassment by USMCPrevention of Sexual Harassment by USMC
Prevention of Sexual Harassment by USMC
 
Sexual Harassment by DEOMI
Sexual Harassment by DEOMISexual Harassment by DEOMI
Sexual Harassment by DEOMI
 
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace Training by Shumaker
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace Training by ShumakerSexual Harassment in the Workplace Training by Shumaker
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace Training by Shumaker
 
Sexual Harassment Training by NAP
Sexual Harassment Training by NAPSexual Harassment Training by NAP
Sexual Harassment Training by NAP
 
Scaffolds Training by Pennsylvania L&I
Scaffolds Training by Pennsylvania L&IScaffolds Training by Pennsylvania L&I
Scaffolds Training by Pennsylvania L&I
 
Supervision
SupervisionSupervision
Supervision
 
New Employee Safety Orientation by Oregon State University
New Employee Safety Orientation by Oregon State UniversityNew Employee Safety Orientation by Oregon State University
New Employee Safety Orientation by Oregon State University
 

Recently uploaded

NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdfNewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdfKhaled Al Awadi
 
Fordham -How effective decision-making is within the IT department - Analysis...
Fordham -How effective decision-making is within the IT department - Analysis...Fordham -How effective decision-making is within the IT department - Analysis...
Fordham -How effective decision-making is within the IT department - Analysis...Peter Ward
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
Entrepreneurship lessons in Philippines
Entrepreneurship lessons in  PhilippinesEntrepreneurship lessons in  Philippines
Entrepreneurship lessons in PhilippinesDavidSamuel525586
 
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03DallasHaselhorst
 
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdfInnovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdfrichard876048
 
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith PereraKenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Pereraictsugar
 
Unlocking the Future: Explore Web 3.0 Workshop to Start Earning Today!
Unlocking the Future: Explore Web 3.0 Workshop to Start Earning Today!Unlocking the Future: Explore Web 3.0 Workshop to Start Earning Today!
Unlocking the Future: Explore Web 3.0 Workshop to Start Earning Today!Doge Mining Website
 
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdfShaun Heinrichs
 
The-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptx
The-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptxThe-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptx
The-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptxmbikashkanyari
 
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607dollysharma2066
 
PB Project 1: Exploring Your Personal Brand
PB Project 1: Exploring Your Personal BrandPB Project 1: Exploring Your Personal Brand
PB Project 1: Exploring Your Personal BrandSharisaBethune
 
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdfDarshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdfShashank Mehta
 
TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024
TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024
TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024Adnet Communications
 
Cyber Security Training in Office Environment
Cyber Security Training in Office EnvironmentCyber Security Training in Office Environment
Cyber Security Training in Office Environmentelijahj01012
 
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort ServiceCall US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Servicecallgirls2057
 
Annual General Meeting Presentation Slides
Annual General Meeting Presentation SlidesAnnual General Meeting Presentation Slides
Annual General Meeting Presentation SlidesKeppelCorporation
 

Recently uploaded (20)

NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdfNewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
 
Fordham -How effective decision-making is within the IT department - Analysis...
Fordham -How effective decision-making is within the IT department - Analysis...Fordham -How effective decision-making is within the IT department - Analysis...
Fordham -How effective decision-making is within the IT department - Analysis...
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
 
Entrepreneurship lessons in Philippines
Entrepreneurship lessons in  PhilippinesEntrepreneurship lessons in  Philippines
Entrepreneurship lessons in Philippines
 
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
 
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdfInnovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
 
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith PereraKenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
 
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
 
Unlocking the Future: Explore Web 3.0 Workshop to Start Earning Today!
Unlocking the Future: Explore Web 3.0 Workshop to Start Earning Today!Unlocking the Future: Explore Web 3.0 Workshop to Start Earning Today!
Unlocking the Future: Explore Web 3.0 Workshop to Start Earning Today!
 
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf
 
The-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptx
The-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptxThe-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptx
The-Ethical-issues-ghhhhhhhhjof-Byjus.pptx
 
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
 
PB Project 1: Exploring Your Personal Brand
PB Project 1: Exploring Your Personal BrandPB Project 1: Exploring Your Personal Brand
PB Project 1: Exploring Your Personal Brand
 
Corporate Profile 47Billion Information Technology
Corporate Profile 47Billion Information TechnologyCorporate Profile 47Billion Information Technology
Corporate Profile 47Billion Information Technology
 
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdfDarshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
 
TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024
TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024
TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024
 
Cyber Security Training in Office Environment
Cyber Security Training in Office EnvironmentCyber Security Training in Office Environment
Cyber Security Training in Office Environment
 
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort ServiceCall US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
 
Annual General Meeting Presentation Slides
Annual General Meeting Presentation SlidesAnnual General Meeting Presentation Slides
Annual General Meeting Presentation Slides
 

Construction Safety Training by Alliance

  • 1. Design forDesign for Construction Safety (DfCS)Construction Safety (DfCS) 2 to 4 Hour Course2 to 4 Hour Course
  • 2. WHAT IS DESIGNING FORWHAT IS DESIGNING FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY?CONSTRUCTION SAFETY? The process of addressingThe process of addressing construction site safety andconstruction site safety and health, and planning forhealth, and planning for future maintenance in thefuture maintenance in the design phase of a project.design phase of a project.
  • 3. WHY IS IT NECESSARY?WHY IS IT NECESSARY?  Currently there are no requirements forCurrently there are no requirements for construction safety in building codesconstruction safety in building codes  IBC Chapter 33 Safeguards DuringIBC Chapter 33 Safeguards During Construction-Pedestrian SafetyConstruction-Pedestrian Safety
  • 4. OSHA 1926-Engineering ControlsOSHA 1926-Engineering Controls  1926.452 Scaffolds1926.452 Scaffolds  1926.502 Fall Protection Anchorages1926.502 Fall Protection Anchorages  1926.552 Hoists1926.552 Hoists  1926.652 Excavations1926.652 Excavations  1926.703 Shoring1926.703 Shoring  1926.705 Lift Slabs1926.705 Lift Slabs
  • 5. DfCS ProcessDfCS Process11 -It’s a Team Concept-It’s a Team Concept Design Kickoff Design Internal Review Issue for Construction External Review Trade contractor involvement • Establish design for safety expectations • Include construction and operation perspective • Identify design for safety process and tools • QA/QC • Cross- discipline review • Focused safety review • Owner review 1 Gambatese
  • 6. U.S. Construction Accident StatisticsU.S. Construction Accident Statistics11  Nearly 200,000 serious injuries and 1,226Nearly 200,000 serious injuries and 1,226 deaths each yeardeaths each year  5.5% of workforce but 21.5% of fatalities5.5% of workforce but 21.5% of fatalities  Construction has one of the highest fatalityConstruction has one of the highest fatality rates of any industry sectorrates of any industry sector 11 Bureau of Labor Statistics-2006Bureau of Labor Statistics-2006
  • 7. CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENTS INCONSTRUCTION ACCIDENTS IN U.S.U.S.11 11 Photos courtesy of Washington Group InternationalPhotos courtesy of Washington Group International
  • 8. CONSTRUCTION FATALITIES BYCONSTRUCTION FATALITIES BY OCCUPATIONOCCUPATION11  Total fatalities 1,226Total fatalities 1,226  Construction laborers 360Construction laborers 360  Electricians 117Electricians 117  Carpenters 114Carpenters 114  First Line supervisors 113First Line supervisors 113  Roofers 82Roofers 82  Painters and paper hangers 54Painters and paper hangers 54  Structural steel 36Structural steel 36 11 BLS,2006BLS,2006
  • 9. MOST FREQUENTLY CITED/HIGHESTMOST FREQUENTLY CITED/HIGHEST PENALTY OSHA VIOLATIONS INPENALTY OSHA VIOLATIONS IN CONSTRUCTIONCONSTRUCTION11  Scaffolding 29 CFR 1926.451Scaffolding 29 CFR 1926.451  Fall Protection 29 CFR 1926.501Fall Protection 29 CFR 1926.501  Ladders 29 CFR 1926.1053Ladders 29 CFR 1926.1053  Excavations 29 CFR 1926.651Excavations 29 CFR 1926.651  Aerial Lifts 29 CFR 1926.453Aerial Lifts 29 CFR 1926.453 11 Most Frequently Cited Standards 2005 www.osha.govMost Frequently Cited Standards 2005 www.osha.gov
  • 10. Considering Safety During DesignConsidering Safety During Design Offers the Most PayoffOffers the Most Payoff11 Conceptual Design Detailed Engineering Procurement Construction Start-up High Low Ability to Influence Safety Project Schedule 1 Szymberski 1987
  • 11. DESIGN CAN INFLUENCEDESIGN CAN INFLUENCE CONSTRUCTION SAFETY1CONSTRUCTION SAFETY11,21,2  22% of 226 injuries that occurred from 2000-2002 in Oregon,22% of 226 injuries that occurred from 2000-2002 in Oregon, WA and CA linked to designWA and CA linked to design  42% of 224 fatalities in US between 1990-2003 linked to42% of 224 fatalities in US between 1990-2003 linked to designdesign  In Europe, a 1991 study concluded that 60% of fatal accidentsIn Europe, a 1991 study concluded that 60% of fatal accidents resulted from decisions made before site work beganresulted from decisions made before site work began 11 Behm, “Linking Construction Fatalities to the Design for Construction Safety Concept”, 2005Behm, “Linking Construction Fatalities to the Design for Construction Safety Concept”, 2005 22 European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working ConditionsEuropean Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions
  • 12. What Types of Design Decisions?What Types of Design Decisions?  IBC paragraph 704.11.1IBC paragraph 704.11.1 requires that a parapet wallrequires that a parapet wall be at least 30 inches highbe at least 30 inches high  OSHA 1926 Subpart MOSHA 1926 Subpart M requires a 39-45 inchrequires a 39-45 inch guardrail or other fallguardrail or other fall protectionprotection  If the design professionalIf the design professional specifies a 39-45 inch highspecifies a 39-45 inch high parapet wall, fall protectionparapet wall, fall protection would not be requiredwould not be required
  • 13. DfCS Examples:DfCS Examples: RoofsRoofs Skylights Upper story windows and roof parapets
  • 14. COURSE OBJECTIVESCOURSE OBJECTIVES  To provide design and constructionTo provide design and construction professionals with skills to identifyprofessionals with skills to identify construction safety hazardsconstruction safety hazards  To provide design and constructionTo provide design and construction professionals with skills to eliminate orprofessionals with skills to eliminate or reduce the risk of a serious injury in thereduce the risk of a serious injury in the design phasedesign phase
  • 15. COURSE OBJECTIVESCOURSE OBJECTIVES  Safety Engineering-skills to recognizeSafety Engineering-skills to recognize hazards and uncover “hidden” hazardshazards and uncover “hidden” hazards  Design features to eliminate or reduceDesign features to eliminate or reduce the risk of an injury due to a hazardthe risk of an injury due to a hazard  OSHA resources for DfCSOSHA resources for DfCS
  • 16. Crash Course in Safety EngineeringCrash Course in Safety Engineering  Safety Engineering is a specialtySafety Engineering is a specialty within the engineering field thatwithin the engineering field that deals with the identification anddeals with the identification and elimination of hazards.elimination of hazards.  Safety Engineering cuts across allSafety Engineering cuts across all engineering disciplines: Civil,engineering disciplines: Civil, Mechanical, Chemical, Electrical, asMechanical, Chemical, Electrical, as well as many branches of science.well as many branches of science.
  • 17. What is a Hazard?What is a Hazard?  AA HAZARDHAZARD is the potential to dois the potential to do harm or damageharm or damage  RISKRISK is a measure of the probabilityis a measure of the probability of a hazard-related incidentof a hazard-related incident occurring and the severity of harm oroccurring and the severity of harm or damagedamage
  • 18. Recognized HazardsRecognized Hazards  Gravity-Falls from elevationGravity-Falls from elevation Falling objectsFalling objects  Slopes-UpsetSlopes-Upset RolloverRollover Unstable surfacesUnstable surfaces  Water- DrowningWater- Drowning
  • 19. Recognized HazardsRecognized Hazards  Walking/working surfaces-Walking/working surfaces- tripping, slippingtripping, slipping  Mechanical hazards-Mechanical hazards- Rotation, reciprocation, shearing,Rotation, reciprocation, shearing, vibration, pinch points, hydraulics,vibration, pinch points, hydraulics, pneumatics, entanglementpneumatics, entanglement
  • 20. Recognized HazardsRecognized Hazards  Stored energy- springs, pneumaticsStored energy- springs, pneumatics hydraulics, capacitorshydraulics, capacitors  Electrical-electrostatic, current,Electrical-electrostatic, current, voltage, sparks, arcsvoltage, sparks, arcs  Chemical-corrosive, combustion,Chemical-corrosive, combustion, toxictoxic
  • 21. Recognized HazardsRecognized Hazards  Biological-allergens, carcinogensBiological-allergens, carcinogens  Radiant Energy-sound, nuclear,Radiant Energy-sound, nuclear, X-rays, light, lasersX-rays, light, lasers
  • 22. Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources ANSI StandardsANSI Standards  ANSI Z49.1 Safety in Welding and CuttingANSI Z49.1 Safety in Welding and Cutting  ANSI Z117.1 Safety Requirements forANSI Z117.1 Safety Requirements for Confined SpacesConfined Spaces  ANSI D6.1 Manual on Uniform TrafficANSI D6.1 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control DevicesControl Devices  ANSI 10.8 Safety Requirements forANSI 10.8 Safety Requirements for ScaffoldingScaffolding  ANSI 14.2 Safety Requirements forANSI 14.2 Safety Requirements for Portable LaddersPortable Ladders
  • 23. Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources ANSI StandardsANSI Standards  ANSI Z93.1 Fire Hazards in OxygenANSI Z93.1 Fire Hazards in Oxygen Enriched AtmospheresEnriched Atmospheres  ANSI A14.4 Job Made WoodenANSI A14.4 Job Made Wooden LaddersLadders  ANSI A10.6-Safety Requirements forANSI A10.6-Safety Requirements for Demolition OperationsDemolition Operations  ANSI A1264.1-Safety RequirementsANSI A1264.1-Safety Requirements for Workplace Floor and Wallfor Workplace Floor and Wall Openings, Stairs & Railing SystemsOpenings, Stairs & Railing Systems
  • 24. Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources ANSI StandardsANSI Standards  ANSI A10.13 Safety RequirementsANSI A10.13 Safety Requirements for Steel erectionfor Steel erection  ANSI A145.1 Recommended PracticeANSI A145.1 Recommended Practice for Concrete Formworkfor Concrete Formwork  ANSI Z244.1 Lockout/Tagout ofANSI Z244.1 Lockout/Tagout of Energy SourcesEnergy Sources
  • 25. Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources ASTM StandardsASTM Standards  ASTM F802 Guide for Selection ofASTM F802 Guide for Selection of Certain Walkway Surfaces WhenCertain Walkway Surfaces When Considering Footwear TrafficConsidering Footwear Traffic  ASTM 04.09 Wood ConstructionASTM 04.09 Wood Construction  ASTM D4532 Respirable Dust inASTM D4532 Respirable Dust in Workplace AtmospheresWorkplace Atmospheres  ASTM STP 1150 Fire Hazard and FireASTM STP 1150 Fire Hazard and Fire Risk AssessmentRisk Assessment
  • 26. Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources ASTM StandardsASTM Standards  ASTM O 4.07 Building Seals andASTM O 4.07 Building Seals and SealantsSealants
  • 27. Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources NFPA StandardsNFPA Standards  NFPA Volume 13, 53M Fire HazardsNFPA Volume 13, 53M Fire Hazards in Oxygen Enriched Atmospheresin Oxygen Enriched Atmospheres  NFPA 654 Prevention of Fire andNFPA 654 Prevention of Fire and Dust Explosions in the Chemical,Dust Explosions in the Chemical, Dye, Pharmaceutical, and PlasticsDye, Pharmaceutical, and Plastics IndustriesIndustries  NFPA 241 SafeguardingNFPA 241 Safeguarding Construction, Alteration, andConstruction, Alteration, and Demolition OperationsDemolition Operations
  • 28. Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources Government RegulationsGovernment Regulations  OSHA 1926.550 Cranes and derricksOSHA 1926.550 Cranes and derricks  OSHA 1926.251 Rigging Material forOSHA 1926.251 Rigging Material for Material HandlingMaterial Handling  OSHA 1926.452 ScaffoldsOSHA 1926.452 Scaffolds  OSHA 1926.800 UndergroundOSHA 1926.800 Underground ConstructionConstruction  OSHA 1926.52 Occupational NoiseOSHA 1926.52 Occupational Noise ExposureExposure
  • 29. Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources NFPA StandardsNFPA Standards  NFPA 30 Flammable and CombustibleNFPA 30 Flammable and Combustible LiquidsLiquids  NFPA 325M Fire Hazard Properties ofNFPA 325M Fire Hazard Properties of Flammable Liquids, Gases & VolatileFlammable Liquids, Gases & Volatile SolidsSolids
  • 30. Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources Government RegulationsGovernment Regulations  OSHA 1918.95 LongshoringOSHA 1918.95 Longshoring Operations in the Vicinity of RepairOperations in the Vicinity of Repair and Maintenance Workand Maintenance Work  OSHA 1926.1050-1053 StairwaysOSHA 1926.1050-1053 Stairways and Laddersand Ladders  OSHA 1926.650 ExcavationsOSHA 1926.650 Excavations  Federal Motor Carrier SafetyFederal Motor Carrier Safety RegulationsRegulations
  • 31. Recognized Hazards-SourcesRecognized Hazards-Sources Other SourcesOther Sources  National Safety CouncilNational Safety Council  MSHAMSHA  SAESAE  NIOSHNIOSH  US Army Corps of EngineersUS Army Corps of Engineers  ACIACI
  • 32. Recognized Hazards-ExamplesRecognized Hazards-Examples Fall Hazards 6 Feet or MoreFall Hazards 6 Feet or More11 11 Photos courtesy of Washington Group InternationalPhotos courtesy of Washington Group International Unprotected edges
  • 34. Recognized Hazards-ExamplesRecognized Hazards-Examples Power LinesPower Lines  Worker electrocuted when his drill rig got too close to overhead power lines.  Design engineer specified groundwater monitoring wells were to be dug directly under power lines.  Engineer could have specified wells be dug away from power lines and/or better informed the employer of hazard posed by wells’ proximity to powerlines through the plans, specifications, and bid documents.
  • 35. Hidden Hazards-ExamplesHidden Hazards-Examples  Underground utilitiesUnderground utilities  Electrical wire buried in a wallElectrical wire buried in a wall  AsbestosAsbestos  Rot/Decay of structural membersRot/Decay of structural members  Gas linesGas lines  Any hazard uncovered during projectAny hazard uncovered during project executionexecution
  • 36. Hidden Hazards-”What If” AnalysisHidden Hazards-”What If” Analysis  A “What If” analysis is a structuredA “What If” analysis is a structured brainstorming methods of uncoveringbrainstorming methods of uncovering hidden hazardshidden hazards  Select the boundaries of the reviewSelect the boundaries of the review and assemble an experienced teamand assemble an experienced team  Gather information-video tapes ofGather information-video tapes of operation, design documents,operation, design documents, maintenance procedures, etc.maintenance procedures, etc.
  • 37. Hidden Hazards-”What If” AnalysisHidden Hazards-”What If” Analysis “What If” Situation Questions“What If” Situation Questions  Failure to follow proceduresFailure to follow procedures  Procedures are followed, but areProcedures are followed, but are incorrectincorrect  Equipment failureEquipment failure  Utility failureUtility failure  WeatherWeather  Operator not trainedOperator not trained
  • 38. Hidden Hazards-”What If” AnalysisHidden Hazards-”What If” Analysis ExampleExample Highway Construction Project-Highway Construction Project-  What if workers have to access drains? Are drainsWhat if workers have to access drains? Are drains a possible confined space?a possible confined space?  What about the power lines? Will equipment beWhat about the power lines? Will equipment be operating near power lines?operating near power lines?  What about worker/public injury from trafficWhat about worker/public injury from traffic accidents? Do trucks have enough turning space?accidents? Do trucks have enough turning space? Is there signage/barriers to re-direct pedestrians?Is there signage/barriers to re-direct pedestrians?  Will construction vehicles have enough shoulderWill construction vehicles have enough shoulder space to stop on roadspace to stop on road  What if worker attempts to manually pick upWhat if worker attempts to manually pick up drain covers? Are they lightweight? Do they havedrain covers? Are they lightweight? Do they have handles?handles?
  • 39. Hidden Hazards-Other MethodsHidden Hazards-Other Methods  Fault Tree AnalysisFault Tree Analysis  Design Check ListsDesign Check Lists  Plan review, if your gut feeling tellsPlan review, if your gut feeling tells you that something is unsafe, ityou that something is unsafe, it probably is.probably is.  Read case studies on constructionRead case studies on construction accidentsaccidents  ““Fatal Facts”Fatal Facts”
  • 45. Design for Safety (DFS)Design for Safety (DFS)  Identify the hazard(s)Identify the hazard(s)  Assess the RiskAssess the Risk  Propose design features to eliminatePropose design features to eliminate the risk or reduce it to an acceptablethe risk or reduce it to an acceptable levellevel
  • 46. DFS- Risk AssessmentDFS- Risk Assessment Estimate Injury SeverityEstimate Injury Severity SevereSevere-Death or serious debilitating-Death or serious debilitating long-term injury such as amputationlong-term injury such as amputation or comaor coma SeriousSerious-Permanent or nonreversible-Permanent or nonreversible injury that severely impactinjury that severely impact enjoyment of life and may requireenjoyment of life and may require continued treatmentcontinued treatment
  • 47. DFS- Risk AssessmentDFS- Risk Assessment Estimate Injury SeverityEstimate Injury Severity ModerateModerate-Permanent or reversible-Permanent or reversible minor injury that does notminor injury that does not significantly impact enjoyment of life,significantly impact enjoyment of life, but requires medical treatment.but requires medical treatment. SlightSlight-Reversible injury requiring-Reversible injury requiring simple medical treatment with nosimple medical treatment with no confinementconfinement
  • 48. DFS- Risk AssessmentDFS- Risk Assessment Estimate Probability of HazardousEstimate Probability of Hazardous EventEvent HighHigh- Very likely to occur, protective- Very likely to occur, protective measures are nearly worthlessmeasures are nearly worthless MediumMedium-Occurrence is likely. The-Occurrence is likely. The frequency of control measures isfrequency of control measures is significant or control measures aresignificant or control measures are inadequateinadequate
  • 49. DFS- Risk AssessmentDFS- Risk Assessment Estimate Probability of HazardousEstimate Probability of Hazardous EventEvent ModerateModerate-Occurrence is possible, but-Occurrence is possible, but not likelynot likely LowLow- Occurrence is so unlikely as to- Occurrence is so unlikely as to be considered nearly zero.be considered nearly zero.
  • 50. DFS-Risk Assessment MatrixDFS-Risk Assessment Matrix SeveritySeverity ProbabilityProbability SevereSevere SeriousSerious ModerateModerate SlightSlight HighHigh High High Medium LowHigh High Medium Low MediumMedium High Medium Low LowHigh Medium Low Low ModerateModerate Medium Low Low NegligibleMedium Low Low Negligible LowLow Low Low Negligible NegligibleLow Low Negligible Negligible
  • 51. Other Forms of HazardOther Forms of Hazard Identification/Prevention MatrixIdentification/Prevention Matrix11 1Hazard Information Foundation, Inc.1Hazard Information Foundation, Inc.   Eliminate the Hazard Guard the Hazard Provide a Safety Factor Provide Redundancy Provide Reliability Hazard Safety Hazard Safety Hazard Safety Hazard Safety   Natural                   Structural/ Mechanical                   Electrical                   Chemical                   Radiant Energy                   Biological                   Artificial Intelligence                  
  • 52. DFS-Design HierarchyDFS-Design Hierarchy  First-Design out the hazardFirst-Design out the hazard  Second-Provide safety devicesSecond-Provide safety devices  Third-Provide warning devicesThird-Provide warning devices  Fourth- Implement operatingFourth- Implement operating procedures and training programsprocedures and training programs  Fifth-Use personal protectiveFifth-Use personal protective equipmentequipment
  • 53. END OF CRASH COURSEEND OF CRASH COURSE IN SAFETYIN SAFETY ENGINEERINGENGINEERING
  • 54. Typical Construction ProjectTypical Construction Project ArrangementArrangement  Project owner separately contracts with aProject owner separately contracts with a Architect/Engineer and with a generalArchitect/Engineer and with a general contractor, prime contractor, constructioncontractor, prime contractor, construction manager, program manager or owner’s agentmanager, program manager or owner’s agent  Above entities may subcontract out some orAbove entities may subcontract out some or all of the work to specialty trade contractorsall of the work to specialty trade contractors  Project owners occasionally contract with aProject owners occasionally contract with a design-build firm to perform both design anddesign-build firm to perform both design and constructionconstruction
  • 55. Root Causes for ConstructionRoot Causes for Construction AccidentsAccidents11  Inadequate construction planningInadequate construction planning  Lack of proper trainingLack of proper training  Deficient enforcement of trainingDeficient enforcement of training  Unsafe equipmentUnsafe equipment  Unsafe methods or sequencingUnsafe methods or sequencing  Unsafe site conditionsUnsafe site conditions  Not using safety equipment that was providedNot using safety equipment that was provided 11 Toole, “Construction Site Safety Roles”, 2002Toole, “Construction Site Safety Roles”, 2002
  • 56. Potential Areas of Concern inPotential Areas of Concern in Construction SafetyConstruction Safety  FallsFalls  Hazardous materialsHazardous materials  Fire ProtectionFire Protection  ElectricalElectrical  ScaffoldingScaffolding  Floor and wall openings, stairways,Floor and wall openings, stairways, laddersladders
  • 57. Potential Areas of Concern inPotential Areas of Concern in Construction SafetyConstruction Safety  Cranes, derricks, hoistsCranes, derricks, hoists  Material handling and storageMaterial handling and storage  Excavating and trenchingExcavating and trenching  Confined SpaceConfined Space  Work ZoneWork Zone
  • 58. Potential Areas of Concern inPotential Areas of Concern in Construction SafetyConstruction Safety  Trade specificTrade specific Steel workersSteel workers ElectricalElectrical HVACHVAC PlumbingPlumbing ExcavatorsExcavators ConcreteConcrete
  • 59. Designing for Construction SafetyDesigning for Construction Safety (DfCS) – What is it?(DfCS) – What is it?  An extension of DfS to coverAn extension of DfS to cover construction projectsconstruction projects  Recognizes construction site safetyRecognizes construction site safety as a design criterionas a design criterion  The process of addressingThe process of addressing construction site safety and health inconstruction site safety and health in the design of a projectthe design of a project
  • 60. Designing for Construction SafetyDesigning for Construction Safety ProcessProcess11 11 GambateseGambatese Planning Preliminary design/ Schematics Design Construction Operation and Maintenance Planning Review Prelim. Design Review 30% Review 90% Review 60% Review
  • 61. DfCS Examples:DfCS Examples: Prefabrication Steel stairs Concrete Wall Panels Concrete Segmented Bridge
  • 62. DfCS Examples:DfCS Examples: Anchorage Points
  • 63. DfCS Examples:DfCS Examples: RoofsRoofs Skylights Upper story windows and roof parapets
  • 64. DfCS Examples:DfCS Examples: Steell Design  Avoid hanging connections;Avoid hanging connections; design to bear on columnsdesign to bear on columns instead using safety seatsinstead using safety seats  Require holes in columns forRequire holes in columns for tie lines 21” and 42” abovetie lines 21” and 42” above each floor slabeach floor slab  Specify shop weldedSpecify shop welded connections instead of boltsconnections instead of bolts or field welds to avoidor field welds to avoid dangerous positions duringdangerous positions during erectionerection  Consider approximateConsider approximate dimensions of connectiondimensions of connection tools to prevent pinches ortools to prevent pinches or awkward assembliesawkward assembliesNational Institute of Steel Detailing and SteelNational Institute of Steel Detailing and Steel Erectors Association of America.Erectors Association of America. DetailingDetailing Guide for the Enhancement of Erection Safety.Guide for the Enhancement of Erection Safety.
  • 65. DfCS Examples: Residential FallDfCS Examples: Residential Fall ProtectionProtection
  • 66. Other DfCS Design ExamplesOther DfCS Design Examples  Design underground utilities to be placedDesign underground utilities to be placed using trenchless technologyusing trenchless technology11  Specify primers, sealers and otherSpecify primers, sealers and other coatings that do not emit noxious fumescoatings that do not emit noxious fumes or contain carcinogenic productsor contain carcinogenic products22  Design cable type lifeline system forDesign cable type lifeline system for storage towersstorage towers33 11 Weinstein, “Can Design Improve Construction Safety”, 2005Weinstein, “Can Design Improve Construction Safety”, 2005 22 Gambatese, “Viability of Designing for Construction Worker Safety”, 2005Gambatese, “Viability of Designing for Construction Worker Safety”, 2005 33 Behm, “Linking Construction Fatalities to the Design for Construction SafetyBehm, “Linking Construction Fatalities to the Design for Construction Safety Concept”, 2005Concept”, 2005
  • 67. CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR PUMPSPUMPS
  • 68. CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR PUMPSPUMPS  Replacing circulator pumps requiresReplacing circulator pumps requires a ladder,pumps are located in a tighta ladder,pumps are located in a tight space.space.  Maintenance worker could fall offMaintenance worker could fall off ladder, drop pump, or suffer handladder, drop pump, or suffer hand injury from hitting adjacent pipinginjury from hitting adjacent piping
  • 69. CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR PUMPSPUMPS Design review questions-Design review questions- Is there enough room to replace theIs there enough room to replace the pumps?pumps? How high off the ground are the pumps?How high off the ground are the pumps? What if a maintenance worker has to shutWhat if a maintenance worker has to shut off a valve an emergency?off a valve an emergency?
  • 70. CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR PUMPSPUMPS Identify Hazard-Identify Hazard- Fall and mechanicalFall and mechanical
  • 71. CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR PUMPSPUMPS Assess Risk-Assess Risk- severity- slight (knuckles) to seriousseverity- slight (knuckles) to serious (head injury)(head injury) probability-medium (likely)probability-medium (likely) risk- low to mediumrisk- low to medium Additional consideration- solution isAdditional consideration- solution is simple and inexpensivesimple and inexpensive
  • 72. CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR PUMPSPUMPS SeveritySeverity ProbabilityProbability SevereSevere SeriousSerious ModerateModerate SlightSlight HighHigh High High Medium LowHigh High Medium Low MediumMedium HighHigh Medium Low LowMedium Low Low ModerateModerate Medium Low Low NegligibleMedium Low Low Negligible LowLow Low Low Negligible NegligibleLow Low Negligible Negligible
  • 73. CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR PUMPSPUMPS DfCS solution: design pumps close toDfCS solution: design pumps close to ground level so that a ladder is notground level so that a ladder is not required, provide adequate space aroundrequired, provide adequate space around pumps, provide a metal identification tagpumps, provide a metal identification tag for each valve and provide a permanentfor each valve and provide a permanent identification board in the mechanicalidentification board in the mechanical room that identifies each valve and it’sroom that identifies each valve and it’s purpose.purpose.
  • 74. CASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATORCASE STUDY #1-CIRCULATOR PUMPSPUMPS
  • 75. CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2- INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OFINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)  HVAC System installed in the attic ofHVAC System installed in the attic of a commercial office buildinga commercial office building  No floor or platform/walkways wereNo floor or platform/walkways were designed or installeddesigned or installed  HVAC technicians had to walk onHVAC technicians had to walk on joists/trussesjoists/trusses
  • 76. CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2- INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OFINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC) Design review questionsDesign review questions What will workers stand on when installingWhat will workers stand on when installing HVAC system?HVAC system? Will regular maintenance be required?Will regular maintenance be required? What will the maintenance workers standWhat will the maintenance workers stand on?on? What are the pertinent OSHA regulations?What are the pertinent OSHA regulations?
  • 77. CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2- INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCEINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)OF HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)
  • 78. CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2- INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OFINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC) Design review questionsDesign review questions What will workers stand on when installingWhat will workers stand on when installing HVAC system?HVAC system? Will regular maintenance be required?Will regular maintenance be required? What will the maintenance workers standWhat will the maintenance workers stand on?on? What are the pertinent OSHA regulations?What are the pertinent OSHA regulations?
  • 79. CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2- INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OFINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC) Identify hazardIdentify hazard FALLFALL
  • 80. CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2- INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OFINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC) Assess Risk-Assess Risk- severity- serious (knee) to severeseverity- serious (knee) to severe (death)(death) probability-medium (likely)probability-medium (likely) risk- medium to highrisk- medium to high
  • 81. CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2- INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF HVACINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)SYSTEM (ATTIC) SeveritySeverity ProbabilityProbability SevereSevere SeriousSerious ModerateModerate SlightSlight HighHigh High High Medium LowHigh High Medium Low MediumMedium High MediumHigh Medium Low LowLow Low ModerateModerate Medium Low Low NegligibleMedium Low Low Negligible LowLow Low Low Negligible NegligibleLow Low Negligible Negligible
  • 82. CASE STUDY #2-CASE STUDY #2- INSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OFINSTALLATIONMAINTENANCE OF HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC)HVAC SYSTEM (ATTIC) DfCS solution: design permanentDfCS solution: design permanent platforms and walkways withplatforms and walkways with guardrailsguardrails
  • 83. CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY11  Plant utility worker was fatallyPlant utility worker was fatally injured while performing clean-upinjured while performing clean-up duties at a raw coal reclaim areaduties at a raw coal reclaim area  Victim either fell through a 56” x 80”Victim either fell through a 56” x 80” opening in a platform or enteredopening in a platform or entered through a coal feeder openingthrough a coal feeder opening 11 Case study courtesy of Washington Group InternationalCase study courtesy of Washington Group International
  • 84. CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY Design review questions-Design review questions- Will workers need to have access toWill workers need to have access to conveyors?conveyors? Are covers and/or guardrailsAre covers and/or guardrails provided for all openings near orprovided for all openings near or over conveyors?over conveyors? Are covers and/or guardrail gatesAre covers and/or guardrail gates interlocked?interlocked?
  • 85. CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY
  • 86. CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY Identify hazardIdentify hazard MechanicalMechanical
  • 87. CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY Assess Risk-Assess Risk- severity- severe (death)severity- severe (death) probability-medium to highprobability-medium to high risk- highrisk- high
  • 88. CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY SeveritySeverity ProbabilityProbability SevereSevere SeriousSerious ModerateModerate SlightSlight HighHigh HighHigh High Medium LowHigh Medium Low MediumMedium HighHigh Medium Low LowMedium Low Low ModerateModerate Medium Low Low NegligibleMedium Low Low Negligible LowLow Low Low Negligible NegligibleLow Low Negligible Negligible
  • 89. CASE STUDY #3-RAW COALCASE STUDY #3-RAW COAL RECLAIM FACILITYRECLAIM FACILITY DfCS solution: design covers and/orDfCS solution: design covers and/or guardrails over conveyor belts andguardrails over conveyor belts and opening to conveyor belts. Designopening to conveyor belts. Design interlocks for covers and gates.interlocks for covers and gates.
  • 90. CASE STUDY #4-BLINDCASE STUDY #4-BLIND PENETRATION INTO CONCRETEPENETRATION INTO CONCRETE11 A construction worker penetrated anA construction worker penetrated an embedded electrical conduitembedded electrical conduit containing an energized 120-volt linecontaining an energized 120-volt line while hand drilling into a concretewhile hand drilling into a concrete bean to install pipe hanger inserts.bean to install pipe hanger inserts. The conduit was 1 inch from theThe conduit was 1 inch from the surface.surface. 11 Dept. of Energy Blind Penetration IncidentsDept. of Energy Blind Penetration Incidents
  • 91. CASE STUDY #4-BLINDCASE STUDY #4-BLIND PENETRATION INTO CONCRETEPENETRATION INTO CONCRETE Design review questionsDesign review questions How will the worker install the pipeHow will the worker install the pipe hangers?hangers? Are there any electrical lines in theAre there any electrical lines in the concrete beam?concrete beam? Are there any pipe hangers that will beAre there any pipe hangers that will be near an electrical line?near an electrical line?
  • 92. CASE STUDY #4-BLINDCASE STUDY #4-BLIND PENETRATION INTO CONCRETEPENETRATION INTO CONCRETE Assess Risk-Assess Risk- severity- severe (death)severity- severe (death) probability- moderate to mediumprobability- moderate to medium risk- medium to highrisk- medium to high
  • 93. CASE STUDY #4-BLINDCASE STUDY #4-BLIND PENETRATION INTO CONCRETEPENETRATION INTO CONCRETE SeveritySeverity ProbabilityProbability SevereSevere SeriousSerious ModerateModerate SlightSlight HighHigh High High Medium LowHigh High Medium Low MediumMedium HighHigh Medium Low LowMedium Low Low ModerateModerate MediumMedium Low Low NegligibleLow Low Negligible LowLow Low Low Negligible NegligibleLow Low Negligible Negligible
  • 94. CASE STUDY #4-BLINDCASE STUDY #4-BLIND PENETRATION INTO CONCRETEPENETRATION INTO CONCRETE DfCS Solution: Design embeddedDfCS Solution: Design embedded electrical lines deeper than theelectrical lines deeper than the maximum depth of the pipe hangermaximum depth of the pipe hanger bolts, clearly mark locations ofbolts, clearly mark locations of electrical lines on contract drawingselectrical lines on contract drawings
  • 95. CASE STUDY #5-INCINERATORCASE STUDY #5-INCINERATOR CLEANOUTCLEANOUT11  An incinerator located adjacent to a main catwalk on 4An incinerator located adjacent to a main catwalk on 4thth floorfloor  There was no catwalk from the main catwalk to theThere was no catwalk from the main catwalk to the incineratorincinerator  Workers periodically had to go into incinerator to cleanWorkers periodically had to go into incinerator to clean  Workers used make shift planking to from main catwalk toWorkers used make shift planking to from main catwalk to incineratorincinerator 11 Note the catwalk from the main catwalk to the incinerator with the yellow guardrails wasNote the catwalk from the main catwalk to the incinerator with the yellow guardrails was not in place at the time the worker fell.not in place at the time the worker fell.
  • 96. CASE STUDY #5-INCINERATORCASE STUDY #5-INCINERATOR CLEANOUTCLEANOUT
  • 97. CASE STUDY #5-INCINERATORCASE STUDY #5-INCINERATOR CLEANOUTCLEANOUT
  • 98. CASE STUDY #5-INCINERATORCASE STUDY #5-INCINERATOR CLEANOUTCLEANOUT Design review questions..Design review questions.. Will regular maintenance be required?Will regular maintenance be required? How will the workers gain access to theHow will the workers gain access to the incineratorincinerator What are the pertinent OSHA regulations?What are the pertinent OSHA regulations?
  • 99. CASE STUDY #5-INCINERATORCASE STUDY #5-INCINERATOR CLEANOUTCLEANOUT Identify hazardIdentify hazard FALLFALL
  • 100. CASE STUDY #5-INCINERATORCASE STUDY #5-INCINERATOR CLEANOUTCLEANOUT Assess Risk-Assess Risk- severity- severe (death)severity- severe (death) probability-medium (likely) to highprobability-medium (likely) to high (very likely)(very likely) risk- highrisk- high
  • 101. CASE STUDY #-INCINERATOR CLEANOUTCASE STUDY #-INCINERATOR CLEANOUT SeveritySeverity ProbabilityProbability SevereSevere SeriousSerious ModerateModerate SlightSlight HighHigh HighHigh High Medium LowHigh Medium Low MediumMedium HighHigh Medium Low LowMedium Low Low ModerateModerate Medium Low Low NegligibleMedium Low Low Negligible LowLow Low Low Negligible NegligibleLow Low Negligible Negligible
  • 102. CASE STUDY #5-INCINERATORCASE STUDY #5-INCINERATOR CLEANOUTCLEANOUT DfCS solution: design catwalk withDfCS solution: design catwalk with guardrail and toeboards from mainguardrail and toeboards from main catwalk to incinerator.catwalk to incinerator.
  • 103. IDEAS FOR DESIGNERSIDEAS FOR DESIGNERS www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org Case StudiesCase Studies  Trimming tops of Concrete PilesTrimming tops of Concrete Piles  Modular Construction and Installation ofModular Construction and Installation of ServicesServices  Temporary Support Steelwork for HighTemporary Support Steelwork for High Level Work PlatformLevel Work Platform  Atrium LightingAtrium Lighting  Integrated Service Column / Panel DesignIntegrated Service Column / Panel Design  Prefabrication of SteelworkPrefabrication of Steelwork  Modular Construction of Stone PanelsModular Construction of Stone Panels
  • 104. TRAILER ACCESS PLATFORMSTRAILER ACCESS PLATFORMS11 11 www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
  • 105. CAST-IN SOCKETS FORCAST-IN SOCKETS FOR RAILINGSRAILINGS11 11 www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
  • 106. COLOR CODED BOLT BAGSCOLOR CODED BOLT BAGS11 11 www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
  • 107. SAFETY BARRIER TO LOADSAFETY BARRIER TO LOAD PALLETS ONTO MEZZANINEPALLETS ONTO MEZZANINE11 11 www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
  • 109. MAINTENANCE LIFT TO ACCESSMAINTENANCE LIFT TO ACCESS ATRIUM LIGHTINGATRIUM LIGHTING11 11 www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
  • 110. MODULAR SERVICE RISERSMODULAR SERVICE RISERS11 11 www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
  • 111. GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org  Hazardous materialsHazardous materials  AsbestosAsbestos  Musculo-SkeletalMusculo-Skeletal  NoiseNoise  ExcavationsExcavations  Erection of StructuresErection of Structures  SteelworkSteelwork
  • 112. GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org  RefurbishmentRefurbishment  Temporary work equipmentTemporary work equipment  Work at heightWork at height  RoofsRoofs  Spatial DesignsSpatial Designs  Suspended Access EquipmentSuspended Access Equipment  BlockworkBlockwork
  • 113. GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org  DemolitionDemolition  Manual HandlingManual Handling  Lifting-cranesLifting-cranes
  • 114.
  • 115.
  • 116. GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS T 20.008 Work at HeightT 20.008 Work at Height11  Design service runs for so that they can beDesign service runs for so that they can be maintained from floor abovemaintained from floor above  Pre-assembly and fitting of trussesPre-assembly and fitting of trusses  Position splices for steel columns so thePosition splices for steel columns so the splices can be done from a finished floorsplices can be done from a finished floor  Install stairways early to avoid the needInstall stairways early to avoid the need for temporary accessfor temporary access  Locate service equipment on ground ifLocate service equipment on ground if possiblepossible 11 www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
  • 117. GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS T 20.002 Erecting SteelworkT 20.002 Erecting Steelwork11  Check all steel members for erection loadsCheck all steel members for erection loads  Ensure that all slender members can resistEnsure that all slender members can resist compression imposed by lifting slingscompression imposed by lifting slings  Maximize pre-fabricationMaximize pre-fabrication  Ensure the spacing of purlins allows forEnsure the spacing of purlins allows for the largest component to lowered downthe largest component to lowered down throughthrough 11 www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
  • 118. GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS T 20.009 RoofsT 20.009 Roofs11  Provide anchors points for fallProvide anchors points for fall protectionprotection  Ensure roof structure can handleEnsure roof structure can handle stacks of materialsstacks of materials  Position gutters so that cleaning canPosition gutters so that cleaning can be done from cherry pickers or frombe done from cherry pickers or from safe access routessafe access routes  Consider parapetsConsider parapets 11 www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
  • 119. GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS H 20.002 NOISEH 20.002 NOISE11  Cast in crack inducers rather thanCast in crack inducers rather than saw cuttingsaw cutting  Cast in anchors rather than siteCast in anchors rather than site drillingdrilling  Avoid vibro-compaction of groundAvoid vibro-compaction of ground  Keep site grinding, cutting, etc. to aKeep site grinding, cutting, etc. to a minimumminimum 11 www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
  • 120. GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS H 20.001Musculo-skeletalH 20.001Musculo-skeletal11  Provide adequate space for liftingProvide adequate space for lifting machinesmachines  Design for machine laying of paversDesign for machine laying of pavers  Design brick laying to reduce longDesign brick laying to reduce long duration repetitionduration repetition 11 www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
  • 121. GUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERSGUIDANCE FOR DESIGNERS H 10.001 Hazardous MaterialsH 10.001 Hazardous Materials11  Cast in chases for services ratherCast in chases for services rather than cut to reduce dustthan cut to reduce dust  Specify water base or solvent freeSpecify water base or solvent free paintspaints  Check to see if there any existingCheck to see if there any existing contaminants on the site, alertcontaminants on the site, alert workersworkers 11 www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org
  • 122. Summary/ClosingSummary/Closing  Introduce the DfCS ProcessIntroduce the DfCS Process  Basic Safety EngineeringBasic Safety Engineering  Design FeaturesDesign Features  Case Studies to Illustrate ProcessCase Studies to Illustrate Process
  • 123. Summary/ClosingSummary/Closing DESIGNERS CAN HAVE ADESIGNERS CAN HAVE A POSITIVE IMPACT ONPOSITIVE IMPACT ON REDUCING CONSTRUCTIONREDUCING CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENTSACCIDENTS
  • 124. DfCS Tools/ResourcesDfCS Tools/Resources  Construction Industry Institute databaseConstruction Industry Institute database • www.construction-institute.org/scriptcontent/more/rwww.construction-institute.org/scriptcontent/more/rr  United Kingdom Health & Safety ExecutiveUnited Kingdom Health & Safety Executive designer guidesdesigner guides • www.hse.gov.uk/construction/designers/index.htwww.hse.gov.uk/construction/designers/index.ht mm  CHAIRCHAIR • www.workcover.nsw.gov.au/Publications/OHS/Safwww.workcover.nsw.gov.au/Publications/OHS/Saf etyGuides/chairsafetyindesigntool.htmetyGuides/chairsafetyindesigntool.htm  OSHA WebsiteOSHA Website • www.osha.govwww.osha.gov
  • 125. DfCS Tools/ResourcesDfCS Tools/Resources  Inherently Safer Design Principles forInherently Safer Design Principles for Construction, The Hazard InformationConstruction, The Hazard Information Foundation, Inc.Foundation, Inc. besafe@hazardinfo.combesafe@hazardinfo.com  www.safetyindesign.orgwww.safetyindesign.org

Editor's Notes

  1. Early slide with compelling photos of elevated tasks and trenches and other dangerous conditions to get the audience’s attention. Better photo of tilt up wall panel and photo of prefabricated plumbing tree instead of steel stairs (Jack Donovan to send) on DfCS prefabrication example slide. Photo of permanent anchorage point on roof (John Mazourik) and cad drawing showing anchorage point locations (walter jones). This presentation introduces the design for construction safety concept and demonstrates why it is important as one piece of a holistic approach to enhancing construction site safety. The presentation was developed by the Design for Construction Safety workgroup within the OSHA Alliance Program Construction Roundtable. The Roundtable is a collection of non-profit professional organizations and individual companies who are participating in the Alliance Program.
  2. Designing for Construction Safety is the process of of addressing construction site safety and maintenance in the design phase of a project. The cusomary role of the design professional is protect the safety of the public and to comply with building codes. Designing for Construction Safety extends this role to include construction site safety.
  3. There are currently no requirements for construction safety in modern building codes. The only buiding code construction safety requirement that currently exists addresses protection of the public. pedestrian safety during cons
  4. The invovlement of design professionals in the construction process is not a new idea. There are currently many sections in the OSHA 1926 standards which require engineering controls in construction projects.
  5. This is one of the DfCS process models. Safety expectations are addressed in the beginning. There is trade contractor, QA, QC, owner, and contractor involvement throughout the design process. There are multiple reviews and re-designs. This all occurs before the drawings are finally issued for construction. This graphic depicts the typical DfCS process. The key component of this process is the incorporation of site safety knowledge into design decisions. Ideally, site safety would be considered throughout the design process. It is recognized, however, that a limited number of progress reviews for safety may be more practical. The required site safety knowledge can be provided by one or more possible sources of such safety constructability expertise, including trade contractors, an in-house employee, or an outside consultant. In the future, perhaps state and federal OSHA employees may provide such expertise. One question that sometimes is raised is whether the work product of a DfCS project looks different from that on standard projects. For now, the answer is “no.” That is, drawings and technical specifications on DfCS projects will likely at least initially look the same as typical documents, but they will reflect an inherently safer construction process. Eventually, it is hoped that construction documents resulting from a DfCS process will include safety enhancing details and notes that are not currently found on standard plans and specifications.
  6. Unfortunately, as many of us know, construction is one of the most dangerous industries to work in. In the U.S., construction typically accounts for just under 200,000 serious injuries and 1200 deaths each year. The fatality rate is disproportionally high for the size of the construction workforce. But statistics like these do not tell the whole story. Behind every serious injury, there is a real story of an individual who suffered serious pain and may never fully recover. Behind every fatality, there are spouses, children and parents who grieve every day for their loss. Because we all recognize that safety is an inherently dangerous business, all of us—including architects and engineers--must do what we can to reduce the risk of injuries on the projects we are involved in.
  7. Note to presenter. You may or may not want to include this slide…. This slide indicates what this is all about., Behind every death or serious injury is a real live person. Many design decisions have a direct effect on construction accidents. Because we all recognize that safety is an inherently dangerous business, all of us—including architects and engineers--must do what we can to reduce the risk of injuries on the projects we are involved in.
  8. These are some of the construction fatailties based on occupation. As you can see, the oridinary consruction laborer has the highest fatility rate.
  9. These are some of the most frequently cited OSHA violations in construction.
  10. One of the reasons that the DfCS concept is so compelling is that all safety professionals know that it is much more effective to design safety into a process than it is to try to manage safety within a process that is inherently unsafe. This chart has been adapted from the construction management literature. The ability to influence safety is on the vertical axis and the project schedule is on the horizontal axis. The chart shows that by including construction site safety as a consideration (along with production, quality, project scope, etc.) early in the project’s life cycle, one has a greater ability to positively influence construction site safety. This concept is in contrast to the prevailing methods of planning for construction site safety, which do not begin until a short time before the construction phase, when the ability to influence safety is limited.
  11. Studies have shown that design professionals can have significatn influence on construction safety. These are some statistics from the US and Europe Because we all recognize that safety is an inherently dangerous business, all of us—including architects and engineers--must do what we can to reduce the risk of injuries on the projects we are involved in.
  12. The idea that decisions by design professionals do influence jobsite safety is not an unproven concept. Various researchers have show that design can influence construction site safety, both positively and negatively. For example, a 1996 paper by Professor John Smallwood showed that 50% of general contractors interviewed identified poor design features as affecting safety. A European study published in 1991 found that 60% of accidents studied could have been eliminated or reduced with more thought during design (European Foundation 1991). Researchers in the UK found that design changes would have reduced likelihood of 47% of 100 construction accidents studied (Gibb et al 2004). In the U.S., Professor Mike Behm found that design was linked to accidents in approximately 22% of 226 injury incidents in OR, WA and CA and to 42% of 224 fatality incidents between 1990 and 2003 (Behm 2004).
  13. These are some simple examples of how designers can influence construction safety. Specifying guards over skylights prevents workers from falling through. Design window sills and roof parapets at a specified height eliminates the need for fall protection. One example is including a parapet roof that is at 1.0 m (39 in.) high. Such roofs serve eliminate the need for additional guardrails during roofing and rooftop HVAC appliance installation and prevent the need for fall protection during future maintenance. Another example is designing upper story windows to be at least 1.0 m (39 in.) above the floor level. Having the window sill at this height allows it to function as a guardrail during construction. Skylights are another example. Specifically, designers can: Design permanent guardrails to be installed around skylights. Design domed, rather than flat, skylights with shatterproof glass or strengthening wires. Design the skylight to be installed on a raised curb.
  14. Designers may not be familiar or have training fo identify construction safety hazards and have the skills to specify design features to eiliminate these hazrards
  15. Many design engineers are not trained in safety engineering or may not be aware of the resources that are available to designers
  16. Designing for construction safety (hereafter referred to as DfCS) represents a change from custom and practice whereby the design professional (that is, architects and/or engineers), and typically the project owner (that is, the client), become involved in facilitating construction site safety at the earliest stages of a project’s life cycle. DfCS is defined as the deliberate consideration of construction site safety in the design phase of a construction project. Many of you may be familiar with the term constructability, which usually refers to the idea of incorporating construction expertise into the design process to ensure the design is cost effective and buildable. Designing for construction safety can be viewed as ensuring the constructability review includes the safety aspects of the project. It is important to note that the designing for construction safety concept applies only to the design of the permanent facility, that is, to the aspects of the completed building that make a project inherently safer to build. The designing for construction safety initiative does not focus on how to make different methods of construction engineering safer. For example, it does not focus on how to use fall protection systems, but it does include consideration of design decisions that influence how often fall protection will be needed. Similarly, DfCS does not address how to erect safe scaffolding, but it does relate to design decisions that influence the location and type of scaffolding needed to accomplish the work. Design professionals (i.e. architects and design engineers) are in a position for decision-making and influencing to help improve construction safety in these and many other areas. For example, when the height of parapet walls is designed to be 42”, the parapet acts as a guardrail and enhances safety. When designed into the permanent structure of the building and sequenced early in construction, the parapet at this height acts to enhance safety during initial construction activities and also during subsequent maintenance and construction activities, such as roof repair. Without this consideration, constructors are solely responsible to design, prepare, and implement other temporary safety measures even if the design hinders the ease in which they are utilized.
  17. A hazard is the potential to do harm or damage. Risk is trhe product of the probability and the severity. A low probablity and a high severity can have the same risk as a high probability and a low severity It is important to note that the designing for construction safety concept applies only to the design of the permanent facility, that is, to the aspects of the completed building that make a project inherently safer to build. The designing for construction safety initiative does not focus on how to make different methods of construction engineering safer. For example, it does not focus on how to use fall protection systems, but it does include consideration of design decisions that influence how often fall protection will be needed. Similarly, DfCS does not address how to erect safe scaffolding, but it does relate to design decisions that influence the location and type of scaffolding needed to accomplish the work. Design professionals (i.e. architects and design engineers) are in a position for decision-making and influencing to help improve construction safety in these and many other areas. For example, when the height of parapet walls is designed to be 42”, the parapet acts as a guardrail and enhances safety. When designed into the permanent structure of the building and sequenced early in construction, the parapet at this height acts to enhance safety during initial construction activities and also during subsequent maintenance and construction activities, such as roof repair. Without this consideration, constructors are solely responsible to design, prepare, and implement other temporary safety measures even if the design hinders the ease in which they are utilized.
  18. There are many recognized hazards. Any process that involves gravity can create a hazard.
  19. There are many hazards which are well-known such as tripping, slipping and mechancial hazards.These hazards are fairly easy to identify. For example, when the height of parapet walls is designed to be 42”, the parapet acts as a guardrail and enhances safety. When designed into the permanent structure of the building and sequenced early in construction, the parapet at this height acts to enhance safety during initial construction activities and also during subsequent maintenance and construction activities, such as roof repair. Without this consideration, constructors are solely responsible to design, prepare, and implement other temporary safety measures even if the design hinders the ease in which they are utilized.
  20. Anything that stores energy should be checked for a possible hazard as well as electrical and chemical sources It is important to note that the designing for construction safety concept applies only to the design of the permanent facility, that is, to the aspects of the completed building that make a project inherently safer to build. The designing for construction safety initiative does not focus on how to make different methods of construction engineering safer. For example, it does not focus on how to use fall protection systems, but it does include consideration of design decisions that influence how often fall protection will be needed. Similarly, DfCS does not address how to erect safe scaffolding, but it does relate to design decisions that influence the location and type of scaffolding needed to accomplish the work. Design professionals (i.e. architects and design engineers) are in a position for decision-making and influencing to help improve construction safety in these and many other areas. For example, when the height of parapet walls is designed to be 42”, the parapet acts as a guardrail and enhances safety. When designed into the permanent structure of the building and sequenced early in construction, the parapet at this height acts to enhance safety during initial construction activities and also during subsequent maintenance and construction activities, such as roof repair. Without this consideration, constructors are solely responsible to design, prepare, and implement other temporary safety measures even if the design hinders the ease in which they are utilized.
  21. Biological and chemical agent as well as all forms of radiant energy are potential hazard sources For example, when the height of parapet walls is designed to be 42”, the parapet acts as a guardrail and enhances safety. When designed into the permanent structure of the building and sequenced early in construction, the parapet at this height acts to enhance safety during initial construction activities and also during subsequent maintenance and construction activities, such as roof repair. Without this consideration, constructors are solely responsible to design, prepare, and implement other temporary safety measures even if the design hinders the ease in which they are utilized.
  22. There are many standards which the design professional can use to identify hazards and provide safety measures. ANSI is a family of standards that can be used for this purpose. This is only a brief listing of some of the relevant ANSI standards.
  23. ASTM is another family of standards that can provide guidance for recognized hazards.
  24. NFPA is another organization that can provide guidance on recognized hazards. This is only a brief list of applicable NFPA standards.
  25. Government regulations such as OSHA can be used by the design professional to identify and eiliminate hazads
  26. There are many government agencies and standard writing organizations that can be used to design out hazards
  27. This is an example of a classic fall hazard. The worker is exposed to an unprotected edge. The designer could specify anchorage points in the design so that the worker will have a tie off for fall protection. It should be noted that Designing for Construction Safety is not how or when to use fall protection, it is designing buildings so that either fall protection is not needed, or, installed hardware such as tie-offs.
  28. Confined spaces are another recognized hazard. Designer can be heloful by designing areas that do not require confined space entry procesures. It should be noted that Design for Construction Safety is how to implement a confined space entry procedure, it is how to design projects so that confined space entry is not required.
  29. This is another example where the design professional can eliminate hazards in the design stage of a project. Here is a DfCS example that involves sitework rather than an actual structure. This photo is associated with a site on which a construction worker was killed (electrocuted) when the drill rig he was operating got too close to the overhead power lines. The project environmental engineer specified that groundwater monitoring wells were to be dug directly under the power lines. If the construction safety were considered in the design phase, the engineer would have either a) specified that the wells be dug in another position away from the overhead power lines, and/or b) informed the construction company through the plans, specifications, and bid documents of the hazard and provided the necessary contact information such that the construction company could have contacted the power company prior to arriving on site. Clearly, the constructor had a responsibility for his employee and the design for construction safety concept in no way suggests that employers do not have primary responsibility for the safety of their employees. But this case illustrates that simply considering the safety of site workers during the design phase can result in easy decisions that have a major influence on a project’s inherent level of risk.
  30. There are many hazards that may be hidden. They are not readily apparent to the worker or the designer.
  31. There are several analytical techniques that can be used to uncover “hidden hazards”. These include “What If” scenarios. Other methods include assembling an experienced team of professionals to review a project. Gathering as much information as possible about a project can also aid in uncovering hazards.
  32. In a “what if” analysis the design professional or design team needs to brainstorm things that can go wrong (“what if”).
  33. This is a sample of “what if” questions that might be included in the construction highway project. Each of the “what if” scenarios should be followed up by a design feature that can eliminate the hazard.
  34. There are many other techniques and sources that can be used to identify hidden hazards.
  35. The OSHA website has a catalog of “fatal facts” . These can be reviewed to become familiar with some of the things that occur in construction. Many of these might be called “Murphy’s Law”.
  36. Designing for construction safety (hereafter referred to as DfCS) represents a change from custom and practice whereby the design professional (that is, architects and/or engineers), and typically the project owner (that is, the client), become involved in facilitating construction site safety at the earliest stages of a project’s life cycle. DfCS is defined as the deliberate consideration of construction site safety in the design phase of a construction project. Many of you may be familiar with the term constructability, which usually refers to the idea of incorporating construction expertise into the design process to ensure the design is cost effective and buildable. Designing for construction safety can be viewed as ensuring the constructability review includes the safety aspects of the project. It is important to note that the designing for construction safety concept applies only to the design of the permanent facility, that is, to the aspects of the completed building that make a project inherently safer to build. The designing for construction safety initiative does not focus on how to make different methods of construction engineering safer. For example, it does not focus on how to use fall protection systems, but it does include consideration of design decisions that influence how often fall protection will be needed. Similarly, DfCS does not address how to erect safe scaffolding, but it does relate to design decisions that influence the location and type of scaffolding needed to accomplish the work. Design professionals (i.e. architects and design engineers) are in a position for decision-making and influencing to help improve construction safety in these and many other areas. For example, when the height of parapet walls is designed to be 42”, the parapet acts as a guardrail and enhances safety. When designed into the permanent structure of the building and sequenced early in construction, the parapet at this height acts to enhance safety during initial construction activities and also during subsequent maintenance and construction activities, such as roof repair. Without this consideration, constructors are solely responsible to design, prepare, and implement other temporary safety measures even if the design hinders the ease in which they are utilized.
  37. Designing for Safety involves identifying the hazards, assessing the risk, then proposing design features to eliminate the risk or reduce it to an acceptible level. Design for Saety in used in the design of machines, equipment, products, and facilities. Many design professionals have no formal training in safety and risk assessment.
  38. The first step is to assess the risk.A very simple risk assessment is a qualitative analysis as follows. First, the injury severity is assesed, severe, serious, moderate or slight
  39. Next the probability of occurranace is estimated, either high, medium, moderate or low.
  40. Once the severity and the probality have been estimated, this matrix can be used to assess the risk. The risk ranges from high to negligable. Design action ranges from intervention (high) to no action (negligable).
  41. There are other methods of hazard identification and prevention that can be used. This matrix was developed by the Hazard Information Foundation
  42. Once the risk has been determined, the design professional proceeds to eliminate the risk or reduce it to an acceptible level by the design alternatives, designing out the hazard being the top priority, followed by providing safety devices, warning devices, operating procedures and training, and lastly providing personal protective equipment.
  43. This ends the protion of this course that deals with safety engineering. The treatment here was an overview/introduction. The field of safety engineeing is much more broad and complicated than can be presented in this brief course. The reader is referred to the American Society of Safety Engineers, the National Safety Council, and the Board of Certified Safety Professionals for more information.
  44. Now getting back to the main subject, that is how designers can prevent or reduce construction accidents. Construction is unique from other industries. For example, in general industry, the designers, assembly workers, management, and owners are generally all under one roof and all work for the same entity. There is generally more of a chain of command, responsibilities are more defined. This is not true in construction. An owner may purchase plans from a design professional. The owner may then contract with a general contractor, construction manager, or other agent. Any of these entities may sub-contract out work. The safety responsibilities become blurred. Some contractors may pass safety responsibilities onto others. No one follows up.
  45. The result is that no decisions or poor decisions are made with regard to safety and someone gets injured or even killed. These are some of the root causes for construction accidents. Many of these causes are related to human error, but could have been prevented if a design feature would have eliminated the need for a site decision.
  46. These are some of the areas where a design professional needs to be concerned about.
  47. These are some of the trades that are involved in a construction project.
  48. Designing for Construction Safety is an extension of the Design for Safety process (Hazard identification/hazard elimination/design hierarchy) to construcion. Construction safety becomes a design criteria.
  49. This is another model of how the design for safety process fits in construction. The design process becomes part of the planning, rather than a task that ends when the plan are delivered .
  50. Here are some examples. Prefabrication eliminates site work that can lead to accidents
  51. The idea of identifying anchorage points on construction drawings is in accordance with Appendix C to Subpart M (Fall Protection) from the federal OSHA standards for Construction: (h) Tie-off considerations (1) “One of the most important aspects of personal fall protection systems is fully planning the system before it is put into use. Probably the most overlooked component is planning for suitable anchorage points. Such planning should ideally be done before the structure or building is constructed so that anchorage points can be incorporated during construction for use later for window cleaning or other building maintenance. If properly planned, these anchorage points may be used during construction, as well as afterwards.” Designing in anchorage points gives workers someplace to tie off on, rather than picking something that may not be structurally sound.
  52. Many fall accidents occur in residential construction. By designing and installing tie-offs, roofers and cosntruction workers have something to tie off on when working on a residential roof.
  53. This is a very simple example that illustrates the concept. In this boiler room, the circulator pumps where high up near the ceiling. A worker would have to stand on a ladder to replace the pumps, and would have to work in between the other piping.
  54. These are some of the “what if” questions that can be asked
  55. First we identify the hazard(s).The hazards are FALL (off the ladder) and MECHANICAL (cracking your knuckles in the tight space)
  56. Next we assess the risk. The severity can be serious, a head injury from a fall. The probability is medium, it is likely to occur. The risk using the matrix is low to medium. It should be noted that the design feature in this case is simple and inexpensive
  57. Once the severity and the probality have been estimated, this matrix can be used to assess the risk. The risk ranges from high to negligable. Design action ranges from intervention (high) to no action (negligable).
  58. In this case the solution to eliminate the hazard was to place the pumps low enough so that a ladder would not be needed, and to put them in an area that was clear of other piping. This simple example shows how a designer can have an impact on construction safety without increasing cost, taking on additional liability, or involving the owner.
  59. This is another case study that illustrates the Design for Construction Safety concept. An HVAC system was installed in the attic of a commercial office building. No floor or platform walkways were installed. HVAC technicians had to walk on the trusses to install the system and to maintain the system
  60. Trying to walk on the joists was made more difficult when insulation was blown in. There was some narrow planking sent down, but it was not wide enough and was not secured.
  61. Once the severity and the probality have been estimated, this matrix can be used to assess the risk. The risk ranges from high to negligable. Design action ranges from intervention (high) to no action (negligable).
  62. In this case the hazard was recongnizable and the design solution straight forward, right out of the OSHA regulations
  63. Here is another case study, coutesy of the Washington Group International
  64. This the area were the worker fell
  65. Once the severity and the probality have been estimated, this matrix can be used to assess the risk. The risk ranges from high to negligable. Design action ranges from intervention (high) to no action (negligable).
  66. This is an example of a hidden hazard
  67. This is an example where “what if” scenarios can be used to “flush out” the hazard.
  68. Once the severity and the probality have been estimated, this matrix can be used to assess the risk. The risk ranges from high to negligable. Design action ranges from intervention (high) to no action (negligable).
  69. Even with this hidden hazard, there are design decisions that can be made to eliminate or reduce the risk of an injury.
  70. This is another case study that illustrates the Design for Construction Safety concept. An HVAC system was installed in the attic of a commercial office building. No floor or platform walkways were installed. HVAC technicians had to walk on the trusses to install the system and to maintain the system
  71. This is a very simple example that illustrates the concept. In this boiler room, the circulator pumps where high up near the ceiling. A worker would have to stand on a ladder to replace the pumps, and would have to work in between the other piping.
  72. This is a very simple example that illustrates the concept. In this boiler room, the circulator pumps where high up near the ceiling. A worker would have to stand on a ladder to replace the pumps, and would have to work in between the other piping.
  73. Once the severity and the probality have been estimated, this matrix can be used to assess the risk. The risk ranges from high to negligable. Design action ranges from intervention (high) to no action (negligable).