1. Student Details :
Name : Chauhan Parth Ashokkumar
Branch : Electronics & Communication
Enrollment No. : 100170111086
Semester : 7th
E-mail : chauhanparth2013@gmail.com
Project : 1(No.4)

2. Project Goal
To recognize “Static identities” and
“Dynamic identities” in people around
me(people I know and meet day in and
day out).

3. Defination :
A static identity is one that does not undergo change and remaining the same at the
end as he or she at beginning.
Static identity is based on
- Qualification and Awards
- power and Position
- Past Achievement
- Knowledge Gained
A Dynamic Identity is one that does undergo an important change. Here, changes in
some Sense within the character like changes in understanding , changes in
commitment , Changes in values.
Dynamic identity is based on
- The difference I can make to the world
- The responsibilities I carry
- my future potential for contribution
- My willingness to learn and grow

4. DIFFERENCE between Static and
Dynamic identities
Static Identities
•Present his self with his
Qualification
•Make the show of his “Power &
Position”
•Believes in his Past Achievement
•Always takes pride of being
“Knowledge gained”
Dynamic Identities
•Has capability to make a
positive difference
•Focuses on “Responsibility”
•Believes in future potential
•Willingness to be a learner

5. Observation case of 3 persons (X, Y, Z)
• Mr. X is a Professor in a college.
• Mr. Y is a Chief Engineer .
• Mr. Z is an Assistant Engineer in an organization.
• In which,
• Mr. X has Dynamic identities.
• Mr. Y has Static identities.
• Mr. Z has Combo of Dynamic & Static identities.

6. • Mr. X is a Professor in a
college.
• M.E. in Circuit & Networking, yet
never makes Show of for his
Qualification.
• Though being a part of Government
Education System, never runs away
from his Responsibilities towards
students.
• Always eager to utilize his
knowledge for new creation.
• Very frank to every students & staff
members, encourages them for their
work.
• Eveready to learn from anyone.

7. • Mr. Y is a Chief Engineer .
• Got his job after convincing for his Shining Star Results in
college.
• For a failure of some pending work or fault, he blames his junior
employee. Thus runs away from his Responsibilities.
• He has limited his knowledge for a specific task given to be
completed by organization. Never thinks to bring some useful
change.
• Not much frank to his subordinates & often gets angry for their
fault.
• Thinks that he has every kind of knowledge more than his
juniors.

8. • Mr. Z is an Engineer in
an organization.
• Got his job with his result as
well as his knowledge in
appropriate field.
• Performs his work on time
with interest, but has no
interest in anything else.
• He gained enough knowledge
for a job he has been given.
• Frank to only those
subordinates who are his
friends.

9. Conclusion
The Contributor’s image of self is not defined by the
qualifications and achievements, not by power and position ,
not by his/her glories rather, he/she thinks of oneself as
someone who has the capability to make a positive difference
in the world , focuses on the responsibility, sees oneself in
terms of his/her future potential – what he/she can accomplish
in the future ,sees oneself as a learner.