4. Contents
Our Vision 5
Summary of Recommendations 6
Food Security in Africa 7
Building Resilience 11
Our Recommendations
Resilient Markets 15
Resilient Agriculture 19
Resilient People 23
Political Leadership for Resilient Growth 26
Conclusion 28
Key References 29
4
5. Our Vision
We, the members of the Montpellier Panel, believe investment in resilient
agricultural growth in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) can achieve sustainable food
and nutrition security for the continent and significantly contribute to the
African and global economy.
As we argued in our 2010 report:
• Food security underpins global security;
• Food trade is central to global trade; and
• Agricultural development is the best route to achieving economic growth
that reaches the rural poor and most vulnerable in low income countries.
As is also evident from the experience of recent years, failure to ensure
universal food security threatens political stability, social welfare and economic
growth. Inclusive, resilient agricultural growth is thus a political imperative.
Resilient agricultural growth doesn’t happen by itself - it needs pro-active
policy design and investment.
The challenge is to generate agricultural growth that produces enough food,
ensures it is accessible to all, is inclusive of the most vulnerable and is resilient,
and hence able to withstand the increasing multiple stresses and shocks that
afflict the world.
To this end, we believe the priority should be supporting the creation of:
• Resilient markets that enable farmers to increase production and generate
income through innovation and taking risks, while ensuring food is available
at an affordable price.
• Resilient agriculture that creates agricultural growth out of knowledge
and innovation, while simultaneously building the capacity of smallholder
farmers to counter environmental degradation and climate change.
• Resilient people who are able to generate diverse livelihoods that provide
stable incomes, adequate nutrition and good health in the face of recurrent
stresses and shocks.
To achieve these goals we will also need political leadership that demonstrates
the necessary vision and will.
5
6. Summary of Recommendations
The recommendations in this report are aimed at governments, both European donors and African
governments, working in partnership with local and international private sector actors, NGOs
and civil society organisations (CSOs). Figure 1 shows an outline of these recommendations.
Reduce food price volatility
Facilitate private investment Resilient Markets
Build enabling environments
Political Will
Enable resilient and sustainable
intensification
Resilient Agriculture
Growth with
Combat land and water
degradation Resilience
Build climate smart agriculture
Scale up nutrition
Focus on rural women and Resilient People
youth
Build diverse livelihoods
Figure 1. Flowchart of the Montpellier Panel recommendations on how to achieve agricultural growth
with resilience
6
9. Table 1 - SWOT analysis for African agriculture
Strengths: Weaknesses:
• The diversity of African agricultural • A lack of coherent, cross-ministerial policies
agroecosystems furnishes resilience although and leadership on agriculture
this heterogeneity also requires sophisticated • Poor incentives for small business investment
and nuanced management • Access to input and output markets is often
• Smallholder agriculture can be highly efficient, weak
producing five or more tons of grain per hectare • Average cereal yields are only one ton per
with appropriate inputs and management hectare
• Farm-level production costs in Africa are often • The predominant rainfed agriculture is
relatively low vulnerable to unreliable and unpredictable
• There is a strong tradition of village-level rainfall
farmer associations providing a basis for growth • Total agricultural R&D spending in Africa
and innovation grew at only 1.9% between 2000 and 2008,
• Acceleration in GDP growth in SSA has been, in although there is wide variability between
part, driven by faster agricultural growth countries
• More organized and concerted African • African soils are heavily degraded and
leadership through CAADP depleted of nutrients
• Foreign direct investment (FDI) in the continent • Tenure over more than 90% of land remains
increased from US$2.4 billion in 1985 to US$55 outside the formal legal system in Africa and
billion in 2010 although most of this was in the is therefore at risk of dispossession.
oil and gas sectors • Agricultural mechanisation is poorly
developed
Opportunities: Threats:
• There is a large agricultural workforce: 65% • 80% of all African farms (33 million farms)
of Africa’s population lives and works in rural are less than two hectares in size, which can
areas increase transaction costs
• The workforce will be predominantly young: by • The success of investments in agriculture
2040, one in five of the world’s young people depends on the engagement of women who
will live in Africa make up 50% of the agricultural labour force
• Large opportunities to improve yields through and have relatively poor access to resources
increasing fertilizer application rates and and services
irrigating more land • SSA has many pests, diseases and weeds
• Fertilisers are applied at average rates of about such as Striga, Black Sigatoka, Banana wilt,
11kg/ ha of arable land (compared to 154kg Cassava mosaic virus, Maize leaf streak,
ha in India and 468kg/ha in China). There is a Maruca beetles, stem borers, downy mildew
huge potential to use local African sources of and locusts that are capable of destroying
rock phosphate fertilizer at affordable costs harvests
• Only around 4% of cultivated land in SSA is • SSA farmers face the lowest agricultural
irrigated. Potentially over 20 million hectares incentives in the world
of land under irrigation • Three quarters of African countries are net
• Already in motion are agricultural growth importers of agricultural products and African
corridor projects in areas with high agricultural trade tariffs are on average 50% higher than
potential that will stimulate investment and comparable tariffs in Latin America and Asia
develop regional value chains • Climate change is likely to reduce crop yields
• Mobile and internet connectivity is growing across much of SSA
rapidly: mobile phone subscribers have risen
from less than two million in 1998 to over
400 million in 2009 and internet users in SSA
between 2005 and 2010 grew by almost 430%
9
10. Burkina Faso Algeria
Cameroon Angola
Cape Verde Benin
Central African Rep. Botswana
Ethiopia Burundi
Guinea Egypt Equatorial Guinea
Kenya Ghana Gambia, The
Lesotho Mauritania Guinea Bissau
Malawi Mozambique
Mali Namibia
Morocco Sao Tome & Principe
Senegal Tunisia
Swaziland
Uganda
Countries on track for
Countries on track for
Countries on track for achieving MDG1 halving hunger by 2015
halving poverty by 2015
Figure 3: Countries on track for achieving MDG1 based on ‘business as usual’ projections.
Source: ReSAKSS based on World Bank 2009, UN 2009.
Leadership from CAADP
As we recorded in our 2010 report, there has • 20 of the countries have moved on to develop their
been a step change in the way African leaders, agricultural investment plans and are receiving
African regions and African governments approach donor funds including five who have been awarded
agriculture. Since 2003, the African Union’s GAFSP (The Global Agriculture and Food Security
Comprehensive Africa Agricultural Development Program) funding, totalling US$223.5 million.
Programme (CAADP), has provided an official channel
for developing regional and national agricultural • CAADP has set the goals of allocating 10% of
sector policies, strategies, and investment national budgets to the agricultural sector and
programs. Its momentum has been growing: achieving a 6% national agricultural growth rate.
• 29 countries have completed the CAADP • Seven countries are currently meeting the 10%
Roundtable process and signed strategy agriculture spending target. These countries
documents, known as ‘compacts’. met it both in the most recent single year
measured, and on average over the most recent
period (2003-09). Of the countries for which data
was available, 17 countries met or surpassed
the target of 6% agriculture growth in 2009.
10
11. Building Resilience
What do we mean by growth
with resilience?
Resilience, in the context of this report, is the capacity Stress or shock
of agricultural development to withstand or recover
from stresses and shocks and thus bounce back to the
Development
previous level of growth. As Figure 4 shows, a lack of
resilience may be indicated by gradually declining
agricultural productivity but, equally, collapse may
come suddenly and without warning. Recovery
may be fast, but more often is slow or incomplete.
A stress can be defined as a regular, sometimes
Anticipate Prevent Recover Learn
continuous, relatively small and predictable Survey Tolerate Restore
disturbance, for example the effect of growing soil
salinity or lack of rainfall or indebtedness. Such stresses
or chronic crises are directly damaging but sometimes
slowly culminate to cause a shock or acute crisis.
Figure 4 The range of responses to stresses and shocks
A shock is an irregular, relatively large and
unpredictable disturbance, such as is caused The steps that need to be taken to build resilience
by a rare drought or flood or a new pest (shown in Figure 4) include the anticipation of
outbreak, or when slow onset disasters pass the likelihood and location of a stress or a shock,
their tipping points and become extreme events. through some form of survey. In the case of
extreme weather events such as droughts or floods,
Many stresses and shocks are interlinked, for example, this may involve agro-climatic monitoring, such
energy and input price volatility, extreme weather as informed the Famine Early Warning Systems
events and climate change, growing scarcity of network that in 2010 forecast the likelihood
natural resources and poverty and inequality. Because of the 2011 food crisis in the Horn of Africa.
the planet is becoming more densely populated and
increasingly urbanised, both physical and social The next steps – prevention and tolerance, recovery
interactions are becoming more complex and fast and restoration – involve defining objectives,
moving. As a consequence minor adverse events identifying the various options and then appraising
become amplified and the threats to agricultural them in terms of their outcomes and the relevant
growth are multiplying in frequency and scale. costs and benefits. Preventative measures,
such as building dams or sea walls, may allow
agricultural growth to continue unhindered. But
Strengthening resilience often, the best option is some form of tolerance
that reduces the damage or allows rapid recovery.
Resilience can be strengthened in many different Frequently this will involve some form of trade-
ways, through political, economic, sociological or off, balancing agricultural productivity against
technological interventions. For example drought reducing the risk exposure. Ideally, the answer
can be countered by building irrigation systems, will lie in seeking out and implementing win-
through improved water harvesting techniques, win technologies and processes where they exist.
agro-ecological technologies such as conservation
farming and by breeding new crops or livestock that Sometimes, of course, damage is unavoidable and
are tolerant of or resistant to drought. Resilience the only response is to rebuild or restore the basis
can also be strengthened through more open trade for growth.
policies to facilitate trans-border access to food. Some
approaches are expensive, some more affordable.
11
15. Resilient Markets
Resilient markets enable farmers to increase • Attempt to prevent the imposition of export
production, take risks and generate income through bans; and
innovation, while ensuring food is available at an • Create modest physical grain reserves, for the
affordable price. World Food Program and for African regions and
certain individual nations (especially those that
A resilient market minimises the effects of stresses are landlocked).
and shocks, and is characterised by sound institutional
arrangements, transparency of price formation
and low transaction costs which bring about a
degree of price stability, benefiting both producers
and consumers. Underlying resilient markets are
significant investments in agricultural growth and in
the creation of appropriate enabling environments.
We recommend that governments work
with the private sector to:
1. Reduce food price volatility
2. Facilitate private investments
Figure 5 Recent food price spikes
Source:
3. Build better enabling environments
Figure 5 Recent food price spikes
Source: FAO
1. Reduce food price volatility
Of the 20 highest increases in commodity prices Public reserves can help during food crises in
over the last decade, 12 were for agricultural three ways: first, as domestic price stabilisation
commodities. Most recent has been a food price tools; second, as a source of emergency food
spike in 2007 and 2008 followed by a spike in 2010 for humanitarian aid during crises and third, as
which has been prolonged to the present (Figure 5). sources for food distribution programmes. These
recommendations were initially regarded as
As the 2011 G20 meeting noted such ‘excessive somewhat controversial but are being implemented
volatility not only has negative impacts on by a number of countries, at least at national level.
access to food for the poorest and on many Kenya has tripled its grain reserve in 2011 and
producers, including livestock producers affected Nigeria has adopted a policy that 15% of the total
by the volatile cost of feed, but could hamper annual grain harvest should be held in reserve.
investments and an effective market response
to a long-term increase in demand for food and Food price volatility was a priority for the French
may harm confidence in international markets.’ government’s presidency of the 2011 G20.
Agriculture ministers and heads of states and
For farmers, price volatility reduces confidence governments agreed to support the establishment
and increases risks. Rapidly rising prices also of the Agricultural Market Information System
mean increases in chronic hunger, accompanied (AMIS) in the expectation that better information
by civil unrest and outmigration. In our 2010 will help to dampen price volatility. AMIS seeks to
report we addressed these challenges and improve agricultural market information, analyses
made several recommendations, to: and forecasts at both national and international
levels; report on abnormal price activity; examine
• Explore the regulation of food markets in a manner market conditions, including structural weaknesses,
similar to the banking and financial systems; strengthening global early warning capacity;
15
19. Resilient Agriculture
Resilient agriculture creates agricultural growth out Such technologies frequently ‘work’, but may be
of knowledge and innovation, while simultaneously inappropriate or unaffordable for small farmers
building the capacity of smallholder farmers to counter and have undesirable environmental side-effects.
environmental degradation and climate change.
One alternative is to draw on ecological principles
Resilient agricultural technologies and practices to both increase production and make agriculture
build on agroecological knowledge to counter more resilient and sustainable. Examples include
stresses and shocks in ways that maintain various forms of mixed cropping that enable more
sustainable agricultural growth without contributing efficient use and cycling of soil nutrients (e.g.
to significant environmental degradation. intercropping, rotations, agroforestry, sylvo-pasture,
green manuring); integrated and intensive crop-
We recommend that governments in livestock systems, conservation farming systems
partnership with the private sector & NGOs: that use minimum or no-tillage (Box 3), microdosing
of fertilisers and herbicides and integrated pest
management. These are now proven technologies,
1. Enable resilient and sustainable
some of which build on traditional practices, with
intensification numerous examples working at least on a small
scale. The imperative now is to find ways of scaling
2. Combat land and water degradation them up to reach a wider number of farmers.
3. Build climate smart agriculture
Box 3- Conservation farming in Zambia
1. Enable resilient and
A partnership between local government
sustainable intensification bodies and the NGO Concern Worldwide is
investigating the use of conservation farming
There is little likelihood of significantly more arable as a replacement for the traditional long
land becoming available for cultivation in SSA; yet fallow system in western Zambia. Currently
we know that we have to approximately double food the woodland is felled and burnt before
production by 2050. For the past fifty years the only being ploughed and sown to maize. Crops
significant increase in global arable land has been are grown for only a couple of years and the
for crops such as oil palm and soybean, mostly on land then takes several decades to return to a
cleared rainforest or the Brazilian Cerrado. There state where it can be felled and burnt again.
may be land available for clearance in the rain The conservation farming alternative is not to
forests of the Congo basin, but this will incur a major plough but sow the seed in small ‘pockets’ in
biodiversity loss and large Greenhouse Gas emissions. the soil to which have been added two cupfuls
of manure and a soda bottle top of fertiliser.
For the future the solution to food security is to After harvest, the soil is covered with the stems
get more production out of the existing land (i.e. and leaves of the maize and next year’s seed is
increasing land productivity), but to do it in a way sown several months later in the same holes.
that is resilient and sustainable. Such intensification Despite the need to hoe weeds, the labour is
is a significant challenge. It will depend on human much less than in the conventional systems.
ingenuity, in particular in harnessing the benefits of Yields are high – some four to five tons of
ecological processes and modern plant breeding. maize growing new drought tolerant hybrids.
In the 20th century, agricultural production relied The system should allow tree or shrub cover
on technologies developed by the industrialised to remain unburned more or less permanently,
countries. These “conventional technologies” so increasing carbon sequestration and
typically deliver desired products in a ready-to-use maintaining soil carbon levels, creating a
‘packaged’ form, e.g. a bag of synthetic fertiliser more stable and sustainable farming system.
or a drum of synthetic pesticide or a tractor.
19
28. Conclusion
Today we face a range of acute and chronic crises of great magnitude. To cope,
we need to increase food production, perhaps by as much as 100% if we are to
provide widespread, inclusive food security and deliver agricultural growth. The
challenges we face on the demand side are not just rising populations, but rising
per capita incomes and changing diets, and growing demand for biofuels. At the
same time we have to cope with threats to supply caused by rising oil prices,
shortages of good quality land and water, declining increases in the yields of some
staples and, perhaps most alarming of all, the threats posed by global warming.
We also need agricultural growth not only to reduce poverty and hunger
but to contribute to a balanced and vigorous pattern of economic
development in Africa. There are good grounds for optimism. Many African
countries are exhibiting high rates of economic growth and the CAADP
process is encouraging donors to invest in agricultural development.
This year is a crucial year. The sequence of G8, G20 and Rio+20 summit meetings
provides a ready platform for coordination of policies and intensification of
investments that will promote an agenda based on growth with resilience.
As the following exemplifies, the key summits are aware of the challenges
and the opportunities are there to be seized by European and African
governments, the private sector, CSOs and NGOs working in partnership.
‘With its diverse and dynamic membership, the G20 is in a phenomenal position
to help us all think about development in new ways. Ultimately, the goal is
to combine the world’s total resources—public, private, rich, poor, and in
between—in ways that drive development forward. We need to find better ways
to bring private investment into poor countries. We need to help donors keep
their promises by looking for new sources of aid money. We need to reinforce the
dynamism of poor countries, so they can lead their own development. Finally, we
need to tap the rich experience and capacity for innovation of rapidly growing
countries that have recently travelled the development path so successfully.’
28
29. Key References
AATF. 2011. Water efficient maize for Africa. Nairobi: FAO. 2012. FAO food price index. Rome: FAO.
African Agricultural Technology Foundation. http:// http://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/wfs-home/
www.aatf-africa.org/wema/en/. foodpricesindex/en/ .
AfDB and UN Economic Commission for Africa. 2003. FAO. No date. International Treaty on Plant Genetic
Review of the implementation status of the Trans Resources for Food and Agriculture: overview. Rome:
African Highways and the missing links – Volume FAO. http://www.planttreaty.org/content/overview.
2: description of corridors. Stockholm: SWECO
International AB, Nordic Consulting Group AB. Foresight. The Future of Food and Farming (2011) Final
Project Report. The Government Office for Science,
AfDB. 2011. The middle of the pyramid: dynamics of London.
the middle class in Africa. Tunis: African Development
Bank. http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/ Gates, B. 2011. Innovation with impact: financing 21st
Documents/Publications/The%20Middle%20of%20the%20 century development. http://www.thegatesnotes.
Pyramid_The%20Middle%20of%20the%20Pyramid.pdf . com/Topics/Development/G20-Report-Innovation-with-
Impact.
Arbache, J.S. and Page, J, 2009. How fragile is Africa’s
recent growth? Journal of African economies. 19: 1-24. Ivanic, M., Martin, W. and Zaman, H. 2010. Estimating
the short-run poverty impacts of the 2010-11 surge
Badiane, O. 2008. Sustaining and accelerating Africa’s in food prices. Policy Research Working Paper 5633.
growth recovery in the context of changing global Washington, DC: World Bank.
food prices. IFPRI Policy Brief No 9, Washington, DC:
International Food Policy Research Institute. Krishna, A. 2010. One illness away: why people become
poor and how they escape poverty. Oxford: Oxford
Bio-economy Council. 2011. Annual Report 2010. Berlin: University Press.
Bio-economy Research and Technology Council (BöR).
Lobell, D., Bänziger, M., Magorokosho, C. and Vivek,
Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in B. 2011. Nonlinear heat effects on African maize as
Agriculture. 2007. Water for food, water for life: a evidenced by historical yield trials. Nature Climate
comprehensive assessment of water management Change. Doi: 10.1038/nclimate1043.
in agriculture. London: Earthscan, and Colombo:
International Water Management Institute. http://www. Nachtergaele, F. And Petri, M. 2008. Mapping land
iwmi.cgiar.org/assessment/. use systems at global and regional scales for land
degradation assessment analysis. Version 1.0. Technical
Dar, W. 2007. What ICRISAT thinks....: there is hope and report n.8 of the LADA FAO/UNEP Project.
prosperity in the drylands. Patancheru 502 324, Andhra
Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute Nelson, G., Rosegrant, M., Koo, J., Robertson, R., Sulser,
for the Semi-Arid Tropics. T., Zhu, T., Ringler, C., Msangi, S., Palazzo, A., Batka,
M., Magalhaes, M., Valmonte-Santos, R., Ewing, M. and
Europa. 2012. Commission adopts its strategy for a Lee, D. 2009. Climate change: impact on agriculture
sustainable bioeconomy to ensure smart green growth and costs of adaptation. Washington, DC: International
in Europe. Brussels: Europa. http://europa.eu/rapid/ Food Policy Research Institute.
pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/12/97
Nin-Pratt, A. 2011. Agricultural R&D investment,
FAO. 2010. FAOSTAT. Rome: FAO. http://faostat.fao. poverty and economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa:
org/. prospects and needs to 2050. Conference Working Paper
9. Prepared for the ASTI/IFPRI-FARA conference, Accra,
FAO. 2010. The state of food insecurity in the world: Ghana, 5-7 December 2011. Agricultural R&D: investing
addressing food insecurity in protracted crises. Rome: in Africa’s future. Analyzing trends, challenges and
United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation and opportunities.
World Food Programme.
Nkonya, E., Gerber, N., von Braun, J. and De Pinto,
FAO. 2011. The state of food and agriculture: women in A. 2011. Economics of land degradation. The costs of
agriculture, Closing the gender gap for development. action versus inaction. Washington, DC: IFPRI.
Rome: FAO.
29
30. Omilola, B., M. Yade, J. Karugia, and P. Chilonda. towards the health-related Millennium Development
Monitoring and Assessing Targets of the Comprehensive Goals. Geneva: WHO Media Centre. http://www.who.
Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs290/en/ .
and the First Millennium Development Goal (MDG) in
Africa. ReSAKSS Working Paper No. 31. 2010. Winters, L.A., Lim, W., Hanmer, L. and Augustin, S.
2010. Economic growth in low income countries. How
Osbahr, H., Twyman, C., Adger, W. and Thomas, D. the G20 can help to raise and sustain it. Economics
2008. Effective livelihood adaptation to climate Department Working Paper No. 8-2010. Brighton:
change disturbance: scale dimensions of practice in University of Sussex.
Mozambique. Geoforum 39: 1951–1964.
World Bank. 2007. Investment in agricultural water for
Pretty, J. 1995. Regenerating agriculture: policies and poverty reduction and economic growth in Sub-Saharan
practice for sustainability and self-reliance. London: Africa. A synthesis report. A collaborative program of
Earthscan. AfDB, FAO, IFAD, IWMI and the World Bank. Washington,
DC: World Bank.
Reij, C. 1991. Indigenous soil and water conservation
in Africa. Gatekeeper Series SA 27. London: Sustainable World Bank. 2009. World Development Indicators.
Agriculture Programme, International Institute for Washington, DC: World Bank.
Environment and Development.
World Bank. 2011. World Development Indicators:
Reij, C., Scoones, I. and Toulmin, C. (eds) 1996. fertilizer consumption. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Sustaining the soil: indigenous soil and water http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.CON.FERT.
conservation in Africa. London: Earthscan. PT.ZS
Sanchez, P. 2002. Soil fertility and hunger in Africa. You, L., Ringler, C., Nelson, G., Wiid-Sichra, U.,
Science. 295: 2019-2020. Robertson, R., Woods, S., Guo, Z., Zhu, T. and Sun,
Y. 2010. What is the irrigation potential for Africa?
Skees, J., Hazell, P. and Miranda, M. 1999. New A combined biophysical and socioeconomic approach.
approaches to crop yield insurance in developing IFPRI Discussion paper 00993. Washington, DC:
countries. Environment and Production Technology International Food Policy Research Institute.
Division Discussion Paper No. 55. Washington, DC: IFPRI.
The Montpellier Panel. 2010. Africa and Europe:
partnerships for agricultural development. London:
Agriculture for Impact. http://www.imperial.ac.uk/
africanagriculturaldevelopment/themontpellierpanel/
panelreport.
UN. 2009. United Nations Millennium Development
Goals Report. New York: United Nations.
UN. 2012. The future we want. New York: United
Nations. http://www.uncsd2012.org/rio20/content/
documents/370The%20Future%20We%20Want%20
10Jan%20clean.pdf
UNICEF. 2010. Nutrition statistics. New York: UNICEF.
http://www.unicef.org/rightsite/sowc/pdfs/statistics/
SOWC_Spec_Ed_CRC_TABLE%202.%20NUTRITION_
EN_111309.pdf.
Wheeler T., Craufurd P., Ellis R., Porter J. and Vara
Prasad P. 2000. Temperature variability and the yield of
annual crops. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment.
82: 159-167.
WHO. 2011. Millennium Development Goals: progress
30
32. The Montpellier Panel
All Panel members serve in a personal capacity
Gordon Conway (Chair)
Professor of International Development, Agriculture for Impact, Imperial College London
Tom Arnold
Chief Executive, Concern Worldwide
Joachim von Braun
Director, Department of Economic and Technological Change,
Center for Development Research, University of Bonn
Henri Carsalade
Chair of the ICARDA Board of Trustees and President of Agropolis Foundation
Louise Fresco
Professor, University of Amsterdam
Peter Hazell
Visiting Professor, Imperial College London
Namanga Ngongi
President, Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA)
David Radcliffe
Senior Advisor, Agricultural Research for Development
DG Development and Cooperation, European Commission
Lindiwe Majele Sibanda
Chief Executive, Food, Agriculture and Natural Resources Policy Analysis Network (FANRPAN)
Ramadjita Tabo
Deputy Executive Director, Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA)
Prabhu Pingali
Deputy Director, Agricultural Development, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Observer)
Camilla Toulmin
Director, International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) (Moderator)
32