Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Content & Features Reno: Less Is More
1. Content and Features Reno: Less is More
Internet Librarian 2017
October 23 – Monterey, CA
Charlie Morris
Lead Web Developer
Discovery, Access and Web Services
Penn State University Libraries
Twitter: @cdmo
cdmorris@psu.edu
2. Quick Outline
• About Penn State
• Why more can be a problem
• The problem faced
• Goals of the project
• Development perspective
• Content work
• Finished product
9. The “portal plague”
“Portals, as you may know, are the
most deadly plague of the global
web…
... (the) path of survival in the 21st
century is clear and ahead; be like
Google. Simple, unobtrusive,
serving and humble”
-Philipp Lenssen 2003
http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2003_08_01_index.html
10. “To gain several minutes of user
attention, you must clearly communicate
your value proposition within 10
seconds.”
-Jakob Nielsen
https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-long-do-users-stay-on-web-pages/
18. "Always implement things when you actually need them, never when you just
foresee that you need them."
Src: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_aren%27t_gonna_need_it
19. Project Management Approach
1. Project one-pagers for all web development features (YAGNI…)
2. Non IT department “product owner” for decision-making
3. Explain technical options clearly
4. Lo-fi wireframes
5. Demo often
6. ”Iterate” on design and improvements
21. One Pager (Project Brief)
• Project Name
• One line description
• Requirements
• Out of Scope
• Team
• Schedule
22. One Pagers
Pro
• Trim wasted time in planning
docs that aren’t useful
• Especially with out of scope:
address any predicted points of
conflict and scope creep
Con
• Agreed on terms aren’t always
the same in everyone’s head
• Difficult to determine when
needed – what is a project?
23. Features and Functionality List
• Hours of Operation
• Alerts
• Homepage Feature
• Scholarly Database API
Consumption
• Separate Staff Site with it’s own
custom theme and features
• LibGuides API Integration
• Staff Directory
• Custom Theme
• Computer Availability API
Integration
• Custom Content Workflow
System
24. Features and Functionality List
• Hours of Operation
• Alerts
• Homepage Feature
• Scholarly Database API
Consumption
• Separate Staff Site with it’s own
custom theme and features
• LibGuides API Integration
• Staff Directory
• Custom Theme
• Computer Availability API
Integration
• Custom Content Workflow
System
Occam’s Meat Cleaver
Image source: https://pixabay.com/en/cleaver-halloween-fear-knife-1756677/
25. Out of Scope’d
• Geolocation
• Web Service Endpoint creation
• QR codes
• Too many email triggers
• Personalization
• Over-integration of systems
• Semantic web work
• “Chasing Tech”
29. Audit, Filter, Place
• Separation of internal and external content
• Integrate disparate content into user centered menu
no one knows what an Access Services department is
• Update/adjust content as needed
• Eliminate ROT (redundant, outdated, trivial)
30. “No Workflow” Workflow
• Trained author team
• After-the-fact review
• One source as much as possible
39. More work for less
• Usability studies
• Homepage updates
• Main landing page updates
• Better interface for research options for students
• The never-ending challenge of serving so many campuses across the
state in one place
How can we do less better?
40. “What I'd like to suggest is a different
approach. Instead of one-upping, try one-
downing. Instead of outdoing, try
underdoing. Do less than your competitors to
beat them.”
-37signals (makers of Basecamp, Ruby on Rails)
Editor's Notes
Intros
First, A little background.
The Penn State University Libraries serves a huge constituency…and it’s structure can be very complicated.
27 locations, across the state of pennsylvania 46,055 square miles (1 for every 1,705 sq mi)
99,133 students as of 2016 (wikipedia)
One library geographically dispersed – single dean
24 campus libraries, 2 law libraries and 2 medical school libraries
4 branch libraries at the main campus
12 subject/special libraries within our main building
36 departments, 1 division (PSU Press)
As you can imagine, this complicated structure, vast audience and big hearted librarians caused a few problems in our site
We’ll call them opportunities
We’ll call them opportunities
We’ll call them opportunities
We’ll call them opportunities
Charlie
Migration plan
Designer
Development
Section by section:
home page, jobs pages, hours pages
landing pages
rearchitecture of services/research - May, 2016
Departments and Libraries - August, 2016
Migration complete and decommission - early September
Charlie
Charlie
Charlie
Charlie
Charlie
Charlie
Charlie
Charlie
Charlie
Content inventory – every piece of content
Based on google analytics
Helped build our case for content management and oversight
As we worked through our content inventory
Every piece of content reviewed - Meetings with every library and department , not always an easy sell
web content is a valuable resource that should be curated, reviewed and weeded like any other collection – less is more
Separate internal and external content
Every page has an owner
avoid content ROT (redundant, outdated, trivial)
Charlie
Charlie
Information architecture
Updated navigation focusing on services (not where you get them) and research tools
Department pages are not subsites, but are simple, directory pages
Subject and campus libraries pages are “at a glance pages”
What do they have physically in their building – rooms and spaces
What’s different – the way they lend reserves?
What’s special about them – collections, librarians? subjects
So What’s next?
Discovery – Database discovery project, staff profiles, LOD, schema.org, resources, people, services
better planning for UX and analytics
More transparency for pos in git lab
tactics for continuing to make the site better for users