3. Professor
Edmund
Phelps
Less than 10% of business ideas even get started
Nobel
Prize in
Economics
2006
10k business ideas
1k firms started
100 VC funded
20 IPO
2
market
leaders
4. 55% of US venture capital investments are written
off
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
x<0.5
0.5<=x<1
x=1
1<x<2
% Cost
% Value
2<=x<5
x>=5
5. 62% of EU investments are written off
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
x<0.5
0.5<=x<1
x=1
1<x<2
% Cost
% Value
2<=x<5
x>=5
6. But the capital which survives, backs businesses
accounting for 21% of US GDP…..
1978
1981
1987
1995
1995
1997
1999
1999
2005
serving >1bn customers
creating 440k new jobs
with $545bn in new annual revenue
and $1.4tn in new market value
Source: HIS Global Insight
7. And in Europe we are starting to build waves of similar dimensions
8. So are venture capitalists just bad at assessing risk
or do they really understand innovation economics?
10. And marketplaces adding further scale to open up risk adjusted
and scaleable funding to new sectors…..
Creative & Consumer Electronics
Microfinance
Startups
SMEs
11. We’ve had almost 60 years of evidence on how innovation economics
can drive explosive social and economic value creation…..
Hardware
Crowd
Software
Internet
Semis
Networking
Mobile
Cloud
12. But can venture’s real legacy be a broader understanding
and application of innovation economics?
13. Extreme risk of 62% write-offs is definitely
not for everyone, including many
entrepreneurs and venture investors…..
.
14. .
In fact a 2% loss ratio for banks lending
to SMEs is already pushing the boundaries
15. But there is so much cash out there….
$85tn global AUM
($12k per human)
$266bn FTSE100
($5k per UK citizen)
16. Can’t we be more adventurous on how we
allocate and manage it?
17. We know 7% of small companies create
>50% of new jobs
.
21. Which is a shame, as radical risks create biggest rewards….
22. There is a huge area between 2% and 62% loss, surely we can
loosen our view of risk a little?
2%
Corporate
Finance
.
62%
Venture
Capital
23. Look at the facts again
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
x<0.5
0.5<=x<1
x=1
1<x<2
% Cost
% Value
2<=x<5
x>=5
24. Power laws mean you have spectacular losses or wins
60
50
40
30
£200bn
mkt cap
£10bn
IT write off
20
10
0
x<0.5
0.5<=x<1
x=1
1<x<2
% Cost
% Value
2<=x<5
x>=5
25. If you feel comfortable managing risk, you might
as well shoot for the moon
26. And in Europe we have a generation with nothing to lose….
27. But how can we expect people to embrace risk when large
corporates, governments and educators won’t?
2%
Corporate
.
62%
Venture
28. We have grown up in cultures with relative excellence
in health, education, security and political stability
29. But what skills have we developed to navigate this
new chaotic and risky environment?
39. So how we can get more value from $4tn we spend annually on
educating and preparing people for their future
60
???
50
40
30
$570 per
person
20
10
0
x<0.5
0.5<=x<1
x=1
1<x<2
% Cost
% Value
2<=x<5
x>=5
54. You can never de-risk people element, so look
for…
Self-awareness & honesty
Intrinsic Motivation & social capital
Determination & humility
Creativity & ability to inspire
Emotional intelligence
….. Are they lucky?
55. Take your losses as early and cheaply as you can and move on
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
x<0.5
0.5<=x<1
x=1
1<x<2
% Cost
% Value
2<=x<5
x>=5
56. Spread your risks
Impossible to know where success will come from
Just try stuff out
Be open, not closed
Always reinvest some of your winnings
Embrace the network – its your greatest untapped resource and now it can talk back
57. But if you find the wave and you know what you’re doing, you
can climb the power curve, and win – spectacularly and globally
58. So aim too high.
The prize is huge and we all have an
amazing start just by being here
A way of describing the odds: Edmund Phelps, a Columbia economics professor and Nobel laureate, described the odds in his new book, “Mass Flourishing: How Grassroots Innovation Created Jobs, Challenge and Change” as “from 10,000 business ideas, as 1,000 firms are founded, 100 receive venture capital, 20 go on to raise capital in an initial public offering, and two become market leaders.”
According to the venture impact study, IHS Global Insight, originally VC-backed companies accounted for 11.87m jobs and over $3.1 trn in revenue in the US in 2011—accounting for 21% of GDP and 11% of private-sector employment. At Index, our portfolio companies alone have generated $4bn worth of revenue, while growing on average by more than 75%, creating 20k jobs with 1k positions currently openPeople say VC doesn’t add anythign but maybe when we look back on this cambrian explosion of innovation from 1960s (semis) to 2020s (cloud connected services in every sector) – the broadscale application and understanding of venture economics will be the true legacy of venture rather than Apple, Cisco, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Salesforce, Skype and TwitterDATA: https://docs.google.com/a/indexventures.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArWfM5OOjmKZdDJ4QWcwcHh5UFZSYm9KSENDRHBONWc&usp=drive_web#gid=0
Seedcamp stats:93 companies since 2007- 83% start-ups raised capital$120m total raised 76 operational6 acquired11 closed850 jobs createdYC stats:511 companies since 2005Average value of a YC-financed start-up is $22.4m37 start-ups have either sold for, or are now worth, more than $40m.If you take last two years of classes out of these numbers (given that it takes time for a company to grow), and you look at 300 companies in YC instead of 511, that means the odds of +$40m success are about 1 in 10.As of 2011, YC had 25 companies of 316 acquired. Of these, 5 exits for over $10 million, and the combined value of the top 21 companies was $4.7bn.TechStars stats:256 companies since 200771% companies funded$400m raised204 operational24 acquired28 failed- 1,882 jobs createdBased on new realities:- Cost of company creation - cloud/SaaS, open source, platforms, Capital efficiency of scale up -> Global markets (talent, customers, finance)YC numbers in 2011: http://ycombinator.com/nums.htmlWAYRA stats: (297 start-ups, €9.7m total investment, 70% commercially trading)
Kickstarter:$810m total dollars pledged49,355 successfully funded projects4.9m total backers1.4m repeat backers11.2m total pledgesFunding Circle: £156m successful loans£39m principal repaid£113m loans outstanding, with 98.5% repayments coming in on time5.8% average net return (before tax)55k people in UK have joined to lend to businessesAngelist: $200m investments$186m through introductions$14m through direct “invest online” product21k investors on platform1,300 companies successfully raised funding
US: A study by three students at Columbia business school looked at the expected rate of credit losses on banks’ loan portfolios and came up with a benchmark of sorts: For our sample (Q4:1996-Q2:2012), the average (median) ALLL is 1.54% (1.37%) of gross loans held for investment: (http://www4.gsb.columbia.edu/filemgr?&file_id=7221887). EUROPE: According to the IMF, the level of non-performing loans as a share of total loans made in 2012 in Europe, was quite high– around 6% in the EU27.EU SMEs rely heavily on banks for funding. Around 75% of corporate financing in the EU is obtained from banks, compared to about 30% in the US. The EU crisis has now highlighted that this is a huge vulnerability for SMEs in Europe. KR: European banking report: http://www.ebf-fbe.eu/uploads/FF2012.pdf)http://www.zyyne.com/zh5/100747#p=7
Major corporates are hoarding cash– a more granular look at point you’re making.In fact, tech titans Apple, Microsoft, Google, Cisco (CSCO), Oracle (ORCL), Intel (INTC) and Big Pharma giants Pfizer (PFE), Merck (MRK), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Amgen (AMGN) collectively have more than $435 billion in cash on their balance sheets. (Feb 2013, Fortune, http://buzz.money.cnn.com/2013/02/12/apple-cash/)FTSE 100 numbers: market cap: $2.7 trillionRevenues: $280 billionStaff: 6.5 millionCash on balance sheets: $266 billionIT budgets: 1-8%
Kauffman report, 2012: Looking into its portfolio of nearly 100 VC funds, including what it says are some of the most notable and exclusive names (confidentiality agreements barred it from naming them), the foundation found that only 20 of them beat a public-market equivalent by more than 3% annually, and half of those started investing before 1995.“There are not enough strong VC investors with above-market returns to absorb even our limited investment capital,” the Kauffman Foundation concludesHBS research:Research by HBS which look at US venture returns from 2004-2010 says that about 75% of VC firms don’t return investors capital, based on data from 2,000 companies that received venture funding of at least $1m
Kauffman report, 2012: Looking into its portfolio of nearly 100 VC funds, including what it says are some of the most notable and exclusive names (confidentiality agreements barred it from naming them), the foundation found that only 20 of them beat a public-market equivalent by more than 3% annually, and half of those started investing before 1995.“There are not enough strong VC investors with above-market returns to absorb even our limited investment capital,” the Kauffman Foundation concludesHBS research:Research by HBS which look at US venture returns from 2004-2010 says that about 75% of VC firms don’t return investors capital, based on data from 2,000 companies that received venture funding of at least $1m
Kauffman report, 2012: Looking into its portfolio of nearly 100 VC funds, including what it says are some of the most notable and exclusive names (confidentiality agreements barred it from naming them), the foundation found that only 20 of them beat a public-market equivalent by more than 3% annually, and half of those started investing before 1995.“There are not enough strong VC investors with above-market returns to absorb even our limited investment capital,” the Kauffman Foundation concludesHBS research:Research by HBS which look at US venture returns from 2004-2010 says that about 75% of VC firms don’t return investors capital, based on data from 2,000 companies that received venture funding of at least $1m
KR: A recent study by the Product Development and Management Association found that radical innovation accounted for only 10 percent of an average company’s innovation portfolio, down from 21 percent in 1990. As the new productivity measures gained traction, managers naturally gravitated to projects that succeeded under the new constraints. More and more, breakthrough projects with high failure rates and less predictability lost out when investment priorities were set. (BCG, Managing the Unmanageable: Radical Innovation, 2013) (KR has PDF from David Dean)
Power laws are a fundamental departure from how we have come to understand the world. The fact that they will only show up more often means no matter what we do, we need to understand how they work and what causes them.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_law
iPhoneSelf-driving carsHealth
What did these governments spend in a year on DEFENSE, EDUCATION, HEALTH:See google doc for this data: https://docs.google.com/a/indexventures.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArWfM5OOjmKZdDJ4QWcwcHh5UFZSYm9KSENDRHBONWc&usp=drive_web#gid=1
ORIGINAL STUDY…http://digitalcollections.library.cmu.edu/awweb/awarchive?type=file&item=44582Forty years ago, in a paper in American Scientist, Herbert Simon and William Chase drew one of the most famous conclusions in the study of expertise:There are no instant experts in chess—certainly no instant masters or grandmasters. There appears not to be on record any case (including Bobby Fischer) where a person reached grandmaster level with less than about a decade's intense preoccupation with the game. We would estimate, very roughly, that a master has spent perhaps 10,000 to 50,000 hours staring at chess positions…KR: After Simon and Chase’s paper, for example, the psychologist John Hayes looked at seventy-six famous classical composers and found that, in almost every case, those composers did not create their greatest work until they had been composing for at least ten years.
(Fiverr, Taskrabbit)
http://englishjobsturkey.com/download-esl-lesson-plans/http://www.educationdive.com/news/teacher-claims-she-made-1m-selling-lesson-plans-to-other-teachers/59021/http://pandodaily.com/2013/07/08/lessons-from-the-first-millionaire-online-teacher/Elance, one of many online freelance hubs that matches freelancers with clients, recently announced that hiring by businesses through its site increased by 60% last year. In its Annual Impact Report, conducted by the the third-party research firm Imperative, 74% of employers said they expected to enlist more freelancers in 2013. (Forbes)