Enterprise Implementation With Sa And Tau

•Download as PPT, PDF•

0 likes•248 views

Bill Duncan

Technology Business

Enterprise Implementation System Architect and Tau working together

The Workflow Driven Environment Develop enterprise architecture Analyze & optimize business strategies Deploy & maintain Design services & applications Business requirements User requirements System requirements Trace and analyze relationships

Defense Workflow Develop defense architecture Analyze & optimize operations strategies Deploy & maintain Design services & applications Program requirements Project requirements System requirements Trace and analyze relationships

The IBM Solution Develop enterprise architecture Analyze & optimize business strategies Deploy & maintain Design services & applications Business requirements User requirements System requirements Trace and analyze relationships System Architect Tau DOORS Common Repository

Telelogic Tau ® - Model-Driven Development for Complex IT ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],“ Tau enables our architects, systems engineers, and software developers to improve the development process. We can use a single tool for analysis, design, and auto code generation . ” - Nigel Bartlett, Director of Wireless Communications Software, Hughes Network Systems

Tau Vision ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Tau for Model-Driven SOA ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Enterprise Architecture through Implementation System Architect  Tau ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Modeling the Enterprise Architecture Network Concept Diagram Application Architecture Business Process Diagram Enterprise Direction Diagram Service Collaboration Diagram

Business Analysis & Planning ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Business Services Deployment Platform Enterprise Architecture guidance accountability Design services Implement services Integrate services Test services Scope business Analyze organization Identify services Plan roadmaps

Deployment Analysis ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Project Architecture Analysis and Design ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Systems & Application Development ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Software Development ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Encouraging Reuse ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Collaboration ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Round Trip Traceability - The Audit Trail business requirements user requirements system requirements business processes service design

Summary ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

More from Bill Duncan

A guide to using the Jazz Team Build feature in Rational Team Concert Veena H. Balakrishnaiah (veena.balakrishna@in.ibm.com), Build and Release Engineer, IBM Summary: Veena H. Balakrishnaiah gives an overview of how to configure source control and Jazz Team Build components of Rational Team Concert to define and manage your build. Jazz builds run against files that come from a designated build repository workspace and include traceability between change sets and work items. Jazz Team Builds provide support for the automation, monitoring, and awareness of a team's regular builds. This article originally appeared at http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/create-software-builds-jazz-team-build/index.html?ca=drs-

Create software builds with jazz team build

Bill Duncan

How DOORS Helps JPL Get to Mars & Beyond

Bill Duncan

Space Quarterly: September 2011

Bill Duncan

Tutorial: Create a custom work item in Rational Team Concert

Bill Duncan

Abstract This white paper provides you with information on how to implement access restrictions to your Enterprise Architecture (EA) Artifacts using IBM Rational System Architect Catalog Manager. Content This white paper discusses what Rational System Architect Catalog Manager is and how it can be used to addresses the concerns of "Visibility" and "Security". The paper also gives problem scenarios and then the solutions to those scenarios to help easier understanding of the capabilities.

How to implement access restrictions to your EA artifacts using Rational Syst...

Bill Duncan

Speed delivery of Android devices and applications with model-driven development

Bill Duncan

Summary: When using IBM® Rational® Performance Tester for testing diversified protocols and large volume load simulations, it is essential to optimize the performance of your testing machines and tools, as well as your network and infrastructure. In this article, you will discover best practices that you can adopt to enhance the load generation capability of Rational Performance Tester per machine by configuring both the testing tool and the operating system. You will also learn about techniques that you can use to alleviate trivial errors that occur during large volume load simulations.

Optimize load handling for high-volume tests with IBM Rational Performance Te...

Bill Duncan

This article explains techniques to generate documents from IBM® Rational® Rhapsody SysML models, using the Rhapsody ReporterPLUS feature. Automated document generation from existing models enhances consistency between the different representations of the system used throughout system development. Using the right techniques, it is possible to produce publication-ready, human-readable documents that support engineering processes.

Automate document generation from SysML models with Rational Rhapsody Reporte...

Bill Duncan

Automate document generation from sys ml models with rational rhapsody report...

Bill Duncan

Remote attackers using the Internet could seize control of servers on NASA's agency-wide mission networks that guide spacecraft, potentially causing havoc with America's space missions, the space agency's inspector general said in a new report. The audit - Inadequate Security Practices Expose Key NASA Network to Cyberattack - didn't link any specific mission to specific vulnerabilities, but did mention that the NASA mission network is widely distributed and hosts more than 190 IT systems and projects run by the agency's mission directorates and Jet Propulsion Laboratory, including the Hubble space telescope, space shuttle and international space station and the Cassini and lunar reconnaissance orbiters.

Inadequate Security Practices Expose Key NASA Network to Cyber Attack

Bill Duncan

Integrate Rational DOORS and Rational Team Concert change management

Bill Duncan

IBM Rational Harmony Deskbook rel 3.1.2

Bill Duncan

By default, IBM® Rational® Performance Tester provides essential performance metrics, such as throughput, response times, concurrency, and success rate. However, it also includes several advanced features for detailed analysis, many of which are not commonly used. Proper use of these options provides deeper insight when analyzing test results. This article gives five tips for using some of these advanced features, all of which have helped tremendously in real-world performance testing projects with large companies.

Advanced Rational Performance Tester reports

Bill Duncan

Abstract This document describes why requirements need to be tracked and also explains how tracking can be setup and managed. Content The IBM Rational System Architect DOORS integration helps users create abstract views in System Architect based on the user requirements in IBM Rational DOORS. Having this integration will enable users to synchronize the model with the ever changing requirements. This document can be used as a reference for users who would like to map their requirements captured in DOORS to a modeling tool Rational System Architect. Also, there would be an information flow between DOORS to System Architect and vice-versa. Using the document provided, users can map the requirements in DOORS to the System Architect project encyclopedia and vice versa. As a summary, this document can prove effective as a start point for new users who are in the process of exploring this integration and its benefits.

Managing requirements across Analysis and Design phases using System Architec...

Bill Duncan

Rational Team Concert integrates work item tracking, source control management, continuous builds, iteration planning, and a highly configurable process support to adapt to the way you want to work, enabling developers, architects, project managers, and project owners to work together effectively. Rational Team Concert 3.0 coming November 23rd! Here are some highlights of what's coming in the next version: * Simplified packaging * Advanced planning for formal and agile teams * Flexible customization and configuration * Distributed source control * Enterprise build support, with enhanced Build Forge integration * Enterprise platform enhancements (z/OS and Power) * Enhanced client for Microsoft Visual Studio IDE * Open integrations to your existing tools, including a new DOORS 9.3 integration and OpenSocial support

What's New in Rational Team Concert 3.0

Bill Duncan

Abstract This paper will address using Build Forge to integrate Rational products to fix or “phone home” potential support issues proactively without user intervention. Content Refrigerator companies have often floated the idea of having intelligent refrigerators that would call in service requests for themselves when components were failing. The basis of this idea is that better diagnostics are driven by greater integration between computerized parts. This paper brings this idea to Rational products by using Build Forge to fix or “phone home” potential support issues proactively without user intervention.

Automatic Proactive Troubleshooting with IBM Rational Build Forge

Bill Duncan

This technical solution briefly describes how the SAP CoE / Value Prototyping successfully leveraged IBM Rational Performance Tester 8.0 to test an ABAP Web Dynpro application before it went into production. The paper shows how IBM testing tools can be used to simulate user load on any SAP system and measure the system’s behavior under load. The solution described in this paper was used in an SAP internal project to measure a new SAP application before it was implemented internally.

Load Testing SAP Applications with IBM Rational Performance Tester

Bill Duncan

ISS Docking Standards

Bill Duncan

Results NASA has taken preliminary steps to meet OMB requirements for IPv6 transition and integration, including assigning a lead official in November 2005 to coordinate NASA's efforts, developing inventories of IP-aware devices and an impact analysis, and in June 2008 demonstrating IPv6 capability of one NASA network . However, as of March 2010 the Agency did not have an updated or complete IPv6 transition plan as required by OMB. This occurred, in part, because the Agency has ample IPv4 addresses to meet its current and future requirements and because the individual who was leading the IPv6 transition effort left NASA in November 2006 and no one has been assigned to replace him. As a result, the Agency does not have adequate assurance that it has considered all necessary transition elements or that the security and interoperability of its systems will not be affected as other Government agencies and entities transition to IPv6. Accordingly, even if NASA can continue meeting its communication needs using IPv4 addresses, it should ensure that its systems are prepared as other Internet users transition to IPv6.

NASA OIG: Status of NASA's Transition to Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)

Bill Duncan

We found that NASA's IT security program had not fully implemented key FISMA requirements needed to adequately secure Agency information systems and data. For example, we found that only 24 percent (7 of 29) of the systems we reviewed met FISMA requirements for annual security controls testing and only 52 percent (15 of 29) met FISMA requirements for annual contingency plan testing. In addition, only 40 percent (2 of 5) of the external systems we reviewed were certified and accredited. These deficiencies occurred because NASA did not have an independent verification and validation function for its IT security program . We also found that NASA's Office of Chief Information Officer (OCIO) had not effectively managed corrective action plans used to prioritize the mitigation of IT security weaknesses. This occurred because OCIO did not have a formal policy for managing the plans and did not follow recognized best practices when it purchased an information system that it hoped would facilitate Agency-wide management of IT corrective action plans. However, after spending more than $3 million on the system since October 2005, implementation of the software failed. The Agency is currently expending funds to acquire a replacement system. Specifically, we found that the information system was significantly underutilized and therefore was not an effective tool for managing corrective action plans across NASA. For example, the system contained corrective actions plans for only 2 percent (7 of 289) of the 29 systems we sampled. In our judgment, the system was underutilized because OCIO did not fully document detailed system requirements prior to selecting the system and did not have users validate requirements via acceptance testing prior to implementing it. Because the information system contained minimal data and the manual process the Agency relied on was not consistently followed, OCIO's management of corrective actions plans was ineffective and did not ensure that significant IT security weaknesses were corrected in a timely manner. Until NASA takes steps to fully meet FISMA requirements and to improve its system acquisition practices, NASA's IT security program will not be fully effective in protecting critical Agency information systems. Moreover, until such improvements are made OCIO will not be in a position to effectively allocate resources to correct IT security weaknesses. Management 1 NPR 2810.1A, "Security of Information Technology," Chapter7, defines moderate impact as "loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability could be expected to have a serious adverse effect on NASA operations, organizational assets, or individuals." High impact is defined as "loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability could be expected to have a severe or catastrophic adverse effect on NASA operations, organizational assets, or individuals." 2 NASA OIG. "Federal Information Security Management Act: Fiscal Year 2009 Report from the Office of Inspector General" (IG-10-001, November 10, 2009). 3 NASA OIG. "Review of the Information Technology Security of the Internet Protocol Operational Network (IONet)" (IG-10-013, May 13, 2010); and NASA OIG. "Audit of NASA's Efforts to Continuously Monitor Critical Information Technology Security Controls" (IG-10-019, September 14, 2010).

OIG: Review of NASA's Management and Oversight of Its Information Technology ...

Bill Duncan

More from Bill Duncan (20)