O slideshow foi denunciado.
Utilizamos seu perfil e dados de atividades no LinkedIn para personalizar e exibir anúncios mais relevantes. Altere suas preferências de anúncios quando desejar.

OKFest2014 glam-survey_workshop_20140717

1.059 visualizações

Publicada em

OKFest 2014, Berlin. Workshop regarding the OpenGLAM Benchmark Survey.

Publicada em: Ciências
  • Seja o primeiro a comentar

  • Seja a primeira pessoa a gostar disto

OKFest2014 glam-survey_workshop_20140717

  1. 1. Getting Ready for the OpenGLAM Benchmark Survey 17 July 2014 – OKFest, Berlin ▶ Bern University of Applied Sciences | E-Government Institute || Open Knowledge | OpenGLAM Working Group Alte Nationalgalerie (Berlin), Wikimedia Commons, Thomas Wolf, CC-by-sa This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License.
  2. 2. ▶ Introduction to the OpenGLAM Benchmark Survey project Beat Estermann ▶ Getting a maximum out of the survey • The Netherlands Joris Pekel • Finland Laura Sillanpää • India Subhasish Panigrahi ▶ Discussion and Questions & Answers Moderation: Lieke Ploeger Welcome!
  3. 3. Introduction to the OpenGLAM Benchmark Survey Project
  4. 4. ▶ Online survey conducted among heritage institutions throughout the world in the second half of 2014. ▶ Focusing on questions related to digitization, exchange of metadata, open data/open content, semantic web, social media, crowdsourcing ▶ Inspired by an earlier pilot survey, carried out in Switzerland in 2012 ▶ Organized in a federative manner, which means that the organization depends on volunteers and partners in each country What is the OpenGLAM Benchmark Survey about?
  5. 5. ▶ Measure the state of advancement of OpenGLAM in the participating countries ▶ Inform the GLAM community about the latest developments in the area of OpenGLAM ▶ Identify potential partners for open data and/or crowdsourcing projects ▶ Use the study report as a communication instrument to promote OpenGLAM ▶ Use the study report as an instrument for lobbying activities in favour of OpenGLAM and the advancement of free knowledge ▶ Provide international comparisons: • Allowing each country to see where it stands compared to other countries. • Provide the international OpenGLAM community with a tool that helps it better understand the particularities of each country What do we want to achieve?
  6. 6. Overview of participating countries Further countries are welcome to join! Overview: https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/OpenGLAM_Benchmark_Survey/Participating_countries Participation status (as of 17 July 2014) Green: committed Yellow: awaiting confirmation Underlying graphic file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BlankMap-World-v2.png Roke et al. (CC-by-sa)
  7. 7. ▶ Join one of the national teams or set-up your own! ▶ Main tasks at the national level: • Ensure the translation of the questionnaire into your national language(s) • Gather e-mail contacts of the heritage institutions in your country • Answer questions during the adminstration of the questionnaire ▶ Optional: • Promote the survey results in your country • Carry out country-specific analyses of the survey data • Promote OpenGLAM in your country How can you contribute?
  8. 8. Getting a maximum out of the survey • The Netherlands • Finland • India
  9. 9. The Netherlands George Hendrik Breitner - De Singelbrug bij de Paleisstraat. Rijksmuseum (Public Domain)
  10. 10. ▶ OpenCultuurData.nl ▶ NL Wikimedia chapter has (payed) GLAMwiki coordinator ▶ Largest provider of open images in Europeana ▶ Number of international key players such as the Rijksmuseum, Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision and the National Library ▶ Open culture initiatives get some funding from the ministry of culture ▶ Very often one department very active, the other one not at all. ▶ Smaller and mid-size institutions getting more interest in opening their collections, lots of questions about how to best do this OpenGLAM in the Netherlands
  11. 11. ▶ What do we want to get out of this survey? ▶ Data! ▶ Mapping the sector ▶ Encourage institutions to think about their digital strategy ▶ Go beyond „The usual suspects“ ▶ What we have done so far: ▶ Help develop the survey questions ▶ Pre-test with a number of institutions ▶ People contacted very enthousiastic ▶ Difficulty with getting contact details. Mostly our own networks Implementing the OpenGLAM Survey in the Netherlands
  12. 12. ▶ How to reach the people that are not in some way thinking about opening up their colllections already, should we? ▶ What to do if the museum associations etc. are not willing to share their contacts/the survey? ▶ What would be a minimum number of respondents to make it useful? Questions
  13. 13. ▶ The Finnish context: ▶ Digitisation of cultural objects increased substantially after 2008: The Ministry of Education and Culture’s discretionary funding ▶ Finland still behind many European countries in terms of open cultural data and related aspects of openness ▶ Open cultural data master course in 2014 by Open Knowledge Finland ▶ Local objectives for OpenGLAM Benchmark Survey ▶ Help spread awareness of open culture and cultural data in general ▶ Map the actual situation in relation to open cultural data & learn what is needed ▶ Compare the Finnish situation with those of other countries and learn from good practices Finland http://avoinglam.fi https://twitter.com/avoinglam https://www.flickr.com/avoinglam
  14. 14. India आदिवासी कलाकारों द्वारा नृत्य प्रिर्शन.jpg by User:Anilbhardwajnoida/Wikimedia Commons. CC-BY-SA 3.0
  15. 15. India ▶ Wikimedia India chapter and WMF's India program worked together for India's first GLAM project ▶ Good traction of image contribution during the Wiki Loves Monument photo contest ▶ Mass communication and other media institutions slowly taking interst in open audio library ▶ OpenGLAM initiatives related to digitization could get support from the government as digitization is a priority across departments ▶ Majority of GLAM institutions lack knowledge about open culture, need for outreach ▶ Relicensing and book digitization have gained public interest
  16. 16. ▶ What do we want to get out of this survey? ▶ Data! ▶ Mapping the sector ▶ Encourage institutions to think about their digital strategy ▶ Show institutions "what is there for them“ ▶ What we have done so far: ▶ Started filing Right to Information (RT) asking the state government departments for lists of institutions ▶ Reached out to WMIN seeking help for creating a list ▶ Difficulty with getting people and contact details Implementing the OpenGLAM Survey in India
  17. 17. ▶ What to do if the museum associations etc. are not willing to share their contacts/the survey? ▶ What would be a minimum number of respondents to make it useful? Questions
  18. 18. Discussion Questions & Answers
  19. 19. ▶ Contact Details: • Beat Estermann E-mail: beat.estermann@bfh.ch Phone: +41 31 848 34 38 • Lieke Ploeger E-mail: lieke.ploeger@okfn.org ▶ Project Portal: • http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/OpenGLAM_Benchmark_Survey Thank you for your participation!

×