SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 30
0
Right First Time Six Sigma Project
“Improve batch record system for Packaging ”
Start Date: 01 Feb 2008
Black Belt: Marina Suryanto
Sponsor: Sis Mardini (QO Manager)
Process Owner: Raharsih Basrodin (Production)
Team Members: Production: Lily, Yaseph, Lely
QA: S. Wigati, Yodi, Melissa
I-nexus ID: 3,031
1
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
The lead time to manufacture to release is too long.
Problem Statement
Business Case
Expected business results:
• Reliable supply of product
• Improve quality of records
• Reduce time and efforts needed to complete batch
documentation
2
Scope
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
The lead time to manufacture comprises of 2 parts i.e:
1. Raw material receipt to bulk film coated tablet and
final blend release (Project INX 7724 by JTM)
2. Primary packaging to product disposition
Product : Ponstan 500 mg Film Coated Tablet (FCT)
and Terramycin (TM) Oph. Oint.
START : Ponstan  Blistering
TM  Filling ointment
STOP : Product disposition by QA
Exclude : Batch with deviation and validation
3
Project Goal
PROJECT GOAL METRIC BASELINE* CURRENT GOAL
Reduction of
packaging lead time
(LT)
Working Days Ponstan I:
Average 53
TM Oph II:
Average 26
TBD Ponstan*:
Max 20 days/
batch
TM Oph*:
Max 25 days/
batch
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
I Data collected from lot released in Jul 2007 to Jan 2008.
II Data collected from lot released in Feb 2007 to Feb 2008
* Maximum exclude validation batch and deviation
4
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
Process Map
Packaging Flow of Ponstan 500 mg FCT (As Is)
Pack into Multicarton
Released
coated
tablets
Pack into Shipper
Folding Leaflet
Printing Multicarton
Folded
leaflet
Printed
multicarton
B
Yes
No
Blistering
Inspection on
defects
Export
product?
Pack into Export
shipper
5
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
Process Map
Batch Record Process of Ponstan 500 mg FCT (As Is)
TL calculate product
yield & accountability
B
TL
Completion in MAPS
by TL
Prod. Admin review
batch record for doc.
error
Yes
Admin
Prod Spv
Ok? No
TL/ Operator/
Inspector
Record data in the
log book of doc error
Prod Spv review and
sign off the batch record
Prod Manager
Prod Manager review
and sign-off the batch
record
Ok?
Yes
Yes
No
QA Spv review and
sign-off the batch
record
Quality Assurance
Profiles (QAP)
Ok?
Yes
Disposition in
MAPS
Ok?
Yes
Create CoA
QA Manager review
and sign-off the batch
record
Ok? No
Prod Manager/
Inspector/ Lab
Manager
No
Prod. Manager/
QA Spv
QA Spv
QA Manager
Review Batch record = Manufacturing + Packaging batch record
6
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
Process Map
Packaging Flow of TM Oph. Oint. (As Is)
Final
blend
Sampling for Lab
Test
Testing
Gamma radiation
Irradiated
products
Cartoning
A
Folding Leaflet
Printing
Multicarton
Folded
leaflet
Printed
multicarton
Packing for Gamma
radiation
Inspection on
defect
Yes
Inspection on
defect
Filling
Market: Korea?
Pack into
Shipper
No
Pack into
Multicarton
Shrink wrapping
Testing
Sampling for
Micro Test
Pack into
Shipper
7
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
Process Map
Batch Record Process of TM Oph. Oint. (As Is)
Review Batch record = Manufacturing + Packaging batch record
TL calculate product
yield & accountability
B
TL
Completion in MAPS
by TL
Yes
Admin
Prod Spv
Ok?
No
TL/ Operator/
Inspector
Record data in the
log book of doc error
Prod. Admin review
batch record for doc.
error
Prod Manager
Prod Manager review
and sign-off the batch
record
Ok?
Yes
Yes
No
QA Spv review and
sign-off the batch
record
Quality Assurance
Profiles (QAP)
Ok?
Yes
Disposition in
MAPS
Ok?
Yes
Create CoA
QA Manager review
and sign-off the batch
record
Ok? No
Prod Manager/
Inspector/ Lab
Manager
No
Prod. Manager/
QA Spv
QA Spv
QA Manager
Prod Spv review and
sign off the batch record
8
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
DATA PLOT PONSTAN 500 MG FCT
Total manufacturing lead time ranges from 59 to 99 days with median of 77 days.
Production process LT ranges from 17 to 37 days with median of 25 days.
Packaging to disposition LT ranges from 38 to 77 days with average of 52 days
which contributes 68% to the total LT.
Total Manufacturing LT = Production LT + Packaging to disposition LT
729-30164
729-30158
729-30152
729-30146
729-30137
729-30129
729-30123
729-30112
729-30099
729-30045
729-30038
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Lot No
Days
Med: 25
Avg: 52
Med: 77
Production LT
Packaging LT
Total Manufacturing LT
Variable
Time Series Plot of Production LT, Packaging LT, and Total Manufacturing LT
9
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
DATA PLOT PONSTAN 500 MG FCT
729-30164
729-30158
729-30152
729-30146
729-30137
729-30129
729-30123
729-30112
729-30099
729-30045
729-30038
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Lot No
Lead
Time
(Working
Days)
Med: 2
Avg: 50
Avg: 53
Packaging Lead Time
Final Review Lead Time
Total LT (Pack-Disposition)
Variable
Time Series Plot of Packaging, Final Review, and Total LT (Pack - Disposition)
Total lead time ranges from 38 to 77 days with average of 53 days.
Packaging process LT ranges from 1 to 12 days with median of 2 days.
Final review LT ranges from 35 to 75 days with average of 50 days
which contributes 94% to the total LT.
LT (Pack – Disposition) = Packaging LT + Final review LT
10
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
DATA PLOT PONSTAN 500 MG FCT
79% of the total review LT is contributed by the production review time.
Production review LT ranges from 26 – 58 days with average of 39 days.
QA review LT ranges from 1 – 28 days with average of 10 days.
Total Final Review LT
QA Review LT
Production Review LT
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Days
38.8333
10.4833
49.5
Boxplot of Production Review LT and QA Review LT
11
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
DATA PLOT TM Oph. Oint.
Total Manufacturing LT = Production LT + Packaging to disposition LT
8-52001
7-52050
7-52042
7-52034
7-52030
7-52026
7-52023
7-52020
7-52010
7-52005
50
40
30
20
10
0
Lot No
Days
Med: 3
Avg: 27
Avg: 30
Production LT
Packaging LT
Total Manufacturing LT
Variable
Time Series Plot of Production LT, Packaging LT, Total Manufacturing LT
Total manufacturing lead time ranges from 2 to 7 days with average of 30 days.
Production process LT ranges from 14 to 45 days with median of 3 days.
Packaging to disposition LT ranges from 17 to 48 days with average of 27 days
which contributes 90% to the total LT.
12
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
DATA PLOT TM Oph. Oint.
Total LT ranges from 14 to 45 days with average of 26 days.
Packaging LT ranges from 6 to 21 days with median of 10 days.
Final review lead time ranges from 5 to 30 days with average of 16 days
which contributes 62% to the total LT.
8-52001
7-52050
7-52042
7-52034
7-52030
7-52026
7-52023
7-52020
7-52010
7-52005
50
40
30
20
10
0
Lot No
Lead
Time
(Working
Days)
Avg: 26
Avg: 16
Med: 10
Packaging LT_1
Final Rev iew LT_1
Total LT (Pack - Disposition)_1
V ariable
Time Series Plot of Packaging, Final Review, and Total LT (Pack - Disposition)
LT (Pack – Disposition) = Packaging LT + Final review LT
13
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
DATA PLOT TM Oph. Oint.
Production review time ranges from 1 – 18 days with average of 8 days.
QA review lead time ranges from 1 – 25 days with average of 8 days.
Total Final Review LT
QA Review LT
Production Review LT
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Days
7.84375 8.125
16.0938
Boxplot of Production Review LT and QA Review LT
CAPABILITY ANALYSIS
14
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
100% of the batches cannot meet the lead time of max 20 days.
Data is approx. normal
70
60
50
40
30
20
USL
LSL *
Target *
USL 20
Sample Mean 52.3
Sample N 60
StDev (O v erall) 6.89461
Process Data
Pp *
PPL *
PPU -1.56
Ppk -1.56
C pm *
O v erall C apability
% < LSL *
% > USL 100.00
% Total 100.00
O bserv ed Performance
% < LSL *
% > USL 100.00
% Total 100.00
Exp. O v erall Performance
Process Capability of Packaging Lead Time of Ponstan 500 mg FCT
CAPABILITY ANALYSIS
15
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
40
32
24
16
8
USL
LSL *
Target *
USL 25
Sample Mean 26.6875
Sample N 32
StDev (O v erall) 8.05801
Process Data
Pp *
PPL *
PPU -0.07
Ppk -0.07
C pm *
O v erall C apability
% < LSL *
% > USL 50.00
% Total 50.00
O bserv ed Performance
% < LSL *
% > USL 58.29
% Total 58.29
Exp. O v erall Performance
Process Capability of Packaging Lead Time of TM Oph Oint
58% of the batches cannot meet the lead time of max 25 days.
Data is approx. normal
16
Value Stream Map Analysis (Ponstan 500 mg FCT)
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
Total Packaging Lead Time ranges from 24 – 29 days.
Total processing time (P/T) ranges from 3 – 3.5 days (23 – 26 hours)
Total delay time ranges from 21 – 26 days. Delay time was 89% of total LT
Processing time in batch record review ranges from 6 – 8 hours per batch with delay time
19 - 24 days. Delay time in review process needs to be minimized.
Note: Data taken from measurement of 3 batches
Printing
Multicarton
Folding Leaflet
Blistering
Completion
by TL
Review by
Production
Secondary
Packing
I
I I I I
Review &
Disposition by QA
Warehouse
Production -
Process
Warehouse
PT: 8 – 9 hours
LT: 1 WD
PT: 6 – 8 hours
LT: 1 WD
PT: 0.5 hours
LT: 1 WD
PT: 4 – 7 hours
LT: 17 - 21 WD
PT: 1 – 2 hours
LT: 2 - 3 WD
PT: 1.5 - 2 hours PT: 0.5 hours
0 WD
0
0 – 1 WD 2 WD 1 - 4 WD
17
Value Stream Map Analysis (TM Oph Oint)
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
Total Packaging Lead Time ranges from 22 - 33 days.
Total processing time (P/T) ranges from 15 – 18 days (113 – 134 hours )
Total delay time ranges from 6 - 15 days (45 – 113 hours). Delay time was 37% of total LT.
Processing time in batch record review ranges from 7 – 10 hours per batch with delay time
2 – 10 working days. Delay time in review process needs to be minimized.
Note: Data taken from measurement of 3 batches
Filling & Packing
for Radiation
8
I
Gamma
Radiation
Printing
carton
2
Completion
by TL
1
Review by
Production
3
Secondary
Packing
8
I
I
I
I I
Review &
Disposition by
QA
2
PT: 22.5 – 25 hours PT: 2 – 3 WD
Lab Testing
(Chem&Micro)
5
Production -
Process
Warehouse
Lab Testing
(Chemical)
2
Folding
Leaflet
1
0 - 2 1 - 2
Inspection on
defects
6
I
I
PT: 2 WD
0
PT: 4 - 5 WD
1 - 2
PT: 3.5 – 6 WH
0 - 5
PT: 6 - 9 WH
0 - 1
PT: 1.5 WH
LT: 3 WD LT: 3 - 4 WD LT: 5 – 6 WD
LT: 2 – 5 WD LT: 4 – 5 WD LT: 1 - 2 WD LT: 1 - 8 WD
PT: 7.5 – 8.5 hours
LT: 1 - 2 WD
PT: 4.5 – 7 hours
LT: 2 WD
Warehouse
PT: 2 hours PT: 14.3 hours
18
Brainstorming
Why batch record review lead time is too long?
1. Structure and content of batch record is not user friendly/
complicated
2. Effort and time needed for correcting documentation errors
3. Flow of batch record review process is not efficient. Review level
that is labor intensive involving several personnel. The overall
documents of the batch record from manufacturing to packaging
is reviewed at the end of the process.
4. Standard lead time for batch record review and product release is
not clearly defined. Delay time during final review is high.
5. Batch record is accumulated waiting for review and sent to QA
including waiting time for approved QAP for TM Oph. Oint.
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
19
Batch record is accumulated waiting for review and sent to QA
Numbers of Batch Record sent to QA per month was variable
ranges from 1 – 23 batch records per receiving day with median of 5/ day.
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
23-May-08
7-May-08
21-Apr-08
9-Apr-08
26-M
ar-08
10-M
ar-08
21-Feb-08
11-Feb-08
17-Jan-08
3-Jan-08
25
20
15
10
5
0
Date
No
of
Batch
Records
Med=5
Time Series Plot of No of Batch Records to QA per day
20
Waiting time for QAP Availability
The QA review lead time, which ranges from 1 – 25 days, includes the waiting
lead time for QAP from lab. QAP LT ranges from -19 to 11 days.
Minus value means that the QAP has been received prior to the batch records sent to QA.
8-52004
7-52056
7-52049
7-52035
7-52031
7-52028
(MA
L)
7-52024
7-52021
7-52010
7-52005
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
Lot No
Days QAP LT
QA review LT
Variable
Time Series Plot of QAP LT & QA Review LT
QAP LT = Batch record receive date – QAP receive date
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
21
Improvement Matrix
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
Potential X’s Proposed Solution Supporting Data
Structure and content of batch
record is not user friendly/
complicated: Excessive data
entries, excessive signatures,
Many separate forms are linked
to the batch record for data
recording.
Excessive data verification
during IPC between Production
and QA
Re-structure of batch record both
contents and format. The content is
also analyzed and some
improvements are made to comply
with PQS & regulatory
requirements.
Some of IPC activities and data
verification will be transferred from
QA to Production as per risk
assessment.
QA Risk assessment:
New IPC matrix:
Numbers of signatures for the
new format of batch packaging
records are reduced by approx.
50% (Ponstan FCT: 52%; TM
Oph: 58%)
22
Improvement Matrix
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
Potential X’s Proposed Solution Supporting Data
Documentation error - Re-structure batch record as above.
- Training Operator on documentation
practice for the new batch record
-
Flow of batch record review
process is not efficient. Review
level that is labor intensive
involving several personnel. The
overall documents of the batch
record from manufacturing to
packaging is reviewed at the end
of the process
New flow of packaging process
including IPC and batch record review
process:
- Batch record will be reviewed at each
defined stage.
- Reviewers include Prod Spv, Prod
Manager, QA Spv, QA Manager 
Delete non-value-added activity i.e.,
Prod Admin function to check and
record doc error. These functions will
be integrated to all reviewers.
See proposal of new flow
in the next slides.
23
Improvement Matrix
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
Potential X’s Proposed Solution Supporting Data
Waiting time for approved QAP of
TM Oph Oint
The Lab Spv will also sign off the
batch record at each stage (Before
radiation & after radiation) to confirm
whether the test result meet or
doesn’t meet spec. The QAP will be
inserted into the batch record after the
Lab Spv sign off the BR at the after
radiation stage, then the batch record
will be circulated to the Prod and QA
Manager for final approval. This avoid
the delay due to QAP documentation.
-
Batch record is accumulated waiting
for review and sent to QA.
Define standard lead time for review:
1) Review at each stage: Max 1
business day per reviewer per batch.
2) Final review: : Max 2 business day
per reviewer per batch.
-
Standard lead time for batch record
review and product release is not
clearly defined. Delay time during
final review is high.
24
Proposal for New Process Flow
Off-Line Printing
Printing
Examination & approval
of printed multicarton
sample
Verification by QA
Inspector
PM Reconciliation
Printing Inspection
Review dan approval
printing process by Prod
Spv
Batch packaging
records – Printing
stage
Warehouse Packaging
Line clearance
Printed
Multicarton
Multicarton
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
25
Proposal for New Process Flow
Folding Leaflet
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
Folding
Examination & approval
of folded leaflet sample
PM reconciliation
Review dan approval
folding process by Prod
Spv
Batch packaging
records – Folding
stage
Warehouse Packaging
Line clearance
Folded
leaflet
Leaflet
26
Proposal for New Process Flow
Filling & Packaging of TM Oph Oint 3.5 g Korea
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
Final
blend
Compounding
Line Clearance Filling Packing for radiation
Inspection on defect
of filled alutubes
Gamma Radiation
Radiated
products
Inspection on
defect
Packing into carton
Packing into
Multicarton
Shrink wrapping
Packing into export
shipper
Finished
Products
PPIC
I
Examination &
approval of sample of
embossed empty tube
Verification by QA
Inspector
Start-Up
Inspection on filled
weight, foreign matter,
blend homogeneity,
and leak test
Inspection on
embossed lot no &
exp date End of Run
Check
Inspection on
defects
Sampling
Lab Testing
(Chemical)
Folded
leaflet
Printed
Multicarton
Sampling
Lab Testing
(Chemical & Micro)
Reconciliation
Batch record review
& disposition
Batch record review
and approval (Filling
stage)
A
B
Examination &
approval of
embossed carton
Inspection on
embossed lot no &
exp date
Start up (30 carton)
End of Run Check
(30 carton)
Weight monitoring
of carton,
multicarton, shipper
Verification by QA
Inspector
Inspection on
cartoning results
Examination &
approval of shipper
label
Inspection on product
& packaging defects
(ROI)
27
Proposal for New Process Flow
TM Oph Oint 3.5 g Batch Record Review Process
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
Yes
A
Ok?
Prod Spv
TL/ Operator/
Inspector
No
Prod. Spv review and
sign-off the batch
record
Lab Spv
Lab Spv sign off the
batch record
QA Spv
Ok? Yes
Prod Spv
No
Approved batch
packaging record
(filling stage)
QA Spv review and
sign-off the batch
record
Yes
B
Ok?
Prod Spv
TL/ Operator/
Inspector
No
Prod. Spv review and
sign-off the batch
record
Lab Spv
Lab Spv sign off the
batch record
Ok?
Yes
Prod Spv
No
Completion in
MAPS
TL/ Prod Spv
Production Manager
review and sign-off
the batch record
QA Manager review
and sign off the batch
record
Ok?
Prod Manager
QA Manager
Approved batch
packaging record Yes
No
Prod Manager
Disposition in MAPS
28
Proposal for New Process Flow
Blistering & Packaging of Ponstan 500 mg FCT
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
Coated
Tablet
Coating
Line Clearance Blistering
Finished
Products
PPIC
Examination &
approval of sample of
embossed empty
blister
Verification by QA
Inspector
Leak Test
Inspection on
embossed lot no and
exp date
Inspection on
blister defects
Printed
Multicarton
Batch record review
and disposition
Packing into
multicarton
Packing into export
shipper
Reconciliation
Examination &
approval of shipper
label
Folded
leaflet
Inspection on product
and packing defect
(ROI)
End of Run Check
Weight monitoring of
multicarton
Start-Up
A
29
Proposal for New Process Flow
Ponstan 500 mg FCT Batch Record Review Process
Control
Improve
Analyze
Measure
Define
Yes
A
Ok?
Prod Spv
TL/ Operator/
Inspector
No
Prod. Spv review and
sign-off the batch
record
Ok?
Yes
Prod Spv
No
Completion in
MAPS
TL/ Prod Spv
QA Manager review
and sign off the batch
record
Ok?
Prod Manager
QA Manager
Approved batch
packaging record Yes
No
Prod Manager
Disposition in MAPS
Production Manager
review and sign-off the
batch record

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a product-review.ppt

UTC Aerospace System - Value Stream Mapping
UTC Aerospace System - Value Stream MappingUTC Aerospace System - Value Stream Mapping
UTC Aerospace System - Value Stream MappingLean6Sigma4all
 
six-sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory.ppt
six-sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory.pptsix-sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory.ppt
six-sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory.pptMuniyappanT
 
Blackbeltpresentation
BlackbeltpresentationBlackbeltpresentation
BlackbeltpresentationRobert Peth
 
Test Metrics
Test MetricsTest Metrics
Test MetricsDevukjs
 
Total Quality Management (TQM)
Total Quality Management (TQM)Total Quality Management (TQM)
Total Quality Management (TQM)Rakesh Chaudhary
 
6Six sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory (2)
6Six sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory (2)6Six sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory (2)
6Six sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory (2)Bibhuti Prasad Nanda
 
CASE STUDY ON IMPLEMENTATION OF KAIZEN AND 5S TECHNIQUES IN SMALL MANUFACTURI...
CASE STUDY ON IMPLEMENTATION OF KAIZEN AND 5S TECHNIQUES IN SMALL MANUFACTURI...CASE STUDY ON IMPLEMENTATION OF KAIZEN AND 5S TECHNIQUES IN SMALL MANUFACTURI...
CASE STUDY ON IMPLEMENTATION OF KAIZEN AND 5S TECHNIQUES IN SMALL MANUFACTURI...Shubhangi Gurway
 
Enforcement from the Inside: Improving Quality of Business in Process Management
Enforcement from the Inside: Improving Quality of Business in Process ManagementEnforcement from the Inside: Improving Quality of Business in Process Management
Enforcement from the Inside: Improving Quality of Business in Process ManagementTobias Unger
 
Production & Operarions Management Compre Review
Production & Operarions Management Compre ReviewProduction & Operarions Management Compre Review
Production & Operarions Management Compre ReviewRamon Fernandez, MBA
 
Gurnoor Technical Trainee Review 2011-2012 Final
Gurnoor Technical Trainee Review 2011-2012 FinalGurnoor Technical Trainee Review 2011-2012 Final
Gurnoor Technical Trainee Review 2011-2012 FinalGurnoor Singh Kakkar
 
Six sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory (2)
Six sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory (2)Six sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory (2)
Six sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory (2)Bibhuti Prasad Nanda
 
A case study on productivity improvement of wearing insert and cutting ring
A case study on productivity improvement of wearing insert and cutting ringA case study on productivity improvement of wearing insert and cutting ring
A case study on productivity improvement of wearing insert and cutting ringIJECSJournal
 
Overview of 3 day Lean & Kaizen Course Content
Overview of 3 day Lean & Kaizen Course ContentOverview of 3 day Lean & Kaizen Course Content
Overview of 3 day Lean & Kaizen Course ContentTimothy Wooi
 
Innovation Proj PVC Paste TeraHertz
Innovation Proj PVC Paste TeraHertzInnovation Proj PVC Paste TeraHertz
Innovation Proj PVC Paste TeraHertzRaymond Shen
 
Finishing Manual Lithe Group.pdf
Finishing Manual Lithe Group.pdfFinishing Manual Lithe Group.pdf
Finishing Manual Lithe Group.pdfMizan Rahman
 

Semelhante a product-review.ppt (20)

UTC Aerospace System - Value Stream Mapping
UTC Aerospace System - Value Stream MappingUTC Aerospace System - Value Stream Mapping
UTC Aerospace System - Value Stream Mapping
 
Lean Value Stream Mapping Project
Lean Value Stream Mapping ProjectLean Value Stream Mapping Project
Lean Value Stream Mapping Project
 
Lean Assessment 03-09-11
Lean Assessment 03-09-11Lean Assessment 03-09-11
Lean Assessment 03-09-11
 
six-sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory.ppt
six-sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory.pptsix-sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory.ppt
six-sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory.ppt
 
Blackbeltpresentation
BlackbeltpresentationBlackbeltpresentation
Blackbeltpresentation
 
Test Metrics
Test MetricsTest Metrics
Test Metrics
 
Total Quality Management (TQM)
Total Quality Management (TQM)Total Quality Management (TQM)
Total Quality Management (TQM)
 
QA/QC
QA/QCQA/QC
QA/QC
 
6Six sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory (2)
6Six sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory (2)6Six sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory (2)
6Six sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory (2)
 
CASE STUDY ON IMPLEMENTATION OF KAIZEN AND 5S TECHNIQUES IN SMALL MANUFACTURI...
CASE STUDY ON IMPLEMENTATION OF KAIZEN AND 5S TECHNIQUES IN SMALL MANUFACTURI...CASE STUDY ON IMPLEMENTATION OF KAIZEN AND 5S TECHNIQUES IN SMALL MANUFACTURI...
CASE STUDY ON IMPLEMENTATION OF KAIZEN AND 5S TECHNIQUES IN SMALL MANUFACTURI...
 
Enforcement from the Inside: Improving Quality of Business in Process Management
Enforcement from the Inside: Improving Quality of Business in Process ManagementEnforcement from the Inside: Improving Quality of Business in Process Management
Enforcement from the Inside: Improving Quality of Business in Process Management
 
Production & Operarions Management Compre Review
Production & Operarions Management Compre ReviewProduction & Operarions Management Compre Review
Production & Operarions Management Compre Review
 
5 Steps to implementing Lean
5  Steps to implementing Lean5  Steps to implementing Lean
5 Steps to implementing Lean
 
Gurnoor Technical Trainee Review 2011-2012 Final
Gurnoor Technical Trainee Review 2011-2012 FinalGurnoor Technical Trainee Review 2011-2012 Final
Gurnoor Technical Trainee Review 2011-2012 Final
 
Log11 uitwerking opdrachten
Log11 uitwerking opdrachtenLog11 uitwerking opdrachten
Log11 uitwerking opdrachten
 
Six sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory (2)
Six sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory (2)Six sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory (2)
Six sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory (2)
 
A case study on productivity improvement of wearing insert and cutting ring
A case study on productivity improvement of wearing insert and cutting ringA case study on productivity improvement of wearing insert and cutting ring
A case study on productivity improvement of wearing insert and cutting ring
 
Overview of 3 day Lean & Kaizen Course Content
Overview of 3 day Lean & Kaizen Course ContentOverview of 3 day Lean & Kaizen Course Content
Overview of 3 day Lean & Kaizen Course Content
 
Innovation Proj PVC Paste TeraHertz
Innovation Proj PVC Paste TeraHertzInnovation Proj PVC Paste TeraHertz
Innovation Proj PVC Paste TeraHertz
 
Finishing Manual Lithe Group.pdf
Finishing Manual Lithe Group.pdfFinishing Manual Lithe Group.pdf
Finishing Manual Lithe Group.pdf
 

Último

International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...ssuserf63bd7
 
Youth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu Menza
Youth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu MenzaYouth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu Menza
Youth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu Menzaictsugar
 
Annual General Meeting Presentation Slides
Annual General Meeting Presentation SlidesAnnual General Meeting Presentation Slides
Annual General Meeting Presentation SlidesKeppelCorporation
 
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy CheruiyotInvestment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyotictsugar
 
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfIntro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfpollardmorgan
 
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdfAPRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdfRbc Rbcua
 
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deckPitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deckHajeJanKamps
 
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...Seta Wicaksana
 
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City GurgaonCall Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaoncallgirls2057
 
Call Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / Ncr
Call Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / NcrCall Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / Ncr
Call Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / Ncrdollysharma2066
 
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis UsageNeil Kimberley
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample ReportIndia Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample ReportMintel Group
 
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detailCase study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detailAriel592675
 
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort ServiceCall US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Servicecallgirls2057
 
Global Scenario On Sustainable and Resilient Coconut Industry by Dr. Jelfina...
Global Scenario On Sustainable  and Resilient Coconut Industry by Dr. Jelfina...Global Scenario On Sustainable  and Resilient Coconut Industry by Dr. Jelfina...
Global Scenario On Sustainable and Resilient Coconut Industry by Dr. Jelfina...ictsugar
 
IoT Insurance Observatory: summary 2024
IoT Insurance Observatory:  summary 2024IoT Insurance Observatory:  summary 2024
IoT Insurance Observatory: summary 2024Matteo Carbone
 
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent ChirchirMarketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchirictsugar
 

Último (20)

International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
 
Youth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu Menza
Youth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu MenzaYouth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu Menza
Youth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu Menza
 
Annual General Meeting Presentation Slides
Annual General Meeting Presentation SlidesAnnual General Meeting Presentation Slides
Annual General Meeting Presentation Slides
 
Enjoy ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida Escorts Delhi NCR
Enjoy ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida Escorts Delhi NCREnjoy ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida Escorts Delhi NCR
Enjoy ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida Escorts Delhi NCR
 
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy CheruiyotInvestment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
 
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfIntro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
 
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdfAPRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
 
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deckPitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
 
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
 
Corporate Profile 47Billion Information Technology
Corporate Profile 47Billion Information TechnologyCorporate Profile 47Billion Information Technology
Corporate Profile 47Billion Information Technology
 
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City GurgaonCall Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
 
Call Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / Ncr
Call Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / NcrCall Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / Ncr
Call Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / Ncr
 
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
 
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample ReportIndia Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
 
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detailCase study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
 
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort ServiceCall US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
 
Global Scenario On Sustainable and Resilient Coconut Industry by Dr. Jelfina...
Global Scenario On Sustainable  and Resilient Coconut Industry by Dr. Jelfina...Global Scenario On Sustainable  and Resilient Coconut Industry by Dr. Jelfina...
Global Scenario On Sustainable and Resilient Coconut Industry by Dr. Jelfina...
 
IoT Insurance Observatory: summary 2024
IoT Insurance Observatory:  summary 2024IoT Insurance Observatory:  summary 2024
IoT Insurance Observatory: summary 2024
 
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent ChirchirMarketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
 

product-review.ppt

  • 1. 0 Right First Time Six Sigma Project “Improve batch record system for Packaging ” Start Date: 01 Feb 2008 Black Belt: Marina Suryanto Sponsor: Sis Mardini (QO Manager) Process Owner: Raharsih Basrodin (Production) Team Members: Production: Lily, Yaseph, Lely QA: S. Wigati, Yodi, Melissa I-nexus ID: 3,031
  • 2. 1 Control Improve Analyze Measure Define The lead time to manufacture to release is too long. Problem Statement Business Case Expected business results: • Reliable supply of product • Improve quality of records • Reduce time and efforts needed to complete batch documentation
  • 3. 2 Scope Control Improve Analyze Measure Define The lead time to manufacture comprises of 2 parts i.e: 1. Raw material receipt to bulk film coated tablet and final blend release (Project INX 7724 by JTM) 2. Primary packaging to product disposition Product : Ponstan 500 mg Film Coated Tablet (FCT) and Terramycin (TM) Oph. Oint. START : Ponstan  Blistering TM  Filling ointment STOP : Product disposition by QA Exclude : Batch with deviation and validation
  • 4. 3 Project Goal PROJECT GOAL METRIC BASELINE* CURRENT GOAL Reduction of packaging lead time (LT) Working Days Ponstan I: Average 53 TM Oph II: Average 26 TBD Ponstan*: Max 20 days/ batch TM Oph*: Max 25 days/ batch Control Improve Analyze Measure Define I Data collected from lot released in Jul 2007 to Jan 2008. II Data collected from lot released in Feb 2007 to Feb 2008 * Maximum exclude validation batch and deviation
  • 5. 4 Control Improve Analyze Measure Define Process Map Packaging Flow of Ponstan 500 mg FCT (As Is) Pack into Multicarton Released coated tablets Pack into Shipper Folding Leaflet Printing Multicarton Folded leaflet Printed multicarton B Yes No Blistering Inspection on defects Export product? Pack into Export shipper
  • 6. 5 Control Improve Analyze Measure Define Process Map Batch Record Process of Ponstan 500 mg FCT (As Is) TL calculate product yield & accountability B TL Completion in MAPS by TL Prod. Admin review batch record for doc. error Yes Admin Prod Spv Ok? No TL/ Operator/ Inspector Record data in the log book of doc error Prod Spv review and sign off the batch record Prod Manager Prod Manager review and sign-off the batch record Ok? Yes Yes No QA Spv review and sign-off the batch record Quality Assurance Profiles (QAP) Ok? Yes Disposition in MAPS Ok? Yes Create CoA QA Manager review and sign-off the batch record Ok? No Prod Manager/ Inspector/ Lab Manager No Prod. Manager/ QA Spv QA Spv QA Manager Review Batch record = Manufacturing + Packaging batch record
  • 7. 6 Control Improve Analyze Measure Define Process Map Packaging Flow of TM Oph. Oint. (As Is) Final blend Sampling for Lab Test Testing Gamma radiation Irradiated products Cartoning A Folding Leaflet Printing Multicarton Folded leaflet Printed multicarton Packing for Gamma radiation Inspection on defect Yes Inspection on defect Filling Market: Korea? Pack into Shipper No Pack into Multicarton Shrink wrapping Testing Sampling for Micro Test Pack into Shipper
  • 8. 7 Control Improve Analyze Measure Define Process Map Batch Record Process of TM Oph. Oint. (As Is) Review Batch record = Manufacturing + Packaging batch record TL calculate product yield & accountability B TL Completion in MAPS by TL Yes Admin Prod Spv Ok? No TL/ Operator/ Inspector Record data in the log book of doc error Prod. Admin review batch record for doc. error Prod Manager Prod Manager review and sign-off the batch record Ok? Yes Yes No QA Spv review and sign-off the batch record Quality Assurance Profiles (QAP) Ok? Yes Disposition in MAPS Ok? Yes Create CoA QA Manager review and sign-off the batch record Ok? No Prod Manager/ Inspector/ Lab Manager No Prod. Manager/ QA Spv QA Spv QA Manager Prod Spv review and sign off the batch record
  • 9. 8 Control Improve Analyze Measure Define DATA PLOT PONSTAN 500 MG FCT Total manufacturing lead time ranges from 59 to 99 days with median of 77 days. Production process LT ranges from 17 to 37 days with median of 25 days. Packaging to disposition LT ranges from 38 to 77 days with average of 52 days which contributes 68% to the total LT. Total Manufacturing LT = Production LT + Packaging to disposition LT 729-30164 729-30158 729-30152 729-30146 729-30137 729-30129 729-30123 729-30112 729-30099 729-30045 729-30038 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Lot No Days Med: 25 Avg: 52 Med: 77 Production LT Packaging LT Total Manufacturing LT Variable Time Series Plot of Production LT, Packaging LT, and Total Manufacturing LT
  • 10. 9 Control Improve Analyze Measure Define DATA PLOT PONSTAN 500 MG FCT 729-30164 729-30158 729-30152 729-30146 729-30137 729-30129 729-30123 729-30112 729-30099 729-30045 729-30038 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Lot No Lead Time (Working Days) Med: 2 Avg: 50 Avg: 53 Packaging Lead Time Final Review Lead Time Total LT (Pack-Disposition) Variable Time Series Plot of Packaging, Final Review, and Total LT (Pack - Disposition) Total lead time ranges from 38 to 77 days with average of 53 days. Packaging process LT ranges from 1 to 12 days with median of 2 days. Final review LT ranges from 35 to 75 days with average of 50 days which contributes 94% to the total LT. LT (Pack – Disposition) = Packaging LT + Final review LT
  • 11. 10 Control Improve Analyze Measure Define DATA PLOT PONSTAN 500 MG FCT 79% of the total review LT is contributed by the production review time. Production review LT ranges from 26 – 58 days with average of 39 days. QA review LT ranges from 1 – 28 days with average of 10 days. Total Final Review LT QA Review LT Production Review LT 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Days 38.8333 10.4833 49.5 Boxplot of Production Review LT and QA Review LT
  • 12. 11 Control Improve Analyze Measure Define DATA PLOT TM Oph. Oint. Total Manufacturing LT = Production LT + Packaging to disposition LT 8-52001 7-52050 7-52042 7-52034 7-52030 7-52026 7-52023 7-52020 7-52010 7-52005 50 40 30 20 10 0 Lot No Days Med: 3 Avg: 27 Avg: 30 Production LT Packaging LT Total Manufacturing LT Variable Time Series Plot of Production LT, Packaging LT, Total Manufacturing LT Total manufacturing lead time ranges from 2 to 7 days with average of 30 days. Production process LT ranges from 14 to 45 days with median of 3 days. Packaging to disposition LT ranges from 17 to 48 days with average of 27 days which contributes 90% to the total LT.
  • 13. 12 Control Improve Analyze Measure Define DATA PLOT TM Oph. Oint. Total LT ranges from 14 to 45 days with average of 26 days. Packaging LT ranges from 6 to 21 days with median of 10 days. Final review lead time ranges from 5 to 30 days with average of 16 days which contributes 62% to the total LT. 8-52001 7-52050 7-52042 7-52034 7-52030 7-52026 7-52023 7-52020 7-52010 7-52005 50 40 30 20 10 0 Lot No Lead Time (Working Days) Avg: 26 Avg: 16 Med: 10 Packaging LT_1 Final Rev iew LT_1 Total LT (Pack - Disposition)_1 V ariable Time Series Plot of Packaging, Final Review, and Total LT (Pack - Disposition) LT (Pack – Disposition) = Packaging LT + Final review LT
  • 14. 13 Control Improve Analyze Measure Define DATA PLOT TM Oph. Oint. Production review time ranges from 1 – 18 days with average of 8 days. QA review lead time ranges from 1 – 25 days with average of 8 days. Total Final Review LT QA Review LT Production Review LT 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Days 7.84375 8.125 16.0938 Boxplot of Production Review LT and QA Review LT
  • 15. CAPABILITY ANALYSIS 14 Control Improve Analyze Measure Define 100% of the batches cannot meet the lead time of max 20 days. Data is approx. normal 70 60 50 40 30 20 USL LSL * Target * USL 20 Sample Mean 52.3 Sample N 60 StDev (O v erall) 6.89461 Process Data Pp * PPL * PPU -1.56 Ppk -1.56 C pm * O v erall C apability % < LSL * % > USL 100.00 % Total 100.00 O bserv ed Performance % < LSL * % > USL 100.00 % Total 100.00 Exp. O v erall Performance Process Capability of Packaging Lead Time of Ponstan 500 mg FCT
  • 16. CAPABILITY ANALYSIS 15 Control Improve Analyze Measure Define 40 32 24 16 8 USL LSL * Target * USL 25 Sample Mean 26.6875 Sample N 32 StDev (O v erall) 8.05801 Process Data Pp * PPL * PPU -0.07 Ppk -0.07 C pm * O v erall C apability % < LSL * % > USL 50.00 % Total 50.00 O bserv ed Performance % < LSL * % > USL 58.29 % Total 58.29 Exp. O v erall Performance Process Capability of Packaging Lead Time of TM Oph Oint 58% of the batches cannot meet the lead time of max 25 days. Data is approx. normal
  • 17. 16 Value Stream Map Analysis (Ponstan 500 mg FCT) Control Improve Analyze Measure Define Total Packaging Lead Time ranges from 24 – 29 days. Total processing time (P/T) ranges from 3 – 3.5 days (23 – 26 hours) Total delay time ranges from 21 – 26 days. Delay time was 89% of total LT Processing time in batch record review ranges from 6 – 8 hours per batch with delay time 19 - 24 days. Delay time in review process needs to be minimized. Note: Data taken from measurement of 3 batches Printing Multicarton Folding Leaflet Blistering Completion by TL Review by Production Secondary Packing I I I I I Review & Disposition by QA Warehouse Production - Process Warehouse PT: 8 – 9 hours LT: 1 WD PT: 6 – 8 hours LT: 1 WD PT: 0.5 hours LT: 1 WD PT: 4 – 7 hours LT: 17 - 21 WD PT: 1 – 2 hours LT: 2 - 3 WD PT: 1.5 - 2 hours PT: 0.5 hours 0 WD 0 0 – 1 WD 2 WD 1 - 4 WD
  • 18. 17 Value Stream Map Analysis (TM Oph Oint) Control Improve Analyze Measure Define Total Packaging Lead Time ranges from 22 - 33 days. Total processing time (P/T) ranges from 15 – 18 days (113 – 134 hours ) Total delay time ranges from 6 - 15 days (45 – 113 hours). Delay time was 37% of total LT. Processing time in batch record review ranges from 7 – 10 hours per batch with delay time 2 – 10 working days. Delay time in review process needs to be minimized. Note: Data taken from measurement of 3 batches Filling & Packing for Radiation 8 I Gamma Radiation Printing carton 2 Completion by TL 1 Review by Production 3 Secondary Packing 8 I I I I I Review & Disposition by QA 2 PT: 22.5 – 25 hours PT: 2 – 3 WD Lab Testing (Chem&Micro) 5 Production - Process Warehouse Lab Testing (Chemical) 2 Folding Leaflet 1 0 - 2 1 - 2 Inspection on defects 6 I I PT: 2 WD 0 PT: 4 - 5 WD 1 - 2 PT: 3.5 – 6 WH 0 - 5 PT: 6 - 9 WH 0 - 1 PT: 1.5 WH LT: 3 WD LT: 3 - 4 WD LT: 5 – 6 WD LT: 2 – 5 WD LT: 4 – 5 WD LT: 1 - 2 WD LT: 1 - 8 WD PT: 7.5 – 8.5 hours LT: 1 - 2 WD PT: 4.5 – 7 hours LT: 2 WD Warehouse PT: 2 hours PT: 14.3 hours
  • 19. 18 Brainstorming Why batch record review lead time is too long? 1. Structure and content of batch record is not user friendly/ complicated 2. Effort and time needed for correcting documentation errors 3. Flow of batch record review process is not efficient. Review level that is labor intensive involving several personnel. The overall documents of the batch record from manufacturing to packaging is reviewed at the end of the process. 4. Standard lead time for batch record review and product release is not clearly defined. Delay time during final review is high. 5. Batch record is accumulated waiting for review and sent to QA including waiting time for approved QAP for TM Oph. Oint. Control Improve Analyze Measure Define
  • 20. 19 Batch record is accumulated waiting for review and sent to QA Numbers of Batch Record sent to QA per month was variable ranges from 1 – 23 batch records per receiving day with median of 5/ day. Control Improve Analyze Measure Define 23-May-08 7-May-08 21-Apr-08 9-Apr-08 26-M ar-08 10-M ar-08 21-Feb-08 11-Feb-08 17-Jan-08 3-Jan-08 25 20 15 10 5 0 Date No of Batch Records Med=5 Time Series Plot of No of Batch Records to QA per day
  • 21. 20 Waiting time for QAP Availability The QA review lead time, which ranges from 1 – 25 days, includes the waiting lead time for QAP from lab. QAP LT ranges from -19 to 11 days. Minus value means that the QAP has been received prior to the batch records sent to QA. 8-52004 7-52056 7-52049 7-52035 7-52031 7-52028 (MA L) 7-52024 7-52021 7-52010 7-52005 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 Lot No Days QAP LT QA review LT Variable Time Series Plot of QAP LT & QA Review LT QAP LT = Batch record receive date – QAP receive date Control Improve Analyze Measure Define
  • 22. 21 Improvement Matrix Control Improve Analyze Measure Define Potential X’s Proposed Solution Supporting Data Structure and content of batch record is not user friendly/ complicated: Excessive data entries, excessive signatures, Many separate forms are linked to the batch record for data recording. Excessive data verification during IPC between Production and QA Re-structure of batch record both contents and format. The content is also analyzed and some improvements are made to comply with PQS & regulatory requirements. Some of IPC activities and data verification will be transferred from QA to Production as per risk assessment. QA Risk assessment: New IPC matrix: Numbers of signatures for the new format of batch packaging records are reduced by approx. 50% (Ponstan FCT: 52%; TM Oph: 58%)
  • 23. 22 Improvement Matrix Control Improve Analyze Measure Define Potential X’s Proposed Solution Supporting Data Documentation error - Re-structure batch record as above. - Training Operator on documentation practice for the new batch record - Flow of batch record review process is not efficient. Review level that is labor intensive involving several personnel. The overall documents of the batch record from manufacturing to packaging is reviewed at the end of the process New flow of packaging process including IPC and batch record review process: - Batch record will be reviewed at each defined stage. - Reviewers include Prod Spv, Prod Manager, QA Spv, QA Manager  Delete non-value-added activity i.e., Prod Admin function to check and record doc error. These functions will be integrated to all reviewers. See proposal of new flow in the next slides.
  • 24. 23 Improvement Matrix Control Improve Analyze Measure Define Potential X’s Proposed Solution Supporting Data Waiting time for approved QAP of TM Oph Oint The Lab Spv will also sign off the batch record at each stage (Before radiation & after radiation) to confirm whether the test result meet or doesn’t meet spec. The QAP will be inserted into the batch record after the Lab Spv sign off the BR at the after radiation stage, then the batch record will be circulated to the Prod and QA Manager for final approval. This avoid the delay due to QAP documentation. - Batch record is accumulated waiting for review and sent to QA. Define standard lead time for review: 1) Review at each stage: Max 1 business day per reviewer per batch. 2) Final review: : Max 2 business day per reviewer per batch. - Standard lead time for batch record review and product release is not clearly defined. Delay time during final review is high.
  • 25. 24 Proposal for New Process Flow Off-Line Printing Printing Examination & approval of printed multicarton sample Verification by QA Inspector PM Reconciliation Printing Inspection Review dan approval printing process by Prod Spv Batch packaging records – Printing stage Warehouse Packaging Line clearance Printed Multicarton Multicarton Control Improve Analyze Measure Define
  • 26. 25 Proposal for New Process Flow Folding Leaflet Control Improve Analyze Measure Define Folding Examination & approval of folded leaflet sample PM reconciliation Review dan approval folding process by Prod Spv Batch packaging records – Folding stage Warehouse Packaging Line clearance Folded leaflet Leaflet
  • 27. 26 Proposal for New Process Flow Filling & Packaging of TM Oph Oint 3.5 g Korea Control Improve Analyze Measure Define Final blend Compounding Line Clearance Filling Packing for radiation Inspection on defect of filled alutubes Gamma Radiation Radiated products Inspection on defect Packing into carton Packing into Multicarton Shrink wrapping Packing into export shipper Finished Products PPIC I Examination & approval of sample of embossed empty tube Verification by QA Inspector Start-Up Inspection on filled weight, foreign matter, blend homogeneity, and leak test Inspection on embossed lot no & exp date End of Run Check Inspection on defects Sampling Lab Testing (Chemical) Folded leaflet Printed Multicarton Sampling Lab Testing (Chemical & Micro) Reconciliation Batch record review & disposition Batch record review and approval (Filling stage) A B Examination & approval of embossed carton Inspection on embossed lot no & exp date Start up (30 carton) End of Run Check (30 carton) Weight monitoring of carton, multicarton, shipper Verification by QA Inspector Inspection on cartoning results Examination & approval of shipper label Inspection on product & packaging defects (ROI)
  • 28. 27 Proposal for New Process Flow TM Oph Oint 3.5 g Batch Record Review Process Control Improve Analyze Measure Define Yes A Ok? Prod Spv TL/ Operator/ Inspector No Prod. Spv review and sign-off the batch record Lab Spv Lab Spv sign off the batch record QA Spv Ok? Yes Prod Spv No Approved batch packaging record (filling stage) QA Spv review and sign-off the batch record Yes B Ok? Prod Spv TL/ Operator/ Inspector No Prod. Spv review and sign-off the batch record Lab Spv Lab Spv sign off the batch record Ok? Yes Prod Spv No Completion in MAPS TL/ Prod Spv Production Manager review and sign-off the batch record QA Manager review and sign off the batch record Ok? Prod Manager QA Manager Approved batch packaging record Yes No Prod Manager Disposition in MAPS
  • 29. 28 Proposal for New Process Flow Blistering & Packaging of Ponstan 500 mg FCT Control Improve Analyze Measure Define Coated Tablet Coating Line Clearance Blistering Finished Products PPIC Examination & approval of sample of embossed empty blister Verification by QA Inspector Leak Test Inspection on embossed lot no and exp date Inspection on blister defects Printed Multicarton Batch record review and disposition Packing into multicarton Packing into export shipper Reconciliation Examination & approval of shipper label Folded leaflet Inspection on product and packing defect (ROI) End of Run Check Weight monitoring of multicarton Start-Up A
  • 30. 29 Proposal for New Process Flow Ponstan 500 mg FCT Batch Record Review Process Control Improve Analyze Measure Define Yes A Ok? Prod Spv TL/ Operator/ Inspector No Prod. Spv review and sign-off the batch record Ok? Yes Prod Spv No Completion in MAPS TL/ Prod Spv QA Manager review and sign off the batch record Ok? Prod Manager QA Manager Approved batch packaging record Yes No Prod Manager Disposition in MAPS Production Manager review and sign-off the batch record

Notas do Editor

  1. 0
  2. 1