Atualizámos a nossa política de privacidade. Clique aqui para ver os detalhes. Toque aqui para ver os detalhes.
Ative o seu período de avaliaçõo gratuito de 30 dias para desbloquear leituras ilimitadas.
Ative o seu teste gratuito de 30 dias para continuar a ler.
Baixar para ler offline
Module 1 Week 1 Discussion
Christopher Allen posted Feb 11, 2020 4:44 PM
1. How do you think the European case discussed in the video report would be decided in the United States? Why? In the United States there are many laws that help protect against discrimination. These laws cover the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex (U.S. EEOC, n.d). In the United States however, the wear of religious clothing in the workplace can be frowned upon depending on the career choice for safety reasons. Also visibly projecting a particular religion onto others could be a violation of others religious beliefs. So I understand why some businesses would want to deter the use of religious wear at work. According to the EEOC though, the law requires employers to “reasonably” accommodate an employee’s religious beliefs. Because of this law I believe it would be a more acceptable practice in the United States.
2. Select a category (age, race, religion, marital status, criminal/incarceration history, pregnancy, sex, sexual identity, education level, parenthood, national origin, dress, economic status, military status, and so forth). The most stereotypical choice would be military but for this example I want to focus on criminal/incarceration history.
3. In the United States, how are individuals in the category that you selected protected from discrimination in employment? Unfortunately there are no specific federal laws that prohibit employers from asking about an prospects criminal history, but it is a federal law to use criminal history to make employment decisions under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (U.S. EEOC, n.d.). I think however that if a person was convicted of a crime and served their time that it should not be discriminated against unless it is a crime such as pedophilia and they are applying to a place like child care or working in a school. Many careers deal in service attributes and I am pretty sure someone who attempted to murder someone with a poison might not be best suited for working in a kitchen. So in some aspects I am I guess discriminatory against those with a criminal history.
4. For the category you have selected, how are U.S. protections different from or similar to protections in another country (You choose the country to make the comparison). Much like the United States most of Europe does not have laws that prohibit criminal record-based employment discrimination (CBED). The protections are very similar in that only a limited amount of a person’s criminal record can be taken into account. Criminals in European countries do have to obtain or submit a criminal record certificate, but they do not have to provide a copy of their criminal record to the employer (Jacobs, Larrauri, 2015)
.
Reference
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). N.d. Laws Enforced by EEOC Retrieved from https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). N.d. Pre-Employment Inquiries a.
Module 1 Week 1 Discussion
Christopher Allen posted Feb 11, 2020 4:44 PM
1. How do you think the European case discussed in the video report would be decided in the United States? Why? In the United States there are many laws that help protect against discrimination. These laws cover the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex (U.S. EEOC, n.d). In the United States however, the wear of religious clothing in the workplace can be frowned upon depending on the career choice for safety reasons. Also visibly projecting a particular religion onto others could be a violation of others religious beliefs. So I understand why some businesses would want to deter the use of religious wear at work. According to the EEOC though, the law requires employers to “reasonably” accommodate an employee’s religious beliefs. Because of this law I believe it would be a more acceptable practice in the United States.
2. Select a category (age, race, religion, marital status, criminal/incarceration history, pregnancy, sex, sexual identity, education level, parenthood, national origin, dress, economic status, military status, and so forth). The most stereotypical choice would be military but for this example I want to focus on criminal/incarceration history.
3. In the United States, how are individuals in the category that you selected protected from discrimination in employment? Unfortunately there are no specific federal laws that prohibit employers from asking about an prospects criminal history, but it is a federal law to use criminal history to make employment decisions under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (U.S. EEOC, n.d.). I think however that if a person was convicted of a crime and served their time that it should not be discriminated against unless it is a crime such as pedophilia and they are applying to a place like child care or working in a school. Many careers deal in service attributes and I am pretty sure someone who attempted to murder someone with a poison might not be best suited for working in a kitchen. So in some aspects I am I guess discriminatory against those with a criminal history.
4. For the category you have selected, how are U.S. protections different from or similar to protections in another country (You choose the country to make the comparison). Much like the United States most of Europe does not have laws that prohibit criminal record-based employment discrimination (CBED). The protections are very similar in that only a limited amount of a person’s criminal record can be taken into account. Criminals in European countries do have to obtain or submit a criminal record certificate, but they do not have to provide a copy of their criminal record to the employer (Jacobs, Larrauri, 2015)
.
Reference
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). N.d. Laws Enforced by EEOC Retrieved from https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). N.d. Pre-Employment Inquiries a.
Parece que você já adicionou este slide ao painel
Você recortou seu primeiro slide!
Recortar slides é uma maneira fácil de colecionar slides importantes para acessar mais tarde. Agora, personalize o nome do seu painel de recortes.A família SlideShare acabou de crescer. Desfrute do acesso a milhões de ebooks, áudiolivros, revistas e muito mais a partir do Scribd.
Cancele a qualquer momento.Leitura ilimitada
Aprenda de forma mais rápida e inteligente com os maiores especialistas
Transferências ilimitadas
Faça transferências para ler em qualquer lugar e em movimento
Também terá acesso gratuito ao Scribd!
Acesso instantâneo a milhões de e-books, audiolivros, revistas, podcasts e muito mais.
Leia e ouça offline com qualquer dispositivo.
Acesso gratuito a serviços premium como Tuneln, Mubi e muito mais.
Atualizámos a nossa política de privacidade de modo a estarmos em conformidade com os regulamentos de privacidade em constante mutação a nível mundial e para lhe fornecer uma visão sobre as formas limitadas de utilização dos seus dados.
Pode ler os detalhes abaixo. Ao aceitar, está a concordar com a política de privacidade atualizada.
Obrigado!