I presented this deck for Paper: Map based interaction in Mobile Phones, published at India HCI and IDID 2010 conference. This research was done during my Master's of Interaction Design 2006-08 at IDC, IIT Boambay.
16. atishpatel06@gmail.com
problems ?
Text input
1. ~8000 station in IR, 3467 + for booking
2. ~76% of population semi-literate + Illiterate
3. People not mobile savvy, no SMS, no Contact Book
4. ‘BAN’ gives 36 station in filtered list
5. Station name more than 10 letters; ‘Vishakapatnam Junction’
6. ‘Anand Nagar - Gujarat’ … ‘Anand Vihar - West Bengal’
18. atishpatel06@gmail.com
problems ?
Text input
Audio input
1. 22 major languages, 1600 dialects
2. Great regional influence; ‘Mumbai - Bambai’ … ‘Vadodara - Baroda’
3. Pronunciation varies drastically from person to person
4. Audio based IVRS not liked; unavoidable options, mistakes
27. atishpatel06@gmail.com
working of map-based solution:
1. Normally 4 levels of zoom
2. Total stations that can be catered > 5000
3. If density of stations high, 5 zoom & if less, 3 zoom levels
29. atishpatel06@gmail.com
user study:
Found,
1. People travel yearly to their native places
2. Singles / Workers between home & work town
3. Few travel to new tourist or unknown places
30. atishpatel06@gmail.com
user study:
Found,
1. People travel yearly to their native places
2. Singles / Workers between home & work town
3. Few travel to new tourist or unknown places
Also, stated;
“We try to find or ask some information if we
have to go to a new place; like which state,
nearest junction station, stations to have
famous food, etc.”
“We have rough idea of the location of our
native place and if we are shown map, we will
be able to figure out where exactly it is.”
36. atishpatel06@gmail.com
user testing:
with paper map: 15 people
find native place, home, work town station
rarely or once visited station
never visited station, with some hints
37. atishpatel06@gmail.com
user testing:
with paper map: 15 people
find native place, home, work town station
rarely or once visited station
never visited station, with some hints
38. atishpatel06@gmail.com
user testing:
with Nokia 6300 prototype
Semi-literate people could not create or write
name of their home town stations in English or
native language; but, they could easily recognize
their already written station name.
Also, this map based navigation was little difficult
to understand at first go. But, when the users
reached 1st or 2nd zoom in level, then the
navigation model was completely clear to them
and they started using it confidently.
41. atishpatel06@gmail.com
user testing:
map-based vs textual method:
5 illiterates, 10 semi-literates, 5 literates
first attempt
42. atishpatel06@gmail.com
user testing:
map-based vs textual method:
5 illiterates, 10 semi-literates, 5 literates
first attempt
43. atishpatel06@gmail.com
user testing:
map-based vs textual method:
5 illiterates, 10 semi-literates, 5 literates
first attempt
second attempt
44. atishpatel06@gmail.com
user testing:
map-based vs textual method:
5 illiterates, 10 semi-literates, 5 literates
first attempt
second attempt
45. atishpatel06@gmail.com
user testing:
map-based vs textual method:
Non-mobile phone savvy & semi-literate people, very
strongly preferred map-based method over text
inputting.
This was because of ease in understanding map-based
inputting compared to three tap textual input model.
50. atishpatel06@gmail.com
refining design:
solve confusion, overload
Load Information on map step by step:
1st level - States demarcated , Capital cities and only Trunk routes
2nd level - Major stations and Other routes
3rd level - All stations with major stations bold
4th level - Stations present in grid in form of list
55. atishpatel06@gmail.com
thank you
Prof. Anirudha Joshi for guidance
Prof. Athavankar, Prof. Sreekumar, Prof. Ravi Poovaiah for inputs
Friends/Batch-mates of ACE and IDC
Users and Participants of User Studies
Images: www.flickr.com, www.google.com , www.wikipedia.com