Mais conteúdo relacionado

Similar a A simulated outbreak – Case Scenarios (20)

Mais de Abdullatif Al-Rashed(20)

A simulated outbreak – Case Scenarios

  1. A simulated outbreak – case Scenarios Abdullatif Sami Al Rashed Clinical Microbiology Resident King Fahd Hospital of The University
  2. Outlines • Introduction • Simulated outbreak cases • Steps of outbreak invesitgations.
  3. Introduction Investigations of acute infectious disease outbreaks are very common in hospital settings. The most important reason to investigate a recognized outbreak of disease is that exposure to the source of infection may be continuing; so by identifying and eliminating the source of infection, we can prevent additional cases. Other reasons for investigating outbreaks are the opportunity to 1) describe new diseases and learn more about known diseases; 2) evaluate existing prevention strategies, e.g., vaccines; 3) teach (and learn) epidemiology; and 4) address public concern about the outbreak. Association for Professionals in Infection Control (APIC) and Epidemiology, Inc. (2014). Chapter 12: Outbreak Investigations. In APIC Text of infection control and epidemiology (4th ed.).
  4. Definitions Association for Professionals in Infection Control (APIC) and Epidemiology, Inc. (2014). Chapter 12: Outbreak Investigations. In APIC Text of infection control and epidemiology (4th ed.). Term Definition An outbreak An increase in the incidence of a particular infection or colonization over the expected rate or when an unusual microbe or adverse event is recognized. Pseudo- outbreak Episode of increased disease incidence due to enhanced surveillance or other factor not related to the disease under study. (There is a rise in test results without actual clinical disease) Cluster An aggregation of cases in a given area over a particular period regardless of whether the number of cases is more than expected.
  5. Definitions Association for Professionals in Infection Control (APIC) and Epidemiology, Inc. (2014). Chapter 12: Outbreak Investigations. In APIC Text of infection control and epidemiology (4th ed.). Term Definition Epidemic curve is a graph in which the cases of a disease that occurred during an outbreak are plotted according to the time of onset of illness in each case. Case definition is a standard set of criteria for deciding whether an individual should be classified as having the health condition of interest. A case definition includes clinical criteria and, particularly in the setting of an outbreak investigation, restrictions by time, place, and person. Line-listing is a two-column list with variables in one column and the number and percentage of those who match that variable in the other column.
  6. What are the ways to recognize an outbreak? • Routine surveillance activities • Reports from clinicians and laboratories • Reports from affected individuals. Chapter 12: Outbreak Investigations. In APIC Text of infection control and epidemiology (4th ed.).
  7. Role of Microbiology lab In Outbreak Investigation The microbiology laboratory plays a crucial role in providing investigative support in an outbreak investigation and in the creation of routine surveillance information. The availability of culture reviews, which may result in the initiation of an outbreak investigation.
  8. Causes of Pseudo-outbreaks? 1- Laboratory factors ◆ Introduction of a new test which was previously unavailable locally. ◆ Introduction of a new laboratory test with poor specificity and/ or sensitivity. ◆ Improved laboratory techniques for identification. ◆ Contamination during processing in the laboratory of media or cross- contamination of the specimen during processing.
  9. Causes of pseudo-outbreaks? 2- Ward level ◆ Mis-labelling of specimens. Remember, if in doubt, ask for another specimen! ◆ Contamination during collection of specimens if the correct procedure is not followed or specimen sent in a non- sterile container. ◆ Incorrect diagnosis of clinical entity.
  10. Causes of pseudo-outbreaks? 3- Environmental factors ◆ Use of poor quality of water in the endoscopic washer disinfectors. • This can occur due to the presence of environmental mycobacteria (e.g. Mycobacterium chelonae) from the rinse water which subsequently contaminated bronchial washings sent for culture, leading to false positive results.
  11. Steps of an outbreak investigation 1.Verify the diagnosis. 2.Confirm the outbreak. 3.Define a case and conduct case finding. 4.Tabulate and orient data. 5.Take immediate control measures. 6. Formulate hypothesis. 7. Test your hypothesis. 8. Plan and execute additional studies. 9. Implement and evaluate control measures. 10. Communicate findings. These steps may occur simultaneously or be repeated as new information is received. Third (3rd) edition of GCC Infection Prevention & Control Manual.
  12. KFHU OUTBREAK CASES
  13. Case 1 • Known case of SCD admitted to 4C with Vaso- occlusive crisis, Date of Admission (DOA) 10/6/2019. • Shifted to MICU in 19/6/2019 duo to cardiac arrest , bed E137-A • Was having multiple bed sores, Folyes catheter and Jagular CV line and on mechanical ventilator Rectal Screening on 4/7/2019 grew:
  14. Case2 • Presented with Stroke. DOA 3/5/2019. • Admitted in MICU Multiple time last one in 17/6/2019, bed E-144 A • Was bed ridden and have stroke, dementia, on mechanical ventilation developed VAP Transtracheal Culture on 7/9/2019
  15. Case 3 • K/C Chrons disease admitted with acute flare attack with intestinal obstruction. DOA 22/6/2019 • Admitted in MICU in 1/7/2019, duo to ARDS and was intubated on mechanical ventilation bed E-143 A • Bed ridden and have stroke, dementia, on mechanical ventilation developed VAP Transtracheal Culture and sacral bed sore swab on 11/7/19
  16. Case 4 • DOA: 23/6/2019, • Medically free presented with pylonephritis, kidney stones, S/P stone removal. Developed sepsis and VAP after the operation. • intubated on mechanical ventilation shifted to SICU in 26/6/19 bed A-101 A Rectal screening on 4/7/2019
  17. Case 5 • K/C DM, HTN, CAD, HF, Post bariatric surgery. DOA: 3/6/2019. • Admitted to SICU multiple times duo to intra-abdominal collections last admission on 6/7/19 bed A-104 G • Intubated on mechanical ventilation. Throat swab on 7/7/2019
  18. Case 6 • DOA 4/7/2019, • Presented with decreased level of consciousness duo to subdural hematoma, admitted to SICU on 4/7/2019 bed A-104 C . • Intubated on mechanical ventilation. Throat swab on 7/7/2019
  19. Case 7 • DOA 23/6/2019, • Presented with polytrauma duo to RTA, was intubated in 23/6/2019 on mechanical ventilation in SICU bed A-104 F Transtracheal aspirate on 7/7/2019
  20. Summary of Cases In a one-week interval (4-11/7/2019) Nearly all of the cases are in near by beds 7 cases grew same strain of MDR Acinetobacter buamannii in surgical and medical ICUs 4 SICU 3 MICU
  21. Cont Microbiolgy oncall team suspected possible outbreak duo to recurrent isolation of same strain of A.bummanii Infection Control department has been notified to start an investigation of possible outbreak
  22. Before starting any investigation: • Get a commitment of support from the hospital staff and an approval from the administration and microbiology department. • Designate a leader for the investigation. • Advise microbiology to save specimens and isolates for antimicrobial susceptibility testing , molecular and non-molecular typing . • Alert laboratory to keep any subsequent isolates that may be part of the outbreak.
  23. 1- Verify diagnosis of the reported cases; identify agent if possible 1. Rule out pseudo-outbreak 2. Characterize the nature of disease and signs and symptoms by reviewing patient charts. 3. Obtain appropriate laboratory specimens to identify specific agent responsible. In Our Cases?
  24. 2- Confirm the existence of an outbreak • Compare the current incidence with the usual or baseline incidence: • Make initial judgment using numerator data. • Do this comparing the outbreak period rate with the background rate of the same disease. • If no local data is available use outbreak rates from the literature.
  25. 5 Comments and Recommendations: Graph Represents the 1st and 2nd quarter of 2019 monthly data over time for “Hospital acquired MRAB rate”. The P values are less than (0.05), therefore the process was unstable. and was present of special cause Version. Graph Represents the comparison of the actual performance of Hospital acquired MRAB rate of 2014 to the 2nd quarter of 2019 by quarters with the Benchmark. There is an increase in the rate during the 2nd quarter 2019 (MRAB outbreak in MICU during the month of April and MRAB outbreak in CCU during the month of May-June)both outbreak were investigated and corrected by infection control team ),main reasons for the outbreak are 1- the non availability of recommended supply for cleaning and disinfection of medical equipment 2- staff are not fully compliant with cleaning and disinfection of medical equipment Letters was made with recommendations to concerned department and administration Hospital Acquired MRAB rate per 1000 patients days Infection ControlResponsibility ProcessType High risk, Problem prone.Criteria for selection number of new cases of hospital acquired MRABNumerator number of patients daysDenominator N/D * 1000Equation ≤1.2%Threshold Patient chart/records, Quadra med CPR System, Lab resultData source SafetyDimension of Performance: MonthlyFrequency of measurement 1 2 2 1 KFHU Data
  26. 3-Define a case definition and conduct case finding • Develop a specific case definition using: Symptoms or laboratory results (Person) Time period (Time) Location (Place) • Conduct surveillance using case definition Existing surveillance Active surveillance (e.g. review medical records) • Interview case-patients Must be applied consistently and without bias to all persons under investigation The case definition maybe changed as new information is gathered.
  27. Characterize cases of diseases by person, place and time • Time: used to create an epidemic curve. • Epidemic curve - Illustrates time course of the outbreak by drawing a histogram of number of cases by their date of onset. • Place: • by service, ward, operating room. May use tables. • Person: • Characteristics of the case patients help in defining the most likely risk factors for infection. Factors to assess include : • Patient characteristics (i.e., age, sex, underlying disease) • Possible exposures (i.e., surgery, nursing and medical staff, infected patients) • Therapeutic modalities (i.e., invasive procedures, medications, antibiotics) • Use all of the above to develop an accurate description of the population at risk
  28. Reference: CBAHI outbreak management manual
  29. 3- Define a case and conduct case finding • Classification: • Definite (confirmed) • Laboratory confirmed • Probable • Typical clinical features without lab confirmation • Possible (suspected) • Fewer of the typical clinical features
  30. In our Cases? • Person? • Patients with multiple comorbidities have MDR Acinetobacter baumannii • Place? • MICU & SICU (specify the beds?) • Time? • July 2019
  31. Search for additional cases: • Encourage immediate reporting of new cases by laboratory, physicians, nursing staff and others as appropriate (e.g. radiology in new cases of pneumonia). • Search for other cases that may have occurred retrospectively or concurrently through laboratory reports, medical records, patient charts, physicians and nursing staff and public health data.
  32. 4-Tabulate and orient data • Create line listing with benchmar k 5 Comments and Recommendations: Graph Represents the 1st and 2nd quarter of 2019 monthly data over time for “Hospital acquired MRAB rate”. The P values are less than (0.05), therefore the process was unstable. and was present of special cause Version. Graph Represents the comparison of the actual performance of Hospital acquired MRAB rate of 2014 to the 2nd quarter of 2019 by quarters with the Benchmark. There is an increase in the rate during the 2nd quarter 2019 (MRAB outbreak in MICU during the month of April and MRAB outbreak in CCU during the month of May-June)both outbreak were investigated and corrected by infection control team ),main reasons for the outbreak are 1- the non availability of recommended supply for cleaning and disinfection of medical equipment 2- staff are not fully compliant with cleaning and disinfection of medical equipment Letters was made with recommendations to concerned department and administration Hospital Acquired MRAB rate per 1000 patients days Infection ControlResponsibility ProcessType High risk, Problem prone.Criteria for selection number of new cases of hospital acquired MRABNumerator number of patients daysDenominator N/D * 1000Equation ≤1.2%Threshold Patient chart/records, Quadra med CPR System, Lab resultData source SafetyDimension of Performance: MonthlyFrequency of measurement 1 2 2 1
  33. 5-Take immediate control measures • If an obvious source of the contamination is identified…institute control measures immediately! • e.g.: Hand hygiene • Additional use of barriers (e.g., gloves and gown),or specified suspected product (e.g., patient care item)
  34. In our cases • Infection control department encourge for strict compliance to hand hyagine, PPE use and isolation precautions. What are the infection control precaution of A.baumannii ?
  35. 6-Formulate hypothesis • Record, tabulate and review data collected from above activities to summarize common host factors and exposures. • Also Literature reviews of previous outbreaks. • Develop a hypothesis (best guess) on the likely reservoir source, and mode of transmission of the disease. • Hypothesis should explain the majority of cases
  36. Hypotheses should address • Reservoir • Source of the agent • Mode of transmission (Vector or vehicle ) • Exposure that caused disease Review data to determine common host factors and exposures.
  37. 7- Test hypothesis • Analyze data derived from case investigation and determine sources of transmission and risk factors associated with disease.
  38. TEST HYPOTHESIS ELGUJJA
  39. What is your hypothesis in our cases?
  40. 8-Plan and execute additional studies • Environmental sampling or personnel based oCollect appropriate samples oAllow epidemiological data to guide testing oIf analytic study results are conclusive, don’t wait for positive samples before implementing prevention.
  41. In our cases Investigation was done by the IC team to determine the source of this recurrent outbreak through direct observation and environmental cultres. Including ECG Machines, Nurse stations tables, Portable CXR, Stethscopes, portable computers, Infusion pumps, bedside files table, PPE tables, E.g.
  42. IC • Envornmental cultures showed growth of Acintobacter baumannii MDR (same strain isolated from the patients) in SICU ECG machine. • Which after investigations showed that is the shared by SICU, MICU, 1D, burn unit and other units. • The source of this oubreak has been identified. • Furthermore, Pseudomonas aerigonosa, Pantoea spp, and E.coli have beem identified from other medical equepiments.
  43. 9-Implement and evaluate control measures 1. Prevent further exposure and future outbreaks by eliminating or treating the source 2. Work with regulators, industry, and health educators to institute measures 3. Create mechanism to evaluate both short-and long-term success.
  44. In our Cases • In order to prevent recurrent outbreaks, these actions have been applied: Guiding all units about proper cleaning & disinfiction of medical equipment after each use by the concerned staff (user). Strict compliance to hand hyagine, PPE use and isolation precautions. KFHU MRAB IPP
  45. 10-Communicate findings Oral briefing. Written report. Summarize investigation, make recommendations, and disseminate report to all participants.
  46. References • Third (3rd) edition of GCC Infection Prevention & Control Manual. • Association for Professionals in Infection Control (APIC) and Epidemiology, Inc. (2014). • Chapter 12: Outbreak Investigations. In APIC Text of infection control and epidemiology (4th ed.). • KFHU outbreak management IPP • CBAHI Outbreak Management Manual
  47. Thank you

Notas do Editor

  1. There are many definitions of outbreak but this is from APIC book Causes of pseudo-outbreak will be discussed in the following slides
  2. Epidemic curve is used in outbreak investigation
  3. We will start with this qs
  4. It is better to devide the causes according to
  5. We will go through these steps while discussing the cases
  6. The story started with this case They repeated screening multiple times
  7. What do you notice regarding the strain
  8. This is the importance of micro lab in outbreak investigation. Suspect possible outbreak if you notice recurrent isolation of same strain of any micro-organisms
  9. Now we will go through the steps in theory and apply it in our cases. In our cases as we said, acintobacter baumannii was identify it in patients having multiple co-morbidites, bed ridden and on devices. Pseudo-outbreak has been roled out
  10. This is the KFHU data of hospital acquired MRAB The thershold or benchmark is 1.2% (rate/1000 patients)
  11. This is in details the case definition
  12. They thought that devices are the main source of infection in our cases so
  13. How we implement and evaluate control measures? by
  14. I couldn’t get the written report from the IC