Bishop germany 2015_slidesh_part b
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
2 likes•399 views
Part B of Dr Pam Bishop of NIMBioS presentation about their evaluation procedures and results.
Recommended
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (20)
Similar to Bishop germany 2015_slidesh_part b
Similar to Bishop germany 2015_slidesh_part b (20)
More from Alison Specht
More from Alison Specht (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Bishop germany 2015_slidesh_part b
- 1. Number of Publications 15 50 58 96 113 88 6 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Annual Cumulative 4 420
- 2. Top publications by 5-year impact factor Nature 38.16 Cell 34.37 Science 33.59 Moecular Ecology 6.79 pnas 10.58PLoS Biology 13.45 Systematic Biology 13.32 Ecology Letters 18.50 Tree 17.11 3 1 5 8 5 2 5 13 7 PLoS Computational Biology 5.94 Ecology 6.37 6 8 Evolution 5.40 Proc of royal Soc B 5.83 9 12
- 3. Product Source Ed./Out 10% Investigative Workshop 14%NIMBioS Postdoctoral Fellows 23% Sabbatical 5% Short-term Visitor 10% Tutorial 4% Working Group 34%
- 4. Articles in Web of Science Total Citations average citations per article H-index BIBLIOMETRICS 374 3552 9.52 27 CITATION DATA Currently have 8 Web of Science “highly cited” papers—top1% for subject field and publication year
- 7. Comparison? 15 67 122 211 290 4 15 43 70 98 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 #Publications Publication Year NIMBioS Annual MBI Annual NIMBioS Cumulative MBI Cumulative # Publications
- 9. UNIQUENESS OF NIMBIOS Ways in which Working Group research collaborations differed from participants’ other research collaborations 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Journals targeted for publication Competetive grants applied for Academic conferences at which research is presented Research methods used Disciplinary topics involved Scientific questions addressed Much different Slightly different Not different YEAR 6 DATA N = 45
- 10. Multiscale Modeling of the Life Cycle of Toxoplasma gondii WG 2014 Ocean Viral Dynamics WG 2014 testimonials Participant experiences New Approaches The multiscale approach was specifically original, also with the possibility to interact in small groups (contrarily to conferences) Unique experience of nimbios The new and highly interesting for me was the interdisciplinarity of the collaboration, which would not have happened otherwise
- 11. 21% 40% 45% International co-authorship # co-authors Cross-institutional co-authorship Behavior change case study Affiliation with a NIMBioS Working Group Research Evaluation 2014 N = 46 (161) w a g
- 13. How do we detect/measure: policy impacts? scientific impacts (“shifting the paradigm”)? ROI? long-term value added to human capital (scientific and technical capital)? societal outcomes (serving your nation’s needs and long-term interests)? Are there data that can be shared across centers? How? Moving forward
- 14. FACEBOOK facebook.com/NIMBioS TWITTER twitter.com/NIMBioS web site nimbios.org Live stream nimbios.org/videos/livestream BIMONTHLY NEWSLETTER nimbios.org/press/newsletter nimbios blog nimbios.org/wordpress YOUTUBE youtube.com/user/NIMBioS LINKEDIN linkedin.com/company/national-institute-for- mathematical-and-biological-synthesis-nimbios- FOLLOW US Social + Info links t v
Editor's Notes
- So, as opposed to the number of SCs, no we are looking qualitatively at which categories in which participants are publishing pre to post. The gray background intersections are the 224 WOS Subject Categories from the science citation index I and the social science citation index, located based on cross-citation relationships among all WOS journals in 2007 . The 19 labeled “macro-disciplines” are based on factor analysis of that cross-citation matrix also. The gray lines linking the SCs are based on these overall WOS patterns, not the publications currently under study. Nearness on the map indicates a closer relationship among disciplines. Circular node sizes reflect the relative number of publications in the current study. SCs in which publications were more focused before, or in which there was no change in numbers of publications are lighter grey. SCs in which publications are more focused after affiliation appear as black nodes. SCs in which researchers published only after affiliation with the center are represented with white nodes. Map provides a visual perspective of a shift in publication SCs toward mathematical fields, with more gray nodes in the Ecological, Biomedical, and Agricultural Science discipline areas, and more black and white nodes in the Mathematical Methods, Materials Science, Computer Science, and Economics, Politics & Geography discipline areas.
- So, as opposed to the number of SCs, no we are looking qualitatively at which categories in which participants are publishing pre to post. The gray background intersections are the 224 WOS Subject Categories from the science citation index I and the social science citation index, located based on cross-citation relationships among all WOS journals in 2007 . The 19 labeled “macro-disciplines” are based on factor analysis of that cross-citation matrix also. The gray lines linking the SCs are based on these overall WOS patterns, not the publications currently under study. Nearness on the map indicates a closer relationship among disciplines. Circular node sizes reflect the relative number of publications in the current study. SCs in which publications were more focused before, or in which there was no change in numbers of publications are lighter grey. SCs in which publications are more focused after affiliation appear as black nodes. SCs in which researchers published only after affiliation with the center are represented with white nodes. Map provides a visual perspective of a shift in publication SCs toward mathematical fields, with more gray nodes in the Ecological, Biomedical, and Agricultural Science discipline areas, and more black and white nodes in the Mathematical Methods, Materials Science, Computer Science, and Economics, Politics & Geography discipline areas.