O slideshow foi denunciado.
Utilizamos seu perfil e dados de atividades no LinkedIn para personalizar e exibir anúncios mais relevantes. Altere suas preferências de anúncios quando desejar.

Narrative driven game design

2.623 visualizações

Publicada em

We think in stories. Narratives are tools we use to make sense of the world, both in life and in games. Seeing how all stories work in a similiar way, and how all gameplay loops share their structure with stories, we will explore the similarities and look for tools that will help us design better games. This talk, inspired by John Yorke's book "Into the Woods. How stories work and why we tell them", and based on over ten years of experience in the industry, aims to present a consistent narrative-driven approach to game design.

A talk from Games Industry Conference 2017

Publicada em: Design
  • Login to see the comments

Narrative driven game design

  1. 1. The road ahead 1. Introductions 2. How stories work? 3. Stories vs gameplay loops 4. Storyteller’s take on games 5. Narrative-driven game design
  2. 2. My experience Story and Game Designer (background in data analysis) ● 11 bit studios ● ATGames ● CD Projekt RED ● Lodz University of Technology
  3. 3. Special Thanks John Yorke Into the Woods How stories work and why we tell them
  4. 4. Story Designer’s Dilemmas 1. How to tell stories in games? 2. How good are games for telling stories? 3. How can I use gameplay to tell stories? 4. How to design stories in games to make the best of the medium?
  5. 5. How to use our knowledge of stories to make better games?
  6. 6. Once upon a time... there was someone living a normal live... until something happened and our hero had to leave the safe home … in a search for something that was important and was lacking … only to learn that to find it, the hero must face a grave and deadly danger … the odds seemed impossible, but our hero overcame all opposition… and returned home with a prize that brought peace and happiness to all.
  7. 7. Every story has the same shape Nothing interesting happens Beginning Something unexpected happens Middle Something unexpected happens End Nothing interesting happens
  8. 8. Three Act Structure 1. ACT ONE: Set-up a. character with a flaw/need b. inciting incident c. turning point 2. ACT TWO: Confrontation a. desire vs forces of antagonism b. learning about a new world c. crisis: confrontation or escape 3. ACT THREE: Resolution a. climax, final battle b. using learned skills c. reward
  9. 9. Dramatic Arc
  10. 10. Five Act Structure 1. exposition - dramatis personae, seed of conflict 2. complications - intrigues, clash of interests 3. climax - hero at the crossroads 4. falling action - consequences, false hopes/fears 5. resolution - catastrophe and downfall / victory and transfiguration
  11. 11. There And Back Again total mastery re-acceptance reawakening Act 1 no knowledge growing knowledge awakening Act 3 experimenting with knowledge Act 2 doubt overcoming reluctance acceptance Midpoint (breakthrough) key knowledge Act 4 experimenting post-knowledge Act 5 regression growing reluctance doubt
  12. 12. Learning process 1. Thesis 2. Antithesis 3. Synthesis (a.k.a) problem → reaction → solution
  13. 13. Stories are our brain’s attempt to make sense of a chaotic universe
  14. 14. Gameplay loop 1. Objective 2. Challenge 3. Reward (a.k.a) problem → reaction → solution
  15. 15. Stories are our brain’s attempt to make sense of a chaotic universe
  16. 16. To master a game our brain has to make sense of a new, unknown world
  17. 17. The Fractal Nature of Stories and Games ● Story (complete change) ○ exposition / complications ○ midpoint (crisis) ○ consequences / resolution ● Act (major change) ○ set-up ○ journey ○ climax / resolution ● Scene (minor change) ○ conflict ○ turning point / cliffhanger ● Beat (exchange) ○ action ○ reaction ● Game ○ exposition / tutorial / complications ○ growing difficulty / stakes ○ growth / total mastery / endgame ● Level/Act ○ objective ○ exploration / struggle ○ final challenge / resolution ● Encounter ○ challenge ○ win / fail state ● Second-to-second gameplay ○ action ○ reaction
  18. 18. How to put stories into gameplay?
  19. 19. We think in stories When we play, our brain creates narratives, looks for motivations, attributes emotions, etc. Can we prevent it? Kuleshov Effect says: not really
  20. 20. ● character development ● audience engagement ● audience satisfaction and subverting expectations ● motivations and empathy ● dialogues and exposition ● emergent narratives Storyteller’s take on games
  21. 21. What makes a hero? Consider these situations: ● In a bar, a woman walks up to a man who is drinking alone, and says… ● A boy who is bullied at school finds a magic lamp, and asks the djinn for... ● A man loses his family in an accident; one day he wakes up and decides… ● A huntress stands at an entrance to a cave, she sniffs the air and… What makes a hero unique, is the the decision made in the moment of crisis. In a game that decision is usually made by the player.
  22. 22. Two types of a hero Three dimensional hero ● has a true self hidden behind a mask ● desires one thing / needs the opposite ● has a flaw that can be fatal ● must confront own flaws ● discovers true self ● changes ● lasts for just one story ● deeply satisfying (when done right) Two dimensional hero ● is transparent, needs no mask ● desire = need ● has a deficiency of knowledge ● must confront external opposition ● re-asserts true self ● stays the same ● perfect for series/sequels ● highly addictive (when done right)
  23. 23. Character development Two dimensional approach: ● gain EXP, learn new skills ● character development = increasing knowledge ● character development ≠ true change ● power creep vs jumping the shark ● requires occasional amnesia Let’s consider: why was power scaling in Oblivion such a bad idea?
  24. 24. Character development Three dimensional approach: ● make decisions, observe consequences ● character development = progress in the story ● character development ≠ increasing mastery ● player’s desire vs characters need ● may rely on a player’s decision Let’s consider: ○ the character arc vs the player arc in Life is Strange ○ why was the prequel to Life is Strange met with mixed expectations?
  25. 25. Dramatic changes Facade vs Flaw Desire vs Need Opposition vs Hero Hero vs Opposition (tragedies) Difficulty vs Skill Ignorance vs Knowledge
  26. 26. Random thoughts on the topic Q: Is it possible to make a long-lasting series with satisfying character arcs? A: Yes, when it is hardwired into the setting. Consider Doctor Who and Zelda. Q: Is it possible to make a gamey-game with a three-dimensional character? A: I am not sure. Need for mastery drives learning, but not change.
  27. 27. Audience engagement Audience like to earn their entertainment. ● The “2+2=?” rule. ● Gameplay (high engagement) as storytelling tool; system rhetorics. ● Effort put into learning the game increases player’s involvement. ● When curiosity is your friend, fear is your enemy.
  28. 28. Subverting expectations ● Dark inversions ○ hero’s “flaw” is his virtue ○ hero’s true self is evil ○ story ends in a catastrophe ○ let’s consider “Breaking Bad” and “God of War” ● Disturbed structure ○ parts of the character arc are missing or misplaced ○ surprise and dissonance creates strong emotional response ○ difficulty curve and fail/reload system as the character arc ○ overused or mishandled causes frustration ○ let’s consider “No Country for Old Men”, “Dark Souls” and “Mass Effect 3”
  29. 29. Drama is based on credible vibrant breathing living empathetic characters. ● Questions: ○ do you believe in your character’s motivation? ○ do you really understand what the antagonist wants and why? ○ how often can you tell how your opponents feel, what they emotions are? ● Red flags: ○ someone’s abilities in a cutscene are radically different from abilities in gameplay ○ important decisions are made for the player, not by the player ○ the only motivation in a scene stems from gameplay Motivations and empathy
  30. 30. Dialogues Common problems with in-game dialogues: ● over exposure and info dump ● boring A-B structure ● no tension ● TL;DR ● unclear choices
  31. 31. Dialogues Common answers to the problems with in-game dialogues: ● over exposure and info dump - add a character that needs to know ● boring A-B structure - add conflict to the scene, A-B structure needs beat ● no tension - do all character have a need to be there? ● TL;DR - write less, hire an editor ● unclear choices - first a motivation then a choice, not the other way round
  32. 32. Mindframe for dialogues Every dialogue is an action scene ● use opposition to present a dilemma ● use the dilemma to characterize the characters ● words show the facade, choices reveal the flaw ● prepare scene for the change or revelation
  33. 33. Mindframe for dialogues Make players work for their entertainment ● instead of writing “4” write “2+2=?” ● use Kuleshov Effect to make players create their own sense (let’s consider the father-son scene in Heavy Rain) ● consider skipping dialogue, use system rhetorics instead (merchant talk in Witcher 3 vs trader interface in This War of Mine) ● surprises, unexpected emotions, new knowledge are perceived as a reward and a motivator
  34. 34. Emergent narratives Players create their own stories and we can do nothing to change that ● obligatory anecdote about user-perceived stories in games ● chain of cause and effect - event sequences are interpreted as stories ● Kuleshov effect - juxtaposed events color perceived emotions and motivations ● emergent narratives are almost impossible to track ● … but may be enhanced by a feedback loop to player’s choices and states When people talk about games they play, they talk in their personal emergent narratives. Hypothesis: the better the narratives, the better the word-of-mouth.
  35. 35. Is your game a good story?
  36. 36. Every story is about something Theme is the underlying question asked by the story. You need one. 1. question - assumption (thesis) 2. exploration - challenging assumption (antithesis) 3. answer - conclusion (synthesis) The answer is not universal, it always has an author: ● designer’s answer ● player’s choice from presented designer’s answers ● player’s answer, emergent and internal
  37. 37. How does this particular gameplay mechanism make a good story?
  38. 38. The basic story/gameplay building block 1. discovery - the hero notices/learns something and decides to act 2. truth! - true nature of the opposition/ hero’s flaw reveals itself 3. assimilation - the hero act on that new knowledge and succeeds/fails
  39. 39. Game-as-a-good-story checklist ● what the hero wants, what the opposition wants, is there a conflict? ● does the player want the same thing that the hero wants? ● where is the moment of choice, what is at stake? ● what does the hero learn, what does the player learn? ● do all actors have a reason to be in this situation, what do they want to gain? ● does the hero change or reveal some inner truth, in what way? ● does this situation end in a setup for a new scene (a cliffhanger)?
  40. 40. Game-as-a-good-scene checklist ● what does the player expect entering the scene? ● what does the player learn from interacting with the scene? ● how can the player use the new knowledge to win the scene?
  41. 41. The Universal Quest Every story is about a journey, finding of the missing part, its retrieval and making of something whole.
  42. 42. The Universal Gameplay Every game is a conflict, two opposites clash opposites are assimilated and the conflict is stilled.
  43. 43. Learning Process Every story and every game is about making sense of the universe, 1. we ask a question 2. test it against the world 3. and assimilate what we’ve learned.
  44. 44. Narrative-driven game design We can use the universal story structure to create meaningful and exciting games. 1. question - theme, motivation, why the question was asked? 2. learning - testing, development, understanding, decisions, crucial knowledge 3. assimilation - consequences, feedback to decisions, internal stories, change By hijacking our brain’s learning mechanisms we can create a new game-specific language to tell engaging and emotional stories.
  45. 45. Looking for a meaning Every story has an author. ● system rhetorics = authorial voice ● decisions = asserting identity ● cause and effect chain = internal narratives ● fractal structure = consistency of theme and mood ● structure ≠ meaning In the end we must have something interesting to say.