Enviar pesquisa
Carregar
Optimization based Chassis Design
•
3 gostaram
•
2,635 visualizações
Altair
Seguir
Denunciar
Compartilhar
Denunciar
Compartilhar
1 de 25
Baixar agora
Baixar para ler offline
Recomendados
Baja sae india suspension design
Baja sae india suspension design
Upender Rawat
A study on DOE of tubular rear axle twist beam using HyperStudy
A study on DOE of tubular rear axle twist beam using HyperStudy
Altair
VDHS-11-Suspension Design.docx
VDHS-11-Suspension Design.docx
Anthony678637
Vehicle dynamics ppt shiva
Vehicle dynamics ppt shiva
Shiva Nand
Design,analysis and optimization of disc brake
Design,analysis and optimization of disc brake
VenugopalraoSuravara
Traction control systems
Traction control systems
Vijay Shivakumar
Vehicle Body Engineering Body & Safety Considerations
Vehicle Body Engineering Body & Safety Considerations
Rajat Seth
“CONCEPT VALIDATION AND DESIGN SYNTHESIS OF CAR DASHBOARD AS PER PLASTIC TRIM...
“CONCEPT VALIDATION AND DESIGN SYNTHESIS OF CAR DASHBOARD AS PER PLASTIC TRIM...
Jayesh Sarode
Recomendados
Baja sae india suspension design
Baja sae india suspension design
Upender Rawat
A study on DOE of tubular rear axle twist beam using HyperStudy
A study on DOE of tubular rear axle twist beam using HyperStudy
Altair
VDHS-11-Suspension Design.docx
VDHS-11-Suspension Design.docx
Anthony678637
Vehicle dynamics ppt shiva
Vehicle dynamics ppt shiva
Shiva Nand
Design,analysis and optimization of disc brake
Design,analysis and optimization of disc brake
VenugopalraoSuravara
Traction control systems
Traction control systems
Vijay Shivakumar
Vehicle Body Engineering Body & Safety Considerations
Vehicle Body Engineering Body & Safety Considerations
Rajat Seth
“CONCEPT VALIDATION AND DESIGN SYNTHESIS OF CAR DASHBOARD AS PER PLASTIC TRIM...
“CONCEPT VALIDATION AND DESIGN SYNTHESIS OF CAR DASHBOARD AS PER PLASTIC TRIM...
Jayesh Sarode
Vehicle Design construction
Vehicle Design construction
Rajat Seth
Vehicle Body Engineering - Introduction
Vehicle Body Engineering - Introduction
Rajat Seth
Basic car terminologies
Basic car terminologies
HEMANTRAUT
Dual clutch Transmission
Dual clutch Transmission
Bisal Karmakar
Electronic Control Unit(ECU)
Electronic Control Unit(ECU)
Ankul Gupta
Virtual baja 2016 17355 alpha college of engg. and tech._presentation.ppt
Virtual baja 2016 17355 alpha college of engg. and tech._presentation.ppt
Ishan Mehta
Car crash testing
Car crash testing
Kumar Manikantan T
BAJA 2014 presentation
BAJA 2014 presentation
Siddhesh Ozarkar
Propeller shaft & universal joint
Propeller shaft & universal joint
deep388
Design, Analysis and fabrication of ATV (All Terrain Vehicle) for the event B...
Design, Analysis and fabrication of ATV (All Terrain Vehicle) for the event B...
vinay kumar
Hybrid Electric Vehicle
Hybrid Electric Vehicle
Er Aishwary Singh Baghel
UK ATC 2015: Optimised Rear Twist Beam Design
UK ATC 2015: Optimised Rear Twist Beam Design
Altair
Virtual BAJA 2015_16116_Team A.T.O.M_PRESENTATION
Virtual BAJA 2015_16116_Team A.T.O.M_PRESENTATION
sunil14294
2.frame
2.frame
shaikusmanshag
Active suspension system
Active suspension system
Axay Patel
Biw with definitions
Biw with definitions
Kalapu Ajay kumar
Study of principles of steering
Study of principles of steering
sardar vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology
Automobile Chassis
Automobile Chassis
PEC University Chandigarh
Bus Crash Analysis
Bus Crash Analysis
tsmanjurao
Chassis
Chassis
Peeyush Chauhan
Optimization of chassis ansys
Optimization of chassis ansys
CADmantra Technologies
Simulation and Virtual Product Development of Advanced Automotive Batteries
Simulation and Virtual Product Development of Advanced Automotive Batteries
Sandeep Sovani, Ph.D.
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Mais procurados
Vehicle Design construction
Vehicle Design construction
Rajat Seth
Vehicle Body Engineering - Introduction
Vehicle Body Engineering - Introduction
Rajat Seth
Basic car terminologies
Basic car terminologies
HEMANTRAUT
Dual clutch Transmission
Dual clutch Transmission
Bisal Karmakar
Electronic Control Unit(ECU)
Electronic Control Unit(ECU)
Ankul Gupta
Virtual baja 2016 17355 alpha college of engg. and tech._presentation.ppt
Virtual baja 2016 17355 alpha college of engg. and tech._presentation.ppt
Ishan Mehta
Car crash testing
Car crash testing
Kumar Manikantan T
BAJA 2014 presentation
BAJA 2014 presentation
Siddhesh Ozarkar
Propeller shaft & universal joint
Propeller shaft & universal joint
deep388
Design, Analysis and fabrication of ATV (All Terrain Vehicle) for the event B...
Design, Analysis and fabrication of ATV (All Terrain Vehicle) for the event B...
vinay kumar
Hybrid Electric Vehicle
Hybrid Electric Vehicle
Er Aishwary Singh Baghel
UK ATC 2015: Optimised Rear Twist Beam Design
UK ATC 2015: Optimised Rear Twist Beam Design
Altair
Virtual BAJA 2015_16116_Team A.T.O.M_PRESENTATION
Virtual BAJA 2015_16116_Team A.T.O.M_PRESENTATION
sunil14294
2.frame
2.frame
shaikusmanshag
Active suspension system
Active suspension system
Axay Patel
Biw with definitions
Biw with definitions
Kalapu Ajay kumar
Study of principles of steering
Study of principles of steering
sardar vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology
Automobile Chassis
Automobile Chassis
PEC University Chandigarh
Bus Crash Analysis
Bus Crash Analysis
tsmanjurao
Chassis
Chassis
Peeyush Chauhan
Mais procurados
(20)
Vehicle Design construction
Vehicle Design construction
Vehicle Body Engineering - Introduction
Vehicle Body Engineering - Introduction
Basic car terminologies
Basic car terminologies
Dual clutch Transmission
Dual clutch Transmission
Electronic Control Unit(ECU)
Electronic Control Unit(ECU)
Virtual baja 2016 17355 alpha college of engg. and tech._presentation.ppt
Virtual baja 2016 17355 alpha college of engg. and tech._presentation.ppt
Car crash testing
Car crash testing
BAJA 2014 presentation
BAJA 2014 presentation
Propeller shaft & universal joint
Propeller shaft & universal joint
Design, Analysis and fabrication of ATV (All Terrain Vehicle) for the event B...
Design, Analysis and fabrication of ATV (All Terrain Vehicle) for the event B...
Hybrid Electric Vehicle
Hybrid Electric Vehicle
UK ATC 2015: Optimised Rear Twist Beam Design
UK ATC 2015: Optimised Rear Twist Beam Design
Virtual BAJA 2015_16116_Team A.T.O.M_PRESENTATION
Virtual BAJA 2015_16116_Team A.T.O.M_PRESENTATION
2.frame
2.frame
Active suspension system
Active suspension system
Biw with definitions
Biw with definitions
Study of principles of steering
Study of principles of steering
Automobile Chassis
Automobile Chassis
Bus Crash Analysis
Bus Crash Analysis
Chassis
Chassis
Destaque
Optimization of chassis ansys
Optimization of chassis ansys
CADmantra Technologies
Simulation and Virtual Product Development of Advanced Automotive Batteries
Simulation and Virtual Product Development of Advanced Automotive Batteries
Sandeep Sovani, Ph.D.
Chassis Selection Guide
Chassis Selection Guide
envisionjeremys
Analysis of chassis
Analysis of chassis
CADmantra Technologies
Stress Analysis of a heavy duty vehicle chassis by using FEA
Stress Analysis of a heavy duty vehicle chassis by using FEA
Digitech Rathod
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF HEAVY VEHICLE CHASSIS USING HONEY COMB STRUCTURE
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF HEAVY VEHICLE CHASSIS USING HONEY COMB STRUCTURE
Ijripublishers Ijri
Automobile chassis and automobile body
Automobile chassis and automobile body
rudrik joshi
Rpt bahasa malaysia 3 v2 (1)
Rpt bahasa malaysia 3 v2 (1)
Rusniza Binti Sidik Ros
Automobile chassis frame
Automobile chassis frame
jjHF47
AUTOMONBILE CHASSIS & BODY ENGINEERING
AUTOMONBILE CHASSIS & BODY ENGINEERING
Devendra Hembade
Stress analysis of chassis ppt
Stress analysis of chassis ppt
Ameya Nijasure
Slideshare ppt
Slideshare ppt
Mandy Suzanne
Destaque
(12)
Optimization of chassis ansys
Optimization of chassis ansys
Simulation and Virtual Product Development of Advanced Automotive Batteries
Simulation and Virtual Product Development of Advanced Automotive Batteries
Chassis Selection Guide
Chassis Selection Guide
Analysis of chassis
Analysis of chassis
Stress Analysis of a heavy duty vehicle chassis by using FEA
Stress Analysis of a heavy duty vehicle chassis by using FEA
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF HEAVY VEHICLE CHASSIS USING HONEY COMB STRUCTURE
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF HEAVY VEHICLE CHASSIS USING HONEY COMB STRUCTURE
Automobile chassis and automobile body
Automobile chassis and automobile body
Rpt bahasa malaysia 3 v2 (1)
Rpt bahasa malaysia 3 v2 (1)
Automobile chassis frame
Automobile chassis frame
AUTOMONBILE CHASSIS & BODY ENGINEERING
AUTOMONBILE CHASSIS & BODY ENGINEERING
Stress analysis of chassis ppt
Stress analysis of chassis ppt
Slideshare ppt
Slideshare ppt
Semelhante a Optimization based Chassis Design
Portfolio
Portfolio
Kedarsr
Enterprise
Enterprise
Rajesh Kumar
Minor Project PPT
Minor Project PPT
MOHAMMAD NADEEM KHAN
IRJET- Design Optimization of a Formula Student Suspension
IRJET- Design Optimization of a Formula Student Suspension
IRJET Journal
A Method for Finding Document Containning Reactionary Viewpoints
A Method for Finding Document Containning Reactionary Viewpoints
IRJET Journal
IRJET- Thermal Behavior of Disc Brake Rotor using Finite Element Analysis
IRJET- Thermal Behavior of Disc Brake Rotor using Finite Element Analysis
IRJET Journal
R Programming: Transform/Reshape Data In R
R Programming: Transform/Reshape Data In R
Rsquared Academy
A way to reduce mass of gearbox housing
A way to reduce mass of gearbox housing
Altair
Design and Optimization of Steering System
Design and Optimization of Steering System
IRJET Journal
Automotive Noise and Vibration Congress 2016
Automotive Noise and Vibration Congress 2016
ProSIM R & D Pvt. Ltd.
Design and Analysis of Brake Component
Design and Analysis of Brake Component
IRJET Journal
1c03projectlinkedin
1c03projectlinkedin
Keyur Patel
Etm551 lecture04
Etm551 lecture04
Alex Chuê
Murata SCC2000 Series X or Z-Axis Gyro & 3-Axis Accelerometer 2015 teardown r...
Murata SCC2000 Series X or Z-Axis Gyro & 3-Axis Accelerometer 2015 teardown r...
Yole Developpement
Using Bayesian Optimization to Tune Machine Learning Models
Using Bayesian Optimization to Tune Machine Learning Models
Scott Clark
Using Bayesian Optimization to Tune Machine Learning Models
Using Bayesian Optimization to Tune Machine Learning Models
SigOpt
MySQL Performance Schema : fossasia
MySQL Performance Schema : fossasia
Mayank Prasad
IRJET- Structural Analysis of Student Formula Race Car Chassis
IRJET- Structural Analysis of Student Formula Race Car Chassis
IRJET Journal
RANJITH_RESUME
RANJITH_RESUME
Ranjith B C
Va.ve approach
Va.ve approach
AnujKSingh
Semelhante a Optimization based Chassis Design
(20)
Portfolio
Portfolio
Enterprise
Enterprise
Minor Project PPT
Minor Project PPT
IRJET- Design Optimization of a Formula Student Suspension
IRJET- Design Optimization of a Formula Student Suspension
A Method for Finding Document Containning Reactionary Viewpoints
A Method for Finding Document Containning Reactionary Viewpoints
IRJET- Thermal Behavior of Disc Brake Rotor using Finite Element Analysis
IRJET- Thermal Behavior of Disc Brake Rotor using Finite Element Analysis
R Programming: Transform/Reshape Data In R
R Programming: Transform/Reshape Data In R
A way to reduce mass of gearbox housing
A way to reduce mass of gearbox housing
Design and Optimization of Steering System
Design and Optimization of Steering System
Automotive Noise and Vibration Congress 2016
Automotive Noise and Vibration Congress 2016
Design and Analysis of Brake Component
Design and Analysis of Brake Component
1c03projectlinkedin
1c03projectlinkedin
Etm551 lecture04
Etm551 lecture04
Murata SCC2000 Series X or Z-Axis Gyro & 3-Axis Accelerometer 2015 teardown r...
Murata SCC2000 Series X or Z-Axis Gyro & 3-Axis Accelerometer 2015 teardown r...
Using Bayesian Optimization to Tune Machine Learning Models
Using Bayesian Optimization to Tune Machine Learning Models
Using Bayesian Optimization to Tune Machine Learning Models
Using Bayesian Optimization to Tune Machine Learning Models
MySQL Performance Schema : fossasia
MySQL Performance Schema : fossasia
IRJET- Structural Analysis of Student Formula Race Car Chassis
IRJET- Structural Analysis of Student Formula Race Car Chassis
RANJITH_RESUME
RANJITH_RESUME
Va.ve approach
Va.ve approach
Mais de Altair
Altair for Manufacturing Applications
Altair for Manufacturing Applications
Altair
Smart Product Development: Scalable Solutions for Your Entire Product Lifecycle
Smart Product Development: Scalable Solutions for Your Entire Product Lifecycle
Altair
Simplify and Scale FEA Post-Processing
Simplify and Scale FEA Post-Processing
Altair
Designing for Sustainability: Altair's Customer Story
Designing for Sustainability: Altair's Customer Story
Altair
why digital twin adoption rates are skyrocketing.pdf
why digital twin adoption rates are skyrocketing.pdf
Altair
Can digital twins save the planet?
Can digital twins save the planet?
Altair
Altair for Industrial Design Applications
Altair for Industrial Design Applications
Altair
Analyze performance and operations of truck fleets in real time
Analyze performance and operations of truck fleets in real time
Altair
Powerful Customer Intelligence | Altair Knowledge Studio
Powerful Customer Intelligence | Altair Knowledge Studio
Altair
Altair Data analytics for Healthcare.
Altair Data analytics for Healthcare.
Altair
AI supported material test automation.
AI supported material test automation.
Altair
Altair High-performance Computing (HPC) and Cloud
Altair High-performance Computing (HPC) and Cloud
Altair
No Code Data Transformation for Insurance with Altair Monarch
No Code Data Transformation for Insurance with Altair Monarch
Altair
Altair Data analytics for Banking, Financial Services and Insurance
Altair Data analytics for Banking, Financial Services and Insurance
Altair
Altair data analytics and artificial intelligence solutions
Altair data analytics and artificial intelligence solutions
Altair
Are You Maximising the Potential of Composite Materials?
Are You Maximising the Potential of Composite Materials?
Altair
Lead time reduction in CAE: Automated FEM Description Report
Lead time reduction in CAE: Automated FEM Description Report
Altair
The Team H2politO: vehicles for low consumption competitions using HyperWorks
The Team H2politO: vehicles for low consumption competitions using HyperWorks
Altair
Improving of Assessment Quality of Fatigue Analysis Using: MS, FEMFAT and FEM...
Improving of Assessment Quality of Fatigue Analysis Using: MS, FEMFAT and FEM...
Altair
Fatigue Life from Sine-on-Random Excitation
Fatigue Life from Sine-on-Random Excitation
Altair
Mais de Altair
(20)
Altair for Manufacturing Applications
Altair for Manufacturing Applications
Smart Product Development: Scalable Solutions for Your Entire Product Lifecycle
Smart Product Development: Scalable Solutions for Your Entire Product Lifecycle
Simplify and Scale FEA Post-Processing
Simplify and Scale FEA Post-Processing
Designing for Sustainability: Altair's Customer Story
Designing for Sustainability: Altair's Customer Story
why digital twin adoption rates are skyrocketing.pdf
why digital twin adoption rates are skyrocketing.pdf
Can digital twins save the planet?
Can digital twins save the planet?
Altair for Industrial Design Applications
Altair for Industrial Design Applications
Analyze performance and operations of truck fleets in real time
Analyze performance and operations of truck fleets in real time
Powerful Customer Intelligence | Altair Knowledge Studio
Powerful Customer Intelligence | Altair Knowledge Studio
Altair Data analytics for Healthcare.
Altair Data analytics for Healthcare.
AI supported material test automation.
AI supported material test automation.
Altair High-performance Computing (HPC) and Cloud
Altair High-performance Computing (HPC) and Cloud
No Code Data Transformation for Insurance with Altair Monarch
No Code Data Transformation for Insurance with Altair Monarch
Altair Data analytics for Banking, Financial Services and Insurance
Altair Data analytics for Banking, Financial Services and Insurance
Altair data analytics and artificial intelligence solutions
Altair data analytics and artificial intelligence solutions
Are You Maximising the Potential of Composite Materials?
Are You Maximising the Potential of Composite Materials?
Lead time reduction in CAE: Automated FEM Description Report
Lead time reduction in CAE: Automated FEM Description Report
The Team H2politO: vehicles for low consumption competitions using HyperWorks
The Team H2politO: vehicles for low consumption competitions using HyperWorks
Improving of Assessment Quality of Fatigue Analysis Using: MS, FEMFAT and FEM...
Improving of Assessment Quality of Fatigue Analysis Using: MS, FEMFAT and FEM...
Fatigue Life from Sine-on-Random Excitation
Fatigue Life from Sine-on-Random Excitation
Optimization based Chassis Design
1.
Optimization based Chassis
Design 2015 Altair Technology Conference 5th – 7th May 2015 Adrian Chapple
2.
©2014 GESTAMP 1 Introduction Optimization
based Chassis Design
3.
©2014 GESTAMP 2 Gestamp
Global Locations Optimization based Chassis Design
4.
©2012 GESTAMP 3 UNITED
STATES 7 Production Plants MEXICO 3 Production Plants BRAZIL 6 Production Plants ARGENTINA 4 Production Plants 1 - Alabama 2 - Lapeer 1 - Mason 1 - South Carolina 1 – Chatanooga 1 – West Virginia 1 - Aguascalientes 1 - Puebla 1 - Toluca 1 - Gravataí 1 - Pananá 1 - Santa Isabel 1 - Sorocaba 1 - Taubaté 1 - Córdoba 3 - Buenos Aires 7 3 6 4 Optimization based Chassis Design Gestamp in America
5.
©2014 GESTAMP 4 Gestamp
Chassis Products Optimization based Chassis Design
6.
©2014 GESTAMP 5 Vehicle
Dynamics Ride and Handling Comfort Noise and Vibration Press and Customer perception Crash Performance Euro/ US NCAP IIHS Rating Safety Marketing One off abuse Chain of failure Controlled failure Abuse Durability Vehicle is Durable No Warranty Robust Design • The objective is also clear, low mass and low cost. • The challenge, does the customer really know what they want, from the suppliers component? • Each product has clearly defined performance and manufacturing constraints. Gestamp Chassis Products – Requirements Optimization based Chassis Design
7.
©2014 GESTAMP 6 Challenge
1 Optimised Chassis Design Optimization based Chassis Design
8.
©2014 GESTAMP 7 Optimization
based Chassis Design Optimisation is now every day practice for most CAE enabled businesses. After understanding the need to identify the optimum solution, the challenge for most chassis component suppliers is to develop a product suitable for high volume manufacture. Optimum sheet metal structures – Challenge 1 Package space Skeleton solution Tube copy Sheet copy The key was to define the performance of the perfect design and measure the efficiency of the copy against this perfect design.
9.
©2014 GESTAMP 8 Optimization
based Chassis Design Gestamp have developed a process to transform the perfect design, the skeleton inside the package space, into a sheet metal equivalent. The process can give 25% mass reduction compared to conventional approach. Developed over several years and projects with improved understanding on design for manufacture. Optimum sheet metal structures – edict process Package space Skeleton Sheet metal structureAnalysisPackage space Skeleton Sheet metal structureAnalysis
10.
©2014 GESTAMP 9 Optimization
based Chassis Design - edict Gestamp developed an algorithm to analyse the optimisation output density field and replace with solid volume results with an equivalent sheet metal structure that best represented the solid geometric properties. The second stage of the algorith is to grow the sheet solution until connecting surfaces are formed. Optimum sheet metal structures – The translation tool This tool is key to Gestamps comeptitive advantage in the design of lightweight steel chassis frames. optimisation analysis Sheet metal structureVolume model Generated sheet metal structure AnalysisOptimisation
11.
©2014 GESTAMP 10 Optimization
based Chassis Design - edict Optimum sheet metal structures – Results Gestamp have developed a process to transform the perfect design, the skeleton inside the package space, into a sheet metal equivalent. The process can give 25% mass reduction compared to conventional approach. Developed over several years and projects with improved understanding on design for manufacture. However, the vehicles programs developed with this total optimsaiton approach are now coming to an end and need re-designing and the customer wants the same weight saving again.
12.
©2014 GESTAMP 11 Challenge
2 Same weight reduction again please! Optimization based Chassis Design
13.
©2014 GESTAMP 12 Optimization
based Chassis Design Further Weight savings – Challenge 2 where next? Only a small amount of weight saving will come from better application of the current tools (or more resource), a more intelligent approach will yield greater results. Gestamp have focussed recent efforts to reduce component mass by using optimisation to challenge targets, and consider the real question that needs optimising. Challenge targetsSystem level optimisation Multi-domain optimisation
14.
©2014 GESTAMP 13 Further
Weight Saving – Challenge Component Targets Optimization based Chassis Design
15.
©2014 GESTAMP 14 •
In order to predict the performance of the component based on the different design variables and equation was required for each design response. • Hyperstudy software was used to set up a Design Of Experiments study and extract interpolations for each variable. Optimization based Chassis Design FCA_LHS_y = 0.25928 + (-5.08571e-05 * arb_brkt) + (-0.000155424 * diff_brkts) + (-0.00357842 * flca_brkts) + (-0.00300373 * front_upper) + (-0.0305444 * lower) + (-0.00265223 * rear_closer) + (-0.00389033 * rear_upper) + (-0.00138019 * rlca_brkts) + (- 0.00926752 * siderail) + (-0.0041613 * tower_closer) + (-4.99368e-05 * arb_brkt * arb_brkt) + (-9.91163e-05 * arb_brkt * diff_brkts) + (4.15957e-05 * arb_brkt * flca_brkts) + (8.13897e-05 * arb_brkt * front_upper) + (3.71936e-05 * arb_brkt * lower) + (3.14648e-06 * arb_brkt * rear_closer) + (4.00817e-05 * arb_brkt * rear_upper) + (0.000108841 * arb_brkt * rlca_brkts) + (-0.000197566 * arb_brkt * siderail) + (8.18722e-05 * arb_brkt * tower_closer) + (4.04482e-05 * diff_brkts * diff_brkts) + (-5.07071e-05 * diff_brkts * flca_brkts) + (- 1.59178e-05 * diff_brkts * front_upper) + (0.000136322 * diff_brkts * lower) + (-8.48643e-05 * diff_brkts * rear_closer) + (8.87484e-05 * diff_brkts * rear_upper) + (1.59915e-05 * diff_brkts * rlca_brkts) + (-0.000178697 * diff_brkts * siderail) + (5.45731e-05 * diff_brkts * tower_closer) + (0.000271955 * flca_brkts * flca_brkts) + (-1.32405e-05 * flca_brkts * front_upper) + (0.000140077 * flca_brkts * lower) + (2.14879e-05 * flca_brkts * rear_closer) + (-3.93529e-05 * flca_brkts * rear_upper) + (3.32677e-05 * flca_brkts * rlca_brkts) + (0.000179994 * flca_brkts * siderail) + (-7.69277e-05 * flca_brkts * tower_closer) + (0.000191444 * front_upper * front_upper) + (8.512e- 05 * front_upper * lower) + (-1.7937e-05 * front_upper * rear_closer) + (0.000103053 * front_upper * rear_upper) + (-0.000152548 * front_upper * rlca_brkts) + (8.32334e-05 * front_upper * siderail) + (0.000131147 * front_upper * tower_closer) + (0.0028065 * lower * lower) + (-0.000177823 * lower * rear_closer) + (6.8397e-05 * lower * rear_upper) + (0.000117493 * lower * rlca_brkts) + (0.000384257 * lower * siderail) + (0.00013488 * lower * tower_closer) + (0.000274493 * rear_closer * rear_closer) + (2.68192e-06 * rear_closer * rear_upper) + (6.69264e-05 * rear_closer * rlca_brkts) + (0.000257607 * rear_closer * siderail) + (5.2742e-05 * rear_closer * tower_closer) + (0.000267322 * rear_upper * rear_upper) + (6.3803e-05 * rear_upper * rlca_brkts) + (-6.93601e-05 * rear_upper * siderail) + (1.02142e-05 * rear_upper * tower_closer) + (5.85151e-05 * rlca_brkts * rlca_brkts) + (7.32327e-05 * rlca_brkts * siderail) + (- 0.000134385 * rlca_brkts * tower_closer) + (0.000659127 * siderail * siderail) + (0.000169322 * siderail * tower_closer) + (0.000269377 * tower_closer * tower_closer) Response 1 (quadratic interpolation all variables ) • After checking that the model used enough power and data points to give acceptable error (<1%), each of the 12 responses was then added into excel so that predictions for the component could be made without using finite element analysis for each possible option. • This allows the solver in excel to be used to optimise the performance. Response 1 (2 variable only) Further Weight Saving – Challenge Component Targets
16.
©2014 GESTAMP 15 Optimization
based Chassis Design Point Target Stiffness N/mm Actual Value N/mm FCA lhs y 5770 6159 FCA rhs y 5800 6227 RCA lhs y 7960 8210 RCA rhs y 7940 8307 arb lhs 2200 2200 arb rhs 2200 2250 rack lhs y 7870 8560 rack rhs y 7860 8575 diff lhs 2500 2820 diff rh rear 2950 2950 diff rh front 2880 2925 pt3 parallel lhs 3130 3354 pt3 parallel rhs 3130 3373 pt3 opp lhs 36955 37792 pt3 opp rhs 36955 40464 FCA lhs x 16190 16190 FCA rhs x 16591 17922 RCA lhs x 13670 18544 RCA rhs x 13800 18121 rack lhs z 2600 2600 rack rhs z 2640 2688 Mass (kg) 19.72 Current Value Initial Lower Upper dv1 arb_brkt 2.43 2.50 2.00 5.00 dv2 diff_brkts 1.80 2.00 1.80 4.00 dv4 flca_brkts 4.00 2.50 1.80 4.00 dv6 front_upper 2.22 2.50 1.80 4.00 dv7 lower 1.82 1.80 1.80 4.00 dv8 rear_closer 3.15 1.80 1.80 4.00 dv9 rear_upper 1.99 2.00 1.80 4.00 dv10 rlca_brkts 4.00 2.50 1.80 4.00 dv11 siderail 1.99 2.50 1.80 4.00 dv12 tower_closer 4.00 2.00 1.80 4.00 mass flca_lhs_y rca_lhs_y fca_rhs_y rca_rhs_y arb_lhs_z arb_rhs_z rack_lhs_y rack_rhs_y diff_lh 19.72 0.16 0.12 -0.16 -0.12 -0.45 -0.44 0.12 -0.12 -0 1 5 2 3 4 • 1. Objective to minimize mass of component. • 2. Change cells to alter design variable (sheet thickness of each panel) • 3. Re-calculate predicted performance based on new sheet thickness values. • 4. Constrain panel thickness to be within sensible upper and lower bounds • 5. Make sure that predicted performance is above the required minimum level. 3b Further Weight Saving – Challenge Component Targets
17.
©2014 GESTAMP 16 Optimization
based Chassis Design • Driving targets identified, actual component performance presented along with panel gauge and total mass. Further Weight Saving – Challenge Component Targets Baseline Proposal 1
18.
©2014 GESTAMP 17 Optimization
based Chassis Design In order to identify which of the stiffness / modal targets were driving mass into this recent rear chassis frame gauge optimisation was used to highlight and optimise the component targets. Further Weight Saving – Challenge Component Targets Baseline 1 2 3 4 • 1. By reducing the bending mode target by only 10Hz it is possible to reduce the mass by 4%, beyond this 10Hz other targets are driving the mass into the component. • 2. Line 2 shows the effect of reducing the minimum gauge of panels used on the component. • 3. Line 3 shows by slightly reducing the ARBz target another 5% mass reduction is achieved. • 4. Finally with the ARB, bending mode and 1.5mm panels used it is the front body mount stiffness dictating the mass of the frame. • Overall 2kg or 12% mass reduction can be achieved through small reduction in 3 key targets.
19.
©2014 GESTAMP 18 Optimization
based Chassis Design The previous study crudely used only gauge to increase or reduce performance. This study used the topology results to define a structure to consider the impact upon mass for a possible frequency target. Link attachment stiffness targets ONLY ~ 14.6kg Link attachment stiffness targets + torsional modal requirement ~ 15.2kg Further Weight Saving – Challenge Component Targets (Topology) Sheet translation 2 (tube version) 15.1kg Sheet translation 1 All pressed solution 16.0kg Sheet translation 1 All pressed solution 15.0kg • The topology results clearly show different loadpath requirements if the torsional mode is included and there is a mass penalty for this target. However, when the topology result is translated into a sheet metal finished frame, it is the quality of the copy that determines the level of mass reduction.
20.
©2014 GESTAMP 19 Optimization
based Chassis Design • Challenging component targets always results in our customers verifying the performance of a reduced level frame in a system simulation, including all of the other chassis parts and measuring vehicle performance metrics. • The logical next step is to remove the component targets and optimize against these system requirements. Further Weight Saving - System Level Optimisation System level Vehicle Dynamics targets Sheet translation 2 (tube version) 15.1kg Sheet translation of system topology results 13.7kg Sheet translation 1 All pressed solution 16.0kg Component targets derived to achieve system level performance. • Clearly there is weight saving in just translating the topology results well 16.0kg vs 15.1kg but another 10% reduction in mass is achieved by translating the results based on the system level targets.
21.
©2014 GESTAMP 20 Optimization
based Chassis Design Topology Volume Model • Again on a series production frame system level optimization has successfully been used to add a missing vehicle dynamics attribute. • In this particular case the system level topology optimization achieved the vehicle attribute with a 360g brace. Previous to this study 2.0kg of additional up gauge and a far less efficient brace was proposed. Further Weight Saving - System Level Optimisation Topology optimisation results Final Design Solution
22.
©2014 GESTAMP 21 Optimization
based Chassis Design Camber stiffness “x-20” kN/o Camber stiffness “x+40”kN/o Further Weight Saving - System Level Optimisation + Challenge Targets • It is obviously possible to challenge the vehicle system targets as well. • In the example below one of the system vehicle dynamics targets is challenged Graph showing topology mass vs camber stiffness target • In this study the topology result mass was used to show the effect on the target. • The results show that the target can be increased up to a value of “x” kN/degree with little impact on mass, beyond that this target become mass driving. “x”
23.
©2014 GESTAMP 22 Optimization
based Chassis Design • Finally on this latest project it has been possible to include a further system target the dB(A) noise in the cable from a noise transfer function applied through the wheel. • The full impact of this different approach can be seen by considering the results from two frames on the same vehicle platform, one designed based on component targets, the second designed to system level requirements. • Although in fact the Wave1 vehicle has some additional functionality the MDO system level optimization resulted in a 27% mass reduction. Further Weight Saving - System Level Optimisation + MDO Wave 1 vehicle designed to component requirements Wave 2 vehicle designed to system level Vehicle Dynamics and NVH performance Mass = 1.0 Mass = 0.73
24.
©2014 GESTAMP 23 Optimization
based Chassis Design • It is possible to achieve significant weight saving over traditionally designed chassis components using optimization based on efficiently translating topology results into sheet steel solutions. • Challenging mass driving component targets using to tools provided by Altair provides the opportunity to save mass on existing fully optimized components. • Smart optimization based on designing to “more valid” system level targets and including most if not all performance requirements into the topology optimization problem provides the opportunity to save mass further. • In the most valid complete case study carried out comparing the performance of component targets vs system level requirements 27% mass reduction was achieved against a fully optimized chassis component. Conclusions
25.
©2014 GESTAMP AUTOMOCIÓN
Baixar agora