Proof of deliberate Conspiracy of Silence, obstruction of TX CT scan investigation. Medical crime is allowed when kept silent is the conclusion with my study about the praxis in the Netherlands.

1. FRAUD: Signs of manipulations of physical RX negatives seen from the aspect of production-process-technology.
Lectori Salutem! In this epistle the physical X-ray negatives mainly will be shown seen from the aspect of production
technology. Now first some theory about making regular physical Photo and X-ray-negatives. (Completely at the end
some additional image information about irregularities of image-information is added as minor added information.
In general the production process of negatives of X-ray negatives and regular black and white negatives for regular
photography is nearly the same. X-ray negatives are then sensitive to X-ray light, but they are also sensitive to
regular light and also shouldn´t be exposed freely to daylight before use in photography and the development of.
In regular photography we know the technique of filling in light with mirrors to enlighten the object extra while
being photographed (contrast technique). In X-ray photography another kind of frequency of X-ray light then is used
to fill in the image to be photographed with X-ray light. But generally speaking the development of negatives after
exposing to a measured amount of light on the chemical emulsion on the film (, which already provokes a chemical
reaction creating an imprint of the image), the chemical development-process after is completely the same. This
process of production also is a one way and one time use only: each step cannot be undone or reversed from the
exposition to light till the process of development. After exposing to light the film is put in a bath with developer in a
dark chamber for a measured amount of time. Then after the film is rinsed with water to remove the remaining
developer and then put in a bath of fixation to remove remaining un-reacted emulsion to stop the sensitivity for light
of the negative, otherwise the image would disappear. Only then after this fixation and again washing and then
drying the negatives are ready to be seen in daylight with a chemical stable un-reversible image result on the film.
To work with images in layers as in digital photography with Photoshop is not so easy to do with physical negatives.
Manipulation of images in the old school techniques in layers meant one had to work with several negatives already
developed placed on top of each other with a fresh new one underneath, which them would be again exposed to a
measured amount of light producing a copy of the total result and then being developed etc. This process of copying
negatives (re-using the image-information on the film) also was difficult, because slight errors were easily made and
marks and signs of not being an original negative were only to be discovered after development of the result. This
also was a very time-consuming process to get a good result, nowadays in Photoshop this is easy realized digitally.
Collection of Negatives from are institutes ZHS1 and ZHS2 where from details are shown :

2. ZHS1 Cervical Frontalis extraction from phot
SR-REGULAR 007406
ZHS1 Cervical Oralis extraction from ph
ZHS1 Cervical Sagittalis extraction from
ZHS1H Head Sagittalis extraction from
ZHS1 Cervical Frontalis extraction from photo ZHS1F
REGULAR 007406 KN / NG- SR 97490717
extraction from photo ZHS1O
KN / MG-SR 97490717
KN / MG-SR 97490717
extraction from photo ZHS1S
KN / MG -
KN / MG –
extraction from photo ZHS1H
KN / MG -
On all ZHS1 negatives the same
nametag with exactly the sane
handwriting and even the s
scotch for attaching is being used.
There is difference in series
registration numbers: from
from …369 to 371 and then jumps
907. This is odd for old fashion regular X
made right one after another with the
equipment by one person
This nametag shows a remain of other
information underneath. Inside the ‘six’ there
originally should be
this is the first sign of re
of image information
The X-rays were made right one after
another, so I cannot explain the jump of
registration numbers of X
made and also the largest scan ZHS1H
only had just one registration number.
SR 97490717 – 2 22207371
SR 97490717-2 22207369
SR 97490717-2 222073(70?)
SP 08190762-1 13200309
– SP 08190762-1 13200308
SP 08190763 - 1 43300907
On all ZHS1 negatives the same
exactly the sane
handwriting and even the same
cotch for attaching is being used.
in series and a leap in digital
registration numbers: from …308 to 309 and then
and then jumps all the way to …
fashion regular X-rays being
made right one after another with the same X-ray
by one person in that same institute.
This nametag shows a remain of other
information underneath. Inside the ‘six’ there
be no emulsion meaning
this is the first sign of re-use (manipulation)
age information in layers.
rays were made right one after
not explain the jump of
registration numbers of X-rays being
also the largest scan ZHS1H
only had just one registration number.

3. ZHS2 Cervical Oralis extraction from
ZHS2 Cervical Sagittalis extraction from
The object-rotation on sagittal to frontal scan
ZHS1
extraction from photo ZHS2O
extraction from photo ZHS2S
digital number 0007770400939
This nametag shows a remain of
other information underneath.
This is a sign of (manipulation
use of image information leading
to questioning the integrity
very X-ray negative.
Brand information runs into dark,
but on that spot there should not
be any Photo
white ciphers
This nametag
other information underneath
too and was made within a
minute time after the first one.
Again this is a sign of
of image information leading to
questioning integrity of.
Brand information runs
dark, but also other brand
information is mirrored: that is a
very obvious mark of traces of
image manipulation.
digital number. 0007770400938
to frontal scan is around a diagonal axis and not 90o
around a vertical ax
The position of the object
on ZHS1S and ZHS2S
the vertebra
equal in position and proportions,
the object
While the object is supposed to
be locked up inside the vertebral
canal it is also even reaching
outside the vertebra
ZHS2
This nametag shows a remain of
other information underneath.
This is a sign of (manipulation?) re-
of image information leading
to questioning the integrity of this
ray negative.
Brand information runs into dark,
but on that spot there should not
be any Photo-emulsion leaving
ciphers as standard result.
This nametag shows a remain of
other information underneath
and was made within a
minute time after the first one.
Again this is a sign of the re-use
of image information leading to
ing integrity of.
Brand information runs away into
dark, but also other brand
information is mirrored: that is a
very obvious mark of traces of
image manipulation.
digital number. 0007770400938
around a vertical axis as should be.
The position of the object shown
on ZHS1S and ZHS2S, although
the vertebras are of shown here
equal in position and proportions,
the object however clearly is not.
While the object is supposed to
be locked up inside the vertebral
canal it is also even reaching
outside the vertebral body.

4. Before the second operation there was no metal substance
not show any disturbances. Therefore the CT scan of Feb 15th 2000 also becomes questionable regarding integrity
because that one does show metal present in the oral cavity, wh
Supposed is a clip sagged down into the neck vertebral.
Dimension and position differ between various scans
Before the second operation there was no metal substance present inside the mouth or inside the neck;
Therefore the CT scan of Feb 15th 2000 also becomes questionable regarding integrity
because that one does show metal present in the oral cavity, while two MRI scans after before 2nd surgery do not
neck vertebral.
Dimension and position differ between various scans made after.
or inside the neck; MRI does
Therefore the CT scan of Feb 15th 2000 also becomes questionable regarding integrity,
ile two MRI scans after before 2nd surgery do not.

5. After the second operation there are metal c
mouth both MRI and CT scan show two pieces/locations of metal containing objects, however on MRI we see in the
neck three parts/locations but on CT (and RX after) we only see one single metal containing object/location.
On the 3D MRI resp. Sagittal Left and Posterior we clearly can see that that are more then one single metal containg
parts. If there was only a single Michel Clip present them all the image disturbances were connected to eachother.
The lower foreign body material parts also looks to surround the vertebral cord: is this the extinction artefact?
MRI is not the most suitable scanner to define the exact form of metal, it only gives a vague shape of presence but
for detecting metal containing parts it is t
of a metal containing object, but being single photo they appeared more easily to be manipulated then a MRI result.
Traces of ferro (blood) from skin towards vertebral canal in the middle image also indicates surgery being performed.
front
After the second operation there are metal containing substances present inside the nec
mouth both MRI and CT scan show two pieces/locations of metal containing objects, however on MRI we see in the
k three parts/locations but on CT (and RX after) we only see one single metal containing object/location.
On the 3D MRI resp. Sagittal Left and Posterior we clearly can see that that are more then one single metal containg
parts. If there was only a single Michel Clip present them all the image disturbances were connected to eachother.
material parts also looks to surround the vertebral cord: is this the extinction artefact?
MRI is not the most suitable scanner to define the exact form of metal, it only gives a vague shape of presence but
for detecting metal containing parts it is the strongest scanner. CT/RX is the suitable scanner for defining the shape
of a metal containing object, but being single photo they appeared more easily to be manipulated then a MRI result.
races of ferro (blood) from skin towards vertebral canal in the middle image also indicates surgery being performed.
Sagittal scan L
Posterior
L
ck and the mouth. In the
mouth both MRI and CT scan show two pieces/locations of metal containing objects, however on MRI we see in the
k three parts/locations but on CT (and RX after) we only see one single metal containing object/location.
On the 3D MRI resp. Sagittal Left and Posterior we clearly can see that that are more then one single metal containg
parts. If there was only a single Michel Clip present them all the image disturbances were connected to eachother.
material parts also looks to surround the vertebral cord: is this the extinction artefact?
MRI is not the most suitable scanner to define the exact form of metal, it only gives a vague shape of presence but
he strongest scanner. CT/RX is the suitable scanner for defining the shape
of a metal containing object, but being single photo they appeared more easily to be manipulated then a MRI result.
races of ferro (blood) from skin towards vertebral canal in the middle image also indicates surgery being performed.
WHY THE
SCAR IS IN
THE NECK?
WHAT IS
THERE TO
HIDE BY RX
MANIPULA-
TION?
Posterior
R

6. ZHS2O in full page in order to show the evidence with brand information being
the left and right border of the upper half of the image. This is the
negatives placed on top of each other for producing an new one with
negative underneath. This is a mark of proof of a complex old school dark
The clip ‘R’ under to the left also should be white
show the evidence with brand information being really mirrored
the left and right border of the upper half of the image. This is the most evident sign of manipulation with multiple
negatives placed on top of each other for producing an new one with by photo-copying the two towards a fresh new
tive underneath. This is a mark of proof of a complex old school dark-room technique for image
under to the left also should be white caused by the metal clip that is used in
really mirrored on one negative (on
most evident sign of manipulation with multiple
copying the two towards a fresh new
room technique for image-manipulation.
clip that is used in old-school RX-technology.