Project Management Consulting Services

Getting the Best Value for your
Building Dollar

How we can help!

Abhi Basu
Basu Technology, Inc.
abhibasu@basutech.com
856 245 9082

Introduction



Small and Focused


SDBE / MBE


Expert Team


2
(C) Basu Technology, Inc. 2008

Background

Over 30 years of experience working on

major capital expansion programs in the
region
Experienced in all facets of project delivery

cycle
Geared specifically to Facilities Construction


Working only with Owners


3

Project Experience

Columbia University


Princeton University


AT&T


Brookhaven National Labs


Rutgers University


Others


4

What we provide

Top down look from the Owners Viewpoint


Objective advice


Subject Matter Expertise


Technology Implementation


5

Our Mission

Empower the Owner with Critical Information

To make better decisions


To be proactive


Save cost and time


Manage Risks


6

Services

Project Audit, Process Audit


Project Monitoring & Peer Reviews


Risk Management


BIM Implementation


Set Up and Training

Project Controls


Metrics


Process


7

Industry Observation

An Owner can be his/her own worst enemy


Owners have the ability to set the tone for

each project and the potential for a
successful outcome for all stakeholders

FMI – CMAA 5th Annual Survey of Owners

8

Cost & Schedule Overruns

Owners identify main causes to be:

Incomplete drawings


Poor Pre-planning process


Escalating cost of Materials


Lack of timely decisions


Excessive change orders


FMI – CMAA 5th Annual Survey of Owners

9

Program Governance –
What Owners Can Control
Opportunities and Choices

 30% cost & schedule difference

 Project vs Program, Life-Cycle Costs

 Standards

Scope

 Ancillary Scope, Scope Creep, Dark Scope

Alignment

 Scope, timing, stakeholders, contracts

Organization

 Delivery, Change Control, Communications

Metrics & Reporting

 Making business sense

10

Improving Program Governance

Identify total scope and stake holders


Create comprehensive framework for

planning and executing
Create standards, establish gating


Align multiple projects and processes


Set up metrics and reporting on Owner needs


Monitor and audit


11

Creating a Framework for Planning, Executing
& Reporting
Framework Components

Comprehensive Scope Document


Enterprise Project Structure


Organization Breakdown Structure


Project Work Breakdown Structure


Processes


Reporting


Milestones & Metrics


12

How we can help …

Supplement your in-house staff with expert

knowledge and skills
Help set up your Program Management

Office
Immediate ramp-up of critical scoping,

planning, scheduling, risk management and
communications tasks
Help streamline your project delivery process

for maximum benefits
Provide the infrastructure and tools to take

full advantage of information technology
13

Specific Areas

Scheduling / Peer Reviews


Project Monitoring / Audits


Risk Management


Claims Analysis


BIM for Owners


14

Implementing Technology

Project Management and Project Control

Software
BIM


4D Scheduling


Training


15

Supporting Slides

16

Construction Cost-Project Cost-Life Cycle
Cost
Building First Costs

Project first costs are only about

Financing / Legal /

15% of Life Cycle Costs
Insurance
100 22
Land
10
80
8
For every dollar of First Cost

6 Furnishings
60

additional 5.67 dollars are spent
AEC
40 54

20
over the Building Life Cycle
Construction
0
1
Dispose

Building Life Cycle Costs

le
yc e
ec us
Re
/R Renovations
De

20
si g

100 Financial / Legal
n
Renewal

15
80 Taxes
17
Maintenance
60
tion

15
Operation
truc

40 18
Op
s

Construction
er
Con

at 20 15
io
ns
/U
0
se
1

17

Project Delivery Phases –
Cost of Making Changes

Conceptual Schematic Design
Planning
Design Design Development

Cost of Making Changes
Ability to Make Changes

Construction
Procurement
Documents

Commissioning
Construction
Closeout

Time

18

Front-End Planning

A change
here

Which should
have been
made here
19

Savings attributed to thorough concept
definition
Study Sample – 62 projects (CII)


Metric – Final TPC / Estimated TPC


Findings

Impact of Poor Design Drawings

20
Over Runs
15
% Cost Over run

10

5

0
High Medium Low
-5
Degree of Definition

20

Owners Fail to Track
Total Project Scope
Only part of the scope

is tracked in project
metrics

21

Mismatches in Cost Scope and Schedule
Scope

22

(Mis)Alignment of Responsibilities

Bilateral Contracts in a multi-lateral

framework
Stakeholder participation


Communications - Lost in translation


23

Major Players causing Project
Delays/Overruns
Factors Causing Cost / Schedule Overruns

Scope Changes
by Ow ner
Other Factors
19%
24%

AE Delays
8%
Delays by
External
Agencies
10%
Contractor's
Poor
Performance
39%

24

Cost of Rework

Project rework costs average 12.4% of TPC

80% caused by Errors & Omissions in Design

Documents
20% caused by poor construction practices


50% of construction change orders caused

by errors in design documents directly related
to uncoordinated drawings
Change orders cost 0.8 to 3.4% of TPC

Discipline interface review of documents

during design costs 0.1% of TPC
Payback ratio - $8 to $34 for every dollar

spent
25

Cost and Schedule Savings with BIM

26

27

Seeking to be a member of your core team

Abhi Basu
E-mail: abhibasu@basutech.com
Phone: 856 245 9082
We would be happy to come in and present to
you specific ways we can save you money

28

Project Management Consulting Services

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Mais procurados (20)

Destaque

Destaque (7)

Semelhante a Project Management Consulting Services

Semelhante a Project Management Consulting Services (20)

Último

Último (20)

Project Management Consulting Services