O slideshow foi denunciado.
Utilizamos seu perfil e dados de atividades no LinkedIn para personalizar e exibir anúncios mais relevantes. Altere suas preferências de anúncios quando desejar.
  CONTENT                                             2012 TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION INDUSTRY

Common methods of content reuse
                           Content reuse is the practice of using existing content compone...
Customers are                               ?
                                                            Online Support C...
Adobe FrameMaker Is Most Used Product
                                                authoring tools go, FrameMaker is
Próximos SlideShares
Carregando em…5


Technical Communication Industry Benchmarking Survey 2012 Slide 1 Technical Communication Industry Benchmarking Survey 2012 Slide 2 Technical Communication Industry Benchmarking Survey 2012 Slide 3 Technical Communication Industry Benchmarking Survey 2012 Slide 4
Próximos SlideShares
The State of the Technical Communication Industry: tcworld India 2013 Keynote Address
Transfira para ler offline e ver em ecrã inteiro.

4 gostaram


Baixar para ler offline

Technical Communication Industry Benchmarking Survey 2012

Baixar para ler offline

Here's a summary of the annual Technical Communication Industry Benchmarking Survey conducted by The Content Wrangler in the fourth quarter of 2012. The survey focused on the enterprise technical documentation and training needs of large, global, content-heavy organizations.

Technical Communication Industry Benchmarking Survey 2012

  1. 1. STRUCTURED CONTENT 2012 TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION INDUSTRY BENCHMARKING SURVEY 44% of companies create structured XML content SUMMARY RESULTS Agile documentation adoption DITA slow, not always successful 81% of companies that The majority of technical documentation and training create structured departments have not adopted an agile approach to creating content use DITA and publishing content. Agile methods are based on iterative and incremental cycles that promote adaptive planning, evolutionary development, and flexible responses to change. OTHER FLAVORS While 45% of companies surveyed claim to apply agile 30% use custom XML DTDs development principles to TechComm projects, few do it successfully. Typical challenges include organizational silos, 16% use DocBook lack of governance, differing approaches. The waterfall development method is the dominant approach in use today. Biggest challenge is the lack of content strategy Our benchmarking survey • Inability to effectively reuse The next biggest challenges: uncovered a wide variety of content challenges facing companies that • Lack of governance • Creation of inconsistent, produce technical documentation inaccurate, or mediocre quality • Lack of time, money and and training content. The biggest content resources challenge identified was the lack of a formal content strategy. • Producing content of unknown customer value Commonly cited symptoms of • Process problems and production organizations lacking a content bottlenecks strategy include: WHAT INNOVATIONS ARE YOU PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE? 21% 14% 11% Moving to topic-based content models like the Darwin Information Typing The adoption of a component content management system is the second Creating video documentation and training content is the third most Architecture is the most common most common innovation planned for common innovation planned for the innovation planned for the future— the future—cited by 14% of companies. future—cited by 11% of companies. cited by 21% of companies. DITA/XML CCMS VIDEO
  2. 2. Common methods of content reuse Content reuse is the practice of using existing content components to develop new “documents.” Although the majority of reusable content is text-based, any content can be reused (such as graphics, charts, media). Text-based materials are the easiest to reuse. You can reuse sections, paragraphs, sentences, or even words. CONTENT There are three primary methods of reusing content employed by companies today. REUSE Copy-and-paste Most often, when an author realizes the need to reuse a piece of content, they copy it from one document and paste it into another. This copy-and-paste form of content reuse 85% is quite natural—even convenient—but introduces potential problems. Because the content is actually cloned (duplicated in each document in which it is reused) and each reused piece exists on its own (disconnected from its source content, unable to be easily located, retrieved, and updated) copy-and-paste is the most error-prone, inefficient and costly method of content reuse. of companies reuse Manual reuse documentation and In manual reuse—the most common form of content reuse—authors manually locate a component of content, retrieve it, and reuse it, Manual reuse doesn’t rely on specific training content technology. Although it can be accomplished without a content management system (CMS), managing manual reuse is best accomplished with the help of a CMS. 5% Manual reuse makes it easy for organizations to rapidly reconfigure reusable content into new information products. It works well for source language and translated content. Manual reuse provides authors with the greatest flexibility, but is problematic as it usually results in the lowest incidence of reuse because BENEFITS it puts the burden of reusing content on the authors. If of companies that authors lack motivation, if they are unaware that Increased consistency reuse content have reusable components exist, or if they have trouble 30% done so either to finding it, reuse may not occur. “innovate” or Automatic reuse “respond” to threats Automatic reuse is planned reuse. Specific content is or opportunities identified as reusable in a specific location. Then the content management system automatically inserts quickly (auto-populates) the reusable content in the Ease of maintenance appropriate locations in the document. The and updating author does not have to determine whether 25% the reusable content exists or search for and retrieve it. Automatic reuse ensures that content is reused and reduces the burden on the author to know that reusable content exists, to find the reusable content, and to Lower total cost insert it appropriately. This reuse method is 24% dependent upon detailed information models, reuse maps (identification of where content is reused in an information set), and support for dynamic delivery of content through your content management system. This means that automatic reuse is planned for in advance, in the modeling and system configuration stage. Authors do not Reduced determine reuse; the system determines localization cost 12% reuse. Source: “Managing Enterprise Content: A Unified Content Strategy” by Ann Rockley and Charles Cooper (2012, New Riders). Info: www.managingenterprisecontent.com 2
  3. 3. Customers are ? Online Support Communities editing and creating content Companies are finding interesting ways to leverage the power of the 53% of companies provide customers with access to an online support forum or online community 32% crowd to help them create, update, and improve documentation and training content. 20% of companies allow their of companies rely on their customers to edit documentation customer service or technical and training content. Many of these support staff to monitor online firms use wiki-based tools that support forums and online provide customers with web-based communities editing capability. Edits usually 20% of companies distribute responsibility across undergo a review and approval multiple roles (marketing, support, customer process, although 8% of firms allow service, technical communication, training, “trusted” customers to edit and and subject matter experts publish corrections without formal review. The level of scrutiny customer- 10% of companies employonline support forums manager to monitor a dedicated community submitted edits undergo before going “live” is not only a matter of More than one-third of those of proper infrastructure and/or trust, it is also directly linked to the companies encourage customers to do technology (18%) are also commonly type of content being produced and so. cited reasons for customers not being the liability or non-compliance risk allowed to create content. associated with customers editing The reasons for not allowing that content. customers to create content are Interestingly, about 10% of companies usually related to concerns about say their customers are creating Similarly, 17% of companies today quality (30%), liability and regulatory documentation and training (and allow customers to create compliance concerns (22%). Lack of publishing them online) without their documentation and training content. management support (18%) and lack approval. CUSTOMER FEEDBACK AND RATINGS While the mechanisms put in place to Companies that do it well enjoy many help customers provide feedback benefits, the most valuable include: about documentation and training improved customer support scores content vary widely — from old school (47%), improved content quality approaches like surveys and (17%), support call deflection (16%), interviews to newer methods like blog reduced support call volume (13%), comments and Facebook-style “likes” and reduced average call handling — organizations that use reactions time (12%). from customers to improve content quality say they are looking for ways Additional improvements include: to gather immediate feedback. They’re spotting problems with product also looking for ways to put that design, spotting process problems, as feedback to good use. well as a reduction in negative feedback and complaints.
  4. 4. Adobe FrameMaker Is Most Used Product authoring tools go, FrameMaker is used more than Microsoft Word THE TOP TEN MOST USED (35%) and XMetaL Author (11%). SOFTWARE PRODUCTS Snagit captures the second spot TechSmith Snagit proves to be the 1. Adobe FrameMaker 41% second most popular tool used by technical communication and 2. TechSmith Snagit 35% training pros. 35% of companies that ••• produce technical documentation and 3. Microsoft Word 35% training have it in their tool chest. We asked survey respondents the following question: “What software Microsoft is still in the mix 4. Adobe Acrobat Pro 28% tools does your company use to Microsoft Word is the third most used create, manage and deliver software product. 35% of companies 5. Adobe Captivate 20% documentation and training use Word — often along side other content?” authoring tools. Its Office-mate and 6. Adobe RoboHelp 19% code-sharing cousin, PowerPoint also As it turns out, technical communication and training holds a spot in the top ten with 11% of 7. TechSmith Camtasia 12% companies using the software for departments use a wide variety of training and other purposes. tools to get the job done. Software 8. XMetaL Author 11% varies based on the type of work Adobe is the dominant force performed and the industry sector served. 28% of companies surveyed use 9. Microsoft PowerPoint 11% Acrobat Pro to create documentation The top ten most common tools are and training deliverables, making it 10. Adobe Photoshop 11% manufactured by four companies (see the fourth most commonly used tool. list at right). Adobe leads the pack Adobe also holds the fifth spot with with five of the top ten tools. Captivate—the most often used screen Microsoft and TechSmith have two recording tool (20%)—and the sixth tools each on the list; JustSystems spot with online help mainstay, has one. RoboHelp. Adobe FrameMaker is most used XML Authoring with XMetaL Companies that create technical 11% of companies use XMetaL for documentation are most likely to do XML authoring, making it the 8th so with the help of Adobe most used tool among those surveyed. FrameMaker (41%). As far as DISCLAIMER AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 2012 Technical Communication Industry Benchmarking Survey Summary This is a summary of the 2012 Technical Communication Industry Benchmarking Survey (conducted by The Content Wrangler, Inc.) an informal, web-based survey that compares responses from over 500 companies from countries around the globe. The results are not scientific, but do provide us with meaningful data points and help us spot trends. The majority of survey respondents work for firms in the computer software and hardware sector (63%), followed by the financial services sector (9%), life sciences and healthcare (9%) , telecommunication (5%), publishing and media (3%) and others. This summary is provided for informational purposes only. The Content Wrangler, Inc. is not providing advice, nor do we warrant the accuracy or completeness of this information. The results of the survey do not in any way constitute an endorsement or recommendation of any of the brands, methods, products or approaches mentioned. Use due diligence whenever deciding whether or not to adopt new information management tools, techniques or processes. Questions? Email: scott@thecontentwrangler.com Office: 415.857.2235 The Content Wrangler The Content Wrangler 4153 24th Street Suite 4, San Francisco CA 94114
  • MohammadAbuEid1

    Feb. 19, 2017
  • akatc

    Sep. 30, 2014
  • davidnind

    Mar. 12, 2013
  • IntelligentContent

    Feb. 21, 2013

Here's a summary of the annual Technical Communication Industry Benchmarking Survey conducted by The Content Wrangler in the fourth quarter of 2012. The survey focused on the enterprise technical documentation and training needs of large, global, content-heavy organizations.


Vistos totais


No Slideshare


De incorporações


Número de incorporações